DOCSLIB.ORG

Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks Watersheds Technical Update Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks Watersheds Technical Update Report EtobicokE and MiMico creeks WatErshEds technical Update report 2010 Prepared by: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority acknowledgements The Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks Watersheds Technical Update Report was prepared by staff of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. Appreciation and thanks are extended to members of the Etobicoke and Mimico Watersheds Coalition, staff from watershed municipalities and government partners who provided input at various stages of the study. ©Copyright Toronto and Region Conservation 5 Shoreham Drive ,Downsview, Ontario, M3N 1S4, Canada Ph: (416) 661-6600 www.trca.on.ca ISBN 978-0-9811107-6-9 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. i 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Technical Update Approach............................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Report Scope and Organization...................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Watershed Vision............................................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Watershed Objectives, Indicators and Targets............................................................... 1-3 2.0 STUDY AREA AND PHYSICAL SETTING .................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Study Area and Location ................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Watershed and Subwatershed Boundaries ................................................................... .2-1 2.3 Land Use and Population ................................................................................................ 2-3 2.3.1 Current Land Use and Population....................................................................... 2-4 2.3.2 Planned Development ......................................................................................... 2-6 2.4 Climate .................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.5 Physiographic Regions.................................................................................................. 2-10 2.6 Surficial Geology and Geology ..................................................................................... 2-11 2.6.1 Scarborough Formation .................................................................................... 2-11 2.6.2 Sunnybrook Diamict .......................................................................................... 2-17 2.6.3 Thorncliffe Formation......................................................................................... 2-17 2.6.4 Newmarket Till ................................................................................................... 2-17 2.6.5 Oak Ridges Moraine and Mackinaw Interstadial Deposits ............................... 2-17 2.6.6 Halton Till ........................................................................................................... 2-17 2.6.7 Recent Deposits................................................................................................. 2-18 2.7 References….. ............................................................................................................... 2-21 3.0 GROUNDWATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY ............................................................ 3-1 3.1 Watershed Objectives, Indicators and Targets............................................................... 3-2 3.2 Objectives of Technical Update ...................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 Data Sources and Methods............................................................................................. 3-3 3.3.1 Data Sources ....................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3.2 Methods ............................................................................................................... 3-4 3.4 Existing Conditions and Interpretation............................................................................ 3-5 3.4.1 Hydrogeologic Units............................................................................................ 3-5 3.4.2 Groundwater Recharge ..................................................................................... 3-11 3.4.3 Groundwater Levels........................................................................................... 3-11 3.4.4 Groundwater Modelling..................................................................................... 3-23 3.4.5 Water Budget ..................................................................................................... 3-23 3.4.6 Groundwater Quality.......................................................................................... 3-34 3.5 Management Recommendations .................................................................................. 3-35 3.5.1 Development within former Brampton Esker Aggregate Pits........................... 3-35 3.5.2 Groundwater Recharge ..................................................................................... 3-37 3.5.3 Groundwater Levels........................................................................................... 3-38 3.5.4 Groundwater Quality.......................................................................................... 3-39 3.6 References ................................................................................................................ 3-40 3.7 Appendix 3-A: Aerial photographs of Esker Lake North taken between 1999 and 2007…………................................................................................................................. 3-42 Toronto Region Conservation, 2010 i 4.0 BASEFLOW AND WATER USE.................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Watershed Objectives, Indicators and Targets............................................................... 4-2 4.2 Objectives of Technical Update ...................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Data Sources and Methods............................................................................................. 4-2 4.3.1 Baseflow Data ...................................................................................................... 4-2 4.3.2 Groundwater Data ............................................................................................... 4-3 4.3.3 Surface Water Use Data ...................................................................................... 4-3 4.3.4 Streamflow and Climate Data.............................................................................. 4-3 4.4 Existing Conditions and Interpretation............................................................................ 4-4 4.4.1 Baseflow Trends .................................................................................................. 4-4 4.4.2 Measured Baseflow Findings .............................................................................. 4-9 4.4.3 Etobicoke and Mimico Creek Water Use .......................................................... 4-17 4.4.4 Summary of Findings ........................................................................................ 4-23 4.5 Management Recommendations .................................................................................. 4-25 4.6 References….. ............................................................................................................... 4-27 5.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND STREAMFLOW ............................................. 5-1 5.1 Watershed Objectives, Indicators and Targets............................................................... 5-3 5.2 Objectives of Technical Update ...................................................................................... 5-4 5.3 Data Sources and Methods............................................................................................. 5-4 5.3.1 Data Sources ....................................................................................................... 5-4 5.3.2 Method ................................................................................................................. 5-5 5.4 Existing Conditions and Interpretation............................................................................ 5-6 5.4.1 Existing Land Use................................................................................................ 5-6 5.4.2 Areas Covered by Comprehensive Stormwater Management (SWM)Plans.... 5-10 5.4.3 Existing SWM Controls ...................................................................................... 5-15 5.4.4 Stormwater Management Quality Treatment .................................................... 5-20 5.4.5 Stormwater Management Erosion Control........................................................ 5-24 5.4.6 Stormwater Management Quantity Control ...................................................... 5-27 5.4.7 Stormwater Management Retrofit Plans/ Strategies......................................... 5-30 5.4.8 Streamflow ......................................................................................................... 5-33 5.4.9 Summary of Recent Studies Relating to Stormwater Management................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4444 Burnhamthorpe PIC3.Indd
    Burnhamthorpe Road East Class Environmental Assessment elcome W to Public Information Centre No. 3 for the Burnhamthorpe Road East From Arista Way to Dixie Road Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study May 12, 2009 You can participate in this study by: • Signing the attendance register, • Reviewing the display panels, • Asking questions and discussing your idea with us, • Submitting your completed Comment Form by May 29, 2009, and • Indicating whether you would like to be added to the study mailing list on your Comment Form. Burnhamthorpe Road East Class Environmental Assessment Introduction • The City of Mississauga initiated a Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) Study, ‘Schedule C.’ • The study limits on Burnhamthorpe Road East are from Arista Way (just east of Hurontario Street) to Dixie Road. • Within the study area, Burnh amthorpe Road East has a posted speed limit of 60 km/hr generally consists of a four lane urban cross section, except for a few sections on the north side where there are rural cross sections. • In the north boulevard of Burnhamthorpe Road East, between Little Etobicoke Creek and Dixie Road, there is a multi-use recreational trail (Burnhamthorpe Trail). • Burnhamthorpe Road East crosses over the east and west branches of Cooksville Creek and Little Etobicoke Creek. • The study will determine future transportation needs to accomodate: • The anticipated growth in the City Centre and future employment development around the Lester B. Pearson Airport and in the South Dixie Road area, and • The needs of pedestrian, cyclist, transit and vehicular users of Burnhamthorpe Road East. ® May 12, 2009 2 Burnhamthorpe Road East Class Environmental Assessment Study Area H w y 4 0 3 Eglinton Ave E Eastgate Pkwy Hwy 403 Huron C T a o C w m en tario St tario t k h tra e r D a n i x l Pkw l R R i d e d R d y E Burnhamthorpe Rd E A ri s ta W a y Bloor St Study Area Dundas St E ® May 12, 2009 3 Burnhamthorpe Road East Class Environmental Assessment Purpose of Study 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Etobicoke Creek Kiosk Design
    LITTLE ETOBICOKE CREEK KIOSK DESIGN Kathleen Corey and Sarah Taslimi LARC 643 November 07, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AERIAL CONTEXT PHOTOGRAPH We would like to thank Bob Levesque for taking the time to Dixie Road Acknowledgements ... 2 Figure 1: Aerial Context Photograph ... 2 guide us through Little Etobicoke Creek, and Mark Inglis for providing valuable technical information on which to base our designs. N Executive Summary ... 2 Figure 2: Dixie Farmerettes ... 3 Kennedy Park Introduction ... 2 Figure 3: Vegetation ... 4 Burnhamthorpe EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Public Lit School tle Literature Review ... 3 Figure 4: Pathway Flooding ... 6 • The purpose of this study is to develop an interpretive kiosk Et coke Burnhamthorpe Road East obi Cr for Little Etobicoke creek, based on an informed Landscape eek Methodology ... 3 Figure 5: Physiography Map ... 7 Resource analysis. • This study was requested by Mark Inglis. Dufferin-Peel Applewood Findings ... 3 - 10 Figure 6: Option 1 Perspective ... 11 • An investigation was conducted jointly by Kathleen Corey and Catholic District Hills Park Sarah Taslimi. School Board Kiosk Design Options ... 11 - 12 Figure 7: Option 2 Perspective ... 12 • The main findings are that the creek is slowly regenerating Tomken Road Bloor Street through rehabilitation efforts. Recommendation ... 13 Figure 8: Option 2 Section ... 12 • It was concluded that an interpretive kiosk be provided to educate the public about this environmental regeneration. Appendices: Figures 9: Little Etobicoke Creek ... 13 • It is recommended that the first kiosk option be implemented following further consultation. Figure 1 A: Arborist Report ... 14 LIST OF TABLES B: Drawing 1 – Landscape Units Map ..
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Compliance Approval 1234-9Zkkb8
    Content Copy Of Original Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Ministère de l’Environnement et de l’Action en matière de changement climatique ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE APPROVAL NUMBER 1234-9ZKKB8 Issue Date: August 26, 2015 1751504 Ontario Inc. 5255 Forest Walk Circle Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 4A1 Site Location: 1094 Eglinton Avenue East Lot 8, Concession 2 NDS City of Mississauga, Regional Municipality of Peel You have applied under section 20.2 of Part II.1 of the Environmental Protection Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. E. 19 (Environmental Protection Act) for approval of: construction of stormwater infrastructure at 1094 Eglinton Avenue East, in the City of Mississauga, consisting of the following: storm sewer , approximately 20 metres in length, located in the southern portion of the property, complete with plug, connected to outfall described below; storm sewer outfall , 375 millimetre diameter outfall with concrete headwall and erosion protection, discharging to the Little Etobicoke Creek; including erosion/sedimentation control measures during construction and all other controls and appurtenances essential for the proper operation of the aforementioned Works; all in accordance with the submitted application and supporting documents listed in Schedule "A" forming part of this Approval. For the purpose of this environmental compliance approval, the following definitions apply: 1. "Approval" means this Environmental Compliance Approval and any Schedules to it, including the application and supporting documentation; 2. "Director" means any Ministry employee appointed by the Minister pursuant to section 5 of the Part II.1 of the Environmental Protection Act; 3. "District Manager" means the District Manager of the appropriate local District Office of the Ministry, where the Works are geographically located; 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Design Applications in Southwestern Ontario
    EVALUATION OF 'NATURAL' CHANNEL DESIGN APPLICATIONS IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Guelph by RYAN NESS In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science August, 2001 ORyan Ness, 2001 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 of du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. me Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Yovr fi@ Votre rBfemce Our fil8 Notre rëfdrence The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exctusive licence diowing the exclusive permettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fïlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protege cette thèse. thesis nor substantid extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT EVALUATION OF 'NATURAL' CHANNEL DESIGN APPLICATIONS IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO Xyan Ness Advisor: University of Guelph, 2001 Dr. D. Joy .Natural7 channel design is a practice increasingly used in restoration projects to construct watercourse channels that emulate the physical form and function of natural fluvial systems.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX B Natural Environment Information
    APPENDIX B Natural Environment Information Appendix B - Table of Contents A.1 Species Lists A.1.1 Fish Species A.1.1.1 List of Fish Species of Conservation Concern A.1.1.2 List of Fish Species of Sampled by TRCA in Etobicoke Creek and Little Etobicoke Creek A.1.2 Wildlife and Vegetation Species A.1.2.1 List of Wildlife Species Recorded Within and in the Vicinity of the Project Limits A.1.2.2 List of Wildlife Species List by Vegetation Communities A.1.2.3 List of Vegetation Species Recorded Within and in the Vicinity of the Project Limits A.1.2.4 List of Vegetation Species List by Vegetation Communities A.1.3 Legend A.2 Field Photographs A.2.1 Fish Habitat A.2.2 Vegetation Communities A.3 DFO Fish Species at Risk Map A.4 Background Information List A.1 Species Lists A.1.1 Fish Species A.1.1.1 List of Fish Species of Conservation Concern Fish Species of Conservation Concern Species GRANK SRANK COSEWIC MNR Comments Recorded in Little Etobicke Creek in 1949 near Burnamthorpe Road. (NHIC, 2008). Redside Redside Dace Dace has likely been extirpated from the G4 S3 SC THR (Clinostomus elongatus) Etobicoke Creek Watershed (Redside Dace Recovery Strategy, and Pers. Comm. Scott Smith, July 29, 2008) Source: Natural Heritage Information Centre website, 2008 Legend See Section A.1.3 A.1.1.2 List of Fish Species of Sampled by TRCA in Etobicoke Creek and Little Etobicoke Creek Fish species sampled by TRCA in Etobicoke Creek and Little Etobicoke Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H Natural Heritage Assessment Report
    Appendix H Natural Heritage Assessment Report Natural Heritage Existing Conditions Report Mayfield Road From Chinguacousy Road to Heart Lake Road Class Environmental Assessment Regional Municipality of Peel July, 2014 Prepared for: Region of Peel 10 Peel Centre Drive Suite A and B Brampton, Ontario L6T 4B9 Prepared by: GENIVAR Inc. 126 Don Hillock Drive, Unit 2 Aurora, Ontario, L1N 6A3 Project No. 101-17262-00 Distribution: 3 c Client 1 c File Project No. 101-17262-00 July 24, 2014 Region of Peel 10 Peel Centre Drive Suite A and B Brampton, Ontario L6T 4B9 Re: Mayfield Road From Chinguacousy Road to Heart Lake Road Natural Heritage Existing Conditions Report Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Regional Municipality of Peel Dear Sirs: GENIVAR has been retained to conduct a Natural Heritage Existing Conditions Report as part of the Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment for the proposed development on Mayfield Road from Chinguacousy Road to Heart Lake Road. The Study Area can be described as Part of Lots 17 and 18 on Concession 2 West of Centre Road, 17 and 18 on Concession 1 West of Centre Road, 17 and 18 on Concession 1 East of Centre Road and 17 and 18 on Concession 2 West of Centre Road, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel. This report outlines the existing conditions in the Study Area at the time of the August and September 2011 site visits and provides an assessment of the potential impacts associated with the proposed roadway improvements. Also provided are recommendations to mitigate potential impacts. Please find the document attached for your records.
    [Show full text]
  • Dixie-Dundas Flood Mitigation Study
    11.8 Appendix 1 Version 3.0 April 28, 2021 Matrix 24603-531 City of Mississauga PO 4500498356 Mr. Anthony Di Giandomenico, P. Eng. Storm Drainage Engineer, Environmental Services CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Suite 800, 201 City Centre Dr. Mississauga, ON L5B 2T4 Subject: Dixie-Dundas Flood Mitigation Detailed Work Plan for an Expanded Environmental Assessment Using a Combined Schedule C Approach Dear Mr. Di Giandomenico: 1 INTRODUCTION Matrix Solutions is pleased to provide this work plan and cost estimate to the City of Mississauga (the City) for an expanded Dixie-Dundas flood mitigation environmental assessment (EA) to address flooding issues associated with the Little Etobicoke Creek. This letter follows our February 19, 2021 letter, which outlined options for expanding the scope of the EA. Alternative approaches were presented in our original letter which ensured the requirements of a Schedule C EA are addressed for the original study area (the project was initially scoped as a Schedule B) and incorporated the recent hydraulic modelling, which indicated that expansion of the study area downstream to include the Dundas Street crossing is required to ensure adequate and full consideration of project impacts. Additionally, options were provided to address additional channel stability concerns and an exposed sanitary sewer into the EA. After reviewing the alternatives, we understand the City has selected the combined Schedule C approach and confirmed that additional channel stability requirements and addressing the exposed sewer should be integrated into the EA scope. This current work plan builds off the previous letter, which was prepared to support City decision-making and to provide high-level costs.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Natural' Channel Design Projects
    Evaluating the Effectiveness of ‘Natural’ Channel Design Projects: An Introduction and Preliminary Assessment of Sites in TRCA’s Jurisdiction Prepared by: Final Report 2009 Geomorphic Solutions, Sernas Group Inc. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority LGL Limited EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ‘NATURAL’ CHANNEL DESIGN PROJECTS: AN INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF SITES IN TRCA’s JURISDICTION Final Report Prepared by: Geomorphic Solutions, Sernas Group Inc. The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority LGL Limited February 2009 © Toronto and Region Conservation Authority A Literature Review and Preliminary Assessment of ‘Natural’ Channel Design Projects NOTICE The contents of this report do not necessarily represent the policies of the supporting agencies. Although every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the integrity of the report, the supporting agencies do not make any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of those products. PUBLICATION INFORMATION Reports conducted under the Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program (STEP) are available at www.sustainabletechnologies.ca. For more information about this report and other STEP studies, please contact: Tim Van Seters Manager, Sustainable Technologies Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4 Tel: 416-661-6600, Ext. 5337 Fax: 416-661-6898 E-mail: [email protected] Final Report Page i A Literature Review and Preliminary Assessment of ‘Natural’ Channel Design Projects THE SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES EVALUATION PROGRAM The Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program (STEP) is a multi-agency program, led by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA).
    [Show full text]
  • TRCA Etobicoke Creek Watershed Characterization Report
    Etobicoke Creek Watershed Characterization Report June 2021 TRCA Etobicoke Creek Watershed Characterization Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Watershed planning helps to characterize overall watershed conditions and identify measures to protect, restore, or enhance the health of the watershed. Watershed characterization is one of the preliminary stages of the watershed planning process. The last Etobicoke Creek watershed plan was developed in 2002 with a Technical Update completed in 2010 that filled data gaps from the original plan and used updated science. It is important to regularly update watershed plans to review progress from previous plans, reflect current conditions, use the latest science, policies, and best practices, and adjust management approaches. This Characterization Report presents the findings from extensive monitoring data and technical analyses, organized as follows: 1. Introduction – provides an overview of watershed planning, the geographic context for Etobicoke Creek and land use change since 2002. 2. Existing Watershed Conditions – identifies the findings and results of watershed characterization and comprises the bulk of this report. This section explains the various technical analyses completed, identifies key findings, and presents detailed results for each technical component. 3. Policy Inventory – provides an overview of existing municipal policies as they relate to watershed planning broadly and Etobicoke Creek specifically. 4. Methodology – provides an overview of the technical methodologies used to complete the analyses for each technical component outlined in section 2. 5. Maps – contains the maps referenced as figures throughout the report. Etobicoke Creek forms the western end of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority’s (TRCA) jurisdiction, originating just south of the Oak Ridges Moraine in the Town of Caledon before flowing through the cities of Brampton, Mississauga, and Toronto, where it enters Lake Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    Executive Committee Meeting Revised Agenda #5/18 July 6, 2018 9:30 A.M. HEAD OFFICE, 101 EXCHANGE AVENUE, VAUGHAN Members: Chair Maria Augimeri Vice Chair Jack Heath Jack Ballinger Vincent Crisanti Glenn De Baeremaeker Chris Fonseca Brenda Hogg Jennifer Innis Colleen Jordan Mike Mattos Jennifer McKelvie - Leave of Absence Anthony Perruzza Pages 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INDIGENOUS TERRITORIES 2. MINUTES OF MEETING #4/18, HELD ON JUNE 8, 2018 Minutes Link 3. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES 4. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 5. DELEGATIONS 6. PRESENTATIONS 7. CORRESPONDENCE 8. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION 8.1 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2016-2020 6 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed Condor Properties Ltd. (CFN 59887) 8.2 ARGO CALEDON CORPORATION AND TOWN OF CALEDON 9 Request for a Permanent Easement for a Storm Water Outlet, Town of Caledon, Regional Municipality of Peel, Etobicoke Creek Watershed (CFN 59886) 8.3 CITY OF TORONTO 12 Request for a Permanent Easement Required for the Ashbridges Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant Outfall, City of Toronto, Lake Ontario Waterfront (CFN 59941) 8.4 CITY OF TORONTO AND PHANTOM DEVELOPMENT LTD. 15 Proposal to Enter into a Park Management Agreement for the Rear of 2175 Lakeshore Boulevard, City of Toronto, Lake Ontario Waterfront (CFN 54024) 8.5 GIBRALTAR POINT EROSION CONTROL PROJECT 18 Contract #10007876 8.6 RENTAL OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 22 Vendor of Record Contract #10007626 9. SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ACTION 10. SECTION III - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 11. SECTION IV - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED PERMIT APPLICATIONS 11.1 - 11.4 ARE MAJOR APPLICATION - REGULAR Applications that involved a more complex suite of technical studies to demonstrate consistency with policies; applications that cover a significant geographic area (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • For Regional Watershed Alliance 9/16/2020 6
    Regional Watershed Alliance Agenda #3/20 September 16, 2020 6:30 P.M. The meeting will be conducted via a video conference Members of the public may view the livestream at the following link: https://video.isilive.ca/trca/live.html Pages 1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS 2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INDIGENOUS TERRITORY 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MEETING #2/20, HELD ON MAY 20, 2020 Minutes Link 4. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 5. PRESENTATIONS 6. CORRESPONDENCE 7. ITEMS FOR ALLIANCE ACTION 7.1 ETOBICOKE CREEK WATERSHED PLAN AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY 3 Report and presentation by Tony Morris, Project Manager, Watershed Planning and Reporting, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority To provide information to and seek guidance from the Regional Watershed Alliance on the Engagement Strategy in support of updating the Etobicoke Creek Watershed Plan (ECWP) as part of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) next generation of watershed planning. 8. ITEMS FOR ALLIANCE INFORMATION 8.1 UPDATE ON FLOOD RISK OUTREACH PROGRAM AND REMEDIATION 20 PROJECTS Report and presentation by Rehana Rajabali, Associate Director, Engineering Services, Development and Engineering Services, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Summary of the outreach activities undertaken in flood vulnerable neighbourhoods as part of the National Disaster Mitigation Program (NDMP) funded Flood Risk Public Awareness and Education Program, and overview of flood remediation activities in select flood vulnerable clusters. 8.2 COVID-19 UPDATE 30 Report by Victoria Kramkowski, Government and Community Relations Specialist, Peel-York Watersheds, Government and Community Relations, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority To provide an update to the Regional Watershed Alliance regarding the ongoing strategic and tactical response to COVID-19 and the mitigation of risks to employees and members of the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Etobicoke Creek Watershed Report Card 2013
    Facts and Figures What We Are Doing What You Can Do Where We Are • From 2008 to 2012, TRCA planted 105,490 trees and shrubs in the watershed, actively • Divert your downspouts away from paved areas and install a rain barrel to capture We are one of Municipalities Toronto, Peel, Brampton, Caledon, Mississauga restoring and enhancing those natural heritage areas identified as priorities. Healthy and reuse the rainwater that falls on your roof. This reduces run-off to sewers, 36 Conservation Tributaries Spring Creek, Little Etobicoke Creek, West Etobicoke Creek forests provide habitat for wildlife, help cool urban areas, retain water and reduce prevents flooding and saves money on your water bill. Authorities across Length of Major Tributaries (km) West Etobicoke – 42, Main Etobicoke – 17, Spring Creek – 23 Ontario under run-off, and capture CO2 from the air to minimize the impacts of climate change. Etobicoke Creek Watershed the umbrella Mean Stream Flow 2.3 m3/sec • Reduce or eliminate the use of salt, pesticides and fertilizers, which contaminate organization of 2 Area (km ) 212 • TRCA’s County Court Sustainable Neighbourhood Retrofit Action Plan (SNAP) in rivers, ponds and groundwater supplies. Report Card 2013 Conservation Population (2011) 286,360 the City of Brampton, is engaging approximately 1,000 single family homes in Ontario. Land Use Rural – 22%, Urbanizing – 7%, Urban – 71% eco-friendly renovations that improve both water and energy efficiency inside and • Volunteer for community tree plantings, litter pick-ups or other stewardship Physiographic Regions South Slope, Peel Plain, Iroquois Plain outside the home. SNAP is working with project partners to explore innovative events.
    [Show full text]