Final Audit 2014 Front Cover
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Supporting Document for Proposed Local Development Plan 2015 East Dunbartonshire Evidence Report 2: Housing Land Audit 2014 Strategic Environmental Assessment: Environment Report Action Programme Habitats Regulations Appraisal Equality Impact Assessment Policy Background Reports Evidence Report 1: Addressing Housing Need and Demand in East Dunbartonshire Evidence Report 2: Housing Land Audit 2014 Evidence Report 3: Site Assessments Evidence Report 4: Campsie Fells Statement of Importance Evidence Report 5: Kilpatrick Hills Statement of Importance Evidence Report 6: Retail Capacity Assessment Evidence Report 7: Wind Energy Framework EAST DUNBARTONSHIRE HOUSING LAND AUDIT 2014 East Dunbartonshire Council – Housing Land Audit Base date: 31 March 2014 CONTENTS Page 3 Introduction Page 3 Definitions Page 6 Programming Methodology Page 8 Summary Tables Established Housing Supply: 31 March 2014 Effective Housing Supply: 31 March 2014 Historic Established and Effective Land Supply: 1996/97 – 2013/14 Programmed Output: 2014/15 – 2021 Past Completions: 1996/97 – 2013/14 Page 13 Schedules – 31st March 2014 Private Housing Sites Under Construction (Commitments) Private Housing Consents Private Housing Sites with Residential Potential Affordable Housing Sites Under Construction (Commitments) Affordable Housing Consents Affordable Housing Sites with Residential Potential Page 23 Maps Director of Development & Regeneration 2 INTRODUCTION Tenure This document contains information about all sites currently Private Sector – Dwellings built for owner occupation or identified as having housing potential for four or more units market rent. within East Dunbartonshire. Intermediate - This includes dwellings built for sale, shared Summary tables provide information on the total land supply ownership or shared equity by the Council or Registered in East Dunbartonshire and the programming of sites until Social Landlords and former rented stock refurbished for sale 2021. or shared ownership. A series of Schedules provide detail on a site by site basis. Affordable – Dwellings built for rent by or for Registered Social Sites are listed by tenure and planning status (see below for Landlords including Housing Associations and East definitions). The Schedules contain standardised information Dunbartonshire Council. used by authorities within the Glasgow and Clyde Valley Strategic Development Plan area. Tenure Not Specified – Dwellings where the tenure is not yet known. It should be noted that the inclusion of sites in the schedule does not necessarily infer site availability and only contact Planning Status with individual owners may ascertain this. Furthermore, if planning permission does not already exist for a particular The Planning Status categories used are as follows: site, inclusion in the register does not pre-empt any decision of the Council in relation to the principle of housing Commitments – Sites under construction at 31 March 2014. development. Consents – Sites with outline or detailed planning permission The Housing Land Audit is still subject to on-going at 31 March 2014. discussions with Homes for Scotland and therefore remains in draft form until full agreement has been reached. With Residential Potential – This category includes a wide variety of sites not covered by the above categories, for DEFINITION OF TENURE AND PLANNING STATUS example sites: • allocated for housing in draft, final or adopted Local This Schedule is divided into ‘Tenure’ sections, and each Plans; tenure is further divided by ‘Planning Status’. The Tenure • zoned for housing in inherited development plans; categories are as follows: • being promoted for housing; or, • identified as having residential potential by the Council. 3 DESCRIPTION OF SCHEDULES • ALPS – Adopted Local Plan site • PROP – Proposal The following notes and definitions apply: DEV TYPE – refers to the proposed type of development: SITE REF – Unique sequential reference number for each site. Larger sites which have been split into a number of • NB-BU – New build on a brownfield urban site (for smaller sites (e.g. separate phases within a site, mixed tenure example, redevelopment of land within the urban area developments, conversion and new build, greenfield and or a vacant or derelict infill site within the urban area). brownfield) have the suffix ‘A’, ‘B’, etc. • NB-BNU – New build on a brownfield non-urban site (for example, redevelopment of land outwith the urban GRID REF – Ordnance Survey grid reference. area or a vacant or derelict infill site outwith the urban area). ADDRESS – This is in two parts; firstly the name of the • NB-GU – New build on a greenfield urban site (for settlement or area, and secondly the specific address of the example, a site within the urban area which has never site. previously been developed or used for an urban use). • NB-GNU – New build on a greenfield non-urban site BUILDER – Refers to the developer of the site (if known); if (for example, a site outwith the urban area which has the site is being developed as individual plots this will be never previously been developed or used for an urban shown as ‘PLOTS’. use). • CONV-U – Conversion of an existing building within the OWNER – Owner of site if known. This field is used in urban area for housing. particular to indicate ownership of sites by public bodies. • CONV-NU – Conversion of an existing building outwith the urban area for housing. SITE SIZE – Gross size of site in hectares. ELS (Established Land Supply) – An entry in this field shows CAPACITY – The total capacity of the site expressed as that the site is part of the Established Land Supply. The year number of dwellings. This may be an estimate if no detailed indicates that the site has been continuously considered part layout has been approved. of the Established Land Supply since then. STATUS – This reflects the planning status of the site as EFF (Effective Land Supply) – An entry in this field shows that defined above. The codes used are: the site is part of the Effective Land Supply i.e. that development is anticipated from the site over the next seven • COMM – Commitment (Under Construction) • CONS – Consent 4 years. The year indicates that the site has been continuously PROGRAMMING – Anticipated completions, by year, over the considered part of the Effective Land Supply since that date. next seven years. CONSENT – Indicates the type of planning consent (if TOTAL 14-21 – Total programmed output for the next seven relevant): years. • DETL – Detailed consent POST 2021 – Indicates the residual capacity not included in • OUTL – Outline consent the total programmed output. The main reason for capacity being included in the Post 2021 column are: SPGR – Indicates where a site was identified as part of a Structure Plan Greenfield Release. The date refers to the • the site may have a long lead-in time, or a slow Structure Plan publication year. development rate, so that only part can be programmed within the next seven years; BUILT – Indicates the number of dwellings built and occupied • the site may be part of a major development area each year over the previous 7 years. Developments which which is phased, with not all phases producing output have been under construction for longer than this will have the during the next seven years; or, sum of earlier completions in the pre 2006 column. • the site may suffer from acknowledged constraints which preclude development during the next seven APPLICATION DETAILS – For sites with planning consent, years despite the site continuing to have residential the application number, decision and date of the decision are potential. These sites are considered to be non- given. effective. TOTAL BUILT – Refers to the total number of dwellings built and occupied as at 31 March 2014. REM.CAP. – The remaining capacity of the site, i.e. dwellings not yet started, under construction or complete but not yet occupied at 31 March 2014. The remaining fields were originally only relevant to sites in the private sector housing sites in the Established Land Supply in order to assess the ‘effective’ land supply. The methodology used in programming these sites is described below: 5 PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY Ownership – the site is in the ownership or control of a party which can be expected to develop it or to release it for Introduction development. Where a site is in the ownership of a local authority or other public body, it should be included only The methodology used to identify both the established land where it is part of a programme of land disposal; supply and the effective land supply generally accords with the approach in Planning Advise Note (PAN) 2/2010: Physical – the site, or relevant part of it, is free from Affordable Housing and Housing Land Audits. constraints related to slope, aspect, flood risk, ground stability or vehicular access which would preclude its development. Established Land Supply Where there is a solid commitment to removing the constraints in time to allow development in the period under All housing sites with a total capacity of four or more dwellings consideration, or the market is strong enough to fund the collectively make up the established land supply (ELS). This remedial work required, the site should be included in the comprises the remaining capacity of sites under construction; effective land supply; sites with planning consent; sites in adopted Local Plans; and where appropriate, other buildings and land with agreed Contamination – previous use has not resulted in potential for housing development. contamination of the site or, if it has, commitments have been made which would allow it to be developed to provide Effective Land Supply marketable housing; PAN2/2010 states that “to assess a site or a portion of a site Deficit Funding – any public funding required to make as being effective, it must be demonstrated that within the 5- residential development economically viable is committed by year period beyond the date of the audit the site can be the public bodies concerned; developed for housing (i.e. residential units can be completed and available for occupation), and will be free of Marketability – the site, or a relevant part of it, can be constraints…” .