DOCSLIB.ORG

Commercial and Federal Litigation Section Newsletter a Publication of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commercial and Federal Litigation Section Newsletter a Publication of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association NYSBA SUMMER 2008 | Vol. 14 | No. 2 Commercial and Federal Litigation Section Newsletter A publication of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association A Message from the A Message from the Outgoing Chair Incoming Chair It is with a great sense of I am pleased and honored productivity and pride that I to write to you for the fi rst time pass the chairpersonship of this as Chair of the Commercial and Section to your new Chair, Peter Federal Litigation Section. The Brown. The intelligence, hard responsibilities of Chair are a work, and dedication of our personal challenge, as I strive to Section members are outstand- meet the high standards of the ing and, as a result, the Section distinguished series of Bar lead- had a tremendous year: we had ers who have preceded me. I am record-breaking attendance at honored to serve this year under our Annual and Spring Meet- Carrie H. Cohen New York State Bar Association Peter Brown ings, numerous written reports President Bernice Leber. Bernice from our committees on timely litigation topics, and began her extraordinary record of Bar leadership as fantastic CLE programs. Chair of this Section. She is a dynamic leader, who will lead the Association to exceed the expectations of the lawyers of New York. (Continued on page 2) (Continued on page 2) Inside Section Welcomes New Officers: Use of Diagrams and Photographs in Appellate Briefs Jonathan D. Lupkin and Victoria Zaydman ............................... 4 in New York State Courts ............................................................14 Report on the Spring Meeting ............................................................5 Section Supports Celebration of Cultural Diversity in the New York Legal Community ......................................................18 Committee Spotlight: (Kathy M. Kass) Committee on Immigration Litigation ........................................ 8 Federal Sentencing in White Collar Cases ......................................19 Stellar Panel of Jurists of Color Presents CLE Program (Harry Sandick) “Pathways to the Bench” .............................................................10 (Carla M. Miller) Section’s 2007 Empire State Counsel ...............................................20 Cesar A. Perales Receives 2008 CPLR Amendments: 2008 Legislative Session ...............................21 Hon. George Bundy Smith Award ..............................................11 2008 Amendments to the Uniform Rules for Supreme (Susan M. Davies) and County Courts, Rules Governing Appeals, and Foundation Awards Section’s 2008 Minority Law Student Certain Other Rules of Interest to Civil Litigators ...................22 Fellowship to Fordham Student .................................................12 Notes of the Section’s Executive Committee Meetings ................ 23 (Susan M. Davies) Notice of New Electronic Filing and Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules ........................................................................... 13 (Victoria Zaydman) ComFedNewsSum08.indd 1 9/3/2008 3:18:13 PM A Message from the Outgoing Chair Continued from page 1 Starting in the winter at our Annual Meeting, we (which report was drafted by our CPLR Committee and is were especially fortunate to have the Honorable Judith S. scheduled to be presented to the NYSBA House of Del- Kaye present our Section’s Stanley H. Fuld Award to the egates), and the legal implications of linking and framing Honorable Albert N. Rosenblatt. In the early spring, our in Internet usage. Section held our Second Annual Smooth Moves event In addition, the editions of the NYLitigator and News- at which the Honorable George Bundy Smith presented letter were particularly robust during this past year; and the 2008 Honorable George Bundy Smith Pioneer Award the Section is grateful to our tireless editors, David Fioc- to Cesar A. Perales, the President and General Counsel cola and Mark L. Davies, respectively. I also am pleased to of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, report that our Section actively worked to meet immedi- at a reception held at Lincoln Center for the Performing ate past NYSBA President Kate Madigan’s membership Arts. And in the late spring, we had our Spring Meeting challenge and our membership increased signifi cantly at the Equinox in Vermont, at which we teamed up with during this past year. the Young Lawyers Section to present dual-track CLE programming targeted to junior litigators. In addition, Finally, all of our success this past year would not at that meeting, we were honored to have the Honorable have been possible without the constant support and help Kevin T. Duffy, United States District Judge, Southern from my fellow offi cers, Peter Brown, Vincent Syracuse, District of New York, bestow our Robert L. Haig Award Susan Davies, and Kyana McCain, to whom I am forever on our former Section Chair, the Honorable P. Kevin grateful. In addition, immediate past NYSBA President Castel, United States District Judge, Southern District of Kate Madigan and current NYSBA President Bernice New York. Leber led by example and were a constant source of inspi- ration to our Section leadership. I also would be remiss if I As I have said throughout my tenure, the work of did not thank all of our past Section Chairs who unselfi sh- our committees is the heart of our Section, and they were ly continue to give their time and expertise to our Section. particularly productive this year with reports on a wide array of timely topics, including the Individual Practices Thanks again to all of you for your hard work and of Judges and Magistrates in the Southern District of dedication. It has been my pleasure and honor to serve as New York, contact with putative class members, antitrust your Chair. cases from the past United States Supreme Court term, proposed changes to the CPLR regarding e-discovery Carrie H. Cohen A Message from the Incoming Chair Continued from page 1 At our recent Spring Meeting I had the opportunity Our Chair-Elect, Vince Syracuse, has served the Section to thank our outgoing Chair, Carrie H. Cohen, for her in a number of capacities, including several years as the year of record accomplishments. The Section increased Section’s Treasurer, while leading one of our most suc- its membership, to over 2,600 members. Our commit- cessful CLE programs on ethics and civility in the profes- tee Chairs organized a record number of CLE programs sion. Our Treasurer, Susan Davies, has served the Section which served Section members and lawyers across the as Secretary in the past and is now keeping us on budget. state. Through constant attention and thoughtful com- Jonathan Lupkin has served as Editor of the NYLitigator, ments, Carrie encouraged our committee leaders to issue the Section’s journal for fi ve years and also Co-Chaired useful and timely reports on many important areas of the Committee on Commercial Division Law Report. The concern to commercial litigators. The Section owes her a newest member of our team, Victoria Zaydman, is our en- debt of gratitude for an outstanding year of leadership. thusiastic new Secretary. She was selected because of her I am certain that Carrie will continue her service to the potential for further contributions in the years ahead. NYSBA in the future, but her service to the Section will Finally, I must add a personal note of gratitude to not be forgotten. Kyana McCain, a junior associate at my former law fi rm, I feel confi dent about the year ahead because I am who agreed to take on the job of Section Secretary this supported by an experienced team of Section leaders. Continued on page 3 2 NYSBA Commercial and Federal Litigation Section Newsletter | Summer 2008 | Vol. 14 | No. 2 ComFedNewsSum08.indd 2 9/3/2008 3:19:51 PM A Message from the Incoming Chair Continued from page 2 past year, supporting Carrie Cohen despite a demand- Second, the Section provides the opportunity to meet ing workload. Unfortunately, her recent marriage and and work directly with state and federal judges in your relocation out of state made it diffi cult for her to continue region. A number of current and retired judges serve on as an offi cer with the Section. I wish her all success in her the Section’s committees. They are also frequent con- personal and professional life. tributors to the Section’s many successful CLE programs. Developing a relationship with judges in your area will Our outgoing President Kate Madigan initiated an enhance your professional standing in your community. effort to grow the New York State Bar Association mem- The insights learned in dealing with judges on Section bership during the coming year. We all recognize that in activities will make you a more effective advocate when private practice the pressure to produce billable hours you appear in court on behalf of your clients. has discouraged some lawyers from participating in Bar activities. If you are reading this message, you have al- Third, Section activities allow you to network with ready decided that membership can enhance your career. a broad cross-section of the Bar in your community. A I ask that you encourage the lawyers in your respective younger lawyer can build a professional reputation by fi rms or your friends to join the Section. In particular, the becoming active in Section activities. You will gain access membership of the Section does not accurately refl ect to Bar and law fi rm leaders who can enhance your career the growing diversity of the Bar across the state. In the in many ways. For more experienced lawyers, this Section coming year I hope to encourage minority lawyers and offers an opportunity to focus on your professional prac- woman to join the Section in larger numbers and contrib- tice specialties to help shape the direction of the law. The ute their unique experiences to the Section’s activities. Section is always in need of committed and knowledge- able leaders who are prepared to commit time to com- About half of our Section’s members have not signed mittee activities. The Section’s many activities, from CLE up to join one of our many committees.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2011 Table of Contents
    AABANY Year-End Report for 2011 Table of Contents AABANY Year-End Report for 2011 ...................................................................................................... 1 Academic Committee Report ................................................................................................................. 12 Audit and Finance Committee Report .................................................................................................... 13 Communications Committee Report ...................................................................................................... 14 Corporate Law Committee ..................................................................................................................... 15 Government and Public Sector Committee ............................................................................................ 16 Immigration and Nationality Law Committee ........................................................................................ 17 In-House Counsel Committee ................................................................................................................. 18 Intellectual Property Committee ............................................................................................................. 19 Issues Committee .................................................................................................................................... 22 Judiciary Committee ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Michele Oka Doner
    Michele Oka Doner Strategic Misbehavior Michele Oka Doner Contents Introduction Ai Kato 7 Strategic Misbehavior Deborah Rothschild 9 Artwork Michele Oka Doner 23 Biography 56 Exhibition Checklist 57 Introduction Tower 49 Gallery is honored to present a provocative installation by Michele Oka Doner. Strategic Misbehavior converts Tower 49’s corporate environment into a theatrical stage set with fantastical elements inspired by the natural world. I was first introduced to the work of Michele Oka Doner at a private sale exhibition, The Shaman’s Hut, at Christie’s in November of 2015. I was taken with the fine delicacy and elegance Michele consistently mastered throughout five decades of work. My second encounter with Michele’s work was A Walk on the Beach, a site- specific art installation at the Miami International Airport, consisting of cast bronzes including seaweed, shells, stems, and assorted aquatic forms. Michele transformed a busy commuter atmosphere into a walk along the shores of Miami. Glancing at the ground, travelers were mesmerized to discover ethereal, golden, natural motifs guiding them through the airport. Michele expertly imbues urban and cold settings with a serene and whimsical ambience, calming viewers and striking intrigue with art in unlikely spaces. I was eager for Michele to grace Tower 49 Gallery with the feeling of discovering nature in a concrete jungle. Tower 49 Gallery is an art exhibition space, but also serves as a public access way and lobby space for Tower 49 offices and tenants. I anticipate that all who enter Tower 49 will explore and engage Michele’s mythical, mystical creatures, reliefs,and photographs–all inspired by the natural world.
    [Show full text]
  • Tower Floors Available Sixth&Rock 64 WEST 48Th Street
    TOWER FLOORS AVAILABLE sixth&rock 64 WEST 48TH STREET www.64w48.com availability features entire 16th floor –3,918 rsf - LEASED > located across from Rockefeller Center entire 15th floor –3,918 rsf with convenient access to entire 9th floor – 7,852 rsf Grand Central/Times Square transit and part 8th floor – 4,012 rsf - LEASED B, D, F, V, N, R, W trains entire 6th floor – 9,197 rsf > attended lobby entire 4th floor - 9,197 rsf - LEASED > newly renovated elevator cabs and lobby entire 3rd floor - 9,197 rsf - LEASED > tenant controlled HVAC; submetered electric addtional space can be made available > financially stable ownership with 100 years of con- tinuous operation term: flexible > new windows throughout, offering excellent views work: will build to suit 15TH FLOOR PRE-BUILD CONSTRUCTION UNDER WAY rent: upon request contact COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL NY LLC Louis Prisco | 212.716.3534 | [email protected] 380 Madison Avenue Eric Lassoff | 212.716.3528 | [email protected] New York, NY 10017 Peter Shakalis | 212.716.3850 | [email protected] www.colliers.com Heschel 33 Metropolitan 654 655 Christ 770 HS W 60 1841 B'way Club Mad Mad Ch Lex W 60TH STREET N,R,W E 60TH STREET W 60TH STREET E 60TH STREET Roosevelt E 60TH STREET Prof Harmonie 14 Polo All Child 645 Island Ch St Paul N,R,W Club E 60 Ralph Mad Saints Sch Apostle 750 Tramway QUEENSBORO BRIDGE 425 Time Warner Lauren Lex Bloomingdale's Ch 505 Lighthouse W 59 Center 650 Mad 635 55 1,A,B Mad E 59 Park 111 E 59 Bridgemarket CENTRAL PARK S W 59TH STREET 60 Columbus
    [Show full text]
  • New York Law School Magazine, Vol. 33, No. 2 New York Law School
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu NYLS Publications New York Law School Alumni Magazine 2014 New York Law School Magazine, Vol. 33, No. 2 New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/alum_mag Recommended Citation New York Law School, "New York Law School Magazine, Vol. 33, No. 2" (2014). New York Law School Alumni Magazine. Book 1. http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/alum_mag/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the NYLS Publications at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in New York Law School Alumni Magazine by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. Office of Marketing and Communications 185 West Broadway Magazine • 2014 • VOL. 33, nO. 2 New York, NY 10013-2921 SAVE THE DATE REUNION AND ALUMNI WEEKEND APRIl 23–25, 2015 Mark your calendars, and plan to celebrate New York Law School! The 2015 Reunion and Alumni Weekend is shaping up to be an extraordinary occasion for classes ending in 0 and 5—and for the entire NYLS community. You won’t want to miss it! Reunion Year Class Volunteers Needed Do you want to make sure your class is well represented at Reunion? E-mail [email protected] to join your class committee. cOngresswOMan nancY peLOsi The fuTure is nOw: nYLs Makes DeLiVers The shainwaLD pubLic iMpressiVe prOgress On achieVing inTeresT LecTure sTraTegic pLan gOaLs www.nyls.edu P6 P8 WE ARE NEW YORK’S LAW SCHOOL SINCE 1891 The Center for New York City Law marked its 20th year WE ARE NEW YORK’S LAW SCHOOL of presenting the CityLaw Breakfast Series in September, when it hosted Carl Weisbrod, Chair of the NYC Planning Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philip F. Reed Lecture Series, Panel Discussion, Sanctions in Electronic Discovery Cases: Views from the Judges
    Fordham Law Review Volume 78 Issue 1 Article 1 2009 The Philip F. Reed Lecture Series, Panel Discussion, Sanctions in Electronic Discovery Cases: Views From the Judges Hon. John M. Facciola Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte Hon. Loretta A. Preska Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hon. John M. Facciola, Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte, Hon. Loretta A. Preska, and Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin, The Philip F. Reed Lecture Series, Panel Discussion, Sanctions in Electronic Discovery Cases: Views From the Judges, 78 Fordham L. Rev. 1 (2009). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol78/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Philip F. Reed Lecture Series, Panel Discussion, Sanctions in Electronic Discovery Cases: Views From the Judges Cover Page Footnote This Panel Discussion was held on February 24, 2009, at Fordham University School of Law. The text of the Panel Discussion transcript has been lightly edited. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol78/iss1/1 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 78 October 2009 No. 1 CONTENTS THE PHILIP D. REED LECTURE SERIES Panel Discussion SANCTIONS IN ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY CASES: VIEWS FROM THE JUDGES ..... Hon. John M.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEW YORK EMPLOYEE ADVOCATE Nelanational Employment Lawyers Association/New York • Advocates for Employee Rights
    THE NEW YORK EMPLOYEE ADVOCATE NELANational Employment Lawyers Association/New York • Advocates for Employee Rights VOLUME 11, NO. 7 December 2003 Jonathan Ben-Asher, Editor Members to Vote in NELA Board Elections Filings, Trials and Settlements This fall, the NELA/NY Board of NELA/NY’s Executive Director, Shelley Directors revised NELA/NY’s Bylaws to Leinheardt, on or before December 5, In this column, we publish cases provide that the membership will vote to 2004. which NELA/NY members have fill two vacant seats on the Board each Statements in support of a candidate recently filed, tried or settled. Please year. The new procedures go into effect will be provided to each member either send information on your cases to this year, for the election of the 2004 electronically or in hard copy. In addi- Jonathan Ben-Asher at jb-a@bmbf. Board. tion, on December 10 we are holding an com. Please include the parties, Up to now, members of NELA New Open Membership Meeting, during which court, counsel for both sides, a short York’s Board of Directors have been candidates can discuss their interests and description of the underlying facts elected each December, by the current views. (6:00 p.m., at the office of Bern- and issues, and anything else which Board. In 2001, the Board revised the stein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossman, 1285 you think your colleagues would Bylaws so that Board members may only Avenue of the Americas). find particularly tantalizing. serve for five consecutive years. To put No later than December 22, 2003, Shel- Unfortunately, we have had only that change into effect, several Board ley will be sending to each member, by a few submissions for this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial and Federal Litigation Section Newsletter a Publication of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association
    NYSBA FALL 2001 | VOL. 7 | NO. 1 Commercial and Federal Litigation Section Newsletter A publication of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association A Message from the A Message from the Outgoing Chair Incoming Chair I welcome the opportunity, As your incoming Chair, I through this newsletter, to keep want to share with you the the 1,800 Section members excitement I feel about our Sec- informed about Section news tion in the coming year. Thanks and provide information that is to the groundwork done by helpful in daily practice, as the Sharon Porcellio, the Section is dedicated and energetic 2001- in its strongest position in years. 2002 officers assume their new Moreover, I want you to be roles. This issue contains an aware of the dedication and update on Section activities, energy exhibited by the individ- recent CPLR amendments, and uals whom you selected to serve Executive Committee Meeting as officers with me. In addition, summaries. For additional information, including the there are numerous people on the Executive Committee Commercial Division Law Report, please visit the Section who have volunteered and are working hard to make Web site at http://www.nysba.org/sections/comfed. this a great year for our Section. On behalf of the Section, I appreciate your support and This incoming message will have several purposes: welcome your involvement at every level—from read- to recognize certain people, to advise you of new offer- ing the Section’s publications and attending CLE pro- ings by our Section, and to discuss with you certain grams to active committee involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmation Hearing on Hon. Susan H. Black, Sonia Sotomayor, Loretta A
    CONFIRMATION HEARING ON HON. SUSAN H. BLACK, SONIA SOTOMAYOR, LORETTA A. PRESKA, AND IRENE M. KEELEY THURSDAY, JUNE 4, 1992 U.S. SENATE, COMMITrEE ON THE JUDICIARY, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:02 a.m., in room SD-226, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Ion. Edward M. Kennedy presiding. Present: Senators Kennedy and Thurmond. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR KENNEDY Senator KENNEDY. The committee will come to order. The Constitution gives the President and the SE.nate a shared re- sponsibility to ensure that qualified men and women serve on the Federal bench. As Senators, we have few more important responsi- bilities than our role in the confirmation process. The judges and Justices whom we approve will serve for life, and their decisions will determine, in large measure, the quality of justice in America. I am please to note that today, for the first time, the Judiciary Committee has scheduled a nominations hearing in which all of the nominees are women. This is a welcome development and under- scores our commitment to increasing the representation of women on the Federal bench. In the past 12 years, the proportion of women in the legal profes- sion has almost doubled, from 13 percent during the last year of the Carter administration to 23 percent today. Yet, only 16 percent of President Bush's judicial nominees are women, about the same as the 15-percent rate President Carter achieved during a time when there were far fewer women lawyers. Less than 9 percent of the sitting Federal judges are women.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Mandated Bank Liquidity Disclosures
    Consequences of Mandated Bank Liquidity Disclosures Anya Kleymenova* London Business School Regent’s Park London NW1 4SA, UK [email protected] November 2013 PRELIMINARY Please do not quote or circulate without permission. Abstract This paper studies the capital market consequences of unique and unexpected mandatory disclosures of banks’ liquidity and the resulting changes in banks’ behavior. I employ a hand-collected sample of the disclosures of banks’ borrowing from the US Federal Reserve Discount Window (DW) during the financial crisis. I find that these disclosures contain positive incremental market information as they decrease banks’ cost of capital (measured by the equity bid-ask spreads and the cost of debt). However, I also find evidence of endogenous costs associated with more disclosure. I document that banks respond to the DW disclosures by increasing their liquidity holdings and decreasing risky assets. In line with the theoretical predictions of Goldstein and Sapra (2013), this finding indicates that, following the DW disclosures, banks try to avoid accessing the DW facility, despite its cost of capital benefits. JEL classification: G18, G21, G28, M41 Keywords: Liquidity disclosure, discount window, consequences of disclosure, bank liquidity, prudential regulation of banks. * I started work on this paper during my PhD research internship at the Bank of England. I would like to thank the chair of my dissertation committee, Florin Vasvari, as well as Rhiannon Sowerbutts from the Bank of England for their generous support and guidance throughout this project. Discussions with Pat Akey, Allen Berger, Christa Bouwman, Michael Crawley (discussant), Emmanuel De George, Atif Ellahie, Sapnoti Eswar, John Kuong, Elizabeth Klee, Yun Lou, Maria Loumioti, Clemens Otto, Richard Rosen (discussant), Oded Rozenbaum, Oleg Rubanov, Tjomme Rusticus, Stephen Schaefer, Sasan Saiy (discussant), Haresh Sapra, İrem Tuna, Oktay Urcan, Joana Valente, Robert Verrecchia, and Irina Zviadadze have been extremely helpful.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Shadows
    Chapter 5: Shadows A. INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the detailed shadow study that was conducted to determine whether the proposed One Vanderbilt development would cast any new shadows on sunlight-sensitive resources. Sunlight-sensitive resources can include parks, playgrounds, residential or office plazas, and other publicly accessible open spaces; sunlight-dependent features of historic resources; and important natural features such as water bodies. Since the preparation of the shadow analysis in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), the height of the proposed One Vanderbilt development was increased. The shadow analysis in this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been revised to reflect this change including Figures 5-1 to 5-22 and 5-27. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS This analysis compared shadows that would be cast by the proposed One Vanderbilt development, which would be built to a floor area ratio (FAR) of 30, with those that would be cast by the 15 FAR building that would be developed absent the proposed actions (the 15 FAR No-Action building). As described below, the analysis concluded that the proposed 30 FAR One Vanderbilt development would cast new shadows on Bryant Park, the west windows of Grand Central Terminal’s main concourse and several other sunlight-sensitive resources. However, the new shadows would be limited in extent, duration and effects and would not result in any significant adverse shadow impacts, as demonstrated in detail below. B. DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGY This analysis has been prepared in accordance with CEQR procedures and follows the guidelines of the 2014 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual. DEFINITIONS Incremental shadow is the additional, or new, shadow that a structure resulting from a project would cast on a sunlight-sensitive resource.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judicial Front in the War on Terror Transcript
    The Relationship Between Chemistry and Law Interviewer Okay, today is November the 18th. We are at West Point at the studio of the Center for Oral History with Judge Loretta Preska, the Chief Judge of the District Court for the Southern District of New York. Loretta Preska Exactly. Interviewer Could you spell your name for the transcriber? Just want to make sure we have it accurately. Loretta Preska Certainly. L-O-R-E-T-T-A, middle initial A, Preska, P-R-E-S-K-A. Interviewer Now is that a—what is the— Loretta Preska Lithuanian. Interviewer Lithuanian—wow. Shortened, or is that the way it was? Loretta Preska My father thinks that the S and the K were reversed, and it was Preksa. Interviewer Ah—very interesting. So, let’s begin by asking—I’ll ask just what we always do, where you come from and how you ended up in the law in this case. And then we’ll eventually get to discussing the subjects that have more direct relationship with West Point and the story of the soldier. Loretta Preska Certainly. I was born in Albany, New York, and grew up outside of Albany in Delmar. My father built our house on his family’s farm property. I went to schools in the area and attended the College of Saint Rose in Albany on a scholarship. I was a chemistry major at Saint Rose and very well served by it. In the summer before my senior year in college, I received a National Science Foundation grant to do what I thought I wanted to do, which was organic chemistry research.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Open Space
    East Midtown Rezoning and Related Actions FEIS 4. Open Space 4.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the potential effects on open space that could result from the Proposed Action. Open space is defined as publicly or privately owned land that is publicly accessible and operates, functions, or is available for leisure, play, or sport, or set aside for the protection and/or enhancement of the natural environment. Open space that is used for sports, exercise, or active play is classified as active, while open space that is used for relaxation, such as sitting or strolling, is classified as passive. According to the CEQR Technical Manual, an analysis of open space is conducted to determine whether a proposed action would have a direct impact resulting from the elimination or alteration of open space and/or an indirect impact resulting from overtaxing available open space. The Proposed Action would rezone an area encompassing approximately 70 blocks in the East Midtown area of Manhattan to establish the East Midtown Subdistrict within the Midtown Special District. Under the reasonable worst-case development scenario (RWCDS), the Proposed Action would result in approximately 10,340,972 gross square feet (gsf) of office floor area, 648,990 gsf of retail floor area, 2,134,234 gsf of hotel floor area, 207,029 gsf of residential floor area, as well as 140,200 gsf of parking floor area. Compared to the No-Action condition, the RWCDS would result in a net increase in the number of employees and a net decrease in the number of residents. Therefore, in accordance with CEQR guidelines, the open space analysis of the Proposed Action evaluated the change in non-residential population relative to the total amount of passive open space in the study area; while active open spaces were identified, these open spaces were not included in the analysis because non-residents, specifically workers, tend to use passive open spaces.
    [Show full text]