The Role of Patient Representative in The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

THE ROLE OF PATIENT REPRESENTATIVE IN THE MENTAL HEALTH CARE AND TREATMENT ACT by © Colleen Simms A Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment for the requirements of the degree of Master of Science Division of Community Health and Humanities Faculty of Medicine Memorial University of Newfoundland October, 2016 St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador ABSTRACT The Mental Health Care and Treatment Act of Newfoundland and Labrador introduced new provisions for patient rights, including access to a Patient Representative of the patient's choosing. This thesis explores the experience of one Patient Representative and the author provides an autoethnographic narrative using her experiences as a mental health nurse, manager and policy maker during the same timeframe. Themes of lack of empathy and respect for both the Patient Representative and the client as well as the need for advocacy and management accountability were identified by the Patient Representative and supported by the author through her autoethnographic narrative. Recommendations include providing a Patient Representative role that is a paid independent advocate and creating a separate provision for families/caregivers to be involved in the treatment plan. This would support caregivers in their already full roles and allow a better balancing of the patient’s right to autonomy with the duty of care. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first wish to acknowledge my supervisory committee, Dr. Victor Maddalena, Dr. Natalie Beausoleil and Dr. Daryl Pullman for their patience, expert and scholarly advice, support and guidance. A special thank you to Dr. Beausoleil for her encouragement to "get on with it" and for allowing me to audit her course which inspired my methodology and methods, to Dr. Pullman for his insightful comments that pulled everything together and to Dr. Maddalena whose calm and reassuring manner and thoughtful suggestions at just the right times ensured I crossed the finished line. I also wish to thank the lone participant for this study, who spent many hours in discussion with me as we journeyed together through his experiences as a Patient Representative and a caregiver. This thesis simply would not have happened without him. Finally, to my husband Larry, my children Allison (Brian), Jeff and Hillary and my parents Tom and Theresa Lundrigan, my love and thanks for your constant and unconditional support, not just during my thesis but always. This thesis is dedicated to the memory of Norman Reid, one of my first patients, who died as a result of untreated mental illness. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………….……..iii TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………….……..iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………...……………vii LIST OF APPENDICES…………………………………………………………...…...viii Chapter 1 Introduction……………………….……………………………….…………..1 1.1 Purpose and Overview………………………………….…………….1 1.2 Study Objectives………………………………………….…………..2 1.3 Thesis Organization……………………………………….………….3 1.4 Background……………………………………………….…………..3 1.5 Rationale……………………………………………………….….….9 Chapter 2 Literature Review……………………………………………………..……...11 2.1 Introduction………………………………………………………….11 2.2 Mental Health Legislation………………………………….………..13 2.3 Factors Associated with Involuntary Commitment…..……...………19 2.4 Historical View of Persons with Mental Illness.………….………....20 2.5 Coercion….……………………………………………...…………...24 2.6 Advocacy………………………………………………..……….…..33 2.7 Patient Rights………………………………………………………...36 2.8 Families and Caregivers……………………………………………...42 2.9 Recovery……………………….………………………………….…47 iv 2.10 Conclusion…………………………………………………………51 Chapter 3 Methodology………….…………………………………………..………….53 3.1 Introduction……………………………………………..…………..53 3.2 Social Constructivist Paradigm…………………………..…..……..53 3.3 Autoethnography……………………………………….….….…….57 3.4 Method...............................................................................................65 3.5 Semi Structured Interviews................................................................66 3.6 Memory Writing/Showing and Telling..............................................67 3.7 Analysis…………………………………………………….……….69 3.8 Case Study………………………………………………….……….69 3.9 Meetings with the Participant……………………………………….71 3.10 Ethical Considerations……………………….…………..………...72 Chapter 4 Findings…………………………………………………………..…………..75 4.1 Introduction……………………………………………..…….……..75 4.2 John and Jamie………………………………….………..………….75 4.3 Lack of Empathy………………………………………..…………...78 4.4 Respect and Dignity……………………………………..…….…….82 4.5 Need for Advocacy……………………………………..…..…..……90 4.6 Management Accountability………………..…………..………..…102 Chapter 5 Discussion Recommendations and Conclusion…………………….………..107 5.1 Introduction……………………………………………….………...107 v 5.2.1 Need for Advocacy……………………………………………….107 5.2.2 Respect and Dignity; Lack of Empathy…………………...……...112 5.2.3 Management Accountability………………………………..…….113 5.3 Recommendations for Legislation……………….………..………..116 5.4 Recommendations for Policy………………….………..…..…..…..118 5.5 Limitations to the Study…………………………………….………120 5.6 Areas for Future Research………………………………...…...…...120 5.7 Conclusion………………………………………………....……….121 Bibliography………………………………………………………………...….………123 Appendices…………………………………………………………………..…...……..146 vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS MHCTA Mental Health Care and Treatment Act CRDP Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities U.S. United States SSNL Schizophrenia Society of Newfoundland and Labrador CHANNAL Consumer Health Awareness Network of Newfoundland and Labrador ECT Electroconvulsive Treatment CEO Chief Executive Officer vii LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A-Consent……………………………………….…….……….147 Appendix B- Letter with New Information……………….…….………...151 Appendix C-Semi Structured Interview Questions……………….………153 Appendix D- Ethics Approval…………………………………….………154 Appendix E- Ethics Amendment Approval…………………….…………156 viii ix Chapter 1-Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Overview About 500 times each year in Newfoundland and Labrador, a mentally ill person is detained against her/his will and brought to a psychiatric facility. On about 175 of those occasions s/he is hospitalized involuntarily under the Mental Health Care and Treatment Act (2006) and given psychiatric treatment without consent. Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization is coercive and usually includes detention in a locked facility. During hospitalization patients may be subjected to treatments such as potent psychotropic medication and/or electroconvulsive therapy or they may be placed in seclusion or restraints. The Patient Representative is an individual who represents a person who is involuntarily hospitalized. Involuntary patients choose whether they have a Representative and who will represent them. Family members and/or caregivers are often asked to fulfill this role. The purpose of this thesis is to review the role of the Patient Representative within the Newfoundland and Labrador Mental Health Care and Treatment Act (MHCTA). This will be done by examining one person's experience in the role of Patient Representative utilizing a case study approach within an autoethnographic narrative. 1 1.2 Study Objectives The case study will concern a caregiver for a mentally ill person who has been in the role of Patient Representative for that person on two occasions and has been in the role of caregiver for about 25 years. During those 25 years I had employment roles as a mental health nurse, manager/administrator and policy advisor/maker in the mental health system. Therefore, I have chosen to examine this case study within an autoethnographic narrative. My research questions are: 1. What is the experience of the Patient Representative role as outlined in the MHCTA? 2. What can we learn from this experience? The specific objectives of my thesis are: 1. To examine the experience of one Patient Representative before and after the MHCTA (2006) came in force, using case study methodology. 2. To support the case study data with an autoethnographic narrative of my work experience before and after the MHCTA (2006) came into force. 3. To identify what has been learned from the data about the Patient Representative role. 2 1.3 Thesis Organization This thesis is organized into 5 chapters. Chapter 2 will provide a review of literature on: mental health legislation and coercion; advocacy and involuntary hospitalization; procedural justice and human rights issues; and family and caregiver issues. Chapter 3 will provide an explanation of my methodology and methods for collecting and analysing the data. Chapter 4 covers my findings from the case study and autoethnographic narrative, including four themes identified from my interviews with the Participant. Chapter 5 discusses the data generated including: themes generated and issues associated with the Patient Representative role, the involvement of caregivers in the treatment plan, and human rights issues such as the right to autonomy vs. the duty to care. It also provides recommendations for policy related to the Patient Representative role; potential for future directions in legislation; limitations of the study and areas for future research. 1.4 Background Mental health legislation acknowledges the need to provide psychiatric treatment to the relatively small number of acutely mentally ill individuals who do not seek care because of the symptoms of their illness. Such legislation exists throughout the world and in every province and territory in Canada. The World Health Organization reports the aim of mental health
Recommended publications
  • Changing Mental Health Legislation in the UK† Tony Zigmond

    Changing Mental Health Legislation in the UK† Tony Zigmond

    Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2008), vol. 14, 81–83 doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.107.005116 Editorial Changing mental health legislation in the UK† Tony Zigmond Abstract Following devolution, the mental health acts of the constituent countries of the UK are diverging in their provisions. This editorial describes three significant differences between the new Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003, which came into effect in Scotland in 2005, and the Mental Health Act 2007 for England and Wales. Devolution, in relation to mental health law, has It has been argued that we should not have come of age. The Mental Health (Care and Treat- any separate mental health legislation and that ment) (Scotland) Act 2003 is very different both the mental capacity legislation, with perhaps from its forerunner in Scotland and from the Men- some additional safeguards, should be the basis tal Health Act 1983 for England and Wales, even as for all non-consensual treatment (Zigmond, 1998; amended by the Mental Health Act 2007. Should Szmukler & Holloway, 1998). The proposals for the report of the Bamford Review of the legislative Northern Ireland are in line with this approach. The framework in Northern Ireland (Bamford Review of College in England and Wales took the view, as had Mental Health and Learning Disability (NI), 2007) already been accepted in Scotland, that the criteria be accepted and turned into a mental health act then for determining capacity as set out in the Mental we will have a third, very distinct, piece of mental Capacity Act 2005 are too narrow for use with people health law with in the UK.
  • THE RIGHTS and WRONGS of the PSYCHOPATH in CRIMINAL LAW: HOW MODERN SCIENCE MUST RESHAPE OLD POLICY. © Jasmine Nicolson* INTROD

    THE RIGHTS and WRONGS of the PSYCHOPATH in CRIMINAL LAW: HOW MODERN SCIENCE MUST RESHAPE OLD POLICY. © Jasmine Nicolson* INTROD

    THE RIGHTS AND WRONGS OF THE PSYCHOPATH IN CRIMINAL LAW: HOW MODERN SCIENCE MUST RESHAPE OLD POLICY. © Jasmine Nicolson* INTRODUCTION Psychopaths have long been enshrined in both popular culture and in law as the face of evil and danger;1 their classic characteristics of callousness, impulsivity, and remorselessness have helped to cement the conceptual link between psychopathy and violent crime.2 Psychiatrists from the 19th century, with all the equipment they had available at the time, made sweeping generalisations about the nature of the disorder. Pinel described patients who appeared without delusions or psychosis, as mentally unimpaired but engaged in impulsive acts of ‘instincte fureur’.3 Prichard built upon this definition to develop the concept of ‘moral insanity’. This term has evolved since its original intent – coming from the original French, ‘moral’ was taken to mean ‘emotional’ rather than ethical – and so the original ‘moral insanity’ was a ‘madness’ of emotional disposition and social ability, but without hallucinations or delusions.4 The concept has since evolved to include a lack of comprehension and appreciation of ethics and morality,5 but ultimately the M’Naghten rules in 1842 forged the legal defence of insanity, which required a clear presence of delusion, rather than a mere lack of morality.6 Both jurisdictions of England and Scotland have since built upon this to include an inability to 1 Cary Federman, Dave Holmes, and Jean Daniel Jacob, "Deconstructing the Psychopath: A Critical Discursive Analysis," Cultural Critique 72, no. 1 (2009). 2 Eric Silver, Edward P. Mulvey, and John Monahan, "Assessing Violence Risk among Discharged Psychiatric Patients: Toward an Ecological Approach," Law and Human Behavior 23, no.
  • Decision-Making Behaviour Under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: an English Perspective

    Decision-Making Behaviour Under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: an English Perspective

    laws Article Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English Perspective Nicola Glover-Thomas ID School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; [email protected] Received: 21 February 2018; Accepted: 20 March 2018; Published: 24 March 2018 Abstract: In England and Wales, the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) provides the legal framework which governs decisions made concerning the care and treatment of those suffering from mental disorders, where they may pose a risk to themselves or others. The perspective of the patient and the care provider may conflict and can be a source of tension and challenge within mental health law. Through access to a mental health tribunal, patients are offered the apparatus to review and challenge their detention. With detention rates under the mental health legislation rising exponentially, this is having a knock-on effect upon tribunal application numbers. As there is a legal requirement to review all cases of individuals detained under the MHA 1983, understanding the key drivers for this increase in detention is essential in order to understand how to better manage both detention rates and the upsurge in tribunal caseloads. With the increase in overall activity, mental health tribunal workloads present significant practical challenges and has downstream cost implications. Keywords: detention; caseload; mental health tribunal; Mental Health Act 1983; decision-making; risk; costs 1. Introduction Mental illness costs the UK economy £100 billion a year (Johnson 2016; McCrone et al. 2008). In 2012, the Her Majesty’s (HM) Government spent £126 billion on health (HM Treasury 2011, p.
  • Does Mental Health and Guardianship Legislation in Western Australia (WA

    Does Mental Health and Guardianship Legislation in Western Australia (WA

    Does mental health and guardianship legislation in Western Australia (WA) protect elderly persons from human rights abuse, and ensure procedural and substantive justice? Neville Francis Hills The University of Western Australia This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Western Australia The work presented in this thesis was performed in the Law School 2016 Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy – Mental Health Law Declaration This is to certify that this thesis does not incorporate, without acknowledgement, any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma from any university and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. Signed Name Neville Francis Hills Date December 1, 2016 i Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy – Mental Health Law Abstract This thesis addresses matters affecting the liberty, rights and welfare of older people in Western Australia (WA). Restriction of personal liberty to choose where to live, and who to associate with, is usually only permitted under criminal law, following legal processes. Mental health legislation also permits restraints on freedom of individuals, subject to legal oversight of the process. Admission into an aged care facility may restrict a person’s liberty, if placed in a locked area which they cannot leave without staff assistance. Laws regulating these procedures should be fair, open to scrutiny, and meeting international standards of law and good practice. In 2015 there were 16,350 Commonwealth funded aged care beds in 263 facilities in WA.
  • The Mental Health Act Code of Practice for Wales 2016

    The Mental Health Act Code of Practice for Wales 2016

    Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice for Wales Review Revised 2016 Mae’r ddogfen yma hefyd ar gael yn Gymraeg. This document is also available in Welsh. © Crown copyright 2016 WG29375 Digital ISBN 978-1-4734-7176-4 Print ISBN 978-1-4734-7177-1 Contents Foreword by the Cabinet Secretary for Health, Well-being and Sport 1 Introduction 3 1 Guiding Principles 8 2 Definition of mental disorder 13 3 Human rights and reducing inequalities 15 4 Information for patients, nearest relatives, families, carers and others 17 5 Nearest relative 25 6 Independent mental health advocacy 30 7 Attorneys and deputies 40 8 Privacy, dignity and safety 42 9 Views expressed in advance 50 10 Confidentiality and information sharing 53 11 Visiting patients in hospital 57 12 The Mental Health Review Tribunal for Wales 61 13 Relationship between the Mental Health Act, the Mental Capacity Act and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards 67 14 Applications for detention in hospital 75 15 Emergency applications for detention 93 16 Police powers and places of safety 95 17 Transport of patients 105 18 Holding powers 111 19 Children and young people under the age of 18 116 20 People with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder 128 21 People with personality disorders 135 22 Patients concerned with criminal proceedings 138 23 Appropriate medical treatment 153 24 Medical treatment 156 25 Treatments subject to special rules and procedures 168 26 Safe and therapeutic responses to challenging behaviour 183 27 Leave of absence 193 28 Absence without leave 199 29 Community
  • Coercion and Consent O N M I O Topics Covered Include: Monitoring the Mental Health Act 2007–2009 M I S S

    Coercion and Consent O N M I O Topics Covered Include: Monitoring the Mental Health Act 2007–2009 M I S S

    HEALT AL H T A N C E T . M In its thirteenth and final biennial report, the Mental Health Act Commission provides data and . C observations from its monitoring of the use of the Mental Health Act between 2007 and 2009. Coercion and consent O N M I O Topics covered include: monitoring the Mental Health Act 2007–2009 M I S S UÊÌ>Êw`}ÃÊÊÌ iÊÕÃiÊvÊiÜÊ«ÜiÀÃÊvÊ-Õ«iÀÛÃi`Ê ÕÌÞÊ/Ài>ÌiÌÊÊ UÊÌ iÊvÀVLiÊÌÀi>ÌiÌÊvÊ«>ÌiÌÃÊ`iÌ>i`ÊÕ`iÀÊÌ iÊiÌ>Êi>Ì ÊVÌÊ£nÎÊÊÊ consent and Coercion The Mental Health Act Commission UÊÌ iÊiÌ>Êi>Ì ÊVÌÊ>`ÊiÌ>ÞÊ`ÃÀ`iÀi`Êvvi`iÀÃÊ Thirteenth Biennial Report 2007–2009 UÊ`>Ì>ÊÊ`i>Ì ÃÊvÊ`iÌ>i`Ê«>ÌiÌÃÊLiÌÜiiÊÓääxÊ>`ÊÓään The report also highlights several areas for future research and monitoring, and draws these to the >ÌÌiÌÊvÊÌÃÊÃÕVViÃÃÀÊL`Þ]ÊÌ iÊ >ÀiÊ+Õ>ÌÞÊ ÃÃ°Ê monitoring the Mental Health Act 2007–2009 Act Health Mental the monitoring ÛiÀÊ«VÌÕÀiÊLÞÊ Àii]Ê>Ê«>ÌiÌÊÊÌ iÊ"/Ê`i«>ÀÌiÌÊvÊ-iÛiÀ>ÃÊëÌ>]Ê V iÃÌiÀ]Ê Ê£ÇÓ°Ê ÀiiÊ >`Ê >`ÊÌÜÊiÕVÌiÃÊÊÌ iÊ£xäÃ]Ê>ÌÊ>ÊÌiÊÜ iÊ iÀÊVÃÕÌ>ÌÊ «ÃÞV >ÌÀÃÌÊVÃ`iÀi`ÊLÀ>ÊÃÕÀ}iÀÞÊÌ iÊÌÀi>ÌiÌÊvÊV ViÊvÀÊÃV â« Ài>°Ê ISBN 978-0-11-322836-2 www.tso.co.uk 9 780113 228362 5991 MHAC Cover V0 3 indd 1 424987 Mental Health21/5/09 15:52:43 13th_C The Mental Health Act Commission Coercion and consent monitoring the Mental Health Act 2007–2009 MHAC Thirteenth Biennial Report 2007–2009 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraph 13 of Schedule 4 to the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Commencement No.9, Consequential Amendments and Transitory, Transitional and Saving Provisions) Order 2009.
  • Restricting Movement Or Depriving Liberty? Restricting Movement Or Depriving Liberty? Neil Allen1

    Restricting Movement Or Depriving Liberty? Restricting Movement Or Depriving Liberty? Neil Allen1

    Restricting Movement or Depriving Liberty? Restricting Movement or Depriving Liberty? Neil Allen1 “It is of course helpful to know that the question is one of degree and the matters which should be taken into account in answering it. But one also needs to be told what the question is. What is the criterion for deciding whether someone has been deprived of liberty or not?”2 This judicial appeal for clarity exposes a jurisprudential problem which threatens one of our most fundamental human values; the right to liberty. For no-one really knows what it means to be “deprived” of one’s “liberty”. The extremities are straightforward. Prisoners are deprived; picnickers are not. But liberty deprivations may “take numerous other forms [whose] variety is being increased by developments in legal standards and in attitudes”.3 Technology, too, has played its part in such developments by introducing novel ways of restricting movement beyond the paradigmatic lock and key. The more expansive those other forms, however, the greater the risk of legal uncertainty. The challenge in this paper is one of interpretation. Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 protects the “liberty and security of person” which is said to have a “Council of Europe-wide meaning”.4 But how should this autonomous concept be transposed into English law? Adopting Berlin’s classic dichotomy,5 does liberty relate to the absence of external barriers or constraints, where we enjoy it to the extent that no-one is preventing us from doing whatever we might want to do (negative liberty)? Or does it concern the presence of internal factors, where we enjoy liberty to the extent that we are able to take control of our lives and self-determine in our own interests (positive liberty)?6 These complex philosophical perspectives cannot be ignored and are, to varying degrees, protected by other Convention articles.7 But article 5 is not concerned with such broad notions of liberty because it contemplates liberty in its classic sense.
  • Compiled by Linda English

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-909-72651-2 — Mental Illness, Human Rights and the Law Brendan D. Kelly Index More Information Index Compiled by Linda English admission order 17 Bentham, Jeremy 4, 6 Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 best interests 16, 18, 45, 57 72, 93–94 Mental Capacity Bill 2015 69–70, 74, 75, advance statements: Scotland 150, 152, 79, 86, 97, 100, 204, 215 153–155, 166 Mental Health Act 2001 120–121, 122, advocacy 123, 130, 131 ECHR 20 Mental Health (Care and Treatment) Mental Capacity Bill 2015 85–86, 98 (Scotland) Act 2003 145–146, 147–148 Mental Health Act 2007 57–58, 60, 86, Better Services for the Mentally Ill (White Paper) 199 36 Mental Health (Care and Treatment) Bill of Rights 1689: English 3–4 (Scotland) Act 2003 135, 139, 149, 155 Bill of Rights 1791: US 4 power 190, 194–195, 196, 199 Burke, Edmund 5, 6 social advocacy 214 alcohol or drugs addiction 16, 37, 48, 94–95, Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam 109 11 Aristotle 2 capacity see mental capacity Ashworth Hospital 42–43 Care in the Community (DHSS) 36 Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill Chartism 5 2013 31, 70, 72, 73, 93–94, 95–96 China 192–193, 194, 198 asylums 7–8, 13, 35, 104, 181 chlorpromazine 13 asylum seekers 178 Cicero: natural law 3, 4 autonomy 211 civil partners: nearest relative 52, 59 dignity and 38, 57, 58, 61, 102, 150 Civil Partnership Act 2004 52 Ireland 122, 129, 130, 206, 207 clinical practice: rights promotion 211, Mental Health Act 2007 52–53, 56, 57, 58, 212–213 61 Clunis, Christopher 40 Northern Ireland 64, 65,
  • A SUMMARY of MENTAL HEALTH CASELAW Scott Blair, Advocate

    A SUMMARY of MENTAL HEALTH CASELAW Scott Blair, Advocate

    A SUMMARY OF MENTAL HEALTH CASELAW Scott Blair, Advocate BACKGROUND In December 2011 the Mental Heath Tribunal for Scotland (“MHTS”) published an excellent Digest of Cases covering the work of the MHTS until around the summer of 2011. The Digest was principally concerned with appeal decisions. Inspired by this I thought there might be merit in offering up a further contribution to this area. I have included cases decided since the Digest was published and have also included cases not mentioned in the Digest. For what they are worth I have offered my comments on these cases based on both my experience as an advocate in legal practice but also as a Convener of the MHTS. The MHTS has been with us for some time now and there is now a fair body of case law. This is my own contribution to a growing recognition of the need for collections of case law which are accessible and as up to date as possible in this field of Scots law. It is fair to say that the Scottish section of this paper would not have been possible but for the efforts of Valerie Mays at MHTS who led the way with the Digest which made my own task one where I was not starting from a “standing start”. The Scottish section follows a similar format to the Digest. That is deliberate. The approach taken in the Digest is excellent and makes the task of the reader an easy one. I acknowledge my profound debt to her for her earlier work. In the Scottish section, unless the context suggests otherwise, references to the Act, the 2003 Act or a Section are to be taken to be references to the Mental Health (Care and Treatment)(Scotland) Act 2003.
  • 00 MENTAL HEALTH 2012 Edn 00-291.Qxd 22/12/11 14:21 Page 1

    00 MENTAL HEALTH 2012 Edn 00-291.Qxd 22/12/11 14:21 Page 1

    00 MENTAL HEALTH 2012 edn 00-291.qxd 22/12/11 14:21 Page 1 Chapter 1 Background to the Mental Health Act 2007 Introduction The Mental Health Act, as passed in 2007 and largely implemented in 2008, is the result of ten years of debate. Many will see the Act as a disappointing conclusion to such a lengthy period of discussion and analysis. It is essentially an amendment Act which reforms the existing Mental Health Act 1983. In its final version the Act is not a particularly radical reform and it preserves most of the existing law. The UK Government’s initial plans were more radical but they met significant resistance as we shall see in this chapter. We will also look at the main changes in summary form. The structure of this book This book is essentially concerned with the Mental Health Act 1983 as revised by the 2007 amendments and as it operates in England and Wales. There are some differences between the two countries in terms of the Act but more significantly with the various rules, regulations and Codes of Practice. We try to highlight the differences where they are significant. The text of the Act itself is included within this book but occasionally readers may need to access the internet or seek other source materials for particular references (such as the Reference Guide). The book contains some material on the Mental Capacity Act because of its relevance to mental health law. The aim is to simplify the law as far as possible to make it accessible to professionals and to those affected by the law.
  • Modernising the Mental Health Act

    Modernising the Mental Health Act

    Modernising the Mental Health Act Increasing choice, reducing compulsion Final report of the Independent Review of the Mental Health Act 1983 December 2018 © Crown copyright 2018 Published to GOV.UK in pdf format only. www.gov.uk/dhsc This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. 1 Contents FOREWORD - REVIEW CHAIR .......................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - REVIEW CHAIR AND VICE CHAIRS. 16 LETTER FROM THE REVIEW'S SERVICE USER AND CARER GROUP ....................... 35 HOW THE REVIEW CARRIED OUT ITS WORK .............................................................. 39 THE CASE FOR CHANGE ................................................................................................ 45 UNDERSTANDING RISING RATES OF DETENTION .................................................. 49 SERVICE USER EXPERIENCE ..................................................................................... 53 STEPS TO TACKLE THE DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBER OF PEOPLE FROM ETHNIC MINORITY COMMUNITIES DETAINED UNDER THE ACT ............................ 58 HOW WE ARE MEETING OUR HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS ................................ 60 MENTAL CAPACITY AND DECISION MAKING IN THE MHA......................................
  • Mental Health Act 2007: Workbook Hospital Managers

    Mental Health Act 2007: Workbook Hospital Managers

    Mental Health Act 2007: Workbook Hospital Managers Hospital Managers Workbook Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 About this workbook................................................................................................1 How to use the workbook........................................................................................1 Module objectives ...................................................................................................2 Before you begin... ..................................................................................................3 The Mental Health Act 2007.......................................................................................10 Mental health legislation review ............................................................................10 Outline of the key changes to the Mental Health Act 1983....................................12 Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice for Wales .............................................14 The empowerment principles ................................................................................15 The equity principles .............................................................................................15 The effectiveness and efficiency principles ...........................................................15 What does all this mean for hospital managers?...................................................16 Discharge of