DOCSLIB.ORG

Protecting Land for Wildlife

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vermont Land Trust YEAR IN REVIEW 2018–19 Vermont Land Trust Paul Bruhn YEAR IN REVIEW 2018–19 1947–2019 For 40 years, as executive director of the Preservation Trust of Vermont, Paul Bruhn used his good nature, compassion, creativity, and penchant for finding solutions to make Vermont better. Paul advocated for enhancing downtowns and village centers while protecting the surrounding rural landscape. He used relationships and mutual understanding to forge a stronger, more beautiful Vermont. Paul’s passion for our state is deeply reflected in VLT’s conservation work. We dedicate this report to Paul—an inspiration to all who knew him. Dear members and friends, ach fall we gather at our Annual Celebration to say thank you to our members, E landowners, trustees, and staff who are the backbone of the Vermont Land Trust. This year, our celebration took place in Ripton at the Bread Loaf campus, with foliage glowing in fall’s fiery colors on the mountains behind us. Thanks to all of you, the Vermont Land Trust has never been stronger. The results set out in this annual report speak for themselves. But it’s the people and communities behind those results that matter the most. Take Tom Kidder who helped to secure 115 individual donations for the Town of Newbury to buy and conserve Tucker Mountain. Or Norma Norris who sold her Monkton farm to VLT in 2016 so new farmers could take over; today Stephen and Sarah Park operate Full Belly Farm there. These Vermonters, and thousands others, are motivated by a vision of vibrant working landscapes and healthy communities where farming and forestry succeed. This year we celebrated our 100th Farmland Access project, helping new farmers purchase and operate farms on land that could otherwise have been sold for non-farm use or developed. In the coming years, we will double our efforts to support the viability of farming, to expand community access to recreation and natural areas, and to protect wildlife habitat and ecological resources. This drive to do more comes directly from our mission to serve all Vermonters— many of whom may never own large parcels or work the land. With this in mind, we are seeking new ways to bring our expertise and resources to our state’s most pressing challenges, particularly those facing the rural communities that knit us together. We are making great strides, but more remains to be done. We must view our impact through a broader lens. We must expand the group of Vermonters who see the land, and the communities it supports, as the source of Vermont’s strength. We are grateful for the support you have provided. Won’t you join us as we embrace the new challenges that lie ahead? Sincerely, Nick Richardson Marc Mihaly President & CEO Chair, Board of Trustees 3 Our Work This Year Contributed to the protection Over 8,600 new acres under of 16,000 acres VLT conservation easements Farms Recreation and Wildlife 33 farm properties conserved 2 town forests 5 conserved farms transitioned to new farmers 5 properties with local trails 10 farm families bought their first farmland 38 miles of ski trails 8 farm businesses purchased more land 7,500+ acres of forest that have access for hunting, walking, birdwatching, etc. 23 farms support dairy and dairy products 12 farms produce meat and eggs Clean Water 4 farms grow vegetables and/or fruits 5 properties used for maple 5 miles of pond and lake frontage syrup production 11 miles of river frontage 90 miles of streams 526 acres of wetlands Stewardship 500,000+ acres of previously Forestland conserved land monitored by stewardship staff 11,000+ acres protected 4 5 A Far m at the Heart n her 44 years of farming in Monkton, Norma Norris put her family farm at Ithe heart of the community. She and her husband started out dairy farming in 1973. In ’95, they switched to what had been Norma’s sideline: delicious of its Community strawberries. They added veggies, more berries, and rechristened Norris Dairy Farm as Norris Berry Farm. Norma was widowed in 2004, but she kept farming. By the time she started thinking about retirement, her farm was so beloved that Monkton dedicated the 2016 town report to her, highlighting her generosity: she supplied berries for events like the library’s annual Strawberry Festival and gave many kids their first job and their first taste of what Norma calls “the merits of hard work.” The 108-acre farm’s stunning views and easy commuter access to Middlebury and Burlington made it a prime spot for housing developments. Instead, Norma sold the farm to VLT in 2016 to ensure that her land would stay in farming. “It just seemed like the right thing to do,” says Norma, who now lives in a new house just down the road. “We had possibili- ties where we could have sold lots, but it’s just, I think, the prettiest spot on earth, and there’s always been something very special about what grew there because it’s so good.” Stephen and Sarah Park heard about Norris Berry Farm just after they returned from their honeymoon and soon pitched a business proposal to VLT’s Farmland Access Program. “They had lots of good experience growing berries and vegetables, and were the best fit for this property,” says VLT’s Allen Karnatz. The Parks began leasing the farm in 2017 and called their new enterprise Full Belly Farm. Last summer, they purchased the farm outright. Since then, they’ve built four new greenhouses, expanded the farmstand, planted a half-acre of raspberries, and increased strawberry production. “We love seeing our produce enjoyed by others and finding ways to improve what we do,” says Sarah. “We are now starting to see the results of our work play out over time. Progress can seem slow, but we are pouring our energy into this place and it is making a difference. Every day it feels a little more like it’s ours.” Helping retiring farmers like Norma Norris (above) and new farmers like Stephen and Sarah Park (left) is key to the future of farming. 6 7 Rallying Around a ucked away in the small town of Woodford sits Prospect Mountain Nordic TSki Center, a network of 30 kilometers of skillfully groomed trails with Beloved Mountain consistently good snow. The mountain is a hub of activity with skiers of all ages and abilities exploring the trails, and college and high school ski teams using the area to train and race. But, a few years ago when word spread that the ski center would be up for sale, the fate of Prospect was not clear. That’s when the tight-knit community surrounding the mountain declared that it was unwilling to let their cherished ski area go. “We realized this was our window of opportunity,” says David Newell, president of the Prospect Mountain Association (PMA). The nonprofit group was formed by devoted Prospect skiers determined to keep the mountain open. “We wanted to be sure the mountain was secured for the community.” In September of 2018, PMA successfully purchased Prospect Mountain and its 144 acres were conserved with help from VLT. Major funding for the purchase came from Williams College and the Vermont Housing & Conservation Board—but the rest came from community members who adore Prospect. When the fundraising campaign began, donations poured in. They came from people who’ve skied at Prospect for decades and those who never have. Local businesses chipped in and so did the Town of Bennington. “Once we got going, the fundraising just kind of took on a life of its own,” David says. “It was tremendous, the momentum we had.” Before they knew it, they had raised $55,000 more than the goal. With the future of the ski area now secure, members of PMA are putting the surplus funds to good use, making Prospect an even more enjoyable place to ski. Projects like improving trails, updating infrastructure, and exploring the possibility of snowmaking are underway. “Prospect Mountain is an incredible community asset,” says VLT’s Donald Campbell, who worked closely with PMA. “It’s not always easy for people to talk about the land that they love. It’s so wonderful that this community was able to articulate that love in time to do something about it.” VLT works with community groups to save recreation spots, like Prospect Mountain in Woodford, where people can connect to land. 8 9 Managing the Forest n a perfect summer day, 40 foresters gathered on woodland in Rupert. OThey were here to learn more about managing forests with ash trees, given the threat of Emerald Ash Borer (EAB). The larvae of this invasive beetle chew to Save a Species tunnels under the bark; this cuts off water and nutrition and usually kills the tree. EAB was first found in Vermont in 2018; it’s confirmed in 10 towns today. Forester Alan Calfee hosted the workshop on land he conserved with VLT. He helps manage around 25,000 acres on parcels ranging from 20 acres to 5,000. EAB hasn’t yet been found on those lands, but people are asking him about it. “The workshop was a bit of an awakening for me,” he reflects. Paul E. Richardson E. Paul “It really hit me that this pest is here. We have to start managing the forests for EAB now.” The workshop was part of a new VLT effort to help people improve the health of their land. VLT has held events, with partners, for landowners and professionals on three topics: EAB, invasive plants, and managing deer populations for forest health.
Recommended publications
  • List of Vermont Water Bodies Known with an Aquatic Invasive Species

    List of Vermont Water Bodies Known with an Aquatic Invasive Species

    Key: List of Vermont water bodies known AL - alewife SS - starry stonewort BN - brittle naiad SWF - spiny water flea with an aquatic invasive species CLP - curly-leaf pondweed VLM - variable-leaved watermilfoil EF - European frogbit WC - water chestnut Updated Apr. 2016 EWM - Eurasian watermilfoil ZM - zebra mussel These species are considered the most problematic in Vermont Water body Town AL BN CLP EF EWM SWF SS VLM WC ZM Arrowhead Mountain Lake Milton X Austin Pond Hubbardton X Beaver Wetland Mendon X Beaver Pond Proctor X Beebe Pond Hubbardton X X Berlin Pond Berlin X Big Marsh Slough Highgate X X X X Black Pond Hubbardton X X Black River Springfield X Blissville Wetland Pond Blissville X Broad Brook Vernon X Brookside Pond Orwell X X Brownington Pond Brownington X Bullis Pond Franklin X X Burr Pond Sudbury X X Cabot Clark Marsh Highgate X Castleton River Castleton X Cedar Lake Monkton X Chipman Pond Tinmouth X Clay Brook Warren X Clyde Pond Derby X Coggman Creek X Coggman Pond West Haven X X X Connecticut River, Herricks Cove Rockingham X Connecticut River, Hoyts Landing Springfield X X Connecticut River, TransCanada launch Concord X Connecticut River, Wilder Dam Hartford X Cranberry Pool Highgate X X X Crystal Lake Barton X Daniels Pond Glover X Dead Creek Ferrisburgh X Dead Creek Highgate X X Deweys Mill Pond Hartford X Echo Lake Hubbardton X Fairfield Pond Fairfield X X Fairfield Swamp Pond Swanton X Fern Lake Leicester X X Forest Lake Calais X Frog Pond Orwell X Gale Meadows Pond Londonderry X Glen Lake Castleton X X 1 Water
  • Dams and Reservoirs in the Lake Champlain Richelieu River Basin

    Dams and Reservoirs in the Lake Champlain Richelieu River Basin

    JUST THE FACTS SERIES June 2019 DAMS AND RESERVOIRS IN THE LAKE CHAMPLAIN RICHELIEU RIVER BASIN MYTH Water released from tributary dams in the United States causes flooding in Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River. FACT Water levels in Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River Generally, mass releases of water from flood control are primarily affected by precipitation from rain or dams are avoided. In addition to compromising the snowmelt. structural integrity of the dams, mass releases would also endanger the very communities that these dams are built Because of its size, Lake Champlain can store a lot of to protect. water; the flood control dams and reservoirs in the basin, which are very small in comparison to the lake, do not When conditions force the release of more water than significantly change water levels of the lake and river as hydropower plants can handle, the increase in water they release water. levels immediately below the dam will be much greater than the increase on Lake Champlain. This is true even during high water and flooding events. Consider, for instance, when Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River experienced extreme flooding between April and June 2011, the additional releases flowing from Waterbury Reservoir—the largest flood control reservoir in the Vermont portion of the basin, contributed less than 2 centimetres (¾ inch) to the elevation of Lake Champlain and the upper Richelieu River. International Lake Champlain-Richelieu River Study Board FACT FACT Dams in the US portion of the basin are built for one of Waterbury Reservoir in Vermont is the largest reservoir two purposes: flood control or hydroelectric power.
  • Nutrient Loading and Impacts in Lake Champlain – Missisquoi Bay and Lake Memphremagog

    Nutrient Loading and Impacts in Lake Champlain – Missisquoi Bay and Lake Memphremagog

    Nutrient Loading and Impacts in Lake Champlain – Missisquoi Bay and Lake Memphremagog Missisquoi Bay. IJC Collection Lake Memphremagog. IJC Collection Missisquoi Bay Cyanobacteria. Pierre Leduc Prepared by the International Joint Commission April 21, 2020 Table of Contents I. Synthesis Document ........................................................................................................................ 3 A. Context ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Cyanobacteria .................................................................................................................................. 3 Actions and Consequences of Non-action ........................................................................................ 3 The Governments’ Reference ........................................................................................................... 4 IJC’s Approach to the Reference ...................................................................................................... 5 Workshops to Review Science and Policy on Nutrient Loading ........................................................ 6 Public Meeting and Online Consultation .......................................................................................... 6 B. IJC Analysis of SAG Reports ....................................................................................................... 7 C. Common Basin Recommendations and IJC Recommendations
  • Progress Report on River Basin Water Quality Management Planning During 2010

    Progress Report on River Basin Water Quality Management Planning During 2010

    PROGRESS REPORT ON RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING DURING 2010 A REPORT FOR: HOUSE & SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE HOUSE & SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY JANUARY 2011 PREPARED BY: VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VT 05671 www.vtwaterquality.org Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................3 Section 1) Statewide Surface Water Management Strategy - a Framework for Statewide Efforts to Guide Surface Water Management.................................................................................................................................5 Protecting & Improving Surface Waters by Managing Stressors ....................................................................5 What are the 10 Major Stressors affecting Vermont’s surface waters? ...........................................................6 Using the Stressor Approach to Evaluate Program Effectiveness ...................................................................6 Tactical Basin Planning: Managing waters along a gradient of condition.......................................................6 WQD Ambient Surface Water Monitoring & Assessment Strategy................................................................6 Public Input......................................................................................................................................................6
  • Surface Waters of Vermont

    Surface Waters of Vermont

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 424 SURFACE WATERS OF VERMONT BY C. H. PIERCE Prepared in cooperation with the STATE OF VERMONT WASHINGTON GOVEENMENT PBINTING OFFICE 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BK PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 25 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation................................................................ 8 Division of work.......................................................... 8 Definition of terms......................................................... 9 Explanation of data........................................................ 9 Accuracy of field data and computed results................................ 11 Gaging stations maintained in Vermont..................................... 12 St. Lawrence River basin................................................. 13 Lake Champlain drainage basin......................................... 13 General features................................................... 13 Gaging-station records.............................................. 14 Lake Champlain at Burlington, Vt.............................. 14 Lake Champlain outlet (Richelieu River) at Chambly, Province of Quebec.1................................................. 20 Poultney Eiver near Fair Haven, Vt............................ 25 Otter Creek at Middlebury,
  • 122 Fish Management Rule Annotated

    122 Fish Management Rule Annotated

    APPENDIX 122 TITLE 10 Conservation and Development APPENDIX CHAPTER 2. FISH Subchapter 2. Seasons, Waters, and Limits § 122. Fish Management Regulation. 1.0 Authority (a) This rule is adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §4081(b). In adopting this rule, the Fish and Wildlife Board is following the policy established by the General Assembly that the protection, propagation, control, management, and conservation of fish, wildlife and fur-bearing animals in this state is in the interest of the public welfare and that the safeguarding of this valuable resource for the people of the state requires a constant and continual vigilance. (b) In accordance with 10 V.S.A. §4082, this rule is designed to maintain the best health, population and utilization levels of Vermont’s fisheries. (c) In accordance with 10 V.S.A. §4083, this rule establishes open seasons; establishes daily, season, possession limits and size limits; prescribes the manner and means of taking fish; and prescribes the manner of transportation and exportation of fish. 2.0 Purpose It is the policy of the state that the protection, propagation control, management and conservation of fish, wildlife, and fur-bearing animals in this state is in the interest of the public welfare, and that safeguarding of this valuable resource for the people of the state requires a constant and continual vigilance. 3.0 Open-Water Fishing, legal methods of taking fish 3.1 Definitions (a) Department – Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. (b) Commissioner –Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Commissioner. (c) Open-water fishing –Fishing by means of hook and line in hand or attached to a rod or other device in open water.
  • 2020 Press Release

    2020 Press Release

    For Release: IMMEDIATE ( 11 September 2020 ) Press Contact: Bradley Young, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (not for publication) (802) 881-8426, [email protected] LAKE CHAMPLAIN FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE WILL TREAT FOUR RIVERS TO CONTROL SEA LAMPREY POPULATIONS The Lake Champlain Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative (Cooperative) will be controlling larval sea lamprey populations using lampricides on four Lake Champlain tributaries during the months of September and October. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department will be treating portions of four Vermont tributaries as part of the Cooperative’s long-term sea lamprey control program for Lake Champlain: Winooski River, Missisquoi River, LaPlatte River, and Lamoille River. Federal and State permits for the application of Missisquoi River lampricide are required and obtained prior to treatments. Treatments are scheduled to begin with Winooski River on September 23rd. Treatment dates are always contingent on weather and may change with short notice. While trout and salmon are the primary beneficiaries of these efforts, lake Lamoille River sturgeon, walleye, and many other species also benefit from sea lamprey control. Sea lamprey control also generates economic activity by increasing angling opportunities and the time that boaters, anglers, and Winooski River their families spend in the Lake Champlain area. Burlington Annual assessments continue to show improvements to the lake’s fish LaPlatte River populations, with lower wounding rates and increased numbers of older larger salmon and lake trout. However, wounding rates remain above target levels. Ongoing program initiatives to enhance the effectiveness of control efforts are underway that will further reduce the sea lamprey population and reduce their impacts on Lake Champlain’s fish populations.
  • Appendices for the West, Williams and Saxtons Rivers and Adjacent Connecticut River Tributaries

    Appendices for the West, Williams and Saxtons Rivers and Adjacent Connecticut River Tributaries

    Appendices for the West, Williams and Saxtons Rivers and adjacent Connecticut River Tributaries Contents Appendices for the West, Williams and Saxtons Rivers and adjacent Connecticut River Tributaries ....................................... 1 Appendix A – Existing Uses ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Appendix B. 1 – Dams in the Basin ............................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Appendix B. 2 – Coordination Plan ......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Appendix B – 3. How a Dam Affects a River ............................................................................................................................................................ 19 Appendix B – 4. Whitewater Paddling Releases on the West River ........................................................................................................................ 20 Appendix B – 5. VDFW Whitewater Release Memo ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Appendix C – Fisheries Assessment Summary ........................................................................................................................................................
  • Northern Vermont

    Northern Vermont

    Welcome to Northern Vermont 11 Introduction 11 Geography and Geology 14 Natural History 19 Northern Vermont History 27 General Topics 29 Parking and Access 29 Customs 29 Water Regime and Prediction 31 Water Quality 32 Fishing Pressure 34 Stocking 35 Regulations 36 Basic Equipment 38 Flies 38 The Fish 43 Landlocked Salmon 43 Brook Trout 48 Rainbow Trout 51 Steelhead 52 Brown Trout 55 Smallmouth Bass 57 Incidental Catches 59 Common Carp 59 Fallfish 61 Lake Trout 61 Walleye 62 Largemouth Bass 63 The Fishing Seasons 65 Spring Fishing 65 Summer Fishing 67 Fall Fishing 70 Winter Fishing 72 It Is Flooding! 75 Headwaters 77 Lake Outlets 77 Gihon River at Eden Mills 78 Outlet of Echo Lake at East Charleston 78 Green River at Garfield 78 Marginal Lake Outlets 79 Clyde River Lower Stem 79 Upper Stem of the Missisquoi River 80 Other Small Rivers to Do... Later 81 Two Big Rivers to Avoid... Until Much Later 81 Stream Gages 83 When Things Get Really Rough 83 Another Nice Day in Northern Vermont... Too Bad 85 Go for Gorges 85 Finding Shade 86 Lamoille Watershed 87 Memphremagog Watershed 87 Missisquoi Watershed 88 Lamoille River Watershed 91 Lamoille River Headwaters 95 Horse Pond, Long Pond and Flagg Ponds 96 Lamoille River at The Four Corners 97 Lamoille River at Greensboro Bend 98 Stannard Brook 100 Greensboro Brook 101 Lamoille River at East Hardwick 103 Haynesville Brook 107 Porter Brook 110 Nichols Brook 111 Cooper Brook 115 Lamoille River at Hardwick 116 Lamoille River Downstream of Hardwick 116 Main Stem of the Lamoille River 120 Lamoille River
  • WATERS THAT DRAIN VERMONT the Connecticut River Drains South

    WATERS THAT DRAIN VERMONT the Connecticut River Drains South

    WATERS THAT DRAIN VERMONT The Connecticut River drains south. Flowing into it are: Deerfield River, Greenfield, Massachusetts o Green River, Greenfield, Massachusetts o Glastenbury River, Somerset Fall River, Greenfield, Massachusetts Whetstone Brook, Brattleboro, Vermont West River, Brattleboro o Rock River, Newfane o Wardsboro Brook, Jamaica o Winhall River, Londonderry o Utley Brook, Londonderry Saxtons River, Westminster Williams River, Rockingham o Middle Branch Williams River, Chester Black River, Springfield Mill Brook, Windsor Ottauquechee River, Hartland o Barnard Brook, Woodstock o Broad Brook, Bridgewater o North Branch Ottauquechee River, Bridgewater White River, White River Junction o First Branch White River, South Royalton o Second Branch White River, North Royalton o Third Branch White River, Bethel o Tweed River, Stockbridge o West Branch White River, Rochester Ompompanoosuc River, Norwich o West Branch Ompompanoosuc River, Thetford Waits River, Bradford o South Branch Waits River, Bradford Wells River, Wells River Stevens River, Barnet Passumpsic River, Barnet o Joes Brook, Barnet o Sleepers River, St. Johnsbury o Moose River, St. Johnsbury o Miller Run, Lyndonville o Sutton River, West Burke Paul Stream, Brunswick Nulhegan River, Bloomfield Leach Creek, Canaan Halls Stream, Beecher Falls 1 Lake Champlain Lake Champlain drains into the Richelieu River in Québec, thence into the Saint Lawrence River, and into the Gulf of Saint Lawrence. Pike River, Venise-en-Quebec, Québec Rock River, Highgate Missisquoi
  • The Impact of Railways on Stanstead: 1850 to 1950 J

    The Impact of Railways on Stanstead: 1850 to 1950 J

    Document generated on 10/02/2021 2:08 p.m. Histoire Québec The impact of railways on Stanstead: 1850 to 1950 J. Derek Booth Volume 14, Number 3, 2009 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/11391ac See table of contents Publisher(s) Les Éditions Histoire Québec ISSN 1201-4710 (print) 1923-2101 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Booth, J. D. (2009). The impact of railways on Stanstead: 1850 to 1950. Histoire Québec, 14(3), 10–18. Tous droits réservés © Les Éditions Histoire Québec, 2009 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ VOL nin n \ ni i mi The impact of railways on Stanstead: 1850 to 1950 by J. Derek Booth D' J. Derek Booth was educated at McGill and is Professor Emeritus of Geography at Bishop's University. He is the author of several books on the role of railways in Quebec. This article is based on a lecture by Derek Booth on the occasion of the opening of the Stanstead Historical Society's Summer 2005 exhibition, "Arrival and Departure: The Regional Train." Le Dr J. Derek Booth a fait ses études à l'Université M'Gill; il est actuellement professeur émérite de géographie à l'Université Bishop's.
  • FLOODING in the MASSAWIPPI BASIN DURING the 20TH CENTURY Norman Jones Bishop's University

    FLOODING in the MASSAWIPPI BASIN DURING the 20TH CENTURY Norman Jones Bishop's University

    107 FLOODING IN THE MASSAWIPPI BASIN DURING THE 20TH CENTURY Norman Jones Bishop's University RESUME L'histoire des inondations dans les Cantons de l'Est quebecois n'a jamais ete etudiee en detail. Cet article relate I'histoire des inondations dans Ie bassin hydrographique de la riviere Massawippi au 2CF siecle d'un point de vue joumalistique, archivistique et physiographique. Les donnees proviennent de plusieurs joumaux locallX, en particulier du Sherbrooke Record, des photos d'archives reunies par fe Centre de recherche des Cantons de l'Est, des mesures faites de fa physiographie du bassin et des donnees climatiques foumies par Environnement Canada. L'analyse de ces divers types de donnees revele qu'il y a eu des inondations dans Ie bassin de la Massawippi a 6S des 100 demieres annees. Ces inondations ont cause des dommages allX infrastructures gouvemementales, des inconvenients et des pertes d'ordre personnel ainsi que des pertes commerdales, particulierement dans Ie secteur agricofe. Certaines preuves indiquent une augmentation possible de fa frequence des inondations vers fa fin du siecle. La partie inferieure du bassin, Lennoxville et Ie sud de fa ville, est Ie secteur qui a ete Ie plus souvent touche. ABSTRACT The history of flooding in the Eastern Townships of Quebec has never been studied in detail. This article describes the history of flooding in the Massawippi Drainage Basin throughout the 20th century, from a newspaper media, archival and physical geographic perspective. The data are derived from a number of local newspapers, particularly the Sherbrooke Record, from archival photographs collected by the Eastern Townships Research Centre, from measurements of the basin's physiography, and from climate data provided by Environment Canada.