DOCSLIB.ORG

Innovation in Public Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ^ 3a 17 \mm U.S. DEPARTMENT A DIRECTORY of of TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT Urban Mass Transportation and DEMONSTRATION Administration PROJECTS Washington, D.C. 20590 Fiscal Year 1976 A DIRECTORY OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS Fiscal Year 1976 and Transition Quarter, July 1, 1975-September 30, 1976 Produced by The Office of Public Affairs U.S. Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transportation Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 Introduction This annual publication contains urban mass transportation into a Details on ordering appear in Ap- descriptions of current research, representative urban environment. pendix 2 in the back of this volume. development and demonstration This permits measurement of pas- Additional information about UM- (RD&D) projects sponsored and senger and community acceptance TA's RD&D activity also appears in funded by the U.S. Department of of the innovation, collection and Appendix 2. Transportation's Urban Mass Trans- evaluation of operating and financial UMTA's research, development portation Administration (UMTA). statistics to ascertain economic and demonstration activities are These projects are conducted viability, and an evaluation of the conducted in the areas of policy, under the authority of Section 6(a) operational performance of new technology and service methods of the Urban Mass Transportation methods or equipment in daily and techniques. Several of UMTA's Act of 1964, as amended (78 Stat. public service. component offices are involved in 302, 49 U.S.C. 1601 et. seq.). This It is UMTA's policy to make such research: Transportation Man- statute authorizes the Secretary of available to the public as readily as agement and Demonstrations, Poli- Transportation "to undertake re- possible information about re- cy and Program Development and search, development, and demon- search, development and demon- Technology Development and De- stration projects in all phases of stration activities conducted under ployment (limited research also is urban mass transportation . the Urban Mass Transportation Act directed by UMTA's Office of Civil which he determines will assist in of 1964, as amended. The principal Rights). the reduction of urban transporta- method of reporting is through This directory is divided into tion needs, the improvement of mass annual publication of the compila- subject areas according to the transportation service, or the contri- tion of reports on the status of UMTA office which directs those bution of such service toward meet- individual projects. projects. The first five chap- ing total urban transportation needs The volume dated June 30, 1972 ters—dealing with bus and para- at minimum costs." constituted an historical record of all transit, rail, new systems and auto- This activity includes "the devel- projects funded underthe Act to that mation, socio-economic and special opment, testing and demonstration point as well as projects funded projects, and safety and product of new facilities, equipment, tech- earlier under authorization of the qualification— detail research and niques and methods." Projects may Housing Act of 1961. This volume is development activities of the Office be conducted in-house, by public available from the National Techni- of Technology Development and bodies through grants, through cal Information Service (NTIS), Deployment. Chapter 6, Service and contracts with private firms, or access number PB-213-228. Methods Demonstrations, details through working agreements with Volumes of fiscal years 1973, 1974 projects conducted by the Office of other Federal departments and and 1975 serve as supplements to Transportation Management and agencies. UMTA generally initiates the comprehensive 1972 volume Demonstrations; Chapter 7, Policy and plans these RD&D projects and since they contain only updated and Program Development, details performs analytical tasks as well. descriptions of those projects active projects conducted by the office of Research projects are intended to in the fiscal year cited in addition to the same name. produce information about possible projects initiated or completed dur- improvements in urban mass trans- ing that year. Copies of these portation. The products of research volumes are available from the U.S. projects are reports or studies. Superintendent of Documents. Development projects involve Most of the completed projects Note: fabrication, testing, and evaluation included in this volume have reports The dates listed underthe "Schedule" section of project descriptions usually indicate the of new equipment, facilities, sys- already published or in the publica- period of time from approval by the UMTA tion tems or methods. The products of process. The Urban Mass Administrator to receipt of a draft of the final development projects include proto- Transportation Administration does report. The "Funding" section represents, type hardware, test results, and not distribute these reports unless except when otherwise indicated, Federal reports. so indicated. They are available from money provided by UMTA. This volume focuses on activity during the period July 1, Demonstration projects intro- the National Technical Information 1975-September30, 1976. Funding recipients duce, on an experimental basis, new Service, U.S. Department of Com- are listed as 'contractor' although some may methods, equipment or systems of merce, Springfield, Virginia, 22161. in fact be grantees. ii 7 Table of Contents Chapter I BUS AND PARATRANSIT 1 1. Bus and Paratransit Technology 1 • Design of a Modern 40-Foot Transit Bus (TRANSBUS) 1 FL-06-0012, IT-06-0025, MO-06-0009, NY-06-0045 • Small Bus Requirements, Concepts and Specifications 2 IT-06-0074 • Wheelchair Access to Current Buses 3 M 1-06-001 • Evaluation of the Florida Hybrid Bus 3 FL-06-0014 • Low Pollution Paratransit Vehicle 3 NY-06-0043, MA-06-0052, CA-06-0079, CA-06-0080, IL-06-0037 • Flywheel Energy Storage Systems 4 IT-06-0117 • Evaluation of Diesel Propulsion in Fleet Taxicabs 6 NY-06-0049, MA-06-0066 2. Automatic Vehicle Monitoring (AVM) and Communications Systems 6 • Advanced Area-Coverage Automatic Vehicle Monitoring 6 MA-06-0041 3. Dial-A-Ride Systems and Areawide Demand-Responsive Transit 7 • Rochester Demonstration Computer Software Support 8 MA-06-0071, DC-06-0141, DC-06-0099-02, 04, 05 • Dial-A-Ride Systems Analyses 8 VA-06-0024 • Cost Benefit Studies for Areawide Demand-Responsive Transportation 8 IT-06-0150, MA-06-0054 Chapter II RAIL TRANSIT 9 1. Rapid Rail Vehicles and Systems 9 • Urban Rapid Rail Vehicles and Systems Program 10 IT-06-0026 • Stored Energy (Flywheel) Propulsion for Rapid Rail Cars 12 NY-06-0006 • Railcar Standardization 13 IT-06-0131 Commuter Rail Vehicles and Systems 13 • Dual-Power Gas Turbine/Electric Commuter Rail Cars 13 NY-06-0005 3. Light Rail Vehicles and Systems 14 4. Urban Rail Supporting Technology (URST) 15 • Environmental Control in Underground Rapid Transit Systems 18 DC-06-0010 Chapter III NEW SYSTEMS AND AUTOMATION 19 1. Automated Guideway Transit (AGT) 19 • Advanced Group Rapid Transit System 20 CA-06-0094, PA-06-0036, CO-06-0008 • Automated Guideway Transit Technology 22 CA-06-0071, CA-06-0088, CA-06-0089, CA-06-0091, DC-06-0142, MD-06-0022, MA-06-0048, VA-06-0025, VA-06-0041 others , DOT-TSC-1220, to be assigned iii 2. The AGT Applications Program 23 • Morgantown Personal Rapid Transit Demonstration Project 23 MA-06-0026, WV-03-0006, WV-06-0003, WV-06-0005, WV-06-0006, WV-06-0007 • Downtown People Mover (DPM) Project 25 to be determined 3. Accelerating Walkways 25 • Accelerating Walkway System 25 IT-06-0126 Chapter IV SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND SPECIAL PROJECTS , 26 1. Studies in Support of Policy 26 • Technological Qualifications and Operational Certification Guidelines 26 MA-06-0064 • Safety in Urban Mass Transportation 27 RI-06-0005 • Life Cycle Costing Feasibility Study 27 RI-06-0007 • Life Cycle Costing of Large Buses 27 VA-06-0039 • Life Cycle Cost Model for Comparing AGT and Conventional Transit Alternatives 28 CA-06-0090 • Effects of Alternative Metropolitan Development 28 IT-06-0129 2. Systems Development Projects 28 • Automated Information Directory System Prototype Development 28 DC-06-0154 • Automated Information Directory System Algorithm and Data Base Establishment 29 MD-06-0013-01 • Time-Calibrated Self-Cancelling Ticket 29 IT-06-0125, RI-06-0009 • Elderly and Handicapped Technology— Safety of Wheelchair Loading and Securement Systems 29 CA-06-0098 3. Experimental Design 29 • Experimental Design and Analysis Support 29 IT-06-0130 • Experimental Design for Pneumatic Transport System in Tunneling 30 DC-06-0153 4. Socio-Economic Analyses 30 • Analysis of Urban Transportation Needs with Implication for AGT Systems 31 MD-1 1-0001 Chapter V SAFETY AND PRODUCT QUALIFICATION 32 • Transit Systems Material Information Bank 32 MA-06-0051 • Safety and System Assurance Training Program 32 DC-06-0139 • Safety and System Assurance Support 33 DC-06-0123 • Mass Transit Safety and Systems Assurance 33 MA-06-0060 iv Chapter VI SERVICE AND METHODS DEMONSTRATIONS 34 1. Priority Treatment for Transit and Other High Occupancy Vehicles 35 • Santa Monica Freeway Concurrent Flow Reserved Bus and Carpool Lane— Los Angeles, California . .35 CA-06-0083, CA-06-0086 • Miami l-95/Northwest 7th Avenue Bus-Carpool Priority System 36 FL-06-0006 • Corridor Improvements in Houston, Texas 36 TX-06-0018 • Auto Restricted Zone/Multi-User Vehicle Systems Study 37 VA-06-0042 • Urban Goods Movement Demonstration Project Design 38 IL-06-0030 • Transit Mall Study 38 DOT-TSC-0181 2. Paratransit 39 • Coordinated Paratransit Service Demonstration Project 39 TN-06-0006 • Paratransit Service Innovations 39 DC-06-0120 • Integrated Demand-Responsive, Fixed-Route Transit Systems 39 NY-06-0048 • Integrated Taxi/Fixed-Route Transit System 40 CT-06-0007-1 • Ride-Sharing Paratransit Agency Study 40 PA-06-0035 • Arlington, Virginia Shared-Ride Taxi Study 41 VA-06-0032 • Nassau County Shared Taxi Demonstration 41 NY-06-0059 • Taxicab Feeder to Bus Service 41 LA-06-0002 • Feasibility Study of Multiple Trip Subscription Bus Service 42 CA-06-0084 • Vanpool Demonstration Program 42 VA-06-0033 3.
Recommended publications
  • Rules and Procedures

    Rules and Procedures

    BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT RULES AND PROCEDURES Rule 403 October 30, 2015 HACKNEY CARRIAGE RULES AND REGULATIONS SECTION 1: OVERVIEW I. Definitions a. Boston Police Officer: An individual appointed by the Police Commissioner to carry out the functions of the Boston Police Department, including but not limited to, the preservation of the public peace, the protection of life and property, the prevention of crime, the arrest and prosecution of violators of the law, the proper enforcement of all laws and ordinances and the effective delivery of police services. b. Hackney Carriage: A vehicle used or designed to be used for the conveyance of persons for hire from place to place within the city of Boston, except a street or elevated railway car or a trackless trolley vehicle, within the meaning of Massachusetts General Laws chapter 163 section 2, or a motor vehicle, known as a jitney, operated in the manner and for the purposes set forth in Massachusetts General Laws chapter 159 A, or a sight-seeing automobile licensed under Chapter 399 of the Acts of 1931. Also known as a taxicab or taxi. c. Inspector of Carriages: A superior officer of the Boston Police Department assigned by the Police Commissioner to command the Hackney Carriage Unit. d. Licensed Hackney Driver: An individual, also referred to as a “Driver,” granted a license to operate a Hackney Carriage by the Police Commissioner. e. Medallion Owner: An individual, also referred to as an “Owner,” who has been deemed a suitable individual by the Police Commissioner to own a Hackney Carriage Medallion and who has purchased one or more such Medallions.
  • Renewal Licensing Division New Application for Taxicab/Limousine Owner’S License Replacement Provide Vin of Vehicle Being Removed for Replacement______

    Renewal Licensing Division New Application for Taxicab/Limousine Owner’S License Replacement Provide Vin of Vehicle Being Removed for Replacement______

    RENEWAL LICENSING DIVISION NEW APPLICATION FOR TAXICAB/LIMOUSINE OWNER’S LICENSE REPLACEMENT PROVIDE VIN OF VEHICLE BEING REMOVED FOR REPLACEMENT_____________________ A Taxicab/Limousine Owner’s License does not entitle owner to drive a vehicle without also obtaining a Taxicab/Limousine Driver’s License. This application MUST be filled out for each and every taxicab/limousine applied for: Date: __________________________________ Company Name/Owner: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________________________________________, the undersigned, hereby applies to the Town of Dover for a license to operate a public taxicab/limousine as desired below within the Town of Dover. The following questions MUST be answered: Home Phone____________________________________ Are you legally eligible to work in the United States? YES NO Business Phone__________________________________ Residential Address:______________________________________________________ Fax No._________________________________________ ______________________________________________________ e-mail address: __________________________________ Attach identification of proof that you are at least 21 years of age. If partnership, the following questions MUST be answered: Give firm name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Location:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  • Chapter 25 Vehicles for Hire

    Chapter 25 Vehicles for Hire

    CHAPTER 25 VEHICLES FOR HIRE1 Art. I. In General, §§ 25-1. -- 25-15. Art. II. Taxicabs, § 25-16 -- 25-53. Div. 1. Generally, §§ 25-16. -- 25-30. Div. 2. Business License, §§ 25-31. -- 25-45. Div. 3. Driver’s License, §§ 25-46. -- 25-53. ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Secs. 25-1. -- 25-15. Reserved. ARTICLE II. TAXICABS DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 25-16. Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them: Motor Vehicle for Hire. The term “motor vehicle for hire” shall mean a motor vehicle not equipped with a taximeter designed to carry seven (7) or less persons for public hire at an hourly rate. Taxicab. The word “taxicab” shall mean a motor vehicle for transportation of seven (7) or less persons for hire upon a trip or mileage basis. (Code 1957, § 7.131) Cross reference - Definitions and rules of construction generally, §§ 1-2. Sec. 25-17. Lost Articles. Every taxicab driver, immediately after the termination of any hiring or employment, shall carefully search such taxicab for any property lost or left therein, and any such property unless sooner claimed or delivered to the owner shall be taken to the headquarters of the Police Department and deposited with the officer in charge within twenty-four (24) hours after the finding of such article. (Code 1957, § 7.147) 1 Cross reference – Traffic and motor vehicles, Ch. 22. 25-1 Detroit_906167_1 Sec. 25-18. Passengers. Every taxicab driver shall have the right to demand payment of the legal fare in advance, and may refuse employment until so prepaid, but no taxicab driver shall otherwise refuse or neglect to convey any orderly person upon request anywhere in the City unless previously engaged or unable to do so.
  • Transit Element to the Premium and Primary Transit Networks

    Transit Element to the Premium and Primary Transit Networks

    Table of Contents I. Introduction …………………………………………………………………....1 II. Summary …………………………………………………………………….....3 III. Policies, Implementation Actions and Performance Measures……....6 IV. The Transit Network…………….….…………………………………...…18 o Characteristics of a Primary Transit Network o What Makes a Transit Network Function? o Networks, Key Characteristics, and Improvements o Implications of the Increase in Bus Service o Paratransit V. Planned Rail System Improvement……………………………….…...…...28 o Metrorail System Capacity Improvements o Northern Virginia High-Capacity Transit Improvements o Station Enhancements and Access Improvements VI. Program Implementation Strategies.……………………………………. 31 o Transit Development and Coordination Plan o Regional Coordination Appendix A: The Existing Transit System ……………………………………33 o Systems Managed by Arlington, WMATA or NVTC o Bus Facilities o Additional Public Transit o Private Commuter, Employee/Student, and Airport Service o Paratransit and Taxicab o Bikeshare o Department of Human Services and other Specialized Transportation I. Introduction The Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Goals and Policies document specifies three general policies that form the foundation of the MTP and, therefore, transportation in Arlington in the years ahead: integrating transportation with land use, supporting the design and operation of complete streets, and managing travel demand and transportation systems. Between 2015 and 2030, Arlington County population is projected to increase 25 percent and employment is projected to increase by 20 percent. Increasing and enhancing transit options is a prerequisite to accommodating continued long-term growth in Arlington’s population and business activity. As noted in the MTP, the integration of transit and land use, the organization of community development around high quality transit service, has been a foundational policy for the Metrorail corridors in the County for more than 30 years.
  • 1- 1 United States Court of Appeals 2 For

    1- 1 United States Court of Appeals 2 For

    09-2901-cv Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade v. City of New York 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term 2009 5 (Argued: January 22, 2010 Decided: July 27, 2010) 6 Docket No. 09-2901-cv 7 -----------------------------------------------------x 8 METROPOLITAN TAXICAB BOARD OF TRADE; MIDTOWN CAR LEASING 9 CORP.; BATH CAB CORP.; RONART LEASING CORP.; GEID CAB 10 CORP.; LINDEN MAINTENANCE CORP.; and ANN TAXI, INC., 11 12 Plaintiffs-Appellees, 13 14 MIDTOWN OPERATING CORP., SWEET IRENE TRANSPORTATION CO. 15 INC., OSSMAN ALI, and KEVIN HEALY, 16 17 Plaintiffs, 18 19 -- v. -- 20 21 CITY OF NEW YORK; MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG, in his offical 22 capacity as Mayor of the City of New York; THE NEW YORK 23 CITY TAXICAB & LIMOUSINE COMMISSION; MATTHEW W. DAUS, in 24 his official capacity as Commissioner, Chair, and Chief 25 Executive Officer of the TLC; PETER SCHENKMAN, in his 26 official capacity as Assistant Commissioner of the TLC 27 for Safety & Emissions; ANDREW SALKIN, in his official 28 capacity as First Deputy Commissioner of TLC, 29 30 Defendants-Appellants. 31 -----------------------------------------------------x 32 33 B e f o r e : WALKER, STRAUB, and LIVINGSTON, Circuit 34 Judges. 35 The City of New York, the New York City Taxicab & Limousine 36 Commission, and City officials appeal the grant of a preliminary 37 injunction by the United States District Court for the Southern 38 District of New York (Paul A. Crotty, Judge), that enjoined the 39 enforcement of the City’s recently amended lease rates for -1- 1 taxicabs on the basis that the new rules are likely preempted 2 under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (“EPCA”), 49 U.S.C.
  • Taxicab Franchise Ordinance

    Taxicab Franchise Ordinance

    ORDINANCE NO. 3964 ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA ADDING CHAPTER 6-87, TAXICAB SERVICES TO THE SANTA ROSA CITY CODE THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 6-87 is added to the Santa Rosa City Code to read in full as follows: “CHAPTER 6-87 TAXICAB SERVICES SECTIONS: 6-87.010 FINDINGS AND PURPOSE 6-87.020 DEFINITIONS 6-87.030 AUTHORITY TO ISSUE RULES AND REGULATIONS 6-87.040 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 6-87.050 REQUIREMENT OF FRANCHISE AGREEMENT 6-87.060 GRANTING OF NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT 6-87.070 FRANCHISE TERMS AND CONDITIONS 6-87.080 SUPERVISION AUTHORITY 6-87.090 TERMINATION OF FRANCHISE 6-87.100 APPEAL OF FRANCHISE DENIAL OR TERMINATION 6-87.110 RATES, FEES AND CHARGES 6-87.120 FAILURE TO OBTAIN FRANCHISE AGREEMENT - VIOLATION 6-87.130 ZONING CLEARANCE REQUIRED 6-87.140 INDEMNIFICATION OF CITY 6-87.150 VEHICLE PERMIT APPLICATION 6-87.160 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION 6-87.170 EQUIPMENT AND CONDITIONS 6-87.180 VEHICLE MARKINGS AND INSIGNIA 6-87.190 COMMERCIAL SIGNS AND ADVERTISEMENTS 6-87.200 VEHICLE INSPECTION 6-87.210 SALE OR TRANSFER OF BUSINESS 6-87.220 TRANSFER OF VEHICLE 6-87.230 SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF VEHICLE PERMIT 6-87.240 TAXI DRIVER PERMIT APPLICATION 6-87.250 DRIVER PERMIT 6-87.260 CONTENTS OF DRIVER PERMIT 6-87.270 SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF DRIVER’S PERMIT 6-87.280 NUMBER OF PERMITS 6-87.290 REPLACEMENT OF LOST OR DESTROYED PERMITS 6-87.300 CHANGE OF EMPLOYMENT BY DRIVER Ord.
  • OMAHA AIRPORT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION for Hire (Taxicab

    OMAHA AIRPORT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION for Hire (Taxicab

    OMAHA AIRPORT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION For Hire (Taxicab, Limousine and/or Open Class Carriers) Trip User Fee _____________________________ WHEREAS, the Airport Authority of the City of Omaha (“Omaha Airport Authority”) is empowered to regulate the use of Eppley Airfield and its facilities (“Airport”); and WHEREAS, the Omaha Airport Authority is charged with managing the day-to-day ground transportation operations and regulating the provisions of commercial ground transportation services at the Airport and has implemented, and from time to time modifies, a series of Commercial Ground Transportation Rules & Regulations (“CGTRR”) in furtherance thereof; and WHEREAS , the Taxicab, Limousine and/or Open Class Carriers (“Company”) as defined herein, among other things, is in the business of conducting one-type or multiple types of for hire transportation services, as described herein, to patrons arriving and/or departing from the Airport; and WHEREAS , the Company derives direct economic benefit from the Airport as a result of said business; and WHEREAS , the Company is permitted to do business by all applicable authorities including but not limited to those listed in Section 10.2, Applicability, of the CGTRR including Federal Department of Transportation (“DOT”), Nebraska Public Service Commission (“PSC”), and the City of Omaha, Nebraska (“City”); and WHEREAS , the Company is permitted to do business by the Omaha Airport Authority as defined in Section 10.4, Permissions, of the CGTRR and has a valid Passenger Carrier Permit authorizing the Company
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    DMJM+HARRIS Monorail Technology Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES 6 LIST OF TABLES 6 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 2.0 PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT 12 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 12 4.0 METHODOLOGY 12 5.0 INITIAL SCREENING OF TECHNOLOGIES 14 5.1 Insufficient Information Available for Determination 14 5.2 Systems No Longer Marketed 14 5.3 System Characteristics Inconsistent with Needs of Montgomery County 15 5.4 Systems Recommended for Further Evaluation 16 5.4.1 Systems in Operation 16 5.4.2 Systems in Development 16 5.5 Classification of Candidate Systems 17 6.0 REFINEMENT OF LIST 18 7.0 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS 24 8.0 COMPARISON BETWEEN MODES OF TRANSPORTATION 25 8.1 Overview 25 8.2 Proposed Measures of Effectiveness 25 8.2.1 Capacity 25 8.2.2 Speed 25 8.2.3 Cost 25 8.3 Other Factors 26 12/18/2001 Final 2 DMJM+HARRIS Monorail Technology Assessment 8.3.1 Automation 26 8.3.2 Expandability 26 8.3.3 Maintenance 26 8.3.4 Yard and Shop 26 8.3.5 Safety 26 8.3.6 Compatibility 26 8.3.7 Maneuverability 27 8.3.8 Visual impacts 27 9.0 PROJECT REVIEW TEAM INPUT 27 9.1 General Concerns Regarding Monorail Technologies 27 9.2 Evaluation of Measures of Effectiveness 28 10.0 SYSTEMS REVIEWED IN DETAIL 28 10.1 OTG HighRoad 28 10.1.1 Background/System Description 28 10.1.2 Existing Locations 28 10.1.3 Vehicle/Guide way/Station Description 28 10.1.4 Capacity 30 10.1.5 Costs 30 10.1.6 Feasibility 30 10.1.7 Environmental Considerations 31 10.2 Futrex 32 10.2.1 Background/System Description 32 10.2.2 Existing Locations 32 10.2.3 Vehicle/Guide way/Station Description 32
  • Metropolitan Taxicab Reveals Hurdles Posed by Federal Preemption to State and Local Environmental Initiatives

    Metropolitan Taxicab Reveals Hurdles Posed by Federal Preemption to State and Local Environmental Initiatives

    Volume 21 Issue 2 Article 4 2010 It's Not Easy Green: Metropolitan Taxicab Reveals Hurdles Posed by Federal Preemption to State and Local Environmental Initiatives Paul Liebeskind Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons Recommended Citation Paul Liebeskind, It's Not Easy Green: Metropolitan Taxicab Reveals Hurdles Posed by Federal Preemption to State and Local Environmental Initiatives, 21 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 325 (2010). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj/vol21/iss2/4 This Casenote is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Environmental Law Journal by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Liebeskind: It's Not Easy Green: Metropolitan Taxicab Reveals Hurdles Posed b 2010] IT'S NOT EASY BEING GREEN: METROPOLITAN TAXICAB REVEALS HURDLES POSED BY FEDERAL PREEMPTION TO STATE AND LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES I. INTRODUCTION Being green has never before been so popular.1 From the su- permarket to the office park, and from the classroom to the con- 2 struction site, a wave of environmentalism is sweeping the nation. The justifications for going "green" range from the selfish to the altruistic: cutting energy costs during hard economic times, mitigat- ing the country's dependence on foreign oil, and combating cli- 3 mate change through the reduction of so-called carbon footprints. Regardless of why many Americans are becoming environmentally conscious, scientists welcome this behavioral shift because of the 4 harmful implications of maintaining the status quo.
  • Standard Rules for Taxicab Rates November 16, 2016

    Standard Rules for Taxicab Rates November 16, 2016

    Standard Rules for Taxicab Rates November 16, 2016 I. Legislation Passenger Transportation Act section 7(1)(g): the board may…make rules respecting (i) rates that are or may be charged by a licensee, (ii) any rules or practices of a licensee relating to those rates, and (iii) any tariff of those rates II. Purpose To establish a core set of rules governing taxicab rates. III. Standard Rules Governing Taxicab Rates The rules below apply to passenger transportation licensees that operate taxicabs in British Columbia. A. Board-Approved Rates 1. Companies may only charge rates that are approved in writing by the Passenger Transportation Board. B. Metered Taxi Rates Use of Taxi Meters 2. A taximeter in a taxicab must: (a) be capable of calculating and displaying a fare based on time and distance; and (b) have a fare display that a passenger with normal eyesight seated in the rear of the taxicab is able to read at all times. 3. A traditional (mechanical or electronic) taximeter must be produced by a recognized taximeter company. 4. A mobile app may only be used as a “taximeter” if it complies with the “BC Taxi Soft Meter Rule,” as amended from time to time. Standard Rules for Taxicab Rates Adjustment of Taximeters 5. Taximeters must be adjusted to calculate accurately the current Board approved metered rate. Testing the Accuracy of Taximeters 6. Licensees are responsible for ensuring that taximeters in their vehicles are tested and accurate at all times. 7. A taximeter in a vehicle is considered accurate if (a) on a road test, the distance computed by the taximeter is within 2% of the actual distance travelled; and (b) on a time test, the time computed by the taximeter is within 2% of the actual time.
  • LIMOUSINE, TAXICAB, and TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY ACT Act 345 of 2016

    LIMOUSINE, TAXICAB, and TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY ACT Act 345 of 2016

    LIMOUSINE, TAXICAB, AND TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY ACT Act 345 of 2016 AN ACT to regulate transportation network companies, taxicabs, and certain limousines in this state; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state officers and entities; to prescribe penalties and provide remedies; and to repeal acts and parts of acts. History: 2016, Act 345, Eff. Mar. 21, 2017. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 257.2101 Short title. Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "limousine, taxicab, and transportation network company act". History: 2016, Act 345, Eff. Mar. 21, 2017. 257.2102 Definitions. Sec. 2. As used in this act: (a) "Department" means the department of licensing and regulatory affairs. (b) "Dispatch system" means any hardware, software, mobile device, or online-enabled application used by a limousine carrier or a taxicab carrier to connect limousine drivers or taxicab drivers to potential passengers. (c) "Dispatch system provider" means a person operating in this state that uses any device, method, means, or arrangement, including a dispatch system, to connect potential passengers with a limousine carrier, taxicab carrier, limousine driver, or taxicab driver. Dispatch system provider does not include a limousine carrier or a taxicab carrier. (d) "Limousine" means a self-propelled motor vehicle used in the carrying of passengers and the baggage of the passengers for hire with a seating capacity of 8 passengers or fewer, including the driver. Limousine does not include a commercial vehicle. Limousine also does not include a vehicle operated by any of the following: (i) A county, city, township, or village as provided by law, or other authority incorporated under 1963 PA 55, MCL 124.351 to 124.359.
  • Taxicab Regulations

    Taxicab Regulations

    TAXICAB REGULATIONS ISSUED BY THE TOWN OF BROOKLINE TRANSPORTATION BOARD In cooperation with the BROOKLINE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BROOKLINE POLICE DEPARTMENT BROOKLINE HEALTH DEPARTMENT Effective July 1, 2015 Transportation Board Brookline Department of Public Works Joshua Safer, Chairman Andrew M. Pappastergion, Commissioner Pamela Zelnick, Vice Chairman Peter M. Ditto, Director – DPW Engineering/Transportation Christopher Dempsey Kevin Johnson, Director – DPW Highways & Sanitation Guustaaf C.M. Driessen, PE Todd M. Kirrane, Transportation Administrator Scott Englnader Ali Tali, PE Brookline Health Department Ray Cunningham, Division of Weights & Measures Brookline Police Department Chief Daniel C. O’Leary Deputy Superintendent Myles Murphy Sergeant Michael Murphy 1 I. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE A. Authority These Taxicab Regulations are promulgated under the authority vested in the Brookline Transportation Board by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Chapter 317 of the Acts of 1974. B. Purpose of Regulations 1. It is the purpose of these regulations to provide for the safe, fair, and efficient operation of taxicabs in the Town of Brookline, and to promote competition among taxicab companies for the benefit of the public. As “common carriers,” taxicabs are required to serve everyone who is able to pay and to satisfy specific service standards. Standards are established in the following regulations for the licensing and inspection of taxicabs, the inspection of taximeters, the examination of applicants for a license to drive such taxicabs, the licensing of taxicab drivers, and the permitting of taxicab dispatch services. These Taxicab regulations are promulgated to ensure that the public health, safety and welfare is protected, public needs are provided for, and public convenience is promoted in the Town of Brookline.