arXiv:2103.05699v1 [physics.hist-ph] 9 Mar 2021 a ia ro tptwr h umnto fteMan- the of culmination the toward step proof vital a was rhrCmtn ae oat oetOppenheimer, Robert Conant, James Compton, Arthur rjc]sol o ecniee ipyi em fmil- of terms in simply considered be not should Project] uy1,14,na lmgro e eio Trinity Mexico. New Alamogordo, near 1945, 16, July srto NS)dgiais itrcldocumentaries, historical dignitaries, Admin- (NNSA) Depart- Security istration Nuclear by New National (DOE) Laboratory to Energy of visit National ment a Alamos including 2020, Los in Mexico’s events recog- many were by countries) Germany, nized other in and originating France, (some Italy, Canada Hungary, and UK, from US, engineers the and technical scientists The by II. War made World accomplishments of end the and Project hattan t xeiet h ol’ rtncerepoin on explosion, nuclear first world’s the experiment, ity n h ulcto fa xeln book, excellent an of publication the and itFakClose. Frank cist eayo a ar .Sisnsoetepecet(if prescient the spoke words: Stimson grandiose) L. Sec- somewhat Harry attendance, War in of Lawrence retary Ernest and Fermi, Enrico Groves, Leslie Gen. Marshall, George Gen. Bush, nebar and York, New Fe. Chicago, Santa Amsterdam, re- Francisco, with San culture in opera Adams’s high John into of performances entered cent even surround- have events Trinity The Section.” ing is “Trinity (ANS) the Society as to Nuclear referred American Mex- the New of indeed, chapter clear; science ico’s is nuclear community broad engineering the and for accomplishment dational l omk ta suac fftr ec ahrthan rather peace future possi- of if civilization” assurance controlled to an be menace it must make the It to beyond war. ble far present went the realize project of to the needs important of was been implications it had the war, date of that to needs field the the in by lives advances fostered the the on While effect its men. gravity, in of these of than laws important the more of far and but the theory Copernican to the discov- man of the of to eries compared relationship be might new discovery This a universe. as but weapons, itary ahta rjc ula cec ehooyDevelopmen Technology & Science Nuclear Project Manhattan h er22 akdte7t niesr fteTrin- the of anniversary 75th the marked 2020 year The tahg-oee etn nMy14,wt Van- with 1945, May in meeting high-powered a At * orsodn uhr [email protected] author: corresponding 3 h motneo rnt safoun- a as Trinity of importance The . 4 Ti rjc [Manhattan project “This Trinity, otrAtomic Doctor o lmsNtoa Laboratory National Alamos Los o lms M87545 NM Alamos, Los yphysi- by akB Chadwick B. Mark Foreword: 1 , 2 umte oASN 22) L-R2-10 DRAFT ’LA-UR-21-21605 (2021). ANS/NT to Submitted 9314.Bt ehia aesadtcnclhistory technical and papers technical Both 1943–1945. fewr,Icalne u tf owieu hi work their up write to staff our challenged I Afterward, laboratories. national DOE US today’s become would h ahta rjc,tgte ihteMTRadiation MIT the with together Project, Manhattan The Oppen- by part large in facilitated was effort historic The was excellence technical and scientific of gathering This stcnclppr ob ulse na nenlLos internal an in published be to 2020. papers of technical summer the as in Alamos Los at hosted I that ries has audiences. which broader of to available much been not archives, Security (NSRC) National Center Alamos Los Research to our access in authors’ material the extensive tech- from benefit nuclear today’s papers the These and for energy nology. foundational nuclear proven of has sci- use ago how peaceful years illustrate 75 and from research, ence underlying the a of fascinating misunder- illuminate pects nature literature, previous the open the correct clarify in to made, standings is breakthroughs goal the Their of included. are papers Y), Project called (then Alamos the Los at during Project made Manhattan breakthroughs engineering and science of sue of discovery the and waves. physics, genome, gravitational particle human of the field of for the sequencing effective in so community proved scientific since has the that model solve to a together problems, researchers of sci thousands big bringing of ence, beginnings the represents research, Lawrence’s accelerator E.O. and radar on work wartime Laboratory’s leadership. unproven) time, the at (and, superb heimer’s what of creation the to led and and hydrodynamics computations, in in neutronics and creativity sciences scientific material effort of and collective outpouring nuclear their remarkable and a history, to our led in event bomb. unique atomic a workable a develop wartime frenetic successfully a to at pace worked and pressure country intense the under across locations together Project Manhattan came various students, at graduate best their with together h dao hsseilisege u fasmnrse- seminar a of out grew issue special this of idea The is- special this anniversary, Trinity the recognize To luminaries, engineering and science universities’ Our * ula Technology Nuclear oue napcso the of aspects on focuses sa o Alamos Los at ts s- - Submitted to ANS/NT (2021). LA-UR-21-21605 DRAFT

Alamos classified research journal. The invitation was cal measurements from which bare critical masses could extended to colleagues at the Lawrence Livermore Na- be estimated with extrapolative calculations. Sood et al.8 tional Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, and the describe the evolution of neutronics calculational capabil- Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) at Aldermaston ities from early neutron diffusion work to subsequent re- in the UK (appropriate given the large British contribu- finements by Serber and Wilson (a British researcher) and tion to the Manhattan Project). The authors overcame the postwar innovations of Sn deterministic and Monte substantial challenges in completing the papers during Carlo neutron-transport simulations. the COVID-19 pandemic, not least of which was the Andrews, Andrews, and Mason9 describe the Canadian limited access to our onsite archives. Despite this, our work at the Montreal Laboratory and Chalk River and the project led to the fascinating suite of papers presented essential role Canada played in supplying nuclear mate- here. Subsequent discussions with the American Nuclear rials for the Manhattan Project. The authors also tell of Society resulted in the decision to make this scholarship the contributions of the talented Canadians who came to available to a broader readership by publishing the unclas- work on the Manhattan Project in the US. The Montreal sified papers in this special issue of Nuclear Technology Laboratory’s work was focused on neutronic criticality with open access. theory and heavy-water-moderated reactor experimenta- Below, I summarize some of the key insights to be tion––research that proved to be important for postwar found in this collection of papers. CANDU reactor development. Nuclear science and technology. Ref.5 documents Hydrodynamics. Morgan and Archer10 describe the neutron cross sections measured with increasing ac- Los Alamos’ Theoretical Division’s Lagrangian hydrody- curacy during the Manhattan Project. Accurate neutron namic shock calculations, implemented on IBM punched- cross sections were needed to determine critical masses card machines. Their paper presents the algorithmic ad- and, therefore, the quantities of 235U and 239Pu required vances made during the Manhattan Project by von Neu- from Oak Ridge and Hanford. In short order, four uni- mann that led to the late-1940s formulation of computa- versity accelerators were disassembled and reassembled tional fluid dynamics by von Neumann and Richtmyer at Los Alamos, and methods were established to make that is today the basis of simulations of everything from measurements on extremely small samples owing to the climate change to nuclear reactor design. But Morgan initial lack of availability of enriched 235U and plutonium. and Archer also illuminate the less appreciated, but very In just two years, advances in experimental methods led influential, roles of Peierls and Skyrme. The authors to measured nuclear data that are surprisingly close to show that the first usage of “artificial viscosity,” a con- today’s best values in our Evaluated Nuclear Data Files cept central to computational hydrodynamics, appears to (ENDF). Many of the key original papers and numerical originate with Peierls in 1944. Skyrme is well known to values have now been archived through a collaboration nuclear and particle physicists, but few know of his shock- with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) physics research. Indeed, it was the expertise in shock and Brookhaven National Laboratory in the internation- physics that was especially sought after by Oppenheimer ally available Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data (EX- and Bethe in the British Mission that brought two dozen FOR) database. Also, an early, little-known British pa- British scientists to New Mexico in 1944. Other papers per is transcribed5 : Bretscher’s 1940 description of the describe the history of the Los Alamos computing facil- usefulness of plutonium, written around the time that the ity, focusing first on the “human computers” (Lewis11) element was discovered. and then the IBM punched-card computations (Archer12) Papers on the first fast critical assemblies (Hutchinson needed for hydrodynamics and neutronics. et al.6) and pulsed and solution assembly experiments High explosives. The implosion design of the Fat (Kimpland et al.7) provide details about how critical Man atomic bomb relied on precision-engineered high masses were determined and how they influenced subse- explosives (HE) to symmetrically compress a solid ball quent research across the world on nuclear criticality and of plutonium. Brown and Borovina13 describe this HE criticality safety. The Los Alamos “water boiler” assem- work, its subsequent impact on broader shaped-charge bly was the world’s third reactor to become operational technology, and its use in mining, oil recovery, and even (in 1944, after Chicago’s CP-1 and Oak Ridge’s X-10 SpaceX multistage rocket separation. AWE’s Moore14 piles), the first to use a solution, and the first to use en- describes pioneering British work on explosive shaped riched uranium fuel. During the Manhattan Project, bare charges that influenced von Neumann, Neddermeyer, and critical masses were not measured directly—there was Tuck’s HE lens design. Indeed, it was new to me that insufficient time or material; instead, the wartime mea- both types of explosives used in the Trinity explosive lens surements focused on reflected assemblies and subcriti- system––“Comp B” (a mixture of RDX and TNT) and Submitted to ANS/NT (2021). LA-UR-21-21605 DRAFT

Baratol––had their origins in earlier British defense re- inally expected––the Fat Man “gadget” overperformed. search on HE formulation. Morgan’s paper15 describes Now, Selby et al.’s paper21 shares our latest assessment the Jumbo steel vessel designed, if the Trinity test should that Trinity’s yield was higher still, 24.8±2kt. The new have failed, to contain the Trinity gadget and conven- value comes from advances in precision mass spectrom- tional explosion and allow recovery of the precious plu- etry and related calculational methods that allow us to tonium. In the end, Jumbo was not used for Trinity, but reanalyze the 75-year-old debris, measuring the stable nu- the experience gained was valuable for later containment- clides into which the original radionuclides have decayed. vessel work and reactor engineering. Other papers examine early prompt assessments of Trin- 22 Plutonium materials & metallurgy. Martz, Freib- ity’s yield: Katz seeks to understand how Fermi might ert, and Clark16 trace the exciting process through which have determined the yield when he observed the blast the new element plutonium was discovered in 1940 at wave’s impact on small pieces of falling paper; Baty and 23 University of California–Berkeley. The first plutonium Ramsey revisit G. I. Taylor’s determination of the yield was characterized there and at the Chicago’s Metallurgi- from the growth of the fireball. Using Lie group symme- cal Laboratory, before US research efforts were consoli- try techniques, they rederive Taylor’s two-fifths law relat- dated at Los Alamos in 1943. Particularly interesting is ing a blast wave’s position, time, and explosive energy. the early confusion caused by the widely varying density During the Manhattan Project, Bethe and Feynman de- measurements and the subsequent discovery of the many veloped an analytic formula to predict the yield of a fis- complex phases of plutonium. This work collects the his- sion explosion from some elegant considerations. This torical records and reconstructs the history of the rapidly work has had an enduring influence over the past 75 advancing field of plutonium metallurgy and chemistry. years; our classified research journal on Trinity has no The authors show that the idea of using gallium as an fewer than five papers on different aspects of the for- alloying agent to stabilize the malleable δ-phase of pluto- mula––three from Los Alamos, one from Livermore, and nium was first raised only a few months before the Trinity one from AWE. A short paper by Lestone and Rosen (Liv- test, a reflection of the intense pace of the project. They ermore)24 describes, for the first time, the formula and also describe postwar work on the world’s first fast reac- its relationship to earlier wartime British work by Frisch tor, Clementine, which operated in a canyon, no less, at and Peierls and by Pryce and Dirac. (Wigner, who was Los Alamos. Another paper by Crockett and Freibert17 Dirac’s brother-in-law, said that “Feynman is a second describes the rapid wartime expansion of experimental Dirac, only this time human”25!). and theoretical work on the equation of state (EOS). They Technical history. This special issue includes a num- describe the foundational EOS research needed to under- ber of technical history papers, including those men- stand the hydrodynamic behavior of plutonium, uranium, tioned above on the beginnings of computing. Another26 and other materials. Los Alamos remains the DOE’s discusses the origins of the nuclear-core design for the center of excellence for plutonium research, signified in Trinity implosion and presents details of the invention a joint effort with the NNSA and AWE by the seven- patent by Christy and Peierls that is held in our NSRC 18 volume Plutonium Handbook, published by the ANS in archives, resolving longstanding disputes regarding who 2019. The wartime plutonium work, unlike the other ar- originated the idea (it was Christy). Moore gives27 an eas described above, did not benefit from earlier British introduction to Peierls’ fascinating 1945 summary of the ... research, except Los Alamos’s leading metallurgist, British contributions to the “Tube Alloys” project, the co- Cyril Stanley Smith, was a naturalized US citizen who dename for the British work before it transferred to Los had emigrated from England! Alamos in 1943–1944. The author provides Peierls’ sum- Nuclear energy and yield. Hanson and Oldham19 mary in full––with Sir James Chadwick’s marginal notes. review the foundational radiochemistry methods devel- Moore’s useful introduction and footnotes shine light on oped to measure the yield of Trinity and how the tech- the activities of the time and the progress by the British re- niques evolved in subsequent years. Mercer et al.20 de- searchers toward establishing the feasibility of an atomic scribe recent measurements of radionuclides in trinitite bomb. rock from Alamogordo. Their paper describes both tra- Trinity and its impacts. I will end where we will ditional radiation-detection methods that are used in the begin. The first paper in our special issue is by Carr,28 training of IAEA inspectors at Los Alamos as well as the our Laboratory historian. He gives an overview of the novel decay energy spectroscopy method. Trinity test and its impact, explains why Oppenheimer In the years following the war, a yield of 21 kilotons chose the name, and provides additional context for the (kt) for Trinity was announced by the DOE. This was papers that follow. Carr also includes information from higher than many of the Los Alamos scientists had orig- our NSRC archives related to the effects of the fallout Submitted to ANS/NT (2021). LA-UR-21-21605 DRAFT

from the test; also see the useful 2020 special issue in 1. J. SARRAOETAL., “The Science of Trinity,” YouTube Health Physics29 published by the National Cancer Insti- https://youtu.be/iBwKCxoeiW4 (2020). tute (NCI). The NCI study was mandated by Congress 2.A. B. CARRETAL., “Trinity and and took seven years to complete, producing six impres- the British Mission movie,” YouTube sive peer-reviewed articles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DyWmovR5EY (2020). Our goal for this collection of papers is that they re- flect Robert Wilson’s 1947 words in Los Alamos report 3. F. CLOSE, Trinity. The Treachery and Pursuit of the Most LA-1009: “The work reported was for a specific military Dangerous Spy in History, Allen Lane, Penguin Random purpose. It will be gratifying to all those who partici- House, Milton Keynes, UK (2019). pated in the work when it takes its more proper place as 4.H. L. STIMSON, “Notes of the Interim Com- a contribution to the general structure of scientific knowl- mittee Meeting, Thursday, 31 May 1945.” see edge.” I can speak for all the authors when I say that we https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB162/12.pdf (The Interim Committee was chartered on May 4, 1945, by had fun writing these papers and that we learned many President Truman after he learned of the Manhattan Project new things in the process, and I trust that this collection following Roosevelt’s death, to advise the government on is indeed a contribution to both the history of science future directions and controls of nuclear technology). and to the advancement of science. It is clear how in- 5. M. B.CHADWICK, “Nuclear Science Advances the Man- novations in nuclear science and technology continue to hattan Project & Comparison to Today’s ENDF Under- benefit from cross-fertilization between national security- standing,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021). driven and civilian programs. Furthermore, it is evident 6. J. HUTCHINSONETAL., “Criticality Experiments with that foreign-born scientists have contributed substantially Fast 25 and 49 Metal and Hydride Systems During the Man- to US research advances. hattan Project,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021). Acknowledgments. I would like to acknowledge 7. R. KIMPLAND, T. GROVEETAL., “Critical Assemblies: staff who played an exceptional role in writing numer- Dragon Burst Assembly & Solution Assemblies,” Nuclear ous articles and in providing extensive valuable “inter- Technology, this issue (2021). nal” review feedback to our authors: Bill Archer and 8. A. SOOD,A.FORSTER,R.C.LITTLE, and B. J. Craig Carmer (Los Alamos); Mordy Rosen (Livermore); ARCHER, “The History of Modern Monte Carlo for Neu- Richard Moore and Peter Adsley (AWE); and Jonathan tronics,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021). Katz (Washington University and Los Alamos). Further- 9. S. A. ANDREWS, M. T. ANDREWS, and T. E. MA- more, Critical Assembly, the excellent book on the Man- SON, “Canadian Contributions to the Manhattan Project hattan Project, written by Los Alamos historians in the and Early Nuclear Research,” Nuclear Technology, this is- early 1990s,30 provided an important foundation for our sue (2021). research, and usefully identifies primary source archival 10. N. R. MORGAN and B. J. ARCHER, “On the Origins of material held in our National Security Research Center Lagrangian Hydrodynamic Methods,” Nuclear Technology, (NSRC). I am also grateful to Tom Kunkle who provided this issue (2021). pointers to many valuable historical documents for our 11. N. LEWIS, “Trinity by the Numbers: The Computing Ef- project. A paper that Kunkle is presently writing de- fort that Made Trinity Possible,” Nuclear Technology, this scribes the German origins of implosion concepts, start- issue (2021). ing around 1940 and including the role of Guderley’s 12. B.J.ARCHER, “The Los Alamos Computing Facility Dur- 1942 hydrodynamics paper. Kunkle addresses the ex- ing the Manhattan Project,” Nuclear Technology, this issue tent to which it was known or commissioned by Schu- (2021). mann for wartime German atomic energy research, and 13. E. N. BROWN and D. L. BOROVINA, “The Trinity High indeed whether any of this was known by US Manhattan Explosive Implosion System: The Foundation for Preci- Project researchers at the time as Lowell Wood has sug- sion Explosive Applications,” Nuclear Technology, this is- gested31––stay tuned! sue (2021). This work was supported by the US Department of En- 14. R. MOORE and E. N. BROWN, “Woolwich, Bruceton, Los ergy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos: Munroe Jets and the Trinity Gadget,” Nuclear Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Triad Na- Technology, this issue (2021). tional Security, LLC, for the NNSA of the US DOE under 15. J. E. MORGAN, “The Origins of Blast Loaded Vessels,” Contract No. 89233218CNA000001. Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021). 16. J. C. MARTZ, F. J. FREIBERT,and D. L. CLARK, “The Taming of Plutonium: Pu Metallurgy and the Manhattan Project,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021). Submitted to ANS/NT (2021). LA-UR-21-21605 DRAFT

17. S. CROCKETT and F. J. FREIBERT, “Equation of State: this as Lowell Wood suggests. But Kunkle’s research to Manhattan Project Developments and Beyond,” Nuclear date has not unearthed any direct evidence that the Gud- Technology, this issue (2021). erley’s 1942 German hydrodynamics implosion paper was known by any Manhattan Project researchers. It is quite 18. D. CLARK,D.A.GEESON,andR. J. HANRAHAN, Pluto- nium Handbook, American Nuclear Society Publishing, IL possible that Guderley’s research was not commissioned by (2019). the German wartime atomic energy project. I gather, from Kunkle, that Guderley himself denied a connection. (Sept 19. S. K. HANSON and W. J. OLDHAM, “Weapons Radio- 1, 2020). chemistry: Trinity and Beyond,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021).

20. D. J. MERCER, K. E. KOEHLER, and M. P. CROCE, “Gamma and Decay Energy Spectroscopy Measurements of Trinitite,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021).

21. H. D. SELBYETAL., “A New Yield Assessment for the Trinity Nuclear Test, 75 Years Later,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021).

22. J. KATZ, “Fermi at Trinity,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021).

23. R. BATY and S. RAMSEY, “On the Symmetry of Blast Waves,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021).

24. J. P. LESTONE,andM. D. ROSEN, “Comparison between historic nuclear explosion yield formulas,” Nuclear Tech- nology, this issue (2021).

25. G. FARMELO, The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Mystic of the Atom, Basic Books, Perseus Books Group , New York (2011).

26. T. A. CHADWICK and M. B. CHADWICK, “Who Invented the Trinity Nuclear Test’s Christy Gadget?: Patents and Ev- idence from the Archives,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021).

27. R. MOORE, “Peierls’s 1945 Paper “Outline of the Develop- ment of the British Tube Alloy Project”,” Nuclear Technol- ogy, this issue (2021).

28. A.B.CARR, “Thirty Minutes Before Dawn: The Story of Trinity,” Nuclear Technology, this issue (2021).

29. S. L. SIMONETAL., “US National Cancer Insti- tute: Cancer Risk Projection Study for the Trinity Nuclear Test—Community Summary,” Health Physics, 119, 4 (2020; see https://dcegcancergov/research/how- we-study/exposure-assessment/community-summary ; also see the video summary link from the webpage: https://dcegcancergov/research/how-we-study/exposure- assessment/trinity).

30. L. HODDESON, P. W. HENRIKSEN,R. A. MEADE, and C.WESTFALL, Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos During the Oppenheimer Years, 1943-1945, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1993).

31. L. WOOD, private communication to MBC, 9/1/2020; see the last reference in Ref.26 in this issue. From the documen- tary evidence that Kunkle has shared with me, is is clear that the German military was considering nuclear implo- sion concepts from an early date, and that therefore it seems quite possible that von Neumann had heard something of