How to Find Us New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

How to find us New York By Subway Take the 6 line to 51st Street station Take the 1 line to 50th Street station Take the B,D,F or M line to 47-50 Streets / Rockerfeller Center station Follow signs for the exit at 51st Street & Follow signs for the exit at 50th Street & Lexington Ave, SE corner Broadway, SE corner Follow signs for the exit at 48th Street & 6th Av, NE Corner You will find the entrance to our building You will find the entrance to our building on 49th Street between Madison Ave and on 49th Street between Madison Ave and You will find the entrance to our building Fifth Ave Fifth Ave on 48th Street between Madison Ave and Fifth Ave Check in at the Visitor desk and you will Check in at the Visitor desk and you will be directed to the 33rd Fl. Follow signs for be directed to the 33rd Fl. Follow signs for Check in at the Visitor desk and you will our office, Suite 3301 our office, Suite 3301 be directed to the 33rd Fl. Follow signs for our office, Suite 3301 By Train By Taxi The closest station by MetroNorth is The closest station by Amtrak, Long There are two entrances to Tower Grand Central Island Railroad or NJ Transit is Penn 49: 48th Street or 49th Street between StationTransfer to the uptown bound E Madison Ave and Fifth Ave Follow signs for the exit at Vanderbuilt line to 5th Ave & 53rd St station Ave & Est 45th Street Check in at the Visitor desk and you will Follow signs for the exit at Madison Av & be directed to the 33rd Fl. Follow signs for You will find the entrance to our building 53rd St, Southside our office, Suite 3301 on 48th Street between Madison Ave and Fifth Ave You will find the entrance to our building on 49th Street between Madison Ave and Check in at the Visitor desk and you will Fifth Ave be directed to the 33rd Fl. Follow signs for our office, Suite 3301 Check in at the Visitor desk and you will be directed to the 33rd Fl. Follow signs for our office, Suite 3301 Grand Central Pen Station COBEPA North America Inc. I Tower 49 - 12 East 49th Street - New York, NY 10017 - United States I Tel: +1 (646) 679 5177 I http://www.cobepa.com.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Michele Oka Doner
Michele Oka Doner Strategic Misbehavior Michele Oka Doner Contents Introduction Ai Kato 7 Strategic Misbehavior Deborah Rothschild 9 Artwork Michele Oka Doner 23 Biography 56 Exhibition Checklist 57 Introduction Tower 49 Gallery is honored to present a provocative installation by Michele Oka Doner. Strategic Misbehavior converts Tower 49’s corporate environment into a theatrical stage set with fantastical elements inspired by the natural world. I was first introduced to the work of Michele Oka Doner at a private sale exhibition, The Shaman’s Hut, at Christie’s in November of 2015. I was taken with the fine delicacy and elegance Michele consistently mastered throughout five decades of work. My second encounter with Michele’s work was A Walk on the Beach, a site- specific art installation at the Miami International Airport, consisting of cast bronzes including seaweed, shells, stems, and assorted aquatic forms. Michele transformed a busy commuter atmosphere into a walk along the shores of Miami. Glancing at the ground, travelers were mesmerized to discover ethereal, golden, natural motifs guiding them through the airport. Michele expertly imbues urban and cold settings with a serene and whimsical ambience, calming viewers and striking intrigue with art in unlikely spaces. I was eager for Michele to grace Tower 49 Gallery with the feeling of discovering nature in a concrete jungle. Tower 49 Gallery is an art exhibition space, but also serves as a public access way and lobby space for Tower 49 offices and tenants. I anticipate that all who enter Tower 49 will explore and engage Michele’s mythical, mystical creatures, reliefs,and photographs–all inspired by the natural world.
[Show full text]
Tower Floors Available Sixth&Rock 64 WEST 48Th Street
TOWER FLOORS AVAILABLE sixth&rock 64 WEST 48TH STREET www.64w48.com availability features entire 16th floor –3,918 rsf - LEASED > located across from Rockefeller Center entire 15th floor –3,918 rsf with convenient access to entire 9th floor – 7,852 rsf Grand Central/Times Square transit and part 8th floor – 4,012 rsf - LEASED B, D, F, V, N, R, W trains entire 6th floor – 9,197 rsf > attended lobby entire 4th floor - 9,197 rsf - LEASED > newly renovated elevator cabs and lobby entire 3rd floor - 9,197 rsf - LEASED > tenant controlled HVAC; submetered electric addtional space can be made available > financially stable ownership with 100 years of con- tinuous operation term: flexible > new windows throughout, offering excellent views work: will build to suit 15TH FLOOR PRE-BUILD CONSTRUCTION UNDER WAY rent: upon request contact COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL NY LLC Louis Prisco | 212.716.3534 | [email protected] 380 Madison Avenue Eric Lassoff | 212.716.3528 | [email protected] New York, NY 10017 Peter Shakalis | 212.716.3850 | [email protected] www.colliers.com Heschel 33 Metropolitan 654 655 Christ 770 HS W 60 1841 B'way Club Mad Mad Ch Lex W 60TH STREET N,R,W E 60TH STREET W 60TH STREET E 60TH STREET Roosevelt E 60TH STREET Prof Harmonie 14 Polo All Child 645 Island Ch St Paul N,R,W Club E 60 Ralph Mad Saints Sch Apostle 750 Tramway QUEENSBORO BRIDGE 425 Time Warner Lauren Lex Bloomingdale's Ch 505 Lighthouse W 59 Center 650 Mad 635 55 1,A,B Mad E 59 Park 111 E 59 Bridgemarket CENTRAL PARK S W 59TH STREET 60 Columbus
[Show full text]
Commercial and Federal Litigation Section Newsletter a Publication of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association
NYSBA FALL 2001 | VOL. 7 | NO. 1 Commercial and Federal Litigation Section Newsletter A publication of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association A Message from the A Message from the Outgoing Chair Incoming Chair I welcome the opportunity, As your incoming Chair, I through this newsletter, to keep want to share with you the the 1,800 Section members excitement I feel about our Sec- informed about Section news tion in the coming year. Thanks and provide information that is to the groundwork done by helpful in daily practice, as the Sharon Porcellio, the Section is dedicated and energetic 2001- in its strongest position in years. 2002 officers assume their new Moreover, I want you to be roles. This issue contains an aware of the dedication and update on Section activities, energy exhibited by the individ- recent CPLR amendments, and uals whom you selected to serve Executive Committee Meeting as officers with me. In addition, summaries. For additional information, including the there are numerous people on the Executive Committee Commercial Division Law Report, please visit the Section who have volunteered and are working hard to make Web site at http://www.nysba.org/sections/comfed. this a great year for our Section. On behalf of the Section, I appreciate your support and This incoming message will have several purposes: welcome your involvement at every level—from read- to recognize certain people, to advise you of new offer- ing the Section’s publications and attending CLE pro- ings by our Section, and to discuss with you certain grams to active committee involvement.
[Show full text]
Chapter 5: Shadows
Chapter 5: Shadows A. INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the detailed shadow study that was conducted to determine whether the proposed One Vanderbilt development would cast any new shadows on sunlight-sensitive resources. Sunlight-sensitive resources can include parks, playgrounds, residential or office plazas, and other publicly accessible open spaces; sunlight-dependent features of historic resources; and important natural features such as water bodies. Since the preparation of the shadow analysis in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), the height of the proposed One Vanderbilt development was increased. The shadow analysis in this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been revised to reflect this change including Figures 5-1 to 5-22 and 5-27. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS This analysis compared shadows that would be cast by the proposed One Vanderbilt development, which would be built to a floor area ratio (FAR) of 30, with those that would be cast by the 15 FAR building that would be developed absent the proposed actions (the 15 FAR No-Action building). As described below, the analysis concluded that the proposed 30 FAR One Vanderbilt development would cast new shadows on Bryant Park, the west windows of Grand Central Terminal’s main concourse and several other sunlight-sensitive resources. However, the new shadows would be limited in extent, duration and effects and would not result in any significant adverse shadow impacts, as demonstrated in detail below. B. DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGY This analysis has been prepared in accordance with CEQR procedures and follows the guidelines of the 2014 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual. DEFINITIONS Incremental shadow is the additional, or new, shadow that a structure resulting from a project would cast on a sunlight-sensitive resource.
[Show full text]
4. Open Space
East Midtown Rezoning and Related Actions FEIS 4. Open Space 4.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the potential effects on open space that could result from the Proposed Action. Open space is defined as publicly or privately owned land that is publicly accessible and operates, functions, or is available for leisure, play, or sport, or set aside for the protection and/or enhancement of the natural environment. Open space that is used for sports, exercise, or active play is classified as active, while open space that is used for relaxation, such as sitting or strolling, is classified as passive. According to the CEQR Technical Manual, an analysis of open space is conducted to determine whether a proposed action would have a direct impact resulting from the elimination or alteration of open space and/or an indirect impact resulting from overtaxing available open space. The Proposed Action would rezone an area encompassing approximately 70 blocks in the East Midtown area of Manhattan to establish the East Midtown Subdistrict within the Midtown Special District. Under the reasonable worst-case development scenario (RWCDS), the Proposed Action would result in approximately 10,340,972 gross square feet (gsf) of office floor area, 648,990 gsf of retail floor area, 2,134,234 gsf of hotel floor area, 207,029 gsf of residential floor area, as well as 140,200 gsf of parking floor area. Compared to the No-Action condition, the RWCDS would result in a net increase in the number of employees and a net decrease in the number of residents. Therefore, in accordance with CEQR guidelines, the open space analysis of the Proposed Action evaluated the change in non-residential population relative to the total amount of passive open space in the study area; while active open spaces were identified, these open spaces were not included in the analysis because non-residents, specifically workers, tend to use passive open spaces.
[Show full text]
Carl Schwartz Principal
CARL SCHWARTZ The RINALDI PRINCIPAL G R O U P PROFILE Project Management - Strategic Planning- Acquisitions A result oriented, hands on Construction and Development Professional, with 30 years of expertise that has provided outstanding success in all facets of the industry with a verifiable track record for the successful completion of multi-million dollar projects. The success of the projects were due to the strides and accomplishments of coordinating trades, developing partnerships, and building positive rapport with the architects & engineers, local officials, vendors, and the client while maintaining the budget by controlling costs. Versed in Contract Negotiations, Estimating, Impending Design Problems, Document Preparation, Building Codes & Regulations, Material Purchasing, and Site Management from project inception through the obtaining of a Certificate of Occupancy, empower the adherence to the project requirements of the client. The ability to manage multiple projects, by strategically selecting & administering the personnel necessary to carry out each project as per the requirements of the client, creates an environment of success and allows for the successful implementation of each project program. [email protected] PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE The Rinaldi Group – Secaucus, NJ Principal Residences at Mandarin Oriental 685 Fifth Avenue New York, NY Located in Manhattan’s Plaza District neighborhood, this existing 20-Story property located at 685 Fifth Avenue was built in 1926 on the block encompassing “the world’s most expensive real estate” and the country’s highest retail on average annually at $3,000/SF in 2017, as referenced by the New York Times. This most prestigious corner property located on 54th Street & Fifth Avenue between Central Park and Rockefeller Center will undergo a significant upgrade structurally removing the existing roof structure and adding 10-Stories to this historical residential building.
[Show full text]
Commercial and Federal Litigation Section Newsletter a Publication of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association
NYSBA SUMMER 2008 | Vol. 14 | No. 2 Commercial and Federal Litigation Section Newsletter A publication of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association A Message from the A Message from the Outgoing Chair Incoming Chair It is with a great sense of I am pleased and honored productivity and pride that I to write to you for the ﬁ rst time pass the chairpersonship of this as Chair of the Commercial and Section to your new Chair, Peter Federal Litigation Section. The Brown. The intelligence, hard responsibilities of Chair are a work, and dedication of our personal challenge, as I strive to Section members are outstand- meet the high standards of the ing and, as a result, the Section distinguished series of Bar lead- had a tremendous year: we had ers who have preceded me. I am record-breaking attendance at honored to serve this year under our Annual and Spring Meet- Carrie H. Cohen New York State Bar Association Peter Brown ings, numerous written reports President Bernice Leber. Bernice from our committees on timely litigation topics, and began her extraordinary record of Bar leadership as fantastic CLE programs. Chair of this Section. She is a dynamic leader, who will lead the Association to exceed the expectations of the lawyers of New York. (Continued on page 2) (Continued on page 2) Inside Section Welcomes New Officers: Use of Diagrams and Photographs in Appellate Briefs Jonathan D. Lupkin and Victoria Zaydman ............................... 4 in New York State Courts ............................................................14 Report on the Spring Meeting ............................................................5 Section Supports Celebration of Cultural Diversity in the New York Legal Community ......................................................18 Committee Spotlight: (Kathy M.
[Show full text]
Manhattan Office Market
Manhattan Off ce Market 3 RD QUARTER 2016 REPORT A NEWS RECAP AND MARKET SNAPSHOT Pictured: 200 Park Avenue South Looking Ahead Tax Plan Proposal Could Potentially Help Leveraged RE Firms An emerging tax plan proposed by Republican candidate Donald Trump could reportedly benef t debt-laden real estate companies by coupling 2-policies — letting businesses deduct interest and allowing expensing, or immediate write-offs, for investments in equipment and buildings. The proposal would “provide negative tax rates for investments f nanced with debt, creating incentives for companies to pursue projects that wouldn’t make sense economically without the tax benef ts.” Currently tax law requires businesses to spread the deductions over multiple years, but under Trump’s proposed plan “a business would be able to generate signif cant losses in the f rst year of an investment and then generate ongoing interest deductions. Those losses could be carried forward and used to offset future income.” It is reportedly the intended goal of the tax plan, which is still a work-in-progress, to “tie expensing to job creation and new investment and not, for example, purchases of existing leveraged real estate portfolios,” according to reported comments by a Trump advisor. Interest Deductions: The pairing of an end to interest deductions and expensing is typically done to prevent giving an extra subsidy according to some sources, however it is anticipated that the taking away of interest deductibility would make it hard for businesses to capitalize; and with that in mind Trump had proposed an unspecif ed “reasonable cap” in an earlier proposed tax plan.
[Show full text]
GRAND CENTRAL SUBDISTRICT Projected Development Scenarios
GRAND CENTRAL SUBDISTRicr Department of City Planning New York City 1991 Grand Central. Subdistrict Department of City Planning New York City November, 1991 DCP# 91-17 Contents PREFACE OVERVIEW OF THE SUBDISTRICT Introduction . 1 Density and Transfer Provisions .... ..... .. .. .. .. ..... 4 Urban Design Controls .......................... .. ... 5 BACKGROUND History of Grand Central Terminal and Area Development . .. ... 7 Section 74-79 -Transfer of Development Rights From Landmark Sites ........... ........ .. ...... ..... 9 Underlying Zoning Regulation .~ ..... ............... .... 12 Recent Development and Planning Activities . 15 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE GRAND CENTRAL SUBDISTRICT Projected Development Scenarios ......................... 21 Neighborhood Character/Urban Design .... .. .... ........ ... 28 Pedestrian Network Plan ............... .. ... .... ... 37 Historic Resources .............................. .... 53 Open Space . .. 57 Transportation and Air Quality ......... ... .. : .. ..... .. ... 58 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FOR THE GRAND CENTRAL SUBDISTRICT Broader Boundaries for the Subdistrict . .. .. .. .. .. .. 67 Floor Area Caps Above and Below 21.6 FAR . ......... .... 69 As-of-Right Transfers ......................... .. .... 70 APPENDICES Appendix A: Applications Made for 74-79 Transfers ..... .... 71 Appendix B: Pedestrian Network Improvements ............. 73 Appendix C: Grand Central Terminal Preservation Work Items .... 77 Appendix D: Open Space in the Grand Central Area .... .. ... 81 Appendix
[Show full text]
Chapter 7: Urban Design and Visual Resources
Chapter 7: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION This chapter considers the potential of the proposed actions to impact urban design and visual resources. As defined in the 2014 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual, urban design is the totality of components that may affect a pedestrian’s experience of public space. A visual resource can include views of the waterfront, public parks, landmark structures or districts, or otherwise distinct buildings, and natural resources. The following analysis considers a 400-foot study area around the proposed Vanderbilt Corridor which includes the One Vanderbilt site. The study area considers where the proposed actions would be most likely to influence land use patterns and the built environment (see Figures 7-1 and 7-2).1 This analysis also considers longer views to the One Vanderbilt site, including views along West 42nd Street, from Bryant Park, and from Gantry Plaza State Park in Long Island City, Queens. This analysis addresses the urban design and visual resources of the study area for existing conditions, the future without the proposed actions (the No-Action Condition), and the future with the proposed actions (With-Action Condition) for the 2021 Build year, when the proposed One Vanderbilt development is expected to be completed and occupied. Based on the CEQR Technical Manual, a preliminary assessment of urban design and visual resources is appropriate when there is the potential for a pedestrian to observe, from the street level, a physical alteration beyond that allowed by existing zoning. Examples include projects that permit the modification of yard, height, and setback requirements, and projects that result in an increase in built floor area beyond what would be allowed “as‐of‐right” or in the No-Action condition.
[Show full text]
Chapter 4: Open Space
Chapter 4: Open Space A. INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the potential impacts of the proposed actions on open space resources in the area surrounding the One Vanderbilt site. Open space is defined by the 2014 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual as publicly accessible, publicly or privately owned land that is available for leisure, play, or sport, or serves to protect or enhance the natural environment. The CEQR Technical Manual guidelines indicate that an open space analysis should be conducted if an action would result in a direct effect, such as the physical loss or alteration of public open space, or an indirect effect, such as when a substantial new population could place added demand on an area’s open spaces. The proposed actions would facilitate the development of an approximately 1.8 million-gross- square-foot (gsf), (1,299,390-zoning-square-foot [zsf]), 30.0 floor area ratio (FAR) building (the proposed One Vanderbilt development) on a site owned by Green 317 Madison LLC (317 Madison). The proposed One Vanderbilt development would contain a mix of uses including office, trading floors, retail, restaurant, transit access, a transit hall at ground level, and rooftop amenity space, and would utilize floor area bonuses pursuant to the Grand Central Public Realm Improvement and landmark transfer special permits. As part of the proposed One Vanderbilt development, 317 Madison would provide the improvements to the Vanderbilt Avenue public place dedicated to pedestrian uses. The proposed One Vanderbilt development would result in the introduction of commercial uses that would substantially increase the non-residential population in the area.
[Show full text]
Spring Mills Building
Landmarks Preservation Commission April 13, 2010, Designation List 428 LP-2385 SPRINGS MILLS BUILDING, 104 West 40th Street (aka 102-106 West 40th Street, 107-115 West 39th Street), Manhattan Built 1961-63; Harrison & Abramovitz, architects, Charles H. Abbe, chief designer Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 815, Lot 21 On November 17, 2009, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Springs Mills Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 3). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with provisions of law. Four people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the owner, New York State Assembly Member Richard N. Gottfried, the Historic Districts Council, and Docomomo New York/Tri-State. Summary The Springs Mills Building is a 21-story office tower located in midtown Manhattan on a mid-block site, close to Bryant Park and just south of Times Square. Constructed in 1961-63 for a leading American textile manufacturer, it rises from an irregular L-shaped lot that connects West 39th and 40th Streets. At the time of construction, many businesses associated with the textile industry were migrating from lower Manhattan to the Garment District. Springs Cotton Mills was founded in 1914, when Leroy Springs assumed control of the Fort Mill Manufacturing Company. A New York sales office was established by 1946 and in subsequent years the company became the largest producer of sheets and pillow cases in the United States. Harrison & Abramovitz, who designed many notable buildings following the Second World War, served as architect.
[Show full text]