DOCSLIB.ORG

Distinguishing Ecological Engineering from Environmental Engineering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distinguishing Ecological Engineering from Environmental Engineering Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 389–407 Distinguishing ecological engineering from environmental engineering T.F.H. Allen a,∗, M. Giampietro b, A.M. Little a a Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1381, USA b INRAN-Unit of Technological Assessment, Rome, Italy Accepted 4 August 2003 Abstract This paper uses complex system thinking to identify key peculiarities of ecological engineering. In particular it focuses on the distinction between the purpose-driven design of structures in environmental engineering and the natural process of self-organization characteristic of life, which needs to be integrated into ecological engineering. Conventional engineering addresses the problem of fabrication of an organized structure, say a road, which reflects a goal at the outset, as well as considerations external to the road. At the outset there is an essence of which the organized structure is a realization. This realization belongs to a certain type (apartment building, suspension bridge). The type is in relation to: (a) the expected contexts (e.g. housing in Manhattan, a bridge in rural Africa) and (b) location-specific socio-economic constraints (low/high economic budget). Conventional engineering does not question the goals of the selected plan and can only object to the feasibility of a proposed typology in a given context. Engineers deal with the challenge of the realization of a plan at a given point in space and time. The central dogma of biology identifies organisms as informationally-closed and this makes possible their use as machines. Ecological systems, on the contrary, are informationally-open. They cannot be used as machines to create functional structures, because they are becoming in time. For engineered structures to work it is usually required that there is (1) stability of system components; (2) admissibility of a workable context; (3) validity of purpose and concept. Ecologically-engineered structures challenge these requirements because of specificity of required environments and lability of system parts over the time the engineered structure functions. Other engineering is better if it achieves flexibility, but ecological engineering must be so flexible as to take on a looping character that updates the system to meet changing requirements. Accordingly, the original goals cannot be taken for granted later in the process of ecological engineering. Ecological engineering has to be a flexible iterative process of design, in which the designer must continually update goals, essences, typologies and processes of realization. © 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V. Keywords: Ecological engineering; Complex systems thinking; Hierarchy theory; Rosen; Multiple scales; Beavers; Self-organization 1. Introduction Ecological engineering is one of several branches ∗ Corresponding author. of engineering that involves dealing with living ma- E-mail address: [email protected] (T.F.H. Allen). terial. Sometimes technological processes use living 0925-8574/$ – see front matter © 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2003.08.007 390 T.F.H. Allen et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 389–407 organisms as machines, as in draft animals, fermen- are genuinely ecological. There are good reasons to tation agents or genetically-modified organisms. For cleave ecological engineering from civil and industrial the purposes of this paper, whether the horse power engineering, the orthodox categories of engineering to pulling a given load is generated by real horses or which environmental engineering naturally belongs. by a horse-equivalent generated by a steam engine is We believe that a solid body of knowledge already not the critical part of the story. The important point exists in the field of theoretical ecology, hierarchy the- for our narrative is that biological material introduced ory, and complex systems thinking that can clarify the into an engineering process or engineered structure situation. This clearer vision can generate in ecolog- requires a richer characterization of what should be ical engineering something of the sound predictions considered as a machine or an ecological system. This and proper precaution that are characteristic of engi- paper addresses that richer characterization, and what neering at large. However, this can only occur when it means for grouping types of engineering with their ecological engineers are conscious of the distinctive- respective distinct styles. ness of their practice relative to other types of en- Use of biological material has generated some con- gineering. The theory to which we refer introduces fusion as to the categorization of engineering in bio- a clear distinction between: (i) a process of design logical and ecological settings. Various adjectives and and fabrication of machines driven by human purpose, nouns have been freely combined in terms such as i.e. environmental engineering as described above and “ecological engineering”, “genetic engineering”, “bi- (ii) the processes of autopoiesis (self-definition) and ological monitoring” or “bio-chemical engineering”. self-organization (emergence or order) typical of life Sometimes entirely new terms have been coined, such and ecological systems (Maturana and Varela, 1980, as “bionics”. This new terminology, with its prefixes 1998) i.e. ecological engineering. of bio-, genetic-, or eco-, encourages a mistaken view This paper is divided in three sections. Section 1 that systems engineered to employ living things still deals with basic differences between conventional en- belong to the realm of ecology and ecological systems. gineering (which in our view still includes environ- Organisms employed as machines may not be as reli- mental engineering) and ecological engineering. This able as physical machine, but they can be constrained distinction is framed using concepts developed in the well enough so as to behave like ordinary machines. field of complex system thinking, especially in rela- In beer brewing or in cheese vats the context of the tion to theoretical ecology (i.e. the characterization organisms is tightly and skillfully constrained so that of “life-itself” as developed by Robert Rosen (1991, the cultures perform with reliability. The required con- 2000)). stancy of those created environments means we are Section 2 focuses on the peculiar challenges faced dealing there with engineering not ecology. Such sys- by ecological engineers. While organisms may be tems do not suffer from the constant change that is used as machines, we deny that ecological systems can ubiquitous in ecology at all levels. By contrast, what be used as machines to create ecologically-engineered the authors here call ecological engineering is still part functional structures. Unlike organisms, ecological of ecology and so must deal with the process of change systems are informationally-open, and cannot be used that can be expected at all levels. Environmental, not reliably in the medium term, let alone for extended ecological, engineering generally works only with the long-term periods. Rather than work as agents of structure. That is to say, environmental engineering creation, ecological processes act as constraints and lists its components and evaluates the effects of the perturbations on both the environment of the realiza- ecosystem on the components. Therefore environmen- tion process and the functional engineered structure. tal engineering remains part of engineering, although Koestler (1967) refers to the associative context as it has an awareness of ecology. Environmental engi- the context in which a process may occur or a struc- neering uses organisms as machine, but that does not ture may exist, part of which may be the context that make it ecological engineering. Confusing organismal makes the function of an engineered structure useful. machines with ecological situations is dangerous, be- Ecological engineering deals with structures whose cause it encourages over-confidence in the calculations realization process and structured functionality is dis- and predictions as to the engineering of situations that rupted by failure of the associative context such that T.F.H. Allen et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 389–407 391 the original goals must be revisited. This is due to the give living material the constancy of behavior that systemic mismatch in time scale between: (a) the pace normally characterizes non-living materials. An ex- at which human decision making and engineering op- ample might be the engineered environment that keeps erates and (b) the pace at which ecological processes bacteria behaving in the desired manner of a sewage update their typologies and mechanisms of control. works. By contrast, the ecological engineer attempts Section 3 discusses the implications of a case study to live with the dynamical behavior of life and its con- provided by ecological engineering performed by stant change of purpose. There is a biological learning beavers: beavers show flexible/multiple scale strate- process here that is not often part of conventional gies. Beavers engineer at different levels of analysis engineering. In contrast to all other engineering, the simultaneously. This enables them to deal better with ecological engineer co-opts a creative process that is the complexity of ecological processes on different intrinsic to the emergent biological structure. Engi- scales. The cost to the beavers is that this forces them neers facing ecological dynamics would do well to to adapt their identity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Education in Ecological Engineering—Aneedwhose Time Has Come
    Circular Economy and Sustainability https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00067-4 ORIGINAL PAPER Education in Ecological Engineering—aNeedWhose Time Has Come Glenn Dale1,2 & Gabriela Dotro3 & Puneet Srivastava 4 & David Austin5 & Stacy Hutchinson6 & Peter Head7 & Ashantha Goonetilleke8 & Alexandros Stefanakis9 & Ranka Junge10 & José A. Fernández L. 11 & Vanessa Weyer12 & Wayne Truter 12 & Devi Bühler10 & John Bennett 2 & Hongbo Liu13 & Zifu Li14 & Jianqiang Du 15,16 & Petra Schneider17 & Jochen Hack18 & Andreas Schönborn 10 Received: 4 March 2021 /Accepted: 8 March 2021/ # The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Overcoming Limitations of Ecology and Engineering in Addressing Society’sChallengesBy providing an integrated, systems-approach to problem-solving that incorporates ecolog- ical principles in engineering design, ecological engineering addresses, many of the limitations of Ecology and Engineering needed to work out how people and nature can beneficially coexist on planet Earth. Despite its origins in the 1950s, ecological engineer- ing remains a niche discipline, while at the same time, there has never been a greater need to combine the rigour of engineering and science with the systems-approach of ecology for pro-active management of Earth’s biodiversity and environmental life-support sys- tems. Broad consensus on the scope and defining elements of ecological engineering and development of a globally consistent ecological engineering curriculum are key pillars to mainstream recognition of the discipline and practice of ecological engineering. The Importance of Ecological Engineering in Society In this paper, the importance of ecological engineering education is discussed in relation to the perceived need of our society to address global challenges of sustainable development. The perceived needs of industry, practitioners, educators and students for skills in ecological engineering are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Awareness and Conceptual Understanding Through a Pilot Sustainable Development Module
    AC 2011-1917: FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ ENVIRONMEN- TAL AWARENESS AND CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING THROUGH A PILOT SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MODULE Nicole R. Weber, Purdue University She is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. degree in Ecology, Evolution and Behavior from the University of Minnesota, St. Paul. At the University of Massachusetts Boston, she received her Ph.D. in Environmental Biology with an emphasis in Science Education. Her current research is working in ”sustainable engineering” education, creating awareness of engineering as a ”caring” discipline. A discipline where engineers incorporate the ecological footprint into their design, keeping in mind related social and ecological impacts. Melissa Dyehouse, Purdue University Melissa Dyehouse is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE). She received her M.S.Ed. and Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from Purdue University with a focus on educational research methodology and assessment. Her research at INSPIRE focuses on the learning and teaching of engineering as a ”caring” discipline in the context of environmen- tal and ecological concerns. Constance A Harris, Purdue University She is a doctoral candidate in the College of Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. degree in Political Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In addition, she earned M.S. in Interdisciplinary Studies from DePaul University located in Chicago, Illinois, and a M.A. in Communication Studies from Purdue University Calumet located in Hammond, Indiana. Currently, she works as a research assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Term Deforestation Assessment in Jharkhand State, India: a Grid Based Geospatial Approach
    Biological Forum – An International Journal 9(1): 183-188(2017) ISSN No. (Print): 0975-1130 ISSN No. (Online): 2249-3239 Long Term Deforestation Assessment in Jharkhand state, India: A grid based Geospatial Approach Firoz Ahmad* and Laxmi Goparaju* *Vindhyan Ecology and Natural History Foundation, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India. (Corresponding author: Laxmi Goparaju) (Received 15 March 2017, Accepted 18 June, 2017) (Published by Research Trend, Website: www.researchtrend.net) ABSTRACT: Forest is a fundamental component of the environment. Deforestation is caused by various anthropogenic factors, forest fire and fragmentation of large contiguous forests. Deforestation represents a global issue mostly caused by human influence and the forest of Jharkhand, India is not an exception as they have also been witnessing large scale deforestation. The aim of the present study is to identify deforestation using historical data for the year 1935 (Survey of India topographical maps of 1924–1935) and for the year of 2015 with Landsat -8 datasets in Jharkhand, India. To achieve this objective, the analysis focuses on grid (5 km*5 km) based assessment to detect long term change. The grid based analysis reveals forest percent in Jharkhand for the year 1935 and 2015 were roughly 49% and 23% respectively. The result shows 2596 forest grid for the year 1935 out of which 1372 forest grids were found present in the year 2015. 1224 forest grid (equivalent to 26% forest area) was lost during the span of 80 years. The analysis of remote sensing data in GIS domain and its derived product must be incorporated in forest conservation; management and planning which will certainly fetch better result in decision making support system.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services Generated by Fish Populations
    AR-211 Ecological Economics 29 (1999) 253 –268 ANALYSIS Ecosystem services generated by fish populations Cecilia M. Holmlund *, Monica Hammer Natural Resources Management, Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, S-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden Abstract In this paper, we review the role of fish populations in generating ecosystem services based on documented ecological functions and human demands of fish. The ongoing overexploitation of global fish resources concerns our societies, not only in terms of decreasing fish populations important for consumption and recreational activities. Rather, a number of ecosystem services generated by fish populations are also at risk, with consequences for biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and ultimately human welfare. Examples are provided from marine and freshwater ecosystems, in various parts of the world, and include all life-stages of fish. Ecosystem services are here defined as fundamental services for maintaining ecosystem functioning and resilience, or demand-derived services based on human values. To secure the generation of ecosystem services from fish populations, management approaches need to address the fact that fish are embedded in ecosystems and that substitutions for declining populations and habitat losses, such as fish stocking and nature reserves, rarely replace losses of all services. © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Ecosystem services; Fish populations; Fisheries management; Biodiversity 1. Introduction 15 000 are marine and nearly 10 000 are freshwa­ ter (Nelson, 1994). Global capture fisheries har­ Fish constitute one of the major protein sources vested 101 million tonnes of fish including 27 for humans around the world. There are to date million tonnes of bycatch in 1995, and 11 million some 25 000 different known fish species of which tonnes were produced in aquaculture the same year (FAO, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Engineering for Biodiversity Adaptation to Climate Change
    LAND AND WATER Ecological engineering for biodiversity adaptation to climate change Background Managing contemporary environmental needs whilst ensuring Natural Resource Management (NRM) investment is future‐proofed to withstand climate change is a key challenge for environmental managers in the 21st century. To address this challenge, the Department of the Environment and the CSIRO are collaborating to identify and develop a new generation of climate‐ready ‘ecological engineering’ approaches. What is ecological engineering? The project defines ecological engineering as ‘the design, manipulation or construction of self‐sustaining ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature’. We use this term in place of ‘ecological restoration’, because restoring characteristics from pre‐existing communities may not be viable in a changing climate. Rather, we may need modified designs and approaches, informed by forecasting tools, to maximise future climate‐ resilience. Why would we need to engineer Australian ecosystems? Governments across Australia have invested billions of dollars in ecosystem restoration through national and state and territory Natural Resource Management (NRM) programs. These investments are occurring in an environment of accelerated climatic change. For example, significant ecological restoration is being undertaken in Australia’s southern agricultural zones to sequester carbon, restore landscape connectivity and habitat for native biodiversity, ameliorate salinisation and provide other ecosystem services. Climate projections
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Tropical Forests on Lands Mined for Bauxite: Examples from the Brazilian Amazon
    Ecological Engineering 17 (2001) 219–239 www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoleng Restoring tropical forests on lands mined for bauxite: Examples from the Brazilian Amazon John A. Parrotta a,*, Oliver H. Knowles b a International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Ser6ice, P.O. Box 25000, Rı´o Piedras, PR 00928-5000, USA b C.P. 15, Santare´m, 68005.970 Para´, Brazil Accepted 19 August 2000 Abstract Restoring self-sustaining tropical forest ecosystems on surface mined sites is a formidable challenge that requires the integration of proven reclamation techniques and reforestation strategies appropriate to specific site conditions, including landscape biodiversity patterns. Restorationists working in most tropical settings are usually hampered by lack of basic information on the wide variety of native tree species that characterize the pre-disturbance forests, as well as insufficient understanding of the ecology of disturbance and natural recovery to design effective restoration programs. A notable exception to this is the forest restoration program developed since the early 1980s by a Brazilian bauxite mining company operating at Trombetas in Para´ State in central Amazonia. A systematic nursery and field research strategy was used to develop a reforestation program based on mixed plantings of more than 70 native old-growth forest tree species. This technique has been used to replant about 100 ha of deforested minelands each year over the past 15 years. Research in recent years has evaluated this approach and other, generally simpler, reforestation methods used at a smaller scale at this site. Post-plantation biodiversity development and other indicators of restoration success or sustainability were recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Engineering and Restoration of Eroded Muddy Coasts in South East Asia: Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations
    sustainability Review Ecological Engineering and Restoration of Eroded Muddy Coasts in South East Asia: Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations Huynh Van Tien, Nguyen Tuan Anh , Nguyen Tan Phong * and Mai Le Minh Nhut Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; [email protected] (H.V.T.); [email protected] (N.T.A.); [email protected] (M.L.M.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Ecological engineering (EE) was employed for developing strategies for stabilizing eroded muddy coasts (EMCs). However, there was a limited analysis of these EE strategies with respect to design, performance, and lessons learned. This study employed a critical review for addressing the limitations. There were four EE models designed with different restoration interventions for stabilizing EMCs. The models using active interventions have not been cost-effective in controlling erosion because the interventions failed to achieve their goals or were costly and unnecessary. Of the two passive intervention models, the one with structures constructed from onshore proved to be more cost-effective in terms of construction costs, the survival rate of transplanted seedlings, and levels of sea mud accumulation. Interventions with adequate consideration of the muddy coastal ecological processes and the ecological reasoning for the positioning of these interventions play a crucial role in stabilizing EMCs. A passive restoration model using gradually expanded interventions should be promoted in order to ensure sustainable management of EMCs in the future. Citation: Tien, H.V.; Tuan Anh, N.; Keywords: active restoration; muddy coasts; passive restoration; sea mud accumulation; transplantation Tan Phong, N.; Minh Nhut, M.L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Method and Model of Ecological Technology Evaluation
    sustainability Article The Method and Model of Ecological Technology Evaluation Xiaoning Hu 1, Meizi Si 2, Han Luo 3 , Mancai Guo 1,* and Jijun Wang 3 1 College of Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China; [email protected] 2 College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China; [email protected] 3 Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China; [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (J.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-029-8709-2298 Received: 11 January 2019; Accepted: 5 February 2019; Published: 8 February 2019 Abstract: In order to evaluate ecological technology scientifically, we constructed a modular “three-stage evaluation method” based on qualitative evaluation, semiquantitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation, and established the theoretical models of the four kinds of ecotechnology, such as soil and water conservation technology, desertification governance technology, rocky desertification governance technology and ecological restoration technology. We gave the quantification criteria of the first-level and second-level index commonly shared by four kinds of ecotechnology and defined the quantification criteria of the third-level index of reflecting the heterogeneity of soil and water conservation technology. An ecotechnology evaluation model combining Analytic Hierarchy Process and Logistic regression was established based on soil and water conservation technology. The rationality of the evaluation method and model were verified by field investigation data of soil and water conservation technology in Gaoxigou. The evaluation method and model could provide scientific basis for the effective introduction and popularization of ecotechnology.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives of Forest Biodiversity Conservation in Northeast India
    ioprospe , B cti ity ng rs a e n iv d d Tripathi et al., J Biodivers Biopros Dev 2016, 3:2 D o i e v B e f DOI: 10.4172/2376-0214.1000157 l Journal of Biodiversity, Bioprospecting o o l p a m n r e n u t o J ISSN: 2376-0214 and Development ResearchReview Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Perspectives of Forest Biodiversity Conservation in Northeast India Shri Kant Tripathi1*, Arijit Roy2, Deepak Kushwaha2, Fanai Lalnunmawia1, Lalnundanga1, Hnialum Lalraminghlova3, Chalthleng Lalnunzira1 and Parth Sarathi Roy4 1Department of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl, Mizoram, India 2Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 3Department of Environmental Science, Mizoram University, Aizawl, India 4University Center of Earth and Space Science, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Abstract Forests are major repositories of biodiversity and provide essential goods and services for humanity. Biodiversity loss is a major threat to forest ecosystem and emerging as a great challenge to humanity. Estimation of biodiversity or biological richness of a region is a difficult task that is an impossible goal without technological inputs. The Northeast India, part of Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot, is one of the still relatively undisturbed regions of the world harbouring almost 50% of the flowering plant of the Indian subcontinent. This region is economically less developed and forests are under tremendous pressure from the anthropogenic influences mainly due to the local traditional shifting (jhum) cultivation practices. This article aims to bring an overview on current state of forest biodiversity and its conservation strategies in the Northeast India including traditional knowledge of conservation in this region.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Ecological Engineering
    Journal of Ecological Engineering Received: 2019.08.30 Revised: 2019.09.27 Volume 20, Issue 10, November 2019, pages 217–224 Accepted: 2019.10.18 Available online: 2019.10.30 https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/113538 Ecological Engineering – a View on Tasks and Challenges Joanna Kostecka1 1 Department of Biological Foundations of Agriculture and Environmental Education, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, M. Ćwiklińskiej 1A, 25-601 Rzeszów e-mail: [email protected] “The world does not need more successful people anymore. Planet Earth desperately needs more people of peace, healers, restorers, storytellers and lovers of all kinds, needs people to live well, needs people with moral courage to make the effort to create a more humane and friendly world for its inhabitants, and these values have little to do with the success in the sense in which it is defined by modern civilization.“ ~ David W. Orr, writer, ecologist activist, scientist, academic professor ABSTRACT The following elaboration presents a view on the tasks and challenges which should be faced by ecological engi- neering in the near future. The study also emphasizes the need to disseminate the concept of retarding the pace of transformation of ecosystems and natural resources as well as proper understanding and urgent implementation of strategically correct provisions from the existing legal acts. It also refers to the need to look for the effective methods of disseminating the activities for the protection of ecosystems, in which accepting the concept of “violence on the environment” may be helpful. The ecological engineering activity may be divided into: a) activities in natural areas, including rural ones, to protect and restore their ecosystem services, b) activities in increasingly biologically poorer urbanized and industrialized areas in order to create the conditions for the well-being of residents, in the reality of climate change and the prevention of further rapid change in the region, intensified by anthropogenic pressure, c) involvement in education.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Engineering for Controlling Water Pollution in Latin America
    Ecological engineering for controlling water pollution in Latin America M.E. Hernández1 1Red de Manejo Biotecnológico de Recursos, Instituto de Ecología, A.C. México. Abstract Ecological engineering is a discipline that combines ecology and engineering to design, construct, restore and manage ecosystems. The design of constructed wetlands (CWs) and anaerobic digesters (ADs) are two applications of ecological engineering to control water pollution. CWs are inspired in the ability of natural wetland ecosystems to improve water quality; they are low cost systems that do not require fossil fuels inputs. ADs are closed systems without oxygen in which a sludge or liquid is degraded by the action of anaerobic bacteria, improving water quality and producing biogas. In Latin American countries there is a great need of low-cost and maintenance wastewater technologies that take advantage of the climatic conditions and biodiversity in the region. Conventional wastewater treatment are maintenance and energy intensive, consequently, their performance in the region have not been adequate. Ecological engineered systems such as CWs and ADs has a great potential to be developed in the region. However, ecological engineering as discipline lack of identity and presence in Latin American universities and research centers. Despite of the small development of ecological engineering in the region, CWs and ADs to improve water quality has been applied in the last 20 years. The majority of these systems have been guided and funded by ecological engineer groups from developed countries. It is concluded that ecological engineered systems are the best option to control water pollution in Latin America and it is necessary the development ecological engineering discipline in the universities and research centres of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • B11504973.Pdf
    http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4919.html We ship printed books within 1 business day; personal PDFs are available immediately. Engineering Within Ecological Constraints Peter Schulze, Editor; National Academy of Engineering ISBN: 0-309-59647-5, 224 pages, 6 x 9, (1996) This PDF is available from the National Academies Press at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4919.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online for free • Explore our innovative research tools – try the “Research Dashboard” now! • Sign up to be notified when new books are published • Purchase printed books and selected PDF files Thank you for downloading this PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department toll- free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to [email protected]. This book plus thousands more are available at http://www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF File are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Distribution, posting, or copying is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. Request reprint permission for this book. i e h t be ion. om r ibut f r t cannot r at not o f EnginEngineeringeeringEngineering WithinWithinWithin however, version ng, i t paper book, at ive EcolEcologicalogicalEcological ConstraintsConstraintsConstraints at rm o riginal horit ic f o e h t he aut t om r as ing-specif t ion ed f Edited by Peter C.
    [Show full text]