DOCSLIB.ORG

1932-03-06 [P 12]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1932-03-06 [P 12] Was Gen. Charles Lee a Traitor? Hozv the Ouestion, Which Had Re- mained Unsettled Until 1856, Was Anszvered by Dis- covery of a L,ong- Hidden Document. BY R. WILTON MOORE. the time Charles Lee, who had held no higher rank in the British Army than lieutanent colonel, became a major general In the Army of the Revolution, until and even long after FROMhis death, opinion was much divided as to the value of his services to the cause of independence and whether or not he meritd the treatment he received after the battle of Monmouth. Following the battle, which occured on June 28, 1778, Lee, stung by the remarks made to him by Gen. Washington, when the latter i*en. H as tun (ilon at the battle of Monmouth. found the American forces retreating, engaged in a sharp correspondence with Washington, IT it not without significance that while in did not testify at the trial, and while it was Its genuineness. He suggested that perhaps and finally expressed a desire that a court-mar- I New York, Lee made a strenuous effort to going on carefully refrained from expressing George H. Moore, then Librarian of the New tial should be convened to pass on his con- bring about the appointment by Congress of an any opinion. But in a letter to Joseph Reed, York Historical Society, might purchase the duct; that, this being done, he was tried on official commission or committee to go there then president of the Congress, dated July, 1779, manuscript, which Moore did, and later in his three charges: (a) Disobedience of orders in and confer with him about matters he declared referring to Lee’s attack on him, Washington book on “The Treason of Lee” Moore not attacking the enemy; (b) misbehavior be- to be of the utmost importance, urging all says: “To be pursued, first under the mark of incorporated a facsimile copy of several pages fore the enemy “by making an unnecessary, “possible as expedition in the friendship and, when disguise would suit no of the manuscript, along with a copy of a disorderly and shameful retreat,” and (c) dis- expedition, crisis of affairs is of material con- longer, as an calumniator with mis- letter written by Lee to Gen. Gates on the very respect to the commander in chief by his let- present very open gross what was in his mind we representations and self-known falsehoods, day the former was captured, and the ters to him subsequent to the battle; that, sequence.” Precisely cannot we at least believe carries an which no can bear with authenticity of which is undisputed. In that heard the of a number know, though may alloy temper hfcving testimony large • • * hand wrote the he had of the success of the perfect composure: What cause, then, Is letter, written by the same that of Lee was found on the become hopeless witnesses, guilty a certain cause. we do know that on there for such a of venom unless plan, Lee says “entre nous great first and third as and American But profusion by charges exactly framed, an was That an act of in him to trial man is damnably deficient,” this being also on the second charge to the extent of March 29, 1778, it “Resolved. Congress public duty bringing still it to send of their at own solicitation I have him obvious reference to Washington. Lossing says “making an unnecessary and, in some few in- adjudge improper any his disappointed members to confer with Gen. Lee the and raised his that in of the plain: “The document was the first and was sentenced upon ire; or, conceiving pro- stances, disorderly retreat," of mentioned in his letter." It is a portion as he can darken the shades of my announcement to the world the long- “to be suspended from any command in the subjects character he his whether suspected fact that- Gen. Charles Lee was armies of the United States of North America rather curious coincidence that the date of that Illuminates own; cause which he I or motives more dark and hidden undoubtedly a traitor to the for the term of 12 months”; and that, although resolution corresponds with the apparent date these, say, yet him I shall not undertake to decide nor espoused.” the sentence was pronounced on August 12, of a document of pivotal interest to which govern The plan starts with the assertion tnat tne It did not receive the approval of the Con- reference ■will in a moment be made. have I time to inquire into them at present." But the time was to arrive for an and American cause had no chance of success, gress until December 5, having meanwhile As I have said, there was a sharp difference inquiry decision. In when the actors in the that continuance of the war would be wasteful been the subject of much debate in the ses- of opinion about the character and merits of 1856, Monmouth transaction had there and injurious to both combatants and that sions which were always held in secret. The Lee. There were Americans of ability and passed away, steps should be taken to bring it quickly to Congressional Journal shows that Rhode Island, patriotism, as, for example, Lighthorse Harry was brought to light the document to which an end. It then proposed that instead of be- New York, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, North Lee, who, notwithstanding they were devoted I have just alluded. Lossing, the eminent ing content with holding New York and tak- Carolina and South Carolina voted to sustain friends of Washington, retained their friend- historian, gives the story of how it came to be ing Philadelphia, 4,000 of the British troops, the sentence; that Massachusetts and Georgia ship for Lee, and were convthced that the uncovered. He states that in the Autumn of which at that time were supposed to total voted in the negative and that Virginia, court-martial sentence was far too severe. 1856 Mr. Tomlinson, a dealer In rare manu- Mary- about 20.000, should be sent south so as to re- land and New Jersey did not vote, as the mem- They thought that a mild punishment for fail- scripts, called on him in New York with duce Maryland, and prevent Virginia from bers present from each of those States were ing to give Washington timely notice of the manuscripts found among the papers of Gen. furnishing aid to the American Army in Penn- equally divided. So far as Virginia is con- disrespectful language hi Lee's letter to him Sir William Howe, who was the British sylvania. The transports carrying the British cerned, it appears that only two members would have been sufficient. But, on the other commander in chief at New York during a part troops southward were to disembark them at were present, Francis Lightfoot Lee, who voted hand, there were those who gravely doubted of the time of Lee's detention there. One of Annapolis and Alexandria, and the location “aye," and Meriwether Smith, who voted “no.” his fidelity, among them John Laurens, Presi- them was a manuscript consisting of nine of those points as suitable bases of operation On December 4, 1779, the to which dent of the Continental who of foolscap pages, folded in form for and Congress, Congress, spoke filing, was set forth. in the interval Lee had written an offensive him as “a Judas’’; Alexander Hamilton, who indorsed in the of handwriting Henry Strachey„ Lee had fairly full knowledge of conditions letter, resolved, “That Maj. Gen. Charles Lee spoke of him as a driveler or something worse,” the secretary of Gen. Howe, "Mr. Lee's plan, in Virginia. He knew it was the most pop- b* informed that has no further and Elias who him to 29th 1777.” Congress Boudinot, thought false March, ulous and the richest of the States, and that occasion for his services in the of the the cause. More than the At this document was Army important suspicion Lossing's request, left Washington greatly relied upon it for soldiers United States of America.” entertained by others is the fact that with him and it with known Washing- upon comparing and supplies. He was in Virginia after re- ton himself seems to have been He of he was It appears from the journal that the only suspicious. writings Lee, completely satisfied of ceiving his commission as major general, and States voting “no” on this occasion were Con- had been in Alexandria more than once, the necticut, New Jersey and Maryland, and that first time as a lieutenant in the army com- the only member present from Virgina, Cyrus- manded by Br&ddock which set out from that Griffin, was recorded in the negative. It was town on its fatal expedition. He was. there- necessary that a State should vote by at least Jore, able to tell of the depth of the river at two members. Alexandria, and suggest that other places on A moment may be taken to inquire what was the river south of the town could be made use the language actually used by Washington of if necessary. Lee concluded by stating, "I when he rode up to Lee and found a retreat am so confident of the event that I will in progress, of which everybody seems to have venture to assert with the penalty of my life. agreed the commander in chief should have If the plan is adopted and no accidents, such been given prompt notice. That his appear- as a rupture betwixt the powers of Europe, ance when he encountered Lee strongly in- intervene, that in less than two months from dicated his displeasure is left beyond doubt the date of the proclamation not a spark of by the evidence submitted at the trial, but that this desolating war remains unextinguished in he made use of any such language as several any part of the continent." writers have imputed to him is not proven.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • J. T. Ihamcy, the Mummd 4* of W E-Ofts (Now York 18), 18S the CONWAY CABAL
    . f /', / . ., e .5 - g vUAKY3 LADY DETAINIXQ tux ENGLIJS1 BEEXRAL J. T. Ihamcy, The Mummd 4* of W e-ofts (Now York 18), 18S THE CONWAY CABAL:. MYTH OR REALITY BY GLORIA E. BRENNEMAN' D URING the latter half of 1777 and the beginning of 1778 DWashington and his friends felt that certain men were plotting to remove Washington as commander-in-chief and to replace him with someone such as Horatio Gates. The Wash- ington men found proof of a cabal's existence in the actions and in the written and oral statements of men whom they believed were Washington's enemies. The cabal was named after its most verbal progenitor, Thomas Conway. Conway and the others involved later denied that they took part in any cabal. How- ever, most historians of the following century included the story in their volumes on the revolutionary period. In recent years some historians have pointed out that the evidence is not conclusive. Therefore, they deny the existence of any plot. As a result, a controversy has grown as to whether the Conway Cabal actually occurred. To understand why men turned against Washington, a look at the state of the nation from the fall of 1777 to the spring of 1778 is necessary. A feeling of apprehension spread through- out the nation in the fall, for Washington's army was unable to keep the British in check, the Continental Congress was fleeing from its meeting place, and Gates and his army were untested. Washington faced the British at Brandywine and Germantown and lost.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treachery of Charles Lee
    The Treachery of Charles Lee by Paul J. Burrow One of the most enigmatic military leaders of the American Revolution was the erratic and talented General Charles Lee. Born in Cheshire, England, Lee began his military career at the age of fourteen for the British and his brash and often abrasive attitude earned him many enemies that prevented advancement to the level he felt he deserved. He left England to serve as Chief of Staff under King Stanislaus Augustus until 1762 when he returned to England and was finally promoted to lieutenant colonel on half pay.1 By the time he returned to England, he had already developed strong anti-imperialist feelings towards King George III and the destruction of British liberty. Upon his arrival in America, he became a prolific pamphleteer for the burgeoning Independence cause. Lee quickly became one of the strongest voices for liberty and resigned his royal commission to accept appointment as second major general in the Continental army in June of 1775.2 Lee’s time in the Continental army was filled with controversy, some of which was not revealed until after his death. Appointed by Congress to command the American army in the southern military district, he repelled a British assault on Fort Moultrie and eventually joined General Washington in 1776.3 The interactions between Washington and Lee blossomed into a rivalry between the men that led to Lee’s demise. In December, Lee was taken captive by the British and held for the next sixteen months.4 It was during this time that Lee wrote letters to General Howe of the British army on how to win a swift and decisive victory over the revolutionaries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Weather on Armies During the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 The Force of Nature: The Impact of Weather on Armies during the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T. Engel Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE FORCE OF NATURE: THE IMPACT OF WEATHER ON ARMIES DURING THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1775-1781 By JONATHAN T. ENGEL A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2011 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Jonathan T. Engel defended on March 18, 2011. __________________________________ Sally Hadden Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Kristine Harper Committee Member __________________________________ James Jones Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This thesis is dedicated to the glory of God, who made the world and all things in it, and whose word calms storms. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colonies may fight for political independence, but no human being can be truly independent, and I have benefitted tremendously from the support and aid of many people. My advisor, Professor Sally Hadden, has helped me understand the mysteries of graduate school, guided me through the process of earning an M.A., and offered valuable feedback as I worked on this project. I likewise thank Professors Kristine Harper and James Jones for serving on my committee and sharing their comments and insights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Triumph of Britannia?
    CLASH OF EMPIRES: THE BRITISH, FRENCH & INDIAN WAR 1754 - 1763 CHAPTER 9 The Triumph of Britannia? FIER THE FALL OF NEW FRANCE and the stunning victories of the Seven Years' War, British officials turned their attention to the defense and administration of the newly enlarged American empire. For the first time, British leaders had to face the challenges of ruling large numbers of non-Protestant subjects. With 90,000 Catholic subjects in Canada, and at least 50,000 Native Americans (including perhaps 10,000 warriors) living east of the Mississippi River, a large military presence (7,500 regulars) seemed necessary. Rather than burdening British taxpayers, who had footed the enormous costs of the war, Great Britain now expected American colonists to pay for their own defense. At the same time, Parliament enacted a series of measures to centralize colonial administration and enforce trade laws. Once treated as imperial partners rather than dependents by the wartime administration of William Pitt, many American colonists bristled at what they believed was a systematic effort to deprive them of their British liberties. The burst of pro-British patriotic fervor that had briefly spanned the Atlantic Ocean quickly gave way to protests and recriminations. BRITONS OR AMERICANS? The 1765 Stamp Act and the colonial protests that followed have long been viewed as the first steps leading to the American Revolution. The decade that ended in April 1775 with the outbreak of rebellion in Massachusetts would be better characterized as a struggle to define the relationship between mother country and colonies rather than a drive for independence.
    [Show full text]
  • 123562525-The-Common-Necessaries
    “The common necessaries of life …” A Revolutionary Soldier’s Wooden Bowl John U. Rees Dedicated to the late Sally Paxson Davis for her kindness and generosity in sharing a family treasure. Artifacts connected to an individual Revolutionary War common soldier are rare, especially personal items like the mess bowl recently donated to Solebury Township Historical Society, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. That receptacle, belonging to an anonymous soldier, was left in the hands of a Solebury Township family, and passed from generation to generation down to the present–day. Having learned of its existence several years ago, in 2007 I was fortunate enough to learn the bowl’s whereabouts and arrange to examine it in person. At the time of the War for American Independence the village of Aquetong , also known as Paxson’s Corner, was on the York Road, nearly midway between Lahaska and the Great (Ingham’s) Spring (Solebury Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania., present– day Route 202/York Road and Aquetong Road, about 4 miles west of New Hope/Coryell's Ferry). “Rolling Green” the “fine Colonial mansion,” still to be seen on the north side of York Road, was owned by Benjamin Paxson at the time of the War for Independence. Paxson family history notes that, “a soldier, who was taken ill and died there after the army had moved on, was buried on the Paxson property.” In 1926 Henry D. Paxson told of ‘a relic preserved by the Paxson family … a wooden bowl left by a Continental soldier from a southern State, who had been taken ill with a fever and was nursed by the family [until his death].” The incident may have occurred during the Monmouth campaign, Henry Paxson claiming that Maj.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina in the American Revolution
    South Carolina in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati South Carolina in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati Anderson House Washington, D. C. October 21, 2004 – April 9, 2005 his catalogue has been produced in conjunction with the Texhibition South Carolina in the American Revolution on display from October 21, 2004, to April 9, 2005, at Anderson House, Headquarters, Library and Museum of the Society of the Cincinnati, 2118 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20008. The exhibition is the eighth in a series focusing on the eft mainly to her own resources, contributions to the American Revolution made by the original it was through bloodshed thirteen states and the French alliance. L and devastation and the depths Generous support for this exhibition was provided by the of wretchedness that [South Carolina’s] Society of the Cincinnati of the State of South Carolina. citizens were to bring her back to her place in the republic by their own heroic courage Also available: and self devotion, having suffered more, Massachusetts in the American Revolution: “Let It Begin Here” (1997) New York in the American Revolution (1998) and dared more, and achieved more New Jersey in the American Revolution (1999) than the men of any other state. Rhode Island in the American Revolution (2000) Connecticut in the American Revolution (2001) — George Bancroft, (2002) Delaware in the American Revolution History of the United States (1857) Georgia in the American Revolution (2003) Text by Ellen McCallister Clark Front cover illustration: Captain Jacob Shubrick by Henry Benbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Henry Lee Papers 1763-1823 Mss.B.L51
    Richard Henry Lee Papers 1763-1823 Mss.B.L51 American Philosophical Society 2003 105 South Fifth Street Philadelphia, PA, 19106 215-440-3400 [email protected] Richard Henry Lee Papers 1763-1823 Mss.B.L51 Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 Background note ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Scope & content ..........................................................................................................................................7 Administrative Information .........................................................................................................................8 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Indexing Terms ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Other Finding Aids ................................................................................................................................... 10 Other Descriptive Information ..................................................................................................................10 Bibliography ..............................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton: an American Musical
    1 Selections from: Hamilton: An American Musical th Oklahoma 8 Grade U.S. History Standards Alignment with end notes by Aaron Baker page Standards in Order in Which they Appear 2 Standards in Chronological Order 3 “Alexander Hamilton” 4 “Aaron Burr, Sir” 5 “My Shot” 6, 7 “Schuyler Sisters” 7-9 “Farmer Refuted” 9 “You’ll Be Back” 9, 10 “Right Hand Man” 10-12 “Stay Alive” 12, 13 “Guns and Ships” 14 “Yorktown (The World Turned Upside Down)” 14-16 “Non-Stop” 16-19 “What’d I Miss” 19, 20 “Cabinet Battle #1” 20, 21 “Cabinet Battle #2” 21, 22 “One Last Time” 22, 23 “The Adams Administration” 23 “The Election of 1800” 23-25 endnotes 26 OK Standards In Order In Which They Appear 2 2.2 Motivations & Choices B. the Coercive Acts of 1774 (the Intolerable Acts) as British Compare and contrast the different motivations and choices punishment for the Boston Tea Party and the convening of that various colonial populations had regarding the War for the First Continental Congress as a colonial response. Independence including 1.1 Consequences of the French & Indian War A. Whether to fight for independence, remain loyal to the Summarize the political and economic consequences of the king, or to be neutral. French and Indian War on the 13 colonies including the 1.3 Ideological War imperial policies of requiring the colonies to pay a share of Cite specific textual and visual evidence to analyze the the costs of defending the British Empire. ideological and propaganda war between Great Britain and 2.3 Key Military & Diplomatic Events her North American colonies including the Cite specific textual and visual evidence to summarize the A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tour of the Generals' Quarters
    Excerpted from Vol. 49 No. 1-2 of the Tredyffrin Easttown History Quarterly A Tour of the Generals’ Quarters Mike Bertram and Tim Lander he Valley Forge encampment of December 1777 – June 1778 has been a favorite topic of the Quarterly Tsince it commenced publication in 1937. The residences of the generals, in particular, has been addressed on multiple occasions, starting with the fifth issue of the first volume, published in October 1938. A story in that issue recounts a field trip undertaken by members of the Tredyffrin Easttown History Club in the prior year. Such trips were common during that era of the club, when membership was much smaller than today and the logistics of traveling as a group were less daunting. On this occasion, the members toured the sites of the officers’ quarters, following the route depicted by the map on the opposite page. The October 1938 article pro- vided a brief description of each stop on the tour, as in the following excerpt, which picks up after stop #4, Stirling’s Quarters: 5. Continue on Yellow Springs road to west border of Senator Knox's estate, turn right on Wilson road, cross creek bridge, Maj. Gen. Lafayette's quarters on the right. #5 on map. (Then home of Sam- uel Havard, now of Harry Wilson. Marquis de Lafayette and his staff occupied two rooms, but not constantly.) 6. Continue on the Berwyn or Wilson road to top of rise, turn left on private land. Brig. Gen. Dupor- tail's quarters on left. #6 on map. (Then home of John Havard, now Pennsylvania University Farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary War Bibliography
    G. Kurt Piehler Center for the Study of War and Society, Department of History, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee Revolutionary War Bibliography Organization of American Historians and National Park Service 9/12/2003 The Broad Overview Even before the Revolutionary War ended in 1783, Americans and their British adversaries began efforts to document this struggle. Many of these early histories have been reprinted in modern editions and offer insights into how the Revolutionary generation saw the struggle for independence. Among the earliest general accounts of the conflict are David Ramsay’s History of the American Revolution (1789, Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1990) and Mercy Otis Warren’s three volume History of the Rise, Progress, and Termination of the American Revolution (1805, Indianapolis, Liberty Classics, 1988). A substantial number of Americans remained loyal to the British Crown, John Adams estimated the number as high as one-third of the population, and Peter Oliver’s Origins and Progress of the American Revolution (1781, San Marino: Huntington Library, 1961) wrote one of the earliest histories from the loyalist perspective. 1 There are several excellent general histories of the Revolutionary War. Among the best are Robert Middlekauff, The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 (New York: Oxford University Press,1982) and Edward Countryman’s The American Revolution (New York: Hill and Wang, 1985). Ray Raphael, A People’s History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence (New York: New Press, 2001) account offers a narrative account that centers around the participation of laborers, African Americans, women, and Indians during the war for independence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Monmouth
    i\/ew Jerse_y 's Revolutionm~v J:,Y.:perience The Battle of Monmouth SAMUEL S. SMITH New Jersey Historical Commission NEW JERSEY'S REVOLUTIONARY EXPERIENCE Larry R. Gerlach, Editor This series of publications is dedicated to the memory of Alfred E. Driscoll, gouemor of New Jersey from 1947 to 1954, in grateful tribute to his lifelong support of the study and teaching of the history of New Jersey and the United States. He was a member of the New Jersey Historical Commission from 1970 until his death on March 9, 1975. The Battle of Monmouth SAMUEL S. SMITH New Jersey Historical Commission Ubiuy of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Smith, Samuel Stelle. The Battle of Monmouth. (New Jersey's Revolutionary experience; 25) Bibliography: p. SUMMARY: Traces the events of the Revolutionary War battle at Monmouth during which it is believed Molly Pitcher aided the soldiers. 1. Monmouth, Battle of, 1778. [1. Monmouth, Battle of, 1778. 2. United States-History-Revolution, 1775-1783. 3. New Jersey-His­ tory-Revolution, 1775-1783] I. Title. II. Series. E263.N5N78 no. 25 [E241M7] 974.9'03s [973.3'34] 76-14860 Price: $.50 Designed by Peggy Lewis and Lee R. Parks Copyright "1975 by the New Jersey Historical Commission. All rights re· served. Printed in the United States of America 1HE NEW JERSEY HISTORICAL COMMISSION is an official agency of the state of New Jersey, in the division of the State Library, Archives and History, Department of Education. Fred G. Burke, Commis­ sioner, Ralph H. Lataille, Deputy Commissioner. 113 West State Street Trenton, NJ 08625 John T.
    [Show full text]
  • NJS: an Interdisciplinary Journal Summer 2016 143 Charles Lee: Self Before Country Dominick Mazzagetti Rutgers University Press
    NJS: An Interdisciplinary Journal Summer 2016 143 Charles Lee: Self Before Country Dominick Mazzagetti Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick and London, 2013 304 pages, 1 illustration, 1 map Hardcover, $32.95 ISBN: 9780813562377 Renegade Revolutionary: The Life of General Charles Lee Phillip Papas New York University Press: New York and London, 2014 410 pages, 41 halftones, 5 maps Hardcover, $40.00 ISBN: 9780814767658 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14713/njs.v2i2.56 For eight years at a former job, my office sat around the corner from Emanuel Leutze’s “Washington Rallying the Troops at Monmouth” (1857), and for eight years I listened as docents told the tale of how second-in-command General Charles Lee blatantly ignored George Washington’s order to lead an advance detachment against the British, and instead called a retreat. The painting depicts the pivotal moment where Washington arrived with the main body of troops and, seeing the disorderly retreat, bellowed at Lee, “causing the leaves to shake on the trees” as one witness would later remark. Hero Washington sat proudly atop his trusty steed Nelson, sword held high, jaw set, and confidently ordered the retreating men to reverse and fight. Huzzah for the great General whose leadership restored morale and order and drove off the British as they retreated to Sandy Hook in what would become the American Revolution’s largest land battle. In the middle of it all slouched a cowardly Lee astride his horse, dejected and humiliated; a failure and an incompetent who single-handedly nearly lost the war for independence. Leutze was known for painting idealized scenes of historical significance decades after they occurred, as seen through the gauzy haze of time, but the actual circumstances surrounding this incident have been in debate for over two centuries.
    [Show full text]