DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ACADEMIC INSTITUTION SOUTH AFRICAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY QUALIFICATION Mini-Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Theology THESIS SUPERVISOR Dr Mark Pretorius STUDENT: #8482 Edward Cunningham Brown MINI-THESIS TITLE A Critique of the Scientific Dating Methods Used by Young Earth Creationism to Prove a Global Cataclysmic Deluge: A Case Study of the Grand Canyon’s Geology. SUBMISSION DATE: March 2017 DECLARATION By submitting this work to the South African Theological Seminary (SATS), I hereby declare that it is my own work, that no one did it for me, and that I did not plagiarise any other person’s work. I have cited all the sources such as books, journals and websites that I used. I understand and accept that should this declaration be proven false, I will automatically fail the course and be subject to disciplinary action by SATS. Please note that unless expressly indicated otherwise, all scriptural quotations are from the “The Holy Bible, New King James Version” (1995), Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville. 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to my wife, Charlene, for her unflagging encouragement over the last fifteen months, and for proof reading this document and offering suggestions as to style and grammar. And also to my son, Aiden, whose technical skill was invaluable in the setting up of the Word document parameters, and the transferring of data bases between computers when operating systems threatened to lose hundreds of resource documents. My thanks to Dr Mark Pretorius for his invaluable guidance over the last three and a half years of my journey into the deeper waters of academia. 2 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... 2 GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW OF THE PROBLEM. ....................... 7 1. A CRITIQUE OF YOUNG EARTH CREATIONISM DATING METHODS WITH RESPECT TO MODERN NATURAL SCIENCE DATING METHODS...................... 12 1.1. A Synopsis and Historical Introduction to the dating of the Earth Debate. ......... 12 1.2. An Introduction to Current Modern Dating Methods ........................................... 16 1.2.1. Fossil Remains. ........................................................................................... 16 1.2.2. Dendrochronology. ...................................................................................... 17 1.2.3. Ice-Core Chronology. .................................................................................. 19 1.2.4. Varves. ........................................................................................................ 20 1.2.5. Magnetic Mineral Orientation and Mineral-core Dating. .............................. 20 1.2.6. Coral Reef Dating. ....................................................................................... 21 1.3. An Overview of Radio-metric Dating, with Reference to its use in Geology. ...... 22 1.4. Radiocarbon Dating. .......................................................................................... 27 1.4.1. An Overview of Early and Current Radiocarbon Dating Instruments. ............. 27 1.4.2. A Simplified Explanation of the Principles behind Radiocarbon Dating. ......... 30 1.4.3. Reservoir Effects. ........................................................................................... 33 1.4.4. Poor Scientific Practices that Detract from Radiocarbon Dating’s Reliability. 37 3 1.4.5. Modern Radiocarbon Technologies and Procedures. .................................... 38 1.5. Young Earth Creationist Challenges to Carbon-14 Dating. ............................... 42 1.6. Self-Correction in the Natural Sciences. ............................................................ 43 1.7. Assessment of Current Radiocarbon Dating Technologies. .............................. 43 2. THEOLOGICAL AND BIBLICAL EXAMINATION OF THE YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST POSITION. ...................................................................................... 44 2.1. Overview of Young Earth Creationist Thought and Hermeneutical Approach. .. 44 2.2. Questions on the Authority and Reliability of Scripture as Underpinnings for Young Earth Creationist Theology............................................................................ 46 2.2.1. The Arguments for the Independence of the Genesis 1-11 passages in the Light of other Ancient Near Eastern Writings. .......................................................... 46 2.2.2. Man’s Origins in Young Earth Creationist Theology. ...................................... 48 2.3. Perspectives on the Genesis Flood Narrative ................................................... 50 2.3.1. Introduction..................................................................................................... 50 2.3.2. The World Wide Culture of Deluge Narratives. ............................................... 50 2.3.3. Some Current Perspectives on the Genesis Flood Narrative. ........................ 51 2.3.3.1. The Genesis Deluge: Universal or Localised? ............................................. 51 2.3.3.2. God’s Grace towards Noah Amidst Judgment on Sin. ................................ 52 2.3.3.3. The Deluge: Universal Judgement and death, or Specific only to Mesopotamia? .......................................................................................................... 53 2.3.3.4. An Overview of the J and P Flood Narratives Argument. ............................ 54 4 2.4. Interpreting the Ancient Scriptural Texts. .......................................................... 56 2.4.1. The Septuagint’s Perspective on the Flood Narrative. ................................... 56 2.4.2. Historical Protestant Understanding of the Flood. .......................................... 56 2.4.3. Genesis 7:11. “The Great Deep’s Fountains” and “The Windows of Heaven”. 58 2.4.4. “Mabbuwl”, God’s Divine Flood. ..................................................................... 59 2.4.5. The Depth of the Flood. .................................................................................. 59 3. THE YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST PERSPECTIVE. ....................................... 59 3.1. The Young Earth Creationist Model. ................................................................. 59 3.2. Contra Perspectives within Young Earth Creationism. ...................................... 61 3.3. Some Modern Geological Responses to the Young Earth Creationist Subterranean Water Postulate. ................................................................................ 62 3.3.1. A Vulcanological Explanation for the Waters of the “Great Deep”. ................. 64 3.4. Some Erosional and Depositional Models in Young Earth Creationist Geology.64 3.6. The Structure of the Grand Canyon. ................................................................. 70 3.6.1. The Geography, Geological Column and Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon. 70 3.6.1.1. The Geography and Formation Models for the Grand Canyon.................... 70 3.6.1.2. The Geological Column of the Grand Canyon Region. ............................... 73 3.6.2. The Igneous and Metamorphic Rocks of the Grand Canyon. ......................... 75 3.6.2.1. The Crystalline Core Rocks. ........................................................................ 75 5 3.6.2.2. The Igneous Lavas of the Grand Canyon. ................................................... 76 3.6.2.3. Volcanic Dams in the Grand Canyon. ......................................................... 78 3.6.3. The Great Unconformity. ................................................................................ 85 3.6.4. Selected Sedimentary Deposits in the Grand Canyon Geological Column. ... 87 3.6.4.1. Tonto Group: Deluge’s First Deposits? ....................................................... 87 3.6.4.2. The Redwall Limestone Fossils: “Proof” of the Deluge? .............................. 90 3.6.4.3. The Coconino Sandstone: A Study of Sediment Transport and Deposition in the Grand Canyon Region. ....................................................................................... 91 3.7. Flooding and Archaeology in the Grand Canyon. .............................................. 98 4. THE FUTURE OF YOUNG EARTH CREATIONISM: SCIENCE OR DOGMA? ... 99 4.1. An Overview of the Problem .............................................................................. 99 4.2. Poor Young Earth Scholarship Practices. ......................................................... 99 4.3. The Way Forward For Young Earth Creationism. ............................................ 101 GENERAL CONCLUSION ..................................................................................... 102 Evaluation of Young Earth Creationist Claims for a Young Grand Canyon. ........... 102 WORKS CITED ...................................................................................................... 107 WORKS CONSULTED ........................................................................................... 118 6 GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW OF THE PROBLEM. Science is always performed from one perspective or another, because prejudice, bias or inclination is inherent in our human nature. Arie Leegwater (2009) believes that for Christians, science is done from within the perspective of a relationship with God. This is particularly relevant in the discussion over the age of the Earth to the Young Earth Creationist (YEC)1 movement whose literal interpretation of the Bible guides their science. Young Earth Creationism believes,
Recommended publications
  • Catalogue for Eastern Fall Yearlings

    Catalogue for Eastern Fall Yearlings

    Hip No. Consigned by Becky Merkel, Agent 1 Justing Soldier Northern Dancer Danzig . { Pas de Nom Lost Soldier . Secretariat { Lady Winborne . { Priceless Gem Justing Soldier . Jester Dark bay/br. colt; Tri Jet . { Haze April 6, 2002 {I Demand . Intentionally (1989) { Bank Officer . { Intelligible By LOST SOLDIER (1990), 3rd Royal Lodge S. [G2]; $288,600 in NA, La. Downs H. [G3], etc.; 5 wins in UAE. Sire of 3 crops, including 2-year-olds of 2003, 5 black type winners, 53 winners, $3,249,518 in NA/US, $206,874 in Canada, including Lush Soldier ($438,416, Natalma S. [G3], etc.), Lost At Sea [G3] (to 4, 2003, $278,626). 1st dam I DEMAND, by Tri Jet. Winner at 4, $27,057. Dam of 6 foals of racing age, including a 2-year-old of 2003, five to race, 2 winners-- Fort Smith (c. by Valid Wager). Winner at 2 and 3, 2003, $53,460. Pompeo F. (c. by Goldwater). 5 wins to 3 in Panama as Goldwater’s Demand. 2nd dam BANK OFFICER, by Intentionally. 3 wins at 3 and 5, $11,507. Dam of 5 foals, 4 to race, all winners, including-- I’M A BANKER (c. by Truxton King). 9 wins, 2 to 5, $464,856, Long- fellow H. [G2], Kelso H. [G3] twice, 2nd Bernard Baruch H. [G2], Ball- antine’s Scotch Classic S. [G3], Laurel Turf Cup H. [G3], 3rd Daryl’s Joy S. [L] (SAR, $10,224), 4th Red Smith H. [G2]. Sire. I’m Important. 3 wins at 3 and 6, $37,523. Producer.
  • Demise of the Dams: the Construction, Destruction, and Legacy of Late Cenozoic Volcanism in the Western Grand Canyon

    Demise of the Dams: the Construction, Destruction, and Legacy of Late Cenozoic Volcanism in the Western Grand Canyon

    CHAPTER 7: DEMISE OF THE DAMS: THE CONSTRUCTION, DESTRUCTION, AND LEGACY OF LATE CENOZOIC VOLCANISM IN THE WESTERN GRAND CANYON "We have no difficulty as we float along, and I am able to observe the wonderful phenomena connected with this flood of lava. The canyon was doubtless filled to a height of 1,200 to 1,500 feet, perhaps by more than one flood. This would dam the water back, and in cutting through this great lava bed, a new channel has been formed, sometimes on one side, sometimes on the other . What a conflict of water and fire there must have been here! Just imagine a river of molten rock running down a river of melted snow. What a seething and boiling of waters, what clouds of steam rolled into the heavens!" John Wesley Powell, August 25, 1869 ALISHA N. CLARK INTRODUCTION Volcanic episodes have occurred periodically throughout the history of the Grand Canyon (e.g. Garber, this volume; Bennett, this volume). During certain phases of the tectonic evolution of the Grand Canyon, uplift of the Colorado Plateau lead to an extensional tectonic environment that thinned the Earth’s crust facilitating transport of magmatic material to the Earth’s surface, often along fault zones that acted as conduits for the basaltic magma generated in the mantle below (see Bennett, this volume for discussion of regional tectonics). There are three volcanic fields on the western Grand Canyon: the Grand Wash, Shivwits Plateau, and UinKaret Plateau, from west to east, respectively. The youngest of these, the UinKaret Plateau, was active during the Pleistocene (Crow et al., 2008; Dalrymple and Hamblin, 1998; Hamblin, 1994).
  • History of Quaternary Volcanism and Lava Dams in Western Grand

    History of Quaternary Volcanism and Lava Dams in Western Grand

    History of Quaternary volcanism and lava dams in western Grand Canyon based on lidar analysis, 40Ar/39Ar dating, and fi eld studies: Implications for fl ow stratigraphy, timing of volcanic events, and lava dams Ryan Crow* Karl E. Karlstrom Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA William McIntosh Lisa Peters Nelia Dunbar New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, Geochronology Laboratory, 801 Leroy Place, New Mexico Institute of Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA ABSTRACT down-canyon over 120 km. A second episode of normal fl uvial deposition at times when the volcanism, from 400 to 275 ka, was most volu- river was established on top of basalt fl ows. A synthesis of the geochronology on basalt minous along the Hurricane fault at river mile fl ows from the southern Uinkaret volcanic 187.5. This episode produced fl ow stacks that Keywords: Grand Canyon region, Uinkaret, ba- fi eld indicates that basalts erupted within and fi lled Whitmore Canyon and produced the salt fl ows, lava dams, volcanic history. fl owed into Grand Canyon during four major 215-m-high Whitmore Dam, which may have episodes: 725–475 ka, 400–275 ka, 225–150 also had a composite history. Basaltic river INTRODUCTION ka, and 150–75 ka. To extend the usefulness of gravels on top of the Whitmore remnants have these dates for understanding volcanic stra- been interpreted as “outburst-fl ood deposit” The Uinkaret volcanic fi eld in northwestern tigraphy and lava dams in western Grand but may alternatively represent periods when Arizona is a north-south–trending fi eld of cinder Canyon, we analyzed light detection and the river established itself atop the fl ows.
  • Otis R. Marston Papers: Finding Aid

    Otis R. Marston Papers: Finding Aid

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf438n99sg No online items Otis R. Marston Papers: Finding Aid Processed by The Huntington Library staff. The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © 2015 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Otis R. Marston Papers: Finding mssMarston papers 1 Aid Overview of the Collection Title: Otis R. Marston Papers Dates (inclusive): 1870-1978 Collection Number: mssMarston papers Creator: Marston, Otis R. Extent: 432 boxes54 microfilm251 volumes162 motion picture reels61 photo boxes Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: Professional and personal papers of river-runner and historian and river historian Otis R. Marston (1894-1979) and his collection of the materials on the history of Colorado River and Green River regions. Included are log books from river expeditions, journals, diaries, extensive original correspondence as well as copies of material in other repositories, manuscripts, motion pictures, still images, research notes, and printed material. Language: English. Access Collection is open to researchers with a serious interest in the subject matter of the collection by prior application through the Reader Services Department. Unlike other collections in the Huntington, an advanced degree is not a prerequisite for access The collection is open to qualified researchers. For more information, please visit the Huntington's website: www.huntington.org. Publication Rights The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities.
  • Index to River Surveys Made by The

    Index to River Surveys Made by The

    If you no lon~rer need this publication write to the Geological Survey in Washington for an official mailing label to use in returning it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • INDEX TO RIVER SURVEYS MADE BY THE I• UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND OTHER AGENCIES REVISED TO JULY 1, 1947 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 995 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. Krug, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. •Wrather, Director Water-Supply Paper 995 INDEX TO RIVER SURVEYS MADE BY THR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND OTHER AGENCIES REVISED TO JULY 1, 1947 BY _BENJAMIN E. JONES and RANDOLPH 0. HELLAND UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1948 Ji', r s'lle bv the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washinglnu 25, D. C. Pr-ice 75 cents CONTENTS Page Introduction _____________________________________________________ _ 1 Alabama---------------------------------------------------------Alaska __________________________________________________________ _ 4 4 Arizona---------------------------------------------------------­ 5 Arkansas--------------------------------------------------------­ 11 12 California--------------------------------------------------------Colorado ________________________________________________________ _ 23 Connecticut------------------------------------------------------- 30 I>elaware ________________________________________________________ _ 30 I>istrict of Columbia ______________________________________________ _ 30 Florida __________________________________________________________
  • Flood Deposits, Western Grand Canyon, Arizona

    Flood Deposits, Western Grand Canyon, Arizona

    Geochemical Discrimination of Five Pleistocene Lava-Dam Outburst- Flood Deposits, Western Grand Canyon, Arizona Cassandra R. Fenton, Robert J. Poreda,1 Barbara P. Nash,2 Robert H. Webb, and Thure E. Cerling2 U.S. Geological Survey, Tucson, Arizona 85745, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT Pleistocene basaltic lava dams and outburst-flood deposits in the western Grand Canyon, Arizona, have been correlated 3 3 by means of cosmogenic He ( Hec) ages and concentrations of SiO2,Na2O, K2O, and rare earth elements. These data indicate that basalt clasts and vitroclasts in a given outburst-flood deposit came from a common source, a lava dam. With these data, it is possible to distinguish individual dam-flood events and improve our understanding of the interrelations of volcanism and river processes. At least five lava dams on the Colorado River failed catastrophically between 100 and 525 ka; subsequent outburst floods emplaced basalt-rich deposits preserved on benches as high as 200 m above the current river and up to 53 km downstream of dam sites. Chemical data also distinguishes individual lava flows that were collectively mapped in the past as large long-lasting dam complexes. These chemical data, in combination with age constraints, increase our ability to correlate lava dams and outburst-flood deposits and increase our understanding of the longevity of lava dams. Bases of correlated lava dams and flood deposits approximate the elevation of the ancestral river during each flood event. Water surface profiles are reconstructed and can be used in future hydraulic models to estimate the magnitude of these large-scale floods.

  • Norm Nevills Norm Nevills Boatman’S Quarterly Review CRMP Update …Is Published More Or Less Quarterly by and for Grand Canyon River Guides

    boatman’s quarterly review the journal of Grand Canyon River Guides, Inc volume 17 number 1 spring 2004 Photo courtesy of Special Collections Department, J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah. Photo courtesy of Special Collections Department, J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah. NormNorm NevillsNevills CRMP Update • Prez Blurb • Protecting Ruins • GCY • GC Lava Dams Medical Control Quandries • Whale Foundation • 2004 Dam Ops Book Reviews • Historic Inscriptions • Thank Yous • One Last Buzz boatman’s quarterly review CRMP Update …is published more or less quarterly by and for Grand Canyon River Guides. he National Park Service (nps) is planning to release the Draft Environmental Impact State- Grand Canyon River Guides ment (eis) for the Colorado River Management is a nonprofit organization dedicated to T Plan (crmp) for public review and comment in May Protecting Grand Canyon 2004. The nps will seek public comment on the Draft Setting the highest standards for the river profession eis once a notice of availability has been posted in the Celebrating the unique spirit of the river community Federal Register. A schedule of public meetings will be Providing the best possible river experience announced following release of the draft. The Draft eis will analyze a full range of reasonable General Meetings are held each Spring and Fall. Our alternatives as well as a draft preferred alternative for Board of Directors Meetings are generally held the first managing recreational use on the Colorado River from Wednesday of each
  • Undamming Glen Canyon: 3

    Undamming Glen Canyon: 3

    STANFORD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW JOURNAL 122 STANFORD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 19:121] Volume 19 Number 1 January 2000 1. Losing Precious Water 173 2. Equity 176 Undamming Glen Canyon: 3. The Compact 182 Lunacy, Rationality, or Prophecy? 4. Local Implications 184 D. Power: Unharnessing the River 185 Scott K. Miller* 1. The Costs of Less Power 185 2. The Burdens of Less Power 187 I. Introduction 122 E. Recreation: Draining "The Great Recreational Resource 189 II. "The Stream of History:" The Colorado River and 1. Recreation Losses 191 Glen Canyon 124 2. Recreation Gains 191 A. The Colorado in Its Natural State 124 F. Environment: Restoring Ecosystems and B. From Dams to Dories 128 Endangered Species 195 III. The Law of the River 131 1. Endangered Species 195 A. The Colorado River Compact of 1922 132 2. Pollution 198 B. The Boulder Canyon Project Act and Hoover Dam 138 3. Contingent Environmental Concerns 202 C. The Colorado River Storage Project Act and VI. CONCLUSION 203 Glen Canyon Dam 141 D. David Brower and the Fight Against Dams I. INTRODUCTION In the Upper Basin 144 E. Glen Canyon Dam 150 At the fall meeting of Richard Ingebretsen's newly-formed Glen Canyon Institute, David Brower sat and ardently listened to the discussion about F. The Grand Canyon Dams 153 1 IV. The Modern Era of Western Water Management 157 draining Lake Powell, the reservoir created by Glen Canyon Dam.1 Two A. Renaissance of River Production 157 weeks later, on November 16, 1996, in what was the culmination of a fifty-year B.
  • Proquest Dissertations

    Proquest Dissertations

    People above scenery: The struggle over the Grand Canyon dams, 1963-1968 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Pearson, Byron Eugene, 1960- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 16:38:36 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/282716 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master UMI films the text directly fi'om the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be fi-om any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UML a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing fi-om left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
  • Tuweep-Geology.Pdf

    Tuweep-Geology.Pdf

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Grand Canyon Grand Canyon National Park Arizona The view from Toroweap Point is dramatically different, perhaps even confusing, to those familiar with the Geology of the Grand Canyon's heavily visited North and South Rim viewpoints. Instead of an almost bewildering mass of Tuweep Area temples and buttes, the Grand Canyon here is an abrupt gorge set in a broad corridor. Lava flows and conical black cinder cones stud the landscape. Given these differences, it is surprising to learn that the geological history of the Tuweep area is essentially the same as the eastern portions of the park, but carried further. Below Toroweap Point, the Colorado River has not yet cut into the Canyon's oldest rocks. They disappear 43 miles upstream at the foot of the Middle Granite Gorge, and do not reappear for another 11 miles downstream. However, the Layered Paleozoic rocks that compose the temples of the eastern Canyon are here at Tuweep. From 525 million years ago until 270 million years ago, the forerunner of today's Pacific Ocean alternately advanced and retreated from northwestern Arizona. Low-lying landscapes dominated: deltas, lagoons, swamps, shoals, and shallow seas. Since the seas advanced from the west, the Tuweep area was more likely to be under these seas. Thicker layers of marine limestone formed here, while coastal mud and sand were deposited to the east. As a result, limestone cliffs dominate the Canyon walls near Tuweep, replacing many of the terraces seen in the east. The major exception to this pattern lies in the deep red mudstones of the Hermit Shale.
  • Lava Falls Rapid in Grand Canyon: Effects of Late Holocene Debris Flows on the Colorado River

    Lava Falls Rapid in Grand Canyon: Effects of Late Holocene Debris Flows on the Colorado River

    science for a changing world Lava Falls Rapid in Grand Canyon: Effects of Late Holocene Debris Flows on the Colorado River Professional Paper 1591 U.S. Department ef the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Availability of Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey Order U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications from the Documents. Check or money order must be payable to the offices listed below. Detailed ordering instructions, along with Superintendent of Documents. Order by mail from— prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Superintendent of Documents Survey." Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Books, Maps, and Other Publications Information Periodicals By Mail Many Information Periodicals products are available through Books, maps, and other publications are available by mail the systems or formats listed below: from— Printed Products USGS Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Printed copies of the Minerals Yearbook and the Mineral Com­ Denver, CO 80225 modity Summaries can be ordered from the Superintendent of Publications include Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water- Documents, Government Printing Office (address above). Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Printed copies of Metal Industry Indicators and Mineral Indus­ Circulars, Fact Sheets, publications of general interest, single try Surveys can be ordered from the Center for Disease Control copies of permanent USGS catalogs, and topographic and and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and thematic maps. Health, Pittsburgh Research Center, P.O. Box 18070, Pitts­ burgh, PA 15236-0070. Over the Counter Mines FaxBack: Return fax service Books, maps, and other publications of the U.S.
  • River Surveys Made by the United States Geological Survey and Other Agencies

    River Surveys Made by the United States Geological Survey and Other Agencies

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Hubert Work. Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otto Smith, Director Water-Supply Paper 558 PRELIMINARY INDEX TO RIVER SURVEYS MADE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND OTHER AGENCIES BY BENJAMIN E. JONES AND RANDOLPH O. HELLAND \& WASflBNGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1926 CONTENTS Pag* Introduction _______________________________ ______________ 1 Alabama _______________________________________________ . 4 Alaska _____________________________________ 5 Arizona ________________________________________ 5 Arkansas ____________ ___________________________________ 9 California _____________ _.._______________________________ 9 Colorado__._________________________________ 16 Connecticut _____:____________________________________ 20 Delaware ________________________________________ 20 District of Columbia_____________________________ 20? Florida_____________________________________ 20* Georgia .___ ____________________________ 2P Hawaii______________c._________.____.___ 2$ Idaho_-__-______________.____________ 23 Illinois_________________________________ 2& Indiana.______________________________ 30* Iowa ____________________________________ 30? Kansas_______________________________ 301 Kentucky ._____________________________ 30» Louisiana ________ ____________________________ ________ 31 Maine _____ ___________ ___________________ ____ 31 Maryland _________________________________ 35 Massachusetts _______________ _________.___________ 36 Michigan _________ _ __________ __ 37 Minnesota. ____________ ________________________