DOCSLIB.ORG

Second Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions Reviewed by the United States Supreme Court

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Second Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions Reviewed by the United States Supreme Court itUh§ econd @ircuit A Collection of History Lectures delivered by Judges of the Second Circuit Published by the Federal Bar Council Foundation 1992 69 Vnited cltates @ourts itttht cSecond Gircuit Copyright© 1992 by the Federal Bar Foundation The material in this volume may be quoted without permission with appropriate source credit and citation. The citation should identify the author, title and date of the particular lecture, followed by the words: "published in United States Courts in the Second Circuit, Federal Bar Foundation, 1992." Additional copies of this volume (while the supply lasts) may be purchased from: Federal Bar Foundation 145 East 49th Street New York, New York 10017 (212) 644-9771 Contents Page Introduction Whitney North Seymour, Jr. United States District Court for tlze Southern District of New York Hon. Edward Weinfeld (1981) 1 United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York Hon. Eugene A. Nickerson (1982) 24 United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Hon. Jose A. Cabranes (1983) 38 United States District Court for the Nortlzem District of New York Hon. Roger J. Miner (1984) 62 United States District Court for tlze District of Vermont Hon. Albert W Coffrin (1985) 109 United States District Court for the Western District of New York Hon. John T. Curtin (1986) 124 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Hon. Roger]. Miner (1991) 138 Contents Page Introduction Whitney North Seymour, Jr. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Hon. Edward Weinfeld (1981) 1 United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York Hon. Eugene A. Nickerson (1982) 24 United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Hon. Jose A. Cabranes (1983) 38 United States District Court for the Northern District of New York Hon. Roger J. Miner (1984) 62 United States District Court for the District of Vermont Hon. Albert W Coffrin (1985) 109 United States District Court for the Western District of New York Hon. John I Curtin (1986) 124 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Hon. Roger J. Miner (1991) 138 Second Circuit History Lectures United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit One Hundred Years of Influence on National Jurisprudence: Second Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions Reviewed by the United States Supreme Court Hon. Roger J. Miner Circuit Judge October 28, 1991 1891 was a year of notable events in New York City. Carnegie Hall, built with a gift from steel magnate Andrew Carnegie, began its existence with a concert conducted by Tchaikovsky. Dean Theodore Dwight and several profes­ sors resigned their positions at Columbia Law School in a dispute over teaching methods and founded New York Law School, my alma mater. The beautiful New York Botanical Gardens opened in the Bronx. Oscar Wilde's play, "The Duchess of Padua" had its premiere at the Broadway Theater. American Express issued its first Travelers Cheques. George Batten established the first full service advertis­ ing agency, later to be known as Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, and we have been battered and bothered by pervasive advertising ever since. The notable New York Event of 1891 that we celebrate today is the es­ tablishment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, then known as the United States Circuit Court of A~peals for the Second Circuit. The Court was created by the Act of March 3, 1891, popularly known as the Evarts Act after its principal sponsor, Senator William M. Evarts of New York. A distin- 138 Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit guished lawyer, William Evarts served from 1870 to 1879 as the first President of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.2 The Evarts Act was passed by Congress in response to the enormous caseloads facing the federal courts in general and the Supreme Court in particular.3 At the time of its passage, more than 42,000 cases were pending in the federal courts of the nation, approximately 22,000 in the courts within the Second Circuit alone.4 Legislation enacted in 1875 conferring general federal question jurisdiction upon the federal courts and ex­ panding diversity jurisdiction5 contributed in great measure to this volume. The old Circuit Courts, which had exercised both trial and appellate jurisdiction since the creation of the federal courts in 1789, had no judges of their own until1869, originally being composed of a District Court Judge and two Supreme Court Justices "riding circuit."6 In 1869, Congress created a Circuit Judgeship for each of the nine judicial circuits into which the nation then was divided and provided that the Circuit Court could be held by the Circuit Justice, Circuit Judge or District Judge, either alone or in combination? However, the Jus­ tices found it difficult to sit in the Circuits even once every two years as required, the Circuit Judges could not keep up with their case loads and, by the late 1880s, District Judges sitting alone disposed of most of the Circuit Court litigation.8 Despite the addition of another Circuit Court Judgeship in 1887,9 the courts of the Second Circuit were awash in cases at the time of the adoption of the Evarts Act. The Evarts Act established Courts of Appeals within each of the nine ex­ isting circuits, and a joint resolution of Congress required that each of the new Courts hold its first meeting on the third Tuesday in June, 1891.10 Accordingly, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit convened for the first time on June 16, 1891 at the United States Post Office Building and Court­ house, Park Row and Broadway, New York City. Present at the first session were Associate Justice Samuel Blatchford of the Supreme Court and Circuit Judges Wil­ liam J. Wallace and E. Henry Lacombe. 11 Although the other circuits were authorized only twojudges, the Second Circuit was authorized three in the originallegislation.1 Judges Wallace and Lacombe came over from the old Cir~ cuit Court, and Nathaniel Shipman of Connecticut would join the new Court in March of 1892 as its third judge and the first appointed under the Evarts Act. 13 At its initial session on June 16, the new Court appointed a Clerk, a Marshal and a Crier, adopted Rules of Court including a rule that limited oral argument to two hours ~er side, and adjourned until October 27, 1891, the last Tuesday in Oc­ tober.1 The June 17, 1891 edition of the New York Times (Price Two Cents; Sun­ day Edition Five Cents) carried a story of the Court's organizational meeting under the headline, "The New Court of Appeals; It Organized Yesterday and Ad­ journed for the Summer."15 According to the Times, "Justice Blatchford opened 139 Second Circuit History Lectures the proceedings by reading the act under which the new court was established by Congress, and spoke of what its duties and business would be." 16 It also was reported that"[o]n behalf of the bar Joseph H. Choate made a short address con­ cerning the necessity of the new Court of Appeals." 17 Carefully noted by the author of the dispatch was the following: "Judge Wallace sat at the right of the Supreme Court Justice, and Judge Lacombe on the left. All wore black silk robes like those worn in the Supreme Court at Washington."18 I pause here to take note of an advertisement that appeared in the New York Times in the column next to the one describing the opening session of the Court. The advertisement included the following testimonial by one George R Jackson of Roxbury, Connecticut: "My appetite was poor, I could not sleep, had headache a great deal, pains in my back, my bowels did not move regularly. Hood's Sarsaparilla in a short time did me so much good that I feel like a new man. My pains and aches are relieved, my appetite improved."19 I wonder if George Batten had anything to do with that ad! By the way, Hood's Sarsaparilla 20 was available at any druggist, "100 Doses One Dollar." When the Court convened for business on October 27, 1891, precisely one hundred years ago yesterday, Judges Wallace and Lacombe constituted the bench. I spoke about Judge Wallace at some length in my 1984 lecture, "The United States District Court for the Northern District of New York- Its History and Antecedents."21 For today, it suffices to say that Judge Wallace served as Mayor of Syracuse and Judge of the Northern District before becoming a Judge of the old Circuit Court in 1882. He served as the first Senior Circuit Judge of the Court of Appeals, the position now designated as Chief Judge, from the formation 22 of the Court in 1891 until his resignation in 1907. Following my lecture in 1984, the beloved Dan Fusaro, who served as Clerk of our Court for so many years, sent me a copy of a letter written by Judge Wallace to the Treasury Department. The date of the letter is not given, but we do know that a copy was forwarded by Learned Hand to an attorney named George Martin in 1934 with this bit of Hand doggerel verse: "Dear George. This is the letter. Here's the very note, this is what he wrote! L.H." 23 What Judge Wallace wrote was a protest against the disallowance of reimbursement for "water closet paper" purchased at his request by the Marshal. In the letter, the Judge seemingly agonized over the question of whether toilet paper should be considered an item required for official use.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    T a b l e C o n T e n T s I s s u e 9 s u mm e r 2 0 1 3 o f pg 4 pg 18 pg 26 pg 43 Featured articles Pg 4 abraham lincoln and Freedom of the Press A Reappraisal by Harold Holzer Pg 18 interbranch tangling Separating Our Constitutional Powers by Judith s. Kaye Pg 26 rutgers v. Waddington Alexander Hamilton and the Birth Pangs of Judicial Review by David a. Weinstein Pg 43 People v. sanger and the Birth of Family Planning clinics in america by Maria T. Vullo dePartments Pg 2 From the executive director Pg 58 the david a. Garfinkel essay contest Pg 59 a look Back...and Forward Pg 66 society Officers and trustees Pg 66 society membership Pg 70 Become a member Back inside cover Hon. theodore t. Jones, Jr. In Memoriam Judicial Notice l 1 From the executive director udicial Notice is moving forward! We have a newly expanded board of editors Dearwho volunteer Members their time to solicit and review submissions, work with authors, and develop topics of legal history to explore. The board of editors is composed J of Henry M. Greenberg, Editor-in-Chief, John D. Gordan, III, albert M. rosenblatt, and David a. Weinstein. We are also fortunate to have David l. Goodwin, Assistant Editor, who edits the articles and footnotes with great care and knowledge. our own Michael W. benowitz, my able assistant, coordinates the layout and, most importantly, searches far and wide to find interesting and often little-known images that greatly compliment and enhance the articles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Festschrift in Honor of Seymour J. Rubin
    American University International Law Review Volume 10 | Issue 4 Article 3 1995 A Festschrift in onorH of Seymour J. Rubin Claudio Grossman Tom Farer Andreas J. Jacovides Herman Schwartz Bennett Boskey See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Grossman, Claudio, et al. "A Festschrift in onorH of Seymour J. Rubin." American University International Law Review 10, no. 4 (1995): 1215-1274. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Claudio Grossman, Tom Farer, Andreas J. Jacovides, Herman Schwartz, Bennett Boskey, William Diebold, and Christina M. Cerna This article is available in American University International Law Review: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr/vol10/ iss4/3 SEYMOUR J. RUBIN FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF SEYMOUR J. RUBIN Opening Remarks Claudio Grossman Dean, Washington College of Law at The American University It is my honor and pleasure to open this issue of The American Uni- versity Journal of International Law and Policy dedicated to Emeritus Professor of Law, Seymour J. Rubin. Professor Rubin has been a distin- guished member of the faculty and long-time friend of the Washington College of Law. It is very difficult to summarize the tremendous contributions Profes- sor Rubin has made to the field of international law and the Washington College of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Reed Powell on the Roosevelt Court. John Braeman
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 1988 Thomas Reed Powell on the Roosevelt Court. John Braeman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Braeman, John, "Thomas Reed Powell on the Roosevelt Court." (1988). Constitutional Commentary. 503. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/503 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THOMAS REED POWELL ON THE ROOSEVELT COURT John Braeman* In January 1944, historian Charles A. Beard asked Harvard law professor Thomas Reed Powell for his evaluation of the Supreme Court's recent performance. Beard had been among the most forceful critics of the old Court's response to the New Deal. Lashing out against its attempt "to confine the powers of govern­ ment within the narrowest possible limits," he had warned that the Constitution could not-and would not-survive without "loose and general interpretations of its general clauses" to allow "for the use of commensurate national power" to deal with the Depression.! He had even publicly supported Roosevelt's Court-packing scheme as the solution to the impasse.2 And he had hailed the Court's switch-in-time as a turning point in "the battle ... to preserve the balance of powers in government as distinguished from judicial supremacy." 3 In the years that followed, Roosevelt transformed the Court with his own appointees.4 By then, however, Beard had soured on FDR.s How much that disillusionment colored his attitude toward the reconstituted Court must remain a matter of speculation.
    [Show full text]
  • A TALE of TWO HANDS: One Clapping; One Not
    A TALE OF TWO HANDS: One Clapping; One Not Burt Neuborne* My thanks to the editors of the Arizona State Law Journal for organizing this symposium celebrating the 100th anniversary of Judge Learned Hand’s brilliant and courageous, if unsuccessful, effort in Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten1 to slow down the repressive train that was running amok over Americans who vigorously spoke out against America’s entry into World War I. While many have chronicled the major Supreme Court cases from Schenck to Gitlow failing to protect free speech during and after World War I,2 they usually don’t go beneath the surface of the Supreme Court to plumb the massive wave of repression that swept the nation in the summer and fall of 1917, fanned by jingoism, fear of immigrants, war fever, fear of communism, and President Woodrow Wilson’s streak of fanaticism.3 Convinced that he was doing God’s work in committing the nation to a war to make the world safe for democracy, Wilson, a baffling figure who was an appalling racist, an economic reformer, an idealistic internationalist, and the first President to appoint a Jew to the Supreme Court,4 had no qualms about * Norman Dorsen Professor in Civil Liberties, New York University School of Law. I’m sorry that we lost my longtime friend and colleague, Norman Dorsen, who died on July 1, 2017, before he had a chance to join in the festivities. Much of what I say in this essay emerged from almost fifty years of conversations with Norman. We would have enjoyed writing this one together.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE of JUDGE LEARNED HAND: What Endures and Why?
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Articles & Chapters 2018 The iH storical Significance of Judge Learned Hand: What Endures and Why Edward A. Purcell Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters Part of the Judges Commons, and the Legal History Commons THE HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDGE LEARNED HAND: What Endures and Why? Edward A. Purcell, Jr.* The 100th anniversary of Judge Learned Hand's opinion in Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten' invites us to look back on its author's long career and to consider his contributions to American law and his significance in the nation's history. Spanning more than fifty years from the presidency of William Howard Taft to the presidency of John F. Kennedy, Hand's judicial career presents an exceptionally rich subject for such reflection. INTRODUCTION As Gerald Gunther's massive biography2 and Constance Jordan's edition of his letters3 make clear, Learned Hand's life merits scholarly attention for any number of reasons. An unusual personal psychology, friendships with major historical figures, social and political involvements, extensive law reform efforts, highly regarded essays and speeches, insightful and controversial ideas about democracy, and valuable contemporaneous commentaries on the people and events of his day all warrant general interest.4 In revealing ways Hand's life and activities track the course of the nation's history through the first half of the twentieth century. Richard Posner surely betrayed the narrowest of professional, and perhaps judicial, * Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor, New York Law School. I thank the participants in this symposium for comments on a shorter oral presentation and my colleagues at the New York Law School Faculty Colloquium for comments on an earlier and much longer version of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Years of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    St. John's Law Review Volume 65 Number 3 Volume 65, Summer 1991, Number 3 Article 13 Special Supplement: Colleagues For Justice: One Hundred Years of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Second Circuit Historical and Commemorative Events Committee Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in St. John's Law Review by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT The following supplementary section is a copy of an exhibit that is scheduled to open in the Foley Square Courthouse in Manhattan on October 28, 1991. Sponsored by the Second Circuit Historical and Commemorative Events Committee, the exhibit features the deceased judges who served the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Not reproduced here, however, are the photographs and related images that highlight their careers. The Courthouse exhibit also includes photographs of the active court and of the senior judges. ST. JOHN'S LAW REVIEW [Vol. 65:937 COLLEAGUES FOR JUSTICE: ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit hears appeals from decisions of the federal trial courts lo- cated in the States of New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. His- torically, the cases appealed to this court were concentrated in the areas of admiralty, taxation, bankruptcy, antitrust, unfair competi- tion, and patent, trademark, and copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustus Noble Hand / Charles Merrill Hough Roger J
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu Speeches and Writings Legal History 2009 Augustus Noble Hand / Charles Merrill Hough Roger J. Miner '56 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/legal_hist Part of the Judges Commons, and the Legal Biography Commons Recommended Citation Miner '56, Roger J., "Augustus Noble Hand / Charles Merrill Hough" (2009). Legal History. 5. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/legal_hist/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Speeches and Writings at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Legal History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. Hand, Augustus Noble (1869-1954) Judge, United States District court for the Southern District of New York 1914-1927; Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 1928-1954. Augustus N. Hand was born and raised in Elizabethtown, in rural Essex County, New York, where his father practiced law. It was there that he spent the summers of his youth-with his cousin, Billings Learned Hand, whom he would later join on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Augustus graduated from Harvard College in 1890 and from Harvard Law School in 1894. Following graduation, he practiced law successfully in New York City, dealing with important cases in antitrust, international, and constitutional law. Among his more prominent clients was the Government of Venezuela. Appointed by President Wilson to a seat on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Augustus served in that position until his recess appointment to the Second Circuit in 1927 by President Calvin Coolidge.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclaiming a Great Judge's Legacy
    Maine Law Review Volume 46 Number 2 Article 9 June 1994 Reclaiming a Great Judge's Legacy Frank M. Coffin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr Part of the Judges Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Legal Biography Commons, Legal Education Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Legal Writing and Research Commons Recommended Citation Frank M. Coffin, Reclaiming a Great Judge's Legacy, 46 Me. L. Rev. 377 (1994). Available at: https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr/vol46/iss2/9 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEW RECLAIMING A GREAT JUDGE'S LEGACY LEARNED HAND: THE MAN AND THE JUDGE. By Gerald Gunther,1 with a Foreword by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994; pp. 818, $35.00) Reviewed by Frank M. Coffin2 In the legal profession a deep sigh of relief is heard over the land. After roughly two decades of incubation, the long awaited biography of the great judge has arrived, Learned Hand. The Man and the Judge, by Stanford Law Professor Gerald Gunther.3 I approach this work with particular relish. As a law clerk to Maine's United States District Judge John D. Clifford, Jr., I accom- panied him in February of 1949 to the federal courthouse in Foley Square in New York City, where he was assigned to hear admiralty cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissent in the Second Circuit, 1891-1991
    St. John's Law Review Volume 65 Number 3 Volume 65, Summer 1991, Number 3 Article 12 One Hundred Years of Solitude: Dissent in the Second Circuit, 1891-1991 John J. Hoeffner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in St. John's Law Review by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SOLITUDE: DISSENT IN THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 1891-1991 JOHN J. HOEFFNER* No less an authority than Justice Holmes, the "Great Dis- senter" himself, considered dissents generally "useless" and "unde- sirable." While it is probable that almost every judge agrees with Justice Holmes's characterization, it is illustrative of the causes of dissent that almost every judge-if not too modest-probably also can cite from personal experience cases believed to qualify as ex- ceptions to the general rule.1 In recent years in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, at an average rate of ap- proximately once a week, a judge concludes that he or she has found such an exceptional case, and, accordingly, dissents. Part I of this Article will examine the benefits of dissent, and the considerations that may lead a disagreeing judge to refrain from writing separately. Focusing primarily upon the period before 1891, Part II will provide an historical survey of the practice of dissent in the federal appellate courts generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugo Black's Vision of the Lawyer, the First Amendment, and the Duty of the Judiciary: the Bar Applicant Cases in a National Security State
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 20 (2011-2012) Issue 3 Article 3 March 2012 Hugo Black's Vision of the Lawyer, the First Amendment, and the Duty of the Judiciary: The Bar Applicant Cases in a National Security State Joshua E. Kastenberg Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Repository Citation Joshua E. Kastenberg, Hugo Black's Vision of the Lawyer, the First Amendment, and the Duty of the Judiciary: The Bar Applicant Cases in a National Security State, 20 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 691 (2012), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol20/iss3/3 Copyright c 2012 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj HUGO BLACK’S VISION OF THE LAWYER, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THE DUTY OF THE JUDICIARY: THE BAR APPLICANT CASES IN A NATIONAL SECURITY STATE Joshua E. Kastenberg* INTRODUCTION .................................................691 I. THE COURT AND ATTORNEY GOVERNANCE ........................698 II. THE COURT, THE COLD WAR, AND CHALLENGES TO THE HISTORIC MODEL OF ATTORNEY GOVERNANCE ...................................712 A. Anticommunist Legislation .................................715 B. Federal Law on Economic Regulation and the Criminalization of Speech ...............................................718 C. Dennis v. United States....................................721 D. The Court Under Attack ...................................727 E. United States v. Sacher....................................728 F. In re Isserman ...........................................738 G. Other Prosecutions: Black’s Fears of a Double Standard .........742 1. Rosenberg Trial ......................................743 2. Cammer v. United States ...............................744 H. State Loyalty Programs Affecting Public Employment ............745 III.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE of JUDGE LEARNED HAND: What Endures and Why?
    THE HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDGE LEARNED HAND: What Endures and Why? Edward A. Purcell, Jr.* The 100th anniversary of Judge Learned Hand’s opinion in Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten1 invites us to look back on its author’s long career and to consider his contributions to American law and his significance in the nation’s history. Spanning more than fifty years from the presidency of William Howard Taft to the presidency of John F. Kennedy, Hand’s judicial career presents an exceptionally rich subject for such reflection. INTRODUCTION As Gerald Gunther’s massive biography2 and Constance Jordan’s edition of his letters3 make clear, Learned Hand’s life merits scholarly attention for any number of reasons. An unusual personal psychology, friendships with major historical figures, social and political involvements, extensive law reform efforts, highly regarded essays and speeches, insightful and controversial ideas about democracy, and valuable contemporaneous commentaries on the people and events of his day all warrant general interest.4 In revealing ways Hand’s life and activities track the course of the nation’s history through the first half of the twentieth century. Richard Posner surely betrayed the narrowest of professional, and perhaps judicial, * Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor, New York Law School. I thank the participants in this symposium for comments on a shorter oral presentation and my colleagues at the New York Law School Faculty Colloquium for comments on an earlier and much longer version of this paper. I also thank Jethro K. Lieberman for his careful reading, Michael McCarthy for his invaluable help in obtaining source material, and research assistants Hyun-Soo Lim at the Yale Law School and Daniel Martorelli at New York Law School for their research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover-Image Not Available
    Great American Judges AN ENCYCLOPEDIA Great American Judges AN ENCYCLOPEDIA v olume one a–k John R. Vile Foreword by Kermit L. Hall Santa Barbara, California Denver, Colorado Oxford, England Copyright 2003 by John R. Vile All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Great American judges : an encyclopedia / [edited by] John R. Vile. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-57607-989-9 (hardcover : alk. paper) — ISBN 1-57607-990-2 (e-book) 1. Judges—United States—Biography—Encyclopedias. I. Vile, John. R. KF8775.A68G64 2003 347.73' 14' 0922—dc21 2003004203 07 06 05 04 03 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an e-book. Visit abc-clio.com for details. ABC-CLIO, Inc. 130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911 Santa Barbara, California 93116-1911 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Manufactured in the United States of America Dedicated to those individuals throughout American history who have used their positions as judges and justices to perpetuate constitutional government and equal justice under the law Contents List of Sidebars xiii Foreword, Kermit L. Hall xvii Introduction, John R. Vile xxi Special Acknowledgments xlv v olume one Shirley Schlanger Abrahamson (1933– ), Jennifer Harrison 1 Florence Ellinwood Allen (1884–1966), Angela White 8 Samuel Ames (1806–1865), Henry B.
    [Show full text]