Summer 2012 Penn Political Ppr Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SUMMER 2012 PENN POLITICAL PPR REVIEW SUPER PACS pg 6 SANCTIONS pg 18 ROMÉO DALLAIRE pg 25 time to care about the young folks pg 9 staff EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPHEN FRITZ STAFF ARTISTS KAYLA FUCHS MANAGING EDITOR ARYNNE WEXLER KAILUN WANG LAYOUT AND ART EDITOR JEREMY BRINSTER ONLINE EDITOR EMILY KIM INTERVIEW STAFF JOHN CHEO INTERVIEW EDITOR MICHAEL SOYFER ANTHONY CRUZ CHIEF-OF-STAFF URJA MITTAL SAMUEL GERSTEN BUSINESS MANAGER MONICA KWOK ALEXANDER KERN MARKETING MANAGER MATT TRUSZ AMY LOPEZ MONICA PFISTER ETAN RASKAS SENIOR EDITORS CAMILLA BRANDFIELD-HARVEY JON ROTH LAYOUT EDITORS KAYLA FUCHS HARDIK GUPTA EDITORS DAVID CHEN ADAN JUAREZ SABA JAFRI GABRIELLA KAHN EMILY KIM NATALIE LU GREG KURZHALS DANIEL LEVINSON SOAPBOX BLOG ADAM HERSH ARIELA ROSENBERG MONICA KWOK CHRIS SHIMAMOTO URJA MITTAL ELIZABETH THOM ADRIAN RIOS NICK YU JACK SOLOWEY MICHAEL SOYFER COPY EDITORS SAMANTHA ALMAN JUSTIN BARRY BUSINESS COMMITTEE PHILIP FUCHS LYDIA FILOSA KEVIN GRANT TARA HOFBAUER COLE KOSYDAR MINA MILJEVIC MONICA KWOK RINA MOSS JACK LALLY HANNAH SMYTHE MATT TRUSZ ARYNNE WEXLER COVER ART KAILUN WANG PPR penn political review Volume VIII Issue 3 contents NATIONAL HOW TO WIN A FIGHT Marc-Anthony Serrano pg 4 THE DAM FLOWETH OVER Jonathan Fried pg 6 DRILL MAYBE DRILL Charles Rubenfeld pg 8 GLOBAL TEN THINGS YOU DIDN’T KNOW ABOUT CASTRO Anthony Cruz pg 13 A DANGEROUS ALLIANCE KAYLA FUCHS Shlomo Klapper pg 14 KAILUN WANG TIME TO END THE EMBARGO ON CUBA? JOHN CHEO ANTHONY CRUZ Raquel MacGregor pg 16 SAMUEL GERSTEN ALEXANDER KERN SOCIETY UNDER SANCTIONS AMY LOPEZ MONICA PFISTER Maya Rajaratnam pg 18 ETAN RASKAS OFFSETTING EMERGENT MARKET POLITICAL RISK KAYLA FUCHS HARDIK GUPTA Ned Shell pg 20 ADAN JUAREZ GABRIELLA KAHN NATALIE LU FEATURE ADAM HERSH MONICA KWOK POWER TO THE YOUNG PEOPLE URJA MITTAL ADRIAN RIOS Gregory Segal pg 9 JACK SOLOWEY MICHAEL SOYFER PHILIP FUCHS INTERVIEW KEVIN GRANT COLE KOSYDAR TREVOR POTTER pg 22 MONICA KWOK JACK LALLY ROMÉO DALLAIRE pg 25 MATT TRUSZ ARYNNE WEXLER Copyright 2012 Penn Political Review NATIONAL HOW TO REVIEW BY MARC-ANTHONY SERRANO WIN A FIGHT Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart, and Bill Maher have become masters of the extremely lucrative business of political satire. Detached from their opinions, Colbert and Stewart (and Maher, when he’s not being sexist) are agreeable, funny comedians whose job of keeping Americans informed about political irrationality holds politics at the forefront of topical conversations. While impressive indeed, more impressive is author Daniel Kurtzman’s ability to convey satirical absurdity in print, the simultaneously most intellectual and least sought form of communication. with a LIBERAL For the few book readers that still exist in today’s TV-dominat- tips in an organized fashion. For example, if one is having an argu- ed society, Kurtzman’s book is a sort of dream come true. As would ment with a significant other, one shouldn’t, “resort to amateurish, be expected for a self-help composition, How to Win is heavily an- passive-aggressive behavior,” or, “let resentments fester.” Converse- notated and isn’t intended to be read exhaustively—though doing ly, one should, “tease their significant other,” and most definitely so would certainly result in an even greater appreciation of the wit should, “agree on a safeword to signal when one has reached their and vitriol, which Kurtzman so snidely employs. The book is orga- limit.” In practice, all of these tips can be immensely helpful in nized into eight chapters, all of which carry very specific themes, avoiding the unwelcome recoil many experience when discussing including the following: What It Means to Be a Conservative, How such controversial topics. There is a reason why your grandparents to Win Friends While Antagonizing People, Kick-Ass Arguments: tell you to never discuss religion or politics at the table. A Step-by-Step Guide, and When All Else Fails: 27,000 Ways to Furthermore, the author’s contrarianism is precisely what Insult Liberals. Though the titles are humorous and appealing, makes this book so enticing. The frank manner in which all of the much of the underlying material, while satirical, actually provides topics are conveyed can be startling to many readers. This book assistance to political debate. isn’t for the elders who are colorfully decorated in full suits of mili- Daniel Kurtzman sifts through the logic of many standard ar- tary regalia. The topics are most definitely controversial and out- guments (e.g. whether or not to raise taxes). He indicates specific, right offensive and the book would likely offend many average lib- intelligent points in order to win an argument with sophistication eral readers; however, this is a contribution to the book’s success. rather than with haste. In fact, Kurtzman’s advice is incredibly To effectively debate and argue as a liberal, it’s imperative to know specific: he varies his words according to the proselytizer, from how the foe is going to approach you. This wise technique shows a spouse to perfect stranger, co-worker, or parent. He lists these Kurtzman’s unequivocal wit. 4 | PENN POLITICAL REVIEW | SUMMER 2012 NATIONAL Marc-Anthony Serrano writes the first in a series of book reviews for Penn Polit- ical Review. He tackles Daniel Kurtzman’s pair of best-selling political satires, How to Win a Fight with a Liberal and How to Win a Fight with a Conservative. WIN A FIGHT with a CONSERVATIVE When considering all from the previous book, Kurtzman Though offensive, these jokes should be taken in jest. proved his political adaptability in writing How to Win a Fight The book definitely does an admirable job at preparing the lib- with a Conservative. The books are almost identical in structure. eral mind for a confrontation with its ideological opponents—and This work is also separated into various, specific chapters for -en if one can manage to articulate liberal ideology even half as well countering pretty much any situation with a conservative. Ad- as Kurtzman, resistance would likely be futile. Even so, the book mittedly, this book, though a direct counterpart to the previous, doesn’t promote blind antagonism—though that isn’t to say that has much more material. Quotes are found throughout by many it doesn’t promote any antagonism. The name of the game is tact, well-known satirists, like Stephen Colbert. For instance, on page and Kurtzman is its master. As he puts it, “Build your street cred 39, Colbert is quoted for stating, “Reality has a well-known liberal with conservatives by bad-mouthing an annoying liberal—say, bias.” The commonly thought liberal media bias is an advantage Jesse Jackson or Rosie O’Donnell. That way you’ll defy stereotypes that Conservative has over Liberal, and this is a direct product of and demonstrate that your allegiances are not blind. Continue to the media environment in which we dwell. This book also tends rope them in by appealing to shared values and common interests to be much funnier than its counterpart, with jokes that are more before unleashing your Trojan horse–style sneak attack.” Once the controversial. For example: “What liberals say: I’m tired of listen- foe is appreciatively listening, then the time has come to pour on ing to religious nutcases and puritanical prudes trying to dictate the slanderous comments. Surely, the likening of Rudy Giuliani to what I do in the bedroom or what I can do with my body. What Newt Gingrich and their common adulterous ways would infuri- conservatives hear: I’m a godless, amoral hedonist. Where’s the ate most conservatives, which Kurtzman suggests as an argument nearest drive-through abortion clinic?” While edgy, jokes like this strategy. One should understand the opponent before attempting definitely get the attention of the reader. to argue. Both books have proven a great point—Kurtzman can argue on an extremely sophisticated level. The satire in each of these publications is exceptional and certainly deserves greater attention than it is currently receiving. The style of arguments and the tactics described mirror those that one would find in a class on the art of rhetoric and logic. Regardless of one’s political affiliations, all will find equal entertainment within these texts given one truth— that one is able to recognize flaws within their own reason and accept their shortcomings. Please, do open up and laugh heartily, for as Kurtzman says, “Partisan warfare has never been so much fun,” and, for the first time, both sides of the aisle will overwhelmingly agree. SUMMER 2012 | PENN POLITICAL REVIEW | 5 NATIONAL THE DAM STORY BY JONATHAN FRIED FLOWETH OVER CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM SCHOLARS LIKE TO date super PACs” run by former staffers, business partners, talk about the “hydrology problem” in politics; no matter how and advisors with close affiliations to parties and candidates. high you build the regulatory dam, money always finds a way Candidates have explicitly endorsed “their” super PACs and to flow through the cracks and into the system. The recent -ad even solicited money on their behalf. In short, super PACs of- vent of super PACs, however, has done more than create a few ten do coordinate with candidates, who can receive huge, po- cracks. By effectively allowing political candidates to receive tentially corrupting campaign contributions from wealthy unlimited campaign contributions through independent prox- donors and corporations. And since super PACs can receive ies, it has overwhelmed the whole dam in an opaque tsunami of donations from 501(c)(4) organizations, the true sources of money, raising serious corruption concerns. When super PACs these large donations are often hidden from public scrutiny. can change the course of an election, wealthy individuals and The end result of the potent combination of Citizens Unit- corporations can gain undue influence on the political process.