Ferguson Genealogy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ferguson Genealogy Ferguson Genealogy Descendants of Henry Ferguson Dunfanaghy, Co. Donegal, Ireland Dulcius ex asperis “Sweeter after difficulty” Crest and Coat of Arms (Printing/Update timestamp 17 Jan 2014 07:25:14 EST) © 2006/2014 Neil S. Ferguson 17 January 2014 Page 1 17 January 2014 Modified Register for Alexander FERGUSON Page 2 Table of Contents Forward 5 Beginnings… 8 Original Immigrants 12 First Generation 26 Second Generation 29 Alexander Ferguson Descendants 36 Thomas Ferguson Descendants 201 John Ferguson Descendants 260 Illustrations 438 The Saga of “The Ledger” 441 The Question of Scottish Heritage and DNA Analysis 446 Name Index 450 17 January 2014 Modified Register for Alexander FERGUSON Page 3 17 January 2014 Modified Register for Alexander FERGUSON Page 4 Forward Why write a family history book? Should several hundred pages be written about an “ordinary” family, even if the family isn’t or wasn’t “famous”? Can’t we just pass along the stories of our family history by telling them to our descendants? Not always. Family history was something that was rarely discussed in the family as this author was growing up. This is not meant to imply that the family wasn’t a close or loving family. It was very close and loving in many respects. Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays were filled with many a family gathering and they were events that were looked forward to. There were occasions, of course, when someone in this author’s grandparents’ generation would tell a story or two about their earlier life experiences, but, as happens in many families, there was little effort to write very much down or record that story in some other way. What little information that was written down was sketchy, at best. Also, most of it was simply written on sheets of tablet paper or was typewritten on one or two sheets of stationery. Sometimes, a sheet with a few birth dates for some great aunts and great uncles were about all that was listed – and very few narrative stories were included. But other relatives in other branches of the family tree had additional information to add, and other people who did write about their family history provided a good deal of historical information that helped fill in some of the missing pieces. This helps provide a reason for such a book. If one still wonders about why, given that no one so far seems to be exceedingly famous, remember that our family story is still evolving. Who knows whether a future descendant might become famous? All we need is a starting point… To collect information fo a family history, we could try starting with the living descendants, but this does not really go back very far. Any direct knowledge of the family history prior to the birth of our oldest living ancestor would have to come from written records or some other kind of physical documentation. Stories recalled from parents or grandparents are certainly helpful, but if those ancestors did not somehow record this history, the direct knowledge of family history and events perishes upon their deaths. For example, this author was born in 1953. In the 1950’s and 1960’s, it was quite rare to have, for instance, tape recorders around for someone to use that would allow someone to preserve the family’s stories. Certainly there were no video cassette recorders at that time, either. Even those who might have made a recording or two would have to be careful to keep it safe from the perils of potential damage. Moisture, heat and age all contribute to the disintegration of recorded material on most non- digital media. Any family history recorded on such media can be easily lost if the player snaps an old and brittle tape. A book is perhaps a better solution, but even then, the assumption is that there should be several copies in existence so that at least one can survive certain events -- such as fires, floods, tornadoes or an accidental toss into a trash basket that ends up with a trip to a landfill somewhere. As of 2008, this author’s grandparents have been gone for over twenty five years. Three of the four have been gone more than thirty years; all dying within eighteen months of each other. The direct knowledge about the family history that they carried but which was never recorded is now gone forever. Some of their stories still survive because they are retold by their descendants. However, it is easy to begin to lose track of certain details. Before too long, the entire story is forgotten. When you are young, it is seemingly rare for a young person to take the time to talk about past life experiences with Grandma or Grandpa. Even rarer, it seems, is a grandparent or parent who takes the time to write down some of those stories. Now that this author has grandchildren of his own, it is hoped that this unfortunate circumstance will not be repeated. Hopefully, this book will be something that can be referenced in the future for anyone who cares to find out more about our Ferguson heritage. 17 January 2014 Modified Register for Alexander FERGUSON Page 5 - Gathering this data has been a quest, of sorts, since the process of documenting any family history is an on-going process. As long as life events keep occurring, there will always be new information to record. As the text describes later, this book started out as a search for descendants of John Ferguson. The discovery and documenting of John’s parents was accomplished fairly early. But along with this came the discovery of John’s siblings. With the virtual explosion of data that became available through electronic means during the late twentieth and early twentifirst century, it was possible to find connections to family that probably would otherwise have been forever undiscovered. We must give credit to at least two significant genealogists who took the time to record what they knew. One was a descendant of John’s older brother, Thomas. The other was a descendant of Thomas’ older brother, Alexander. Discovering that they each had written books, obtaining a copy and being given permission to include their work is worthy of an incredible “Thank you!” Because of this author’s experience working in data processing, it was natural for an electronic copy of the family information database to be posted on the web, too. It was hoped that someone else who might be searching for their distant family would also find a connection. If luck was on our side, this person would have information that was previously unknown. In the spring of 2008, this is precisely what happened when not one, but two descendants who were otherwise unknown found records of their connection to the family. Each was able to add valuable information to our records. There are probably more descendants “out there” somewhere. Perhaps we will someday be able to include them with the rest of the family, too. In August 2013, even more Ferguson family was “discovered” when Wayne Thomas Ferguson of Louisville, KY emailed the author with news that his Y-DNA analysis turned out to be an extremely close match to the marker data that the author filed with the Fergus(s)on DNA Project in 2006. As we each pieced together the pieces of the family history that we knew, we were able to determine that Wayne’s 3 rd -great grandfather, Benjamin Ferguson, was the son of Alexander and Mary “Polly” (McNutt) Ferguson. Alexander is one of the three sons of Henry and Margaret Ferguson from whom we can currently trace living descendants. If you are reading this Forward for the first time, have a connection to the family and have additional information, it is hoped that you will seek out someone who can add your knowledge to this publication. Besides just adding the basic date and place data for people that you know about, consider taking the time also write down a few paragraphs about your own immediate family’s history. Consider writing about what your typical school day was like when you were young. What may seem “typical” or “ordinary” to you now may just be the source of significant fascination by some future great-grandchild or great-great-grandchild. Regretably, none of this author’s grandparents kept a diary, it seems. Had even one of them done so, or had even one of this author’s eight great-grandparents done so, it might have included notes about what was seemingly mundane to them. However, being able to read about their “typical” or “ordinary” day would be a wonderful way to keep their heritage “alive.” Long after someone has passed on, and long after the advances of science and technology have forever changed what daily life was like, a diary would be a veritable gold mine of family history information for someone to be able to read. If you have photos of parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, etc., try to find someone who can assist with having them digitized and included. If you are already “computer savvy” and can digitize them yourself, even better. Surely one of the greatest benefits to having a photo scanned and digitized is that the image will never be subject to weathering, fading, or damage by fire or water. Photos that have 17 January 2014 Modified Register for Alexander FERGUSON Page 6 already suffered damage can often be repaired; recovering or nearly recovering what was originally there. Home movies can also be transferred to digital images, along with video cassette recordings.
Recommended publications
  • NOT RECOMMENDED for FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 18A0441n.06
    Case: 16-2215 Document: 42-2 Filed: 08/24/2018 Page: 1 App. 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 18a0441n.06 No. 16-2215 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Aug 24, 2018 MARY DANIELAK, ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE v. ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN SHAWN BREWER, ) DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) Respondent-Appellee. ) OPINION ) BEFORE: NORRIS, ROGERS, and BUSH, Circuit Judges. ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. Mary Danielak appeals the district court’s judgment denying her petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner helped a friend purchase heroin. The friend died after using it. Petitioner then participated in an attempted cover-up of the death. A jury subsequently convicted her of aiding and abetting the following crimes: (1) delivery of a controlled substance, causing death, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.317a; (2) common law obstruction of justice, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.505; (3) tampering with evidence, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.483a(5)(a); and (4) removing a body without the permission of a medical examiner, Mich. Comp. Laws § 52.204. Petitioner unsuccessfully appealed the verdict. People v. Danielak, No. 305491, 2012 WL 6913789 (Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 20, 2012); People v. Danielak, 830 N.W.2d 139 (Mich. 2013) (denying application for leave to appeal). Case: 16-2215 Document: 42-2 Filed: 08/24/2018 Page: 2 App. 2 Thereafter she filed a pro se § 2254 petition, which raised the following claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient
    [Show full text]
  • Outline Descendant Report for Thomas Marvel Jr
    Outline Descendant Report for Thomas Marvel Jr. 1 Thomas Marvel Jr. b: 11 Nov 1732 in Stepney Parish, Somerset County, Maryland, d: 15 Dec 1801 in Dover, Kent County, Delaware + Susannah Rodney b: 1742 in Sussex County, Delaware, m: Sussex County, Delaware, d: 1797 in Sussex County, Delaware ...2 Thomas Marvel III b: 08 Mar 1761, d: 1801 + Nancy Knowles b: 1765 in Sussex County, Delaware, d: 1820 in Sussex County, Delaware ......3 James W. Marvel b: 1780 in Sussex County, Delaware, d: 13 Dec 1840 in Concord, Sussex, Delaware + Margaret Marvel b: 1781 in Broad Creek Hundred, Sussex, Delaware, m: 1808 in Sussex County, Delaware, d: 1850 in Seaford, Sussex County, Delaware .........4 Caldwell Windsor Marvel b: 21 Aug 1809, d: 15 Nov 1848 in Seaford, Sussex County, Delaware + Elizabeth Lynch b: 10 Apr 1807 in Sussex County, Delaware, m: 05 Jul 1837 in Sussex County, Delaware, d: 10 Mar 1869 in Sussex County, Delaware ............5 William Thomas Marvel b: 12 Aug 1838 in Millsboro, Sussex, Delaware, d: 21 Jan 1914 in Lewes, Sussex County, Delaware + Mary Julia Carpenter b: 1842 in Delaware, m: 08 Sep 1861, d: 1880 ...............6 Ida F. Marvel b: Aug 1868 in Delaware + Frank J. Jones b: Feb 1867 in Virginia, m: 1891 ..................7 Anna W Jones b: Feb 1892 in Delaware ..................7 William A Jones b: Nov 1894 in Delaware ..................7 Alverta W Jones b: Dec 1898 in Delaware ..................7 James F Jones b: 1901 in Delaware ...............6 Charles H. Marvel b: 1873 in Delaware ...............6 William Thomas Marvel Jr. b: 22 Nov 1875 in Wilmington, Delaware, d: 17 Aug 1956 in Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Age: 81 + Mary G Laubmeister b: Feb 1881 in Germany, m: 1900 in New Jersey ..................7 Margaret E Marvel b: 1902 in New Jersey, USA ..................7 Edward W Marvel b: 31 Oct 1904 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, d: 02 Jul 1963 in Cheltenham, Montgomery, Pennsylvania; Age: 58 + Mary G McMenamin b: Abt.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of John Lathey
    Descendants of John Lathey Prepared by: Thomas N. Oatney Table of Contents Descendants of John Lathey 1 First Generation 1 Second Generation 1 Third Generation 1 Fourth Generation 4 Fifth Generation 15 Sixth Generation 39 Seventh Generation 73 Eighth Generation 98 Ninth Generation 110 Tenth Generation 118 Name Index 120 Produced by: Thomas Oatney tom @ oatney . org : 24 Mar 2021 Descendants of John Lathey First Generation 1. John Lathey was born about 1750 in Ulster, Northern Ireland and died before Mar 1810 in Fauquier County, VA. John married Susannah Burton on an unknown date. Susannah was born in 1783 in Fauquier County, VA and died in 1853 in Athens County, OH at age 70. Children from this marriage were: + 2 M i. William Lathey was born about 1783 in Fauquier County, VA, died in May 1826 in Athens County, OH about age 43, and was buried in Pageville Cemetery, Pageville, Meigs County, OH. 3 F ii. Betsy Lathey was born about 1785 in Fauquier County, VA and died on an unknown date. Betsy married John Sudduth on 8 Mar 1806 in Fauquier County, VA. John was born about 1785 in Fauquier County, VA and died on an unknown date. Second Generation (Children) 2. William Lathey (John 1) was born about 1783 in Fauquier County, VA, died in May 1826 in Athens County, OH about age 43, and was buried in Pageville Cemetery, Pageville, Meigs County, OH. William married Elizabeth "Betsy" Hudnall, daughter of Thomas Hudnall and Mary Ann Strickler, on 13 Jan 1806 in Fauquier County, VA. Elizabeth was born about 1783 in Fauquier County, VA, died on 15 Feb 1853 in Athens County, OH about age 70, and was buried in Pageville Cemetery, Pageville, Meigs County, OH.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHIGAN Muskegon-1612
    MICHIGAN Muskegon-1612 $586,000; expenditures, $1,466,786, services; and training in and improving Officers: Ruth R. Mott,• President; including $1,394, 169 for 43 grants (high: practices of leadership. Pioneer in Margaret Stewart,• Secretary; George L. $1,000,000; low: $200). community education concept. No grants Whyel,• Treasurer; James R. Kettler, Officers and Trustees: Robert B. Miller, to individuals or for building or Executive Director. President; W. James McQuiston, Vice- endowment funds, research, or Trustees:• Sarah R. Molla,• Chair; Norman President; Fred M . Woodruff, Jr., scholarships and fellowships. Report Cousins, Joan M. MacGillivray, Helen Secretary; Arnold Van Zanten, Treasurer; published annually. Milliken, C.S . Harding Mott, Maryanne Arthur W. Angood, Barbara L. Comai, Financial Data (yr. ended 12131 /82): Mott, Stewart R. Mott, Charles B. Webb, Gary E. Costley, Allen L. Miller, Olive T. Assets, $471,298, 929 (M); gifts received, Jr. Miller, Robert B. Miller, Jr. $1,000,000; expenditures, $26,910,794, Write: James R. Kettler, Executive Director. Write: Robert B. Miller, President. including $22,938,830 for 361 grants Grant Application Information: Program Grant Application Information: Initial (high: $6,626,000; low: $500) and policy statement and grant application approach by letter or full proposal; submit $90,520 for 165 matching gifts. guidelines available; initial approach by 10 copies of proposal; application form Officers: William S. White,• President; Ray letter or telephone; application deadlines 7 required; board meets monthly. B. Loeschner, Vice-President and Chief weeks before board meetings; board meets ' Employer Identification No.: 386064925 Administrative Officer; Willard J. Hertz, 3 times a year in February, June, and Vice-President for Program Planning and October.
    [Show full text]
  • PAD-81-08 States' Experience with Beverage Container Deposit Laws
    . * 6 . I ’ REPORTBY THE Comptroller General Ok THE UNITEDSTATES States’Experience With Beverage dontainer Deposit laws shows Positive Benefits In Irecent years, several States have enacted la@s requiring refundable deposits on beverage containers. Using data based on the experience of Four states--Maine, Michigan, Oregon, and Vermont--GAO updated its 1977 estimates of the impact of a nationwide mandatory deposit lavj. As/ in 1977, GAO estimates that litter, solid wabte, and energy and raw material use would be j reduced. Some industry costs would rise, deposit-related revenue would also in- 113944 itter and solid waste are fairly es of a mandatory deposit law. potential magnitude of other Ions in energy and raw material mption and increases in industry costs-- ds on consumer and industry reaction types of containers bought and sold. PAD-81 -08 DECEMBER 11,198O For sale by: Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Telephone (202) 783-3238 Members of Congress; heads of Federal, State, and local government agencies; members of the press; and libraries can obtain GAO documents from: U.S. General Accounting Office Document Handling and Information Services Facility P.O. Box 6015 Gaithersbur#, Md. 20760 Telephone (202) 2756241 COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON D.C. 20548 B-200893 The Honorable Mark 0. Hatfield United States Senate The Honorable Bob Packwood United States Senate You asked that we update our 1977 study of the effects of a national beverage container deposit law. To do this, we have studied the experiences of Maine and Michigan, both having only recently implemented such a law, and we have examined recent developments in the beverage market nation- wide.
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Archeology Program: the Earliest Americans Theme Study
    NPS Archeology Program: The Earliest Americans Theme Study A, B, C, D sections F. associated property G. geographical data types E. statement of historic H. summary of contexts introduction identification and Anderson, Brose, evaluation methods introduction Dincauze, Shott, Grumet, Anderson, Brose, Waldbauer project history Dincauze, Shott, Grumet, Robert S. Grumet Waldbauer southeast property types David G. Anderson acknowledgments southeast context David G. Anderson northeast property types I. major bibliographical Dena F. Dincauze references northeast context Dena F. Dincauze midwest property types references cited Michael J. Shott midwest context Figures and Tables Michael J. Shott Credits DOI | History & Culture | Search | Contact | FOIA | Privacy | Disclaimer | USA.gov Last updated: EJL/MDC http://www.cr.nps.gov/archeology/PUBS/NHLEAM/index.htm[2/26/2013 2:15:10 PM] NPS Archeology Program: The Earliest Americans Theme Study A, B, C, D sections NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 E. statement of historic (March 1992) contexts F. associated property United States Department of the Interior types National Park Service G. geographical data National Register of Historic Places H. summary of Multiple Property Documentation Form identification and evaluation methods This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National I. major bibliographical references Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering
    [Show full text]
  • The Criminal Justice System: the Impact of Legal and Extra-Legal Variables
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 12-1991 The Criminal Justice System: The Impact of Legal and Extra-Legal Variables Sanderson Charles Jeter Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Jeter, Sanderson Charles, "The Criminal Justice System: The Impact of Legal and Extra-Legal Variables" (1991). Dissertations. 2004. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/2004 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: THE IMPACT OF LEGAL AND EXTRA-LEGAL VARIABLES by Sanderson Charles Jeter A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December 1991 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: THE IMPACT OF LEGAL AND EXTRA-LEGAL VARIABLES Sanderson Charles Jeter, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 1991 This dissertation examines the effect of legal and extra-legal variables on the processing and sentencing outcomes of defendants. The data for this study were extracted from the case files of Kalamazoo (Michigan) County Circuit Court. The sample population is comprised of criminal defendants randomly selected and who were processed in the cir­ cuit court from May, 1987 through May, 1988.
    [Show full text]