Sixth Annual Grotius Lecture: World on Fire Amy Chua

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sixth Annual Grotius Lecture: World on Fire Amy Chua American University International Law Review Volume 19 | Issue 6 Article 2 2004 Sixth Annual Grotius Lecture: World on Fire Amy Chua Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Chua, Amy. "Sixth Annual Grotius Lecture: World on Fire." American University International Law Review 19, no. 6 (2004): 1239-1253. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SIXTH ANNUAL GROTIUS LECTURE:* WORLD ON FIRE AMY CHUA** Many thanks to all of you for coming this evening. It's a great pleasure and honor for me to be giving the Grotius Lecture this year. I'm very grateful to Hannah Buxbaum, Charlotte Ku, and Anne- Marie Slaughter for inviting me. Many thanks also to Danny Brad- low and to the American University, Washington College of Law for co-sponsoring this event and to Upendra Baxi for commenting. My plan is to speak for about thirty minutes. I'll start by presenting the main thesis of my book, World on Fire,1 and I'll try to illustrate that thesis with examples from specific countries, from Indonesia to Bo- livia to Russia to Sierra Leone. I'll then shift my focus to the United States and how it fits into the picture. I'll conclude with some * Editor's Note: the following is a revised version of the Grotius Lecture presented at the American Society of International Law's ("ASIL") 98th Annual Meeting, which was held March 31-April 3, 2004. The Grotius Lecture Series is co- sponsored by the American University Washington College of Law, ASIL, and the International Legal Studies Program. The purpose of the Grotius Lecture Series is to open the ASIL forum to distinguished scholars for the purpose of discussing new and important topics in international law that might not otherwise be heard. It also provides a forum for participants to create an expanded space, giving them opportunities to explore the intellectual underpinnings of timely issues of interna- tional law. ** Amy Chua is currently a Professor of Law at Yale University. She lectures fre- quently on the effects of globalization to government, academic, business, and NGO groups. She has also lectured widely outside the United States, including in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, China, Mexico, Taiwan, Turkey, South Africa, and the UK. Her areas of teaching include contracts, law and development, international business transactions, and law and globalization. She holds both an A.B. and a J.D. from Harvard University. 1. AMY CHUA, WORLD ON FIRE: How EXPORTING FREE MARKET DEMOCRACY BREEDS ETHNIC HATRED AND GLOBAL INSTABILITY (2003) [hereinaf- ter WORLD ON FIRE]. 1239 1240 AM. U. INT'L L. REV. [19:1239 thoughts about policy implications for international institutions and international lawyers. Let me begin, then, by taking you back to 1989-the fall of the Berlin Wall, the death of communism. As I'm sure many of you re- member, a kind of consensus-a triumphal consensus--emerged at that time, not only in the United States, but to a considerable extent around the world. And that consensus was that markets and democ- racy, working hand-in-hand, would transform the world into a com- munity of modernized, productive, peace-loving nations.2 In the process, ethnic hatred, religious zealotry, and other "backward" as- pects of underdevelopment would be swept away.3 Unfortunately, if you look at the last fifteen years, something very different has happened. Since 1989, we have seen the proliferation of ethnic conflict, intensifying nationalism, fundamentalism, anti- Americanism, confiscations, expulsions, calls for re-nationalization, and two genocides of a magnitude unprecedented since the Nazi Holocaust. Why? What happened? Part of the answer lies in the relationship-and, increasingly, the explosive collision-among the three most powerful forces operating in the world today: markets, democracy, and ethnic hatred.4 The central thesis of my book is that, contrary to conventional wisdom, markets and democracy-at least in the form in which they're currently being promoted-may not be mutually-reinforcing in the developing world. On the contrary, in many non-Western countries, markets and democracy may be on a collision course. And the reason for this has to do with a phenomenon that is perva- sive outside the West, yet almost never acknowledged, indeed often viewed as taboo. This is the phenomenon of what I call market- 2. See id. at 20 (explaining the development of global organizations like the International Monetary Fund and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development for the purpose of "modernizing" and privatizing developing coun- tries). 3. But see id. at 21 (stating that global markets have generally accentuated the dominance of "outsider" minorities, and have fueled ethnic envy and hatred within impoverished majorities). 4. See id. at 16 (noting that the sobering lesson of globalization is that the combination of free markets and democracy has consistently acted as a catalyst for ethnic conflict). 2004] GROTIUS LECTURE 1241 dominant minorities ("MDMs"): ethnic minorities who, along with foreign investors, can be expected under market conditions to eco- nomically dominate the "indigenous" majorities around them, at least in the near to midterm future.5 Examples of MDMs include the Chinese throughout Southeast Asia6 (most recently, unknown to most Americans, ethnic Chinese have literally taken over the economies of Rangoon and Mandalay in Burma); Indians throughout East Africa and parts of the Caribbean; the Lebanese in West Africa and parts of the Caribbean; the Ibo in Nigeria; the Bamileke in Cameroon; Tutsi in Rwanda; Kikuyu in Kenya; whites in South Africa; whites in Zimbabwe; Croatians in the former Yugoslavia; Jews in post-Communist Russia; Tamils in Sri Lanka; and Bengalis in Assam-the list goes on, quite strikingly, as I try to document in my book. Before I go on, let me flag something that I hope is obvious to all of you from this list: groups can be mar- ket-dominant for very different reasons, ranging from "entrepreneu- rialism" and social networks to a history of apartheid or colonial op- pression. For example, if, as with whites in South Africa, a small minority uses force to relegate the majority to inferior education and inhumane conditions for over a century-that minority is likely to be a MDM.7 And this has nothing necessarily to do with "culture." On the other hand, to be clear, by market dominance, I'm not just talking about vague ethnic stereotypes, but rather about starkly- disproportionatecontrol of major sectors of the economy. So, in the Philippines, where my own family is from, the Chinese make up only one percent of the population, but control as much as sixty percent of the private economy, including all the major airlines and virtually all the major banks and businesses.8 Similarly, whites in South Africa currently make up roughly fourteen percent of the population, but 5. See id. at 6 (labeling market-dominant minorities "the Achilles' heel of free market democracy"). 6. See WORLD ON FIRE, supra note 1, at 23-34 (documenting how, unknown to most Americans, ethnic Chinese have taken over the economies of Rangoon and Mandalay in Burma). 7. See id. at 97-100 (contrasting the disproportionate amount of wealth con- trolled by South African whites, which is attributable to the "head start" given by the whites' forbearers, who destroyed blacks' human capital). 8. See id. at 36-37 (describing the obvious presence of the Chinese in the Phil- ippine economy, such as in the Chinese-controlled Manila Stock Exchange). 1242 AM. U. INT'L L. RE V. [19:1239 still own more than eighty-five percent of the arable land and, at least until very recently, owned all of South Africa's largest conglomer- ates.9 Less well-known, but very typical of many Latin American countries, in Guatemala, a tiny minority of light-skinned elites con- trol almost all of the nation's wealth, while the Mayan Indians, nearly seventy percent of the population, live in abject and often illit- erate poverty.10 Similarly, I recently spent some time in Bolivia. At one point, I was having dinner with a wealthy businessman who was actually the brother of the president of the country at the time. He said to me (and I quote): "[t]his is a country where three percent of us run every- thing-politics, culture, the economy-and sixty-five percent of the population have no future."" That was just a few years ago, and I'll say more in a second about what has happened in Bolivia since. But it's very striking, although a majority or near-majority of the popula- tion in Bolivia are Amerindian (principally Aymara and Quechua In- dians), that the president was white, spent much of his life in Con- necticut, was educated at the University of Chicago, and speaks Spanish with an English accent! The phenomenon of MDMs has a number of sobering implications for international policy and international lawyers. Most crucially, in developing countries with a MDM, markets and democracy will tend to favor not only just different people, or differing classes, but differ- ent ethnic groups. Markets magnify the often astounding wealth of the market-dominant minority while democracy increases the politi- cal power of the impoverished indigenous majority. In such circum- stances, where the rich aren't just rich, but also belong to a resented "outsider" ethnic group, the pursuit of free market democracy often 9.
Recommended publications
  • World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability
    World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability Professor Amy Chua, Yale Law School New York, N.Y.: Anchor Books, 2004 This book is about a phenomenon—pervasive outside the West yet rarely acknowledged, indeed often viewed as taboo—that turns free market democracy into an engine of ethnic conflagration. The phenomenon I refer to is that of market-dominant minorities: ethnic minorities who, for widely varying reasons, tend under market conditions to dominate economically, often to a startling extent, the “indigenous” majorities around them. Market-dominant minorities can be found in every corner of the world. The Chinese are a market-dominant minority not just in the Philippines but throughout Southeast Asia. In 1998, Chinese Indonesians, only 3 percent of the population, controlled roughly 70 percent of Indonesia’s private economy, including all of the country’s largest conglomerates. More recently, in Burma, entrepreneurial Chinese have literally taken over the economies of Mandalay and Rangoon. Whites are a market- dominant minority in South Africa—and, in a more complicated sense, in Brazil, Ecuador, Guatemala, and much of Latin America. Lebanese are a market-dominant minority in West Africa. Ibo are a market-dominant minority in Nigeria. Croats were a market-dominant minority in the former Yugoslavia. And Jews are almost certainly a market-dominant minority in post-Communist Russia. Market-dominant minorities are the Achilles’ heel of free market democracy. In societies with a market-dominant ethnic minority, markets and democracy favor not just different people, or different classes, but different ethnic groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Dong 1 Asian Refugees: the Case of China, Vietnam, North Korea, And
    Dong 1 Asian Refugees: The Case of China, Vietnam, North Korea, and the International Community By: Leslie J. Dong Dept. of International Affairs, University of Colorado at Boulder Defended April 6, 2015 Thesis Advisors: Dr. William Wei, Dept. of History Dr. Tim Weston, Dept. of History Dr. Vicki Hunter, Dept. of International Affairs Dong 2 ABSTRACT Leslie Dong: Asian Refugees Under the Direction of William Wei The world is plagued by the largest refugee crisis since World War II. At this given time, there are more than 51 million displaced people around the world and nearly 35% of them originate from and remain in Asia. Due to the absence of developed regional institutions, refugee crises remain largely a state-to-state issue in Asia, making China (P.R.C.) a key player in addressing these crises. China's geographic location and its robust economic growth has not only made it an ideal haven for refugees, China's growing influence in Asia has also given it an unprecedented opportunity to establish itself as a leader in humanitarian crises. Because of the immense impact that China's refugee policies have on the surrounding region, this study seeks to examine how China formulates its refugee policies and why it adopts certain policies over others in different situations. By examining the driving factors for China's starkly different response to the Vietnamese refugee crisis (1978-1979) and the North Korean refugee crisis (since the 1990s), this study sheds light on China's policy considerations and its implications for the rest of Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixth Annual Grotius Lecture: World on Fire
    THE SIXTH ANNUAL GROTIUS LECTURE:* WORLD ON FIRE AMY CHUA** Many thanks to all of you for coming this evening. It's a great pleasure and honor for me to be giving the Grotius Lecture this year. I'm very grateful to Hannah Buxbaum, Charlotte Ku, and Anne- Marie Slaughter for inviting me. Many thanks also to Danny Brad- low and to the American University, Washington College of Law for co-sponsoring this event and to Upendra Baxi for commenting. My plan is to speak for about thirty minutes. I'll start by presenting the main thesis of my book, World on Fire,1 and I'll try to illustrate that thesis with examples from specific countries, from Indonesia to Bo- livia to Russia to Sierra Leone. I'll then shift my focus to the United States and how it fits into the picture. I'll conclude with some * Editor's Note: the following is a revised version of the Grotius Lecture presented at the American Society of International Law's ("ASIL") 98th Annual Meeting, which was held March 31-April 3, 2004. The Grotius Lecture Series is co- sponsored by the American University Washington College of Law, ASIL, and the International Legal Studies Program. The purpose of the Grotius Lecture Series is to open the ASIL forum to distinguished scholars for the purpose of discussing new and important topics in international law that might not otherwise be heard. It also provides a forum for participants to create an expanded space, giving them opportunities to explore the intellectual underpinnings of timely issues of interna- tional law.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy, Markets, and Doomsaying: Is Ethnic Conflict Inevitable? (Reviewing Amy Chua, World on Fire : How Exporting Free Marke
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2004 Democracy, Markets, and Doomsaying: Is Ethnic Conflict Inevitable? (reviewing Amy Chua, World on Fire : How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability (2003)) Tom Ginsburg Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Tom Ginsburg, "Democracy, Markets, and Doomsaying: Is Ethnic Conflict Inevitable? (reviewing Amy Chua, World on Fire : How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability (2003))," 22 Berkeley Journal of International Law 310 ( This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEW Democracy, Markets and Doomsaying: Is Ethnic Conflict Inevitable? AMY CHUA, WORLD ON FIRE: How EXPORTING FREE MARKET DEMOCRACY BREEDS ETHNIC HATRED AND GLOBAL INSTABILITY (NEw YORK: DOUBLEDAY, 2003, PP 340, $26.00 CLOTH). By Tom Ginsburg* INTRODUCTION The field of law and development studies has come up with few big ideas. Born out of 1960s optimism about the possibilities of law influencing social change, the early law and development movement sought to export American ideas, institutions, and educational methods to developing societies. But law and development soon turned inward in frustration at the slow pace of change and the resistance of elites in the developing world. Perhaps the most cited article demonstrating the dissatisfaction and disappointment in the field is one by Trubek and Galanter, which examines a litany of failed assumptions and unmet promise.1 Yet the effort to export American institutions did not end with the demise of the first law and development movement.
    [Show full text]
  • After March 14 Tibet Riots: a New Wave of Chinese Nationalism A
    After March 14 Tibet Riots: A New Wave of Chinese Nationalism A thesis presented to the faculty of the Center for International Studies of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Yang Lai June 2010 © 2010 Yang Lai. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled After March 14 Tibet Riots: A New Wave of Chinese Nationalism by YANG LAI has been approved for the Center for International Studies by Jie-Li Li Associate Professor of Sociology and Anthropology Thomas A. Smucker Director, International Development Studies Daniel Weiner Executive Director, Center for International Studies 3 ABSTRACT LAI, YANG, M.A., June 2010, International Development Studies After March 14 Tibet Riots: A New Wave of Chinese Nationalism (87 pp.) Director of Thesis: Jie-Li Li The thesis is a case study of the Chinese nationalist movements after the Tibet riots in 2008. It is a qualitative research study. I use critical theory to analyze the stimulus of the movement, the new characteristics of the movement, as well as its impact to the country and international society. My study indicates that narrative bias in China and the West has been the main obstacle for dialogue between China and the West, as well as China and Tibet. Hence, more communicative actions are necessary for conciliation. Approved: _____________________________________________________________ Jie-Li Li Associate Professor of Sociology and Anthropology 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Identity Politics and the Paradox of Sinification
    ISSUE: 2016 NO. 12 ISSN 2335-6677 RESEARCHERS AT ISEAS – YUSOF ISHAK INSTITUTE SHARE THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF CURRENT EVENTS Singapore | 17 March 2016 Ethnic Chinese in Contemporary Indonesia: Changing Identity Politics and the Paradox of Sinification Charlotte Setijadi* EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Almost two decades after post-Suharto reforms began, Chinese Indonesians no longer face the forced assimilation and legislative discrimination they endured under Suharto’s New Order regime. Since 1998, Chinese Indonesian identity politics and culture have flourished, and Chinese organizations, media and Mandarin language education are once again back in the public domain. Scholars term the phenomenon ‘(re)Sinification’ or a ‘return’ to Chinese culture. Politically, Chinese Indonesians now have greater representation and participation than ever before. However, far from being ‘unified,’ their political views and aspirations are extremely diverse. In recent years, motivated by the economic lure of a rising China, closer bilateral ties between China and Indonesia, and a sentimental desire for a return to Chinese modes of identification, many Chinese Indonesians, especially those from the totok (generally understood as ‘unacculturated’ or ‘purer’ Chinese, usually able to speak Mandarin) business community have culturally and linguistically reoriented themselves towards Mainland China, as well as forged closer commercial ties with PRC government and businesses. Within the new climate of Sino-Indonesian cooperation, Chinese Indonesians can potentially play an important cultural and commercial ‘bridging’ role. 1 ISSUE: 2016 NO. 12 ISSN 2335-6677 Nevertheless, considering the violent history of racism against Chinese Indonesians, as well as undercurrents of anti-PRC sentiments in Indonesia, more critical questions need to be asked about the potential dangers of ‘Sinification’ for Indonesia’s ethnic Chinese.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria and the Horror of Boko Haram
    Nigeria and the Horror of Boko Haram http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/studio/multimedia/20150303/in... Nigeria and the Horror of Boko Haram Public Affairs John Campbell, Joanne J. Myers Transcript Introduction JOANNE MYERS: Good morning. I'm Joanne Myers, Director of Public Affairs Programs, and on behalf of the Carnegie Council I would like to welcome you all here this morning. Today, as part of our ongoing series, World on Fire: Security Challenges in the Early 21st Century, we will be focusing our attention on one of the world's most violent terrorist groups, Boko Haram, based in northeast Nigeria. These Islamic extremists are one more example of how some individuals are harnessing the moral authority of religion for their own political purposes. Our speaker is John Campbell, former U.S. ambassador to Nigeria and currently Ralph Bunch senior fellow for Africa policy studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. We are very pleased to welcome him here to this breakfast program. For several years now, Boko Haram, an unrestrained Sunni Muslim sect, have committed brutal murders and burned villages, and have been responsible for suicide attacks and numerous kidnappings, in addition to the notorious 200 schoolgirls taken last April. All these reprehensible acts have been committed in their quest to abolish a secular system of government and establish an Islamic state and sharia law in Nigeria. With each attack, these savages become bolder, and it has become quite evident that their ambitions are not contained by national boundaries. They have extended their military campaigns into neighboring Cameroon, Chad, and Niger.
    [Show full text]
  • Set the World on Fire
    SET THE WORLD ON FIRE ................. 19052$ $$FM 06-23-17 13:30:16 PS PAGE i POLITICS AND CULTURE IN MODERN AMERICA Series Editors: Margot Canaday, Glenda Gilmore, Michael Kazin, Stephen Pitti, Thomas J. Sugrue Volumes in the series narrate and analyze political and social change in the broadest dimensions from 1865 to the present, including ideas about the ways people have sought and wielded power in the public sphere and the language and institutions of politics at all levels—local, national, and transnational. The series is motivated by a desire to reverse the fragmentation of modern U.S. history and to encourage synthetic perspectives on social movements and the state, on gender, race, and labor, and on intellectual history and popular culture. ................. 19052$ $$FM 06-23-17 13:30:17 PS PAGE ii SET THE WORLD ON FIRE • Black Nationalist Women and the Global Struggle for Freedom KEISHA N. BLAIN UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PRESS PHILADELPHIA ................. 19052$ $$FM 06-23-17 13:30:17 PS PAGE iii Copyright ᭧ 2018 University of Pennsylvania Press All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of review or scholarly citation, none of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher. Published by University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112 www.upenn.edu/pennpress Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 24681097531 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISBN 978-0-8122-4988-0 ................. 19052$ $$FM 06-23-17 13:30:18 PS PAGE iv Introduction We want to set the world on fire, we want freedom and justice and a chance to build for ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnic Question in Law and Development
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2004 The thnicE Question in Law and Development Lan Cao Repository Citation Cao, Lan, "The thnicE Question in Law and Development" (2004). Faculty Publications. 16. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/16 Copyright c 2004 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs THE ETHNIC QUESTION IN LAW AND DEVELOPMENT Lan Cao* WORLD ON FIRE: HOW EXPORTING FREE MARKET DEMOCRACY BREEDS ETHNIC HATRED AND GLOBAL INSTABILITY. By Amy Chua. New York: Doubleday. 2003. Pp. ix, 340. $26. World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability, by Professor Amy Chua,! is an analytically complex narrative of contemporary ethnic violence in the current era of globalization. Although such violence has historical roots, according to Chua it has also been fueled by free-market forces and democratization. The book is a forceful and provocative indictment of the current U.S. policy of promoting and exporting markets and democracy to developing and formerly communist, market-transitional countries. In her book, Professor Chua applies her thesis - that ethnicity, global capitalism, and democracy are a volatile mix - to countries such as Rwanda and Sierra Leone, Indonesia and Malaysia, Russia and Zimbabwe, Venezuela and the former Yugoslavia. As different as those countries are, they share a defining characteristic: the presence of what she calls "market dominant minorities" among the majority population - that is, minorities, such as the ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia, Indians and Lebanese in Africa, Jews in post-Soviet Russia, the ethnic Kikuyu in Kenya, whose spectacular wealth and "control" of the economy arouse deep resentment in the impoverished majority.
    [Show full text]
  • A Book Review of Amy Chua's World on Fire
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title Fire Prevention: A Book Review of Amy Chua's World on Fire Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tn5x9nz Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 23(1) Author Goldenziel, Jill Publication Date 2005 DOI 10.5070/P8231022178 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California FIRE PREVENTION: A BOOK REVIEW OF AMY CHUA'S WORLD ON FIRE1 Jill Goldenziel2 In this article, Ms. Goldenziel argues that World on Fire presents a compelling descriptive argument that would thwart the development of effective foreign policy. By failing to define the central terms of her thesis, Professor Chua oversimplifies the complex and unique historical, sociological, and political circumstances of the countries she studies. Ms. Goldenziel ex- plains how more precise definitions are crucial to the creation of functional democratic processes, and presents a rubric for systematizing factors that affect democratization. I. INTRODUCTION Professor Amy Chua's World on Fire presents a compelling descriptive argument with problematic prescriptive implications. Chua posits a causal relationship between the opening of free markets, democratic reforms, and anti-ethnic backlash in devel- oping nations. Her persuasive analysis, global in scope, begins to untangle the processes that influence ethnic backlash in the de- veloping world. Yet by failing to precisely define the central terms of her book, Chua cannot provide a basis for developing effective policies. Chua ignores important qualitative factors that define the groups she labels "market-dominant minorities" and that differentiate the types of free market processes that affect the developing world. Chua's greatest oversight, however, lies in her failure to distinguish between the variety of democratic re- forms that have exacerbated and assuaged ethnic tensions in the developing world.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigerian Lives Matter!: Language and Why Black Performance Matters
    Article Black Lives Matter! Nigerian Lives Matter!: Language and Why Black Performance Matters Abimbola A. Adelakun African and African Diaspora Studies, University of Texas at Austin, 210 W. 24th Street, Mailcode E3400, Austin, TX 78712, USA; [email protected] Received: 23 March 2019; Accepted: 9 April 2019; Published: 14 April 2019 Abstract: This essay explores performance as a language by looking at its appropriation by other cultures, and the associated history of the crafted phrases that are borrowed along. I start by noting that to create awareness of the massacres that have recently occurred in some parts of Nigeria, commentators, both in and out of the country, and activist-cum-protesters created the term “Nigerian Lives Matter.” They appropriated from “Black Lives Matter,” the American-originated advocacy movement that campaigns against violence and brutality against black people. I show that these forms of lexical interchange are possible because of non-Americans’ familiarity with America’s racial history, and black performance liberation expressivity, which they have been acculturated into as a result of their long exposure to American culture. Beyond phrases however, I argue that black performance itself is a language that has a global resonance among minorities. To illustrate this further, I do a close reading of This is Nigeria, a recent music video released by Nigerian lawyer turned artist, Folarin Falana (Falz), alongside a version of the original production, This is America, also recently released by Donald Glover (Childish Gambino). Both songs continue in the older tradition of African and African American transatlantic political relations through music, the shared understanding of the similarities of anti-black oppression, and the formation of aesthetics that mediate the advocacy of black liberation.
    [Show full text]
  • Recalibrating the War on Terror by Enhancing Development Practices in the Middle East
    02__FANDL.DOC 8/1/2006 3:00 PM RECALIBRATING THE WAR ON TERROR BY ENHANCING DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES IN THE MIDDLE EAST KEVIN J. FANDL* INTRODUCTION Terrorism has existed in various forms for hundreds of years. Only recently, with the attacks on the United States, Spain, and the United Kingdom, has the awareness of terrorism in the Western world intensified. While attacks considered terrorist-based occur on a surprisingly frequent basis, these three attacks stand out prominently as the starting point for a new era in global relations. Terrorist attacks are detrimental to the political, financial and social economy, both locally and globally. Such attacks force a greater percentage of public funds to be diverted to national defense. Accordingly, those funds cannot be used to directly benefit the economies of the world. Identifying methods to secure a reduction in the frequency of terrorist attacks is, therefore, in the best interests of all States that benefit from the global economy. The United States was attacked in 2001 by a group of terrorists hailing largely from Saudi Arabia.1 The alleged mastermind behind the attack, Osama bin Laden, was said to be stationed in Afghanistan shortly thereafter.2 In retaliation for the attack, the United States sought to strengthen United Nations Security Council sanctions Copyright © 2006 by Kevin J. Fandl. * Attorney; admitted to practice in New York and Massachusetts; Doctoral candidate in Public Policy at George Mason University; J.D., American University Washington College of Law; M.A., American University School of International Service; B.A., Lock Haven University; Fulbright Scholar. I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]