Advances in Botanical Research, Volume 54
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reduced Visitation to the Buzz-Pollinated Cyanella Hyacinthoides In
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.17.440253; this version posted April 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Reduced visitation to the buzz-pollinated Cyanella hyacinthoides in 2 the presence of other pollen sources in the hyperdiverse Cape 3 Floristic Region 4 5 Jurene E. Kemp1 6 Francismeire J. Telles2 7 Mario Vallejo-Marin1 8 1Biological and Environmental Sciences. University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA. United Kingdom 9 2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação de Recursos Naturais, Universidade 10 Federal de Uberlândia, Campus Umuarama, Bloco 2D, Sala 26, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil. 11 Abstract 12 Many plant species have floral morphologies that restrict access to floral resources, such as pollen or 13 nectar, and only a subset of floral visitors can perform the complex handling behaviours required to 14 extract restricted resources. Due to the time and energy required to extract resources from 15 morphologically complex flowers, these plant species potentially compete for pollinators with co- 16 flowering plants that have more easily accessible resources. A widespread floral mechanism 17 restricting access to pollen is the presence of tubular anthers that open through small pores or slits 18 (poricidal anthers). Some bees have evolved the capacity to remove pollen from poricidal anthers 19 using vibrations, giving rise to the phenomenon of buzz-pollination. These bee vibrations that are 20 produced for pollen extraction are presumably energetically costly, and to date, few studies have 21 investigated whether buzz-pollinated flowers may be at a disadvantage when competing for 22 pollinators’ attention with plant species that present unrestricted pollen resources. -
16 Artigo Dyckia Racinae.Indd 1 17/12/2014 10:21:23 398 DORNELES, M.P.; OLIVEIRA, DE J.M.S
Dyckia racinae L.B.Sm. (Bromeliaceae ): morphological description emphasizing the reproductive structures 397 Dyckia racinae L. B. Sm. (Bromeliaceae): morphological description emphasizing the reproductive structures 1 Mariane Paludette Dorneles2, João Marcelo Santos de Oliveira3 & Thais Scotti do Canto-Dorow 4 1 Parte da dissertação de Mestrado da primeira autora no Programa de Pós-graduação em Agrobiologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. 2 Programa de Pós-graduação em Agrobiologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. 3 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas, Departamento de Biologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Agrobiologia, Av. Roraima s/n, CEP 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil - [email protected] 4 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas, Departamento de Biologia, Av. Roraima s/n, CEP 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil. Recebido em 20.III.2014. Aceito em 8.X.2014. ABSTRACT – This study presents an analysis of the external morphology and anatomy, especially of the micromorphology of reproductive organs that are important for characterizing Dyckia racinae L.B.Sm. The presence of a parietal U-shaped thickening in the endothecium and in the connective differ from other Dyckia species. Characteristics of pollen grains and ovules, indicated by micromorphology of the sporoderm and structure of the chalazal appendix, respectively, are similar to other species, and useful for characterizing the genus. Preferences for rocky soils, besides leaf characteristics and infl orescence structure, approximate D. racinae to D. cabrerae Smith & Reitz in the main dichotomous keys for the genus. Considering that Dyckia racinae is endemic in Rio Grande do Sul, and that the original description of the species was proposed based on a single cultivated individual, it is clear that the characteristics described in the present study, based on individual species analyzed in their natural environment, are important botanical contributions. -
South Africa Cape Wildflowers, Birding & Big Game II 21St August to 3Rd September 2022 (14 Days)
South Africa Cape Wildflowers, Birding & Big Game II 21st August to 3rd September 2022 (14 days) Cape Mountain Zebras & wildflowers in West Coast NP by Adam Riley This comprehensive tour covers the most exciting regions of the Cape in our quest to experience both breathtaking displays of wildflowers and to track down some of the country’s endemic birds. We begin in the vibrant city of Cape Town, where Table Mountain provides a spectacular backdrop to the immensely diverse fynbos that cloaks the cities periphery. This fynbos constitutes the Cape Floral Kingdom – the smallest and richest of the world’s 6 floral kingdoms. It is also the only floral kingdom to be confined to the boundaries of a single country. Thereafter we venture to the West Coast and Namaqualand, which boast an outrageous and world famous floral display in years of good rains, before travelling through the heart of the country’s semi-desert region, focusing on the special bird’s endemic to this ancient landscape. We conclude the journey heading out of wildflower country to Augrabies Falls, an area offering unparalleled raptor viewing and a wide range of dry region birds. We invite you on this celebration of some of the finest wildflower and endemic birding that the African continent has to offer! RBT South Africa - Cape Wildflowers, Birding & Big Game 2 THE TOUR AT A GLANCE… THE ITINERARY Day 1 Arrival in Upington Day 2 Upington to Augrabies Falls National Park Day 3 Augrabies Falls National Park Day 4 Augrabies Falls National Park to Springbok Day 5 Springbok to Nieuwoudtville -
Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database. -
Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
BROMELI ANA PUBLISHED by the NEW YORK BROMELIAD SOCIETY1 (Visit Our Website
BROMELI ANA PUBLISHED BY THE NEW YORK BROMELIAD SOCIETY1 (visit our website www.nybromeliadsociety.org) November, 2014 Vol. 51, No. 9 THE WBC IN HAWAII - Updates and Corrections by Herb Plever My report of the World Conference in the October issue was silent about visiting a local grower. We were scheduled to visit Larry McGraw’s garden during our trip to Lyon Arboretum and Nu’uanu Pali overlook, but were advised that we had to skip the visit because our bus couldn’t make the steep turnaround on Lisa Vinzant’s unnamed Auction Neo. the narrow road up to the garden. (We were running There was a lot of suspense about the late.) beautiful, unnamed Neoregelia generously But I learned from the In Larry McGraw’s garden - what donated by Lisa Vinzant, but it had not yet been looks like Neo. ‘Fireball’ in the back, report in the East London Tillandsia streptophylla in the middle auctioned when I had to leave. Lisa had given the Bromeliad Society (South and Tillandsia xerographica in front. buyer the right to name the plant (subject to her Africa) Newsletter that approval). I have heard that the plant went for another bus did manage to visit Larry McGraw’s $600 but the purchaser likely believes that is a garden and the people were very impressed. The bargain for such an outstanding plant. The winner and adjacent photo is from that Newsletter. any name given the plant have not yet been We did not stay to the end of the Rare Plant confirmed. (See photo above.) Auction on Saturday night after the banquet, as we Two trees dominated the coastal landscape on had an early flight to Kona the next morning. -
Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld. -
A Visual Guide to Collecting Plant Tissues for DNA
A visual guide to collecting plant tissues for DNA Collecting kit checklist Silica gel1 Permanent marker and pencil Resealable bags, airtight plastic container Razor blade / Surgical scissors Empty tea bags or coffee filters Ethanol and paper tissue or ethanol wipes Tags or jewellers tags Plant press and collecting book 1. Selection and preparation of fresh plant tissue: Sampling avoided. Breaking up leaf material will bruise the plant tissue, which will result in enzymes being released From a single plant, harvest 3 – 5 mature leaves, or that cause DNA degradation. Ideally, leaf material sample a piece of a leaf, if large (Picture A). Ideally should be cut into smaller fragments with thick a leaf area of 5 – 10 cm2 should be enough, but this midribs being removed (Picture C). If sampling robust amount should be adjusted if the plant material is leaf tissue (e.g. cycads, palms), use a razor blade or rich in water (e.g. a succulent plant). If leaves are surgical scissors (Picture D). small (e.g. ericoid leaves), sample enough material to equate a leaf area of 5 – 10 cm2. If no leaves are Succulent plants available, other parts can be sampled such as leaf buds, flowers, bracts, seeds or even fresh bark. If the If the leaves are succulent, use a razor blade to plant is small, select the biggest specimen, but never remove epidermal slices or scoop out parenchyma combine tissues from different individuals. tissue (Picture E). Cleaning Ideally, collect clean fresh tissues, however if the leaf or plant material is dirty or shows potential contamination (e.g. -
'A New Subfamilial and Tribal Classification of Restionaceae
Briggs, B G; Linder, H P (2009). A new subfamilial and tribal classification of Restionaceae (Poales). Telopea, 12(3):333-345. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch University of Zurich Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. Zurich Open Repository and Archive http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Telopea 2009, 12(3):333-345. Winterthurerstr. 190 CH-8057 Zurich http://www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2009 A new subfamilial and tribal classification of Restionaceae (Poales) Briggs, B G; Linder, H P Briggs, B G; Linder, H P (2009). A new subfamilial and tribal classification of Restionaceae (Poales). Telopea, 12(3):333-345. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Telopea 2009, 12(3):333-345. Telopea 12(3) 333–345 A new subfamilial and tribal classification of Restionaceae (Poales) Barbara G. Briggs1 and H. Peter Linder2 1Botanic Gardens Trust Sydney, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia. Email: [email protected] 2Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerrstrasse 107, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland Email: [email protected] Abstract Restionoideae Link, with the newly described Sporadanthoideae and Leptocarpoideae, represent major clades of Restionaceae distinguished by analyses of chloroplast DNA data. These subfamilies are supported by features of morphology, culm anatomy, pollen and phytochemistry. Sporadanthoideae occur in Australia and New Zealand, Leptocarpoideae principally in Australia but with representatives also in New Zealand, New Guinea, Aru Islands, Malesia, Hainan Island and Chile, while Restionoideae are in sub-Saharan Africa and Madagascar. -
(Centrolepidaceae) in Australia
J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 15(1): 1-63 (1992) A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF CENTROLEPIS (CENTROLEPIDACEAE) IN AUSTRALIA D. A. Cooke Animal and Plant Control Commission of South Australia GPO Box 1671, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 Abstract Centrdepis in Australia is revised and twenty species are recognised. This revision is based on morphological features that are discussed in relation to the biology of the genus. One new species, C. curta, and a new subspecies, C. strigosa subsp. rupestris, are described and illustrated. The new combinations C. monogyna subsp. paludicola and C. strigosa subsp. pulvinata are made. Introduction Centrolepis is a genus of small annual and perennial monocots. It forms, with Aphelia and Gaimardia, the minor family Centrolepidaceae. The family has its main centre of diversity in Australia with 29 species; a few occur in New Zealand, south-eastern Asia and South America. The close affinity of the Centrolepidaceae to the Restionaceae, and its remoteness from the two genera segregated by Hamann (1976) as the Hydatellaceae, are widely recognised in contemporary systems of classification (Cronquist, 1981; Dahlgren & Clifford, 1982; Takhtajan, 1980). Taxonomic history The genus first became known from material of the near-coastal species sent to Europe by the early botanist-explorers and collectors. In 1770 Banks and Solander on the Endeavour collected specimens of Centrolepis, now referred to C. banksii and C. exserta, that they tentatively labelled as species of Schoenus (Cyperaceae). Labillardière (1804) based the new genus Centrolepis, which he placed under Monandria Monogynia in the Linnaean system, on a Tasmanian specimen. Robert Brown (1810), using Banks' and Solander's material and his own collections from the voyage of the Investigator around Australia in 1801-4, drafted manuscript epithets for a further twelve Centrolepis species. -
The Down Rare Plant Register of Scarce & Threatened Vascular Plants
Vascular Plant Register County Down County Down Scarce, Rare & Extinct Vascular Plant Register and Checklist of Species Graham Day & Paul Hackney Record editor: Graham Day Authors of species accounts: Graham Day and Paul Hackney General editor: Julia Nunn 2008 These records have been selected from the database held by the Centre for Environmental Data and Recording at the Ulster Museum. The database comprises all known county Down records. The records that form the basis for this work were made by botanists, most of whom were amateur and some of whom were professional, employed by government departments or undertaking environmental impact assessments. This publication is intended to be of assistance to conservation and planning organisations and authorities, district and local councils and interested members of the public. Cover design by Fiona Maitland Cover photographs: Mourne Mountains from Murlough National Nature Reserve © Julia Nunn Hyoscyamus niger © Graham Day Spiranthes romanzoffiana © Graham Day Gentianella campestris © Graham Day MAGNI Publication no. 016 © National Museums & Galleries of Northern Ireland 1 Vascular Plant Register County Down 2 Vascular Plant Register County Down CONTENTS Preface 5 Introduction 7 Conservation legislation categories 7 The species accounts 10 Key to abbreviations used in the text and the records 11 Contact details 12 Acknowledgements 12 Species accounts for scarce, rare and extinct vascular plants 13 Casual species 161 Checklist of taxa from county Down 166 Publications relevant to the flora of county Down 180 Index 182 3 Vascular Plant Register County Down 4 Vascular Plant Register County Down PREFACE County Down is distinguished among Irish counties by its relatively diverse and interesting flora, as a consequence of its range of habitats and long coastline. -
Chloroplast Genome Analysis of Angiosperms and Phylogenetic Relationships Among
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.078212; this version posted May 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Chloroplast genome analysis of Angiosperms and phylogenetic relationships among Lamiaceae members with particular reference to teak (Tectona grandis L.f) P. MAHESWARI, C. KUNHIKANNAN AND R. YASODHA* Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore 641 002 INDIA *Author for correspondence R. YASODHA, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore, India Telephone: +91 422 2484114; Fax number : +91 422 248549; e.mail: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.078212; this version posted May 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Availability of comprehensive phylogenetic tree for flowering plants which includes many of the economically important crops and trees is one of the essential requirements of plant biologists for diverse applications. It is the first study on the use of chloroplast genome of 3265 Angiosperm taxa to identify evolutionary relationships among the plant species. Sixty genes from chloroplast genome was concatenated and utilized to generate the phylogenetic tree. Overall the phylogeny was in correspondence with Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) IV classification with very few taxa occupying incongruous position either due to ambiguous taxonomy or incorrect identification. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were identified from almost all the taxa indicating the possibility of their use in various genetic analyses.