DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Government Review in the Selby District Council Area, North Yorkshire Additional Research Local Government Review in the S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Government Review in the Selby District Council Area, North Yorkshire Additional Research Local Government Review in the S Local Government Review in the Selby District Council Area, North Yorkshire Additional Research Research Study Conducted by MORI for The Boundary Committee for England April 2004 Contents Page Introduction 5 Executive Summary 11 1. Attitudes to Local Governance 13 2. Attitudes to Issues under Review 19 3. Preferred Patterns of Local Government 23 Option A 31 Option B 35 Option C 39 Option D 43 4. Preferred New Council Name 47 5. Community Identity 49 APPENDICES 1. Option Showcards 2. Research Methodology 3. Definitions of Social Grade and Area 4. Marked-up Questionnaires Selby district Tadcaster North-east Selby 3 Introduction This report presents the findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England in the Selby District Council area. The aim of the research was to establish residents’ views about alternative patterns of unitary local government. Background to the Research In May 2003, the Government announced that a referendum would take place in autumn 2004 in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions on whether there should be elected regional assemblies. The Government indicated that, where a regional assembly is set up, the current two-tier structure of local government - district, borough or city councils (called in this report ‘districts’) and county councils - should be replaced by a single tier of ‘unitary’ local authorities. In June 2003, the Government directed The Boundary Committee for England (‘the Committee’) to undertake an independent review of local government in two-tier areas in the three regions, with a view to recommending possible unitary structures to be put before affected local people in a referendum at a later date. MORI was commissioned by COI Communications, on behalf of the Committee, to help it gauge local opinion. The research was in two stages. First, in summer 2003, MORI researched local residents’ views about local government and how they identify with their local community. These findings can be found at the Committee’s web site (www.boundarycommittee.org.uk) and MORI’s web site (www.mori.com). The findings were taken into account by the Committee in formulating its draft recommendations for consultation. The second part of the research, which took place in Stage Three of the Committee’s review, has been primarily concerned with residents’ reactions to the Committee’s preliminary proposals and the reasons for local people’s preferences. It is with the second part of the research that this report is concerned. Coverage of Main Research MORI undertook research in all 44 two-tier districts in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions. Within each district, at least 300 face-to-face interviews were carried out in-home, between 1 December 2003 and 23 February 2004. A total of 13,676 interviews took place across the three regions. 5 Additional Interviews In addition to the main research described above, the Committee also asked MORI to undertake further research where it considered it needed further evidence. This related to its reviews in Cheshire, Lancashire and North Yorkshire. First, in districts which the Committee identified may be split in the event of local government reorganisation, it asked MORI to interview additional respondents in order to gauge in more detail their views about options which would directly affect them. The districts were Selby (North Yorkshire), Crewe & Nantwich and Vale Royal (Cheshire), and Fylde, Rossendale, West Lancashire and Wyre (Lancashire). A total of some 2,000 additional interviews took place across these areas. This report is concerned with the surveys of residents in Selby district, North Yorkshire, and covers both the main research and the additional interviews. Further details of the approach taken in Selby is set out later in this Introduction. In addition, MORI was asked to interview a representative sample of some 300 residents in each of four single-tier councils adjacent to review areas - Sefton, Wigan, Wirral and York. Style Protocols in this Report We have adopted a number of protocols throughout this report: • Unless otherwise stated, reference is made to districts rather than towns. For example ‘Selby’ refers to the District Council area of that name, rather than to the town. • Two-tier borough, city or district council areas are referred to as ‘districts’. • The Boundary Committee for England is referred to as ‘the Committee’. • CC refers to ‘County Council’, BC to ‘Borough Council’, MBC to ‘Metropolitan Borough Council’ and DC to ‘District Council’. • An asterisk in a table or chart refers to a percentage between zero and 0.5. • Definitions of ‘social grade’, and ‘urban’ and ‘rural’ areas, are provided in Appendix 3. • ‘Review’ refers to the Committee’s review of local government. • Some figures in charts and tables, and in the marked-up questionnaires at Appendix 4, may not add up to 100%. Occasionally figures may also vary by 1%. In both cases, this is due to rounding. The definitive figures may be found in the computer tabulations provided under separate cover. • Base sizes have been given throughout this report. Where the base is under 50, considerable caution should be applied when making any inferences. 6 The North Yorkshire County Council Area The 7 This Report This report presents MORI’s findings in the Selby District Council area, North Yorkshire (in the Yorkshire and the Humber region). The Selby research had two components, each of which took place in-home, face to face, between 1 December 2003 and 23 February 2004. First, as part of the main research, 313 interviews took place across the district. Second, MORI undertook further interviews in two areas in the north of the district in order to bring the total number of interviews in each of those areas to around 200 (including the relatively small number of interviews which had already taken place as part of the main research). The two areas were: Tadcaster (the District Council wards of Tadcaster East and Tadcaster West) and North-east Selby (the District Council wards of Appleton Roebuck, Riccall with Escrick and North Duffield). In Tadcaster, MORI interviewed 30 residents as part of the main research, together with 180 interviews as part of the additional research, making a total of 210. In North-east Selby, we interviewed 19 residents as part of the main research, together with 188 interviewed as part of the additional research, making a total of 207. In this report we have often reported separately on the data from Selby district as a whole, Tadcaster and North-east Selby. When interpreting the data it is important to bear in mind that the additional interviews were organised as a separate survey from the main research. In each case, quotas were set by age, gender and work status using 2001 Census data. Data have been weighted back to the known demographic profile of each district by age, gender and work status. The methodology applied in this research, along with showcards showing the options put forward for consultation and marked- up questionnaires, are set out in the appendices to this report. The marked-up questionnaires reflect the findings as follows: • The main research in Selby as a whole (313 interviews); • Interviews in Tadcaster from the main research and the additional research (210 interviews); • Interviews in North-east Selby from the main research and the additional research (207 interviews). Full computer tabulations have been provided separately. County-wide reports for each county under review, and summary reports for each district, have also been provided under separate cover. 8 Publication of the Data As part of our standard terms and conditions, the publication of the data in this report is subject to the advance approval of MORI. This would only be refused on the grounds of inaccuracy or misinterpretation of the findings. MORI Contact Details Simon Atkinson, Research Director Vickie Blair, Senior Research Executive Tamara Burrows, Research Executive Emma Holloway, Senior Research Executive Neil Wholey, Senior Research Executive 79-81 Borough Road London SE1 1FY Tel: 020 7347 3000 Fax: 020 7347 3800 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.mori.com © MORI/20362 9 Executive Summary Considering Boundary Changes • As in North Yorkshire generally, the most important issues which Selby residents consider should be taken into account when deciding how council boundaries should be changed are the quality and the cost of services. Other important factors are the need for accountability to local people and responding to local people’s wishes. These four factors are also the most important in both Tadcaster and North-east Selby though, in the latter case, residents place less priority on the cost of services. The Options • Respondents were briefed during the interview about the review of local government and shown cards setting out the main patterns of unitary local government on which the Committee consulted (Appendix 1). The options are: - Option A: a single unitary council covering the whole of the county. - Option B (four unitary councils): - Craven and Harrogate districts combined; - Hambleton and Richmondshire districts combined; - Ryedale and Scarborough districts combined; and - Selby district and East Riding of Yorkshire combined. - Option C (three unitary councils): - Craven and Harrogate districts combined; - Hambleton, Richmondshire, Ryedale and Scarborough districts combined; and - Selby district and East Riding of Yorkshire combined. - Option D (three unitary councils): - Hambleton, Ryedale and Scarborough districts combined; - Craven, Harrogate and Richmondshire districts combined; and - Selby district and East Riding of Yorkshire combined. Most Preferred Option • There are marked distinctions between Selby residents’ views on alternative patterns of unitary local government and those held in most of the rest of North Yorkshire. Overall, there is a preference in North Yorkshire for the Committee’s Option B: across the county, it is preferred by one in three residents.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joint Position Statement Between the City of York and Selby District Council in Relation to the Housing Market Area, April 2020
    Joint Position Statement between the City of York and Selby District Council in relation to the Housing Market Area, April 2020 Introduction 1. This statement seeks to clarify the position agreed between the City of York Council and Selby District Council through the Duty to Co-operate in relation to the Housing Market Area. Specifically, the statement seeks to: provide further clarification that any links between York and Selby only extend to part of the Selby area and that this is considered to support the approach taken by the Councils through the Duty to Co-operate to meet their own objectively assessed housing needs within their own administrative areas; and to clarify that both Council’s continue to maintain the position reached through the Duty to Co-operate that through the preparation of the York Local Plan and its submission and more recently with the review of the Selby Local Plan that it is not practical to seek to align the preparation of the two Plans and to consider housing needs jointly across the HMA. Preparation of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) 2. The 2004 Act refers to a Local Planning Authority’s (LPA) ‘area’ and it is clear that the statutory duty for an LPA is and must be in relation to their area. Thus the primary duty of the LPA is to assess the needs of their local authority area. 3. Paragraph 47 of the NPPF (2012) requires Local Plans to meet the full objectively assessed need in the Housing Market Area (HMA). Paragraph 159 of the NPPF helps clarify this, in that it requires LPAs to have a clear understanding of housing needs ‘in their area’.
    [Show full text]
  • Northallerton and Richmond Duty Solicitor Scheme Consultation
    19th July 2019 To all Duty Solicitors on Northallerton & Richmond and York & Selby Schemes Dear Duty Solicitor Duty Solicitor Schemes This consultation is in response to the HMCTS announcement that Northallerton Magistrates’ Court closed on 31st May 2019, following their consultation launched on 14th March 2019, with the outcome published on 28th June 2019. HMCTS have confirmed, via the above consultation, that all general Crime work will move to York Magistrates’ Court and all road traffic will move to Harrogate Magistrates’ Court, effective from 1st October 2019. There will be no separate listing of Northallerton and York cases at York Magistrates’ Court. We have tried to keep changes to Duty Solicitor Schemes to a minimum whilst taking into account the likely impact on levels of service to clients from solicitors whose offices will no longer be local to the Court dealing with their matter. This Consultation This consultation paper comprises two sections: Section 1 outlines the Duty Solicitor Schemes affected and rationale behind the decision to consult. Section 2 outlines the options identified to change the Duty Solicitor Schemes affected within your local geographic area. We are consulting on these proposals for 4 weeks, from Friday 19th July to Friday 16th August 2019. Responses should be sent by email to [email protected] with the heading marked Northallerton & Richmond Duty Solicitor Scheme Consultation Response. Section 1 –Duty Solicitor Schemes affected and rationale. Following the closure of Northallerton Magistrates’ Court on 31st May 2019, it has been necessary to consult to determine the long-term arrangements for the Northallerton Duty Scheme work.
    [Show full text]
  • 492 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    492 bus time schedule & line map 492 Tadcaster - Sherburn View In Website Mode The 492 bus line (Tadcaster - Sherburn) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Sherburn In Elmet <-> Tadcaster: 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM (2) Tadcaster <-> Sherburn In Elmet: 10:25 AM - 5:35 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 492 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 492 bus arriving. Direction: Sherburn In Elmet <-> Tadcaster 492 bus Time Schedule 18 stops Sherburn In Elmet <-> Tadcaster Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Sherburn Crossroads, Sherburn In Elmet 9 Low Street, Sherburn in Elmet Tuesday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Petrol Station, Sherburn In Elmet Wednesday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Victoria Court, Sherburn in Elmet Thursday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Pasture Way, Sherburn In Elmet Friday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Moor Lane, Sherburn in Elmet Saturday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Oak Terrace, Sherburn In Elmet A162, Sherburn In Elmet Civil Parish Rainbow Nursery School, Barkston Ash 492 bus Info Oldgates Lane, Barkston Ash Direction: Sherburn In Elmet <-> Tadcaster Stops: 18 Headwell Lane, Saxton Trip Duration: 27 min Line Summary: Sherburn Crossroads, Sherburn In Scarthingwell Crescent, Saxton Elmet, Petrol Station, Sherburn In Elmet, Pasture Saxton Court, Saxton With Scarthingwell Civil Parish Way, Sherburn In Elmet, Oak Terrace, Sherburn In Elmet, Rainbow Nursery School, Barkston Ash, Rockingham Court, Towton Oldgates Lane, Barkston Ash, Headwell Lane, Rockingham Court, Towton Civil Parish Saxton, Scarthingwell
    [Show full text]
  • Land at the Old Quarry Monk Fryston Offers Invited
    Land at The Old Quarry Monk Fryston Offers Invited Land/Potential Development Site – Public Notice – We act on behalf of the Parish Council / vendors in the sale of this approximately 2/3 acre site within the development area of Monk Fryston. Any interested parties are invited to submit best and final offers (conditional or unconditional) in writing (in a sealed envelope marked ‘Quarry Land, Monk Fryston’ & your name) to the selling agents before the 1st June 2014. Stephensons Estate Agents, 43 Gowthorpe, Selby, YO8 4HE, telephone 01757 706707. • Potential Development Site • Subject to Planning Permission • Approximately 2/3 Acre • Sought After Village Selby 01757 706707 www.stephensons4property.co.uk Estate Agents Chartered Surveyors Auctioneers Land at The Old Quarry, Monk Fryston Potential development site (subject to planning permission). The site extends to approximately 2/3 acre and forms part of a former quarry, located in this much sought after village of Monk Fryston. With shared access off the Main Street/Leeds Road. The successful developer/purchaser may wish to consider the possibility of a further access off Lumby Lane/Abbeystone Way, which may be available via a third party (contact details can be provided by the selling agent). The site is conveniently located for easy vehicular access to the A1/M62 motorway network and commuting to many nearby regional centres such as York, Leeds, Doncaster and Hull etc. TO VIEW LOCAL AUTHORITY By appointment with the agents Selby office. Selby District Council Civic Centre LOCATION Portholme Road Located on the edge of this much sought after village of Monk Selby Fryston and being conveniently located for access to the A1/M62 YO8 4SB motorway network and commuting to many regional centres like Telephone 01757 705101 Leeds, Wakefield, Doncaster, Tadcaster, York and Selby etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Monk Fryston VILLAGE DESIGN STATEMENT
    Monk Fryston VILLAGE DESIGN STATEMENT SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT CONSULTATION DRAFT August 2011 Contents Purpose of a Village Design Statement The Monk Fryston Village Design Statement Introduction and History Important Buildings Character Area One Architecture Character Area Two Late 20 th Century estates Appendices Inventory of important buildings What is a Village Design Statement and how do I use it? General advice for prospective developers VDS Objectives • To Provide a record of local distinctiveness by describing the unique qualities and character of the village. • To identify the key features and characteristics of the local natural and built environment to be respected and protected from the impact of inappropriate development. • To provide design guidance for new development so that change is managed and development is in harmony with its setting. • To achieve a higher standard of sustainable design and where possible to enhance the local environment. • To increase the involvement and influence of the local community in the planning system. Location map Not to scale Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey with the permission of the controller of Her Majesty’s Stat ionary Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or Purpose of a Village Design Statement 1.0 Our villages all occupy a unique position in the surrounding countryside, and have evolved over hundreds of years to suit the needs and circumstances of the people who lived there through the ages. As a result of this, we are naturally drawn to the elements that make our own village different for others, and those things that make it unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire GREEN Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study
    Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Yorkshire GREEN Project Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study (YG-NSC-00001) National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA Final - March 2021 Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Page intentionally blank Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Document Control Document Properties Organisation AECOM Ltd Author Alison Williams Approved by Michael Williams Title Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Document Reference YG-NSC-00001 Version History Date Version Status Description/Changes 02 March 2021 V8 Final version Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Page intentionally blank Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Overview and Purpose 1 1.2 Background and Need 3 1.3 Description of the Project 3 1.4 Structure of this Report 7 1.5 The Project Team 7 2. APPROACH TO ROUTEING AND SITING 8 2.1 Overview of National Grid’s Approach 8 2.2 Route and Site Selection Process 11 2.3 Overview of Stages of Development 11 3. THE STUDY AREA 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 York North Study Area 16 3.3 Tadcaster Study Area 17 3.4 Monk Fryston Study Area 17 4. YORK NORTH OPTIONS APPRAISAL 19 4.1 Approach to Appraisal 19 4.2 CSEC Siting Area Identification 19 4.3 Substation Siting Area Identification 19 4.4 Overhead Line Routeing Identification 20 4.5 Combination Options 20 4.6 Screening of York North Options 24 4.7 Options Appraisal Summary of Remaining York North Options 28 4.8 The Holford Rules and Horlock Rules 76 4.9 York North Preferred Option 76 5.
    [Show full text]
  • North Yorkshire Housing Allocation Policy
    Meeting: SCRUTINY COMMITTEE Date: 22 NOVEMBER 2011 Time: 5.00PM Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM To: Councillors I Chilvers, M Dyson, K Ellis, M Hobson, D Mackay, Mrs W Nichols (Chair), C Pearson, D Peart, R Price (Vice Chair) Agenda 1. Apologies for absence 2. Disclosures of Interest Members of the Scrutiny Committee should disclose personal or prejudicial interest(s) in any item on this agenda. 3. Minutes To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the Scrutiny Committee held on 25 October 2011 (pages 3 to 11 attached). 4. Call In Items 5. Chair’s Address to the Scrutiny Committee 6. Crime and Disorder – Safer Neighbourhood Team Priorities North Yorkshire Police Report submitted for information only (page 12 to 13 attached). 7. North Yorkshire Home Choice – Allocations Choice Based Lettings Policy Report of the Policy Officer (page 14 to 57 attached). Julia Jennison and Vanessa Crane in attendance. 8. 2nd Quarter Corporate Plan Report Report of the Business Manager (page 58 to 72 attached). Eve Williams in attendance. Scrutiny Committee 22 November 2011 1 9. Access Selby Service Provision – Leisure Provision (WLCT) Report of the Senior Contracts Officer (pages 73 to 75 attached). Mike Lyons, WLCT - Head of Service (Sport and Leisure) and Aimi Brookes in attendance. 10. Access Selby Service Provision – Customer Contact Centre Report of the Lead Officer – Community Support Teams (pages 76 to 78 attached). Simon Parkinson in attendance. 11. Scrutiny Committee Work Programme The Committee are presented with the
    [Show full text]
  • Fleet List - January 2018
    FOI 1117.2017-18 Fleet List - January 2018 Reg Make Model Operator Based YJ65DFD BMW 330 PP, RPG RICHMOND YJ15HCA BMW 330 PP, RPG RICHMOND YJ65DFC BMW 330 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXW BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG HARROGATE BHR YJ64AYG BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG HARROGATE BHR YJ65DFP BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG MALTON YJ15HDD BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG MALTON YJ64AYF BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG MALTON NX14AWU BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG MALTON YJ16HGG BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG SKIPTON YJ15HCG BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG SKIPTON NX14AYB BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG TADCASTER YJ64AXN BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG THIRSK VALE HOUSE YJ15HCY BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG THIRSK VALE HOUSE YJ64AYM BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG THIRSK VALE HOUSE YJ15HDC BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG, RCT TADCASTER YJ12BFM BMW 530 PP, RPG MALTON YJ59OHW BMW 530 Training Department THIRSK VALE HOUSE NX14AXK BMW R1200 PP, RPG RICHMOND YJ16HFZ BMW R1200 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXM BMW R1200 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXF BMW R1200 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXG BMW R1200 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXH BMW R1200 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXJ BMW R1200 PP, RPG THIRSK VALE HOUSE YJ66BSO BMW RT1200 Training Department THIRSK VALE HOUSE YJ15HDE BMW X5 PP, RPG HARROGATE BHR YJ65DDL BMW X5 PP, RPG HARROGATE BHR YJ64AYU BMW X5 PP, RPG MALTON NX14AXV BMW X5 PP, RPG RICHMOND YJ15HCP BMW X5 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AYA BMW X5 PP, RPG TADCASTER YJ64AYB BMW X5 PP, RPG THIRSK VALE HOUSE NX14AYC BMW X5 Training Department THIRSK VALE HOUSE KW66YEY DUCATI Multisrada 1200 M/Cy PP, RPG, Bikesafe TADCASTER YK10AUM FORD CONNECT York MILL HOUSE (NTH STR) LV59YTN FORD
    [Show full text]
  • North Yorkshire County Council Selby and Ainsty Area Constituency Committee – 11 June 2021 Update on Selby District Places and Movement Study
    North Yorkshire County Council Selby and Ainsty Area Constituency Committee – 11 June 2021 Update on Selby District Places and Movement Study 1.0 Purpose of the Report 1.1 To provide a progress report on the Selby District Places and Movement Study. 2.0 Update 2.2 The Selby Places and Movement study was commissioned in Summer 2020, jointly by NYCC and Selby District Council (SDC). The aim of the study is to consider how congestion could be reduced, how air quality could be improved and how the highway network might be adapted to support improved movement for all modes. In addition to this, the study also considers the place making agenda in the towns in question. 2.3 The study was commissioned covering the areas of Selby, Sherburn in Elmet and Tadcaster, and was funded by the YNYLEP, the NYCC major scheme development budget and Selby District Council. 2.4 A series of workshops, including elected members, officers and partner organisations have taken place at various stages throughout the process to allow dissemination of information and opportunity to input into options and make suggestions. 2.5 During the optioneering process, working in partnership with planning colleagues, it became apparent that work on the Tadcaster option would clash with Selby district local plan development options, therefore work on that particular element of the study was paused. Work on the Tadcaster elements of the study will resume once the local plan consultation has concluded. The funding that remained for the Tadcaster elements of the study has been diverted to additional modelling of the Selby options.
    [Show full text]
  • North Yorkshire Disability Forum
    North Yorkshire Disability Forum North Yorkshire Disability Forum York CVS, Priory Street, YO1 6ET 11 March 2016 11am – 3.30pm Confirmed minutes Present Andrew Newton (Chair) RipPSI and H/C Disability Forum Shanna Carrell (notes) NYCC Health and Adult Services Nick Jewkes Harrogate Disability Forum Brenda Haw Harrogate Disability Forum Nick Moxon Harrogate Disability Forum Maggie Donnelly RipPSI Bill Chatt Yorkshire Coast Disability Forum Bill Busfield Yorkshire Coast Disability Forum Tracey Pickering Yorkshire Coast Disability Forum Pablo Rees Yorkshire Coast Disability Forum Phil Dodson Selby District Disability Forum Judith Riley Selby District Disability Forum Vanessa Langford Selby District Disability Forum John Atkins Hambleton & Richmondshire DF Sally Anderson NYCC Health and Adult Services Kellie Woodley Inclusion North Julie Fletcher BSL interpreter David Wycherley BSL interpreter Apologies Joe Lennon Selby District Disability Forum Deirdre Edgar Hambleton & Richmondshire DF Nichola Brown Hambleton & Richmondshire DF Roy Emmerson Hambleton & Richmondshire DF Julie Knight NYCIL Page 1 of 10 North Yorkshire Disability Forum 1. Introductions and Welcome Welcome to Nick Moxon, Judith Riley and Vanessa Langford, all of whom are attending the NYDF for the first time. Welcome also to our guests, Sally Anderson and Kellie Woodley. 2. Apologies: as listed on page 1 Declarations of interest: none. 3. Notes of last meeting, 11 December 2015 The minutes were approved as accurate. Matters arising from last meeting: a) Dropped kerbs group: SC to arrange a date for the meeting with Business and Environmental Services. b) SC to circulate contact details for the commissioning team, as suggested by Sue Carty at the meeting in December. c) LGA focus group on 9th March: attended by Maggie, Andrew and Vanessa.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Monitoring Report: Yorkshire
    Housing Monitoring Report: Yorkshire February 2021 Contents 2 Introduction The Northern Planning team constantly monitors the activities of local planning authorities to identify opportunities for clients. This monitoring report has been created to provide a snapshot of the current planning policy position for the local authorities in Yorkshire; alongside identifying local authorities where consultations on emerging planning policies are live or expected imminently. Based on the latest available documents we have also sought to identify the relevant five year housing supply position. The revised NPPF was updated in February 2019 and, alongside changes to the Planning Practice Guidance, reaffirms the Government’s intention to deliver 300,000 new homes per year by the mid-2020s. Local Plans are beginning to catch up with the Government’s objectives, but there is a long way to go. From 24 January 2019, local planning authorities who have not submitted their emerging strategic plans for examination will now have to address the housing delivery targets arising from the Government’s standard methodology. Equally, where strategic plans are more than five years old the standard methodology should be used for the purposes of calculating the five year supply of deliverable housing sites. The map below provides a summary of the current status of strategic plans across the region. The information included in this monitoring report is indicative and the best available at the time of publication. Due to the impact of COVID-19 the suggested timescales
    [Show full text]
  • Selby District Council Agenda
    Selby District Council Agenda Meeting: Executive Date: Thursday 6 October 2016 Time: 1.00pm (Please note the amended start time) Venue: Committee Room To: Councillors M Crane (Chair), J Mackman (Vice Chair), C Lunn, C Metcalfe and R Musgrave. 1. Apologies for absence 2. Minutes The Executive is asked to approve the minutes of the meeting held on 25 August 2016 (pages 1 to 7 attached). 3. Disclosures of Interest A copy of the Register of Interest for each Selby District Councillor is available for inspection at www.selby.gov.uk. Councillors should declare to the meeting any disclosable pecuniary interest in any item of business on this agenda which is not already entered in their Register of Interests. Councillors should leave the meeting and take no part in the consideration, discussion or vote on any matter in which they have a disclosable pecuniary interest. Councillors should also declare any other interests. Having made the declaration, provided the other interest is not a disclosable pecuniary interest, the Councillor may stay in the meeting, speak and vote on that item of business. If in doubt, Councillors are advised to seek advice from the Monitoring Officer. Executive 6 October 2016 4. Corporate Performance Report – Quarter 1 – 2016/17 (April to June) Report E/16/18 presents the quarterly Corporate Performance Report which provides a progress update on delivery of the Council’s Corporate Plan 2015-20 as measured by a combination of: progress against priority projects/high level actions; and performance against Key Performance Indicators (pages 8 to 29 attached). 5. Council Tax Support Scheme 2017/18 Report E/16/19 outlines the results from the public consultation for the Council Tax Support Scheme 2017/18 (pages 30 to 36 attached).
    [Show full text]