DNA Repair: Rad52 — the Means to an End Kevin Hiom

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DNA Repair: Rad52 — the Means to an End Kevin Hiom CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector R446 Dispatch DNA repair: Rad52 — the means to an end Kevin Hiom In eukaryotic organisms, double-strand breaks in in its damaged homologous partner. Our understanding of chromosomal DNA are repaired either by this process has been greatly enhanced by reconstitution non-homologous end-joining, or by homologous of the strand-exchange reaction in vitro using purified recombination. How do cells choose which pathway components [3]. In eukaryotic organisms, strand-exchange to use? is carried out by the Rad51 protein, a homologue of the bacterial RecA recombinase. In vitro, however, strand- Address: MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK. exchange mediated by Rad51 alone is very inefficient [3]. Current Biology 1999, 9:R446–R448 More recently, experiments have shown that this in vitro http://biomednet.com/elecref/09609822009R0446 strand-exchange reaction can be stimulated in the © Elsevier Science Ltd ISSN 0960-9822 presence of another recombination protein, Rad52 [4–6]. Rad52 has been shown to stimulate annealing of comple- Double-strand breaks in chromosomal DNA can arise as a mentary regions of single-stranded DNA, and is therefore consequence of exposure to harmful exogenous agents, thought to assist Rad51 in the initial pairing of homolo- such as ionising radiation or cytotoxic molecules, or as a gous DNA molecules [4–6]. Genetic studies found that result of errors in cellular processes, such as DNA replica- yeast rad52 mutants exhibit extensive degradation of tion. Double-strand breaks are also generated as normal DNA ends compared with wild type [7], raising the possi- intermediates in V(D)J recombination, the process by bility that the Rad52 protein might also have a role in the which the genes encoding the antigen receptor molecules initial processing of DNA breaks. Now, van Dyck et al. [2] of lymphocytes are assembled from multiple coding have shown that Rad52 does indeed act at the earliest sequences [1]. Double-strand breaks pose a considerable stage of homologous DNA repair, playing a key part in the threat to genomic integrity and cell survival; if left unre- recognition and binding of double-strand breaks. paired, a single double-strand break is sufficient to cause cell death. Moreover, inefficient or inappropriate repair To investigate the interactions between human Rad52 can generate potentially oncogenic chromosomal aberra- (hRad52) and DNA, van Dyck et al. [2] used electron tions such as translocations. microscopy to directly visualize protein–DNA complexes. They observed that, in binding to the ends of linear DNA, To overcome the lethal potential of double-strand breaks, hRad52 exhibited a clear preference for DNA ends with eukaryotic organisms have evolved two major pathways for single-stranded tails. Tailed molecules of this kind are repairing these lesions. One pathway is known as non- likely to be common in cells that have been damaged by homologous end-joining and involves the direct joining of exposure to ionising radiation, as newly formed double- the broken DNA ends. Repair by this pathway is not nec- strand breaks are very quickly resected by exonucleases essarily error-free, however, as small deletions in the DNA such as the Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 (Xrs2) complex. Once sequence are often introduced at the site of the double- bound to a DNA end, however, Rad52 protects the end strand break. The second pathway, in contrast, uses an from further degradation by exonucleases. van Dyck et al. undamaged copy of a chromosome as a template to repair [2] also found that hRad52 promoted the association of DNA breaks in a way that restores the genetic information DNA ends, mediated through hRad52–hRad52 intermole- lost at the break site. This high-fidelity repair mechanism cular interactions. They further determined that these is known as homologous recombination. What, then, deter- end-to-end interactions facilitated the joining of DNA mines whether a cell repairs a double-strand break by non- ends by T4 DNA ligase. While it is unlikely that the stim- homologous end-joining or by homologous recombination? ulation of end-ligation has any direct role in homologous New work from West and colleagues [2] suggests that the recombination, the preference of hRad52 for DNA ends choice between homologous recombination and non- with single-stranded tails, and the promotion of end-to- homologous end-joining might be determined by a compe- end interactions, are clearly consistent with a role in tition between different DNA-end-binding proteins, homologous pairing. which direct the repair of breaks into alternative pathways. The properties observed for Rad52 are strikingly similar to A key process in homologous recombination is the pairing those previously described for the Ku protein (reviewed in and strand-exchange between homologous DNA mole- [8]). Ku is a heterodimer of two proteins, Ku70 and Ku80, cules. It is this reaction which donates an undamaged and plays a critical part in non-homologous end-joining DNA template that is used to repair a double-strand break [8]. Mammalian cells that lack either Ku70 or Ku80 are Dispatch R447 Figure 1 A model for the initiation of double-strand break repair. DNA damage — by ionising radiation, cytotoxic drugs or errors of cellular processes — generates double-stranded DNA damage/ breaks in chromosomal DNA. Initially, these processing breaks may be resected by the action of cellular exonucleases, generating DNA ends Rad52 binding Ku binding with single-stranded tails. DNA ends can be bound either by Rad52 or by Ku. Binding of Rad52 (left) initiates repair of the break by homologous recombination; binding by Ku (right) directs repair by non-homologous end- Recruitment of Rad51 Recruitment of joining. It is proposed that Rad52 promotes DNA-PK homologous recombination by assisting in the pairing of homologous DNAs and also by Strand exchange recruiting Rad51 to the site of the DNA break, where it can initiate strand-exchange. Ku facilitates non-homologous end-joining by Trimming, ligation promoting the association of DNA ends and also by recruiting other repair factors such as DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). In this diagram, Rad52 is represented by the red circles, Rad51 by the yellow ellipses, Ku by Homologous recombination Non-homologous end-joining the blue circles and DNA-dependent protein kinase by the orange ellipses. Current Biology deficient in non-homologous end-joining and exhibit synchronised human cells has shown that hRad52 is extreme sensitivity to ionising radiation. Like Rad52, Ku present only at very low levels during the G1 phase of the binds selectively to DNA ends, protects these ends from cell cycle, when recombinational repair is absent, but that digestion by exonucleases and promotes DNA end- its level rises steadily through S phase, reaching a joining. On the basis of these similarities, van Dyck et al. maximum in G2 phase when homologous repair is also at [2] have suggested a model for the initiation of double- its highest level [10]. strand break repair in which Ku and Rad52 have analogous roles in non-homologous end-joining and homologous By employing competing but overlapping repair pathways, recombination, respectively. In this model (Figure 1), eukaryotic cells ensure a level of redundancy for double- double-strand breaks are bound either by Ku or by Rad52. strand break repair, which has benefits to the cell. This While binding of Ku directs double-strand breaks into can be seen clearly by comparing repair of double-strand repair by non-homologous end-joining, binding of Rad52 breaks in G1/early S phase with that in late S/G2 phase of initiates repair by homologous recombination. Hence, the the mammalian cell cycle [9]. As previously mentioned, choice of repair pathway for double-strand breaks may G1 cells repair double-strand breaks by non-homologous well be determined by a competition between Rad52 and end-joining; loss of this pathway, for example by inactiva- Ku for binding DNA ends. tion of Ku, renders the G1 cell defenceless against double- strand breaks and extremely sensitive to DNA damage by The outcome of this competition is likely to be influ- ionising radiation. In S/G2-phase cells, where double- enced by a number of factors, such as the relative abun- strand breaks can be repaired either by non-homologous dance of hRad52 and Ku in a cell, and the different end-joining or by homologous recombination, the loss of affinities of these proteins for binding DNA ends. either repair pathway alone leads to only a mild sensitivity Although nothing is currently known about the relative to ionising radiation. This suggests that, in this phase of affinities of Rad52 and Ku for DNA ends, there is a corre- the cell cycle, one repair pathway is able to compensate lation between the levels of Rad52 protein and repair by for loss of the other. homologous recombination. In mammalian cells, repair of double-strand breaks during the G1 and early S phase of Although both non-homologous end-joining and homolo- the cell cycle occurs almost exclusively by non-homolo- gous recombination have been conserved in evolution from gous end-joining. In late S and early G2 phase, however, yeast to man, the relative contribution of each pathway to after cells have replicated an extra copy of the genome, the overall repair of breaks differs between ‘lower’ and homologous recombination operates in addition to non- ‘higher’ organisms. Whereas in yeast repair of double- homologous end-joining [9]. Analysis of protein levels in strand breaks occurs largely by homologous recombination, R448 Current Biology, Vol 9 No 12 mammalian cells predominantly use non-homologous end- 5. New JH, Sugiyama T, Zaitseva E, Kowalczykowski SC: Rad52 protein stimulates DNA strand exchange by Rad51 and replication joining.
Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Role of Rad52 in Homologous Recombination for Therapeutic Advancement
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on October 15, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3150 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. The Role of Rad52 in Homologous Recombination MOLECULAR PATHWAYS: Understanding the role of Rad52 in homologous recombination for therapeutic advancement Benjamin H. Lok 1,2 and Simon N. Powell 1 1 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 2 New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY Corresponding author: Simon N. Powell, MD PhD Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY Mailing address: 1250 1st Avenue, Box 33, New York, NY 10065 Telephone: 212-639-6072 Facsimile: 212-794-3188 E-mail: [email protected] Conflicts of interest. The authors have no potential conflict of interest to report. 1 Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 26, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on October 15, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3150 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. The Role of Rad52 in Homologous Recombination Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mutations in the RAD54 Recombination Gene in Primary Cancers
    Oncogene (1999) 18, 3427 ± 3430 ã 1999 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0950 ± 9232/99 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/onc SHORT REPORT Mutations in the RAD54 recombination gene in primary cancers Masahiro Matsuda1,4, Kiyoshi Miyagawa*,1,2, Mamoru Takahashi2,4, Toshikatsu Fukuda1,4, Tsuyoshi Kataoka4, Toshimasa Asahara4, Hiroki Inui5, Masahiro Watatani5, Masayuki Yasutomi5, Nanao Kamada3, Kiyohiko Dohi4 and Kenji Kamiya2 1Department of Molecular Pathology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Hiroshima 734, Japan; 2Department of Developmental Biology and Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Hiroshima 734, Japan; 3Department of Cancer Cytogenetics, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Hiroshima 734, Japan; 42nd Department of Surgery, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734, Japan; 51st Department of Surgery, Kinki University School of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka 589, Japan Association of a recombinational repair protein RAD51 therefore, probable that members of the RAD52 with tumor suppressors BRCA1 and BRCA2 suggests epistasis group are altered in cancer. that defects in homologous recombination are responsible To investigate whether RAD54, a member of the for tumor formation. Also recent ®ndings that a protein RAD52 epistasis group, is mutated in human cancer, associated with the MRE11/RAD50 repair complex is we performed SSCP analysis and direct sequencing of mutated in Nijmegen breakage syndrome characterized PCR products using mRNAs from 132 unselected by increased cancer incidence and ionizing radiation primary tumors including 95 breast cancers, 13 sensitivity strongly support this idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Chang-2017-03-23-DNA-Repair-1.Pdf
    DNA Repair 54 (2017) 1–7 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect DNA Repair journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dnarepair Short communication Increased genome instability is not accompanied by sensitivity to DNA damaging agents in aged yeast cells MARK Daniele Novarina, Sara N. Mavrova1, Georges E. Janssens2, Irina L. Rempel, ⁎ Liesbeth M. Veenhoff, Michael Chang European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae divides asymmetrically, producing a new daughter cell from the Rad52 original mother cell. While daughter cells are born with a full lifespan, a mother cell ages with each cell division Genome stability and can only generate on average 25 daughter cells before dying. Aged yeast cells exhibit genomic instability, Yeast aging which is also a hallmark of human aging. However, it is unclear how this genomic instability contributes to DNA damage sensitivity aging. To shed light on this issue, we investigated endogenous DNA damage in S. cerevisiae during replicative aging and tested for age-dependent sensitivity to exogenous DNA damaging agents. Using live-cell imaging in a microfluidic device, we show that aging yeast cells display an increase in spontaneous Rad52 foci, a marker of endogenous DNA damage. Strikingly, this elevated DNA damage is not accompanied by increased sensitivity of aged yeast cells to genotoxic agents nor by global changes in the proteome or transcriptome that would indicate a specific “DNA damage signature”. These results indicate that DNA repair proficiency is not compromised in aged yeast cells, suggesting that yeast replicative aging and age-associated genomic instability is likely not a consequence of an inability to repair DNA damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Table 1: Snps Genotyped for NCO, Listed Alphabetically by Gene Name
    Supplemental Table 1: SNPs genotyped for NCO, listed alphabetically by gene name. Gene Name SNP rs# ACVR1 rs10497189 ACVR1 rs10497191 ACVR1 rs10497192 ACVR1 rs10933441 ACVR1 rs1146035 ACVR1 rs1220110 ACVR1 rs17182166 ACVR1 rs17798043 ACVR1 rs4380178 ACVR1 rs6719924 ACVR2 rs1128919 ACVR2 rs10497025 ACVR2 rs1424941 ACVR2 rs1424954 ACVR2 rs17742573 ACVR2 rs2382112 ACVR2 rs4419186 AKT2 rs11671439 AKT2 rs12460555 AKT2 rs16974157 AKT2 rs2304188 AKT2 rs3730050 AKT2 rs7250897 AKT2 rs7254617 AKT2 rs874269 ALOX12B/ALOXE3 rs3809881 ALOX15B rs4792147 ALOX15B rs9898751 AMH rs10407022 AMH rs2074860 AMH rs3746158 AMH rs4806834 AMH rs757595 AMH rs886363 AMHR2 rs10876451 AMHR2 rs11170547 AMHR2 rs11170558 APC rs2229992 APC rs351771 APC rs41115 APC rs42427 APC rs459552 APC rs465899 APEX1 rs2275007 APEX1 rs3136820 15 APEX1 rs938883 APEX1 rs11160711 APEX1 rs1713459 APEX1 rs1713460 APEX1 rs1760941 APEX1 rs2275008 APEX1 rs3120073 APEX1 rs4465523 AR rs12011793 AR rs1204038 AR rs1337080 AR rs1337082 AR rs2207040 AR rs2361634 AR rs5031002 AR rs6152 AR rs962458 ATM rs1800058 ATM rs1800889 ATM rs11212570 ATM rs17503908 ATM rs227060 ATM rs228606 ATM rs3092991 ATM rs4987876 ATM rs4987886 ATM rs4987923 ATM rs4988023 ATM rs611646 ATM rs639923 ATM rs672655 ATR rs2229032 ATR rs10804682 ATR rs11920625 ATR rs13065800 ATR rs13085998 ATR rs13091637 ATR rs1802904 ATR rs6805118 ATR rs9856772 BACH1 rs388707 BACH1 rs1153276 BACH1 rs1153280 BACH1 rs1153284 BACH1 rs1153285 BACH1 rs17743655 BACH1 rs17744121 BACH1 rs2300301 BACH1 rs2832283 16 BACH1 rs411697 BACH1 rs425989 BARD1 rs1048108
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Repair by Rad52 Liquid Droplets
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14546-z OPEN DNA repair by Rad52 liquid droplets Roxanne Oshidari 1, Richard Huang1, Maryam Medghalchi1,2, Elizabeth Y.W. Tse3, Nasser Ashgriz2, Hyun O. Lee3,4, Haley Wyatt3,4 & Karim Mekhail 1,4* Cellular processes are influenced by liquid phase separation, but its role in DNA repair is unclear. Here, we show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, liquid droplets made up of DNA repair proteins cooperate with different types of DNA damage-inducible intranuclear microtubule filaments (DIMs) to promote the clustering of DNA damage sites and maintain 1234567890():,; genome stability. Rad52 DNA repair proteins at different DNA damage sites assemble in liquid droplets that fuse into a repair centre droplet via the action of petite DIMs (pti-DIMs). This larger droplet concentrates tubulin and projects short aster-like DIMs (aster-DIMs), which tether the repair centre to longer DIMs mediating the mobilization of damaged DNA to the nuclear periphery for repair. Our findings indicate that cooperation between Rad52 liquid droplets and various types of nuclear filaments promotes the assembly and function of the DNA repair centre. 1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, MaRS Centre, 661 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada. 2 Multiphase Flow and Phase Systems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King’s College Circle, M5S 3G8 Toronto, ON, Canada. 3 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, MaRS Centre, 661 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada. 4 Canada Research Chairs Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King’s College Circle, M5S 1A8 Toronto, ON, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Expression Profiling in Werner Syndrome Closely Resembles That of Normal Aging
    Gene expression profiling in Werner syndrome closely resembles that of normal aging Kasper J. Kyng*†, Alfred May*, Steen Kølvraa‡, and Vilhelm A. Bohr*§ *Laboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224; and ‡Department of Human Genetics, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark Edited by Philip C. Hanawalt, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved August 19, 2003 (received for review February 6, 2003) Werner syndrome (WS) is a premature aging disorder, displaying We used cDNA microarrays to study expression of 6,912 RNA defects in DNA replication, recombination, repair, and transcrip- pol II transcribed genes in a panel of 15 primary human tion. It has been hypothesized that several WS phenotypes are fibroblast cell lines derived from normal young donors, normal secondary consequences of aberrant gene expression and that a old donors, and WS patients. transcription defect may be crucial to the development of the syndrome. We used cDNA microarrays to characterize the expres- Materials and Methods sion of 6,912 genes and ESTs across a panel of 15 primary human Cell Lines and Culture Conditions. Fifteen primary human skin fibroblast cell lines derived from young donors, old donors, and WS fibroblast cell lines were obtained from Coriell Cell Repositories patients. Of the analyzed genes, 6.3% displayed significant differ- (Camden, NJ) and classified into three groups based on geno- ences in expression when either WS or old donor cells were type as listed in Table 1: normal young (avg. 22.5 yr, n ϭ 6), compared with young donor cells. This result demonstrates that normal old (avg.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Annealing by Rad52 Protein Is Stimulated by Specific Interaction with the Complex of Replication Protein a and Single-Stranded DNA
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 6049–6054, May 1998 Biochemistry DNA annealing by Rad52 Protein is stimulated by specific interaction with the complex of replication protein A and single-stranded DNA TOMOHIKO SUGIYAMA,JAMES H. NEW, AND STEPHEN C. KOWALCZYKOWSKI* Sections of Microbiology and of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8665 Communicated by I. Robert Lehman, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, March 30, 1998 (received for review January 2, 1998) ABSTRACT Homologous recombination in Saccharomy- otides (14, 15). More recent reports show that Rad52 protein ces cerevisiae depends critically on RAD52 function. In vitro, stimulates DNA strand exchange mediated by Rad51 protein, Rad52 protein preferentially binds single-stranded DNA which is a homologue of the E. coli RecA protein (16–19). In (ssDNA), mediates annealing of complementary ssDNA, and the yeast system, stimulation is due to Rad52 protein interac- stimulates Rad51 protein-mediated DNA strand exchange. tion with, and alleviation of an inhibitory consequence of Replication protein A (RPA) is a ssDNA-binding protein that ssDNA binding by, replication protein A (RPA), which is the is also crucial to the recombination process. Herein we report homologue of ssDNA binding protein (SSB) protein (16–18). that Rad52 protein effects the annealing of RPA–ssDNA RPA is a heterotrimeric complex consisting of polypeptides complexes, complexes that are otherwise unable to anneal. with molecular masses of 70.4, 29.9, and 13.8 kDa (20, 21). The The ability of Rad52 protein to promote annealing depends on primary structure of RPA is well-conserved in yeast, human, both the type of ssDNA substrate and ssDNA binding protein.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Competition Between Homologous Recombination and Non-Homologous End Joining
    Vol. 1, 913–920, October 2003 Molecular Cancer Research 913 Interactive Competition Between Homologous Recombination and Non-Homologous End Joining Chris Allen,1 James Halbrook,2 and Jac A. Nickoloff1 1Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, and 2ICOS Corporation, Bothell, WA Abstract distinct, non-conservative HR process that can result in DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), composed of deletions when interacting regions are arranged as direct Ku70, Ku80, and the catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), is repeats (1). Key HR proteins include RAD51, five RAD51 involved in double-strand break (DSB) repair by non- paralogues, RAD52, and RAD54 (2–8). Several other proteins homologous end joining (NHEJ). DNA-PKcs defects have poorly defined roles in HR, including replication protein confer ionizing radiation sensitivity and increase A (RPA), p53, ATM, BRCA1, and BRCA2 (9–14). In yeast, homologous recombination (HR). Increased HR is con- Rad50 and Mre11 have been implicated in HR, particularly in sistent with passive shunting of DSBs from NHEJ to HR. an early step involving end processing to 3V single-stranded tails We therefore predicted that inhibiting the DNA-PKcs (15). HR typically results in accurate repair, while defects in kinase would increase HR. A novel DNA-PKcs inhibitor HR proteins cause genome instability (6, 16–18). (1-(2-hydroxy-4-morpholin-4-yl-phenyl)-ethanone; desig- NHEJ often results in imprecise repair, yielding deletions or nated IC86621) increased ionizing radiation sensitivity insertions, yet NHEJ also plays a role in maintaining genome but surprisingly decreased spontaneous and DSB- stability (19, 20).
    [Show full text]
  • Mutational Signatures Reveal the Role of RAD52 in P53-Independent P21 Driven Genomic Instability
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/195263; this version posted September 28, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Mutational signatures reveal the role of RAD52 in p53-independent p21 driven genomic instability Panagiotis Galanos1,2*, George Pappas1,2*, Alexander Polyzos3, Athanassios Kotsinas1, Ioanna Svolaki1, Nikos N Giakoumakis4, Christina Glytsou5, Ioannis S Pateras1, Umakanta Swain6, Vassilis Souliotis7, Alexander Georgakilas8, Nicholas Geacintov9, Luca Scorrano5, Claudia Lukas10, Jiri Lukas10, Zvi Livneh6, Zoi Lygerou4, Claus Storgaard Sørensen11, Jiri Bartek2,12,13**, Vassilis G. Gorgoulis1,3,14** 1. Molecular Carcinogenesis Group, Department of Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias Str, Athens, GR-11527, Greece. 2. Danish Cancer Society Research Centre, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark. 3. Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Ephessiou Str, Athens, GR-11527, Greece. 4. Laboratory of Biology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26505, Rio, Patras, Greece 5. Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova 35121, Italy 6. Dept. of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel 7. Institute of Biology, Medicinal Chemistry and Biotechnology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 48 Vassileos Constantinou Ave, Athens, GR-11635, Greece 8. Physics Department, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Zografou 15780, Athens, Greece bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/195263; this version posted September 28, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder.
    [Show full text]
  • RNA Expression of DNA Damage Response Genes in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Influence on Outcome and Response to Adjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article RNA Expression of DNA Damage Response Genes in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Influence on Outcome and Response to Adjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy Jonas Herrmann 1,* , Helena Schmidt 1, Katja Nitschke 1, Cleo-Aron Weis 2, Philipp Nuhn 1, Jost von Hardenberg 1, Maurice Stephan Michel 1, Philipp Erben 1 and Thomas Stefan Worst 1 1 Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; [email protected] (H.S.); [email protected] (K.N.); [email protected] (P.N.); [email protected] (J.v.H.); [email protected] (M.S.M.); [email protected] (P.E.); [email protected] (T.S.W.) 2 Institute for Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-621-383-2201 Abstract: Background: Perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CBC) can improve the outcome of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but it is still to be defined which patients benefit. Mutations in DNA damage response genes (DDRG) can predict the response to CBC. The value of DDRG expression as a marker of CBC treatment effect remains unclear. Material and Citation: Herrmann, J.; Schmidt, H.; methods: RNA expression of the nine key DDRG (BCL2, BRCA1, BRCA2, ERCC2, ERCC6, FOXM1, Nitschke, K.; Weis, C.-A.; Nuhn, P.; RAD50, RAD51, and RAD52) was assessed by qRT-PCR in a cohort of 61 MICB patients (median age von Hardenberg, J.; Michel, M.S.; 66 y, 48 males, 13 females) who underwent radical cystectomy in a tertiary care center.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhibition of RAD52-Based DNA Repair for Cancer Therapy
    University of Nebraska Medical Center DigitalCommons@UNMC Theses & Dissertations Graduate Studies Spring 5-5-2018 Inhibition of RAD52-based DNA repair for cancer therapy Mona Al-Mugotir University of Nebraska Medical Center Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/etd Part of the Biochemistry Commons, and the Molecular Biology Commons Recommended Citation Al-Mugotir, Mona, "Inhibition of RAD52-based DNA repair for cancer therapy" (2018). Theses & Dissertations. 286. https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/etd/286 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@UNMC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNMC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Inhibition of RAD52-based DNA repair for cancer therapy By Mona Hadi Al-Mugotir A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the University of Nebraska Graduate College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Graduate Program Under the Supervision of Professor Gloria E. O. Borgstahl University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska April, 2018 Supervisory Committee: Amarnath Natarajan, Ph.D. Justin L. Mott, M.D.- Ph.D. Youri I. Pavlov, Ph.D. Acknowledgment Any line I could think of to start my acknowledgment contains the phrase “my mother.” My mother has a generous, giving nature that drove her since early times in her life to assume motherhood responsibilities towards her younger siblings which continued in full capacity as she became a parent herself for the eight surviving of us. Not a single time in my life growing up do I recall her going to a bakery to buy bread.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Validation of Rare Human Genetic Variants Involved in Homologous Recombination Using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Functional Validation of Rare Human Genetic Variants Involved in Homologous Recombination Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae Min-Soo Lee1,MiYu1, Kyoung-Yeon Kim2, Geun-Hee Park1, KyuBum Kwack2*, Keun P. Kim1* 1 Department of Life Science, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea, 2 Department of Biomedical Science, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea * [email protected] (KPK); [email protected] (KBK) Abstract Systems for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are necessary to maintain ge- OPEN ACCESS nome integrity and normal functionality of cells in all organisms. Homologous recombination Citation: Lee M-S, Yu M, Kim K-Y, Park G-H, Kwack (HR) plays an important role in repairing accidental and programmed DSBs in mitotic and K, Kim KP (2015) Functional Validation of Rare meiotic cells, respectively. Failure to repair these DSBs causes genome instability and can Human Genetic Variants Involved in Homologous induce tumorigenesis. Rad51 and Rad52 are two key proteins in homologous pairing and Recombination Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. strand exchange during DSB-induced HR; both are highly conserved in eukaryotes. In this PLoS ONE 10(5): e0124152. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0124152 study, we analyzed pathogenic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in human RAD51 and RAD52 using the Polymorphism Phenotyping (PolyPhen) and Sorting Intolerant from Academic Editor: Alvaro Galli, CNR, ITALY Tolerant (SIFT) algorithms and observed the effect of mutations in highly conserved do- Received: July 25, 2014 mains of RAD51 and RAD52 on DNA damage repair in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based Accepted: March 10, 2015 system. We identified a number of rad51 and rad52 alleles that exhibited severe DNA repair Published: May 4, 2015 defects.
    [Show full text]