DOCSLIB.ORG

Community-Acquired Pneumonia – Frequently Asked Questions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community-Acquired Pneumonia – Frequently Asked Questions Community-Acquired Pneumonia – Frequently Asked Questions In outpatient CAP in healthy patients without comorbidities, why are azithromycin and doxycycline monotherapy no longer recommended? Per the 2019 SHC Antibiogram, macrolide and tetracycline resistance in S. pneumoniae is 44% and 42%, respectively.1 Negative clinical outcomes like breakthrough bacteremia have been shown in patients with erythromycin-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia receiving macrolide therapy.2,3 The 2019 ATS/IDSA CAP Guidelines recommend avoidance of macrolide monotherapy when local pneumococcal resistance rates exceed 25%.4 While the guidelines do not address a local threshold for S. pneumoniae tetracycline (doxycycline) resistance directly, the SHC resistance rate (42%) varies so substantially from the 2017 U.S. national average (11%) that an empiric recommendation cannot be justified.1,4,5 In outpatient CAP in healthy patients without comorbidities, why is amoxicillin monotherapy recommended, which does not have “atypical” coverage? Multiple prospective, randomized studies have demonstrated equivalent efficacy of high dose amoxicillin to antimicrobials with atypical coverage including fluoroquinolones and ketolides in patients with CAP.6–8 Meta-analyses of these and other studies comparing beta lactams with macrolides or fluoroquinolones also demonstrated no differences in clinical success and mortality, particularly in healthy outpatients with CAP.9 Additionally, per the 2018 SHC Antibiogram, using penicillin as a surrogate, amoxicillin susceptibility amongst S. pneumoniae is very high at 98%.1 Why is Healthcare Associated Pneumonia (HCAP) no longer a recognized clinical entity? The term ‘HCAP’ was initially coined based on studies showing a higher prevalence of organisms like MRSA and P. aeruginosa in certain subsets of patient with CAP (e.g. dialysis, nursing home residence, recent hospitalization, home infusion therapy, home wound care). In prior pneumonia guidelines, broader spectrum therapy was recommended in patients who met any of these HCAP criteria. However, more recent meta-analyses of subsequent studies showed poor discriminatory ability of the HCAP criteria to detect MRSA and P. aeruginosa, no increase in mortality of HCAP, and significant publication bias and low study quality.10 Numerous studies have also shown no difference in outcomes when using standard CAP therapy compared with broader spectrum therapy with anti-pseudomonal and MRSA activity in aggregate11,12, as well as subsets of non-severe disease or non-ICU patients13,14 and critically ill patients15. See below for when empiric MRSA or P. aeruginosa-directed therapy should be considered. What is the evidence behind when empiric MRSA or Pseudomonas coverage should be considered? Overall, incidence of MRSA and P. aeruginosa in CAP is low.16–19 The strongest predictor of MRSA or P. aeruginosa is prior isolation of these organisms from respiratory culture.16,18,19 The 2019 ATS/IDSA CAP guidelines recommend empirically covering MRSA or P. aeruginosa, respectively, if these organisms have been isolated from respiratory cultures in the past 12 months.4 Receipt of broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics during hospitalization was also identified as a predictor of MRSA and P. aeruginosa but its association is weaker, thus the 2019 ATS/IDSA CAP guidelines recommend only empirically covering these organisms in severe CAP, otherwise respiratory cultures should be obtained and MRSA or P. aeruginosa coverage added only if these organisms are isolated.4,19 Other less strongly associated risk factors for MRSA include recurrent skin infections18 and severe disease.18 For P. aeruginosa they include tracheostomy16, bronchiectasis16, severe COPD16, and invasive respiratory or vasopressor support16. If antimicrobials for MRSA and/or P. aeruginosa are initiated, blood and respiratory cultures as well as nasal MRSA PCR screen should be performed and if these assays do not identify these pathogens, therapy can be narrowed.4 Why do patients with suspected aspiration pneumonia (without radiographic evidence of lung abscess or empyema) no longer need additional anaerobic coverage? While more definitive research is needed in this area, the origins of needing anaerobic coverage (e.g. adding metronidazole) were based on studies of aspiration pneumonia using trans-tracheal aspiration in patients late in their disease course finding high rates of anaerobic organisms.20,21 More recent studies have found that gram negative aerobic organisms are more common and anaerobes play less of a role.22,23 Additionally, what may initially be diagnosed as aspiration pneumonia could instead be aspiration pneumonitis, a non-infectious syndrome, in which patients improve rapidly and antimicrobials do not affect outcome.24,25 Thus, the 2019 ATS/IDSA CAP Guidelines do not recommend adding anaerobic coverage for aspiration pneumonia unless radiographic evidence of lung abscess or empyema exist.4 When discharging a patient with CAP, given potential insurance formulary challenges, can other cephalosporins like cefdinir or cefixime be substituted? The 2019 ATS/IDSA CAP Guidelines only recommend cefpodoxime and cefuroxime as oral cephalosporin options in the treatment of CAP along with amoxicillin/clavulanate.4 Cefdinir does carry an FDA indication for CAP and its use is supported by a prospective randomized controlled trial at a dosage of 300 mg PO BID, where it achieved 89% clinical cure.26,27 While inclusion criteria were not as stringent as modern CAP trials and duration of therapy was 10 days, on subgroup analysis, cefdinir did demonstrate high cure rates (85-100%) in culture-positive pneumonia with S. pneumoniae, M. catarrhalis, H. influenzae, and H. parainfluenzae supporting its efficacy.27 Cefixime is another commonly used oral 3rd generation cephalosporin, however, it does not carry an FDA indication for pneumonia and clinical studies supporting its use are of poor quality.28 What is the appropriate treatment duration of CAP? Several randomized controlled trials have demonstrated similar efficacy with 5 days (or less) of antibiotic therapy to longer courses (8-10 days).29–31 The 2019 ATS/IDSA CAP Guidelines recommend that in patients with CAP with clinical improvement (i.e. resolution of vital sign abnormalities, normal mentation, ability to eat), treatment should be no less than 5 days. In patients who do not stabilize by day 5 of treatment should be evaluated for drug-resistant pathogens, complications of pneumonia, or other sources of infection/inflammatory response. Duration of therapy should be extended to 7 days in patients with documented MRSA or P. aeruginosa pneumonia and duration should be extended appropriately if pneumonia is complicated by meningitis, endocarditis, or other deep-seated infection or caused by other less common pathogens (e.g. M tuberculosis or endemic fungi).4 Can azithromycin be discontinued after 3 days of therapy at 500 mg daily? Multiple randomized studies of atypical pneumonia and CAP, demonstrated similar treatment efficacy between 3 days of azithromycin (500 mg PO daily) compared with both 5 days of azithromycin (500 mg PO on day 1 followed by 250 mg PO on days 2-5)32 and 8 days of clarithromycin33. In patients with CAP and rapid clinical improvement on therapy with a beta lactam and azithromycin 500 mg daily, azithromycin can be safety discontinued after 3 doses, while the beta lactam can be continued for at least 5 total days of therapy as above. 1. Banaei N, Watz N, Getsinger D, Ghafghaichi L. Stanford Health Care Antibiogram 2019. 2019. 2. Lonks JR, Garau J, Gomez L, et al. Failure of Macrolide Antibiotic Treatment in Patients with Bacteremia Due to Erythromycin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(5):556-564. 3. Daneman N, McGeer A, Green K, Low DE. Macrolide Resistance in Bacteremic Pneumococcal Disease: Implications for Patient Management. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(4):432-438. 4. Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community- acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(7):e45-e67. doi:10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST 5. ABCs 2017 Strep Pneumoniae Report | CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/abcs/reports- findings/survreports/spneu17.html. Published April 5, 2019. Accessed February 27, 2020. 6. Aubier M, Verster R, Regamey C, Geslin P, Vercken J-B, Group TSES. Once-Daily Sparfloxacin versus High-Dosage Amoxicillin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired, Suspected Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Adults. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(6):1312-1320. 7. Petitpretz P, Arvis P, Marel M, Moita J, Urueta J. Oral Moxifloxacin vs High-Dosage Amoxicillin in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate, Community-Acquired, Suspected Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Adults. Chest. 2001;119(1):185-195. doi:10.1378/chest.119.1.185 8. Hagberg L, Torres A, van Rensburg D, Leroy B, Rangaraju M, Ruuth E. Efficacy and Tolerability of Once-Daily Telithromycin Compared with High-Dose Amoxicillin for Treatment of Community- Acquired Pneumonia. Infection. 2002;30(6):378-386. doi:10.1007/s15010-002-2096-z 9. Maimon N, Nopmaneejumruslers C, Marras TK. Antibacterial class is not obviously important in outpatient pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2008;31(5):1068-1076. doi:10.1183/09031936.00109007 10. Chalmers JD, Rother C, Salih W, Ewig S. Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia Does Not Accurately Identify Potentially Resistant Pathogens: A Systematic Review
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Etiology of Pulmonary Abscess
    University of Nebraska Medical Center DigitalCommons@UNMC MD Theses Special Collections 5-1-1933 Etiology of pulmonary abscess Lucien Sears University of Nebraska Medical Center This manuscript is historical in nature and may not reflect current medical research and practice. Search PubMed for current research. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/mdtheses Recommended Citation Sears, Lucien, "Etiology of pulmonary abscess" (1933). MD Theses. 291. https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/mdtheses/291 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at DigitalCommons@UNMC. It has been accepted for inclusion in MD Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNMC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ETIOLOG~ OF PUL~ONARY ABSCESS By Lucien Sears University of Nebraska Medical College • Senior Thesis 1933 "?REFACE The purpose of this paper is to pre- sent so far as possible a modern and ra- tional explanation of the etiology of pul- monary abscess. No attempt has been made, in writing this paper, to include the symptomatology, pathology, diagnosis or therapy of pulmon­ ary abscess. The references were chosen with the idea that they are useful references, that is to say references which I have found use- ful, although for the most part quite recent, they will be found to contain a number of older articles. INTRODUCTION. The term lung abscess has come to be rather loose­ ly applied to a variety of conditions. Strictly speak­ ing it consists of a focus of suppuration within the parenchyma of the lung; but in current literature has come to include suppuration within the bronchial tree and even between apposing pleural surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Legionnaires' Disease
    epi TRENDS A Monthly Bulletin on Epidemiology and Public Health Practice in Washington Legionnaires’ disease Vol. 22 No. 11 Legionellosis is a bacterial respiratory infection which can result in severe pneumonia and death. Most cases are sporadic but legionellosis is an important public health issue because outbreaks can occur in hotels, communities, healthcare facilities, and other settings. Legionellosis Legionellosis was first recognized in 1976 when an outbreak affected 11.17 more than 200 people and caused more than 30 deaths, mainly among attendees of a Legionnaires’ convention being held at a Philadelphia hotel. Legionellosis is caused by numerous different Legionella species and serogroups but most epiTRENDS P.O. Box 47812 recognized infections are due to Olympia, WA 98504-7812 L. pneumophila serogroup 1. The extent to which this is due to John Wiesman, DrPH, MPH testing bias is unclear since only Secretary of Health L. pneumophila serogroup 1 is Kathy Lofy, MD identified via commonly used State Health Officer urine antigen tests; other species Scott Lindquist, MD, MPH Legionella pneumophila multiplying and serogroups must be identified in a human lung cell State Epidemiologist, through PCR or culture, tests Communicable Disease www.cdc.gov which are less commonly ordered. Jerrod Davis, P.E. Assistant Secretary The disease involves two clinically distinct syndromes: Pontiac fever, Disease Control and Health Statistics a self-limited flu-like illness without pneumonia; and Legionnaires’ disease, a potentially fatal pneumonia with initial symptoms of fever, Sherryl Terletter Managing Editor cough, myalgias, malaise, and sometimes diarrhea progressing to symptoms of pneumonia which can be severe. Health conditions that Marcia J.
    [Show full text]
  • Pneumonia: Prevention and Care at Home
    FACT SHEET FOR PATIENTS AND FAMILIES Pneumonia: Prevention and Care at Home What is it? On an x-ray, pneumonia usually shows up as Pneumonia is an infection of the lungs. The infection white areas in the affected part of your lung(s). causes the small air sacs in your lungs (called alveoli) to swell and fill up with fluid or pus. This makes it harder for you to breathe, and usually causes coughing and other symptoms that sap your energy and appetite. How common and serious is it? Pneumonia is fairly common in the United States, affecting about 4 million people a year. Although for many people infection can be mild, about 1 out of every 5 people with pneumonia needs to be in the heart hospital. Pneumonia is most serious in these people: • Young children (ages 2 years and younger) • Older adults (ages 65 and older) • People with chronic illnesses such as diabetes What are the symptoms? and heart disease Pneumonia symptoms range in severity, and often • People with lung diseases such as asthma, mimic the symptoms of a bad cold or the flu: cystic fibrosis, or emphysema • Fatigue (feeling tired and weak) • People with weakened immune systems • Cough, without or without mucus • Smokers and heavy drinkers • Fever over 100ºF or 37.8ºC If you’ve been diagnosed with pneumonia, you should • Chills, sweats, or body aches take it seriously and follow your doctor’s advice. If your • Shortness of breath doctor decides you need to be in the hospital, you will receive more information on what to expect with • Chest pain or pain with breathing hospital care.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Pneumonia: the Great Radiological Mimicker
    Duzgun et al. Insights Imaging (2020) 11:118 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00933-z Insights into Imaging EDUCATIONAL REVIEW Open Access COVID-19 pneumonia: the great radiological mimicker Selin Ardali Duzgun* , Gamze Durhan, Figen Basaran Demirkazik, Meltem Gulsun Akpinar and Orhan Macit Ariyurek Abstract Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has rapidly spread worldwide since December 2019. Although the reference diagnostic test is a real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), chest-computed tomography (CT) has been frequently used in diagnosis because of the low sensitivity rates of RT-PCR. CT fndings of COVID-19 are well described in the literature and include predominantly peripheral, bilateral ground-glass opacities (GGOs), combination of GGOs with consolida- tions, and/or septal thickening creating a “crazy-paving” pattern. Longitudinal changes of typical CT fndings and less reported fndings (air bronchograms, CT halo sign, and reverse halo sign) may mimic a wide range of lung patholo- gies radiologically. Moreover, accompanying and underlying lung abnormalities may interfere with the CT fndings of COVID-19 pneumonia. The diseases that COVID-19 pneumonia may mimic can be broadly classifed as infectious or non-infectious diseases (pulmonary edema, hemorrhage, neoplasms, organizing pneumonia, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, sarcoidosis, pulmonary infarction, interstitial lung diseases, and aspiration pneumonia). We summarize the imaging fndings of COVID-19 and the aforementioned lung pathologies that COVID-19 pneumonia may mimic. We also discuss the features that may aid in the diferential diagnosis, as the disease continues to spread and will be one of our main diferential diagnoses some time more.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiation of Lung Cancer, Empyema, and Abscess Through the Investigation of a Dry Cough
    Open Access Case Report DOI: 10.7759/cureus.896 Differentiation of Lung Cancer, Empyema, and Abscess Through the Investigation of a Dry Cough Brittany Urso 1 , Scott Michaels 1, 2 1. College of Medicine, University of Central Florida 2. FM Medical, Inc. Corresponding author: Brittany Urso, [email protected] Abstract An acute dry cough results commonly from bronchitis or pneumonia. When a patient presents with signs of infection, respiratory crackles, and a positive chest radiograph, the diagnosis of pneumonia is more common. Antibiotic failure in a patient being treated for community-acquired pneumonia requires further investigation through chest computed tomography. If a lung mass is found on chest computed tomography, lung empyema, abscess, and cancer need to be included on the differential and managed aggressively. This report describes a 55-year-old Caucasian male, with a history of obesity, recovered alcoholism, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension, presenting with an acute dry cough in the primary care setting. The patient developed signs of infection and was found to have a lung mass on chest computed tomography. Treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam and chest tube placement did not resolve the mass, so treatment with thoracotomy and lobectomy was required. It was determined through surgical investigation that the patient, despite having no risk factors, developed a lung abscess. Lung abscesses rarely form in healthy middle-aged individuals making it an unlikely cause of the patient's presenting symptom, dry cough. The patient cleared his infection with proper management and only suffered minor complications of mild pneumoperitoneum and pneumothorax during his hospitalization. Categories: Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery, Infectious Disease, Pulmonology Keywords: lung abscess, empyema, lung infection, pneumonia, thoracotomy, lobectomy, pulmonology, respiratory infections Introduction Determining the etiology of an acute dry cough can be an easy diagnosis such as bronchitis or pneumonia; however, it can also develop from other etiologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Obliterative Bronchiolitis, Cryptogenic Organising Pneumonitis and Bronchiolitis Obliterans Organizing Pneumonia: Three Names for Two Different Conditions
    Eur Reaplr J EDITORIAL 1991, 4, 774-775 Obliterative bronchiolitis, cryptogenic organising pneumonitis and bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia: three names for two different conditions R.M. du Bois, O.M. Geddes Over the last five years, increasing confusion has has been applied to conditions in which airflow obstruc­ developed over the use of the terms "bronchiolitis tion is prominent and in which response to treatment is obliterans" and "bronchiolitis obliterans organizing poor. pneumonia". The confusion stems largely from the common use of the term "bronchiolitis obliterans" or "obliterative bronchiolitis" in the diagnostic labels applied "Cryptogenic organizing pneumonitis" or "bronchi· to two entities which are quite distinct clinically but which otitis obliterans organizing pneumonia" (BOOP) bear certain resemblances histologically. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonitis was first described by DAVISON et al. [7] in 1983. The clinical syndrome ObUterative bronchiolitis consisted of breathlessness, malaise, fever, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), pneumonic In 1977, GEODES et al. [1] reported the case histories shadowing on chest radiograph with a restrictive of six patients whose clinical condition was characterized pulmonary function defect and low gas transfer coeffi­ by airways obliteration in association with rheumatoid cient. On histological examination of lung biopsy mate· arthritis. The striking clinical features were of rapidly rial, the typical and distinguishing feature was the progressive breathlessness and the fmding on examination presence of connective tissue within the alveoli, alveolar of a high-pitched mid-inspiratory squeak heard over the ducts and, occasionally, in respiratory bronchioles. This lung fields. Chest radiographs showed hyperinflated lungs connective tissue consisted of "loosely woven fibres of but were otherwise normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizing Pneumonia As a Histopathological Term
    Turk Thorac J 2017; 18: 82-7 DOI: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2017.16047 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Organizing Pneumonia as a Histopathological Term Fatma Tokgöz Akyıl1, Meltem Ağca1, Aysun Mısırlıoğlu2, Ayşe Alp Arsev3, Mustafa Akyıl2, Tülin Sevim1 1Clinif of Chest Diseases, Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey 2Clinif of Chest Surgery, Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey 3Clinif of Pathology, Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey Cite this article as: Tokgöz Akyıl F, Ağca M, Mısırlıoğlu A, et al. Organizing Pneumonia as a Histopathological Term. Turk Thorac J 2017;18:82-7. Abstract OBJECTIVES: Organizing pneumonia (OP) is an interstitial lung disease characterized by granulation tissue buds in alveoli and alveolar ductus, possibly accompanied by bronchiolar involvement. Histopathologically, OP may signify a primary disease and be observed as a contiguous disease or as a minor component of other diseases. In this study, the clinical significance of histopathological OP lesions and clinical and radiological features of patients with primary OP were examined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and January 2015, of 6,346 lung pathology reports, 138 patients with OP lesions were retrospectively evaluated. According to the final diagnoses, patients were grouped as reactive OP (those with final diagnosis other than OP) and primary OP (those with OP). Patients with primary OP were classified according to etiology as cryptogenic and secondary OP. Radiological evaluation was conducted within a categorization of “typical,” “focal,” and “infiltrative.” RESULTS: Of 138 patients, 25% were males and the mean age was 54±14 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathology of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis
    [Frontiers in Bioscience 8, e110-114, January 1, 2003] PATHOLOGY OF ALLERGIC BRONCHOPULMONARY ASPERGILLOSIS Anne Chetty Department of Pediatrics, Floating Hospital for Children, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. Introduction 3. Immunopathogenesis 4. Pathologic Findings 4.1. Plastic bronchitis 4.2. Allergic fungal sinusitis 4.3. ABPA in cystic fibrosis 5. Acknowledgement 6. References 1. ABSTRACT Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) individuals with episodic obstructive lung diseases such as occurs in patients with asthma and cystic fibrosis when asthma and cystic fibrosis that produce thick, tenacious Aspergillus fumigatus spores are inhaled and grow in sputum. bronchial mucus as hyphae. Chronic colonization of Aspergillus fumigatus and host’s genetically determined Decomposing organic matter serves as a substrate immunological response lead to ABPA. In most cases, for the growth of Aspergillus species. Because biologic lung biopsy is not necessary because the diagnosis is made heating produces temperatures as high as 65° to 70° C, on clinical, serologic, and roentgenographic findings. Some Aspergillus spores will not be recovered in the latter stages patients who have had lung biopsies or partial resections of composting. Aspergillus species have been recovered for atelectasis or infiltrates will have histologic diagnoses. from potting soil, mulches, decaying vegetation, and A number of different histologic diagnoses can be found sewage treatment facilities, as well as in outdoor air and even in the same patient. In the early stages the bronchial Aspergillus spores grow in excreta from birds (1) wall is infiltrated with mononuclear cells and eosinophils. Mucoid impaction and eosinophilic pneumonia are seen Allergic fungal pulmonary disease is manifested subsequently.
    [Show full text]
  • Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Versus Nasogastric Tube Feeding: Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Increases Risk for Pneumonia Requiring Hospital Admission
    nutrients Article Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy versus Nasogastric Tube Feeding: Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Increases Risk for Pneumonia Requiring Hospital Admission Wei-Kuo Chang 1,*, Hsin-Hung Huang 1, Hsuan-Hwai Lin 1 and Chen-Liang Tsai 2 1 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan; [email protected] (H.-H.H.); [email protected] (H.-H.L.) 2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-2-23657137; Fax: +886-2-87927138 Received: 3 November 2019; Accepted: 4 December 2019; Published: 5 December 2019 Abstract: Background: Aspiration pneumonia is the most common cause of death in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding. This study aimed to compare PEG versus NGT feeding regarding the risk of pneumonia, according to the severity of pooling secretions in the pharyngolaryngeal region. Methods: Patients were stratified by endoscopic observation of the pooling secretions in the pharyngolaryngeal region: control group (<25% pooling secretions filling the pyriform sinus), pharyngeal group (25–100% pooling secretions filling the pyriform sinus), and laryngeal group (pooling secretions entering the laryngeal vestibule). Demographic data, swallowing level scale score, and pneumonia requiring hospital admission were recorded. Results: Patients with NGT (n = 97) had a significantly higher incidence of pneumonia (episodes/person-years) than those patients with PEG (n = 130) in the pharyngeal group (3.6 1.0 ± vs. 2.3 2.1, P < 0.001) and the laryngeal group (3.8 0.5 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lung in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY Vol. 70, No. 10, October 2018, pp 1544–1554 DOI 10.1002/art.40574 © 2018, American College of Rheumatology REVIEW The Lung in Rheumatoid Arthritis Focus on Interstitial Lung Disease Paolo Spagnolo,1 Joyce S. Lee,2 Nicola Sverzellati,3 Giulio Rossi,4 and Vincent Cottin5 Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an increasingly and histopathologic features with idiopathic pulmonary recognized complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fibrosis, the most common and severe of the idiopathic and is associated with significant morbidity and mortal- interstitial pneumonias, suggesting the existence of com- ity. In addition, approximately one-third of patients have mon mechanistic pathways and possibly therapeutic tar- subclinical disease with varying degrees of functional gets. There remain substantial gaps in our knowledge of impairment. Although risk factors for RA-related ILD RA-related ILD. Concerted multinational efforts by are well established (e.g., older age, male sex, ever smok- expert centers has the potential to elucidate the basic ing, and seropositivity for rheumatoid factor and anti– mechanisms underlying RA-related UIP and other sub- cyclic citrullinated peptide), little is known about optimal types of RA-related ILD and facilitate the development of disease assessment, treatment, and monitoring, particu- more efficacious and safer drugs. larly in patients with progressive disease. Patients with RA-related ILD are also at high risk of infection and drug toxicity, which, along with comorbidities, compli- Introduction cates further treatment decision-making. There are dis- Pulmonary involvement is a common extraarticular tinct histopathologic patterns of RA-related ILD with manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and occurs, to different clinical phenotypes, natural histories, and prog- some extent, in 60–80% of patients with RA (1,2).
    [Show full text]
  • Legionellosis: Legionnaires' Disease/ Pontiac Fever
    Legionellosis: Legionnaires’ Disease/ Pontiac Fever What is legionellosis? Legionellosis is an infection caused by the bacterium Legionella pneumophila, which acquired its name in 1976 when an outbreak of pneumonia caused by this newly recognized organism occurred among persons attending a convention of the American Legion in Philadelphia. The disease has two distinct forms: • Legionnaires' disease, the more severe form of infection which includes pneumonia, and • Pontiac fever, a milder illness. How common is legionellosis in the United States? An estimated 8,000 to 18,000 people get Legionnaires' disease in the United States each year. Some people can be infected with the Legionella bacterium and have mild symptoms or no illness at all. Outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease receive significant media attention. However, this disease usually occurs as a single isolated case not associated with any recognized outbreak. When outbreaks do occur, they are usually recognized in the summer and early fall, but cases may occur year-round. About 5% to 30% of people who have Legionnaires' disease die. What are the usual symptoms of legionellosis? Patients with Legionnaires' disease usually have fever, chills, and a cough. Some patients also have muscle aches, headache, tiredness, loss of appetite, and, occasionally, diarrhea. Chest X-rays often show pneumonia. It is difficult to distinguish Legionnaires' disease from other types of pneumonia by symptoms alone; other tests are required for diagnosis. Persons with Pontiac fever experience fever and muscle aches and do not have pneumonia. They generally recover in 2 to 5 days without treatment. The time between the patient's exposure to the bacterium and the onset of illness for Legionnaires' disease is 2 to 10 days; for Pontiac fever, it is shorter, generally a few hours to 2 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 20 Pneumonia Facts—2019
    American Thoracic Society Top 20 Pneumonia Facts—2019 1. Pneumonia is an infection of the lung. The lungs fill 12. Antibiotics can be effective for many of the bacteria with fluid and make breathing difficult. Pneumonia that cause pneumonia. For viral causes of pneumonia, disproportionately affects the young, the elderly, and antibiotics are ineffective and should not be used. There are the immunocompromised. It preys on weakness and few or no treatments for most viral causes of pneumonia. vulnerability. 13. Antibiotic resistance is growing amongst the bacteria 2. Pneumonia is the world’s leading cause of death among that cause pneumonia. This often arises from the overuse children under 5 years of age, accounting for 16% of all and misuse of antibiotics in and out of the hospital. New deaths of children under 5 years old killing approximately and more effective antibiotics are urgently needed. 2,400 children a day in 2015. There are 120 million episodes 14. Being on a ventilator raises especially high risk for of pneumonia per year in children under 5, over 10% of serious pneumonia. Ventilator-associated pneumonia is which (14 million) progress to severe episodes. There was an more likely to be caused by antibiotic-resistant microbes estimated 880,000 deaths from pneumonia in children under and can require the highest antibiotic use in the critically ill the age of five in 2016. Most were less than 2 years of age. population. 3. In the US, pneumonia is less often fatal for children, but 15. Our changing interactions with the microbial world mean it is still a big problem.
    [Show full text]