DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix (PDF: 561KB)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix (PDF: 561KB) MAIN ACTIVITIESAPPENDIX OF UNAFEI APPENDIX MAIN STAFF OF UNAFEI Mr. Masaki Sasaki Director Mr. Haruhiko Ukawa Deputy Director Faculty Mr. Motoo Noguchi Professor Mr. Haruhiko Higuchi Professor Mr. Naoyuki Harada Professor Ms. Fumiko Akahane Professor Mr. Jun Oshino Chief of Training Division, Professor Mr. Tetsuya Sugano Chief of Research Division, Professor Mr. Toru Kawaharada Chief of Information & Library Service Division, Professor Ms. Ayako Sakonji Professor Mr. Junichi Watanabe Professor Ms. Grace Lord Linguistic Adviser Secretariat Mr. Masahiro Iida Chief of Secretariat Mr. Masato Fujiwara Co-Deputy Chief of Secretariat Mr. Koji Kobayashi Co-Deputy Chief of Secretariat Mr. Masaaki Kojitani Chief of General and Financial Affairs Section Mr. Kenichiro Koiwa Co-Chief of Training and Hostel Management Affairs Section Ms. Yoshiko Kawashima Co-Chief of Training and Hostel Management Affairs Section Mr. Hideo Takahashi Chief of International Research Affairs Section AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2009 19 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2009 2009 VISITING EXPERTS THE 141ST INTERNATIONAL SENIOR SEMINAR Mr. Kittipong Kittayarak Permanent Secretary for Justice Ministry of Justice Thailand Ms. Christine Glenn Chief Executive Parole Board of England and Wales United Kingdom Mr. Ismael Juanga Herradura Administrator Parole and Probation Division Department of Justice Philippines Mr. Bala Reddy Principal Senior State Counsel Head, State Prosecution Division Attorney-General’s Chambers Singapore THE 142ND INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE Mr. Rob Allen Director International Centre for Prison Studies King’s College, University of London United Kingdom Mr. Peter Ng Joo Hee Director of Prisons Singapore Prison Service Ministry of Home Affairs Singapore Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Hans-Jörg Albrecht Director Department of Criminal Law Max-Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Freiburg Germany THE 143RD INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE Mr. Sung-hoon Park Associate Expert UNODC Vienna Monsieur Eric Maitrepierre Director of the International and European Department, Ministry of Justice Paris France Ms. Judith B. Wish Deputy Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility Department of Justice USA 20 MAIN ACTIVITIESAPPENDIX OF UNAFEI THE FIFTH SEMINAR ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE FOR CENTRAL ASIA Ms. Olga Zudova Senior Regional Legal Adviser United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Regional Office for Central Asia THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE ON THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESPONSE TO CORRUPTION Mr. Soh Kee-hean Director Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau Singapore 21 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2009 2009 UNAFEI PARTICIPANTS THE 141ST INTERNATIONAL SENIOR SEMINAR Overseas Participants Mr. Joydeb Kumar Bhadra Additional Superintendent of Police (Training) Police Headquarters Bangladesh Ms. Boitumelo Makunga Alternative Sentencing Initiative/ Wellness Centre Attorney General’s Chambers Botswana Mr. Antonio Carlos Welter Chief Prosecutor Rio Grande do Sul Region Prosecutor’s Office Federal Public Prosecution Brazil Ms. Fay Ingrid Clarke Superintendent Guyana Prison Service Ministry of Home Affairs Guyana Ms. Renny Ariyanny Head of Legal Drafting Division Legal Bureau Attorney General’s Office Indonesia Mr. Sutrisno Lecturer Police Science College Indonesia Ms. Janet Juanita Davey Regional Director Department of Correctional Services Jamaica Mr. Jihad Abdelrahim H. Majali General Attorney and Human Rights Officer Metropolitan Regional Command Public Security Directorate Jordan Mr. Asghar Ali Superintendent Faisalabad Police Office Punjab Police Pakistan Ms. Sylvia Vaka Reu Senior Research Officer Research and Development Directorate Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary Papua New Guinea 22 MAIN ACTIVITIESAPPENDIX OF UNAFEI Mr. Victor Manuel Esteche Mendez Director of Legal Affairs Legal Advisory General Department Ministry of Justice and Labor Paraguay Mr. Carlos Vargas Merida Investigative Officer Counter Terrorism Division Peruvian National Police Peru Mr. Leo Sarte Carrillo Regional Director Region IX Parole and Probation Administration Department of Justice Philippines Mr. Jagath Abeysirigunawardena Deputy Inspector General Southern Range Sri Lanka Police Sri Lanka Mr. Jose Enrique Colman Executive Coordinator Executive Coordination Department National Bureau of Jails, Penitentiaries and Rehabilitation Centres, Uruguay Mr. Viet Quoc Nguyen Legal Expert Institute for Prosecutorial Science Supreme People’s Prosecution Office Vietnam Japanese Participants Mr. Yasuhiro Date Director General Affairs Division Chugoku Regional Parole Board Mr. Katsuo Higuchi Public Prosecutor Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office Mr. Futoshi Ichikawa Judge Tokyo District Court Mr. Manubu Nakajima Senior Planning Officer for Rehabilitation Support Mine Rehabilitation Program Center Mr. Hiroshi Nakashima Assistant Director International Affairs Division Commissioner General’s Secretariat National Police Agency Mr. Akihiro Nosaka Director General Affairs Division Chubu Regional Parole Board Mr. Atsushi Ogata Public Prosecutor Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office Hachioji Branch 23 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2009 Mr. Toru Suzuki Deputy Director Research Department Research and Training Institute of the Ministry of Justice Mr. Shigeru Takenaka Deputy Warden Classification Division Kurobane Prison THE 142ND INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE Overseas Participants Ms. Marialda Lima Justino Cruz Police Chief Civil Police of the Federal District Brasilía Brazil Ms. Aurea Francisca Rodrigues de Police Officer (Correctional Officer) Moraes Material Resource Division General Administration Department Civil Police of the Federal District Brazil Mr. Oleskyenio Enrique Florez Teacher Rincon National Police Academy Colombia National Police Colombia Mr. Jean Claude Ngoie Mutombo Assistant Prosecutor Deputy Parquet de Grande Instance Kinshasa/Gombe Democratic Republic of the Congo Ms. Marta Raquel Flores Ramirez Third Officer Guatemala Police Academy Ministerio de Gobernacion Guatemala Ms. Vanna Ladavia Lawrence Director of Training Human Resource Development Department of Correctional Services Jamaica Mr. Ben Siambango Buchane Senior Superintendent Oluno Rehabilitation Centre Prisons and Correctional Services Ministry of Safety and Security Namibia Mr. Ritendra Thapa Under Secretary Special Court of Kathmandu Supreme Court of Nepal Nepal Mr. Mahendra Nath Upadhyaya Under Secretary (Registrar) Parsa District Court, Birgunj Supreme Court of Nepal Nepal 24 MAIN ACTIVITIESAPPENDIX OF UNAFEI Mr. Salim M.A. Qawariq Director Department of Social Defence Ministry of Social Affairs Palestine Mr. Allen Maliki Correctional Officer Rove Central Prison Correctional Services Solomon Islands Mr. Ricky Iomea Principal Legal Officer, Public Prosecutor Director of Public Prosecutions Office Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs Solomon Islands Ms. Sumithra Rahubaddhe Additional Secretary Ministry of Justice and Law Reform Sri Lanka Mr. Henele Telefoni Probation Officer Youth Justice and Probation Division Ministry of Justice Tonga Observers Mr. Andy Che Leung Lam Principal Officer Rehabilitation Unit Hei Ling Chau Addiction Treatment Centre Hong Kong Mr. Kyuyeon Park Senior Inspector Pohang Correctional Institution Republic of Korea Japanese Participants Mr. Masami Goda Probation Officer Kobe Probation Office Mr. Hiroyuki Hayashi Probation Officer Tokyo Probation Office Mr. Kentaro Hirate Assistant Judge Tokyo District Court Ms. Misae Kato Probation Officer Tokyo Family Court Mr. Hiroshi Suda Public Prosecutor Chiba Public Prosecutors Office Mr. Takahiro Sumikawa Public Prosecutor Kobe Public Prosecutors Office, Himeji Branch Mr. Yuichiro Wakimoto Chief Specialist Hiroshima Juvenile Classification Home Mr. Masaya Yamamoto Chief Treatment Supervisor Osaka Prison 25 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2009 THE 143RD INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE Overseas Participants Mr. Md. Shah Abid Hossain Additional Superintendent of Police Police Headquarters Bangladesh Police Bangladesh Mr. Kangkolongo Sylvain President Muamba Appeal Court Democratic Republic of the Congo Mr. Shameem Hussain Deputy Prosecutor General Prosecutor General’s Office Maldives Ms. Gereltuya Gombojav Senior Inspection Prosecutor Inspection Department for Special Crimes Capital Prosecutor Office Mongolia Mr. Thok Prasad Shiwakoti Joint Attorney Administration & Criminal and Land Related Cases Division, Office of the Attorney General of Nepal Mr. Bishnu Prasad Upadhyaya Under Secretary Legal and Judicial Reform Program Supreme Court of Nepal Nepal Mr. Khalid Salim Fadhil Officer Investigation Royal Oman Police Oman Mr. Maher Tahseen Abederaoof Chief Prosecutor Faris International Crime, Anti-Corruption Tubas City Public Prosecution Office Palestinian National Authority Mr. Long Ta Cuu Doan Leader Prosecution Office of District 4 Ho Chi Min City Procuracy Vietnam Mr. Minh Van Le Legal Expert Department for Criminal and Administrative Legislation Ministry of Justice Vietnam Japanese Participants Mr. Kazuhiro Hosoya Public Prosecutor Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office 26 MAIN ACTIVITIESAPPENDIX OF UNAFEI Mr. Manabu Imai Senior Assistant Judge Sapporo District Court Mr. Yuki Mori Public Prosecutor Morioka District Public Prosecutors Office Ms. Miho Otake Public Prosecutor Sendai District Public Prosecutors Office Mr. Masayuki Takahashi Senior Assistant Judge Tokyo District Court 27 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2009 FIFTH SEMINAR ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE FOR CENTRAL ASIA Mr. Yerbol Ismailov Judge Collegium for Criminal Cases Kazakhstan Mr. Yeshimov Maralbek Senior Prosecutor Department of Supervision
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federalism Is Debated in Nepal More As an ‘Ism’ Than a System
    The FEDERALISM Debate in Nepal Post Peace Agreement Constitution Making in Nepal Volume II Post Peace Agreement Constitution Making in Nepal Volume II The FEDERALISM Debate in Nepal Edited by Budhi Karki Rohan Edrisinha Published by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal (SPCBN) 2014 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal (SPCBN) UNDP is the UN’s global development network, advocating for change and connecting countries to knowledge, experience and resources to help people build a better life. United Nations Development Programme UN House, Pulchowk, GPO Box: 107 Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: +977 1 5523200 Fax: +977 1 5523991, 5523986 ISBN : 978 9937 8942 1 0 © UNDP, Nepal 2014 Book Cover: The painting on the cover page art is taken from ‘A Federal Life’, a joint publication of UNDP/ SPCBN and Kathmandu University, School of Art. The publication was the culmination of an initiative in which 22 artists came together for a workshop on the concept of and debate on federalism in Nepal and then were invited to depict their perspective on the subject through art. The painting on the cover art titled ‘’Emblem” is created by Supriya Manandhar. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in the book are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP/ SPCBN. PREFACE A new Constitution for a new Nepal drafted and adopted by an elected and inclusive Constituent Assembly (CA) is a key element of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) of November 2006 that ended a decade long Maoist insurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • 49086-001: Upper Trishuli 1 Hydroelectric Power Project
    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Final Report: Appendixes (Part 1) Project Number: 49086-001 June 2018 NEP: Upper Trishuli-1 Hydropower Project Prepared by Environmental Resources Management (ERM) for the Nepal Water & Energy Development Company Pvt. Ltd. And the Asian Development Bank. The environmental and social impact assessment report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Non-Technical Updated Environmental and Social Assessment Summary Report Appendix A Upper-Trishuli Hydroelectric Power Project Environmental and Social Management System TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1 1.1. Purpose .............................................................................................................................1 1.2. Overview ..........................................................................................................................1 2. Company ESHS Policy ............................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • The Abolition of Monarchy and Constitution Making in Nepal
    THE KING VERSUS THE PEOPLE（BHANDARI） Article THE KING VERSUS THE PEOPLE: THE ABOLITION OF MONARCHY AND CONSTITUTION MAKING IN NEPAL Surendra BHANDARI Abstract The abolition of the institution of monarchy on May 28, 2008 marks a turning point in the political and constitutional history of Nepal. This saga of constitutional development exemplifies the systemic conflict between people’s’ aspirations for democracy and kings’ ambitions for unlimited power. With the abolition of the monarchy, the process of making a new constitution for the Republic of Nepal has started under the auspices of the Constituent Assembly of Nepal. This paper primarily examines the reasons or causes behind the abolition of monarchy in Nepal. It analyzes the three main reasons for the abolition of monarchy. First, it argues that frequent slights and attacks to constitutionalism by the Nepalese kings had brought the institution of the monarchy to its end. The continuous failures of the early democratic government and the Supreme Court of Nepal in bringing the monarchy within the constitutional framework emphatically weakened the fledgling democracy, but these failures eventually became fatal to the monarchical institution itself. Second, it analyzes the indirect but crucial role of India in the abolition of monarchy. Third, it explains the ten-year-long Maoist insurgency and how the people’s movement culminated with its final blow to the monarchy. Furthermore, this paper also analyzes why the peace and constitution writing process has yet to take concrete shape or make significant process, despite the abolition of the monarchy. Finally, it concludes by recapitulating the main arguments of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Report 15-16 Nov 2016, BKK, Thailand 6
    Regional Preparatory Meeting for the Launch of a Global Judicial Integrity Network 15-16 November 2016 Bangkok, Thailand Millennium Hilton Hotel Summary Report Telephone: +6622882100 Fax: +6622812129 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unodc.org Copyright © United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2016 This report is intended for internal use by law enforcement, regulatory and other relevant government agencies and is not intended for public distribution. This report was made possible through the generous financial support by the Government of Qatar, and with the cooperation of the Supreme Court of Thailand. 1 Table of Contents 1. WORKSHOP DETAILS ...................................................................................................... 3 2. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 4 3. OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................... 5 4. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 5 Results of the working groups discussions of session 4 on Strengthening Integrity and Preventing Corruption in the Judiciary and Justice Systems ............................................. 11 Recommendations for the Global Judicial Integrity Network - Results of the working group discussions in session 5 ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Viewpoint of the Supreme Court of Nepal on the Arbitration Process in the Light of Party Autonomy
    Tribhuvan UniversityTRIBHUVAN Journal UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, VOL. 35, NO. 2, DECEMBER, 2020 47 Vol. 35, No. 2: 47-58, December, 2020 Research Directorate, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v35i2.36189 VIEWPOINT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEPAL ON THE ARBITRATION PROCESS IN THE LIGHT OF PARTY AUTONOMY Sanad Devkota Associate Professor, Nepal law campus Kathamandu, TU Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Arbitration is a contract-based form of binding dispute resolution. In other words, a party’s right to refer a dispute to arbitration depends on the existence of an agreement between them and the other parties to the dispute that the dispute may be referred to arbitration. Arbitration is a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several individuals can make a decision about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments. The arbitration process is similar to a trial in that the parties make opening statements and present evidence to the arbitrator. Conflicts have existed in all cultures, religions and societies since time immemorial, as long as human have walked the earth. Human society is a repertoire where differences arise and persist as salient features, but this is also a platform where varieties of disputes find management in the form of resolution to energize the society. As conflicts are an integral part of human interaction, one must learn to deal with them tactfully, conventionally, disputes – commercial or otherwise were resolved by litigation but due to delays, costs, publicity and technicality associated with litigation, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes evolved. Various means of ADR or out of court settlement of disputes such as negotiation, conciliation and arbitration have come into practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of Nepal
    The Constitution of Nepal Date of Publication in Nepal Gazette 20 September 2015 (2072.6.3) The Constitution of Nepal (First Amendment), 2016 (2072) 28 February 2016 (2072.11.16) Preamble: We, the Sovereign People of Nepal, Internalizing the people's sovereign right and right to autonomy and self-rule, while maintaining freedom, sovereignty, territorial integrity, national unity, independence and dignity of Nepal, Recalling the glorious history of historic people's movements, armed conflict, dedication and sacrifice undertaken by the Nepalese people at times for the interest of the nation, democracy and progressive changes, and respecting for the martyrs and disappeared and victim citizens, Ending all forms of discrimination and oppression created by the feudalistic, autocratic, centralized, unitary system of governance, Protecting and promoting social and cultural solidarity, tolerance and harmony, and unity in diversity by recognizing the multi- ethnic, multi-lingual, multi-religious, multi-cultural and diverse regional characteristics, resolving to build an egalitarian society founded on the proportional inclusive and participatory principles in order to ensure economic equality, prosperity and social justice, by eliminating discrimination based on class, caste, region, language, religion and gender and all forms of caste-based untouchability, and (1) Being committed to socialism based on democratic norms and values including the people's competitive multiparty democratic system of governance, civil liberties, fundamental rights, human rights, adult franchise, periodic elections, full freedom of the press, and independent, impartial and competent judiciary and concept of the rule of law, and build a prosperous nation, Do hereby pass and promulgate this Constitution, through the Constituent Assembly, in order to fulfil the aspirations for sustainable peace, good governance, development and prosperity through the federal, democratic, republican system of governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Contemporary Nepal
    Deepak Thapa Deepak THE POLITICS OF This companion volume to A Survey of the Nepali People in 2017 has been designed to provide insights into CHANGE the general socio-political context in CHANGE which the survey was conducted. The contributors provide perspectives on Contributors a range of topics to highlight issues Nandita Baruah pertinent to the changes Nepal Yurendra Basnett has experienced in recent years, Jonathan Goodhand particularly since the adoption of Krishna Khanal the new constitution in 2015 and Sameer Khatiwada the 2017 elections. These include THE POLITICS OF Dhruba Kumar politics at the national and local Sanjaya Mahato levels; women in politics; identity Bimala Rai Paudyal and inclusion; the dynamics in Janak Rai borderland areas; and the challenges Chandan Sapkota facing the Nepali economy. The six Sara Shneiderman articles in this book are expected to Oliver Walton make a significant contribution to the literature on the early years of CHANGE federal Nepal. Reflections on Contemporary Nepal edited by 9789937 597531 Deepak Thapa THE POLITICS OF CHANGE THE POLITICS OF CHANGE Reflections on Contemporary Nepal edited by Deepak Thapa The production of this volume was supported through the Australian Government–The Asia Foundation Partnership on Subnational Governance in Nepal. Any views expressed herein do not reflect the views of the Australian Government or those of The Asia Foundation. © Social Science Baha and The Asia Foundation, 2019 ISBN 978 9937 597 53 1 Published by Himal Books for Social Science Baha and The Asia Foundation. Social Science Baha 345 Ramchandra Marg, Battisputali Kathmandu – 9, Nepal Tel: +977-1-4472807 www.soscbaha.org The Asia Foundation 1722 Thirbam Sadak Kathmandu, Nepal www.asiafoundation.org Himal Books Himal Kitab Pvt Ltd 521 Narayan Gopal Sadak, Lazimpat Kathmandu – 2 www.himalbooks.com Printed in Nepal Contents Foreword vii Introduction ix Deepak Thapa 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet – Nepal Bar Association
    Information Sheet – Nepal Bar Association I General Information Nepal Bar Association (NBA) was established in December 21st 1956. At that time, legal education in Nepal was in primitive stage. Thus, most of the lawyers were licensed on the basis of their experience in the legal field and without any academic qualification in law. Gradually, afterward law graduates from the universities started replacing traditional lawyers and now a days most of the member lawyers are with formal academic degrees from the universities. In its preliminary stage NEBA was functional without formal registration and formally in the year 1963 His majesty's Government of Nepal registered it as a professional organization under the provision of National Guidance Act 1961. Previously the Supreme Court of Nepal was the authority to issue a practicing license. Moreover, Disciplinary Committee of the Supreme Court of Nepal was responsible for any kind of disciplinary action against lawyers. As a result of continued effort of NEBA in the year 1993 Nepal Bar Council Act was evolved and Nepal Bar Council composed under provision of above act has full authority for issuing license to lawyers and to take disciplinary action against any lawyer. Bar Council Act 1993 has recognized NEBA and Vice-president of Bar Council is ' President of NEBA. Additionally, most of the Members of Bar Council are nominated/elected amongst members of NEBA. Legal Aid Act -1997 has also recognized NEBA. Government sponsored legal aid activities are also to be conducted through NEBA. Central Legal Aid Committee, a statutory body, chaired by HMG Minister of Law and Justice, comprises president of NEBA as ex officio member and secretary General of NEBA as ex officio member-secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard and Syllabus of Specialization Training
    Standard and Syllabus of Specialization Training................. Office of the Attorney General, Nepal Government Attorney’s Specialization Standard, 2075 Preamble: Whereas, it is expedient to make provisions, for effective government representation and defense; Government Attorney had to have training of specialization, the Office of Attorney General has laid down this standard. 1. Short Title and Commencement: (1) This Standard may be called as “Government attorney Specialization Standard, 2075”. (2) This Standard shall come into force from 15 Jestha 2074. 2. Definition: In this Standard, unless the subject or the context means otherwise: - (a) “Government Attorney” means the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Joint Attorney, Deputy Attorney, District Attorney, Deputy District Attorney, and the word shall also represent Gazetted officer of Government Attorney groups of Nepal Judicial Service. (b) “Specialized Government Attorney” means the government attorney who has gained a Standard determined special qualification, experience, and knowledge and has listed in section 8 of the standard. (c) “Management Committee” means the management committee of the Office of the Attorney General. (d) “Training provider Authority” means National Judicial Academy, Judicial Service Training Centre, Prosecution Training Centre and other National and Foreign institutions established according to the law which provide training on Law and Justice. 3. Government Attorney to be Specialized: (1) Government Attorney shall be specialized for the effective work performance of the Government Attorney. (2) While specialization of the government attorney according to the sub clause (1) the following specific area shall be considered: (a) Constitutional Law, (b) Organized Crime Prevention Law, (c) Banking and Commercial offence related Law, (d) Tax and Revenue Law, (e) Corruption Prevention Law, (f) Service related Law, (g) Government and Public Property Protection Law, (h) Cyber Crime Prevention Law, (i) Other Subjects as specified time to time by the Management Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Open Government in Nepal. Experiences with The
    T OWARDS Freedom Forum is an independent, non-governmental and not-for- profit civil society organization working for the cause of democracy O and human rights focused on press freedom, freedom of expression P and right to information in Nepal. E N TOWARDS Incepted in February, 2005, Freedom Forum has emerged as a G prominent national organization in promoting access to information OV and freedom of expression through dialogue, research, training, public advocacy and campaign and programme implementation. E RNM With its firm conviction and untiring efforts to establish Right to OPEN Information in practice, the Forum has stood itself in the forefront of RTI movement in Nepal since its establishment. E NT Among the major initiatives the Forum carried out to establish RTI better practices include proactive involvement in the RTI bill drafting IN GOVERNMENT process, public awareness and advocacy for the enactment of RTI Act, strategic information campaign, RTI use process facilitation, capacity NE building, sensitization and mainstreaming RTI efforts through holding of First National Convention on Right to Information-2011 PAL and subsequent adoption of the Kathmandu Declaration. EXP IN NEPAL The Forum has brought out numerous books, research journals, EXPERIENCES WITH THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION newsletters, periodic reports and analytical papers on different E dimensions of RTI and is effortful to establish it as a crosscutting issue RI E of empowerment and transformation. NC E S WITH TH E R IGHT TO I NFORMATION Freedom Forum P. O. Box: 24292
    [Show full text]
  • ELIMINATION of GENDER DISCRIMINATORY LEGAL PROVISION by the SUPREME COURT of NEPAL with REFERENCE to WOMEN's RIGHT to PROPERTY ∗ Nutan Chandra Subedi
    ELIMINATION OF GENDER DISCRIMINATORY LEGAL PROVISION BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEPAL WITH REFERENCE TO WOMEN'S RIGHT TO PROPERTY ∗ Nutan Chandra Subedi INTRODUCTION Women's rights are part of human rights and gender justice is integral to social justice. Definitely, women are inevitable complement of human society and it can not be imagined of a society without the existence of women. So, it is not exaggerated to say that the violation of women's right is deemed to be the violation of the rights of entire human society. The property right is the subject of economic justice that is needed to every human being in order to subsist as a human person in society. Indeed, women's right to property was the most and intensively discussed issue in various workshops and seminars at local and central level, after the promulgation of the Constitution of Kingdom of Nepal, 1990, which ensured to eliminate discriminatory legal provisions through the initiation of judiciary. Basically, where two women activist lawyers challenged the discriminatory legal provisions outlined in the chapter on Partition Share of National Code, 2020, before the Supreme Court, it was shaped extensively as hot issue of discussion throughout the nation. While the court issued a directive to introduce appropriate bill, it opened the gateway of spate in respect of negative and positive impacts in this respect. Consequently, after the dozen of attempts made by feminist spirited parliamentarians and women rights activities, 11 th amendment in National Code, 2020 regarding women rights Bill was passed in 21 st session of parliament in September 25, A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • KSLR Citation Guideline
    Kathmandu School of Law (KSL) Suryabinayak - 4, Bhaktapur, Nepal +01 663 4555, +01 663 4663 [email protected] www.ksl.edu.np KATHMANDU SCHOOL OF LAW COMPREHENSIVE STYLE TO LEGAL CITATION Third Edition Chief Editor: Anuj Chand Editors: Nirwan Jung Karki Prajwol Bickram Rana Rosy Shrestha Contributors: Ashwin Kumar K.C. • Nikhil Dongol • Prasansha Rimal • Sampurna Basnet • Sulav Jung Rayamajhi KATHMANDU SCHOOL OF LAW Special Thanks to: Anjana Dhital • Anurodh Koirala • Arzoo Karki • Ashlesha Joshi • Pragya KC • Surakshya Baral Advisors: Prof. Madhav Prasad Acharya • Prof. Yubaraj Sangroula • Prof. Ben Saul • Prof. Geeta Pathak • Prof. Zhu Wenqi • Prof. Muhammad Amir Rana • Prof. Hongkong Rana • Prof. Evelyn L. Wilson • Prof. Nomita Aggarwal • Prof. Wang Sixin • Prof. Prakash K.C. • Prof. Zakir Hussain • Prof. Kumar Ingnam • Prof. Peter Crook • Mr. James Lin • Assoc. Prof. Prem Chandra Rai • Assoc. Prof. Atindra Dahal • Asst. Prof. Amritha Vishwanath Shenoy • Asst. Prof. Ravi Prakash Vyas Published by: Kathmandu School of Law (KSL) P.O. Box: 6618, Suryabinayak-04, Bhaktapur, Nepal Phone: 977-1-6634455, 6634663, Fax: 6634801 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ksl.edu.np © 2020 Kathmandu School of Law (KSL) Layout: Asterdio Inc, PL. Cover Design: Nirwan Jung Karki Printed at: Nebula Printers, Kathmandu Published year: 2020 ISBN: 978-9937-8237-7-7 MESSAGE FROM THE KSLR EDITOR-IN-CHIEF I am pleased to share a few words on the third edition of the Kathmandu School of Law (KSL) Comprehensive Style to Legal Citation. The KSL Comprehensive Style has attempted to establish itself as a standard for legal citation in Nepal. This is especially important in Nepali legal arena which lacks any standard citation guide in a comprehensive manner.
    [Show full text]