DOCSLIB.ORG

Attachment SOTERM)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attachment SOTERM) Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Appendix SOTERM-2009 Actinide Chemistry Source Term United States Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad Field Office Carlsbad, New Mexico Appendix SOTERM-2009 Actinide Chemistry Source Term Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2009 Table of Contents SOTERM-1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................SOTERM-1 SOTERM-2.0 Expected WIPP Repository Conditions, Chemistry, and Processes ......SOTERM-3 SOTERM-2.1 Ambient Geochemical Conditions .....................................................SOTERM-3 SOTERM-2.2 Repository Conditions........................................................................SOTERM-3 SOTERM-2.2.1 Repository Pressure.....................................................................SOTERM-5 SOTERM-2.2.2 Repository Temperature..............................................................SOTERM-5 SOTERM-2.2.3 Water Content and Relative Humidity ........................................SOTERM-5 SOTERM-2.2.4 Minimum Repository Brine Volume...........................................SOTERM-6 SOTERM-2.2.5 DRZ.............................................................................................SOTERM-7 SOTERM-2.3 Repository Chemistry.........................................................................SOTERM-7 SOTERM-2.3.1 WIPP Brine..................................................................................SOTERM-7 SOTERM-2.3.2 Brine pH and pH Buffering.........................................................SOTERM-9 SOTERM-2.3.3 Selected MgO Chemistry and Reactions...................................SOTERM-13 SOTERM-2.3.4 Iron Chemistry and Corrosion...................................................SOTERM-14 SOTERM-2.3.5 Chemistry of Lead in the WIPP ................................................SOTERM-16 SOTERM-2.3.6 Organic Chelating Agents .........................................................SOTERM-17 SOTERM-2.3.7 CPR in WIPP Waste..................................................................SOTERM-19 SOTERM-2.4 Important Postemplacement Processes ............................................SOTERM-19 SOTERM-2.4.1 Microbial Effects in the WIPP ..................................................SOTERM-19 SOTERM-2.4.2 Radiolysis Effects in the WIPP .................................................SOTERM-23 SOTERM-2.5 Changes in WIPP Conditions since the CRA-2004 and the CRA- 2004 PABC ......................................................................................................SOTERM-27 SOTERM-3.0 WIPP-Relevant Actinide Chemistry ....................................................SOTERM-29 SOTERM-3.1 Actinide Inventory in the WIPP .......................................................SOTERM-30 SOTERM-3.2 Thorium Chemistry ..........................................................................SOTERM-33 SOTERM-3.2.1 Thorium Environmental Chemistry...........................................SOTERM-33 SOTERM-3.2.2 WIPP-Specific Results since the CRA-2004 and the CRA- 2004 PABC..................................................................................................SOTERM-35 SOTERM-3.3 Uranium Chemistry ..........................................................................SOTERM-37 SOTERM-3.3.1 Uranium Environmental Chemistry ..........................................SOTERM-38 SOTERM-3.3.2 WIPP-Specific Results since the CRA-2004 and the CRA- 2004 PABC..................................................................................................SOTERM-45 SOTERM-3.4 Neptunium Chemistry ......................................................................SOTERM-47 SOTERM-3.4.1 Neptunium Environmental Chemistry.......................................SOTERM-47 SOTERM-3.4.2 WIPP-Specific Results since the CRA-2004 and the CRA- 2004 PABC..................................................................................................SOTERM-48 SOTERM-3.5 Plutonium Chemistry........................................................................SOTERM-48 SOTERM-3.5.1 Plutonium Environmental Chemistry........................................SOTERM-49 SOTERM-3.5.2 WIPP-Specific Results since the CRA-2004 and the CRA- 2004 PABC..................................................................................................SOTERM-52 SOTERM-3.6 Americium and Curium Chemistry ..................................................SOTERM-54 SOTERM-3.6.1 Americium and Curium Environmental Chemistry ..................SOTERM-55 SOTERM-3.6.2 WIPP-Specific Results since the CRA-2004 and the CRA- 2004 PABC..................................................................................................SOTERM-58 SOTERM-3.7 Complexation of Actinides by WIPP Organic Chelating Agents ....SOTERM-60 DOE/WIPP-09-3424 SOTERM-iii Appendix SOTERM-2009 Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2009 SOTERM-3.8 Actinide Colloids..............................................................................SOTERM-60 SOTERM-3.8.1 Actinide Colloids in the Environment.......................................SOTERM-61 SOTERM-3.8.2 WIPP-Specific Results since the CRA-2004 PABC .................SOTERM-63 SOTERM-3.9 Changes in Actinide Speciation Information since the CRA-2004 and the CRA-2004 PABC................................................................................SOTERM-63 SOTERM-4.0 Calculation of the WIPP Actinide Source Term ..................................SOTERM-66 SOTERM-4.1 Overview of WIPP Approach to Calculate Actinide Solubilities ....SOTERM-67 SOTERM-4.2 Use of Oxidation-State-Invariant Analogs.......................................SOTERM-67 SOTERM-4.3 Actinide Inventory and Oxidation State Distribution in the WIPP..SOTERM-69 SOTERM-4.4 Actinide Speciation Reactions Used in the FMT Model..................SOTERM-70 SOTERM-4.4.1 The III Actinides: Pu(III), Am(III), Cm(III) .............................SOTERM-71 SOTERM-4.4.2 The IV Actinides: Th(IV), U(IV), Pu(IV), Np(IV) ...................SOTERM-71 SOTERM-4.4.3 The V Actinides: Np(V)...........................................................SOTERM-74 SOTERM-4.4.4 The VI Actinides: U(VI) ...........................................................SOTERM-75 SOTERM-4.5 Calculations of Actinide Solubility Using the FMT Computer Code .................................................................................................................SOTERM-76 SOTERM-4.5.1 Pitzer Approach for High-Ionic-Strength Brines ......................SOTERM-76 SOTERM-4.5.2 Calculated Actinide Solubilities................................................SOTERM-77 SOTERM-4.6 Calculation of the Effects of Organic Ligands on Actinide Solubility..........................................................................................................SOTERM-79 SOTERM-4.7 Calculation of Colloidal Contribution to Actinide Solution Concentrations .................................................................................................SOTERM-80 SOTERM-5.0 Use of the Actinide Source Term in PA...............................................SOTERM-83 SOTERM-5.1 Simplifications..................................................................................SOTERM-83 SOTERM-5.1.1 Elements and Isotopes Modeled................................................SOTERM-83 SOTERM-5.1.2 Use of Brine End Members.......................................................SOTERM-84 SOTERM-5.1.3 Sampling of Uncertain Parameters............................................SOTERM-85 SOTERM-5.1.4 Combining the Transport of Dissolved and Colloidal Species in the Salado...................................................................................SOTERM-88 SOTERM-5.2 Construction of the Source Term .....................................................SOTERM-88 SOTERM-5.3 Example Calculation of Actinide Solubility ....................................SOTERM-91 SOTERM-5.4 Calculated Dissolved, Colloidal, and Total Actinide Solubilities....SOTERM-91 SOTERM-6.0 References ............................................................................................SOTERM-94 List of Figures Figure SOTERM-1. Molal H+ Concentration Measured as a Function of Time During the Solubility Experiments in 2.67 and 5.15 m MgCl2 Solution ........................................................................SOTERM-12 Figure SOTERM-2. Expected Dominant Actinide Oxidation States as a Function of the Standard Reduction Potential at pH = 7 in Water That is in Equilibrium With Atmospheric CO2.............SOTERM-23 Figure SOTERM-3. NaCl Brine Radiolysis Species and Suggested Mechanism of Production............................................................................SOTERM-25 Figure SOTERM-4. Radiolytic Formation of Hypochlorite Ion in Solutions of Various NaCl Concentrations at a Constant Alpha Activity DOE/WIPP-09-3424 SOTERM-iv Appendix SOTERM-2009 Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2009 of 37 GBq/L at pH~12 (Based on Data in Kelm, Pashalidis, and Kim 1999) .........................................................................SOTERM-25 Figure SOTERM-5. Solubility of Amorphous Th(IV) Oxyhydroxide as a Function of Carbonate Concentration in 5 M for pH = 2–8 (A) and pH – 8–13.5 (B)..........................................................SOTERM-36 Figure SOTERM-6. Solubility of Th(OH)4(am)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gas Phase Chemical Evolution of Uranium, Aluminum, and Iron Oxides Received: 22 January 2018 Batikan Koroglu1, Scott Wagnon 1, Zurong Dai1, Jonathan C
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Gas Phase Chemical Evolution of Uranium, Aluminum, and Iron Oxides Received: 22 January 2018 Batikan Koroglu1, Scott Wagnon 1, Zurong Dai1, Jonathan C. Crowhurst1, Accepted: 19 June 2018 Michael R. Armstrong1, David Weisz1, Marco Mehl1,2, Joseph M. Zaug1, Harry B. Radousky1 & Published: xx xx xxxx Timothy P. Rose1 We use a recently developed plasma-fow reactor to experimentally investigate the formation of oxide nanoparticles from gas phase metal atoms during oxidation, homogeneous nucleation, condensation, and agglomeration processes. Gas phase uranium, aluminum, and iron atoms were cooled from 5000 K to 1000 K over short-time scales (∆t < 30 ms) at atmospheric pressures in the presence of excess oxygen. In-situ emission spectroscopy is used to measure the variation in monoxide/atomic emission intensity ratios as a function of temperature and oxygen fugacity. Condensed oxide nanoparticles are collected inside the reactor for ex-situ analyses using scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM, TEM) to determine their structural compositions and sizes. A chemical kinetics model is also developed to describe the gas phase reactions of iron and aluminum metals. The resulting sizes and forms of the crystalline nanoparticles (FeO-wustite, eta-Al2O3, UO2, and alpha-UO3) depend on the thermodynamic properties, kinetically-limited gas phase chemical reactions, and local redox conditions. This work shows the nucleation and growth of metal oxide particles in rapidly-cooling gas is closely coupled to the kinetically-controlled chemical pathways for vapor-phase oxide formation. Gas phase nucleation and growth of metal oxide nanoparticles is an important topic for many areas of chemistry, physics, material science, and engineering1–6.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Characterization of Uranium(VI) Sorption Complexes on Iron(III)-Rich Acid Mine Water Colloids
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70 (2006) 5469–5487 www.elsevier.com/locate/gca Molecular characterization of uranium(VI) sorption complexes on iron(III)-rich acid mine water colloids Kai-Uwe Ulrich a,*, Andre´ Rossberg a,b, Harald Foerstendorf a, Harald Za¨nker a, Andreas C. Scheinost a,b a Institute of Radiochemistry, FZ Rossendorf e.V., P.O. Box 510119, D-01314 Dresden, Germany b Rossendorf Beamline at ESRF, B.P. 220, F-38043 Grenoble, France Received 7 November 2005; accepted in revised form 21 August 2006 Abstract A mixing of metal-loaded acid mine drainage with shallow groundwater or surface waters usually initiates oxidation and/or hydrolysis of dissolved metals such as iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al). Colloidal particles may appear and agglomerate with increasing pH. Likewise chemical conditions may occur while flooding abandoned uranium mines. Here, the risk assessment of hazards requires reliable knowl- edge on the mobility of uranium (U). A flooding process was simulated at mesocosm scale by mixing U-contaminated acid mine water with near-neutral groundwater under oxic conditions. The mechanism of U-uptake by fresh precipitates and the molecular structure of U bonding were determined to estimate the mobility of U(VI). Analytical and spectroscopic methods such as Extended X-ray Absorption Fine-Structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy at the Fe K-edge and the U LIII-edge, and Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infra- red (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy were employed. The freshly formed precipitate was identified as colloidal two-line ferrihydrite. It removed U(VI) from solution by sorption processes, while surface precipitation or structural incorporation of U was not observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Depleted Uranium Technical Brief
    Disclaimer - For assistance accessing this document or additional information,please contact [email protected]. Depleted Uranium Technical Brief United States Office of Air and Radiation EPA-402-R-06-011 Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 December 2006 Depleted Uranium Technical Brief EPA 402-R-06-011 December 2006 Project Officer Brian Littleton U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Radiation Protection Division ii iii FOREWARD The Depleted Uranium Technical Brief is designed to convey available information and knowledge about depleted uranium to EPA Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene Coordinators, contractors, and other Agency managers involved with the remediation of sites contaminated with this material. It addresses relative questions regarding the chemical and radiological health concerns involved with depleted uranium in the environment. This technical brief was developed to address the common misconception that depleted uranium represents only a radiological health hazard. It provides accepted data and references to additional sources for both the radiological and chemical characteristics, health risk as well as references for both the monitoring and measurement and applicable treatment techniques for depleted uranium. Please Note: This document has been changed from the original publication dated December 2006. This version corrects references in Appendix 1 that improperly identified the content of Appendix 3 and Appendix 4. The document also clarifies the content of Appendix 4. iv Acknowledgments This technical bulletin is based, in part, on an engineering bulletin that was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA), with the assistance of Trinity Engineering Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    BNL-52661 Formal Report MECHANISMS OF RADIONUCLIDE-HYROXYCARBOXYLIC ACID INTERACTIONS FOR DECONTAMINATION OF METALLIC SURFACES A.J. FRANCIS, C.J. DODGE, AND J.B. GILLOW Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 G.P. HALADA AND C.R. CLAYTON Department of Materials Science, SUNY at Stony Brook, NY 11794 FINAL REPORT PROJECT PERIOD: 10/1/98 TO 9/30/01 PROJECT NUMBER: 64946 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United State Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, not any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency, contractor, or subcontractor thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency, contractor or subcontractor thereof. MECHANISMS OF RADIONUCLIDE-HYROXYCARBOXYLIC ACID INTERACTIONS FOR DECONTAMINATION OF METALLIC SURFACES* A.J. FRANCIS, C.J. DODGE, AND J.B. GILLOW Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 G.P. HALADA AND C.R. CLAYTON Department of Materials Science, SUNY at Stony Brook, NY 11794 FINAL REPORT PROJECT PERIOD: 10/1/98 TO 9/30/01 PROJECT NUMBER: 64946 *This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Inis: Terminology Charts
    IAEA-INIS-13A(Rev.0) XA0400071 INIS: TERMINOLOGY CHARTS agree INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, AUGUST 1970 INISs TERMINOLOGY CHARTS TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ... ......... *.* 1 PREFACE 2 INTRODUCTION ... .... *a ... oo 3 LIST OF SUBJECT FIELDS REPRESENTED BY THE CHARTS ........ 5 GENERAL DESCRIPTOR INDEX ................ 9*999.9o.ooo .... 7 FOREWORD This document is one in a series of publications known as the INIS Reference Series. It is to be used in conjunction with the indexing manual 1) and the thesaurus 2) for the preparation of INIS input by national and regional centrea. The thesaurus and terminology charts in their first edition (Rev.0) were produced as the result of an agreement between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). Except for minor changesq the terminology and the interrela- tionships btween rms are those of the December 1969 edition of the Euratom Thesaurus 3) In all matters of subject indexing and ontrol, the IAEA followed the recommendations of Euratom for these charts. Credit and responsibility for the present version of these charts must go to Euratom. Suggestions for improvement from all interested parties. particularly those that are contributing to or utilizing the INIS magnetic-tape services are welcomed. These should be addressed to: The Thesaurus Speoialist/INIS Section Division of Scientific and Tohnioal Information International Atomic Energy Agency P.O. Box 590 A-1011 Vienna, Austria International Atomic Energy Agency Division of Sientific and Technical Information INIS Section June 1970 1) IAEA-INIS-12 (INIS: Manual for Indexing) 2) IAEA-INIS-13 (INIS: Thesaurus) 3) EURATOM Thesaurusq, Euratom Nuclear Documentation System.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study on Precipitation Methods of Yellow
    Precipitation and purification of uranium from rock phosphate Elshafeea H. Y. Abow Slama1, Etemad Ebraheem2 and Adam K. Sam1 1Sudan Atomic Energy Commission P.O. Box 3001, Khartoum-Sudan 2 Sinner University ABSTRACT This study was carried-out to leach uranium from rock phosphate using sulphuric acid in the presence of potassium chlorate as an oxidant and to investigate the relative purity of different forms of yellow cakes produced with ammonia {( NH 4 )2 U2O7 }, magnesia (UO3.xH 2O ) and sodium hydroxide Na2U 2O7 as precipitants, as well as purification of the products with TBP extraction and matching its impurity levels with specifications of the commercial products. Alpha-particle spectrometry was used for determination of activity concentration of uranium isotopes (234U and 238U) in rock phosphate, resulting green phosphoric acid solution, and in different forms of the yellow cake from which the equivalent mass concentration of uranium was deduced. Likewise, atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) was used for determination of impurities (Pb, Ni, Cd, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu). On the average, the equivalent mass concentration of uranium was 119.38±79.66 ppm (rock phosphate) and 57.85±20.46 ppm (green solution) with corresponding low percent of dissolution (48%) which is considered low. The isotopic ratio (234U: 238U) in all stages of hydrometallurgical process was not much differ from unity indicating lack of fractionation. Upon comparing the levels of impurities in different form of crude yellow cakes, it was found that the lowest levels were measured in UO3.xH2O. This implies that saturated magnesia is least aggressive relative to other precipitants and gives relatively pure crude cake.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Co-Precipitation with Iron Oxide Minerals
    This document was prepared in conjunction with work accomplished under Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 with the U. S. Department of Energy. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, phone: (800) 553-6847, fax: (703) 605-6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/support/index.html Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062, phone: (865)576-8401, fax: (865)576-5728 email: [email protected] WSRC-MS-2002-00322 Uranium Co-precipitation with Iron Oxide Minerals MARTINE C.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Nuclear Energy Agency International Workshop on Chemical Hazards in Fuel Cycle Facilities Nuclear Processing
    Nuclear Safety NEA/ CSNI/R(2019)9/ADD1 May 2019 www.oecd-nea.org Proceedings of the Nuclear Energy Agency International Workshop on Chemical Hazards in Fuel Cycle Facilities Nuclear Processing Appendix C NEA/CSNI/R(2019)9/ADD1 The non-radiological risks involving dangerous chemicals in nuclear fuel cycle facilities - French framework regulation - Youcef HEMIMOU, Brice DELIME, Raffaello AMOROSI, Josquin VERNON French Nuclear Safety Authority 15, rue Louis Lejeune CS70013 – 92541 Montrouge Cedex [email protected] Accidents involving hazardous chemicals pose a significant threat to the population and the environment. Among nuclear facilities, this threat applies in particular to the fuel cycle facilities. As a consequence, the activities related to hazardous chemicals are covered by a legal framework that, depending on the nature of the activity and the associated risks, aims to guarantee that, they will not be likely to be detrimental to safety, public health and environment [1]. The aim of this article is to present a summary of the main regulations involving dangerous chemicals in nuclear fuel cycle facilities that have to be taken into account in the safety demonstration. The latter must prove that the risks of an accident - radiological or not - and the scale of its consequences, given the current state of knowledge, practices and the vulnerability of the installation environment, are as low as possible under acceptable economic conditions. Key words : nuclear fuel cycle facilities, safety demonstration, principle of defence in depth, deterministic approach, probabilistic approach, dangerous chemicals, non-radiological risks, Seveso Directive, domino effects. 1. THE DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES IN NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Chapter
    IN SITU AND EX SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF RADIONUCLIDES CONTAMINATED SOILS AT NUCLEAR AND NORM SITES Francis, A. J. and Nancharaiah, Y. V. Accepted for publication in Environmental Remediation and Restoration of Contaminated Nuclear and NORM Sites, L. Van Velzen, Ed., in press, Elsevier Ltd., 2015. November 2014 Biological, Environmental & Climate Sciences Dept. Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Notice: This manuscript has been authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. This preprint is intended for publication in a journal or proceedings. Since changes may be made before publication, it may not be cited or reproduced without the authorʼs permission. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Pellet Fabrication Characteristics of TRU-Oxides Produced by Modified Direct Denitration
    Pellet Fabrication Characteristics of TRU-Oxides Produced by Modified Direct Denitration E.A. Walker, R.J. Vedder, and L.K. Felker Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 ([email protected]) INTRODUCTION fabrication techniques to yield pellets with densities greater than 96% TD.” Mailen, et al. [6] produced Modified Direct Denitration (MDD) was a MOXs, UO3-PuO2 (~22 wt % Pu), which were process developed at the Oak Ridge National reduced, pressed into pellets, and sintered. The Laboratory in the 1980s [1,2] to produce fuel-grade sintered pellets had “densities of 95% of theoretical, UO2 from uranyl nitrate solutions and fuel- grade good external appearances, and good microstructures mixed oxide (MOX) powder from the coprocessed U- [6],” and were completely soluble in refluxed 7M Pu nitrate solution product. MDD is being nitric acid. The current work has found the MOX reexamined on a glove box scale for coconversion of directly out of the kiln to also be completely soluble the mixed actinide nitrate solution (U+TRU) into in nitric acid. A sinterable PuO2 product was also MOXs suitable for use in fuel fabrication or as a made by Mailen but found to have poor flowabilty. storage or disposal form. In MDD, ammonium Plutonium dioxide produced in the current work, nitrate is added to a metal nitrate solution and the however, was found to flow and pour without double salt that forms [e.g., (NH4)2UO2(NO3)4, difficulty. (NH4)2Pu(NO3)6, (NH4)2Np(NO3)6, (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6] is decomposed inside a sloped and rotating heated CURRENT DEVELOPMENT EFFORT pipe.
    [Show full text]
  • Rpt POL-TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS 98 BY
    SWCAA TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS '98 by CAS ASIL TAP SQER CAS No HAP POLLUTANT NAME HAP CAT 24hr ug/m3 Ann ug/m3 Class lbs/yr lbs/hr none17 BN 1750 0.20 ALUMINUM compounds none0.00023 AY None None ARSENIC compounds (E649418) ARSENIC COMPOUNDS none0.12 AY 20 None BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE, XYLENES BENZENE none0.12 AY 20 None BTEX BENZENE none0.000083 AY None None CHROMIUM (VI) compounds CHROMIUM COMPOUN none0.000083 AY None None CHROMIUM compounds (E649962) CHROMIUM COMPOUN none0.0016 AY 0.5 None COKE OVEN COMPOUNDS (E649830) - CAA 112B COKE OVEN EMISSIONS none3.3 BN 175 0.02 COPPER compounds none0.67 BN 175 0.02 COTTON DUST (raw) none17 BY 1,750 0.20 CYANIDE compounds CYANIDE COMPOUNDS none33 BN 5,250 0.60 FIBROUS GLASS DUST none33 BY 5,250 0.60 FINE MINERAL FIBERS FINE MINERAL FIBERS none8.3 BN 175 0.20 FLUORIDES, as F, containing fluoride, NOS none0.00000003 AY None None FURANS, NITRO- DIOXINS/FURANS none5900 BY 43,748 5.0 HEXANE, other isomers none3.3 BN 175 0.02 IRON SALTS, soluble as Fe none00 AN None None ISOPROPYL OILS none0.5 AY None None LEAD compounds (E650002) LEAD COMPOUNDS none0.4 BY 175 0.02 MANGANESE compounds (E650010) MANGANESE COMPOU none0.33 BY 175 0.02 MERCURY compounds (E650028) MERCURY COMPOUND none33 BY 5,250 0.60 MINERAL FIBERS ((fine), incl glass, glass wool, rock wool, slag w FINE MINERAL FIBERS none0.0021 AY 0.5 None NICKEL 59 (NY059280) NICKEL COMPOUNDS none0.0021 AY 0.5 None NICKEL compounds (E650036) NICKEL COMPOUNDS none0.00000003 AY None None NITROFURANS (nitrofurans furazolidone) DIOXINS/FURANS none0.0013
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium (VI) Solubility in WIPP Brine
    2013 LANL-CO ACRSP LCO-ACP-14 Jean Francois Lucchini Michael Richmann Marian Borkowski Uranium (VI) Solubility in WIPP Brine LA-UR 13-20786 Uranium (VI) Solubility in WIPP Brine LCO-ACP-14, Revision 1 Page ii Page left intentionally blank Uranium (VI) Solubility in WIPP Brine LCO-ACP-14, Revision 1 Page iii Uranium (VI) Solubility in WIPP Brine J.F. Lucchini, M.K. Richmann, and M. Borkowski EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The solubility of uranium (VI) in Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)-relevant brine was determined as part of an overall effort to establish a more robust WIPP chemistry model to support ongoing WIPP recertification activities. This research was performed as part of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Carlsbad Operations (LANL-CO) Actinide Chemistry and Repository Science Program (ACRSP). The WIPP Actinide Source Term Program (ASTP) did not develop a model for the 2+ solubility of actinides in the VI oxidation state. The upper limit of the solubility of UO2 , in the absence of WIPP-specific data, is presently set at 10-3 M in the WIPP Performance Assessment (PA) for all expected conditions. This value was selected at the recommendation of the Environment Protection Agency (EPA), based on their review of the relevant data available in the literature and accounts for the potential and likely effects of carbonate complexation on the solubility of uranium (VI). In this report, the results of experiments to establish the solubility of U(VI) in WIPP brines are presented. The solubility of uranium (VI) was determined in WIPP-relevant brines as a function of pCH+, and in the absence or presence of carbonate.
    [Show full text]