Relationships Between the Prefrontal Cortex and the Basal Ganglia in the Rat: Physiology of the Corticosubthalamic Circuits
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Basal Ganglia & Cerebellum
1/2/2019 This power point is made available as an educational resource or study aid for your use only. This presentation may not be duplicated for others and should not be redistributed or posted anywhere on the internet or on any personal websites. Your use of this resource is with the acknowledgment and acceptance of those restrictions. Basal Ganglia & Cerebellum – a quick overview MHD-Neuroanatomy – Neuroscience Block Gregory Gruener, MD, MBA, MHPE Vice Dean for Education, SSOM Professor, Department of Neurology LUHS a member of Trinity Health Outcomes you want to accomplish Basal ganglia review Define and identify the major divisions of the basal ganglia List the major basal ganglia functional loops and roles List the components of the basal ganglia functional “circuitry” and associated neurotransmitters Describe the direct and indirect motor pathways and relevance/role of the substantia nigra compacta 1 1/2/2019 Basal Ganglia Terminology Striatum Caudate nucleus Nucleus accumbens Putamen Globus pallidus (pallidum) internal segment (GPi) external segment (GPe) Subthalamic nucleus Substantia nigra compact part (SNc) reticular part (SNr) Basal ganglia “circuitry” • BG have no major outputs to LMNs – Influence LMNs via the cerebral cortex • Input to striatum from cortex is excitatory – Glutamate is the neurotransmitter • Principal output from BG is via GPi + SNr – Output to thalamus, GABA is the neurotransmitter • Thalamocortical projections are excitatory – Concerned with motor “intention” • Balance of excitatory & inhibitory inputs to striatum, determine whether thalamus is suppressed BG circuits are parallel loops • Motor loop – Concerned with learned movements • Cognitive loop – Concerned with motor “intention” • Limbic loop – Emotional aspects of movements • Oculomotor loop – Concerned with voluntary saccades (fast eye-movements) 2 1/2/2019 Basal ganglia “circuitry” Cortex Striatum Thalamus GPi + SNr Nolte. -
Substance P and Antagonists of the Neurokinin-1 Receptor In
Martinez AN and Philipp MT, J Neurol Neuromed (2016) 1(2): 29-36 Neuromedicine www.jneurology.com www.jneurology.com Journal of Neurology & Neuromedicine Mini Review Article Open Access Substance P and Antagonists of the Neurokinin-1 Receptor in Neuroinflammation Associated with Infectious and Neurodegenerative Diseases of the Central Nervous System Alejandra N. Martinez1 and Mario T. Philipp1,2* 1Division of Bacteriology & Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA, USA 2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA Article Info ABSTRACT Article Notes This review addresses the role that substance P (SP) and its preferred receptor Received: May 03, 2016 neurokinin-1 (NK1R) play in neuroinflammation associated with select bacterial, Accepted: May 18, 2016 viral, parasitic, and neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system. *Correspondence: The SP/NK1R complex is a key player in the interaction between the immune Division of Bacteriology and Parasitology and nervous systems. A common effect of this interaction is inflammation. For Tulane National Primate Research Center this reason and because of the predominance in the human brain of the NK1R, Covington, LA, USA its antagonists are attractive potential therapeutic agents. Preventing the Email: [email protected] deleterious effects of SP through the use of NK1R antagonists has been shown © 2016 Philipp MT. This article is distributed under the terms of to be a promising therapeutic strategy, as these antagonists are selective, the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License potent, and safe. Here we evaluate their utility in the treatment of different neuroinfectious and neuroinflammatory diseases, as a novel approach to Keywords clinical management of CNS inflammation. -
Conditional Ablation of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor-Trkb Signaling Impairs Striatal Neuron Development
Conditional ablation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor-TrkB signaling impairs striatal neuron development Yun Lia,1, Daishi Yuia, Bryan W. Luikarta,2, Renée M. McKaya, Yanjiao Lia, John L. Rubensteinb, and Luis F. Paradaa,3 aDepartment of Developmental Biology and Kent Waldrep Center for Basic Research on Nerve Growth and Regeneration, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390; and bNina Ireland Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143 Contributed by Luis F. Parada, August 2, 2012 (sent for review June 21, 2012) Neurotrophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor cascades pertaining to development, maturation, and function of (BDNF), are associated with the physiology of the striatum and the striatum remains to be delineated. the loss of its normal functioning under pathological conditions. In this study, we conditionally ablated BDNF or its receptor The role of BDNF and its downstream signaling in regulating the TrkB in corticostriatal and nigrostriatal neuronal circuits. We development of the striatum has not been fully investigated, found that Bdnf deletion in both cortex and substantia nigra led to Bdnf complete depletion of BDNF protein in the striatum. Mutant mice however. Here we report that ablation of in both the cortex displayed dramatic developmental abnormalities and neurological and substantia nigra depletes BDNF in the striatum, and leads to impairments. Furthermore, specific deletion of TrkB from striatal fi impaired striatal development, severe motor de cits, and postnatal neurons was sufficient to produce this wide range of developmental lethality. Furthermore, striatal-specific ablation of TrkB, the gene deficits. Thus, our results demonstrate that BDNF and TrkB play encoding the high-affinity receptor for BDNF, is sufficient to elicit critical paracrine and cell-autonomous roles, respectively, in the an array of striatal developmental abnormalities, including de- development and maintenance of striatal neurons. -
Age-Related Change in 5-HT6 Receptor Availability in Healthy Male Volunteers Measured with 11C-GSK215083 PET
BRIEF COMMUNICATION Age-Related Change in 5-HT6 Receptor Availability in Healthy Male Volunteers Measured with 11C-GSK215083 PET Rajiv Radhakrishnan1, Nabeel Nabulsi2, Edward Gaiser1, Jean-Dominique Gallezot2, Shannan Henry2, Beata Planeta2, Shu-fei Lin2, Jim Ropchan2, Wendol Williams1, Evan Morris2,3, Deepak Cyril D’Souza1, Yiyun Huang2, Richard E. Carson2,3, and David Matuskey1,2 1Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; 2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut because it presents an attractive therapeutic target for neuropsychi- Serotonin receptor 6 (5-hydroxytrypamine-6, or 5-HT6) is a potential atric disorders. therapeutic target given its distribution in brain regions that are Functionally, 5-HT6 exhibits excitatory action, but it can also important in depression, anxiety, and cognition. This study sought colocalize with g-aminobutyric acid–ergic neurons and produce an to investigate the effects of age on 5-HT6 receptor availability using inhibition of brain activity leading to complicated and discrepant 11 C-GSK215083, a PET ligand with affinity for 5-HT6 in the striatum results (2,4). Heterogeneous effects are also seen with other neu- and 5-HT in the cortex. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy male vol- 2A rotransmitters in specific brain regions, with 5-HT antagonism unteers (age range, 23–52 y) were scanned with 11C-GSK215083 6 PET. Time–activity curves in regions of interest were fitted using a resulting in increased extracellular glutamate, dopamine, and ace- multilinear analysis method. Nondisplaceable binding potential tylcholine in the frontal cortex and hippocampus (5,6), whereas (BPND) was calculated using the cerebellum as the reference region 5-HT6 agonists have been shown to produce increased extracellu- and corrected for partial-volume effects. -
Chronic Amphetamine Exposure Causes Long Term Effects on Dopamine Uptake in Cultured Cells Nafisa Ferdous
University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2016 Chronic Amphetamine Exposure Causes Long Term Effects On Dopamine Uptake In Cultured Cells Nafisa Ferdous Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Ferdous, Nafisa, "Chronic Amphetamine Exposure Causes Long Term Effects On Dopamine Uptake In Cultured Cells" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 2016. https://commons.und.edu/theses/2016 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHRONIC AMPHETAMINE EXPOSURE CAUSES LONG TERM EFFECTS ON DOPAMINE UPTAKE IN CULTURED CELLS By Nafisa Ferdous Bachelor of Science, North South University, Bangladesh 2012 A Thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota December 2016 ii PERMISSION Title Chronic amphetamine exposure causes long term effects on dopamine uptake in cultured cells Department Biomedical Sciences Degree Master of Science In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the Chairperson of the department or the Dean of the School of Graduate Studies. -
The Significance of NK1 Receptor Ligands and Their Application In
pharmaceutics Review The Significance of NK1 Receptor Ligands and Their Application in Targeted Radionuclide Tumour Therapy Agnieszka Majkowska-Pilip * , Paweł Krzysztof Halik and Ewa Gniazdowska Centre of Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-22-504-10-11 Received: 7 June 2019; Accepted: 16 August 2019; Published: 1 September 2019 Abstract: To date, our understanding of the Substance P (SP) and neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) system shows intricate relations between human physiology and disease occurrence or progression. Within the oncological field, overexpression of NK1R and this SP/NK1R system have been implicated in cancer cell progression and poor overall prognosis. This review focuses on providing an update on the current state of knowledge around the wide spectrum of NK1R ligands and applications of radioligands as radiopharmaceuticals. In this review, data concerning both the chemical and biological aspects of peptide and nonpeptide ligands as agonists or antagonists in classical and nuclear medicine, are presented and discussed. However, the research presented here is primarily focused on NK1R nonpeptide antagonistic ligands and the potential application of SP/NK1R system in targeted radionuclide tumour therapy. Keywords: neurokinin 1 receptor; Substance P; SP analogues; NK1R antagonists; targeted therapy; radioligands; tumour therapy; PET imaging 1. Introduction Neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R), also known as tachykinin receptor 1 (TACR1), belongs to the tachykinin receptor subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), also called seven-transmembrane domain receptors (Figure1)[ 1–3]. The human NK1 receptor structure [4] is available in Protein Data Bank (6E59). -
Opiate Influences on Nucleus Accumbens Neuronal Electrophysiology: Dopamine and Non-Dopamine Mechanisms
The Journal of Neuroscience, October 1969, 9(10): 35363546 Opiate Influences on Nucleus Accumbens Neuronal Electrophysiology: Dopamine and Non-Dopamine Mechanisms Ft. L. Hakan and S. J. Henriksen Department of Neuropharmacology, Research Institute of the Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California 92037 Single-unit recordings of nucleus accumbens septi (NAS) abuse potential for humans such as the opiate alkaloids (Goeders neurons in halothane-anesthetized rats revealed that mi- et al., 1984; Vaccarino et al., 1985; Corrigal and Vaccarino, croinfusions of morphine into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) 1988; Koob and Goeders, 1989). Although there is controversy primarily inhibited spontaneously active NAS units. These regarding the precise neuropharmacological mechanism(s) un- inhibitory effects were reversed by alpha-flupenthixol (s.c.), derlying opiate actions on the NAS and on NAS-related brain suggesting a role for dopamine (DA) in the observed opiate- circuitry (e.g., see Wise, 1987), behavioral research has indicated induced effect. VTA opiate microinfusions also inhibited the that these drugs may exert pharmacological influence over NAS evoked (driven) responses of silent cells (spontaneously function via dopamine (DA)-dependent and DA-independent inactive) in the NAS elicited by stimulation of hippocampal projections from the DA containing cell bodies of the midbrain afferents to the NAS. In addition, this inhibition of driven ventral tegmental area (VTA) (Bozarth and Wise, 198 l), the response was reversed by naloxone (s.c.) but not by alpha- cellular origin of the DA-ergic input to the NAS (see Kelly et flupenthixol, implying a VTA-mediated non-DA mechanism. al., 1980; Stinus et al., 1980; Kalivas et al., 1983; Pettit et al., Morphine applied iontophoretically to cells within the NAS 1984; Amahic and Koob, 1985; Vaccarino et al., 1986; Wise, inhibited spontaneous activity but not fimbria-driven cellular 1987; Di Chiara and Imperato, 1988; Koob and Goeders, 1989). -
Issues Surrounding the Cognitive Neuroscience of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998,5(2),161-172 Issues surrounding the cognitive neuroscience of obsessive-compulsive disorder KEVIN D. WILSON University ofPennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been studied extensively in recent years, with increased emphasis on understanding OCD's biological substrates. There has been significant progress in docu menting abnormal brain function in OCD patients, particularly in the orbitofrontal cortex, basal gan glia, and thalamus. Similar progress has broadened our understanding of the cognitive and behavioral manifestations ofthe disorder, including deficits in set shifting, hyperattention, and visuospatial con struction abilities. Unfortunately, these results have not been replicated consistently. This report com prises a review of previous attempts to characterize the neurobiology and neuropsychology of OCD, and a discussion ofseveral factors in OCD research that can help to explain previous inconsistencies. Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a relatively logical features ofOCD. Only then will an adequate the common form ofpsychopathology with a lifetime preva ory ofthe cognitive neuroscience ofOCD be possible. lence of2%-3% (Robins et al., 1984). Although the ana tomical and behavioral regularities of the disorder have PHENOMENOLOGY OF OeD been studied extensively over the past 20 years, there has been relatively little success in the attempt to establish OCD is grouped under the general heading ofanxiety how the former give rise to the latter. Popular models of disorders. The DSM-IV(American Psychological Asso OCD have drawn upon a variety ofdisciplines, including ciation, 1994) defines OCD as "recurrent obsessions or learning theory (Mowrer, 1960), cybernetics (Pitman, compulsions that are severe enough to be time consum 1987) and psychoanalysis (Fenichel, 1945). -
Distribution of Dopamine D3 Receptor Expressing Neurons in the Human Forebrain: Comparison with D2 Receptor Expressing Neurons Eugenia V
Distribution of Dopamine D3 Receptor Expressing Neurons in the Human Forebrain: Comparison with D2 Receptor Expressing Neurons Eugenia V. Gurevich, Ph.D., and Jeffrey N. Joyce, Ph.D. The dopamine D2 and D3 receptors are members of the D2 important difference from the rat is that D3 receptors were subfamily that includes the D2, D3 and D4 receptor. In the virtually absent in the ventral tegmental area. D3 receptor rat, the D3 receptor exhibits a distribution restricted to and D3 mRNA positive neurons were observed in sensory, mesolimbic regions with little overlap with the D2 receptor. hormonal, and association regions such as the nucleus Receptor binding and nonisotopic in situ hybridization basalis, anteroventral, mediodorsal, and geniculate nuclei of were used to study the distribution of the D3 receptors and the thalamus, mammillary nuclei, the basolateral, neurons positive for D3 mRNA in comparison to the D2 basomedial, and cortical nuclei of the amygdala. As revealed receptor/mRNA in subcortical regions of the human brain. by simultaneous labeling for D3 and D2 mRNA, D3 mRNA D2 binding sites were detected in all brain areas studied, was often expressed in D2 mRNA positive neurons. with the highest concentration found in the striatum Neurons that solely expressed D2 mRNA were numerous followed by the nucleus accumbens, external segment of the and regionally widespread, whereas only occasional D3- globus pallidus, substantia nigra and ventral tegmental positive-D2-negative cells were observed. The regions of area, medial preoptic area and tuberomammillary nucleus relatively higher expression of the D3 receptor and its of the hypothalamus. In most areas the presence of D2 mRNA appeared linked through functional circuits, but receptor sites coincided with the presence of neurons co-expression of D2 and D3 mRNA suggests a functional positive for its mRNA. -
Focused Ultrasound Enhanced Intranasal Delivery of Brain Derived
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Focused ultrasound enhanced intranasal delivery of brain derived neurotrophic factor produces neurorestorative efects in a Parkinson’s disease mouse model Robin Ji 1, Morgan Smith1, Yusuke Niimi1, Maria E. Karakatsani 1, Maria F. Murillo1, Vernice Jackson-Lewis3,5,6, Serge Przedborski3,4,5,6 & Elisa E. Konofagou1,2* Focused ultrasound-enhanced intranasal (IN + FUS) delivery is a noninvasive approach that utilizes the olfactory pathway to administer pharmacological agents directly to the brain, allowing for a more homogenous distribution in targeted locations compared to IN delivery alone. However, whether such a strategy has therapeutic values, especially in neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), remains to be established. Herein, we evaluated whether the expression of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), the rate limiting enzyme in dopamine catalysis, could be enhanced by IN + FUS delivery of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in a toxin-based PD mouse model. Mice were put on the subacute dosing regimen of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), producing bilateral degeneration of the nigrostriatal pathway consistent with early-stage PD. MPTP mice then received BDNF intranasally followed by multiple unilateral FUS-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) openings in the left basal ganglia for three consecutive weeks. Subsequently, mice were survived for two months and were evaluated morphologically and behaviorally to determine the integrity of their nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathways. Mice receiving IN + FUS had signifcantly increased TH immunoreactivity in the treated hemisphere compared to the untreated hemisphere while mice receiving only FUS-induced BBB opening or no treatment at all did not show any diferences. -
6950.Full.Pdf
6950 • The Journal of Neuroscience, July 2, 2008 • 28(27):6950–6959 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Functional Interaction between the Hippocampus and Nucleus Accumbens Shell Is Necessary for the Acquisition of Appetitive Spatial Context Conditioning Rutsuko Ito,1,3 Trevor W. Robbins,1 Cyriel M. Pennartz,2 and Barry J. Everitt1 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom, 2Graduate School Neurosciences Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, 1098 SM Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and 3Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom The nucleus accumbens (NAc) has been implicated in a variety of associative processes that are dependent on the integrity of the amygdala and hippocampus (HPC). However, the extent to which the two subregions of the NAc, the core and shell, form differentiated circuits within the amygdala- and hippocampal-ventral striatal circuitry remains unclear. The present study investigated the effects of selective excitotoxic lesions of the nucleus accumbens shell or core subregion on appetitive elemental cue and context conditioning, shown previously to be dependent on the basolateral amygdala and hippocampus, respectively. Rats were trained sequentially to acquire discrete conditioned stimulus–sucrose conditioning, followed by spatial context–sucrose conditioning in a place preference apparatus characterized by three topographically identical chambers, the chambers being discriminable only on the basis of path integration. NAc shell lesions selectively impaired the acquisition of conditioned place preference and the use of spatial information to retrieve informa- tion about a discrete cue, whereas, as expected, NAc core lesions attenuated the acquisition of cue conditioning compared with sham rats. -
Motor Systems Basal Ganglia
Motor systems 409 Basal Ganglia You have just read about the different motor-related cortical areas. Premotor areas are involved in planning, while MI is involved in execution. What you don’t know is that the cortical areas involved in movement control need “help” from other brain circuits in order to smoothly orchestrate motor behaviors. One of these circuits involves a group of structures deep in the brain called the basal ganglia. While their exact motor function is still debated, the basal ganglia clearly regulate movement. Without information from the basal ganglia, the cortex is unable to properly direct motor control, and the deficits seen in Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease and related movement disorders become apparent. Let’s start with the anatomy of the basal ganglia. The important “players” are identified in the adjacent figure. The caudate and putamen have similar functions, and we will consider them as one in this discussion. Together the caudate and putamen are called the neostriatum or simply striatum. All input to the basal ganglia circuit comes via the striatum. This input comes mainly from motor cortical areas. Notice that the caudate (L. tail) appears twice in many frontal brain sections. This is because the caudate curves around with the lateral ventricle. The head of the caudate is most anterior. It gives rise to a body whose “tail” extends with the ventricle into the temporal lobe (the “ball” at the end of the tail is the amygdala, whose limbic functions you will learn about later). Medial to the putamen is the globus pallidus (GP).