Development of a Full-Length Infectious Clone of Grapevine Rupestris Stem Pitting-Associated Virus Strain Syrah and GFP-Tagged and VIGS Vectors for Vitis Vinifera
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Development of a Full-Length Infectious Clone of Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus strain Syrah and GFP-Tagged and VIGS Vectors for Vitis vinifera. by Olivia M. A. Roscow A thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Molecular and Cellular Biology Guelph, Ontario, Canada c Olivia M. A. Roscow, December, 2019 ABSTRACT Development of a Full-Length Infectious Clone of Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus strain Syrah and Production of GFP-Tagged and VIGS Vectors for Vitis vinifera. Olivia Marion Alice Roscow Advisor: University of Guelph, 2019 Dr. Baozhong Meng Advisory Committee: Dr. Annette Nassuth Dr. Ian Tetlow Grapevines are an important Canadian crop, yet quality, health, and yield are threatened by viral infections and coinfections with multiple viruses complicate disease associations. Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV) is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus that is widely distributed worldwide and is associated with Rupestris Stem Pitting, Syrah Decline, and Grapevine Vein Necrosis. Specifically the SY strain is associated with unhealthy vines, possibly being more pathogenic. An infectious clone can help clarify disease associa- tions and viral biology by reproducing singular infections in virus-free plants. MGT, a clone related to SY, was constructed and a GFP-tagged version produced GFP faster and to a greater degree than the asymptomatic GG strain in Nicotiana benthamiana, as determined by Western blotting and epifluorescence microscopy. A Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) clone was also constructed for future study of grapevine genomics. These N. benthamiana experiments provide a foundation for continued work with this clone with grapevines. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to Dr. Baozhong Meng for instilling in me a passion for research and for challenging me to overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles. He has not only nurtured my interest in all things molecular and inspired me to further pursue research, but also taught me great life lessons on how to be stoic and that no challenge is unconquerable. Thanks to Sunny Li for being a great friend and colleague. She provided me with new ideas in times of need and was a great companion in the lab. I hope to always remain in contact. Thanks to everyone who has passed through and is currently working in the Meng lab. Special thanks to Clayton Moore for helping me adjust to Ontario, Huogen Xiao for helping me adjust to the lab, and Mehdi Shabanian for his patience and guidance. Thanks to my advisory committee, Annette Nassuth and Ian Tetlow, for their enthusi- asm and suggestions. They both were tremendously helpful and indispensable in my studies. Thanks to Rosemarie Ganassin, Mark Polinski, Kyler Garver, and Caroline Josefsson for putting me on the right track. Without their help, I would not have progressed this far. Thanks to my immediate family (Greg, Alison, Frazer, and Edward), my partner War- wick, and my close friends for supporting me through the highs and lows of research. No path is linear and they accompanied me through the winding turns. Last, but not least, thanks to NSERC, for their funding and financial support, without which I could not have pursued my passion. Special thanks to the University of Guelph for awarding me the Graduate Excellence Entrance Scholarship and to the Province of Ontario for awarding me the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship in Science & Technology. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................... vii LIST OF TABLES ................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES .................................. x LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................. xi 1 INTRODUCTION ................................ 1 1.1 Grapevines . 1 1.1.1 History . 1 1.1.2 Viruses . 2 1.1.3 Defence & Immunity Against Viruses . 3 1.2 Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus ............ 4 1.2.1 Distribution & Transmission . 5 1.2.2 Taxonomy & Phylogeny . 5 1.2.3 Genome . 6 1.2.4 Replication & Life Cycle . 10 1.2.5 Disease Associations . 12 1.3 Viral Vectors . 13 1.3.1 Wildtype Clones . 15 1.3.2 Protein Expression Vectors . 16 1.3.3 Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) Vectors . 17 1.3.4 GRSPaV-GG Clone . 18 1.4 Justification & Goals . 19 1.5 Hypotheses . 20 1.6 Objectives . 20 2 MATERIALS & METHODS .......................... 20 2.1 Full Length Clone . 20 iv 2.1.1 Previous Work . 22 2.1.2 Viral Source & Cloning Genome Fragments . 22 2.1.3 Subcloning Fragments D and A into the Intermediate Vector . 23 2.1.4 Subcloning the Terminator into the Intermediate Vector . 24 2.1.5 Removing Restriction Sites . 24 2.1.6 Subcloning Fragments B1, B2 & C into the Intermediate Vector 24 2.2 Wildtype Clone . 26 2.3 VIGS Clone . 27 2.3.1 Inserting Restriction Sites into Fragment D . 27 2.3.2 PDS Cloning . 29 2.3.3 Subcloning PDS into Fragment D . 29 2.3.4 Cloning SGP into Fragment D . 29 2.3.5 Reinserting Missing Viral Sequence . 30 2.3.6 Subcloning recombinant PDS Fragment into Full Length Clone and Binary Vector . 30 2.3.7 Subcloning PDS into GRSPaV-GG . 30 2.4 GFP Expression Vector . 31 2.4.1 GFP Cloning . 31 2.4.2 Reinserting Missing Viral Sequence . 31 2.4.3 Subcloning recombinant GFP Fragment into Full Length Clone and Binary Vector . 32 2.4.4 Subcloning GFP into GRSPaV-GG . 32 2.5 Infectivity Assays in N. benthamiana ................... 32 2.6 Infectivity Assays in V. vinifera ...................... 32 2.7 Analyses . 33 2.7.1 Genome Sequencing . 33 2.7.2 Symptom observation . 33 2.7.3 Western Blotting . 33 2.7.4 Fluorescence Microscopy . 35 v 2.7.5 Bioinformatic & Statistical Analyses . 35 3 RESULTS ..................................... 36 3.1 Construction of wildtype and GFP-tagged full-length clones for GRSPaV isolate VD-102 . 36 3.2 Infectivity of wildtype and GFP-tagged MGT clones in N. benthamiana .............................. 38 3.3 RNA & Protein Structure Predictions . 39 3.4 Effectiveness of pRSPMGT-PDSf and pRSPGG-PDSf as VIGS vectors in N. benthamiana ............................ 40 4 DISCUSSION .................................. 55 5 CONCLUSION .................................. 60 REFERENCES ..................................... 61 A APPENDIX .................................... 78 A.1 Standard Procedures and Procedures . 78 A.1.1 Agarose Gel Purification of DNA . 78 A.1.2 Agrobacterium Transformation . 78 A.1.3 Agroinfiltration of N. benthamiana and V. vinifera ...... 78 A.1.4 Broth Culture and Plasmid Miniprep . 79 A.1.5 Competent A. tumefaciens Preparation . 79 A.1.6 Competent E. coli Preparation . 79 A.1.7 Dephosphorylation . 80 A.1.8 Digestion . 80 A.1.9 E. coli Transformation . 80 A.1.10 KOD Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) . 81 A.1.11 Ligation . 81 A.1.12 Overlap-Extension PCR (OE-PCR) . 81 A.1.13 PaCeR PCR . 82 A.1.14 RNA Extraction . 82 A.1.15 Reverse Transcription (RT) . 82 vi A.1.16 Site-Directed Mutagenesis (SDM) . 82 A.1.17 TA cloning . 83 A.1.18 Taq PCR/Colony PCR . 83 A.2 MGT Consensus Sequence . 83 A.3 Supplementary Figures and Tables . 84 vii LIST OF TABLES 1: Percent nucleotide identity between TA cloned fragments and the GRSPaV-SY and VD-102 genomes. 37 A1: Percent similarity (bottom left) and hamming distance (top right) for genomes/proteins of prominent GRSPaV strains. 90 A2: Primers used for cloning and diagnostic assays. 93 viii LIST OF FIGURES 1: Representative diagram of the GRSPaV genome. 6 2: Syrah Decline (SD) symptoms. 13 3: Rugose Wood Complex (RWC) symptoms. 14 4: Grapevine vein Necrosis (GVN) symptoms in the indicator rootstock 110R. 15 5: Cloning plan based on VD-102 (MF979534.1) isolate. 21 6: Vector map for pCB-301.3. 26 7: Plan for creating GFP-tagged and VIGS vectors from the wildtype GRSPaV- SY clone. 28 8: Coverage Diagram of plan to sequence entire wildtype GRSPaV-SY clone (pBS-SY) genome. 34 9: Multiple sequence alignment of the pRSPMGT and 13 prominent GRSPaV strains shows a gap in VD-102 sequencing. 38 10: Phylogenetic tree of all GRSPaV isolates for which complete or near complete genomes are available. 41 11: Western blot for detecting GRSPaV CP from N. benthamiana agroinfiltrated with pRSPMGT-GFP, pRSPGG-GFP, and pCB-301.3 (–) at 10 days post-infiltration (dpi). 42 12: N. benthamiana infiltrated with pRSPMGT-GFP from 2 to 10 days post-infiltration (dpi) at 100x magnification. 43 13: N. benthamiana infiltrated with pRSPGG-GFP from 2 to 10 days post-infiltration (dpi) at 100x magnification. 44 14: N. benthamiana infiltrated with pRSPGG-GFP (left) and pRSPMGT-GFP (right) in the same leaf from 2 to 10 days post-infiltration (dpi) at 100x magnification. 45 15: Western blot of pooled protein extracts (n=3) for detecting GFP from N. ben- thamiana agroinfiltrated with pRSPMGT-GFP, pRSPGG-GFP, and pCB-301.3 (–) at 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days post-infiltration (dpi). 46 16: Analysis of GFP bands from a Western blot for N. benthamiana agroinfiltrated with pRSPMGT-GFP and pRSPGG-GFP from 2 to 10 days post-infiltration (dpi). A: Normalized density values. B: Normalized percent differences in density values relative to 2 dpi. 47 17: Predicted 2◦ and 3◦ RNA structures of the (+)-sense strands of the 3’ UTRs of MGT and GG. 48 18: Predicted 3◦ protein structures of the replicase domains of MGT (red) and GG (grey). 49 19: Predicted 3◦ protein structures of the proteins of MGT (red) and GG (grey). 50 20: Hydrophobicity plots of proteins for MGT (black) and GG (red). 51 21: Predicted 2◦ and 3◦ RNA structures of the (–)-sense strands of the 97 nt CP SGP region of MGT and GG. 52 22: Predicted 2◦ and 3◦ RNA structures of the (–)-sense strands of the 70 nt CP SGP region minus the CP sgRNA 5’ UTR of MGT and GG.