DOCSLIB.ORG

Mortgage Fraud , 59 BUFF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mortgage Fraud , 59 BUFF NO. 11-50621 USA v. Marcus Rosenberger USDC No. 7:10-CR-135-2 Cons w/ No. 11-50632 USDC No. 7:11-CR-60-1 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff-Appellee , v. MARCUS ROSENBERGER , Defendant-Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Midland Division Nos. 7:10-CR-135-2 and 7:11-CR-60-1; Hon. Robert Junell, Judge Presiding BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARCUS ROSENBERGER Seth Kretzer LAW OFFICES OF SETH KRETZER The Lyric Center 440 Louisiana Street; Suite 200 Houston, TX 77002 [Tel.] (713) 775-3050 [Fax] (713) 224-2815 COURT -APPOINTED ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT MARCUS ROSENBERGER CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES No. 10-10496 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff-Appellee , v. MARCUS ROSENBERGER Defendant-Appellant. The undersigned counsel of record certifies the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the judges of this court may evaluate their possible recusal or disqualification. 1. United States of America—Appellee. It is represented in the Fifth Circuit by: Mr. Joseph Gay United States Attorney’s Office 601 NW Loop 410; Suite 600 San Antonio, Texas 78216 The United States was represented in the district court proceedings by: AUSAs Austin Berry and Diana Cruz-Zapata United States Attorney’s Office 400 W. Illinois Street; Suite 1200 Midland, TX 79701 2. Marcus Rosenberger, Appellant. Anderson is represented in the Fifth Circuit by: Mr. Seth H. Kretzer LAW OFFICES OF SETH KRETZER -i- 440 Louisiana Street; Suite 200 Houston, TX 77002 Additional counsel who represented Rosenberger in the district court proceedings are: Justin Low John Young LAW OFFICES OF JUSTIN LOW ATTORNEY AT LAW 1400 N. Grandview 105 E. Third Street Odessa, TX 79761 Sweetwater, TX 79556 Robert Garcia, Jr. Fred Bigman LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT GARCIA , JR. BRIGMAN LAW OFFICE 413 North Texas Ave. 202 W. Beauregard Odessa, TX 79761 San Angelo, TX 79603 /s/ Seth Kretzer Seth Kretzer -ii- STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT Appellant Rosenberger requests oral argument. Rosenberger believes that oral argument would be of material assistance to the Court in evaluating, inter alia , the district court’s denial of Rosenberger’s properly preserved Rule 29 motions when the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions for Conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud. In support of this request, Rosenberger would note that his co-defendant, Jason Morrison, pled guilty but nevertheless risked his own Acceptance of Responsibility point reduction under U.S.S.G.§3E1.1 by testifying truthfully that he alone was responsible for ‘mortgage rescue fraud’ at issue: Q: Do you have any reason to know that [Rosenberger] knew you were in any way committing a fraud? A: No, he did not. R.1034. Since Morrison (not Rosenberger) was in charge of renegotiating mortgages and every single government witness testified that their most important financial dealings were entirely with Morrison rather than Rosenberger, oral argument could assist the court in determining whether the government adduced legally sufficient evidence to sustain Rosenberger’s convictions for conspiring with Morrison and for aiding and abetting conduct the perpetrator himself said Rosenberger knew nothing about. -iii- TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Certificate of Interested Parties ............................................................................ i Statement Regarding Oral Argument .................................................................. iii Table of Authorities ............................................................................................ ix Statement of Jurisdiction ..................................................................................... 1 Statement of Issue for Review ............................................................................ 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 3 Statement of the Case .......................................................................................... 4 I. Indictment in 7:10-cr-135 .......................................................................... 4 II. Trial ............................................................................................................ 5 III. Indictment in 7:11-cr-60 ............................................................................ 6 IV. Sentencing .................................................................................................. 6 A. PSR .................................................................................................. 6 B. The PSR Blended Both Actual and Intended Loss ......................... 7 1. Intended Loss in the 10-cr-135 Matter ................................. 7 2. Actual Loss in the 11-CR-60 Matter ..................................... 8 C. District Court Adopted an Intended Loss Amount Lower Than That Urged by Probation ................................................................. 8 D. Competing Motions for Upward and Downward Departure .......... 9 E. Upward Departure Was Rejected and Downward Departure for Diminished Capacity Granted ......................................................... 10 F. Judgments Imposed in the Respective Prosecutions ....................... 10 Statement of the Facts: 7:10-cr-135 ..................................................................... 11 A. Legitimate Real Estate Arbitrage .................................................... 11 -iv- 1. Rosenberger’s Longtime Work As A Realtor....................... 11 a. Matching Distressed Home-sellers With Homebuyers Without Access to Affordable Credit ......................... 12 2. The Prosecutor Himself Asked Leading Questions on Direct Examination if this Portion of Rosenberger’s Work Was “Perfectly Okay” ................................................................... 12 3. The Prosecutor Also Asked Leading Questions on Direct Examination About the Legitimate Nature of Real Estate Arbitrage Involving Auctioned Distressed Properties .......... 13 4. Morrison Regarded Rosenberger As A Mere Salesman ....... 14 B. Morrison’s Perpetrated What is Colloquially Known as ‘Mortgage Rescue Fraud’ .................................................................................. 15 1. Introduction ........................................................................... 15 2. The Seller/Owner Victims Were Always Approached by Morrison, Sold Their Homes to Morrison, and Expected Morrison to Absolve Their Foreclosure Problems ............... 16 a. Michael Jones ............................................................. 17 b. Benjamin Hall ............................................................. 18 c. Jamie Galvan .............................................................. 19 d. Paul Valles .................................................................. 20 e. Mario Deleon .............................................................. 20 3. Morrison Did Attempt to Negotiate Modifications with the Financial Institution Note-holders ........................................ 20 a. Morrison Did Not Instruct His Sellers to Skirt the “Due on Sale” Clause ................................................. 21 b. Morrison’s Modification Efforts ................................ 21 c. Payments Made on Mortgages ................................... 22 C. When Properly Structured, Owner-Financed Sales of Existing Homes Is Inherently Legitimate ...................................................... 22 1. Rosenberger Marketed Self-Financing By Morrison As Part of the Sales Product............................................................... 22 2. Each Notarized Promissory Note Identified That Payments Must Be Made to Morrison; Rosenberger’s Name Was Nowhere on the Documents .................................................. 23 3. The Flaw In This Business Model Arose Only As A Result of Morrison’s Omissions ....................................................... 24 4. Morrison Fails to Pay Rosenberger Any Commissions, and Rosenberger Separates .......................................................... 25 -v- Statement of the Facts: 7:11-cr-60 ....................................................................... 26 A. Cordero and Rosenberger ................................................................ 26 B. Rosenberger Refinanced His House to Cover Cordero’s Overdraft on Three Properties For Which the Sellers Had Been Paid but the Investor Withdrew Financing .......................................................... 26 C. Rosenberger Refinances .................................................................. 27 D. The Requisite Payment Was Not Made to Ameriquest .................. 28 Summary of the Argument .................................................................................. 29 Sufficiency of the Evidence ................................................................................. 29 Material Variance ................................................................................................. 30 Prosecutorial Misconduct ..................................................................................... 31 Reversal of All Convictions in the 10-cr-135 Requires Re-sentencing in the 11-CR-60 Matter ............................................................................................ 31 Standard of Review ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hosting the 'Holohoax': a Snapshot of Holocaust Denial Across Social Media
    COVID-19 disinformation briefingISD Briefing No.2 HostingFar-right the m ‘Holohoax’obilisation 10th9th August April 2020 2020 COVIDHosting-19 the disinformation ‘Holohoax’: A Snapshotbriefing of Holocaust no. 2 Denial Across Social Media Far-rightJakob Guhl mobilisation & Jacob Davey This is the second in a series of briefings from ISD’s Digital Research Unit on the information ecosystem around coronavirus (COVID-19). These briefings expose how Executivetechnology platformsSummary are being used to promote disinformation, hate, extremism and authoritarianism in the context of COVID-19. It is based on ISD’s mixture of natural Overviewlanguage processing, network analysis and ethnographic online research. This briefing Holocaustfocuses denialon the has way long far-right been one groups of the most and insidious individuals conspiracy are mobilising theories targeting around Jewish COVID-19 in communities,the with US. its The extremist first proponents briefing drawnin the from series across can the be ideological found on spectrum, ISD’s website. from extreme right-wing to hard left to Islamist. Research has shown that digital platforms have only served to amplify and mainstream this warped strain of thinking inTop recent Lines years.1 Far-rightThis briefing groups paper andprovides individuals a snapshot are of Holocaust denialAntisemitic content acrossspeech major and social ideas media are beingplatforms. opportunisticallyBy analysing the term using ‘holohoax’, the ongoingwhich is commonly usedadapted by Holocaust to incorporate deniers,
    [Show full text]
  • What They Donâ•Žt Want You to Know About Planet X: Surviving 2012
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Communication Studies Faculty Publications Communication Studies 7-25-2014 What They Don’t Want You to Know About Planet X: Surviving 2012 and the Aesthetics of Conspiracy Rhetoric Ian Reyes University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Jason K. Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/com_facpubs The University of Rhode Island Faculty have made this article openly available. Please let us know how Open Access to this research benefits you. This is a pre-publication author manuscript of the final, published article. Terms of Use This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable towards Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth in our Terms of Use. Citation/Publisher Attribution Reyes, Ian and Jason K. Smith. "What They Don't Want You to Know About Planet X: Surviving 2012 and the Aesthetics of Conspiracy Rhetoric." Communication Quarterly, vol. 62, no. 4, 2014, pp. 399-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2014.922483. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2014.922483 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication Studies at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “What They Don’t Want You to Know About Planet X: Surviving 2012 and the Aesthetics of Conspiracy Rhetoric” Ian Reyes Department of Communication Studies Harrington School of Communication and Media University of Rhode Island Davis Hall Kingston, RI 02881 [email protected] Jason K.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Aid 4: Challenging Conspiracy Theories
    Challenging Conspiracy Theories Teaching Aid 4 1. Increasing Knowledge about Jews and Judaism 2. Overcoming Unconscious Biases 3. Addressing Anti-Semitic Stereotypes and Prejudice 4. Challenging Conspiracy Theories 5. Teaching about Anti-Semitism through Holocaust Education 6. Addressing Holocaust Denial, Distortion and Trivialization 7. Anti-Semitism and National Memory Discourse 8. Dealing with Anti-Semitic Incidents 9. Dealing with Online Anti-Semitism 10. Anti-Semitism and the Situation in the Middle East What is a conspiracy Challenging theory? “A belief that some covert but Conspiracy influential organization is re- sponsible for an unexplained Theories event.” SOURCE: Concise Oxford Eng- lish Dictionary, ninth edition The world is full of challenging Such explanatory models reject of conspiracy theories presents complexities, one of which is accepted narratives, and official teachers with a challenge: to being able to identify fact from explanations are sometimes guide students to identify, con- fiction. People are inundated regarded as further evidence of front and refute such theories. with information from family, the conspiracy. Conspiracy the- friends, community and online ories build on distrust of estab- This teaching aid will look at sources. Political, economic, cul- lished institutions and process- how conspiracy theories func- tural and other forces shape the es, and often implicate groups tion, how they may relate to narratives we are exposed to that are associated with nega- anti-Semitism, and outline daily, and hidden
    [Show full text]
  • Free Speech and the Regulation of Lies Lyrissa Lidsky University of Missouri School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications 2008 Where's the Harm?: Free Speech and the Regulation of Lies Lyrissa Lidsky University of Missouri School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/facpubs Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett, Where's the Harm?: Free Speech and the Regulation of Lies, 65 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1091 (2008). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. Where's the Harm?: Free Speech and the Regulation of Lies Lyrissa Bamett Lidsky* Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................ 1091 II. The H arm of D enial .................................................................... 1092 III. A Breathing Space for Lies? ....................................................... 1095 IV. Unintended Consequences of Regulation in the Internet Age .... 1099 V . C onclusion .................................................................................. 110 1 I. Introduction False factual information has no First Amendment value,' and yet the United States Supreme Court has accorded lies a measure of First Amendment protection.2 The First Amendment imposes something in the nature of a * Professor of Law, University of Florida Levin College of Law. The author thanks David A. Anderson, Ron Krotoszynski, Jr., Michael Siebecker, and all of the participants inthe University of Louisville's First Amendment Discussion Forum for their helpful suggestions. Please email the author at [email protected] with comments or questions.
    [Show full text]
  • What Will It Mean to Us Today in 2015? (C) Copyright 2015 by Gil Carlson
    What will it mean to us today in 2015? (C) Copyright 2015 by Gil Carlson Wicked Wolf Press Email: [email protected] To discover the rest of the books in this Blue Planet Project Series: www.blue-planet-project.com/ What Awaits You Inside …….3 What is Nibiru? …….5 Orbit of Nibiru …….10 The Tablets of the Anunnaki …….11 Early hints of Nibiru nearing our Galaxy? …….32 Here’s the background on Nibiru …….38 Who are the Anunnaki? …….41 IS Nibiru INHABITED? …….42 Have Scientists Admitted that Nibiru Exists? …….44 When Will Nibiru Get Here? …….44 Likelihood of a Pole-Shift …….49 Biblical events in Relation to Nibiru …….51 When Will Nibiru Get Here? From Scientists …….52 When Will Nibiru Get Here? From Psychics …….69 The Orbit of Planet Nibiru …….71 What are Astronomers Seeing Now? …….76 Are Our Astronomers Being Silenced? …….81 Astronomer Harrington …….83 Interview with Dr. Rand on Nibiru …….86 The Nibiru Orbit and the Pole Shift …….88 Latest Scientific Evidence on Nibiru …….89 What Earth Changes will Nibiru Cause? …….93 Surviving the Pole-Shift Event …….94 Your Personal Disaster Preparations …….96 Government Preparations for Nibiru …….103 Comments …….103 Message from the Anunnaki …….108 Is Nibiru just a Hoax? …….113 Planet X Cover-up in Mainstream Media …….118 Nibiru 2015 - Page 2 What Awaits You Inside... Oh no, not another Nibiru book! Yes, my friend, it is here, hot off the presses. I too have been extremely interested in the concept of a Planet X, but there just isn’t enough current information in print that accurately applies to what is happening today.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspiracy Theories As Superstition: Today’S Mirror Image in Spinoza’S Tractatus Theologico-Politicus
    philosophies Article Conspiracy Theories as Superstition: Today’s Mirror Image in Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus Jamie van der Klaauw Erasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; [email protected] Abstract: The contention in this paper is that the theological-political disputes Spinoza was con- cerned with 350 years ago are similar to the conspiratorial disputes we experience today. The world in Spinoza’s Tractatus theologico-politicus, a political intervention in his time, serves as a “mir- ror image”, that is to say, it deals with the same problem we face today albeit in a different mode. Understanding our contemporary condition under the auspices of a Spinozist perspective, problems in countermeasures to the conspiratorial disputes come to light. Scholarly work and practice focus on the epistemological dimension of conspiracy theories, tying in the extent to which they are problematic to the degree in which they deal in untruth. However, the lesson from Spinoza’s analysis of the theological-political disputes is that such theories do not deal in truth, but, in affect, they do not spring from a lack of education but a lack of certainty. The work of Spinoza opens up a different approach, and if our aim is like that of the TTP, to defend political life against the threat of civil war, such a different approach is in order. Keywords: conspiracy theory; political affect; superstition; Spinoza; tractatus theologico-politicus Citation: van der Klaauw, J. Conspiracy Theories as Superstition: Today’s Mirror Image in Spinoza’s For I have shown that Scripture does not teach things through their proximate causes, Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Paranoid Style": an Introduction to Conspiracy Theories
    1 "The Paranoid Style": An Introduction to Conspiracy Theories (AP Photo) Robert Graysmith, author of Zodiac and Zodiac Unmasked, views cryptographs used by the Zodiac killer. After Hofstadter: Conspiracy Theories in America By Paul McCaffrey Most authorities agree that the modern study of conspiracy theories began in 1964, when the historian Richard Hofstadter published his seminal essay “The Paranoid Style in American Politics” in the October issue of Harper’s Magazine. Though Hof- stadter’s thesis has endured its share of criticism over the years, with some contend- ing that the ideas he enunciated have since been overapplied, it remains one of the essential texts in understanding conspiracy theories and their various components. Written in the long shadow of the John F. Kennedy assassination, “The Paranoid Style” is very much a product of its time and place, yet the issues and themes it il- luminates continue to resonate in the present day. Moreover, through his survey of conspiracy theories throughout American history, Hofstadter draws powerful paral- lels between the past and the present, suggesting that the so-called “paranoid style” is a common and enduring historical current, one that comes in “waves of different intensity, [but] appears to be all but ineradicable.” While Hofstadter’s modern examination focuses on right-wing political move- ments in the United States—Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Red Scare and the John Birch Society, for example—he explores antecedents going back to the 1700s that do not fall so neatly on one side or the other of the Left-Right divide, such as an- ti-Catholic and anti-Masonic movements.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2018.1493876 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Zia-Ebrahimi, R. (2018). When the Elders of Zion relocated to Eurabia: Conspiratorial racialization in antisemitism and Islamophobia . PATTERNS OF PREJUDICE, 52(4), 314-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2018.1493876 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Denial and Distortion
    Holocaust Denial and Distortion Holocaust denial and distortion are examples of contemporary antisemitism that grew after World War II. They challenge the reality of the mass murder of six million Jews by the Nazis and their allies during World War II, despite the fact that the Holocaust is the most well documented genocide that has ever occurred. Holocaust denial and distortion are irrational and fly in the face of the facts. As such, Holocaust deniers and distorters generally are motivated by their hatred of Jews, and their denial has another motive. This may be delegitimization of the State of Israel by saying that the Holocaust was a “hoax” invented as a rationale to give special treatment to the Jews by giving them a State. There are several streams of Holocaust denial and distortion. Some claim that the Holocaust never happened; that is, they deny the “fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g., gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of national Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).” They claim that true accounts of the Holocaust are lies made up by Jews for their own benefit. Outright denial of the Holocaust is considerably less common than distortion of the Holocaust, which is not an attempt to deny that the Holocaust took place, but rather an attempt to rewrite the narrative of World War II and the annihilation of European Jewry. At its simplest, Holocaust distortion excuses, minimizes, or misrepresents the known historical record of the Holocaust. It may manifest itself as intentional efforts to excuse or minimize the impact of the Holocaust; gross minimization of the number of victims; attempts to blame Jews for the Holocaust; using the term to describe related atrocities or by engaging in false comparisons with other mass crimes; casting the Holocaust as a positive historical event; or blurring responsibility for the murders of the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Determinants of Conspiratorial Ideation
    SRDXXX10.1177/2378023116689791SociusDiGrazia 689791research-article2017 Original Article Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World Volume 3: 1 –9 © The Author(s) 2017 The Social Determinants of Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Conspiratorial Ideation DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116689791 10.1177/2378023116689791 journals.sagepub.com/home/srd Joseph DiGrazia1 Abstract Scholars have recently become increasingly interested in understanding the prevalence and persistence of conspiratorial beliefs among the public as recent research has shown such beliefs to be both widespread and to have deleterious effects on the political process. This article seeks to develop a sociological understanding of the structural conditions that are associated with conspiratorial belief. Using aggregate Google search data to measure public interest in two popular political conspiracy theories, the findings indicate that social conditions associated with threat and insecurity, including unemployment, changes in partisan control of government, and demographic changes, are associated with increased conspiratorial ideation. Keywords conspiracy theories, political beliefs Scholars have been interested in the relevance of conspirato- While there has been a considerable amount of research rial beliefs to the political process for many decades. on belief in conspiracy theories and conspiratorial ideation, Hofstadter (1964) provides, perhaps, the most definitive the majority of it has focused on the individual psychology description of what he called “the paranoid style”—the ten- and characteristics of those who believe in conspiracy theo- dency to see grand conspiracies against one’s culture or way ries as well as the social-psychological processes that account of life as major motivating forces of history. Hofstadter for the diffusion of such theories through social networks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conspiracy Conception of World Jihad As an Instrument for the Islamization of Europe
    Політичні науки Vol. 5, No. 2, 2019 УДК 327:28-768(4) https://doi.org/ THE CONSPIRACY CONCEPTION OF WORLD JIHAD AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE ISLAMIZATION OF EUROPE Olha Ivasechko Lviv Polytechnic National University ORCID ID 0000-0003-2141-3309 [email protected] Yaryna Turchyn Lviv Polytechnic National University Researcher ID R-1932-2017 Author ID: 57192268948 [email protected] ((стаття надійшла до редколегії – 22.09.2019 р., прийнята до друку – 21.10.2019 р.) © Івасечко О., Турчин Я., 2019 р. The article reveals the essence of the conspiracy concept of world jihad as an instrument for the Islamization of Europe and explores its influence on public opinion in Western European countries. The assessment of the existing and potential risks of conspiratorial thinking spread in Western European countries accomplished by The International Center for The Study of Radicalization and Political Violence (ICSR), as well as the Think Tank Pew Research Center experts’ forecasts as an attempt to refute the conspiracy concept about the inevitable world jihad implementation through demographic transformation have analyzed. It has been found that, despite the increasing proportion of Muslims in the European population, there are no objective reasons for claiming the inevitability of world jihad. It has been concluded that the «Islamophobia» virus, like other conspiracy concepts based on stereotypical notions about certain peoples, is not a new phenomenon. However, the conspiracy theories about the transformation of the European region into the so-called «Eurabia» have become especially relevant in the context of recent intensification of migration flows to European countries. Proceeding from the latest news about different conspiratorial statements of Western European political leaders, the disregard of the outbreaks of the «conspiracy thinking epidemic» and the use of Islamophobic conspiracy concepts to misinform people will necessitate declaring the region a «quarantine zone».
    [Show full text]
  • Conspiracy Theory and the Society of the Cincinnati, 1783-1790
    The ‘Deepest Piece of Cunning’ Conspiracy Theory and the Society of the Cincinnati, 1783-1790 Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München vorgelegt von Markus Hünemörder aus München München, 2003 ii Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Berndt Ostendorf Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael Wala Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 21.7.2003 iii What is to be done with the Cincinnati: is that order of Chivalry, that In- road upon our first Principle, Equality, to be connived at? It is the deep- est Piece of Cunning yet attempted. John Adams1 1 John Adams to Elbridge Gerry, 25 April 1785, Elbridge Gerry Papers, DLC. iv Contents Preface and Acknowledgements .......................................................................................vii Abbreviations........................................................................................................................ x Abstract................................................................................................................................ xi Introduction: Conspiracy Theory and America ................................................................. 1 The Conspiracy Theory about the Society of the Cincinnati................................. 4 Historiography.......................................................................................................... 8 An American Conspiracy Theory.......................................................................... 16 1. The Theory of Conspiracy ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]