Arxiv:1911.07215V3 [Math.NT] 18 May 2021 ( √ 1 (−1 + D) If D ≡ 1 (Mod 4), 2 √ Τd = 1 2 D If D ≡ 0 (Mod 4); and Let J(·) Be the Classical J-Invariant Function
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ON LANDAU{SIEGEL ZEROS AND HEIGHTS OF SINGULAR MODULI CHRISTIAN TAFULA´ p Abstract. Let χD be the Dirichlet character associated to Q( D) where D < 0 is a fundamental discriminant. Improving Granville{Stark [7], we show that L0 1 1 (1; χ ) = height(j(τ )) − log jDj + C + o (1); L D 6 D 2 D→−∞ p 1 where τD = 2 (−δ + D) for D ≡ δ (mod 4) and j(·) is the j-invariant function with C = −1:057770 :::. Assuming the \uniform"p abc-conjecture for number fields, 5'+o(1) p we deduce that L(β; χD) 6= 0 with β ≥ 1 − log jDj where ' = (1 + 5)=2, which we improve for smooth D. 1. Introduction In 2000, Granville and Stark [7] showed that the uniform abc-conjecture for number fields (Conjecture 5.2 (iii)) implies that there are no \Siegel zeros"p for odd characters, by deducing that, under uniform abc, the class number of Q( D) satisfies p π jDj X(D) 1 (1.1) h(D) ≥ (1 + o(1)) 3 log jDj a (a;b;c) where the sum runs over the reduced binary quadratic forms Q(x; y) = ax2 +bxy+cy2 of fundamental discriminant D < 0. Comparing this lower bound to the unconditional, more traditional type of lower bound: ! p 1 + O log log jDj= log jDj π jDj X(D) 1 (1.2) h(D) = ; 1 + 2 L0 (1; χ )= log jDj 3 log jDj a L D (a;b;c) where χD is the corresponding quadratic character, one derives from uniform abc that L0 j L (1; χD)j log jDj, which is equivalent to L(s; χD) having no \Siegel zeros". Our main theorems imply a slightly more precise estimate than (1.2), and the existence of a subsequence of D's for which L0 (1; χ ) = o (log jDj). L D D→−∞ p For D < 0 we need the generator of the ring of integers of Q( D), arXiv:1911.07215v3 [math.NT] 18 May 2021 ( p 1 (−1 + D) if D ≡ 1 (mod 4); 2 p τD = 1 2 D if D ≡ 0 (mod 4); and let j(·) be the classical j-invariant function. Define the height of m=n 2 Q with (m; n) = 1 by ht(m=n) = log maxfjmj; jnjg: 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. 11M20, 11G50, 11N37. Key words and phrases. Siegel zeros, singular moduli, abc-conjecture. 1 2 CHRISTIAN TAFULA´ We will give the height function for algebraic numbers in subsection 2.3. We improve on (1.2) by using Duke's equidistribution theorem [6] (Lemma 4.2): Theorem 1.1. For fundamental discriminants D < 0, we have L0 1 1 (1.3) (1; χ ) = ht(j(τ )) − log jDj + C + o (1); L D 6 D 2 D→−∞ where C := κ1 − κ2 + κ3 + γ − log 2 = −1:057770 :::, and γ = 0:577215 ::: is Euler{Mascheroni's constant.1 In particular, this implies that ! p 1 + O 1= log jDj π jDj X(D) 1 (1.4) h(D) = : 1 + 2 L0 (1; χ )= log jDj 3 log jDj a L D (a;b;c) L0 Expressing L (1; χD) in terms of ht(j(τD)) allows us to understand L-function values using Diophantine geometry techniques: The classical abc-conjecture (the Masser{Oesterl´econjecture) states that for coprime integers a; b; c satisfying a+b = c, we have X log max jaj; jbj; jcj ≤ (1 + ") log p + O"(1); p j abc where the implied constant depends only on " > 0. Several important results in number theory follow from this statement, including \asymptotic Fermat" (see Example 5.5.2, p. 71{72 of Vojta [18]). Granville and Stark used a uniform extension of the abc-conjecture to number fields.2 The tricky part is deciding what to conjecture 1=[K:Q] about the contribution of ramified primes in this inequality: thus, if rdK := j∆K j then we study two versions, where one includes the error term O(log(rdK )) (O-weak uniformity) or o(log(rdK )) (weak uniformity), given by Conjectures 5.2 (i) and (ii), respectively. With minor modifications to the argument, we prove the following version of Granville{Stark's theorem: Theorem 1.2. Assuming the abc-conjecture for number fields with L0 • O-weak uniformity we have j L (1; χD)j log jDj. 1 L0 • weak uniformity we have lim sup log jDj L (1; χD) = 0. D→−∞ L0 1.1. Traditional approach to L (1; χD). Let %(χ) be the set of non-trivial zeros of L(s; χ), each included in the set with multiplicity. We are interested in the zeros of L(s; χ) inside the region A (1.5) RA = RA(q) := s 2 C σ ≥ 1 − ; jtj ≤ 1 : log q A for any given A 2 R≥1 with q > e .A Siegel zero is a real zero β of L(s; χ) for some A primitive quadratic χ (mod q), with β ≥ 1 − log q for some given A > 0. 1 See Lemmas 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 for the definition of κ1, κ2, κ3, respectively. 2Formulated so as to be consistent between different field extensions. ON LANDAU{SIEGEL ZEROS AND HEIGHTS OF SINGULAR MODULI 3 Theorem 1.3. For every primitive character χ (mod q) we have the bound j%(χ) \ 3A RAj e (with an absolute implicit constant), and X 1 1 1 L0 < < 1 − p log q + < (1; χ) + O(e3A): 1 − % 5 2 L %(χ)\RA An integer q is y-smooth if all its prime factors are ≤ y. Chang [1] established wide zero-free regions for such q (see subsection 3.3) so we deduce: δ Theorem 1.4. For every δ > 0 there is an Nδ > 0 such that if q > Nδ is q -smooth then the only possible element of %(χ) \RA with A 1/δ, is the potential Siegel zero β = βχ := maxfσ 2 R j L(σ; χ) = 0g. In that case 0 L 1χ=χ 1 < (1; χ) = + O(δ 2 log q): L 1 − β Theorem 1.4 implies that, for every fixed δ > 0, if D < 0 is a jDjδ-smooth fundamental discriminant then 0 L 1 (1.6) (1; χ ) ≥ −Mδ 2 log jDj L D for some M 2 R≥0 not depending on δ, provided jDj is sufficiently large. 1.2. Main corollaries. We present two results that are consequences of the theorems above. First, by combining Theorems 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 together, we deduce the following: Corollary 1.5. Assume the weak uniform abc-conjecture. As D ! −∞, the function L(s; χD) has no zeros in the real interval p 5' + o(1) 1 − ; 1 log jDj p 1+ 5 where ' := 2 , nor in the region − 1 mδ 2 + oδ(1) s 2 C σ ≥ 1 − ; jtj ≤ 1 log jDj (for some absolute constant m > 0) when D is jDjδ-smooth for given δ > 0. See subsection 3.4 for a proof. Next we give explicit upper and lower bounds on several key analytic quantities: Corollary 1.6. For negative fundamental discriminants D we have: 3 ∗ (i) p log jDj + O(1) ≤ ht(j(τD)) ≤ (1 + o(1)) 3 log jDj. 5 1 X 1 ∗ 1 (ii) p log jDj + O(1) ≤ ≤ (1 + o(1)) log jDj. 2 5 % 2 %(χD) p ! p π jDj X 1 ∗ p 1 π jDj X 1 (iii) (1 + o(1)) ≤ h(D) ≤ 5 + O 3 log jDj a log jDj 3 log jDj a (a;b;c) (a;b;c) 4 CHRISTIAN TAFULA´ ∗ where the starred inequalities \≤" are conditional on the weak uniform abc-conjecture. Moreover, if D is jDjo(1)-smooth then these starred inequalities become (asymptotic) starred equalities. If we assume the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis then we obtain log log jDj 3 these asymptotic equalities for all D, with error term a factor of O( log jDj ). This corollary follows from Theorems 1.1 and 1.2; part (ii) is obtained from (3.5), and part (iii) from (1.4). (We omit the details.) In each case the upper and lowerp bounds in Corollary 1.6 differ by an artificial multiplicative factor that is ∼ 5 arising from our proof (see Lemma 3.4 (ii)), which may be improvable. Data supports part (i) of Corollary 1.6: ht(j(τD)) 6 Figure 1. Graph of 3 log jDj for −10 ≤ D ≤ 0. The perceptible slight bias towards > 1 in Figure 1 can be analyzed by rewriting (1.3) as 0 ht(j(τ )) 2( L (1; χ ) − C + o(1)) D = 1 + L D : 3 log jDj log jDj L0 Therefore this bias towards > 1 in Figure 1 must stem from L (1; χD) − C being L0 usually positive. We verify this observation in Figure 2, by noting that L (1; χD) is usually larger than C = −1:057770 :::. Lastly, an appendix on the Hadamard factorization of L-functions following Lucia [8] is included, justifying a formula we state in section 3. Notation. Let f; g :[x0; +1) ! R+ be positive real-valued functions defined in [x0; +1) for some x0 2 R. We write f ∼ g, f = o(g), or f = O(g), if jf(x)=g(x)j goes to 1, 0, or stays bounded as x ! +1, respectively. If f = O(g), we also write f g. If f g and g f, then we write f g. 3 For example, ht(j(τD)) = 3 log jDj + O(log log jDj) assuming the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis. ON LANDAU{SIEGEL ZEROS AND HEIGHTS OF SINGULAR MODULI 5 L0 6 Figure 2.