2) ($67(5 . Chris Ans Revel in Joy Over the Good News Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2) ($67(5 . Chris Ans Revel in Joy Over the Good News Of Parish Office: 952R473R6601 Parish Fax: 952R473R0980 Email: [email protected] Website: www.stRbarts.org School Office: 952R473R6189 630 E. Wayzata Blvd. | Wayzata, MN 55391 School Fax: 952R745R4598 JOYFUL EASTER NEWS JESUS ABIDES WITH US IN THE EUCHARIST The Glad Tidings of Easter with a Bit of Apprehension. Chrisans revel in joy over the Good News of the Resurrecon during the Easter season, but there is an underlying cause for worry. The Ascension is celebrated on the Seventh Sunday of Easter, and with the Ascension, the physical presence of Jesus in bodily form and audible voice is over. With Jesus no longer in Nazareth, Capernaum, or Jerusalem, and with Jesus no longer speaking in the synagogues, on the hillside, or along the seashore, where is the presence of Jesus to be found? Reassurances of the Abiding Presence of Jesus. On the Second Sunday of Easter there is a horizontal thread that connects the first readings from the Acts of the Apostles for Years A, B, and C that highlights how Jesus connues to be present in the community of believers. On the Third Sunday of Easter there is another horizontal thread, this me in the gospels of Years A, B, and C, that highlights how Jesus connues to be present in the Eucharist. The Third Sunday of Easter, Year A (Lk 24:13R35). On Easter Sunday a ernoon Jesus appeared to Cleopas and another disciple as they walked to Emmaus. That evening they ate together, and Jesus “took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them” (Lk 24:30), and as they shared the breaking of the bread they recognized that it was Jesus and experienced his special presence with them. Jesus had performed this Eucharisc acon twice before, first when he fed the five thousand (Lk 9:16), and then, most importantly, at the Last Supper The Eucharist (Lk 22:14R20), when Jesus added, “This is my body, which will be given for you; do St. Pius X Catholic Church this in memory of me” (Lk 22:19b). Jesus was present to the five thousand, the Onida, SD twelve apostles, and Cleopas and another disciple, and Jesus is present to us in the breaking of the bread. The Third Sunday of Easter, Year B (Lk 24:35R48). The allusion to the Eucharist is more subtle, but it is intenonal and significant. When Jesus appeared to the disciples in Jerusalem on Easter Sunday night, Jesus tried to reassure them that it was actually him present by showing them his hands and his feet. To further reassure them he decided to eat something in front of them, and “they gave him a piece of baked fish” (Lk 24:42). The food choice is no accident. It could have been figs, dates, olives, cheese, or lamb, all very common foods, but it was fish. The menon of fish comes immediately a er the menon of bread in the Emmaus encounter previously (Lk 24:30). The other fish meal in the gospel of Luke is the feeding of the five thousand when Jesus mulplied two fish (Lk 9:13,16). Jesus was present when he ate fish in front of his disciples, and Jesus Fish, Jesus’ Easter Sunday night dinner is present when we share his Eucharisc meal. Light of Christ Catholic Church, Clearwater, FL The Third Sunday of Easter, Year C (Jn 21:1R19). The risen Jesus appeared to his disciples along the Sea of Tiberias. They had been fishing all night and caught nothing, but then made a miraculous catch. Once they hauled their nets ashore they found Jesus standing near a charcoal fire “with fish on it and bread” (Jn 21:9b). Then “Jesus came over and took the bread and gave it to them, and in like manner the fish” (Jn 21:13). Jesus was personally present to the disciples as they ate their meal with him, a Eucharisc acon prefigured when Jesus fed a large crowd with five loaves and two fish (Jn 6:1R 13). On Holy Thursday night Jesus ancipated his physical departure so he promised his disciples, “I will not leave you orphans” (Jn 14:18), and he fulfills his promise through his ongoing presence in the breaking of the bread, the Eucharist. I have given you a model to follow, so that as I have done for you, 2 FR. MIKE VAN SLOUNAO you should also do. John 13:15 APRIL 21, SAINT ANSELM, Bishop and Doctor of the Church St. Anselm was born in 1033 in Aosta in Piedmont, Italy. His father strictly controlled the family home. When Anselm was fi een he wanted to join the Benedicne monastery in Aosta, but his father refused to allow it, so when Anselm turned twentyRthree he le home, traveled across the Alps, and went to Burgundy, France, where he went to study. In 1059 he became a friend of Lanfranc, the prior of the Benedicne abbey in Bec, Normandy, and he became a Benedicne monk there in 1060. Anselm made rapid progress in the spiritual life, and he taught theology to his fellow students. Three years later Lanfranc was elected abbot of another abbey and Anselm replaced him as prior. Anselm developed a reputaon as an excellent preacher, he did much to reform monasc life, and he was greatly loved by his fellow monks. He was consecrated abbot of the Bec Abbey in 1078, and he maintained close contact with his mentor Lanfranc who had become Archbishop of Canterbury. Lanfranc died in 1089, and in 1092 the English clergy, who had come to know Anselm because of his visits to England to care for Benedicne property there, elected Anselm as his successor. Anselm insisted on the spiritual independence of the diocese and would not tolerate government interference, and as a result King William II refused to confirm his elecon. Anselm moved to Canterbury in 1093, and the conflict with King William II escalated. The king demanded a large payment for his nominaon as bishop, which he refused to pay, and would not allow him to convene synods. King William demanded that Pope Urban I remove Anselm, and he threatened to confiscate church property if he did not do so. Anselm was exiled in 1097. He went to Cluny, Lyons, and then to Rome, where he tendered his resignaon. Pope Urban I reaffirmed his confidence in Anselm, ordered King William to permit his return, and insisted that all confiscated monies and properes be given back. Before Anselm’s return to England, Urban asked Anselm to aend Saint Anselm the Council of Bari (1098) where he effecvely defended Filioque, the Church’s Our Lady and the English Martyrs doctrine of the double procession of the Holy Spirit from both the Father and Cambridge, England the Son. Photo by: Fr. Lawrence Lew, O.P. Anselm returned to England in 1100. King Henry I had assumed the throne a er William’s death, and another round of disputes began. Henry insisted on the lay investure of bishops and abbots. Anselm refused. Henry threatened further confiscaon of church revenue and property and sent Anselm into exile in 1103. Again, he returned to Rome. The new Pope, Paschal II, fully backed Anselm and refused to accede to Henry’s demands. When Anselm did return, the archbishop and the king reached a concordat: the king would no longer seek to invest bishops and the church would pay tribute to the king in the temporal realm. Anselm is remembered as a brilliant theologian and philosopher, and he is regarded as the Father of WEEKLY READINGS Scholascism. He is responsible for the definion of theology, “fides quaerens intellectum,” “faith seeking Readings for the week of April 18, 2021 understanding.” He is the author of a number of major Sunday: Acts 3:13R15, 17R19/Ps 4:2, 4, 7R8, 9 [7a]/1 Jn 2:1R5a/ works: Monologium, metaphysical proofs on the existence Lk 24:35R48 of God; Proslogion, “Allocuon,” on the aributes of God; Monday: Acts 6:8R15/Ps 119:23R24, 26R27, 29R30 [1ab]/Jn 6:22R29 Cur Deus Homo, “Why God Became Man,” a reflecon on Tuesday: Acts 7:51V8:1a/Ps 31:3cdR4, 6 and 7b and 8a, 17 and 21ab the Incarnaon; as well as De fide Trinitas, De conceptu [6a]/Jn 6:30R35 virginali, De veritate, and Liber apologecus pro insipiente. Wednesday: Acts 8:1bR8/Ps 66:1R3a, 4R5, 6R7a [1]/Jn 6:35R40 Thursday: Acts 8:26R40/Ps 66:8R9, 16R17, 20 [1]/Jn 6:44R51 St. Anselm died on April 21, 1109, in Canterbury, England, Friday: Acts 9:1R20/Ps 117:1bc, 2 [Mk 16:15]/Jn 6:52R59 and was declared a Doctor of the Church in 1734. His symbol Saturday: Acts 9:31R42/Ps 116:12R13, 14R15, 16R17 [12]/Jn 6:60R69 is a ship sailing over open water which represents spiritual Next Sunday: Acts 4:8R12/Ps 118:1, 8R9, 21R23, 26, 28, 29 [22]/ independence from government interference. 1 Jn 3:1R2/Jn 10:11R18 3 JOIN US FOR MASS ATTEND LIMITED PUBLIC MASS Weekday Mass: Tues., Wed., Thurs., Fri.: 8:00 a.m. Saturdays: 5:00 p.m. Sundays: 8:30 & 10:30 a.m. For all Public Masses: Masks are required. Learn more at stRbarts.org/aendpublicmass ATTEND VIRTUAL MASS Weekend Mass is available Saturdays by 5:00 p.m. stRbarts.org/viewmass STEWARDSHIP “Jesus himself stood among them and said to them, ‘Peace be with you.’ But they were startled and frightened…” R LUKE 24:36R37 Throughout the day we have many opportunies to “see the face of Jesus” in others and to “be the face of Jesus” to others.
Recommended publications
  • Anselm of Canterbury
    Anselm of Canterbury From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search For entities named after Saint Anselm, see Saint Anselm's. Anselm of Canterbury Archbishop of Canterbury Province Canterbury Diocese Diocese of Canterbury See Archbishop of Canterbury Appointed 1093 Reign ended 21 April 1109 Predecessor Lanfranc Successor Ralph d'Escures Other posts Abbot of Bec Orders Consecration 4 December 1093 Personal details Birth name Anselmo d'Aosta c. 1033 Born Aosta, Kingdom of Burgundy 21 April 1109 (aged 75) Died Canterbury, Kent, England Buried Canterbury Cathedral Denomination Roman Catholic Gundulf de Candia Parents Ermenberga of Geneva Sainthood Feast day 21 April Portrayed with a ship, representing Attributes the spiritual independence of the Church. Anselm of Canterbury (Aosta c. 1033 – Canterbury 21 April 1109), also called of Aosta for his birthplace, and of Bec for his home monastery, was a Benedictine monk, a philosopher, and a prelate of the Church who held the office of Archbishop of Canterbury from 1093 to 1109. Called the founder of scholasticism, he is famous as the originator of the ontological argument for the existence of God. Born into the House of Candia, he entered the Benedictine order at the Abbey of Bec at the age of 27, where he became abbot in 1079. He became Archbishop of Canterbury under William II of England, and was exiled from England from 1097 to 1100, and again from 1105 to 1107 under Henry I of England as a result of the investiture controversy, the most significant conflict between Church and state in Medieval Europe. Anselm was proclaimed a Doctor of the Church in 1720 by a Papal Bull of Pope Clement XI.
    [Show full text]
  • Abelard, See Peter Accountability, See Charters, Individual, Seals Adelaide
    INDEX Abelard, see Peter Arras, Bishop of, see Lambert Accountability, see Charters, Individual, Ars dictaminis, 209, 212, 235, see Aurea Seals Gemma, Konrad of Mure Adelaide of Maurienne, queen of Augustine, bishop of Hippo, 143, 163, France, 92 175, 194, 240, 243 Adele of Champagne, queen of France, Doctrine of image, 177, 178, 179, 180, xvi, 93, pl. XVII 181, 186, 193 Administration, 43 Sign Theory, 3, 5, 63, 106, 121–123, Aimery le Viaudre of Issy, xiv, pl. XI 124, 125, 126, 127, 147, 163, 177 Alan, duke of Brittany, xv, pl. XII Authentication, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 156, Alan of Lille, 183, 184, 187, 190, 191 202, 204 Alaric II, king of the Visigoths, 76 Authenticity, 4, 12, 15–16, 27, 31, 32, 34, Alberic of Reims, 118, 119, 124, 158 35, 37, 38, 83, 98, 109, 131, 157, 201, Alienor of Braines, xi, xiv, pl. I, VIII, see 203, 205, 255 Robert of Braines Aurea Gemma, 209, 235, 236 Amiens, Authenticum, 38 Bishops of, 50, 51, 52, 90, 95, 99, 106, Authority, 31, 32–33, 38, 43, 50, 53, 54, 119, 132; see Guy, Thierry 55, 57, 60, 75, 88, 89, 109, 110, 120, Chancellors of, 119 131, 135, 137, 139, 156, 157, 199, 201, City, 249 203, 205, 221, 246, 255 Anaclet II, Pope and anti-Pope, 211, Episcopal, 96, 98, 101, 107, 141 213, 214, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 223, Royal, 75, 76, 81, 88, 89, 93, 94 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229 Anjou, 21, 23 Baldwin of Canterbury, see Baldwin of Counts of, see Fulk Rechin, Geoffrey Ford Anne of Kiev, queen of France, xii, Baldwin, count of Flanders, 91 pl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Loss of Normandy and the Invention of Terre Normannorum, 1204
    The loss of Normandy and the invention of Terre Normannorum, 1204 Article Accepted Version Moore, A. K. (2010) The loss of Normandy and the invention of Terre Normannorum, 1204. English Historical Review, 125 (516). pp. 1071-1109. ISSN 0013-8266 doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ceq273 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/16623/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ceq273 Publisher: Oxford University Press All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online 1 The Loss of Normandy and the Invention of Terre Normannorum, 1204 This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in English Historical Review following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [T. K. Moore, „The Loss of Normandy and the Invention of Terre Normannorum, 1204‟, English Historical Review (2010) CXXV (516): 1071-1109. doi: 10.1093/ehr/ceq273] is available online at: http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/content/CXXV/516/1071.full.pdf+html Dr. Tony K. Moore, ICMA Centre, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6BA; [email protected] 2 Abstract The conquest of Normandy by Philip Augustus of France effectively ended the „Anglo-Norman‟ realm created in 1066, forcing cross-Channel landholders to choose between their English and their Norman estates.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Reasons to Rendez-Vous with Normandy in 2014
    Top Reasons to Rendez‐Vous With Normandy in 2014 Normandy is easily accessible by plane, train or by road The region is just a two hour drive from Paris and its airports, Roissy‐Charles de Gaulle and Orly and many of the main cities are only one hour away by train. Whether visitors plan a dedicated trip to a particular site or wish to travel throughout the whole region, Normandy remains the ideal destination with a mixture of France’s best countryside, heritage, culture, food and entertainment. Home to world famous sites: The Mont‐Saint‐Michel, the D‐Day Beaches, the Bayeux Tapestry, the Rouen Cathedral and Claude Monet’s Garden in Giverny. And also UNESCO World Heritage Sites not to be missed: The Mont‐Saint‐Michel, rightly called "The Wonder of the Western World,” is an international place of pilgrimage as well as a major tourist center. Le Havre was the first city in Europe to be added to the UNESCO World Heritage List in the 1900s. The "City of the Dukes," Alençon, owes its international fame to its UNESCO‐listed "Alençon needle‐point lace" The Vauban Tower on Tatihou Island The medieval town of Bayeux, with its cobbled streets, many restaurants and museums, is also home to the world famous Bayeux Tapestry listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Normandy is the cradle of Impressionism Inspired by the unique light, the beauty and the mystery of Normandy, Impressionist painters set up their easels along the Channel coast and the banks of the Seine, in Rouen's Old Town and Monet's private gardens in Giverny.
    [Show full text]
  • Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury, 1109 April 21, 2021 by the Reverend Stephen Gerth Romans 5:1–11; Psalm 139:1–9; Matthew 5:16; Matthew 11:25–30
    Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury, 1109 April 21, 2021 By the Reverend Stephen Gerth Romans 5:1–11; Psalm 139:1–9; Matthew 5:16; Matthew 11:25–30 Today we commemorate Anselm, a Benedictine monk who became archbishop of Canterbury on the fourth of December in 1093. He served until his death on April 21 in 1109. I first crossed paths with Anselm as an undergraduate major in philosophy. I do not remember the name of the course in which we studied the philosophical arguments for the existence of God, but I remember well our teacher, Cora Diamond. She is now a retired professor emerita at the University of Virginia. Though for a century or more, I think it is correct to say that most philosophers have not been people of faith. We were studying Anselm in the Department of Philosophy because Anselm is credited with conceiving the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God—from the Greek “onta”—things which exist. It begins with the proposition of God as “something than which nothing greater”— “or better”—“can be conceived.”1 A not entirely dissimilar argument dates from Plato, Aristotle, and Thomas Aquinas, the Cosmological Argument. It begins with the fact that there is a creation. Therefore, there must be a Creator.2 If I recall correctly, both arguments are not considered logically satisfactory. I no longer remember the details of these arguments, but insight from Anselm has remained with me. He wrote, “I do not seek to understand that I may believe, but I believe in order that I may understand.
    [Show full text]
  • Tosny Family Estates
    1 Tosny Family Estates. Tosny1 Family Estates in Normandy c.1172 The Tosny family’s accumulation of properties in Normandy began, of course, with the estate and ville of Tosny itself, which was given by Hugues de Calvacamp, Archbishop of Rouen (942-989), to his brother Raoul(i) de Tosny. However, the lands which Archbishop Hugues alienated from the cathedral and archdiocese of Rouen included more than just Tosny. It is also very difficult to differentiate these former church lands from those obtained by the family from other sources. By 1172, the family’s possessions included those that are shown in the following maps and table. As can be seen, a number of them are considered to have come from the archbishop.2 In the table below these are marked with a . ESTATE J. Moore, DPhil thesis. 1 Acquigny ✟ ♜ Ⓑ ☧ XXX XXX “+” ® 2 Amfreville-la-Campagne ✟ ○ XXX (XXX) 3 Anceins ☧ 4 Bailieul (Saint-Pierre) ● XXX “x” 5 Berniers-sur-Seine ● XXX XXX “x” 6 Blainville-Cleron ● 7 Bourlier XXX “x” 8 Buisson-Vernet ® 9 Burey ● XXX XXX “x” 10 Cailly-sur-Eure ○ XXX XXX “+” 11 Carneville ● 12 Chanteloup ● XXX XXX “x” 13 Clères ● 1 Tosny is a name which has ancient roots - its correct pronunciation is “Tôny.” This has produced various spellings of the name through history by scribes who have heard these old pronunciations and made up their own spelling on the basis of what they heard, e.g. Tonei, Tony, Toney. 2 Musset, L., ‘Aux origines d’une classe dirigeante: les Tosny, grands barons normands du Xe au XIIIe siècles’, Francia, 5 (1978), 45-80, 70-73.
    [Show full text]
  • PENURIA NOMINUM and LANGUAGE RECTITUDO. LINGUISTIC ECONOMY in SAINT ANSELM of CANTERBURY Riccardo Fedriga – Roberto Limonta
    PENURIA NOMINUM AND LANGUAGE RECTITUDO. LINGUISTIC ECONOMY IN SAINT ANSELM OF CANTERBURY Riccardo Fedriga – Roberto Limonta The role that language holds in Anselm’s thought can hardly be underestimated, for what concerns both his philosophical and logical arguments (as in De gram- matico, De veritate and Cur Deus Homo) and his more strictly theological re- flections (in theMonologion and Proslogion above all). Indeed, it may be argued that the crux of Anselm’s thought precisely resides in the intimate tie between language analysis and Trinitarian theology, so that it is not possible to elucidate one without elucidating the other, and vice-versa. In the light of Anselm’s con- ception of language, therefore, we shall advance an analysis of the term pauper- tas and all its semantic ramifications, showing how the term and the concept it conveys stand at the core of a theoretical construction that organically and seamlessly connects logical-linguistical terms (e.g. cogitatio vocum and cogitatio rerum, significatio per seand per aliud), theological and philosophical principles (such as Verbum, intima locutio and veritas), and monastic values that belong to the ethical, social and political context, such as silence and rectitudo. 1. PAUPERTAS AND TACITURNITAS: THE LANGUAGE OF THINGS If we consider the occurrences of the terms belonging to the semantic area of paupertas in Anselm’s work (paupertas, pauper, paupero), we see that they con- stantly oscillate between two extremes. On the one hand, we have paupertas in its more commonly understood sense: that expressed in the formula “pauper est anima mea”, which indicates a condition of poverty; its opposite is represented by the dives, the rich person who owns much.
    [Show full text]
  • Lanfranc's Reforms
    LANFRANC’S REFORMS Area of Reform Key Term Definition Church hierarchy The system was centralised. Each level was answerable to the one above. Eg. bishops report to archbishops. Introduced archdeacons (appointed by bishops) and deans. Archdeacon Appointed by the bishop to be Bishops Anglo-Saxon bishops were replaced by Normans, by 1070 there was only 1 Anglo-Saxon in charge of churches in a shire bishop left. Archbishop Stigand was replaced by Lanfranc. Bishop Senior member of the church Priests Most Anglo-Saxon priests kept their jobs, but marriage was banned. The number of village churches doubled between 1070 and 1170. Celibacy Not having sex or getting Architecture Churches and cathedrals were rebuilt in the Romanesque style. New cathedrals were married built in Rochester, Durham, Norwich, Bath, Winchester and Gloucester. Clergy Religious leaders/people with Synods These were church councils that helped spread the message of reform. Bishops held religious duties their own councils twice a year to improve their authority over their diocese. Dean Below an archdeacon. In charge Legal issues Only the church courts could try the clergy. They were often given softer sentences of churches in the hundred. than people who did not work for the church. Diocese An area under the control of the bishop Nepotism Giving church positions to family/friends In Lanfranc’s early career he was an Italian Benedictine monk and abbot of Bec Abbey in France. In 1066 he went Anselm became the Archbishop of Pluralism Having more than one church to Rome to obtain a papal banner for William before the Canterbury in 1093 during the reign of position invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • War for the English Throne Houston Area Model United Nations
    Houston Area Model United Nations Crisis Committee War for the English Throne The Duchy of Normandy Triple Joint Crisis Committee Houston Area Model United Nations 46 January 21-22, 2021 Hello Delegates, Welcome to the 46th Houston Area Model United Nations Conference! The war for the English Throne, which took place in 1066 was the cumulation of conflicts, which occurred after the Vikings came into contact with continental Europe and England. Here each one of will have a chance to participate in events that took place just before the swords were crossed. The three main participants will be the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of England, and The Duchy of Normandy, along with some of their respective allies. The Kingdom of Norway is Directed by, Omama Ahmed, who is a current freshman at Lonestar college with plans to transfer to New York university. She is intending to study public health and has been a delegate in her high school Model UN in the past three years. She has always loved the program and was thrilled when given the opportunity to be a part of the crisis committees. She’s very excited to be working with two great Crisis directors for her first year and cannot wait to see how the conference goes. The Duchy of Normandy is directed by, Joel Varghese who is a sophomore currently attending Texas A&M University at College Station, studying Industrial Engineering. He has been a part of Model UN, since his sophomore year at high school and he plans on pursuing this passion until he graduates college.
    [Show full text]
  • Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, 1066-1154
    :CD ;00 100 •OJ !oo CjD oo /!^ REGESTA WILLELMI CONQUESTORIS ET WILLELMI RUFI 1066-1100 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON EDINBURGH GLASGOW NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE BOMBAY HUMPHREY MILFORD M.A. PUBHSHER TO THE UNIVERSITY REGESTA REGUM ANGLO -NORMANNORUM 1066-1154 VOLUME I REGESTA WILLELMI CONQUESTORIS ET WILLELMI RUFI 1066-1100 EDITED VVITH INTRODUCTIONS NOTES AND INDEXES BY H. W. C. DAVIS, M.A. FELLOW AND TUTOR OF BALLIOL COLLEGE, OXFORD SOiAIETIME FELLOW OF ALL SOULS COLLEGE WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF R J. WHITWELL, B.Litt. OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS M UCCCC XIII 190 J)37 Y.l PREFACE This is the first of three volumes covering the period of the Anglo-Norman kings (1066-1154). The second and third volumes are far advanced, and will shortly be in the press. The object of ^ the series is to give a calendar, chronologically arranged and the of critically annotated, of the royal acts of period, and some cognate documents which are valuable for the historian. The first care of the editor has been to call attention to materials which iUustrate the development of law and institutions. But the interests of the genealogist and the topographer have not been neglected. Pains have been taken to record the names of persons, and the more important names of places, which are mentioned in the docu- ments. The collection includes charters issued in and for Normandy. Norman archives have not been searched for the purpose, since the Norman material is being coUected by Professor Haskins. But it seemed advisable to calendar such Norman charters as have been or are to be found in for of printed EngUsh manuscripts ; many these charters throw useful sideUghts upon EngUsh history.
    [Show full text]
  • Excursions 1979 N. Scarfe
    EXCURSIONS 1979 Reportand notesonsomefindings 5 May Stokeby Clare,StokeCollege,began temp. Ed. Confessor at Glare, collegiate church of John the Baptist, richest Suffolk church in Domesday Book, with 3,000 acres. Given to Bec a bbey in 1090 and became regular Benedictine priory : as such, moved to Stoke 1124, presumed date of Norman core of surviving, apparently cruciform, remains of priory church. Reconstituted a college 1415, operating with dean, 6 canons, 8 vicars, etc., by 1423 (V.C.H. II , 145-6), presumed date of main destruction and conversion of Romanesque building. Last dean, Matthew Parker, spent crucial 12 years of Reformation mainly here till college dissolved 1548. Inventories 1534 and 1548 in Proc.Suff. Inst. Arch., XVII,1921, 21-77 (hints on plan and arrangement of church, 46-49). 1547, Edward VI sold college to his tutor, John Cheke, Greek scholar and Reformer. Exposed massive groundfloor carved ceiling-beams probably this period. Under Elwes family, here temp. Charles II —Victoria, fine balustered staircase and 2 panelled rooms Queen Anne or early Georgian —the period when the house (now a private school) took its present character. Under Lord Loch, 1897, Lutyens created present front entrance, W. court and walled garden. Freegrammarschool founded here by Parker, extinguished c. 1780 by notorious miser Elwes. Parish Church, well-endowed in Domesday Book, and with early 'stratified' stonework at S.E. corner of S. aisle (originally the S.E. corner of nave), was originally dedicated to St Augustine, one of three such very early dedi- cations in Suffolk. Late Victorians re-dedicated to John the Baptist, on mistaken assumption, still prevailing, that it seived as church to the nearby college.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lost Abbey in Medieval Senghenydd and the Transformation of the Church in South Wales
    The Problem of Pendar: a lost abbey in medieval Senghenydd and the transformation of the church in South Wales ‘A thesis submitted to the University of Wales Lampeter in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy’ 2015 Paul Anthony Watkins The Problem of Pendar: a lost abbey in medieval Senghenydd and the transformation of the church in South Wales List of figures Acknowledgements Introduction Chapter I: The Problem of the Abbey of Pendar: the documentary evidence The ‘problem’ and the historiography The Pendar charters The problem of dating Who was Brother Meilyr? Chapter II: The Problem of Pendar: the evidence of the landscape Mapping the charter The archaeology of the charter area The evidence of place names Conclusion Chapter III: The Native Lords of Glamorgan, Senghenydd and Gwynllwg The native lords of Glamorgan The Lords of Senghenydd The kingdoms of Deheubarth, Caerleon and Gwynllŵg Conclusion: Chapter IV: The Earls of Gloucester and Lands of Glamorgan Robert fitz Hamo and the establishment of Norman power in south Wales The followers of Robert fitz Hamo Robert de la Haye The family of de Londres The earls of Gloucester Robert, earl of Gloucester William, earl of Gloucester King John The de Clare earls Hugh le Despencer Conclusion Chapter V: The changes made by immigrant lordship on the church in South East Wales in the early years of the conquest The Pre-Norman church Changes made by Immigrant Lordships Tewkesbury Abbey Gloucester Abbey and its dependency at Ewenny Glastonbury Abbey The Alien Priories St Augustine’s Abbey, Bristol The church under native lordship Conclusion Conclusion Bibliography Appendices Figures and Maps I.1 Copy of Manuscript Penrice and Margam 10 supplied by the National Library of Wales.
    [Show full text]