Jewish Philosophy: Rebirth Or in Crisis?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Raphael Jospe, Dov Shwartz, eds.. Jewish Philosophy: Perspectives and Retrospectives. Emunot: Jewish Philosophy and Kabbalah Series. Brighton: Academic Studies Press, 2012. 330 pp. $105.00, cloth, ISBN 978-1-61811-160-9. Reviewed by David B. Levy Published on H-Judaic (December, 2013) Commissioned by Jason Kalman (Hebrew Union College - Jewish Institute of Religion) Are we experiencing a renaissance of Jewish general terms liberalism. A stated purpose of this philosophy or must Jewish philosophers be put on part involves asking these academics to “reflect the endangered species list? This is a question on the meaning of their own work, as well as on that the contributors to this edited collection ad‐ how their work relates to contemporary Ameri‐ dress. This book, edited by Raphael Jospe and Dov can philosophical and moral concerns. The essays Schwartz, is a welcome, insightful, intelligent, and address what these writers view as what counts well-written collection of essays that makes a con‐ as Jewish philosophy and what they think the tribution to the state of the feld of Jewish philoso‐ most important issues and most fruitful ways of phy in the university setting as practiced in reli‐ pursuing them are, and how their projects relate gious and Jewish studies departments. In a broad‐ to broad civic or public concerns” (p. 16). In the er context, it joins a growing number of recent introduction to part 1, Alan Mittelman gives a books on Jewish philosophy very different in or‐ good summary of these eight contributions by: ganization, content, method, and approach.[1]. Leora Batnitzky, William Galston, Lenn Goodman, The scope of the book is divided into two parts Steven Kepnes, Michael Morgan, David Novak, based on the fndings of two symposia entitled Norbert M. Samuelson, and Martin Yaffe. Part 1 “The Renaissance of Jewish Philosophy in Ameri‐ wraps up with where it began; Paul Mendes-Flohr ca” and “Maimonides on the Eternity of the asks if we are in the midst of a rebirth of Jewish World,” as well as other studies in medieval Jew‐ philosophy or if his earlier warning, that current ish philosophy and modern Jewish thought. American culture disregards Jewish philosophies, Part 1 consists of eight essays by American risks proving Jewish philosophy irrelevant for the Jewish professors of Jewish philosophy who take life of the nation?[2] seriously the American traditions of pragmatism, Part 2 focuses on Maimonides’s position on analytic philosophy, philosophy of science, and in creationism, the subject of a previous book by H-Net Reviews Kenneth Seeskin (Maimonides on the Origin of the understand the evolution of Rambam’s position World [2005]). This is also the focus of such schol‐ on creation in works written after the Guide, in‐ ars as Alfred Ivry, Herbert Davidson, Joel Krae‐ cluding the Treatise on Resurrection, The Letter mer, and Klein-Braslavy. This section responds to on Astrology to the Sages of Montpellier, The Let‐ Howard Kreisel’s contribution "Maimonides on ter to R. Hisda HaLevy, Medical Aphorisms, and the Eternity of the World", which assumes Mai‐ “the revised version” of the fourth of the thirteen monides’s esotericism, i.e, that the Rambam con‐ formulations of the law in the Commentary on the tradicts himself intentionally to keep from the Mishnah. Manekin notes that “nothing in the writ‐ many controversial Aristotelian positions for ings of his translator Samuel ibn Tibbon, includ‐ which he may have been persecuted. Thus as Ken‐ ing the newly edited notes to the Guide, suggests neth Hart Green writes, the Rambam surrounded that ibn Tibbon considered Rambam’s adherence himself in a “body-guard of lies” in order to write to creationism to be disingenuous” (p. 217). esoterically in the vein of Leo Strauss’s thesis of Manekin solves the conundrum of Maimonides’s Persecution and the Art of Writing (1952).[3] position on creation by noting the frst denial of What was the purpose of Rambam’s Ecclesiastes- this position in the medieval writings of Jewish like internal contradictions? In the course of in‐ Averroists, including Joseph ibn Kaspi, Moses of quiring about Maimonides’s true position on cre‐ Narbonne, and Isaac Albalag. Manekin traces how ationism, the philosophers who respond to this denial of creationism ascribed to Mai‐ Kreisel’s paper consider if the Rambam was more monides’s writings is fallacious, thereby rejecting of a Platonist than an Aristotelian, a theme also in a Straussian esoteric reading of the Guide. While Al-Farabi’s The Attainment of Happiness.[4] These admitting that Strauss considers the Guide a contributions give a greater depth of understand‐ deeply esoteric work that conceals its religiously ing of controversial positions regarding the Ram‐ complex and problematic Aristotelian ideas from bam’s esoteric vs. exoteric teachings. While the many, he shows that with regard to creation‐ Strauss had argued that the Guide for the Per‐ ism, “Strauss exoterically was no Straussian” (p. plexed was Rambam’s esoteric work, Isidore 219). Twersky argued that the Mishneh Torah was Manekin’s essay is preceded by an excellent Rambam’s esoteric work. Part 2 of this volume re‐ essay by Roslyn Weiss, “Comments on Seeskin and casts the esoteric/exoteric dynamic with specific Kreisel’s Essays on Maimonides and Creation,” reference to an understanding of creation. which illustrates the complexity of Maimonides’s Charles Manekin’s outstanding essay demon‐ position and lays out the structure or anatomy of strates Rambam’s commitment to the traditional the Guide’s apparently contradictory examination Jewish understanding of creatio ex nihilo proven of creation in the context of debates about Mai‐ by overwhelming textual evidence from Ram‐ monides’s views on miracles, prophecy, provi‐ bam’s later writings, that the world was created dence, free will, resurrection, and angelology “after absolute nonexistence,” “out of nonexis‐ (Guide 3.43, 570). Weiss concedes that the secrets tence,” or “not from a thing.” That is to say, Mai‐ Maimonides may have been exceedingly careful monides departed from Aristotle in the Eight to keep hidden are those that most threaten the Chapters and Hilchot Deot not only with regard to piety of all but a few. Maimonides was cautious not adhering to the mean by striving to never get about the potential of his understanding of eterni‐ angry and showing that one should be exceeding‐ ty to erode the piety of ordinary people, untrained ly humble as Moses was very humble, but also in philosophical method. Weiss shows how Mai‐ with regard to ultimately rejecting Aristotle’s view monides deployed arguments about eternity to on creation. Manekin demonstrates that one must confirm his case for divine existence, unity, and 2 H-Net Reviews incorporeality, and shows that creation enabled philosophers, because we are but “dwarfs stand‐ Maimonides to embrace revelation, command‐ ing on the shoulders of giants.”[5 ]Yes, Jewish phi‐ ments, and miracles. Weiss concludes her essay in losophy has evolved since the time of Harry A. noting, “It is truth, after all, that pleases God; Wolfson, Julius Guttman, and Strauss.[6] Wolfson falsehood only angers Him” (Guide, 2.47, 409, cit‐ was the frst professor of Jewish philosophy at ed by Weiss on p. 214), alluding to the biblical Harvard University at a time before the founding verses that there is only truth before the throne of of the State of Israel in 1948 and when the centers God and God is near to all who call upon Him in of Wissenschaft des Judentums were in central truth. Part 2 also contains essays by Haggai Europe. In the last decade of Wolfson’s life, there Mazuz, Ottfried Fraisse, Dov Schwartz, James was a rapid expansion of Jewish studies programs Robinson, and Yossef Schwartz. in keeping with the rise of trends in the 1960s of Mittelman, following Mendes-Flohr, writes ethnic studies. New library resources, including that “philosophy serves to secure Israel from idol‐ databases, social media, and digitization post-mi‐ atry and a tribalization of God and Torah. Woe crofilm, have since the time of Wolfson revolu‐ unto the generation, then, for which philosophy tionized scholars’ access to and analysis of prima‐ has become marginalized” (p. 10). There has been ry sources.[7] It is thus perhaps especially ger‐ a decline in philosophy because of the annihila‐ mane to reflect on the state of Jewish philosophy tion of German Jewry, for whom philosophy was in the university at this juncture in history. A lot an essential component of intellectual life and has changed and some things have remained the culture. There is also an unstated factor why phi‐ same but only time will tell if we are to witness a losophy may appear to be in decline and that is do new renaissance in Jewish philosophy, following to with the confusion of what philosophy is, forc‐ in the Solomonic tradition of lovers of wisdom. ing metaphysics to “go underground,” as noted by In general, this book is a welcome addition Strauss (in the footsteps of Al-Farabi). and makes a positive contribution to the state of Strauss argued that there are very few the feld of Jewish philosophy in the university philosophers in each generation. Why are true setting as practiced in religious studies and Jewish philosophers so rare? According to Rambam, studies departments. Although I do not consider Adam in Paradise contemplated the attributes of the book a “renaissance of Jewish philosophy” ac‐ God, i.e., he philosophized. Straussians under‐ cording to Straussian criteria, the book has many stand that real thinking is so extraordinarily awe‐ strengths, such as part 2 which contains two ex‐ some, sublime, magnificent, and transcendent, cellent essays by Manekin and Weiss. The audi‐ that it returns one to an ontological Edenic begin‐ ences of this book will be scholars and educated ning of truth.