DOCSLIB.ORG

Division 001 of the Public Works Design Standards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Division 001 of the Public Works Design Standards CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIVE RULES DESIGN STANDARDS TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION APPENDICES 001 GENERAL 1A ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS 1B REQUIREMENTS FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS 1C TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT FORMAT 002 DRAFTING AND DRAWING STANDARDS 003 SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM 004 STORMWATER SYSTEM 4A STORMWATER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 4B LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS AND PLANT LISTS FOR STORMWATER FACILITIES 4C INFILTRATION TESTING 4D HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS 4E IMPLEMENTING GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE 4F LIST OF ACCEPTED MANUFACTURED STORMWATER FACILITIES 4G KEY MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS 005 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 006 STREET DESIGN STANDARDS 007 EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 7A EPSC PLAN STANDARD NOTES 7B PLAN REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST 7C EPSC PLAN FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 109-TOC City of Salem Administrative Rules CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAPTER 109 DIVISION 001 GENERAL―DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION 1.1 ―INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 ―DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 ―APPLICATION OF STANDARDS REQUIRED ............................................................................... 2 1.4 ―PROJECT COORDINATION ....................................................................................................... 2 1.5 ―FIELD INVESTIGATION REQUIRED DURING DESIGN ................................................................ 3 1.6 ―LOCATION OF UTILITIES WITHIN THE ROW OR PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS (PUE) ............. 3 (a) Franchise Utilities ..........................................................................................................3 (b) Water―Sewer Separation ..............................................................................................3 (c) Water Main Location ......................................................................................................3 (d) Sanitary Sewer Main Location .......................................................................................3 (e) Storm Drain Location .....................................................................................................4 1.7 ―BORING, TUNNELING, AND JACKING ...................................................................................... 4 (a) General ...........................................................................................................................4 (b) Location of Existing Utilities..........................................................................................4 (c) Boring, Tunneling, and Jacking within the Critical Tree Zone ......................................5 1.8 ―EASEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 5 (a) General ...........................................................................................................................5 (b) Pipeline Easements ........................................................................................................5 (c) Public Utility Easements (PUE) .....................................................................................6 (d) Open Channel Easements...............................................................................................6 (e) Access Easements ...........................................................................................................7 (f) Common Easements ........................................................................................................7 1.9 ―ENGINEER OF RECORD REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................. 8 1.10 ―SURVEYING STANDARDS FOR PLANS SUBMITTAL ................................................................ 8 1.11 ―PRESERVATION OF TREES AND VEGETATION ....................................................................... 8 1.12 ―MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE ............................................................................................ 8 109-001 (January 2016) City of Salem Administrative Rules 1.13 ―GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATIONS ............................................................................................ 9 1.14 ―HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGY REQUIREMENTS ................................................................... 9 1.15 ―TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. 9 1.16 ―PERMITS ............................................................................................................................... 9 (a) Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control (EPSC) Permit .....................................9 (b) Oregon Department of State Lands & U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permits ....10 (c) Development Permits..............................................................................................10 (d) Street Opening Permits ..........................................................................................10 (e) Excavation and Fill Permit ....................................................................................10 (f) Tree Permits ............................................................................................................10 1.17 ―AS-BUILT SUBMITTALS ...................................................................................................... 10 (a) As-Built Drawings ..................................................................................................11 (b) EOR Responsible ....................................................................................................11 1.18 ―DESIGN STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ....................................................................................... 11 (a) Exception Submittal Requirements.........................................................................11 (b) Review Process .......................................................................................................11 (c) Appeals Process......................................................................................................12 (d) Urgent Exception Request ......................................................................................12 TABLES TABLE 1-1. PIPELINE EASEMENT WIDTH BASED ON TYPE AND SIZE OF PIPE. ................................. 6 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1A ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS APPENDIX 1B REQUIREMENTS FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS APPENDIX 1C TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT FORMAT 109-001 (January 2016) City of Salem Administrative Rules Division 001―General―Design Standards 1.1―Introduction (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Public Works Design Standards (Design Standards or Standards) is to establish minimum design parameters and practices for the City of Salem’s (City) public infrastructure and certain private infrastructure as required in Salem Revised Code (SRC) that enhance public health and safety, protect the environment, and provide for the delivery of quality infrastructure. The City reserves the right, consistent with law, to impose requirements beyond these Design Standards to address specific issues or to protect the public interest. The City manages the public infrastructure utilizing asset management principles. Infrastructure investments shall be based on life cycle costs, including the operation and maintenance costs over the life of the asset. Where appropriate, environmental and social costs also may be a factor in the decision making process. The Design Standards, Standard Construction Specifications (SCS), and the Standard Drawings are intended to be used to deliver new infrastructure that minimize life cycle costs, maximize public health and safety, protect the environment, and contribute to the quality of life in Salem. (b) Applicability. This Division of the Design Standards applies to all Design Standards now in effect or adopted hereafter. (c) Authority to Adopt. These Design Standards are authorized by SRC Chapters 20J and 70. Design Standard requirements shall be consistent with the SRC. In those cases where a conflict may exist, the SRC will take precedence. (d) Delegation of Authority. The SRC delegates authority to adopt and implement the Design Standards for Public Facilities to the Director, or the Director’s designee. The Director hereby designates the City Engineer as the City’s official to create, manage, and implement the Design Standards. (e) Scope. The City has adopted the SCS including Standard Drawings. The design, construction, and reconstruction of improvements intended for use by the public and the City, including the workmanship and materials incorporated therein, shall be in accordance with the SCS and the Standard Drawings. The City will enforce these Standards carefully and thoughtfully. They are not intended as a substitute for competent work by design professionals. The Engineer of Record (EOR) is ultimately responsible for the final design of the project. Failure to comply with these Standards may result in the City requesting additional submissions and/or revisions which can result in the delay of approvals and permit issuance. The Design Standards implement the requirements of the SRC; the City’s Infrastructure Master Plans (Master Plans); the City’s National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits; Oregon Revised
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Publicstuff and Cityworks Partner Together to Launch Philly311
    Contact: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Elizabeth Hoffman, Marketing & Business Manager [email protected] Phone: 347-442-7227 x 24 PublicStuff.com PublicStuff and Cityworks Partner Together To Launch Philly311 PublicStuff and Cityworks have partnered to create a seamless workflow integration in Philadelphia that will further optimize city services. NEW YORK, New York (September 18, 2012) –PublicStuff, the innovative web and mobile platform that gives local governments a direct line to their citizens to access relevant city information, has partnered with Cityworks, the leading GIS-centric asset and workflow management solution to seamlessly integrate both systems. The integration is part of the City of Philadelphia’s newly announced PublicStuff service request mobile and web application, Philly311. Cityworks is known and well established in many municipalities for organizing asset and workflow management processes. In cities like Philadelphia, Cityworks is used primarily by Public Works and other departments to streamline the thousands of task and work orders that are managed and cared for by the city every day, including citizen requests. While the city’s operations and maintenance needs were fulfilled, the city wanted a way for citizens to engage with the system. PublicStuff is the Saas based software solution that gives citizens a direct line to their local government to access relevant city information and have their voice heard by reporting service needs like potholes, graffiti and broken streetlights, in real time, through any device. With its complete suite of web and mobile platforms, cities are able to use the customizable PublicStuff system to manage service requests and improve citizen engagement. When PublicStuff was awarded the RFP for building out the mobile component for the City of Philadelphia’s 311 center, integrating with Cityworks was the natural next move.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC WORKS INFRASTRUCTURE: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS for the 1980S
    A CBO STUDY Public Works Infrastructure: April 1983 Policy Considerations for the 1980s NOTICE This Document Should Not Be Released Before 5 P.M. (E.D.T.) A Congress of the United States Tuesday, April 26, 1983 Ofi Congressional Budget Office PUBLIC WORKS INFRASTRUCTURE: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE 1980s Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 NOTES At the start of Chapters II through VIII, each of which deals with a single infrastructure system, a brief paragraph summarizes the prob- lems affecting that system and the associated costs, the federal government's current and possibly altered participation, and the appli- cation of several policy strategies. Unless otherwise noted, all dollar figures are expressed in constant 1982 dollars. All dates are fiscal years unless specified as calendar years. In some tables, details may not add to totals because of rounding. 11 PREFACE The nation's long-term economic growth will depend heavily on the adequacy of its public works infrastructure. In the past several years, much attention—both public and Congressional—has been drawn to the declining condition of infrastructure systems and to those systems1 capacity to accommodate future economic and population growth. This study, under- taken at the request of the Senate Committee on the Budget, assesses the needs of seven infrastructure systems and the costs of meeting those needs. The primary focus of the analysis is on the cost effectiveness of infrastruc- ture investment, a concern made particularly pressing by the constraints now affecting the federal budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works Conditions of Approval
    Public Works Conditions of Approval: What Do They Mean? Contra Costa County Public Works Department 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 313-2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Frontage Improvements ............................................... 1 Onsite Road Improvements .......................................... 2 Offsite Road Improvements .......................................... 2 Private Roads .............................................................. 2 Road Dedications ......................................................... 3 Relinquishment of Abutter's Rights of Access ................. 3 Street Lights ................................................................ 3 Landscaping ................................................................ 3 Drainage Improvements (Collect and Convey) ............... 4 Creek Mitigation Fees ................................................... 5 Creek Structure Setbacks .............................................. 6 Improvement Plans ...................................................... 6 Sight Distance.............................................................. 6 NPDES ........................................................................ 7 Provision C.3 of NPDES ............................................... 7 Advisory Notes ............................................................. 8 FEMA Flood Hazard Zone .............................................. 8 Department of Fish and Game ...................................... 8 Army Corps of Engineers .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works Operations and Maintenance (O&M)
    PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) INFRASTRUCTURE ADMINISTRATOR DEFINITION: To plan, direct, and supervise field maintenance division activities including infrastructure operations and maintenance, equipment and facility maintenance. SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED: General direction is provided by the Public Works Director. Responsibilities include direct and indirect supervision of staff. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES: The following are typical illustrations of duties encompassed by the job class, not an all-inclusive or limiting list: Essential Job Functions: Plan, organize and direct activities of the Public Works Operations and Maintenance Divisions pertaining to streets, signs and markings, sidewalks, electrical services, GIS, SCADA, building and fleet maintenance as assigned. Plan, organize, coordinate, supervise, and evaluate programs, plans services, staffing, equipment, and infrastructure of the Public Works Department. Develop and implement goals, objectives, polices, procedures, schedules, and work standards for the various operating groups within the Public Works Department. Prepare and administer the annual Operations and Maintenance Budget for assigned program areas. Research and analyze complex problems, evaluate varied information and data, and exercise sound independent judgement within established guidelines. Coordinate maintenance service programs with other City departments and with outside agencies. Establish and maintain effective working relationships while providing for the evaluation, training, and
    [Show full text]
  • Job Description: Assistant Director of Public Works
    CITY OF BELLINGHAM JOB DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: Assistant Director of Public Works E-PLAN SG:E-20 CLASS TITLE: Assistant Director CS:N FLSA:N DEPARTMENT: Public Works - Operations or Engineering EEO4CODE:OA JOB SUMMARY: Responsible for the planning, organizing, staffing, directing and controlling of the Engineering and Operations Divisions of the Public Works Department. Ensures that business practices and standards of performance are met for projects, programs, tasks and responsibilities under the purview of the Division are met and accomplished in an effective and cost-efficient manner. SUPERVISORY RELATIONSHIP: Reports to the Director of Public Works. Serves as a member of the Public Works management team. Provides supervision, guidance, and direction to the Engineering or Operations Division. Functions are managed in accordance with pertinent federal, state and local laws and regulations. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF THE JOB: 1. Provides technical, administrative and fiscal direction to the Engineering or Operations Division of the Public Works Department. This includes program planning and management, budget preparation, and personnel administration. 2. Responsible for planning, designing, construction and/or operation and maintenance of public works facilities (i.e. street and traffic control systems, water and sewer facilities, water and wastewater treatment, storm and surface water management). A. In the planning area: develops and maintains comprehensive plans for the development or maintenance and operation of public works facilities. B. In the program area: provides technical support and financial planning for the construction or maintenance and operation of public works facilities. C. In the design area: provides quality, cost-effective design for construction and maintenance projects either utilizing in-house staff or by selecting and administering the work of consultants.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Content in the Petroleum Industry — Mexico
    LOCAL CONTENT IN THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY — MEXICO Miriam Grunstein, Ph.D. Nonresident Scholar, Baker Institute Mexico Center Cybele Díaz-Wionczek Independent Consultant February 2017 © 2017 by the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, papers are reviewed by outside experts before they are released. However, the research and views expressed in this paper are those of the individual researcher(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Miriam Grunstein, Ph.D. Cybele Díaz-Wionczek “Local Content in the Petroleum Industry — Mexico” Local Content in the Petroleum Industry — Mexico 1. Introduction This paper describes the most relevant aspects of the former and current national content policy for the hydrocarbons sector in Mexico. This policy was initiated in 2008 as a result of a legislative reform that required the national oil company, Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex), to establish mandatory provisions regarding the inclusion of obligatory state requirements to include local content in its contracts. Before 2008, no local content requirements were considered mandatory. The reform resulted in the issuance in 2009 of the Strategy for Developing Suppliers, Contractors and National Content, which was implemented between 2010 and 2014. More developments followed as a result of the 2013 reform, which established mandatory local content requirements for all companies partaking in exploration and production activities, although local content requirements for deep and ultra deep-water1 operations would not contribute to the fulfilment of the overall national content goals in the Mexican hydrocarbons industry between 2025 and 2035.
    [Show full text]
  • ICS for Public Works
    ICS for Public Works Why Is ICS Important for Public Works? Before diving into why the Incident Command System (ICS) is important to public works, it is essential to understand the context through which ICS exists. ICS is a standardized management system, typically associated with on-scene emergency management operations, specifically designed to provide an integrated organizational structure that can manage the complexity and demands of single or multiple incidents. This includes taking into consideration potential jurisdictional boundaries, public and private organizations, and many other factors including facilities, equipment, personnel, procedures, and communications operating within a common organizational structure, designed to aid in the management of resources during incidents. With over 40 years of usage, ICS is considered a best practice and is used worldwide. It is the backbone of the National Incident Management System (NIMS). In California, ICS is an element of the State’s Standard Emergency Management System (SEMS), which is a state law mandating that SEMS be used in response to incidents in the field. Public works departments across the country serve their communities in a variety of ways. Depending on the size and political jurisdiction, public works services could potentially include water, storm water, electrical, solid waste, sanitary sewer, streets, transit, buildings, parks and grounds, fleet maintenance, and other activities that are essential to local government operations. Because public works agencies do not operate in a vacuum, it is essential that they actively reach out to other partner agencies (public and private) to develop strong, positive working relationships at all levels. Part of developing effective partnerships and communication is embracing ICS and implementing it wherever feasible in their own public works operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Signs Manual
    Ministry of Works and Transport, Department of Roads HIS MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL TRAFFIC SIGNS MANUAL VOLUME 1 OF 2 Traffic Engineering And Safety Unit Design Branch, Department Of Roads Ministry Of Works And Transport AUGUST 1997 Traffic Signs Manual August 1997 Page i Ministry of Works and Transport, Department of Roads CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. A INTRODUCTION 1 B LEGAL BASIS AND REGULATIONS 2 C GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF TRAFFIC SIGNS 3 D TYPES OF SIGNS AND ROAD MARKINGS 5 E DESCRIPTION; DESIGN AND USE OF SIGNS AND ROAD 6 MARKINGS E1 Traffic Speed and Signing 6 E2 Regulatory Signs 6 E2.1 Purpose & Use 6 E2.2 Sizes & Siting 6 E2.3 Traffic Speed Restriction Signs 7 E2.4 Schedule of Regulatory Signs 8 E3 Warning Signs 42 E3.1 Purpose and Use 42 E3.2 Schedule of Warning Signs 43 E4 Information Signs 92 E4.1 Direction Signs 92 E4.2 Other Information Signs 92 E4.3 Information Sign Lettering 92 E4.4 Schedule of Information Signs 94 E4.5 Schedule of Direction Signs 94 E5 Other Signs 124 E5.1 Supplementary Plates 124 E5.2 Schedule Of Supplementary Plates 124 E5.3 Traffic Light Signals 151 E5.4 Schedule Of Traffic Light Signals 153 E6 Road Markings 160 E6.1 Classes of Marking 160 E6.2 Purpose and Use 160 E6.3 Reflectorisation 160 E6.4 Road Centre Line Marking 161 E6.5 Schedule of Road Markings 163 E7 Signs at Roadworks 176 F. POSITIONING OF SIGNS AND ROAD MARKINGS 181 F1 Positioning of signs 181 F2 Siting 181 F3 Position relative to the edge of the carriageway 182 F4 Height and angle of sign plate 182 F5 Layout of Traffic Signs and Road Marking 183 Traffic Signs Manual August 1997 Page ii Ministry of Works and Transport, Department of Roads SECTION PAGE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Download City of Port Arthur, TX
    City of Port Arthur, TX Director of Public Works 44 4th St | Port Arthur, TX 77640 The Community Port Arthur is located 90 miles east of Houston on the gulf coast of Texas and is ranked as the twelfth largest port in the United States and the second largest refining port. Port Arthur is the home of three major refineries and is the important terminus of the Kansas City Southern railroad. The town has grown to almost 60,000 with a diversifying economy to sustain Port Arthur's growth. Soaring bridges spanning scenic waterways lead to outdoor adventure filled with birding, fishing and wildlife. Port Arthur unites land and sea in Southeast Texas, where their motto is “laissez les bons temps rouler,” that translates to “let the good times roll”. Port Arthur provides wetlands and Gulf beaches, salt and fresh water fishing and a comfortable year-round climate that is perfect to enjoy Sea Rim State Park, a completely natural beach. Port Arthur offers strong Cajun and other cultural influences through its cuisine and music. Government Port Arthur operates under a City Manager form of city government. The City Council is made up of a Mayor and eight Councilmembers. Four Councilmembers are elected from single member districts, two from combined districts and two at large. The two at large members are elected for three year terms and the other Councilmembers and mayor are elected for three year terms. The Position The Director of Public Works manages, supervises and coordinates the activities of the Public Works Department including street construction and maintenance, drainage construction and maintenance, water and sewer construction, engineering services, traffic systems construction and maintenance, electrical and painting services and buildings and parks/grounds maintenance; to coordinate Public Works activities with other City divisions and departments; and to provide complex staff assistance to the City Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • HLPE Report # 12
    HLPE REPORT 12 Nutrition and food systems A report by The High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition September 2017 HLPE High Level Panel of Experts HLPE Reports series #1 Price volatility and food security (2011) #2 Land tenure and international investments in agriculture (2011) #3 Food security and climate change (2012) #4 Social protection for food security (2012) #5 Biofuels and food security (2013) #6 Investing in smallholder agriculture for food security (2013) #7 Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture for food security and nutrition (2014) #8 Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems (2014) #9 Water for food security and nutrition (2015) #10 Sustainable agricultural development for food security and nutrition: what roles for livestock? (2016) #11 Sustainable forestry for food security and nutrition (2017) #12 Nutrition and food systems (2017) All HLPE reports are available at www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe 2 HLPE Steering Committee members (September 2017) Patrick Caron (Chair) Carol Kalafatic (Vice-Chair) Amadou Allahoury Louise Fresco Eileen Kennedy Muhammad Azeem Khan Bernardo Kliksberg Fangquan Mei Sophia Murphy Mohammad Saeid Noori Naeini Michel Pimbert Juan Ángel Rivera Dommarco Magdalena Sepúlveda Martin Yemefack Rami Zurayk HLPE Project Team members Jessica Fanzo (Team Leader) Mandana Arabi Barbara Burlingame Lawrence Haddad Simon Kimenju Gregory Miller Fengying Nie Elisabetta Recine Lluís Serra-Majem Dipa Sinha Coordinator of the HLPE Nathanaël Pingault This report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE) has been approved by the HLPE Steering Committee. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Committee on World Food Security, of its members, participants, or of the Secretariat.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works Officers Directory
    Public Works Officers Directory 2015 Table of Contents Municipal Public Works Officers Listings Alphabetical Listing by City with Contact Information……..………...3 Alphabetical Listing by Last Name – Index………………...................40 Correction Form/Change Request Template…………………………..……..41 League of California Cities Mission To restore and protect local control for cities through education and advocacy in order to enhance the quality of life for all Californians. 2015 Public Works Officers Directory 2 League of California Cities Alphabetical Listing by City with Contact Information City Name Title Address Zip Contact Information 11600 Air [email protected] Adelanto Thomas Thornton Public Works Superintendent Expressway 92301 P: 760-246-2300 [email protected] Director of Public Works/City P: 818-597-7329 Agoura Hills Ramiro Adeva Engineer 30001 Ladyface Court 91301 F: 818-597-7352 950 W. Mall Square [email protected] Alameda Bob Haun Public Works Director Room 110 94501 P: 510-747-7930 Albany Ray Chan Public Works Dir./City Engr. 1000 San Pablo Ave. 94706 [email protected] Alhambra Mary Chavez Director of Public Works 111 South First St 91801 [email protected] P: 949-425-2530 Aliso Viejo Shaun Pelletier Public Works Director 12 Journey Suite 100 92656 F: 949-425-3899 Alturas Joe Picotte Director of Public Works 200 West North St 96101 jpicotte @cityofalturas.org [email protected] 4381 Broadway, Ste. P: 707-647-4366 American Canyon Jason Holley Public Works Director 201 94503 [email protected] P: 530-378-6636 Anderson Jeff Kiser City Manager/Public Works Dir. 1887 Howard St 96007 F: 530-378-6666 Public Works Director/City Angels Camp David Myers Engineer P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Moscow 2018 Power, Violence and Justice:Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities.View from Russia
    Moscow 2018 Power, Violence and Justice:Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities.View from Russia. UDK 316.1 BBK 60.56 36 Approved for publication by the scientific council of FCTAS RAS and Presidium of The Russian Society of Sociologists Reviewers Dr. of History Sciences, prof. L.M. Drobizheva Dr. of Philosophy Sciences, prof. D.S. Klementiev Editorial Board: E. Ivanova, Y. Ermolaeva, I. Strel ova, P. Yuriev, N. Niks, S. Lomanterova C36 Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities. View from Russia [Electronic resource]: collected papers XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities (Toronto, Canada, July 15-21, 2018) / Editor-in-Chief V. Mansurov. Moscow: RSS; FCTAS RAS. 2018. 441 p. 1 D ROM; 12 sm system requirements: Windows XP/Vista/7/10 Title from disk label. ISBN 978-5-904804-24-4 Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities. View from Russia is a collection of papers of Russian sociologists from different regions of the Russian Federation. The papers present achievements of the Regional Affiliations and Research Committees of the Russian Society of Sociologists, which are dealing with problems of social life under conditions of the processes of the transformation, modernization and the prospects of development of the Russian society. In the chapters the book considers the methodological problems of contemporary sociology; the problems of the Childhood and Youth, Education and Religion; the important sociological aspects of Migration, Population, Deviance and Ecology; the sociology of professions and professionalism; actual problems of the social communications, problems of regions and cities are in a focus of theoretical discussions of the social sciences.
    [Show full text]