DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 8 Issue 17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

VOLUME 8 ISSUE 17 JULY 2017 ISSN 1989-9947 Virtual Archaeology Review Volume 8, Issue 17 (2017) Editorial Team Editor-in-Chief José Luis Lerma, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain Associate Editors Editors Emeriti Juan Antonio Barceló, Universitat Autònoma de Alfredo Grande, Sociedad Española de Barcelona, Spain Arqueología Virtual (SEAV)-Virtual Archaeology International Network (INNOVA), Spain Fabio Remondino, Bruno Kessler Foundation (FBK), Italy Víctor Manuel López-Menchero Bendicho, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha - SEAV, Spain Advisory Board Thomas E. Levy, Department of Anthropology & Qualcomm Institute, UC San Diego, United States Livio de Luca, French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), France Sofia Pescarin, CNR ITABC Rome (IT), Italy Markus Reindel, Commission for the Archaeology of Non-European Cultures (KAAK), German Archaeological Institute (DAI), Germany Editorial Board Areti Damala, University of Strathclyde, United Orla Murphy, University College Cork, Ireland Kingdom Eva Pietroni, National Research Council, Institute Inés Domingo Sanz, ICREA, Universitat de of Technologies Applied to Cultural Heritage Barcelona, Spain (CNR ITABC), Italy Michael Doneus, University of Vienna, Austria Daniel Pletinckx, Visual Dimension bvba, Belgium Stephen Fai, Carleton University, Canada Laia Pujol Tost, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain Francisco R. Feito Higueruela, Universidad de Fulvio Rinaudo, Politecnico di Torino, Italy Jaén, Spain Mario Santana Quintero, Carleton University, Andreas Georgopoulos, National Technical Canada University of Athens, Greece Jin Shang, Tsinghua University, China Luis A. Hernández Ibáñez, Universidade da Minna Angelina Silver, University of Oulu, Finland Coruña, Spain Juan Carlos Torres, Universidad de Granada, David Hernández López, Universidad de Castilla Spain La Mancha, Spain Geert J. Verhoeven, LBI for Archaeological Arivaldo Leão de Amorim, Universidade Federal Prospection & Virtual Archaeology, Austria de Bahia, Brazil Editing Committee Matilde Balaguer Puig, Universitat Politècnica de Mª Ángeles Hernández-Barahona Palma, SEAV València, Spain (Secretary), Spain Rand Eppich, Architect. ICOMOS - CIPA Heritage Ángel Marqués Mateu, Universitat Politècnica de Documentation València Published by Universitat Politècnica de València. Official journal of Spanish Society of Virtual Archaeology. Virtual Archaeology Review, 8(17), 2017 ii Virtual Archaeology Review Volume 8, Issue 17 (2017) Contents Delivering and using 3D models on the web: are we ready? 1-9 Roberto Scopigno, Marco Callieri, Matteo Dellepiane, Federico Ponchio, Marco Potenziani Historical imprints and virtual representation issues in Mid-Byzantine Acrocorinth 10-19 Castle Demetrios Athanasoulis, Xeni Simou, Theodora Zirogianni Rebuilding Palmyra virtually: recreation of its former glory in digital space 20-30 Ahmet Denker Recreating a medieval urban scene with virtual intelligent characters: steps to 31-41 create the complete scenario Ana Paula Cláudio, Maria Beatriz Carmo, Alexandre Antonio de Carvalho, Willian Xavier, Rui Filipe Antunes Design of a virtual tour for the enhancement of Llíria’s architectural and urban 42-48 heritage and its surroundings José Miguel Maícas, María José Viñals Digitization of religious artifacts with a structured light scanner 49-55 Alejandro Graciano, Lidia Ortega, Rafael J. Segura, Francisco R. Feito Digital heritage training for historians in Europe: a local proposal 56-63 José-Antonio Ruiz Gil Uso combinado de la fotografía digital nocturna y de la fotogrametría en los 64-74 procesos de documentación de petroglifos: el caso de Alcázar de San Juan (Ciudad Real, España) Víctor Manuel López-Menchero Bendicho, Ángel Marchante Ortega, Matthew L. Vincent, Ángel Javier Cárdenas Martín-Buitrago, Jorge Onrubia Pintado Entorno 3D para el análisis y la recreación virtual de las actuaciones 75-83 arqueológicas en Cueva de la Cocina (Dos Aguas, Valencia, España) Agustín Díez Castillo, Alfredo Cortell Nicolau, Oreto García Puchol, Pilar Escribá Ruiz Modelado 3D del cementerio de la misión salesiana Nuestra Señora de la 84-94 Candelaria (Río Grande, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina) Melisa A. Salerno, Daniel Hereñú, Romina C. Rigone, Ricardo A. Guichón Virtual Archaeology Review, 8(17), 2017 iii Virtual Archaeology Review, 8(17): 1-9, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/var.2017.6405 © UPV, SEAV, 2015 Received: July 25, 2016 Accepted: March 15, 2017 DELIVERING AND USING 3D MODELS ON THE WEB: ARE WE READY? DISTRIBUCIÓN Y USO DE MODELOS 3D EN LA WEB: ¿ESTAMOS LISTOS? Roberto Scopigno*, Marco Callieri, Matteo Dellepiane, Federico Ponchio, Marco Potenziani Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell’Informazione “Alessandro Faedo” (ISTI), CNR, via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy. [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: Digital technologies are now mature for producing high quality digital replicas of Cultural Heritage (CH) assets. The research results produced in the last decade ignited an impressive evolution and consolidation of the technologies for acquiring high-quality digital three-dimensional (3D) models, encompassing both geometry and color. What remains still an open problem is how to deliver those data and related knowledge to our society. The web is nowadays the main channel for the dissemination of knowledge. Emerging commercial solutions for web-publishing of 3D data are consolidating and becoming a de-facto standard for many applications (e-commerce, industrial products, education, etc.). In this framework, CH is a very specific domain, requiring highly flexible solutions. Some recent experiences are presented, aimed at providing a support to the archival of archaeological 3D data, supporting web-based publishing of very high-resolution digitization results and finally enabling the documentation of complex restoration actions. All those examples have been recently implemented on the open-source 3D Heritage Online Presenter (3DHOP) platform, developed at CNR-ISTI. Key words: 3D digitization, virtual archaeology, cultural heritage, documentation, web-based 3D visualization, restoration Resumen: Las tecnologías digitales están ahora maduras para producir réplicas digitales de alta calidad de valores activos del patrimonio cultural (CH). Los resultados de la investigación producidos en la última década han mostrado una evolución impresionante y una consolidación de las tecnologías para la captura de modelos digitales tridimensionales (3D) de alta calidad, que abarcan la geometría y el color. Lo que queda aún por resolver está relacionado con la forma de distribuir los datos y el conocimiento relacionado con la sociedad. La web es hoy en día el principal canal utilizado para divulgar el conocimiento. Las soluciones comerciales nuevas relacionadas con la publicación en la red de datos en 3D se están consolidando y convirtiendo en un estándar de facto para muchas aplicaciones (comercio electrónico, productos industriales, educación, etc.). En este escenario, el patrimonio cultural es un dominio muy específico, que requiere soluciones muy flexibles. Se presentan algunas experiencias recientes, destinadas a proporcionar un apoyo al archivo de los datos arqueológicos 3D, la publicación web de los resultados de digitalización de muy alta resolución que permiten finalmente la documentación de trabajos de restauración complejos. Todos estos ejemplos se han implementado recientemente en la plataforma 3D Heritage Online Presenter (3DHOP) de código abierto, desarrollada en el CNR-ISTI. Palabras clave: digitalización 3D, arqueología virtual, patrimonio cultural, documentación, visualización web 3D, restauración 1. Introduction panoramic/360º images; standard videos or omnidirectional videos) or the geometrical/shape Multiple digital technologies are experimented in Digital characteristics of a CH artefact or scene (using one of the Humanities (DH); those instruments are going to play an many 3D representation incarnations). important role in the study, dissemination and didactical A number of enabling technologies have been developed activities related to our Cultural Heritage (CH). These and matured in the last years to sample the artworks of technologies cover many different types of applications interest. Sampling devices are then paired by processing and are the results of intensive research in many scientific technologies, data optimization tools (e.g. providing domains (not just Computer Science but also Optics, simplification and multiresolution features to increase the Physics, Chemistry, etc.). More specifically, Computer usability of very high resolution samplings), efficient Science is offering many different opportunities to archival systems, search and retrieval facilities and, manage visual data at unprecedented levels of accuracy finally, tools for web presentation. and ease of use. The term visual data is intended here to encompass all digital visual representations we can adopt The latter domain is the main focus of this paper. to produce a useful sampling of either the visual Nowadays the web is the place consulted by everybody characteristics (by means of: standard 2D images; more searching for knowledge or digital content. This is sophisticated image media, such as RTI or definitely true for needs related to teaching or to *Corresponding author: Roberto Scopigno, [email protected] 1 SCOPIGNO et al., 2017 personal interest (and in this case Wikipedia or systems technologies
Recommended publications
  • Monuments of Terrorism: (De)Selecting Memory and Symbolic Exchange at the Interface Between Westminster and Raqqa

    Monuments of Terrorism: (De)Selecting Memory and Symbolic Exchange at the Interface Between Westminster and Raqqa

    Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies Vol. 16, No. 2 (2020) Monuments of Terrorism: (De)Selecting Memory and Symbolic Exchange at the Interface Between Westminster and Raqqa Theodore Price Contemporary conflict is conducted across multiple visual fronts, as the old visual symbols of conventional warfare and remembrance are increasingly replaced with digital images. Focusing on three events in the summer of 2015: the attack on tourists in Tunisia, the blowing up of the Temple of Bel in Palmyra, Syria, and the construction of a replica of the destroyed Arch of Triumph from Palmyra in Trafalgar Square, London, this paper details the symbolic exchange between the so-called Islamic State and western governments. Through an examination of the visual representation of violence enacted towards individual holidaymakers and ancient tourist sites, this paper details how the attack on a holiday resort in Tuni- sia was recast through a master narrative of war where the military repatriation of civilians represented the dead tourists as fallen soldiers. It will examine the visual record of the destruction of the Temple of Bel, by the Islamic State (ISIS), arguing that this action gained international legitimacy through the validation and complicity of the visual frame provided by satellite images from the United Na- tions. Finally, it will discuss the replication of the Arch of Triumph, from Palmyra, in Trafalgar Square as a further example of the instrumentalisation of counter- iconoclasm. In this paper I suggest that the new monuments to terrorism are images of the events themselves, rather than simply physical memorials built for remem- brance, and that these new monuments to terrorism circulating within the virtual landscapes of the internet, become the new sites of collective memorialisation Theodore Price is a London-based artist, curator and researcher whose practice is located at the intersection between art and politics.
  • 1. Introduction

    1. Introduction

    This PDF is a simplified version of the original article published in Internet Archaeology. All links also go to the online version. Please cite this as: Nicholson, C., Fernandez, R. and Irwin, J. 2021 Digital Archaeological Data in the Wild West: the challenge of practising responsible digital data archiving and access in the United States, Internet Archaeology 58. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.22 Digital Archaeological Data in the Wild West: the challenge of practising responsible digital data archiving and access in the United States Christopher Nicholson, Rachel Fernandez and Jessica Irwin Summary Archaeology in the United States is conducted by a number of different sorts of entities under a variety of legal mandates that lack uniform standards for data archiving. The difficulty of accessing data from projects in which one was not directly involved indicates an apparent reluctance to archive raw data and supplemental information with digital repositories to be reused in the future. There is hope that additional legislation, guidelines from professional organisations, and educational efforts will change these practices. 1. Introduction Though we are well into the 21st century, responsible digital archiving of archaeological data in the United States is not common practice. Digital archiving of cultural resource management reports in State Historic Preservation Offices, where they are often available by request though perhaps at a cost, is common; however, digitally archiving the datasets and other supporting materials that went into the creation of those documents is not. Though a vocal minority advocates for responsible digital archiving practices (Kansa and Kansa 2013; 2018; Kansa et al.
  • Methods in Digital Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Katy Meyers Emery

    Methods in Digital Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Katy Meyers Emery

    Methods in Digital Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Katy Meyers Emery Increasingly over the last decade, anthropologists have looked to digital tools as a way to improve their interpretations, engage with the public and other professionals, collaborate with other disciplines, develop new technology to improve the discipline and more. Due to the increasing importance of digital, it is important that current students become equipped with the skills and confidence necessary to creatively and thoughtfully apply digital tools to cultural heritage questions. With that in mind, this course is not a lecture- it is an open discussion and development course where students will learn digital tools by using and making them. This course will provide students with an introduction to digital tools in archaeology, from using social media to engage with communities to developing their own online projects to preserve, protect, share and engage with cultural heritage and archaeology. Course Goals: 1. Understand and articulate the benefits and challenges of digital methods within archaeology and cultural heritage management 2. Critically use digital methods to engage with the public and archaeological community online to promote cultural and archaeological heritage and preservation (ex. Blogging, Twitter, Digital Mapping, etc) 3. Leverage digital tools to create a digital project focused on archaeology or cultural heritage Texts: All reading material for this course will be provided online, although students may need to request or find their own reading material related to a historic site for their final project. **This syllabus was designed based on a course that I helped develop and teach over summer 2014, a Mobile Cultural Heritage Informatics class I assisted in during summer 2011, and my years as a Cultural Heritage Informatics Initiative fellow.
  • Art: Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery

    Art: Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery

    UCLA Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press Title Art: Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5xf6b5zd ISBN 978-1-938770-08-1 Author Scott, David A. Publication Date 2016-12-01 Data Availability The data associated with this publication are within the manuscript. Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California READ ONLY/NO DOWNLOADS Art: Art: Authenticity, Restoration, ForgeryRestoration, Authenticity, Art: Forgery Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery David A. Scott his book presents a detailed account of authenticity in the visual arts from the Palaeolithic to the postmodern. The restoration of works Tof art can alter the perception of authenticity, and may result in the creation of fakes and forgeries. These interactions set the stage for the subject of this book, which initially examines the conservation perspective, then continues with a detailed discussion of what “authenticity” means, and the philosophical background. Included are several case studies that discuss conceptual, aesthetic, and material authenticity of ancient and modern art in the context of restoration and forgery. • Scott Above: An artwork created by the author as a conceptual appropriation of the original Egyptian faience objects. Do these copies possess the same intangible authenticity as the originals? Photograph by David A. Scott On front cover: Cast of author’s hand with Roman mask. Photograph by David A. Scott MLKRJBKQ> AO@E>BLILDF@> 35 MLKRJBKQ> AO@E>BLILDF@> 35 CLQPBK IKPQFQRQB LC AO@E>BLILDV POBPP CLQPBK IKPQFQRQB LC AO@E>BLILDV POBPP CIoA Press READ ONLY/NO DOWNLOADS Art: Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery READ ONLY/NO DOWNLOADS READ ONLY/NO DOWNLOADS Art: Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery David A.
  • The Palmyrene Prosopography

    The Palmyrene Prosopography

    THE PALMYRENE PROSOPOGRAPHY by Palmira Piersimoni University College London Thesis submitted for the Higher Degree of Doctor of Philosophy London 1995 C II. TRIBES, CLANS AND FAMILIES (i. t. II. TRIBES, CLANS AND FAMILIES The problem of the social structure at Palmyra has already been met by many authors who have focused their interest mainly to the study of the tribal organisation'. In dealing with this subject, it comes natural to attempt a distinction amongst the so-called tribes or family groups, for they are so well and widely attested. On the other hand, as shall be seen, it is not easy to define exactly what a tribe or a clan meant in terms of structure and size and which are the limits to take into account in trying to distinguish them. At the heart of Palmyrene social organisation we find not only individuals or families but tribes or groups of families, in any case groups linked by a common (true or presumed) ancestry. The Palmyrene language expresses the main gentilic grouping with phd2, for which the Greek corresponding word is ØuAi in the bilingual texts. The most common Palmyrene formula is: dynwpbd biiyx... 'who is from the tribe of', where sometimes the word phd is omitted. Usually, the term bny introduces the name of a tribe that either refers to a common ancestor or represents a guild as the Ben Komarê, lit. 'the Sons of the priest' and the Benê Zimrâ, 'the sons of the cantors' 3 , according to a well-established Semitic tradition of attaching the guilds' names to an ancestor, so that we have the corporations of pastoral nomads, musicians, smiths, etc.
  • DIGITAL ARCHAEOLOGY of HERITAGE BUILDINGS of WEST AFRICA Ghana – 28 May – 1 July

    DIGITAL ARCHAEOLOGY of HERITAGE BUILDINGS of WEST AFRICA Ghana – 28 May – 1 July

    NEW Summer 2017 Field School in DIGITAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF HERITAGE BUILDINGS OF WEST AFRICA Ghana – 28 May – 1 July Focusing on the Elmina Castle (1482, Ghana) the school introduces the principles of structural diagnostics of heritage masonry buildings with the aim to produce a systematic survey (manual, photogrammetric, laser scanning, aerial drone photography) and related digital reconstructions of select areas of the Castle. The school also fosters the understanding of the historical environment, and in particular the pivotal role in the Transatlantic World, of Elmina Castle through study visits to other forts and castles in coastal Ghana. In addition, the school offers a broader view of Ghana’s natural and cultural heritage through guided visits to selected archaeological sites and national parks. There are no pre-requisites. The field school is designed to attract undergraduate and graduate students in the humanities, social sciences, and engineering interested in acquiring skills in a multidisciplinary environment. Faculty: Prof. Renato Perucchio, Co-director – Mechanical Engineering and Director, Archaeology Technology and Historical Structures, University of Rochester – [email protected] ; Prof. Kodzo Gavua, Co-director – Archaeology and Heritage Studies and Dean, School of Arts, College of Humanities, University of Ghana - [email protected] ; Prof. Michael Jarvis, History and Director, Digital Media Studies, University of Rochester - [email protected] ; and Prof. William Gblerkpor, Archaeology and Heritage
  • FROM MOSUL to PALMYRA a Virtual Journey Through the World’S Cultural Heritage 30 August 2019 – 3 November 2019

    FROM MOSUL to PALMYRA a Virtual Journey Through the World’S Cultural Heritage 30 August 2019 – 3 November 2019

    Press kit FROM MOSUL TO PALMYRA A Virtual Journey through the World’s Cultural Heritage 30 August 2019 – 3 November 2019 1 CONTENT Media Conference: Thursday, 29 August 2019, 11 a.m. 1. Forewords of the publication Page 3 2. Media Information Page 5 3. Exhibition Sections Page 6 4. Virtual Reality and Epilogue Page 12 5. Virtual Reconstruction and Publication Page 13 6. Current and Upcoming Exhibitions Page 14 7. General Information Page 15 2 FOREWORDS OF THE PUBLICATION In recent years, some of the most splendid cities of the ancient world – Mosul, Aleppo, Palmyra, Leptis Magna – have come to be associated with the wanton destruction of their vestiges by fanaticism and war. These ancient sites, some of them completely laid to waste, bear witness to recent and current conflicts that affect us directly. A virtual journey to the sites reveals the disastrous consequences of war on every level, inclu- ding culture. These consequences reach far beyond the regrettable loss of outstanding artefacts of long-gone civilizations. The intentional destruction of cultural heritage constitutes an attempt to obliterate cultural identity. The historical memory of the multireligious sites stands for those achievements of civilization that are now massive- ly threatened by war and terror. While each of the four emblematic sites, which visitors to the exhibition can explo- re in virtual models and reconstructions, tells its own story, they have one thing in common: they embody the universality of our concept of culture, which prizes the individuality and diversity of the remains of numerous ancient civilizations without subjecting them to religious or national hierarchies.
  • Monumental Computations. Digital Archaeology of Large Urban And

    Monumental Computations. Digital Archaeology of Large Urban And

    Visualising the Past through the Virtual Image Virtual Reconstitutions as interpretations of knowledge Tiago CRUZ, University of Porto, Portugal Abstract: The image has the power to mean something, to tell, to express, to represent, and to present. Based on a reflection upon the place of the virtual image in the visuali- sation of the past, the present article seeks to answer to the transformations that result from the digital revolution, with implications in our relationship with History and in our experience of the built heritage. With the aim of returning the old Convent of Monchique to the city of Porto (Portugal) and its community, the interpretation of knowledge is ex- plored here by using the virtual image as an instrument for the visualisation of the past, in its visibilities and invisibilities, through interpretative exercises of the past, guided by historical accuracy, authenticity, and scientific transparency. Due to the profound formal and functional changes it has undergone over time—even prior to its foundation, in the 16th century, and up to the present—, the convent presents itself as an ideal example to test the use of scientific methodologies and their validity in an interpretative visualisation of the past. Keywords: Virtual image—digital reconstruction—data authenticity—uncertain data— reconstructions CHNT Reference: Tiago Cruz. 2021. Visualising the Past through the Virtual Image. Börner, Wolf- gang; Kral-Börner, Christina, and Rohland, Hendrik (eds.), Monumental Computations: Digital Ar- chaeology of Large Urban and Underground Infrastructures. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies, held in Vienna, Austria, November 2019. Heidelberg: Propylaeum.
  • Exhibition Checklist I. Creating Palmyra's Legacy

    Exhibition Checklist I. Creating Palmyra's Legacy

    EXHIBITION CHECKLIST 1. Caravan en route to Palmyra, anonymous artist after Louis-François Cassas, ca. 1799. Proof-plate etching. 15.5 x 27.3 in. (29.2 x 39.5 cm). The Getty Research Institute, 840011 I. CREATING PALMYRA'S LEGACY Louis-François Cassas Artist and Architect 2. Colonnade Street with Temple of Bel in background, Georges Malbeste and Robert Daudet after Louis-François Cassas. Etching. Plate mark: 16.9 x 36.6 in. (43 x 93 cm). From Voyage pittoresque de la Syrie, de la Phoénicie, de la Palestine, et de la Basse Egypte (Paris, ca. 1799), vol. 1, pl. 58. The Getty Research Institute, 840011 1 3. Architectural ornament from Palmyra tomb, Jean-Baptiste Réville and M. A. Benoist after Louis-François Cassas. Etching. Plate mark: 18.3 x 11.8 in. (28.5 x 45 cm). From Voyage pittoresque de la Syrie, de la Phoénicie, de la Palestine, et de la Basse Egypte (Paris, ca. 1799), vol. 1, pl. 137. The Getty Research Institute, 840011 4. Louis-François Cassas sketching outside of Homs before his journey to Palmyra (detail), Simon-Charles Miger after Louis-François Cassas. Etching. Plate mark: 8.4 x 16.1 in. (21.5 x 41cm). From Voyage pittoresque de la Syrie, de la Phoénicie, de la Palestine, et de la Basse Egypte (Paris, ca. 1799), vol. 1, pl. 20. The Getty Research Institute, 840011 5. Louis-François Cassas presenting gifts to Bedouin sheikhs, Simon Charles-Miger after Louis-François Cassas. Etching. Plate mark: 8.4 x 16.1 in. (21.5 x 41 cm).
  • The Destruction of Cultural Heritage: a Crime Against Property Or a Crime Against People?

    The Destruction of Cultural Heritage: a Crime Against Property Or a Crime Against People?

    THE JOHN MARSHALL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW THE DESTRUCTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE: A CRIME AGAINST PROPERTY OR A CRIME AGAINST PEOPLE? PATTY GERSTENBLITH ABSTRACT The destruction of cultural heritage has played a prominent role in the ongoing conflicts in Syria and Iraq and in the recent conflict in Mali. This destruction has displayed the failure of international law to effectively deter these actions. This article reviews existing international law in light of this destruction and the challenges posed by the issues of non-international armed conflict, non-state actors and the military necessity exception. By examining recent developments in applicable international law, the article proposes that customary international law has evolved to interpret existing legal instruments and doctrines concerning cultural heritage in light of the principles of proportionality and distinction and a definition of intentionality that includes extreme negligence and willful disregard. As a result, international law may more effectively foster the preservation of cultural heritage for future generations. Copyright © 2016 The John Marshall Law School Cite as Patty Gerstenblith, The Destruction of Cultural Heritage: A Crime Against Property or a Crime Against People?, 15 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 336 (2016). THE DESTRUCTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE: A CRIME AGAINST PROPERTY OR A CRIME AGAINST PEOPLE? PATTY GERSTENBLITH I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................
  • Protecting Cultural Property in Non-International Armed Conflicts: Syria and Iraq

    Protecting Cultural Property in Non-International Armed Conflicts: Syria and Iraq

    Protecting Cultural Property in Non-International Armed Conflicts: Syria and Iraq Louise Arimatsu and Mohbuba Choudhury 91 INT’L L. STUD. 641 (2015) Volume 91 2015 Published by the Stockton Center for the Study of International Law International Law Studies 2015 Protecting Cultural Property in Non-International Armed Conflicts: Syria and Iraq Louise Arimatsu and Mohbuba Choudhury CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................................................................................ 641 II. Why We Protect Cultural Property .......................................................... 646 III. The Outbreak of the Current Armed Conflicts and the Fate of Cultural Property ....................................................................................................... 655 A. Syria ....................................................................................................... 656 B. Iraq ......................................................................................................... 666 IV. The Legal Landscape in Context ............................................................. 670 A. Obligations on the Parties to the Conflict ....................................... 671 B. Consequences of a Failure to Comply with Obligations ............... 685 V. Concluding Comments .............................................................................. 695 I. INTRODUCTION O n June 24, 2014, a month after ISIS1 leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi de- clared the formation of an Islamic Caliphate stretching from northern
  • Huggett, J. (2015) a Manifesto for an Introspective Digital Archaeology

    Huggett, J. (2015) a Manifesto for an Introspective Digital Archaeology

    Huggett, J. (2015) A manifesto for an introspective digital archaeology. Open Archaeology, 1(1). pp. 86-95. Copyright © 2015 The Authors. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) Version: Published http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/104047/ Deposited on: 17 Mar 2015 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Open Archaeology 2015; 1: 86–95 Original Study Open Access Jeremy Huggett A Manifesto for an Introspective Digital Archaeology Abstract: This paper presents a grand challenge for Digital Archaeology of a different kind: it is not technical in and of itself, it does not seek out technological solutions for archaeological problems, it does not propose new digital tools or digital methodologies as such. Instead, it proposes a broader challenge, one which addresses the very stuff of archaeology: an understanding of how digital technologies influence and alter our relationships with data, from their creation and storage ultimately through to the construction of archaeological knowledge. It argues that currently this area is under-theorised, under-represented, and under-valued, yet it is increasingly fundamental to the way in which we arrive at an understanding of the past. Keywords: digital archaeology, digital data, introspection, digital intervention, digital intermediation DOI 10.1515/opar-2015-0002 Received December 4, 2014; accepted February 2, 2015 1 Ghosts in the machine In 2011, James Bridle coined the term New Aesthetic to describe his curation of a series of images on Tumblr which he saw as pointing “towards new ways of seeing the world, an echo of the society, technology, politics and people that co-produce them ..