CORPS DEFENSIVE OP".RATI GNS ALONG the GARIGUANO, GARI, and HAPIDO RIVERS, 17-31 January 191&

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CORPS DEFENSIVE OP MS # R-?6 cO° "A 7 \ XI7 PAlTZEF; CORPS DEFENSIVE OP".RATI GNS ALONG THE GARIGUANO, GARI, AND HAPIDO RIVERS, 17-31 January 191& A Study Undertaken in Support of the Volume Salerno to Cassino UBRARY^^. by USACGSCFT l£AV£fWORlHf*WI' Philip A. Growl (OCMHt In Progress) Foreign Studies Branch Office of the Chief of Military History Washington, D«C« Kovoisber 1955 70 pages - . I MS # t-73 OT PAHZBR CORPS DEFE-BSIYE OPESATIOSS ALOIfG THE afilOLXABQ, GARX, AID R4PIIX) RIVSSS, lj - J1 JAIIUAST X9W** fable of Contents ' • Paga X..• Introduction*'• Historical Background 4*•*»•*».**.. 1 # II* Geraan Defensive Positions', Shs Bsrnhgrd &nd Custav Lines. Li. XXI* Organisation, 'Overall Strength end Chain of CoswtBd of SeraaR Forces in Italy...»+*«*•»*•••+ 8 IT. Hhs Situation at tha Eve of Allied Attack Against Gastsv' Line* #•#*•*•* * f * * •% # • « •* *'• » * # ***•»»#• * * * •* *#»#»***•*** '# • 16 At Serosa Order of Battle and Beplcrjssant of Troops, . 1? January 19MU *••*******•**«»#«•*# * v * *• * * * »• i * .* « • * • * *' 16 Esiimte of Allied Capabilities and Intentions*#**..*> 19 C* Beployasat ©f 8ema Reserves, 17 January 19H+- ' 25 4' Y. The- Attack by British 10 Corps against the Sarigli&ao Sirer see-tor# 17 - 25 January -19^*• • * * • * # » • *• • * * • #**»## • • 27 A. Crossing the Qsurigli&no, 17-18 January...•,*..«**«»*, 27 B. Gersoan Coimterjafflaroree*..**...»»»...***«».*.**•*.»*.. 32 C. Continuation, of 10 Corps attack and Sarsan Countsratt&ck..,.35 P. Ssrsis® Losses.• »»*»«»•.*•»•»»«»•»*»»»*»-«»»»»•*«*«»*»* 1*0 VI» XI (IS) Corps Attack against Sari and t&pido Pavers, • 20-21}. January.• 1*1 ¥11. Effect of . Allied landing at Ansio on Fighting along (hastef* Till. Combat Action on lor them Wing XI¥ Panzer Corps, 51 Overlays and hssm'ms Overlay Er. Is Gemsa Defense Lines in Italy,3& Orerlay 8r« 2s %XT Banger Corps, Baployiaant of foraes aad intelligence Estteate.15®. Overlay Hr# • % 9ii-th Birision Sector* 17 Jan !&«*.••••>*.: 26a • Overlay Hr» ut fema Units couth of liri Hirer, 21 January jSo. v ' Overlay Br» 3' 15th Panzer Orenadier Piris ion gee tor 20-C-5*"Jannary lv^4** *••.»••*•» »«%•«». «. * Ilia Overlay Sr. 6t 2X7 Panzer Corps-deploynant of -units, 51a Table of Contents (Cont'd) i^-ge Annex Nr. 1; Garisan Order of Battle 17 January 1944-.......... 62 Annex Nr. 2 j German Order of Battle 21 Jaira&ry 1944.«-»....... 63 Annex Kr. 3s' Strength. Report, Armor and Weapons of Gerssn Bivisiens. 64-70 [Notes OVERLAYS ABE INCLUDED ONLY IN. HISTORIAN*S AND AUTHOR'S COPY] m # a-78 *u I* Introduction; W Four aaonths had el&peed since the Allies had seca-ed their ' bsaehhead at Salerno arid started their advance north on the Italian mainland isrhsu, on 15 Jsauary ISMi* Allied troops reached the approaches to .the' G-ust&v lias. The Gus tav Lias represented th© "finallias of defease south of Sosa® at -rhioh the G-erci&n High, Cemasaad was determined to hold the Allies at bay. =? The- seeisioa to defend Southern Italy &nd to hold. Beam hairnet been iB&&® by Hitler until the fall of lyh3 sad found its formal ex­ pression in the aapointsasai of Field Marshal Albert Kesselring as CoEsaaader is Chief Suedwest on 6 loveaber 19^3** tfntil- then Hitler * Order, OberkosBaaado der Wehr&aoht. Wshrmohtf-ashrtsagsstab, Opsrationsahteiltaig (referred to hereafter as QKlfA'FSt/Op), Kr> 00&125/it5» 6 Sot b% ia Grmdsaetsliche Bef'ehle OKn/pB SITBDlg'S?,, - I9h2 - I9i4 ICRS H, Gr. C 75133/12]i for & translation of this order see Office of Kaval Intelligence* Fuehrer Directives sad Other Top-Lave1 Directives of the German Armed Forces^ 19lj2 *>. 19^5 (Referred to hereafter as CM I, Fuehrer Directives)« p. 103# The &m»n term B<%>grbefehlshaber Suedsrest." isrhich aay asari either the Coarsander in Chief Suedsrest or his headquarters, has been readered as "OB SUBIMEST1* -when it refers to the headquarters, end as "Cossander ia Chief Sue devest" when it refers to the person, fh© saxaa applies to other theater designations, e*g. OB SITED but CoroasiTtdor in Chief Sued. MS # R-78 had vacillated betp?sen Field Marshal Ersfia Hossel and Xesselring as his choicc for Ccsasanaer in Chief of the Italian Theater. Before - Koveisbsr 19h3 HOSBSI had. coissanded Army Group B la Horthern Italy •shilo Kessalring, as CoEEBander in Chief Sued,• directed operations Before the Italian Theater was united under OS SSHEwSST, the Gosa&nd in Southern Italy was designated OB SUSS. in Southern Italy. Both Kes&elring &ad -Btmrnl, independently of * each otter, received instructions from end reported directly to OBI, She two generals held rather divergent views on the Strategy to be followed in the defense of Italys Rosso©! considered it unwise to sake a stand in Southern Italy because of the resulting disadvantages of exposing Gerjaan forces to flanking attacks from the sea, -tying doss Gerssan reserves, and extended lines of coEmsxications. Eoransel had-also advocated giving on Southern Italy even before Allied lasd<» lags on the mainland, because of his distrust of the Italians. His appointment as Coasaandar in Chief of the Italian Theater had seeded like a foregone conclusion until October 19h3* Hitler began to waver, however, after the landings at Salerno as Kesselriag demon­ strated the fe&sability of defending Southern Italy. Trug to his reputation as an eternal optiaist, lesseiring had aiaiadaed danger of Italy*e defection and later, after-German forces had successfully coped with Italy1 s withdrawal frm the 7/ar -without giving up their firm grip on the country, he remained convinced -2. K r MS # E-78 that a line south of Hoase could be successfully defended* A mors southern Una ©f defease, Kesaelring and his supporters argued, had the advantage of keeping Allied boabera farther away from Serssany propsr, of reducing the likalyhood of an invasion of the Balkans, of shorter defense lines and better terrain for a defense in, 'depth# and, finally# of holding on to Ecsae the possession of which was con­ sidered,of greatest psychological isport. :Sesselrings8 appoinfeaat as Cosssander in Chief Suedwest, effee tire as of 21 Soyember 19h3* ended the arguzaent in his favor, while Rorsrasl vr&s reassigned to & different theater,* • . * * For details of the background preceding Sesselriag,s appoint­ ment see MS # 1-3, Kasselringts ApaoiBtasnt as Cosgasader in Chief Southwest ( Luoian Heichler ). «a£ rVrr^SFr ^ , s-tsmmzz- In September and October l$-k% vrhils Hitler held in abey&noe ME decision to whoEE/. to giTa. orerall conaand, Sesselring. was givaa en opportunity to demonstrate in practice 'what he. :preadBd in theory* Be r:&s indeed able to slow down the Allied advance to and beyond the Voltarao Hiver#. thereby gaining T&luabl© tiias for preparing asore per- isanent positions south of Sosss» The final line beyond Tshloh the Allies wsre not' to be permitted to advance# as specified by Hitler in his order appointing Kssselring Cczsmander in Chief Suadwest, wis to run approxiss&tely from Qaeta on the I^rrhenian Sea to Ortona on the Adriatic Sea, the shortest lins across the Italian Peninsula. -3- 1 * ; V MS # a-78 II. German Defease Positions; Ths Bernhard and Gustav Line The first Gernan defensive positions along the Tolturno^ and the soc&lled Barbara Line bofeeeri ths Yclturno and th© Garigllano a Hirers* were o£y ^japorary nature intended to delay, but not to stop xths Allied advance, The defensive line that «as to mark the end of withdrawals was ths called the Berahard Line by the C-eriaans and the ' Winter Line by the Allies. She position followed the loser v C-arigliano River, turned northeastsmrd toward Mign&no and San Pietro Infine, blocking the eatranes to the l&gaaao Gap — the ? natural approach to Cassino and the Liri Pdver valley. Farther to th® north it utilised the upper reaches of the Volturno Hirer, erossed the Male11a Magaif, turned east toward the Sangro Kivar and ran north of and parallel to S&agrc, reaching the Adriatic Sea Just i northeast of Foesaoesia. The- Allied drive reached the Bernhard Line in the southern (American Fifth Ansy) sector in Hovesiber and penetrated it in Deeesber and the first half of January# Anticipating the necessity of further withdrawals* Kesselring had given orders for new posi­ tions to be reeonnoitered to be used as a switch position to the southern and central sector of the Bernhard Line. Construction work on this line which caias to be called the Gustav Line, started on 11 Boveia&er 19h3* and its name ms applied to ths whole defensive * felg., AmQeoberkoamando 10 (referred to hereafter as Tenth Army) to OB SUED, 15 «ov h% in AOS 10, Iatf iiriegstsgebuoh Sr» III MS # H-78 Anlagen, II. - 1S.XI. 19^3 I CSS AOS.10, h2Q92A'U mteori^ including those sections which %?ers part of the original Bsrah&rd Line« The Gustav Lins, following the oourse of the Bsrnhard Line, started on the coast southwest of Minturao, curved ground'- the south­ ern slopes of the hills just south of Minturne, froxa'there it extend­ ed to the Garigliano River just east of that town,. It then followed the - river beyond the point where the Bernhard Line branched off, toward Eign&no, continuing along the west bank of the G&rigliano, Gsri* end Sapido rivers, through the town of G&ssino* through the Abrussi national Park, to & point just south of Alfed-eoa, where it ones more joined the Bsrshard Line,* • Is the northern sector# bordering on the Adriatic Sea, the Bemhard Line had been abandoned by the Ge-raaas soaatsfaat. earlier* By January the front line ran about halfsray betsaeen the abandoned Bernhardt Line and a newly prepared position called the Foro Line• The Poro Line reached the Adriatic a few kiloaeters southeast of Pesoara. Tenth Arsy Situation !aap (It 100 000), 17 Ijl** in AOIf 10, Ia» Kriegsta.p;ebuoh Sr.
Recommended publications
  • Steven H. Newton KURSK the GERMAN VIEW
    TRANSLATED, EDITED, AND ANNOTATED WITH NEW MATERIAL BY Steven H. Newton KURSK THE GERMAN VIEW Eyewitness Reports of Operation Citadel by the German Commanders Translated, edited, and annotated by Steven H. Newton DA CAPO PRESS A Member of the Perseus Books Group Copyright © 2002 by Steven H. Newton All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Designed by Brent Wilcox Cataloging-in-Publication data for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 0-306-81150-2 Published by Da Capo Press A Member of the Perseus Books Group http://www.dacapopress.com Da Capo Press books are available at special discounts for bulk purchases in the U.S. by corporations, institutions, and other organizations. For more information, please contact the Special Markets Department at the Perseus Books Group, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, or call (617) 252-5298. 12345678 9—05 04 03 02 CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Introduction xi PART 1 Strategic Analysis of Operation Citadel Eyewitness Accounts by German Commanders 1 Operation Citadel Overview by General of Infantry Theodor Busse APPENDIX 1A German Military Intelligence and Soviet Strength, July 1943 27 Armeeabteilung Kempf 29 by Colonel General Erhard Raus APPENDIX 2A Order of Battle: Corps Raus (Special Employment), 2 March 1943 58 APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Patton Photographs
    Fighting Patton Photographs [A]Mexican Punitive Expedition pershing-villa-obregon.tif: Patton’s first mortal enemy was the commander of Francisco “Pancho” Villa’s bodyguard during the Mexican Punitive Expedition. Left to right: General Álvaro Obregón, Villa, Brig. Gen. John Pershing, Capt. George Patton. [A]World War I Patton_France_1918.tif: Col. George Patton with one of his 1st Tank Brigade FT17s in France in 1918. Diepenbroick-Grüter_Otto Eitel_Friedrich.tif: Prince Freiherr von.tif: Otto Freiherr Friedrich Eitel commanded the von Diepenbroick-Grüter, 1st Guards Division in the pictured as a cadet in 1872, Argonnes. commanded the 10th Infantry Division at St. Mihiel. Gallwitz_Max von.tif: General Wilhelm_Crown Prince.tif: Crown der Artillerie Max von Prince Wilhelm commanded the Gallwitz’s army group defended region opposite the Americans. the St. Mihiel salient. [A]Morocco and Vichy France Patton_Hewitt.tif: Patton and Rear Admiral Henry Kent Hewitt, commanding Western Naval Task Force, aboard the Augusta before invading Vichy-controlled Morocco in Operation Torch. NoguesLascroux: Arriving at Fedala to negotiate an armistice at 1400 on 11 November 1942, Gen. Charles Noguès (left) is met by Col. Hobart Gay. Major General Auguste Lahoulle, Commander of French Air Forces in Morocco, is on the right. Major General Georges Lascroux, Commander in Chief of Moroccan troops, carries a briefcase. Noguès_Charles.tif: Charles Petit_Jean.tif: Jean Petit, Noguès, was Vichy commander- commanded the garrison at in-chief in Morocco. Port Lyautey. (Courtesy of Stéphane Petit) [A]The Axis Powers Patton_Monty.tif: Patton and his rival Gen. Bernard Montgomery greet each other on Sicily in July 1943. The two fought the Axis powers in Tunisia, Sicily, and the European theater.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fifth Army History
    FIFTH ARMY HISTORY 7 OCTOBER - 15 NOVEMBER 1943 Classification changed to hf autfaqwiy of AC of S, G-2, by --JtA»MJU-liS fcAY MSTROUPE 1st Lt Inf Ass't Custodian FTH ARMY STORY * * * " • * * * * PAfvrn Across theUolturno to thfWinter^ine ************ IAL ************* Registered Copy No. O»>O Lieutenant General MARK W. CLARK * , * commanding CONTENTS page CHAPTER I. APPROACH TO THE VOLTURNO i A. Terrain Before Fifth Army 2 B. Bnemy Use of Terrain 4 CHAPTER II. PLANS FOR THE CAMPAIGN 7 A. Enemy Forces and Their Positions 7 B. Allied Forces and. their Positions 10 1. British Forces 10 2. American Forces 10 C. Plans for Continuing the Campaign 10 1. 15th Army Group Strategy 10 2. Fifth Army Operations Instruction No. 5, 2 October .. 11 3. Fifth Army Operations Instruction No. 6, 7 October ... 12 4. Fifth Army Operations Instruction No. 7, 14 October ... 13 5. Fifth Army Operations Instruction No. 8, 20 October .. 14 CHAPTER III. THE FIRST VOLTURNO CROSSING 15 A. Plans for the Crossing 15 B. The Crossing of VI Corps, 13-14 October 16 1. Plans and Terrain 16 2. The Crossing of the 3d Division 17­ 3. The Crossing of the 34th Division 19 4. The Advance of the 45th Division 21 C. The Crossing of 10 Corps, 12-14 October 21 1. Plans and Terrain 21 2. The Assault of the 56 Division 23 3. The Crossing of the 7 Armoured Division 24 4. The Crossing of the 46 Division 24 D. Summary of the First Volturno Crossing 26 VII CHAPTER IV. CONSOLIDATING THE BRIDGEHEAD ....
    [Show full text]
  • Glantz Vol III Book 1 LATEST.Indd
    © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Contents List of Maps, Tables, and Illustrations ix Preface xv Selected Abbreviations xxi Part I. Soviet Strategic Planning 1. Framework for Disaster 3 Frustration 3 The Wehrmacht in November 1942 8 German Field Commanders 11 The Red Army in November 1942 12 Soviet Field Commanders 15 2. Soviet Strategic Planning: The Genesis of Plan Uranus 20 Who Formulated Plan Uranus? The Historical Debate 20 Competing Offensive Concepts 23 Triumph of the “Different Solution,” 1–13 October 31 Plan Uranus Takes Shape, 14–31 October 38 Final Preparations, 1–18 November 41 Reflections 50 3. Gathering the Troops: Soviet Order of Battle and the Uranus Plan 55 Regrouping Forces for the Counteroffensive 55 Soviet Order of Battle 58 The Uranus Plan 79 Front and Army Plans 93 4. The Balance of Opposing Forces on 18 November 127 Soviet Forces 127 Axis Forces and Defenses 131 The Correlation of Opposing Forces 165 Part II. The Uranus Counteroffensive 5. The Penetration Battle, 19–20 November 185 Preliminaries 185 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. viii Contents The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 19–20 November 192 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 20 November 248 6. The Encirclement Closes, 21–23 November 268 German Dilemmas on 21 November 268 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 21 November 271 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 21 November 288 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 22 November 299 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 22 November 323 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 23 November 337 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 23 November 358 The Situation Late on 23 November 369 German Dilemmas on 23 November 371 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 6Th Armee STALINGRAD 18 Nov 1942 ANNEX a (Task Organization)
    6th Armee STALINGRAD 18 Nov 1942 ANNEX A (Task Organization) 6th Armee Gen Friedrich PAULUS XIV Panzer Corps Gen HUBE 29th Infantry Division (Motorized), IV Corps MajGen LEYSER 100th Jager Infantry Division LtGen SANNE 16th Panzer Division LtGen von ANGERN 24th Panzer Division, LI Corps LtGen Arno von LENSKI 145th Artillery Regiment 177th SP Artillery Battalion 627th Artillery Battalion, 6th Armee 2nd Rocket Artillery Regiment, 6th Armee 51st Rocket Artillery Regiment, 6th Armee 53rd Rocket Artillery Regiment, 6th Armee 41st Engineer Battalion 45th Engineer Battalion XI Corps LtGen STRECKER 384th Infantry Division LtGen Eccard Freiherr von GABLENZ 44th Infantry Division LtGen Heinrich DEBOI 376th Infantry Division LtGen Alexander Edler von DANIELS IV Corps Gen JAENECKE 297th Infantry Division MajGen Moritz von DREBBER 371st Infantry Division LtGen Richard STEMPEL VIII Corps Gen HEITZ 76th Infantry Division LtGen Karl ROSENBURG 113th Infantry Division LtGen Hans Heinrich Sixt von ARMIN LI Corps Gen von SEYDLITZ-KURZBACH 71st Infantry Division LtGen Alexander von HARTMANN 79th Infantry Division 94th Infantry Division LtGen George PFEIFFER 295th Infantry Division MajGen Dr. Otto KORFES 305th Infantry Division MajGen Kurt OPPENLAENDER 389th Infantry Division MajGen Martin LATTMAN 14th Panzer Division Oberst Hans Freiherr von FALKENSTEIN 1 29th Infantry Division STALINGRAD 18 Nov 1942 ANNEX A (Task Organization) 29th Infantry Division (Motorized) MajGen LEYSER 15th Infantry Regiment (Motorized) I.15 IR II.15 IR III.15 IR 71st Infantry Regiment
    [Show full text]
  • MECHANIZED GHQ UNITS and WAFFEN-SS FORMATIONS (28Th June 1942) the GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES
    GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES Volume 4/II MECHANIZED GHQ UNITS AND WAFFEN-SS FORMATIONS (28th June 1942) THE GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES 1/I 01.09.39 Mechanized Army Formations and Waffen-SS Formations (3rd Revised Edition) 1/II-1 01.09.39 1st and 2nd Welle Army Infantry Divisions 1/II-2 01.09.39 3rd and 4th Welle Army Infantry Divisions 1/III 01.09.39 Higher Headquarters — Mechanized GHQ Units — Static Units (2nd Revised Edition) 2/I 10.05.40 Mechanized Army Formations and Waffen-SS Formations (2nd Revised Edition) 2/II 10.05.40 Higher Headquarters and Mechanized GHQ Units (2nd Revised Edition) 3/I 22.06.41 Mechanized Army Divisions - (2nd Revised Edition) 3/II 22.06.41 Higher Headquarters and Mechanized GHQ Units (2nd Revised Edition) 4/I 28.06.42 Mechanized Army Divisions - (2nd Revised Edition) 4/II 28.06.42 Mechanized GHQ Units and Waffen-SS Formations 5/I 04.07.43 Mechanized Army Formations 5/II 04.07.43 Higher Headquarters and Mechanized GHQ Units 5/III 04.07.43 Waffen-SS Higher Headquarters and Mechanized Formations IN PREPARATION FOR PUBLICATION 2007/2008 7/I 06.06.44 Mechanized Army Formations 2/III 10.05.40 Army Infantry Divisions 3/III 22.06.41 Army Infantry Divisions IN PREPARATION FOR PUBLICATION 01.09.39 Landwehr Division — Mountain Divisions — Cavalry Brigade 10.05.40 Non-Mechanized GHQ Units Static Units 22.06.41 Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Static Units 28.06.42 Higher Headquarters Army Divisions Static Units 04.07.43 Army Divisions Static Units 01.11.43 Mechanized Army Formations Mechanized GHQ Units Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Army Divisions Static Units Higher Headquarters 06.06.44 Mechanized GHQ Units Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Army Divisions Static Units Higher Headquarters 16.12.44 Mechanized Army Formations Mechanized GHQ Units Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Army Divisions Static Units Higher Headquarters 1939 – 45 Luftwaffen Ground Combat Forces 1944 – 45 The 1944 Brigades 1939 – 45 Organizational Handbook GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES by Leo W.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, Va
    GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA. No. 58. Records of German Field Commands: Corps (Part HI) The National Archives National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington: 1968 This finding aid has "been prepared by the National Archives as part of its program of facilitating the use of records in its custody. The microfilm described in this guide may be consulted at the National Archives, where it is identified as Microcopy No. T-31^. A price list appears on the last pages. Those desiring to purchase microfilm should write to the Publications Sales Branch. The National Archives, Washington, D.C. 20^08. Some of the papers reproduced on the microfilm referred to in this and other guides of the same series may have been of private origin. The fact of their seizure is not believed to divest their original owners of any literary property rights in them. Anyone, therefore, who publishes them in whole or in part without permission of their authors may be held liable for infringement of such literary property rights. GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA. No. 58. Records of German Field Commands: Corps (Part III) (X - XVII Corps) The National Archives National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington: 1968 R E E This Guide is one of a series of finding aids describing of these duties by the National Archives. All folders ac- the seized German records deposited in the National Archives. cessioned by the Heeresarchiv were assigned numbers in se- The series was initiated by the Microfilming Project of the quence and logged in by unit in the Potsdam Catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Record Copy to Be Retired When \\O Longer©Needed
    D J 739 MS # C-065a /? aao.C <- * - c.l Fgn MS English Copy GBEIMER_pIABY_MpjgES, 12 Aug 1942 - 12 Mar 1943 RECORD COPY TO BE RETIRED WHEN \\O LONGER©NEEDED flROPSRTY OF US ARMY HISTORICAL DIVISION HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY EUROPE FOREIGN MILITARY STUDIES BRANCH MS # C-065a Helmuth GREENER Ministerialrat Custodian of the War Diary in HITLER©S Headquarters (August 1939 - April 1943) NOTES on the Situation Reports and Discussions at HITLER©S Headquarters from 12 August 1942 to 1? March 1943 Translator: Werner METER Editor : LUCAS Reviewer : Lt. Col. VERNON HISTORICAL DIVISION EUROPEAN COl-iMAND MS # C~065 a FOBStfOBD This manuscript is part of a narrative history of events in the German Armed Forces Supreme Command Headquarters during World War II. The writer, Hell- Mith G-BSINM, was charged with writing the War Diary at that headquarters from August 1939 to April 22, 1942. He has based hie work on notes taken at various conferences, copies of final drafts for entry in the War Diary, copies of HIJLER©S directives, orders end documents he was able to save from destruction at great personal risk. With the aid of these sources and the trained mind and memory of a professional historian, he has presented a vivid picture of HITLilR© S method of com mand as well as his reaction to reverses end success and the various other factors which influenced de cisions in both the military and the political spheres. In addition to a general description of procedures in the supreme headquarters it includes details of or ganization and the composition of HITLER©S immediate staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Printing "Welcome"
    Rzhev ’42 – Designer Notes Table of Contents I. Design Notes A. Introduction B. German Order of Battle C. Soviet Order of Battle D. Weather E. Making the Scenarios II. The Scenarios A. Scenario List B. Scenario Overviews III. Operation Mars Revisited – by David Glantz Endnotes IV. German Military Abbreviations and Terms V. Bibliography A. Operational Books B. Order of Battle, and Organizational Books C. Unit Histories D. Map Books E. Archival Records Design Notes A. Introduction After reading David Glantz’s book "Zhukov’s Greatest Defeat", I became intrigued with this unknown, but major operation. According to Col Glantz, the Soviet forces used for Operation Mars, were substantially larger then the more well known Operation Uranus, the counterattack at Stalingrad. Two Soviet fronts, Kalinin and Western, seven Armies, consisting of 667,000 men and over 1900 tanks, attacked on 25 November 1942 with the goal of destroying the German 9th Army, pinching off the Rzhev salient, and eliminating the threat this salient posed to Moscow. By attacking in four directions, the Soviets planned on tying down what little mobile reserves the Germans had, and not allowing them to be deployed elsewhere. The battle was fought during blizzard-like snowstorms which, along with the poor terrain in the area, contributed mightily to the Soviet defeat. The Germans fought back hard, with a stubborn defense, their strong points holding out behind the Soviet lines, further complicating moving the second echelon offensive troops forward. Beside the two panzer divisions in reserve of 9.AOK (9th Army), the Germans were able to send three more panzer divisions, from Heersgruppe (Army Group) reserve, to halt the offensive and counterattack.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article a Double Scale Methodology to Investigate
    Hindawi Geofluids Volume 2018, Article ID 2937105, 12 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2937105 Research Article A Double Scale Methodology to Investigate Flow in Karst Fractured Media via Numerical Analysis: The Cassino Plain Case Study (Central Apennine, Italy) M. Lancia ,1 M. Saroli,1 and M. Petitta 2 1 Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy 2Department of Earth Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy Correspondence should be addressed to M. Lancia; [email protected] Received 20 June 2017; Revised 8 November 2017; Accepted 23 November 2017; Published 18 January 2018 Academic Editor: Mauro Cacace Copyright © 2018 M. Lancia et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A methodology to evaluate the hydraulic conductivity of the karst media at a regional scale has been proposed, combining pumping tests and the hydrostructural approach, evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of fractured rocks at the block scale. Obtaining hydraulic conductivity values, calibrated at a regional scale,anumericalfowmodeloftheCassinoareahasbeendeveloped,to validate the methodology and investigate the ambiguity, related to a nonunique hydrogeological conceptual model. Te Cassino plain is an intermontane basin with outstanding groundwater resources. Te plain is surrounded by karst hydrostructures that feed the Gari Springs and Peccia Springs. Since the 1970s, the study area was the object of detailed investigations with an exceptional density of water-wells and piezometers, representing one of the most important karst study-sites in central-southern Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Return, German Army, 30 April 1945
    German Army 30 April 1945 Army Group E (South East) LXIX z.b.V. Corps: Sturm Brigade Südost XV Cossack Cavalry Corps 1st Cossack Division 2nd Cossack Division 11th Luftwaffe Field Division XXI Mountain Corps: 22nd Volks Grenadier Division 369th Croatian Division 7th SS Mountain Division "Prinz Eugen" 41st Infantry Division 181st Infantry Division XV Mountain Division: 373th Croatian Division 639th Security Regiment LXXXXI z.b.V. Corps 104th Jager Division 20th Jager Regiment LXXXXVII z.b.V. Corps 237th Infantry Division 188th Mountain Division Remains/392nd Croatian Division Army Group South: Army Troops: 9th SS Panzer Division "Hohenstaufen" 9th Mountain Division (reforming) 2nd Panzer Army: LXVIII Corps: 71st Infantry Division 13th SS Mountain Division 118th Jäger Division "Handschar" XXII Mountain Corps: 297th Infantry Division Szentlaszlo Infantry Division I Cavalry Division: 23rd Panzer Division 3rd Cavalry Division 4th Cavalry Division 16th SS Panzer Grenadier Division "SS Reichsführer" 6th Army IV SS Panzer Corps Kampfgruppe 3rd Panzer Division Kampfgruppe 5th SS Panzer Division "Wiking" 14th SS Waffen Group (1st Ukranian) III Panzer Corps: 1st Volks Grenadier Division 1st Panzer Division 6th Panzer Army Army Troops: 1 117th Jäger Division I SS Panzer Corps 1st SS Panzer Division "Adolph Hitler" Kampfgruppe 356th Infantry Division 12th SS Panzer Division "Hitler Jugend" II SS Panzer Division: 3rd SS Panzer Division "Totenkopf" 48th Volks Grenadier Division 8th Army XXXXIII Corps: 96th Infnatry Division 48th Volks Grenadier Division
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Rome
    The Road to Rome A Flames of War campaign for the battles around Cassino and Anzio Cancon 2015 The Road to Rome Contents The Road to Rome .................................................................................................................................. 4 Players .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Timetable................................................................................................................................................. 4 Cost and Registration .............................................................................................................................. 4 Historical Background ............................................................................................................................. 5 Lists ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Exclusions and Restrictions................................................................................................................. 7 Divisional and Corp Support ................................................................................................................... 8 German Support .................................................................................................................................. 8 Allied Support .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]