Corruption and Integrity Improvement Initiatives in Developing Countries Corruption and Integrity Improvement Initiatives In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corruption and Integrity Improvement Initiatives in Developing Countries Corruption and Integrity Improvement Initiatives In Corruption and Integrity Improvement Initiatives in Developing Countries United Nations Development Programme Management Development and Governance Division Bureau for Development Policy 304 East 45th Street, 12th Floor New York, NY 10017 Tel : (212) 906-5054 Fax : (212) 906-6471 Email : [email protected] Corruption And Integrity Improvement Initiatives In Developing Countries offers views of eminent international thinkers and practitioners on how to reduce and eventually eliminate corruption. The book shows that, while helpful, democracy is by no means a cure for corruption, nor is economic liberalisation a panacea for ending public sector crime. The contributors call for strategies that combine law enforcement, prevention through institutional reforms and public support. A strong correlation between successful anti- corruption programmes and civil liberties is demonstrated throughout the book. Publication of this material follows an international conference in Paris on the same theme, co-sponsored by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the OECD Development Centre. CORRUPTION AND INTEGRITY IMPROVEMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES The views expressed in this book are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) or the OECD Development Centre. Table of Contents Message from Transparency International, Peter Eigen Preface Acknowledgements Overview, Sahr J. Kpundeh and Irene Hors Part 1 1. "Cross-Border Corruption": Points of Vulnerability and Challenges for Reform, Michael Johnston 2. Corruption and the Global Economy, Susan Rose-Ackerman Part 2 3. Corruption and Anti-Corruption Strategies: Issues and Case Studies from Developing Countries, Alan Doig and Stephen Riley 4. Revisiting Anti-Corruption Strategies: Tilt Towards Incentive-Driven Approaches, Daniel Kaufmann Part 3 5. The Role of Civil Society, Peter Eigen 6. Political Will in Fighting Corruption, Sahr J. Kpundeh 7. The Role of Civil Society and Patron-Client Networks in the Analysis of Corruption, Mushtaq H. Khan Part 4 8. Different Perspectives of International Organisations in the Fight Against Corruption Pauline Tamesis 9. Strengthening Domestic Institutions Against Corruption: A Public Ethics Checklist, Alexandra Mills 10. OECD Actions to Fight Bribery in International Business Transactions, Carolyn Ervin About the Contributors Appendices 1. United Nations General Assembly, Resolution on Corruption in 1997 2. OECD Convention on International Bribery in 1998 3. The Lima Declaration in 1997 Message from Transparency International Corruption is present in almost any country, but has the most devastating effects in developing economies, because it hinders any advance in economic growth and in democracy. Corruption wastes resources by distorting government policy against the interests of the majority and away from its proper goals. It turns the energies and efforts of public officials and citizens towards easy money instead of productive activities. It hampers the growth of competitiveness, frustrates efforts to alleviate poverty and generates apathy and cynicism. The harms caused by corruption, which are as numerous as the shapes corruption can take, have destroyed well-intentioned development projects in the South and undermined political and economic transitions in the East. Whereas in a developed country corruption may prevail in a single component of the body politic, in a developing country, which often has weaker administrations and political institutions, the corruption problem can actually become part of the system. In Ecuador, its proliferation has endangered the country’s democracy. In Tanzania, corruption has been found in all sectors of society and has appeared as the main source of public discontent. Dealing with corruption is far from being simply a matter of law enforcement. The casualties of corruption include the country’s integrity system itself, and therefore reform of the national integrity system has to take place. In this effort, it is important from the outset that the political will is present to obtain legislative or administrative changes effective enough to contain corruption. It is also essential to have the three main actors of society working together: the government, the private sector and the civil society. The energies of all three are needed to assure changes in moral and ethical attitudes and to achieve meaningful reforms. The role and the importance of international institutions in dealing with corruption have increased dramatically within the past few years. At the national level as well as internationally they have declared war on corruption and taken concrete steps to minimise its prevalence. Agreements over recommendations and international conventions (OECD), the introduction of specific procurement guidelines (World Bank, OECD DAC) and the development of projects promoting greater monitoring, transparency and accountability (UNDP, USAID) in countries in which donor agencies work, are examples of very effective measures towards the banishment of corruption. This publication will provide the reader with a clear idea of the approaches mentioned above, what their strengths are and how they can weaken corruption practices. Corruption is multiple and needs to be fought on different fronts simultaneously. I therefore feel a certain relief and encouragement to see so many dedicated people and institutions, providing support and commitment to eradicate corruption. I would also like to express my appreciation to the OECD Development Centre and to UNDP’s Programme for Accountability and Transparency for having provided us, during the conference on Corruption and Integrity Improvement Initiatives in the Context of Developing Economies, with a valuable opportunity for presenting and exchanging ideas, perspectives and approaches toward the analysis of the corruption problem generally and in specific cases, as well as with regards to ways of acting to curb this scourge. Peter Eigen, Chairman Transparency International (TI) Berlin, Germany April, 1998 Preface The international community's concern with corruption issues is not a passing phenomenon. It is now an accepted fact that corruption hinders economic growth and sustainable development and often results in human right violations. A firm commitment from all players -- government, the private sector and civil society -- is required to develop and implement solutions. Such solutions must include concrete measures -- preventive as well as punitive -- that address issues of accountability, transparency and inequity at various levels of social and economic systems. In this respect, the international community has a role to play both as catalyst and supporter for these reform efforts. The particularly complex nature of corruption makes international co-operation and co-ordination even more critical to the successful implementation of strategies to improve integrity in governance. The need to build partnerships and encourage closer collaboration among all players in the international development community was underscored at the conference Corruption and Integrity-Improvement Initiatives in Developing Countries, held at the OECD Headquarters in Paris on 24-25 October 1997. The conference was jointly organised by the OECD Development Centre and the UNDP Programme for Accountability and Transparency (PACT). The meeting provided a forum for participants -- policy makers, academics, government representatives, experts, international development institutions and aid agencies -- to discuss the difficulties surrounding the design of effective strategies given a context of diverse corruption patterns and country-specific circumstances. In addition, the international dimension of corruption and the role of aid and lending agencies were addressed. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the participants had the opportunity to debate some of the solutions and strategies that are proposed to developing countries to assist in their anti-corruption campaigns. Both the OECD Development Centre and UNDP have programmes in place to study corruption and to assist policy makers in the fight against corruption. UNDP’s involvement is rooted in its mandate to create an enabling environment for sustainable human development. The PACT serves as the focal point within UNDP to ensure a coherent and effective strategy in supporting anti-corruption programmes. Its work focuses on (i) facilitating good governance interventions in specific domains; (ii) supporting methods to curb corruption, including policy dialogue, capacity building, documentation and analysis of best practices and support to national programmes; and (iii) making reformers aware of the importance of country conditions in programme development. At the OECD Development Centre, policy-oriented research on corruption in OECD non-Member countries has been a priority since 1996. This work has a dual objective: to provide policy recommendations to developing country governments and aid agencies in their fight against corruption; and to provide OECD Member countries with a clearer understanding of the causes and consequences of corruption in developing countries. By using an analytical framework of corruption issues to explore country case studies, the project seeks to identify the diverse forms of corruption in various countries and the ways in which they affect economic efficiency and governance. This publication covers a broad set of issues ranging
Recommended publications
  • 2019 FCPA/Anti-Corruption Year in Review
    FCPA/Anti-Corruption Developments: 2019 Year in Review January 21, 2020 FCPA/Anti-Corruption Developments: 2019 Year in Review Lucinda A. Low and Brittany Prelogar (eds.)1 Introduction US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement authorities announced a steady stream of individual and corporate enforcement matters throughout 2019, some with eye-popping fines. Overall, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reported 50 FCPA-related actions (including 31 by the DOJ and 19 by the SEC) over the course of the year. The $2.9 billion in total fines, penalties, and disgorgement imposed in corporate FCPA settlements in 2019 nearly matched the record-breaking $2.91 billion imposed in 2018 in such matters. The DOJ also announced a slew of new charges against individuals and racked up a number of trial victories in existing cases. Mega settlements reached by two companies made up nearly two-thirds of the $2.9 billion total corporate penalties imposed in 2019. In the first quarter of the year, Mobile TeleSystems PJSC (MTS) agreed to pay $850 million in penalties and disgorgement to resolve charges against it, joining the ranks of fellow companies Telia and VimpelCom among the top FCPA fines to date for conduct relating to the Uzbek telecommunications sector. In a strong book-end to the year, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson) and its subsidiary, Ericsson Egypt Ltd. (Ericsson Egypt), agreed to pay more than $1 billion in penalties and disgorgement to resolve DOJ and SEC investigations for conduct in multiple countries. Enforcement against individuals, especially by the DOJ, was also particularly robust in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    6 JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ELECTIONS ELECTORAL COMPETITION IN BOTSWANA Is the Playing Field Level? David Sebudubudu and Bugalo Maripe Professor David Sebudubudu is a professor of Political Science and Head of the Department of Political and Administrative Studies, University of Botswana e-mail: [email protected] Bugalo Maripe is a senior lecturer in the Department of Law, University of Botswana e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The central thesis of this article is that the electoral process in Botswana belies the oft-cited claim that the country is a haven of democracy. Botswana has held ten successive elections since 1965, yet the same party, the Botswana Democratic Party (BDP), has been returned to power without fail. At a glance, and taking these elections into consideration, Botswana would appear to be an extraordinary country in the African context – one where democracy is in the process of consolidation. Far from it. A closer assessment shows that Botswana’s electoral competition is deceptive and that there is a deficit of competitive elections, a key requisite for the consolidation of democracy. The article examines the factors that contribute to the flawed electoral competition and concludes that the country’s electoral process does not satisfy international standards of free and fair elections. INTRODUCTION Since the term democracy was first used, in the fifth century BC (Holden 1993), unending convoluted debates about its definition have preoccupied scholars, practitioners and students of politics. What is evident from the literature is that there is no one satisfactory or acceptable definition of democracy. This remains a puzzle, if not a paradox, as there has been no unanimity in defining it (Morlino 2012; Economist Intelligence Unit – EIU 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Causes and Permanence of Corruption, the Role of Trust, and Social Dilemmas: the Case of Ecuador+
    Causes and permanence of corruption, the role of trust, and social dilemmas: The case of Ecuador+ ENRIQUE CRESPO* The London School of Economics and Political Science [email protected] https://doi.org/10.18800/rcpg.201702.001 A The present study aims to discuss corruption, its causes, and its persistence using the research agenda proposed by Bo Rothstein. As a rule, studies and theories have analysed corruption using structural variables like the economy, social development, and democracy, among others. Nevertheless, little has been explained about the role of other—non-structural—variables in generating and sustaining corruption, such as interpersonal/institutional trust and social dilemmas. Therefore, this study will use data obtained from the Vanderbilt University project Americas Barometer in 2014 to analyse the case of Ecuador. The objective of this paper is twofold: first, to contrast the claims of major theories of structural causes of corruption with what is observed in Ecuador, and second, to use Rothstein’s framework to assess the links between trust, social dilemmas, and corruption in the selected case study. From this analysis, we can assert that the hypotheses constructed by Rothstein are confirmed in the case of Ecuador. On the one hand, there seems to be a positive correlation between vertical and horizontal trust in the country. On the other hand, looking at the fitted models, it is also possible to claim that there is a negative association between interpersonal trust and the perception and persistence of corruption in Ecuador. Keywords: corruption, trust, interpersonal, institutional, structural, social dilemmas, Ecuador, causes, persistence. + Recibido el 24 de mayo de 2017; aceptado el 13 de setiembre de 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption and Quality of Governance
    Center for Strategic Studies and Reforms (CISR) Transparency International – Moldova Corruption and Quality of Governance January 2001 Prepared by: Dr. Lilia Carasciuc, Executive Director of Transparency International – Moldova, expert of the Center for Strategic Studies and Reforms, With the financial support of: Public Affairs Section of the Embassy of US in Moldova This study was funded by the United States Public Affairs Section – Chisinau. The findings, interpretations and conclusions presented in this report are entirely those of the author. The United States Public Affairs Section – Chisinau or the United States Government neither endorses nor takes responsibility for the content of this publication. Acknowledgements The author expresses her gratitude to the Public Affairs Section of the US Embassy in the Republic of Moldova for the financial assistance of this research. Special gratitude to Bernell McIntire, Lisa M. Heilbronn and Rodica Stavarrache for their moral support and valuable advise, to the team of CISR (Dr.A. Gudym, A. Bucatca, A. Turcan, G. Balan , V. Bulan) for excellent co-operation in carrying out the opinion poll. The study has benefited greatly from contacts with Donald Bowser (Transparency International). I also express many thanks to sociologists, Dr. V. Turcan and Dr. I. Jigau for their consulting and for conducting the poll. I am grateful for the team of 50 interviewers. Contents Introductory note 5 1. The face of corruption in Moldova 6 1.1 Notion of corruption on the national scene 6 1.2 Causes of corruption 6 1.3 The place of Moldova in international rankings 7 1.4 Consequences of corruption 9 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Natl%20Poll%20July%202008%20-%20Release%20To %20Press.Pdf
    University of Pennsylvania From the SelectedWorks of Philip M. Nichols March 22, 2011 The sP ychic Costs of Violating Corruption Laws Philip M. Nichols, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania Available at: https://works.bepress.com/philip_nichols/4/ The Psychic Costs of Violating Corruption Laws Philip M. Nichols* 1. Corruption Presents Significant Issues . 6 1.1 Endemic Corruption . 7 1.2. Corruption Inflicts Substantial Damage . .12 1.2.1. Weak Governments that make Poor Decisions . .13 1.2.1.1. Corruption Affects the Composition of Decisionmakers . .14 1.2.1.2. Corruption Distorts the Decisionmaking Process . 15 1.2.2. Corruption Causes Economic Fragility . .18 1.2.3. Corruption Degrades the Connection Between Governments and People .22 1.2.4. Corruption Degrades the Quality of Life . 24 2. Corruption Control in Malaysia and Singapore . .26 2.1. The Historical Context of Malaysia and Singapore . 26 2.2. Corruption Control in Malaysia and Singapore . .32 2.2.1. Malaysia . 33 2.2.2 Singapore . 37 3. Discussions on Corruption in Singapore and Malaysia . .39 3.1. Attitudes toward Corruption . 43 3.1.1. Singapore . 43 3.1.2. Malaysia . .46 3.2 Manifestation of and Experience with Corruption . .47 3.2.1 Singapore . .47 3.2.2. Malaysia . 52 3.3. Responses to Corruption Agencies . 57 3.3.1. Singapore . 57 3.3.2. Malaysia . 58 4. The Implementation of Corruption Laws . 60 4.1. Internalization of Corruption Controls . 60 4.2. Corruption is not Monolithic . 68 4.3. Corruption can be Controlled . 75 Conclusion . 80 * Associate Professor of Legal Studies and Business Ethics, Class of 1940 Bicentennial Reunion Term Professor, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Does Corruption Have Different Effects on Economic Growth? – a Case Study of Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia
    Linköpings universitet | Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utveckling Kandidatuppsats, 15 Hp | Politices Kandidatprogram - Nationalekonomi Vårterminen 2016 | LIU-IEI-FIL-G--16/01535--SE Why does corruption have different effects on economic growth? – A case study of Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia Varför har korruption olika effekter på ekonomisk tillväxt? – En fallstudie av Afrika söder om Sahara och Sydostasien Amalia Brandt Hjertstedt Hana Cetina Handledare: Bo Sjö Linköpings universitet SE-581 83 Linköping, Sverige 013-28 10 00, www.liu.se 1 Abstract The purpose of this study is to examine and analyse how corruption can have different outcome on economic growth. A clear division can be seen in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia where corruption have different economic outcomes. The countries in this study are the following: Botswana, Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia. The thesis composes of data over corruption indexes, annual growth in GDP, and socio-economic indicators such as political stability and Rule of Law. The result from the assembled statistics is analysed through the Principal-Agent theory as well as previous research. Previous research includes both positive and negative studies on corruption. The conclusion is that corruption has not a direct effect on economic growth but socio-economic indicators have an important role to explain the different outcome on corruption. The Principal- Agent theory helps us to understand the structure of the governmental body and the outcome of corruption. 1 Sammanfattning Syftet med denna uppsats är att undersöka och analysera varför korruption har olika effekter på ekonomisk tillväxt. Det finns en tydlig skillnad i hur korruption påverkar ekonomisk tillväxt, där det har gått i två olika riktningar.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Corruption in Africa – a Comparative Study of Uganda and Botswana Dissertation
    Fighting Corruption in Africa – A Comparative Study of Uganda and Botswana Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Verwaltungswissenschaften (Dr. rer. publ.) der Deutschen Hochschule für Verwaltungswissenschaften Speyer vorgelegt von: Stefan Ittner Speyer, 2009 Erstgutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. iur. Hans Herbert von Arnim, Dipl.-Volkswirt Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Sefik Alp Bahadir Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 18. März 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ___________________________________________ 4 I. INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________ 5 1. Object and Scope of Study ______________________________________________ 5 2. Structure of the Study_________________________________________________ 15 II. DEFINING CORRUPTION ______________________________________ 17 III. FIGHTING CORRUPTION ______________________________________ 26 1. Common Strategies Against Corruption__________________________________ 26 2. Criteria For Judging the Effectiveness of Anti-corruption Measures __________ 30 3. Difficulties in Fighting Corruption ______________________________________ 34 3.1 General Problems _________________________________________________________34 3.2 Specific Problems of Fighting Corruption in African Countries ______________________43 IV. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGIES IN UGANDA AND BOTSWANA_____________________________________ 50 1. Historical Background and Determining Factors of Corruption ______________ 50 1.1 Country Profiles___________________________________________________________50
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Governance Issues in Botswana
    MARCH 2021 THE BIG GOVERNANCE ISSUES IN BOTSWANA A CIVIL SOCIETY SUBMISSION TO THE AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM Contents Executive Summary 3 Acknowledgments 7 Acronyms and Abbreviations 8 What is the APRM? 10 The BAPS Process 12 Ibrahim Index of African Governance Botswana: 2020 IIAG Scores, Ranks & Trends 120 CHAPTER 1 15 Introduction CHAPTER 2 16 Human Rights CHAPTER 3 27 Separation of Powers CHAPTER 4 35 Public Service and Decentralisation CHAPTER 5 43 Citizen Participation and Economic Inclusion CHAPTER 6 51 Transparency and Accountability CHAPTER 7 61 Vulnerable Groups CHAPTER 8 70 Education CHAPTER 9 80 Sustainable Development and Natural Resource Management, Access to Land and Infrastructure CHAPTER 10 91 Food Security CHAPTER 11 98 Crime and Security CHAPTER 12 108 Foreign Policy CHAPTER 13 113 Research and Development THE BIG GOVERNANCE ISSUES IN BOTSWANA: A CIVIL SOCIETY SUBMISSION TO THE APRM 3 Executive Summary Botswana’s civil society APRM Working Group has identified 12 governance issues to be included in this submission: 1 Human Rights The implementation of domestic and international legislation has meant that basic human rights are well protected in Botswana. However, these rights are not enjoyed equally by all. Areas of concern include violence against women and children; discrimination against indigenous peoples; child labour; over reliance on and abuses by the mining sector; respect for diversity and culture; effectiveness of social protection programmes; and access to quality healthcare services. It is recommended that government develop a comprehensive national action plan on human rights that applies to both state and business. 2 Separation of Powers Political and personal interests have made separation between Botswana’s three arms of government difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Botswana
    OVERVIEW OF CORRUPTION AND ANTI-CORRUPTION IN BOTSWANA QUERY SUMMARY Please compile a country profile of corruption and The government of Botswana is internationally anti-corruption in Botswana, with a focus on tertiary credited for its management of corruption. Keeping education. control of and reducing corruption is clearly paramount to maintain its good and clean CONTENT reputation. 1. Overview of corruption in Botswana Following corruption scandals during the 1990s, 2. Corruption in higher education involving misuse of public money or abuse of 3. Legal and institutional anti-corruption framework privileged power by several high-ranking 4. References government officials, Botswana has proactively sought to reinforce its legal and institutional \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ frameworks. Resources have been made available in order to better equip the country against the Author(s) corruption challenges it faces. Michael Badham-Jones, [email protected] Despite Botswana’s good reputation abroad, the country is still faced with some challenges with Reviewer(s): regard to corruption. A lack of transparency, deeply Marie Chêne, Tapiwa Uchizi Nyasulu, entrenched patronage networks, conflicts of interest Transparency International, and nepotism, together with concerns over judicial [email protected] independence, continue to blight the progress made. Date: 27 November 2014 © 2014 Transparency International. All rights reserved. This document should not be considered as representative of the Commission or Transparency International’s official position. Neither the European Commission,Transparency International nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. This Anti-Corruption Helpdesk is operated by Transparency International and funded by the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Unidad Educativa Javier
    UNIDAD EDUCATIVA JAVIER BGU “Corruption in Latin American countries, such as: Ecuador and Venezuela and its impact in the region.” By: Javier Cali Orellana Advisor: Mario Cadena 3rd BGU section “C” 2017-2018 1 GRATITUDE I want to thank God, my parents, teachers and colleagues and all those who have made the required education possible with the best implements and research methods required to make this monograph in the best way. 2 SUMMARY This monograph is based on a study of corruption in Latin American countries such as Ecuador and Venezuela and how this affects other countries in the region, is based on real information and verified with statistics and graphics where the level of corruption is demonstrated by countries and possible solutions that can be given to eradicate this social problem. Presenting here the monograph named: "Corruption in Latin American countries such as: Ecuador and Venezuela and its impact in the region." 3 INDEX Contenido _Toc502848393GRATITUDE ................................................................................................. 2 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 6 An overview of corruption ..................................................................................................... 8 1.1. General knowledge about corruption. .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Submitted in Accordance with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy the University of Leeds the Candidate Confi
    COMBATTING CORRUPTION IN SOUTHERN AFRICA: AN EXAMINATION OF ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCIES IN BOTSWANA, SOUTH AFRICA AND NAMIBIA By DAVID SEBUDUBLTDU Submitted in accordancewith the requirementsfor the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Institute for Politics and International Studies August 2002 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where referencehas beenmade to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understandingthat it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. Acknowledgments I have always been consciousof my debts to a lot of people in writing this piece of work. I wish to expressmy sincere thanks to all those who played impoftant roles in producing this work. In particular, I am grateful to my supervisors, Dr. Morris Szeftel and Dr. Ray Bush for their professional and personal advice. This thesis would not have been possible without their constant encouragementand support. My thanks go also to the Institute for Politics and International Studies and Ms Caroline Wise for their support in many ways. I would also like to thank all those who cooperatedwith me during my fieldwork in Botswana,Namibia and South Africa; in particular, the Director of the Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime (DCEC) in Botswana and his staff; the Ombudsman and her staff in Namibia; and in South Affica, The Public Protector and his Staff, The Director of the Investigating Directorate for SerousEconomic Offences (IDSEO) and his staff, and the head of the Special Investigating Unit and his staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring 'Success' in Five African Anti-Corruption Commissions
    Measuring ‘success’ in five African Anti-Corruption Commissions - the cases of Ghana, Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda & Zambia - by Alan Doig, David Watt & Robert Williams (Research Project Leader) May 2005 2 U4 reports Table of contents Executive summary ..............................................................................................................4 PART I Overview.................................................................................................................8 1.1 The Approach and the issues........................................................................................................8 1.2 Our findings ....................................................................................................................................9 1.3 Our recommendations.................................................................................................................10 PART II The main themes of the research framework..................................................... 11 2.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................11 2.2 The purpose of the research .......................................................................................................11 2.3 Hypotheses from the literature...................................................................................................12 2.4 Shaping the themes.......................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]