DOCSLIB.ORG

Prevent a Catastrophic Great Lakes Oil Spill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prevent a Catastrophic Great Lakes Oil Spill Prevent a Catastrophic Great Lakes Oil Spill To the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Michigan Agency for Energy, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Michigan Governor, Michigan Attorney General, and Michigan Pipeline Safety Advisory Board: I am writing to submit my official comment in response to the State of Michigan’s Line 5 final alternatives analysis dated October 26 and released on November 20. I am deeply disappointed in this final analysis. A draft alternatives report released in June was riddled with errors and omissions, and the final report contains most of the same failures. This report fails to meet its overall purpose of “providing the State of Michigan and other interested parties with an independent, comprehensive analysis of alternatives to the existing Straits Pipelines, and the extent to which each alternative promotes the public health, safety, and welfare and protects the public trust resources of the Great Lakes.” It lacks credibility because its author is Dynamic Risk, a firm with ties to Enbridge, the Canadian energy transport company that owns Line 5. Even worse, it absurdly underestimates the impact of a spill and ignores a viable alternative to Line 5 – use of existing infrastructure. An independent expert review in December 2015 documented the practicality of this alternative. Decommissioning Line 5 in the Straits of Mackinac is the only alternative that will prevent an oil spill with catastrophic consequences for the Great Lakes and the State of Michigan. Moreover, this final alternative report affirms that decommissioning is a feasible option with zero risks to the Great Lakes and minimal economic impacts to Michigan customers (e.g., two cents more at the gas pump and roughly 10 to 25 cents more for propane in the Upper Peninsula). It is time for the state to reject the flawed study, exercise its affirmative legal duty as public trustee of the Great Lakes and bottomlands, and shut down Line 5. The state should use that authority to revoke the 1953 easement agreement that Enbridge has consistently violated. The risk of a spill is too great to allow Line 5 to continue to operate in the Great Lakes. Our state government should not put the Great Lakes, our economy, health, drinking water, fisheries, and way of life at risk from a catastrophic oil spill any longer. In fact, on November 16, the Coast Guard Coast commandant testified again to Congress that his agency is not prepared to clean up a large-scale pipeline oil spill in the Great Lakes. I urge you to act as public trustees of our waters and bottomlands, enforce the easement in light of Enbridge’s ongoing violations, and begin the process of decommissioning Line 5 in the Straits of Mackinac to protect the Great Lakes from a catastrophic oil spill. The State of Michigan has a legal duty to take this enforcement action. Enbridge’s ongoing violations cannot be remedied. It is time for the state to act decisively and with urgency. Specifically, the report on alternatives to Line 5 in the Mackinac Straits: 1. Fails to follow the recommendations and standards outlined in the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report, which resulted from a process created by the governor and co-chaired by the attorney general, and therefore cannot be used by the State of Michigan “in making decisions about the future of the Straits Pipelines.” 2. Neglects to provide the state with an independent, fair analysis of the alternatives to Line 5 as required by the Task Force Report. This final report remains biased toward allowing Line 5 to continue to operate and/or allowing Enbridge to build new oil infrastructure in the Straits of Mackinac and further expand its operations. That bias grows out of past, and potentially future, business relationships between Enbridge and the report’s authors. 3. Fails to analyze existing pipeline infrastructure as an alternative to Line 5 in the Straits, which the state required Dynamic Risk to analyze, and leaving it out conflicts with Task Force recommendation 3 (b). It is unacceptable that the contractor eliminated this alternative without any analysis. The 1953 easement granted with strict conditions by the state to Enbridge does not guarantee transport of 540,000 barrels per day (bpd) of oil and natural gas liquids. In fact, the 1953 MPSC Order states 300,000 bpd, which means Enbridge is currently operating Line 5 at 80 percent over design capacity. 4. Fails to analyze new evidence disclosed by Enbridge affecting the pipeline’s integrity, including external corrosion, 48 bare metal spots caused by the installation of screw anchors, compromised cathodic protection, and historic excessive pipeline spans greater than the 75-feet limit (including a 286-foot span that was unsupported for years), as required by the legal operating agreement with the State of Michigan. Dynamic Risk’s rationale, in part, is that "it would be inappropriate to speculate on any of the above aspects of the coating condition." 5. Fails to consider tribal sovereign treaty rights and feedback on the basis that Dynamic Risk was not a party to tribal and state consultations, which is an unacceptable dismissal of input by a key stakeholder. 6. Grossly underestimates the total economic spill costs at between $147 million and $310 million, when Enbridge’s cleanup costs of its 2010 Line 6B pipeline oil spill along a 40-mile stretch of the Kalamazoo River cost more than $1.2 billion. 7. Overestimates an impact to propane supply, greatly exceeding what independent experts have determined would be necessary to provide the Upper Peninsula’s Rapid River facility with an alternative supply. The flawed report finds that up to 35 railcars per week or 15 truckloads per day would be necessary, while another study found it would take only one railcar or 3 - 4 truckloads per day to replace the Line 5 propane supply to the U.P. 8. Continues to show an unfair bias towards building a tunneled pipeline in the Mackinac Straits. The report estimates a much lower cost for a tunnel than other estimates for this type of infrastructure; it fails to consider the risk of a spill to the Great Lakes, rivers and streams from other portions of the 64-year-old pipeline if the Straits portion were rebuilt. Dynamic Risk prefers new pipelines, which was evident when the firm aggressively promoted building a tunnel in its proposal to do this report, and its analysis is deeply flawed. Submitted December 22, 2017 The following signatures were collected via oilandwaterdontmix.org. Total signature count: 5,973 Total Signatures: 5,973 Signatures on Submit Your Line 5 Comment - oilandwaterdontmix.org name state countryadditional comments 1 Liz Kirkwood MI US 2 Alee Johnson US Hello, Im from Green Bay, and I very much would like to get line 5 shut down ASAP as well. Not just reading about exterior issues with the pipeline, but what about the interior integrity of it? With a 64 year old line, what about stress cracks and inner wear and tear? We're very fortunate to have the Great Lakes along with its eco system, and from what i have read abroad about this line, it obviously needs to be shut down. Be responsible.. stop and replace it in a non threatening environment! 3 Mitchell McNeil IL US There's no level of risk that is acceptable in this very unique situation. Zero. Decommission Line 5 immediately. No more talk. No more studies. No more running out the clock. No more lies. No more b.s. - please! 4 Bonnie Weise US 5 Emily Griffith IN US 6 William Burdett MI US 7 William Clements MI US The track record of Enbridge (spills, cover ups) and enormous risks to all of Michigan from this aging and unnecessary pipeline make this a no-brainer. What conceivable advantage to their constituents do the Michigan officials see in allowing this risk to continue another day? Please act to protect our greatest natural resource. 8 Michael Salgat MI US Keeping Line 5 operational is not worth the risk to our drinking water, our health and the livelihood of the many small businesses dependent on the Great Lakes for tourism revenue. Please shut it down now. 9 Mark Bradley WI US 10 Myles Amor MI US 11 Megan Dykema MI US Love Lake Michigan and keep her safe 12 Phillip Mikesell MI US 13 Yaloda Dye MI The unthinkable willhappen if this line goes thru, instead lets turn to alternative fuels that willnot DEATROY 205 OF THE WORLDS FRESH WATER ALONG WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF MICHIGAN'S LUCRITIVE FISHING. 14 Abby Keessen IN US 15 Barbara Hopkins MI US Please don't let this be another win for big oil. We have such precious resources-we need to protect them! 16 Phil Young IL US 17 Jason Moritz MI US This is America, right? We see something's busted and we shut it down and fix it. Line 5 is busted. Shut it down and fix it! 18 Eli Potter AZ US 19 Jeff Brady MI US 20 Silas Bialecki MI US 21 Ruxandra-Ana Iacob MI US 22 Donald Erskine MI US Shut down line 5. End violation of Native Treaties 23 Laurie Blacker MI US Laurie Blacker 24 Heather Hewett AZ US 25 Helen and Mike MI US We must not continue to expose the Great Lakes to the destruction this pipeline will likely cause. Lambert 26 Mark Hopkins DE US Please act now to protect the Great Lakes! 27 Gregory Culley US 28 Elizabeth Leclerc MI US M.S. in Environmental Science here: shut down line 5. The pipeline is not worth risking the health and viability of Michigan waterways.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives
    Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 1 2 Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California: Quality Careers—Cleaner Lives Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 3 About the Author Peter Philips (B.A. Pomona College, M.A., Ph.D. Stanford University) is a Professor of Economics and former Chair of the Economics Department at the University of Utah. Philips is a leading economic expert on the U.S. construction labor market. He has published widely on the topic and has testified as an expert in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, served as an expert for the U.S. Justice Department in litigation concerning the Davis-Bacon Act (the federal prevailing wage law), and presented testimony to state legislative committees in Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah, Kentucky, Connecticut, and California regarding the regulations of construction labor markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Cruise Great Lakes of North America
    Great Lakes of North America From 9/25/2022 From Milwaukee Ship: LE BELLOT to 10/2/2022 to Toronto Set sail with PONANT aboard Le Bellot for an 8-day cruise discovering the Great Lakes of North America, in the heart of a flamboyant nature full of the colours of the Indian summer. You will leave from Milwaukee, in the US state of Wisconsin, the beginning of your voyage following the footsteps of the first settlers, trappers and Native Americans, before a lovely sailing experience on Lake Michigan, a veritable inland sea. The next lake, Lake Huron, boasts a myriad of islands in its northern part, with white rocks capped with conifers plunging into the sapphire waters of the lake. Sumptuous landscapes unveil multiple original panoramas, in particular near Flowerpot Island*, which you will be able to approach by Zodiac®. You will also discover the charming city of Parry Sound, in the heart of the wonderful UNESCO Biosphere Reserve of Georgian Bay. Le Bellot will then sail the canal connecting Lake Erie to Lake Ontario. From this call in Port Colborne, you will be able to see the impressive sight of Niagara Falls. These three powerful waterfalls, renowned the world over, are an exquisite natural spectacle. To round off your cruise, you will sail along the shimmering waters of Lake Ontario before making your way to the cosmopolitan city of Toronto, where you will disembark. * Zodiac® cruise weather dependant. The information in this document is valid as of 10/1/2021 Great Lakes of North America YOUR STOPOVERS : MILWAUKEE Embarkation 9/25/2022 from 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Departure 9/25/2022 at 6:00 PM Nested on the shores of Lake Michigan,Milwaukee , the largest city in the State of Wisconsin, harmoniously combines tradition and modernity.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Cal.2D 677, 15646, Hillside Water Co. V. Los Angeles /**/ Div.C1
    10 Cal.2d 677, 15646, Hillside Water Co. v. Los Angeles /**/ div.c1 {text-align: center} /**/ Page 677 10 Cal.2d 677 76 P.2d 681 HILLSIDE WATER COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation) et al., Appellants, TOWN OF BISHOP (a Municipal Corporation) et al., Interveners and Respondents. L. A. No. 15646. Supreme Court of California February 16, 1938 In Bank. Page 678 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Page 679 COUNSEL Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, James M. Stevens and S. B. Robinson, Assistant City Attorneys, Carl A. Davis, Deputy City Attorney, and T. B. Cosgrove for Appellants. Thomas C. Boone, Glenn E. Tinder, Preston & Braucht, John W. Preston and Preston & Preston for Respondents. OPINION SHENK, J. On May 9, 1931, the plaintiff Hillside Water Company, a corporation, filed a complaint in the Superior Court in and for the County of Inyo, seeking to enjoin the defendants, City of Los Angeles, and its Board of Water and Power Commissioners from "flowing, pumping, or otherwise exporting any of the waters" from any of the defendants' water wells located on the defendants' lands overlying the underground basin known as the Bishop-Big Pine Basin in Inyo County, and from diverting and transporting any of the waters from said basin to any place or land not overlying said basin. The Bishop-Big Pine Basin comprises an area of about 95,000 acres. It is located in [76 P.2d 683] the Owens River water shed and is bounded (approximately) on the north by the northerly boundary of Inyo County, on the east by the Inyo Mountains, on the south by Tinnemaha dam, which is about seven miles south of the town of Big Pine, and on the west by the Sierra Nevada, a mountain range.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover What Inspires You
    Discover what inspires you MIDDLE & UPPER SCHOOLS GREENHILL STUDENTS are studious and high-achieving. THEY LEARN A LOT HERE, AND THEY LEARN IT WELL. But that’s not all that makes them special. Drawn to the unknown and motivated from within, they’re INQUISITIVE, PURPOSEFUL, AND BOLD in their quests for knowledge. With EQUAL PARTS GRIT AND JOY, they ask questions that lead to more questions, analyze critically, and unearth the why. FEARLESS AND OPEN-MINDED, they’re not afraid to make mistakes, explore spaces without boundaries, and be themselves. KIND AND COMPASSIONATE, they sharpen their minds and soften their hearts, learning not only for their own good, but for the good of others. TENACIOUS AND RESILIENT, they constantly give their all, developing personal strengths for lifetimes of success. Success they define themselves. They are inspired. They are inspiring. And it all begins right here, at Greenhill. Are you… naturally curious? energized by challenges? motivated? willing to try new things? open to making new friends? interested in solving problems? collaborative? caring and compassionate? happy to be yourself? passionate about life and learning? a fan of roaming peacocks? Yes? Then you belong at Greenhill. We seek excellence in everything we do. We’re that rare school that fully commits its resources and talents to a balanced program in academics, arts, and athletics. An inclusive community since its founding, Greenhill celebrates diversity in all its forms and welcomes the curious, inquisitive learner. SCOTT GRIGGS, HEAD OF SCHOOL 2 Unearth the Why Learning isn’t about memorizing facts and acing tests. That’s why Greenhill students achieve so much more than high grades and scores.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Solar Community Energy Storage for Supporting Hawaii's 100% Renewable Energy Goals Erin Takata [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-19-2017 Analysis of Solar Community Energy Storage for Supporting Hawaii's 100% Renewable Energy Goals Erin Takata [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Part of the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Recommended Citation Takata, Erin, "Analysis of Solar Community Energy Storage for Supporting Hawaii's 100% Renewable Energy Goals" (2017). Master's Projects and Capstones. 544. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/544 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This Master's Project Analysis of Solar Community Energy Storage for Supporting Hawaii’s 100% Renewable Energy Goals by Erin Takata is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in Environmental Management at the University of San Francisco Submitted: Received: ...................................……….. ................................………….
    [Show full text]
  • Cheboygan County Local Ordinance Gaps Analysis
    Cheboygan County Local Ordinance Gaps Analysis An essential guide for water protection Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Written and compiled by Grenetta Thomassey, Ph.D. Cheboygan County Local Ordinance Gaps Analysis An essential guide for water protection Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Written and compiled by Grenetta Thomassey, Ph.D. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. Mention of specific companies, organizations, or authorities in this book do not imply endorsement by the author or publisher, nor does the mention of specific companies, organizations or authorities imply that they endorse this book, its author or publisher. Internet addresses and phone numbers given in this book were accurate at the time of printing. Library of Congress Catalog Thomassey, Grenetta Cheboygan County Local Ordinance Gaps Analysis ISBN 978-1-889313-07-8 1. Government 2. Water Protection 3. Cheboygan County, Michigan © 2014 Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Photography by: Kristy Beyer If you want to reproduce this book or portions of it for reasons consistent with its purpose, please contact the publisher: Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council 426 Bay Street Petoskey, MI 49770 (231) 347-1181 phone (231) 347-5928 fax www.watershedcouncil.org This work should be cited as follows: Thomassey, Grenetta. Cheboygan County Local Ordinance Gaps Analysis 2014. Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council, Petoskey, MI 49770 ~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Cheboygan River/Lower Black River Watershed Initiative December 15, 2001-December 14, 2003
    Federal Section 319 Northeast Michigan Coucil of Goverments Nonpoint Source Grant Contact: Diane Rekowski 2000-0162 Phone: (989)-732-3551 Cheboygan River/Lower Black River Watershed Initiative December 15, 2001-December 14, 2003 Project Description: This project developed a watershed plan Project Sustainability: for the Cheboygan River/Lower Black River sub- o Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council and Science watersheds. This plan is the last of five phases and Environmental Education for the North. are to implement a water resource protection continuing efforts in educational programs program for the entire Cheboygan River o The Cheboygan District, USDA, and Natural Watershed. It is the remaining area within the Resources Conservation Service will continue to watershed that had not been inventoried for educate the agricultural community in ways to nonpoint source pollutants. protect water quality and aid in incorporating The Cheboygan River/Lower Black River BMP’s watershed is a 19,212 acre watershed located in o The City of Cheboygan, Cheboygan County, and Cheboygan County and consists of 75% Huron Pines RC&D Council is currently working to agricultural land. The rivers are part of the improve the storm water control program, Inland Waterway with 36 miles of navigable including effective zoning and model storm water water from Lake Huron to the inland lakes of ordinances. Mullett, Burt, Crooked, and Pickerel. o Northeast Michigan Coucil of Goverments is Tourism is becoming an increasing part of funding this project to sustain this project in the the local economy, with residential seasonal home lon term basis. Also they are going to continue to development occurring throughout the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Route 23 on the Great Lakes with a Hundred-Acre the Largest Falls in the Lower Peninsula
    1 Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center - 5 Alpena Bi-Path 10a Paul Bunyan 10b Shinga-ba-Shores Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary The Alpena Bi-Path is a bicycle and pedestrian ichigan Dive in and explore Great Lakes maritime heritage pathway throughout the City. Bike, walk, roller lpena,M at the Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary and blade and skateboard on the 18+ miles of paved Babe was white at the time he was built in A the Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center. Thunder pathway and access all the waterfront parks in 1937/38 on the hill across from the Lookout Bay was designated as a national marine sanctuary the city. The Bi-Path follows along the top of the Inn. The legend was that a white cow on a hill to protect a nationally significant collection of breakwall at the marina, allowing an unobstructed signified good luck. In 1950, new owners bought nearly 200 shipwrecks that lie in Lake Huron off the view of Lake Huron. A section follows the shore the hill and Babe was painted blue. Paul was built coast of Alpena County, Michigan. These vessels of the Thunder Bay River through the Alpena in 1953. In 2006, Paul and Babe were moved to rest in an area known as Shipwreck Alley and tell County Fairgrounds. The Bi-Path encompasses the Maritime Heritage Trail located their present location and were restored in 2007. stories of the development of the Great Lakes region and the western expansion of the along the Thunder Bay River next to the Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center and Shinga-ba-Shores is located across US 23 from Dinosaur Gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Inland Waterway and Straits Area Water Trails Plan
    Water Trail Plan Inland Waterway and Straits Area Cheboygan and Emmet Counties Funded by: Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce and the Michigan Coastal Management Program, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality with support from the Emmet County, Cheboygan County, Mackinaw City, and volunteers. June 2014 1 Inland Waterway and Straits Area Water Trail Plan Introduction The Inland Waterway is a 40 mile long historic water route that connects Lake Huron by way of Cheboygan, Indian River, Alanson, and Conway and with series of long portages at the headwaters to Petoskey State Park and Lake Michigan. A coastal route, part of the Huron Shores Blueways, connects the City of Cheboygan to Mackinaw City and the Straits of Mackinac. Like the interior water trails, the coastal waters have been used for transportation for thousands of years. The Inland Waterway has long been marketed as the motor boating paradise. Sitting along the banks of the Indian River on a summer afternoon and watching a steady stream of motored craft pass by, attests to the marketing success. There has never been a multi-community effort to organize and promote a paddle trail. Human-powered quiet water sports are among the fastest growing outdoor recreation activities. Combined with other active sports facilities such as the North Central State Trail, North Western State Trail and the North Country Trail, the water trail will bring visitors to the area, add to the quality of life for residents and enhance the rural-recreation sense of place. Furthermore, development of the water trail represents a regional, multi organization effort and will support economic development in the region of the state dependent upon recreational visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Ab307 Application Summary Proposed Project Applicant App
    AB307 APPLICATION SUMMARY PROPOSED PROJECT APPLICANT APP. RCVD. TYPE COUNTY SIZE Bordertown to California 120kV NV Energy 6/27/2012 Powerline Washoe 120 kV North Elko Pipeline Prospector Pipeline Comp. 7/11/2012 Nat Gas Pipeline Elko, Eureka Wild Rose ORNI 47 7/17/2012 Geothermal Mineral 30 MW New York Canyon New York Canyon LLC 8/14/2012 Geothermal Persh., Church. 70 MW Mountain View Solar Energy Mountain View Solar LLC 9/24/2012 Solar Clark 20 MW Mahacek to Mt. Hope 230kV Eureka Moly LLC 10/23/2012 Powerline Eureka 230 kV Moapa Solar Energy Center Moapa Solar LLC 11/5/2012 Powerline Clark 230 kV, 500 kV Pahrump Valley Solar Project Abengoa Solar Inc. 11/14/2012 Solar Clark, Nye 225 MW Copper Rays Solar Farm Element Power Solar Dev. LLC 11/26/2012 Solar Nye 180 MW Boulder City Solar Project Techren Solar 1/2/2013 Solar Clark 300 MW Townsite Solar Project KOWEPO America LLC/Skylar Res. LP 1/15/2013 Solar Clark 180 MW Copper Mountain Solar 3 CMS-3 LLC (Sempra Energy) 1/16/2013 Solar Clark 250 MW Crescent Peak Wind Crescent Peak Renewables LLC 1/23/2013 Wind Clark 500 MW Silver State Solar South Silver State Solar Power South LLC 1/23/2013 Solar Clark 350 MW Toquop Power Project Toquop Power Holdings LLC 1/23/2013 Fossil Fuel Lincoln 1,100 MW Hidden Hills 230kV Transmission Valley Electric Transmission Assoc. LLC 1/28/2013 Powerline Nye, Clark 230 kV Boulder Solar Project Boulder Solar Power LLC 1/25/2013 Solar Clark 350 MW ARES Regulation Energy Mgmt.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Update
    Country Update BILLBOARD.COM/NEWSLETTERS MARCH 9, 2020 | PAGE 1 OF 17 INSIDE BILLBOARD COUNTRY UPDATE [email protected] Morris, Brown Top Charts Brandy Clark Makes A Personal >page 4 Statement On The Record Nashville Works Toward Recovery Ten seconds into Brandy Clark’s Your Life Is a Record, a the listener to an expectant conclusion of what turns out to be >page 9 languid grunting tone emerges, unconventionally planting a breakup album, released by Warner on March 6. “The Past a baritone sax into the opening moments of what’s ostensibly Is the Past,” she declares in that glassy finale, with fragile a country album. guitar arpeggios supporting a It’s a tad mysterious. In transitional journey into some Dan + Shay Launch context, it could be a bassoon or unknown future. Putting that Arena Tour a bass clarinet — Clark thought upbeat sentiment at the end >page 10 it was a cello the first time she of the project rather than the heard it — but it reveals to the beginning was one of the few listener that Your Life Is a Record, places where she dug in her heels produced by Jay Joyce (Eric with the label. Current News: Church, Miranda Lambert), “I wanted it that way because Just LeDoux It is not quite like either of the to me, ‘The Past Is the Past’ is >page 10 previous records the award- bittersweet, but it’s hopeful,” winning singer-songwriter has she explains. “It’s like, ‘OK, we’ve launched in the marketplace. gone through all this and I’m still Makin’ Tracks: “I said to Jay when I heard sad about it, but I’m letting you Pardi’s Strait Talk that baritone sax thing, ‘Man, go.’ And I’m driving away — like, >page 14 I know this is crazy ’cause it’s a I literally feel like I’m in the car slow, sad song.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentrating Solar Power Tower: Latest Status 3 Report and Survey of Development Trends
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 November 2017 doi:10.20944/preprints201710.0027.v2 1 Review 2 Concentrating Solar Power Tower: Latest Status 3 Report and Survey of Development Trends 4 Albert Boretti 1,*, Stefania Castelletto 2 and Sarim Al-Zubaidy 3 5 1 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (MAE), Benjamin M. Statler College of 6 Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States, 7 [email protected]; [email protected] 8 2 School of Engineering, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia; [email protected] 9 3 The University of Trinidad and Tobago, Trinidad and Tobago; [email protected] 10 * Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] 11 Abstract: The paper examines design and operating data of current concentrated solar power (CSP) 12 solar tower (ST) plants. The study includes CSP with or without boost by combustion of natural gas 13 (NG), and with or without thermal energy storage (TES). The latest, actual specific costs per 14 installed capacity are very high, 6085 $/kW for Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) 15 with no TES, and 9227 $/kW for Crescent Dunes with TES. The actual production of electricity is 16 very low and much less than the expected. The actual capacity factors are 22% for ISEGS, despite 17 combustion of a significant amount of NG largely exceeding the planned values, and 13% for 18 Crescent Dunes. The design values were 33% and 52%. The study then reviews the proposed 19 technology updates to produce better ratio of solar field power to electric power, better capacity 20 factor, better matching of production and demand, lower plant’s cost, improved reliability and 21 increased life span of plant’s components.
    [Show full text]