Submitted to ANS/NT (2021). ’LA-UR-21-21605 DRAFT Foreword: Manhattan Project Nuclear Science & Technology Developments at Los Alamos Mark B. Chadwick* Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545 The year 2020 marked the 75th anniversaryof the Trin- Our universities’ science and engineering luminaries, ity experiment, the world’s first nuclear explosion, on together with their best graduate students, came together July 16, 1945, near Alamogordo, New Mexico. Trinity at various Manhattan Project locations across the country was a vital proof step toward the culmination of the Man- under intense pressure and worked at a frenetic wartime hattan Project and the end of World War II. The technical pace to successfully develop a workable atomic bomb. accomplishments made by scientists and engineers from This gathering of scientific and technical excellence was the US, UK, and Canada (some originating in Germany, a unique event in our history, and their collective effort Hungary, Italy, France, and other countries) were recog- led to a remarkable outpouring of scientific creativity in nized by many events in 2020, including a visit to New nuclear and material sciences and in hydrodynamics and Mexico’s Los Alamos National Laboratory by Depart- neutronics computations, and led to the creation of what ment of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Admin- would become today’s US DOE national laboratories. istration (NNSA) dignitaries, historical documentaries,1, 2 The historic effort was facilitated in large part by Oppen- and the publication of an excellent book, Trinity, by physi- heimer’s superb (and, at the time, unproven) leadership. cist Frank Close.3 The importance of Trinity as a foun- The Manhattan Project, together with the MIT Radiation dational accomplishment for the broad nuclear science Laboratory’s wartime work on radar and E.O. Lawrence’s and engineering community is clear; indeed, New Mex- accelerator research, represents the beginnings of big sci- ico’s chapter of the American Nuclear Society (ANS) is ence, bringing thousands of researchers together to solve referred to as the “Trinity Section.” The events surround- problems, a model that has since proved so effective for ing Trinity have even entered into high culture with re- the scientific community in the field of particle physics, cent performances of John Adams’s opera Doctor Atomic sequencing of the human genome, and the discovery of in San Francisco, Amsterdam, Chicago, New York, and gravitational waves. Santa Fe. To recognize the Trinity anniversary, this special is- At a high-powered meeting in May 1945, with Van- sue of Nuclear Technology focuses on aspects of the nebar Bush, Gen. George Marshall, Gen. Leslie Groves, science and engineering breakthroughs made during the Arthur Compton, James Conant, Robert Oppenheimer, Manhattan Project at Los Alamos (then called Project Y), Enrico Fermi, and Ernest Lawrence in attendance, Sec- 1943–1945. Both technical papers and technical history retary of War Harry L. Stimson spoke the prescient (if papers are included. Their goal is to clarify the nature somewhat grandiose) words: “This project [Manhattan of the breakthroughs made, correct previous misunder- arXiv:2103.05699v1 [physics.hist-ph] 9 Mar 2021 Project] should not be considered simply in terms of mil- standings in the open literature, illuminate fascinating as- itary weapons, but as a new relationship of man to the pects of the underlying research, and illustrate how sci- universe. This discovery might be compared to the discov- ence from 75 years ago has proven foundational for the eries of the Copernican theory and of the laws of gravity, peaceful use of nuclear energy and today’s nuclear tech- but far more important than these in its effect on the lives nology. These papers benefit from the authors’ access to of men. While the advances in the field to date had been extensive material in our Los Alamos National Security fostered by the needs of war, it was important to realize Research Center (NSRC) archives, much of which has that the implications of the project went far beyond the not been available to broader audiences. needs of the present war. It must be controlled if possi- The idea of this special issue grew out of a seminar se- ble to make it an assurance of future peace rather than ries that I hosted at Los Alamos in the summer of 2020. menace to civilization”.4 Afterward, I challenged our staff to write up their work *corresponding author: [email protected] as technical papers to be published in an internal Los Submitted to ANS/NT (2021). LA-UR-21-21605 DRAFT Alamos classified research journal. The invitation was cal measurements from which bare critical masses could extended to colleagues at the Lawrence Livermore Na- be estimated with extrapolative calculations. Sood et al.8 tional Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, and the describe the evolution of neutronics calculational capabil- Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) at Aldermaston ities from early neutron diffusion work to subsequent re- in the UK (appropriate given the large British contribu- finements by Serber and Wilson (a British researcher) and tion to the Manhattan Project). The authors overcame the postwar innovations of Sn deterministic and Monte substantial challenges in completing the papers during Carlo neutron-transport simulations. the COVID-19 pandemic, not least of which was the Andrews, Andrews, and Mason9 describe the Canadian limited access to our onsite archives. Despite this, our work at the Montreal Laboratory and Chalk River and the project led to the fascinating suite of papers presented essential role Canada played in supplying nuclear mate- here. Subsequent discussions with the American Nuclear rials for the Manhattan Project. The authors also tell of Society resulted in the decision to make this scholarship the contributions of the talented Canadians who came to available to a broader readership by publishing the unclas- work on the Manhattan Project in the US. The Montreal sified papers in this special issue of Nuclear Technology Laboratory’s work was focused on neutronic criticality with open access. theory and heavy-water-moderated reactor experimenta- Below, I summarize some of the key insights to be tion––research that proved to be important for postwar found in this collection of papers. CANDU reactor development. Nuclear science and technology. Ref.5 documents Hydrodynamics. Morgan and Archer10 describe the neutron cross sections measured with increasing ac- Los Alamos’ Theoretical Division’s Lagrangian hydrody- curacy during the Manhattan Project. Accurate neutron namic shock calculations, implemented on IBM punched- cross sections were needed to determine critical masses card machines. Their paper presents the algorithmic ad- and, therefore, the quantities of 235U and 239Pu required vances made during the Manhattan Project by von Neu- from Oak Ridge and Hanford. In short order, four uni- mann that led to the late-1940s formulation of computa- versity accelerators were disassembled and reassembled tional fluid dynamics by von Neumann and Richtmyer at Los Alamos, and methods were established to make that is today the basis of simulations of everything from measurements on extremely small samples owing to the climate change to nuclear reactor design. But Morgan initial lack of availability of enriched 235U and plutonium. and Archer also illuminate the less appreciated, but very In just two years, advances in experimental methods led influential, roles of Peierls and Skyrme. The authors to measured nuclear data that are surprisingly close to show that the first usage of “artificial viscosity,” a con- today’s best values in our Evaluated Nuclear Data Files cept central to computational hydrodynamics, appears to (ENDF). Many of the key original papers and numerical originate with Peierls in 1944. Skyrme is well known to values have now been archived through a collaboration nuclear and particle physicists, but few know of his shock- with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) physics research. Indeed, it was the expertise in shock and Brookhaven National Laboratory in the internation- physics that was especially sought after by Oppenheimer ally available Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data (EX- and Bethe in the British Mission that brought two dozen FOR) database. Also, an early, little-known British pa- British scientists to New Mexico in 1944. Other papers per is transcribed5 : Bretscher’s 1940 description of the describe the history of the Los Alamos computing facil- usefulness of plutonium, written around the time that the ity, focusing first on the “human computers” (Lewis11) element was discovered. and then the IBM punched-card computations (Archer12) Papers on the first fast critical assemblies (Hutchinson needed for hydrodynamics and neutronics. et al.6) and pulsed and solution assembly experiments High explosives. The implosion design of the Fat (Kimpland et al.7) provide details about how critical Man atomic bomb relied on precision-engineered high masses were determined and how they influenced subse- explosives (HE) to symmetrically compress a solid ball quent research across the world on nuclear criticality and of plutonium. Brown and Borovina13 describe this HE criticality safety. The Los Alamos “water boiler” assem- work, its subsequent impact on broader shaped-charge bly was the world’s third reactor to become operational technology, and its use in mining, oil recovery, and even (in 1944, after Chicago’s CP-1 and Oak Ridge’s X-10 SpaceX multistage rocket separation. AWE’s Moore14 piles), the first to use a solution, and the first to use en- describes pioneering British work on explosive shaped riched uranium fuel. During the Manhattan Project, bare charges that influenced von Neumann, Neddermeyer, and critical masses were not measured directly—there was Tuck’s HE lens design. Indeed, it was new to me that insufficient time or material; instead, the wartime mea- both types of explosives used in the Trinity explosive lens surements focused on reflected assemblies and subcriti- system––“Comp B” (a mixture of RDX and TNT) and Submitted to ANS/NT (2021).