Maryland's Trout and Salmon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maryland's Trout and Salmon Maryland's Trout and Salmon Frank J. Schwartz University of Maryland Chesapeake Biological Laboratory Solomons, Maryland Educational Series 76 Maryland Conservationist Vol. XLM, No. 2: 2-6 1967 Maryland's Trout and Salmon A SWIRL of water, a mighty leap, ring salmon is the Atlantic salmon from California about 1883. Brown a flash of red, blue, brown or white (Salmo salar). trout stocking began at the same time. is all that a young lad or a grand- Trout once haunted most of Mary- Several lots of searun Atlantic salmon dad needs to set his mind racing and land's upland streams. But man and were introduced into the Gunpowder, his heart pounding with joy. You might his lumbering, strip mining, agri- Susquehanna and Patuxent Rivers be- ask, "what is so beautiful that it can culture and pollution practices either tween 1873 and 1877, and into the lure men away from the bustle of killed the trout or forced them to re- Youghiogheny River in April of 1880. everyday life and cause feelings rang- treat to those streams in the western None were successful. About 1873, ing from admiration to awe?" The counties where primitive and forest chinook or king salmon ( Oncorhyn- answer can only be the sight of a conditions remained. Meshack Brown- chus tshawytscha) from the West Coast trout or salmon. ing, in his Forty-Four Years of the were unsuccessfully introduced into the Marylanders will brave all sorts of Life of a Hunter, mentioned harvest- Youghiogheny and Potomac Rivers. hardships to glimpse this wily group ing many five pound brook trout from In the 1890's, lake trout (Salvelinus of fishes and pit their skill and pa- these tributaries, especially near Sang namaycush), were introduced in the tience against them. To many, noth- Run in Garrett County. Frederick Youghiogheny River and other Gar- ing is more impressive than the Skinner, commenting in Turf, Field rett County streams, but none suc- majestic, sleek trout lurking near a and Farm, on the western tributaries, ceeded. rock or riffle in a clear stream; nothing particularly the Youghiogheny River, Today, populations of brook, brown, is more crafty in taking a fisherman's noted that it was swarming with five and rainbow trout exist due to a bait; nothing struggles so violently pound, 22 inch brook trout in 1834. "put and take" stocking practice. for life once hooked; and nothing But even here, the trout were unsafe. More than 45 streams are stocked intertwines that freshness of land, As the human population grew, pres- annually so that present generations water and mind to make life so in- sure on wildlife populations soon can still see, catch and enjoy these teresting. caused depletions of natural stocks so fishes. This policy must prevail since Maryland waters are blessed with that as early as the late 19th Century, much of the trout's original spawning one native trout, several introduced it was necessary to stock fish for public and stream habitat is altered or de- species and one salmon. The sole fishing. spoiled. The gravel so necessary for native trout is the brook trout (Sal- Successful stocking of brook trout spawning beds (redds) is silted over. velinus fontinalis), while the intro- in the State's waters began about 1875. Industrial activities have often warmed duced forms are the brown (Salmo Extensive stocking in Deep Creek the water above tolerance levels (55 trutta) and rainbow trout (Salmo Lake started in 1919. Rainbow trout degrees for brook trout, 65 degrees for gairdneri). The only naturally occur- were introduced by shipments of eggs brown or rainbow) . Many streams' 2 MARYLAND CONSERVATIONIST distinguishes the Atlantic salmon, water with temperatures near 51 de- brown trout and rainbow trout, while grees. Hatching occurs between 48 and the brook trout has light spots on a 52 days. Hatchery fish probably grow darker background. faster than wild individuals, often at- In New England and Canada, the taining a length of 17 inches in 16 Atlantic salmon may weigh up to 40 months. pounds. Locally, this dull silvery or Both natural and artificial baits are steel blue fish, with scattered round or used for fishing brown trout. Dry flies X-shaped black spots and large scales are good, especially in the early morn- on its body, seldom exceeds 12 inches ing, late afternoon and evening. Spin- and a few ounces in weight. The ners ahead of a fly or spoon are good ventral and anal fins are white. Else- for early spring or turbid water fish- where, males on spawning runs lose ing, while small flies are preferred bait their silvery sheen, turn a dull brown- in midsummer. Night crawlers, salmon ish and reddish hue, and may exhibit eggs, or cheese balls fished close to the orange, black or red body spots. Their bottom produce results anytime of jaws elongate and become hooked, so day. only the tips touch. They may ascend streams for many miles and spawn in In Maryland, the rainbow trout a shallow redd. After spawning, al- may reach a maximum of 27 inches though spent and often dying, they and 81/4 pounds. They are distinc- feed voraciously and will actively strike tively marked with a lateral longitu- a fly. dinal band of pinkish blue or red. The dorsal, anal and caudal fins and Young, known as parr, possess 10 back have black spots. No pink or to 11 marks along their bodies; these red occurs on the throat area. Young alternate with bright red spots, and possess parr-marks. are set off by an orange adipose fin. water chemistry is changed drastically; Young salmon remain in fresh water The rainbow trout is an active mol- they frequently lack oxygen or are for two years before migrating to the lusc, insect and fish feeder. It spawns highly contaminated with pollutants. sea during the third summer where from late February to early April. Plant cover needed to shade and cool they feed on fish and crustaceans. About 50 days are necessary for hatch- the streams disappeared. In many They grow rapidly and may weigh ing. Hatchery fish reach a length of areas, rivers are dammed, depriving the seven pounds after only one year at six inches in 16 months while three inch trout of the swift clear water they must sea. lengths normally prevail more than a have to grow and reproduce. year under natural conditions. Changes in the Chesapeake Bay re- The brown trout, primarily a stocked duced the population of searun At- fish in Maryland, reaches a maxi- Worms are the best bait, for rain- 1 bows, although salmon eggs, minnows, lantic salmon that once ascended its mum of about 27 inches and 8/2 tributaries to spawn. Populations that pounds. It is golden brown with dark grasshoppers and other insects will produce action. Pools and riffles are yielded many pounds of catchable fish brown or black spots on the body, at the turn of the century, today com- dorsal, adipose and caudal fins. The favorite hiding spots for these fishes. prise only an occasional straggler. body and adipose fin spots are some- Wet fly fishermen usually fish down times orange or red, or edged with and across a stream while dry fly Although trout and salmon may orange dorsally while those ventrally fishermen generally fish for this species look alike, each species has distinc- may be ringed with pink or red. The by casting upstream with a down- tive characteristics. All belong to the large adipose fin of young fish is stream float of the bait and slack bony fish family Salmonidae. This orange. Young brown trout, like the retrieval. family of fishes is characterized by an Atlantic salmon, are parr-marked. elongated body, cycloid (round and The brook trout is olive green with smooth) scales, naked head, large Brown trout are often inactive dur- wormlike markings on its dorsal fin mouth and a fleshy dorsal flap or ing midday and spend much time in and back. Its sides are spotted with adipose fin located behind the dorsal deep pools or near protective cover. many greenish spots, some with red fin. The caudal or tail fin may be They feed actively in the early morn- and blue borders. Ventrally, an orange strongly or slightly forked. The ventral ing and evening, consuming large or orange-black prevails from the gills fins are positioned near the soft-rayed numbers of insects, worms, small cray- to the caudal fin. The pectoral, pelvic anal fin. Internally, many finger-like fishes and fishes. In nature, brown and anal fins have a leading edge of sacs (pyloric caeca) open off and trout reproduce from October through white followed by black, while the occur near the stomach. These aid in December by depositing their eggs in remainder of the fin is orange. The digestion. A basic color pattern of shallow saucer-like nests that are ventral leading edge of the caudal fin dark spots on a lighter background scoured out in sand or gravel beds in is white. APRIL ATLANTIC SALMON Although this fish apparently has never been plentiful in this area. they are still found infrequently. Breeding male and parr-marked young are shown for each species. BROWN TROUT This native European has been stocked here for about 80 years. Reaching a length of 27 inches and weigh- ing up to eight and one half pounds, brown trout can pro- vide you with true adven- ture preferably during early morning or early evening hours. 4 MARYLAND CONSERVATIONIST RAINBOW TROUT Brought to Maryland from the West Coast, rainbow attain a size similar to that of brown trout, although there is little other resemblance.
Recommended publications
  • News Release Address: Email and Homepage: U.S
    News Release Address: Email and Homepage: U.S. Department of the Interior Maryland-Delaware-D.C. District [email protected] U.S. Geological Survey 8987 Yellow Brick Road http://md.water.usgs.gov/ Baltimore, MD 21237 Release: Contact: Phone: Fax: January 4, 2002 Wendy S. McPherson (410) 238-4255 (410) 238-4210 Below Normal Rainfall and Warm Temperatures Lead to Record Low Water Levels in December Three months of above normal temperatures and four months of below normal rainfall have led to record low monthly streamflow and ground-water levels, according to hydrologists at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in Baltimore, Maryland. Streamflow was below normal at 94 percent of the real-time USGS gaging stations and 83 percent of the USGS observation wells across Maryland and Delaware in December. Record low streamflow levels for December were set at Winters Run and Pocomoke River. Streamflow levels at Deer Creek and Winters Run in Harford County have frequently set new record daily lows for the last four months (see real-time graphs at http://md.water.usgs.gov/realtime/). Streamflow was also significantly below normal at Antietam Creek, Choptank River, Conococheague Creek, Nassawango Creek, Patapsco River, Gunpowder River, Patuxent River, Piscataway Creek, Monocacy River, and Potomac River in Maryland, and Christina River, St. Jones River, and White Clay Creek in Delaware. The monthly streamflow in the Potomac River near Washington, D.C. was 82 percent below normal in December and 54 percent below normal for 2001. Streamflow entering the Chesapeake Bay averaged 23.7 bgd (billion gallons per day), which is 54 percent below the long-term average for December.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Some Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Skip Spawning?
    SCRS/2006/088 Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 60(4): 1141-1153 (2007) DO SOME ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA SKIP SPAWNING? David H. Secor1 SUMMARY During the spawning season for Atlantic bluefin tuna, some adults occur outside known spawning centers, suggesting either unknown spawning regions, or fundamental errors in our current understanding of bluefin tuna reproductive schedules. Based upon recent scientific perspectives, skipped spawning (delayed maturation and non-annual spawning) is possibly prevalent in moderately long-lived marine species like bluefin tuna. In principle, skipped spawning represents a trade-off between current and future reproduction. By foregoing reproduction, an individual can incur survival and growth benefits that accrue in deferred reproduction. Across a range of species, skipped reproduction was positively correlated with longevity, but for non-sturgeon species, adults spawned at intervals at least once every two years. A range of types of skipped spawning (constant, younger, older, event skipping; and delays in first maturation) was modeled for the western Atlantic bluefin tuna population to test for their effects on the egg-production-per-recruit biological reference point (stipulated at 20% and 40%). With the exception of extreme delays in maturation, skipped spawning had relatively small effect in depressing fishing mortality (F) threshold values. This was particularly true in comparison to scenarios of a juvenile fishery (ages 4-7), which substantially depressed threshold F values. Indeed, recent F estimates for 1990-2002 western Atlantic bluefin tuna stock assessments were in excess of threshold F values when juvenile size classes were exploited. If western bluefin tuna are currently maturing at an older age than is currently assessed (i.e., 10 v.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Trout
    Aboriginal Aquaculture Association • FinfishFinfish Facts Facts Rainbow Trout Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss - Latin name) The rainbow trout is a species of salmonid native to tributaries of the Pacific Ocean in Asia and North America. The steelhead is a sea-run rainbow trout (anadromous) usually returning to freshwater to spawn after two to three years at sea; rainbow trout and steelhead trout are the same species. The fsh are often called salmon trout. Several other fish in the salmonid family are called trout; some are anadromous like salmon, whereas others are resident in freshwater only. The species has been introduced for food or sport to many countries, and every continent except Antarctica. The first rainbow trout hatchery was established on San Leandro Creek, a tributary of San Francisco Bay, in 1870, with trout production beginning in 1871. Today, they are farmed in many countries throughout the world. Since the 1950s, commercial production has grown exponentially, particularly in Europe and recently in Chile. In Chile and Norway, ocean cage production of steelheads has expanded to supply export markets. Inland production of rainbow trout to supply domestic markets has increased in countries such as Italy, France, Germany, Denmark and Spain. Other significant producing countries include the USA, Iran, Germany and the United Kingdom. Rainbow Trout Farming in BC Rainbow trout fillets Nutrition Facts for Rainbow Trout: per 3.5 oz (100 g) cooked weight Energy 131 calories Protein 18.4 g Total fat 5.8 g Trout Production • 2010 Saturated fat .09 g Cholesterol 56.0 mg Total carbohydrates 0 g Sodium 39.0 mg Omega-3 1.1 g Source: Seafood Business Rainbow Trout Life Cycle: Alevins Rainbow Trout begin their lives at a domestic Brood Stock facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Sport-Fish-Identification.Pdf
    Walleye Walleye have two distinct fins on their back, the first with large spines. Lake Sturgeon They have a yellow-olive back, brassy, silvery sides with yellow spots, a white underside, and white on the lower lobe of the tail. Dusky vertical Lake Sturgeon are a Threatened Species due to population size and bars are often found on the body as well. concerns with viability. Lake Sturgeon have a large brown or grey body covered with tough, leather- like tissue and five rows of bony plates. They have a shark-like, upturned tail and a pointed snout with four barbels. Sauger Lake Whitefish are olive-green to blue on the back, with silvery sides.They Sauger are a Threatened Species due to hybridization, habitat Lakehave a small Whitefish mouth below a rounded snout, and a deeply forked tail. degradation and overharvest. Sauger are golden olive on the back with silver-yellow sides and a white underside. They also have a large spiny dorsal fin, distinct rows of spots on the dorsal fins and three or four dusky vertical bars on the body. Mountain Whitefish have large scales, no spots and small mouths with no Burbot Mountainteeth. Their general Whitefish body colour is a bronze-white or greenish white. Burbot have a slim, brownish black body with smooth skin, a flattened head, and a fin that stretches along the back half of the body. Distinctive barbels hang from the lower jaw and nostrils. Goldeye Northern Pike Goldeye have prominent eyes with bright yellow pupils, a blunt head, and Northern Pike are a long, slender fish with duck-like jaws and a long, flat a deep, compressed body.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunpowder River
    Table of Contents 1. Polluted Runoff in Baltimore County 2. Map of Baltimore County – Percentage of Hard Surfaces 3. Baltimore County 2014 Polluted Runoff Projects 4. Fact Sheet – Baltimore County has a Problem 5. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Back River 6. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Gunpowder River 7. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Middle River 8. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Patapsco River 9. FAQs – Polluted Runoff and Fees POLLUTED RUNOFF IN BALTIMORE COUNTY Baltimore County contains the headwaters for many of the streams and tributaries feeding into the Patapsco River, one of the major rivers of the Chesapeake Bay. These tributaries include Bodkin Creek, Jones Falls, Gwynns Falls, Patapsco River Lower North Branch, Liberty Reservoir and South Branch Patapsco. Baltimore County is also home to the Gunpowder River, Middle River, and the Back River. Unfortunately, all of these streams and rivers are polluted by nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment and are considered “impaired” by the Maryland Department of the Environment, meaning the water quality is too low to support the water’s intended use. One major contributor to that pollution and impairment is polluted runoff. Polluted runoff contaminates our local rivers and streams and threatens local drinking water. Water running off of roofs, driveways, lawns and parking lots picks up trash, motor oil, grease, excess lawn fertilizers, pesticides, dog waste and other pollutants and washes them into the streams and rivers flowing through our communities. This pollution causes a multitude of problems, including toxic algae blooms, harmful bacteria, extensive dead zones, reduced dissolved oxygen, and unsightly trash clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Coexistence of Fish Species with Coastal Cutthroat Trout in Low Order Streams of Western Oregon and Washington, USA
    fishes Article Evaluating Coexistence of Fish Species with Coastal Cutthroat Trout in Low Order Streams of Western Oregon and Washington, USA Kyle D. Martens 1,* and Jason Dunham 2 1 Washington Department of Natural Resources, 1111 Washington Street SE, Olympia, WA 98504, USA 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: When multiple species of fish coexist there are a host of potential ways through which they may interact, yet there is often a strong focus on studies of single species without considering these interactions. For example, many studies of forestry–stream interactions in the Pacific Northwest have focused solely on the most prevalent species: Coastal cutthroat trout. To examine the potential for interactions of other fishes with coastal cutthroat trout, we conducted an analysis of 281 sites in low order streams located on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula and along the central Oregon coast. Coastal cutthroat trout and juvenile coho salmon were the most commonly found salmonid species within these streams and exhibited positive associations with each other for both presence and density. Steelhead were negatively associated with the presence of coastal cutthroat trout as well as with coho salmon and sculpins (Cottidae). Coastal cutthroat trout most frequently shared streams with juvenile coho salmon. For densities of these co-occurring species, associations between these two species were relatively weak compared to the strong influences of physical stream conditions Citation: Martens, K.D.; Dunham, J. (size and gradient), suggesting that physical conditions may have more of an influence on density Evaluating Coexistence of Fish Species with Coastal Cutthroat Trout than species interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Study on the Stomach Content of Southern Bluefin Tuna Thunnus Maccoyii Caught by Taiwanese Longliner in the Central Indian Ocean
    CCSBT-ESC/0509/35 A preliminary study on the stomach content of southern bluefin tuna Thunnus maccoyii caught by Taiwanese longliner in the central Indian Ocean Kwang-Ming Liu1, Wei-Ke Chen2, Shoou-Jeng Joung2, and Sui-Kai Chang3 1. Institute of Marine Resource Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan. 2. Department of Environmental Biology and Fisheries Science, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan. 3. Fisheries Agency, Council of Agriculture, Taipei, Taiwan. Abstract The stomach contents of 63 southern bluefin tuna captured by Taiwanese longliners in central Indian Ocean in August 2004 were examined. The size of tunas ranged from 84-187 cm FL (12-115 kg GG). The length and weight frequency distributions indicated that most specimens were in the range of 100-130 cm FL with a body weight between 10 and 30 kg for both sexes. The sexes- combined relationship between dressed weight and fork length can be described by W = 6.975× 10-6× FL3.1765 (n=56, r2=0.967, p < 0.05). The subjective index of fullness of specimens was estimated as: 1 = empty (38.6%), 2 = <half full (47.37%), 3 = half full (3.51%), 4 = >half full (5.26%), and 5 = full (5.26%). For the stomachs with prey items, almost all the preys are pisces and the proportion of each prey groups are fishes (95.6%), cephalopods (2.05%), and crustaceans (0.02%). In total, 6 prey taxa were identified – 4 species of fish, 1 unidentified pisces, 1 unidentified crustacean, and 1 unidentified squid. The 4 fish species fall in the family of Carangidae, Clupeidae, Emmelichthyidae, and Hemiramphidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland's Wildland Preservation System “The Best of the Best”
    Maryland’s Wildland Preservation System “The“The Best Best ofof thethe Best” Best” What is a Wildland? Natural Resources Article §5‐1201(d): “Wildlands” means limited areas of [State‐owned] land or water which have •Retained their wilderness character, although not necessarily completely natural and undisturbed, or •Have rare or vanishing species of plant or animal life, or • Similar features of interest worthy of preservation for use of present and future residents of the State. •This may include unique ecological, geological, scenic, and contemplative recreational areas on State lands. Why Protect Wildlands? •They are Maryland’s “Last Great Places” •They represent much of the richness & diversity of Maryland’s Natural Heritage •Once lost, they can not be replaced •In using and conserving our State’s natural resources, the one characteristic more essential than any other is foresight What is Permitted? • Activities which are consistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area, such as hiking, canoeing, kayaking, rafting, hunting, fishing, & trapping • Activities necessary to protect the area from fire, animals, insects, disease, & erosion (evaluated on a case‐by case basis) What is Prohibited? Activities which are inconsistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area: permanent roads structures installations commercial enterprises introduction of non‐native wildlife mineral extraction Candidate Wildlands •23 areas •21,890 acres •9 new •13,128 acres •14 expansions Map can be found online at: http://dnr.maryland.gov/land/stewardship/pdfs/wildland_map.pdf
    [Show full text]
  • This Special Bulletin Brings to You the Summary and Recommendations of the Whitman, Requardt and Associates Report on Lake Rolan
    SPECIAL REPORT FROM Associates, Engineers, to do an engineering study on how THE LAKE ROLAND WATERSHED FOUNDATION, INC. best to remove silt now clogging the Lake, and collecting daily at a rapid rate. This study was authorized by Baltimore This special Bulletin brings to you the Summary and City and Baltimore County. Recommendations of the Whitman, Requardt and Associates (2) The offer of free dredging services for two months by report on Lake Roland, published in July, 1974. We are Ellicott Machine Corporation, and reduced labor-operating grateful to Mr. Douglas L. Tawney, Director, Baltimore City costs by C. J. Langenfelder & Company and the Operating Bureau of Recreation and Parks, for permission to do this. Engineers Union. We alsoprovide you with a map showing where the planned (3) Theformation of a tax-exempt, non-profit community basins will be and the location of the spoil areas. organization, under the auspices of the Ruxton-Riderwood We ask you to read this carefully so that you will know the Improvement Association, known as The Lake Roland facts when the community meeting is held Monday evening, Watershed Foundation, Inc. The Foundation will act as a September 30, in the Auditorium of the Church of the Good voice for the community, and will work to insure that any Shepherd, Boyce Avenue, Ruxton, at 8P.M. At this time, Mr. conservation program for Lake Roland is carefully and John B. Gillett of Whitman, Requardt and Associates, will sensitively executed. present the project and will try to answer any questions you (4) Expression of interest in the designation of Lake may have.
    [Show full text]
  • Upstream, Downstream from Good Intentions to Cleaner Waters
    Upstream, Downstream From Good Intentions to Cleaner Waters A Ground-Breaking Study of Public Attitudes Toward Stormwater in the Baltimore Area Sponsored by the Herring Run Watershed Association and the Jones Falls Watershed Association OpinionWorks / 2008 OpinionWorks Stormwater Action Coalition The Stormwater Action Coalition is a subgroup of the Watershed Advisory Group (WAG). WAG is an informal coalition of about 20 organizations from the Baltimore Metropolitan area who come together from time to time to interact with local government on water quality issues. WAG members represent all the region’s streams and waters and recently pressed the city and county to include stormwater as one of the five topics in the 2006 Baltimore City/Baltimore County Watershed Agreement. The Stormwater Action Coalition is focused on raising public awareness about the problems caused by contaminated urban runoff. Representa- tives of the following organizations have participated in Stormwater Action Coalition activities: Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Baltimore Harbor Watershed Association Center for Watershed Protection Chesapeake Bay Foundation Clean Water Action Environment Maryland Friends of the Patapsco Valley Gunpowder Valley Conservancy Gwynns Falls Watershed Association Herring Run Watershed Association Jones Falls Watershed Association Parks & People Foundation Patapsco/Back River Tributary Team Prettyboy Watershed Alliance Watershed 263 We extend our appreciation to our local government colleagues: Baltimore City Department of Public Works Baltimore City Department of Planning Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management Baltimore Metropolitan Council And to our funders: The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment The Rauch Foundation The Abell Foundation The Baltimore Community Foundation The Cooper Family Fund and the Cromwell Family Fund at the Baltimore Community Foundation More than half of the study participants strongly agree that they would do more, if they just knew what to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Patuxent River Watershed Functional Plan
    TI11E Functional \laster Plan for the Patuxent Ril'er Watershed in \lontgome1y Count) AUTHOR The \lai-·land-\ational Capital Park and Planning Commi:sion Functional \laster Plan for tl1e Patuxent Ril'er \\'atershed in \lontgomei- Count)· DATE \01·ember 1993 PUNNING AGENCY The \Ian land-\ational Capital Park and Planning Cammi ion s~s~ Georgia Al'enue Sill'er Spring. \\D 20910-3~60 SOURCE OF COPIES The \lai-land-\ational Capital Park and Planning Commission s~s~Georgia Al'enue Siller Spring.\!D 20910-3"6o ABSTRACT This document contains the text. 11ith supporting graphics. for the Functional \laster Plan for tl1e Patuxent Rim\\ atershed in \lontgomm Count\. This plan amends the General Plan for the ,\lan·land-\X'ashington Regional District and the \laster Plan for Highwa1, for the \lard and-\\ ashington Regional District. and the following area master plans: Damascus. Olnel'. Sandi Spring-Ashton Special Stud, Area. Eastern \lontgomei-· Count\·. as well as the Functional \laster Plan for Presefl'ation of Agriculture and Rural Open Space. and the Patuxent Ril'er \\ atershed Park .\laster Plan. COPYRIGHT The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 1993 PUBLISHED BY The Montgomery County Planning Department of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20910.3760 APPROVED BY The Montgomery County Council October 1993 ADOPTED BY The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission November 1993 THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION is a bi-county agency created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927. The Commission's geographic authority extends to the great majority of Montgomery and Prince George's Counties; the Maryland-Washington Regional District (M-NCPPC planningjurisdiction) comprises 1,001 square miles, while the Metropolitan District (parks) comprises 919 square miles, in the two counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report
    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
    [Show full text]