DOCSLIB.ORG

The Films of Oliver Stone

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Films of Oliver Stone H-Film ReFocus: The Films of Oliver Stone Discussion published by Elif Sendur on Tuesday, December 1, 2020 deadline for submissions: January 29, 2021 full name / name of organization: David Da Silva contact email: [email protected] ReFocus: The Films of Oliver Stone For many, Oliver Stone set the tone and pacing for the political film narrative in American cinema for nearly twenty years. First, we have to put Oliver Stone back in the current Hollywood system, a place a thousand leagues from where he occupied in the 80s and early 90s. Oliver Stone began as a screenwriter for filmmakers as John Milius (Conan the barbarian), Brian De Palma (Scarface), Michael Cimino (Year of the dragon) or Alan Parker (Midnight Express and an Oscar for best screenplay) before quickly becoming one of Hollywood's great filmmakers. Platoon, his fourth feature film after two low-budget films and Salvador with James Woods, won four Oscars including that of best film and best director. An unexpected triumph for a very personal film (Oliver Stone participated in the Vietnam War and this is a subject that is particularly important for him). The American filmmaker, who has French origins through his mother, has a series of successful films such as Wall Street, Born on the Fourth of July (which allows him to obtain a second Oscar for best director) or JFK. The turning point in his career was the public and critical failure of the last installment of his Vietnam trilogy (Heaven and Earth with Tommy Lee Jones). Oliver Stone's state of grace in Hollywood is over despite some modest box office successes (especially Any Given Sunday which saves his career from total wreck and even allows him to start his dream project on Alexander The Great). This book must demonstrate all the thematic and aesthetic richness of his work. We are particularly interested in interdisciplinary approaches that can illuminate the various aspects of the director’s work and visual style. This volume will undertake to address the entirety of his work. As this volume will be peer-reviewed and scholarly, chapters are to be written at a high academic level. Contributions could include – but are not limited to– the following topics: -American Politics (and its international reception) -Christian Figure - The Father Figure -Oliver Stone’s vision of Film Genre Citation: Elif Sendur. ReFocus: The Films of Oliver Stone. H-Film. 12-01-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/14467/discussions/6895104/refocus-films-oliver-stone Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Film -Oliver Stone and Cultural Studies -Oliver Stone and History -Violence -Influence of Joseph Campbell - Human ambivalence -Morality and transgression -Representations of masculinity and femininity -War and rebellion - Collaboration with other filmmakers (Brian De Palma, Michael Cimino…) -The individual opposing majority This anthology will be organized into thematic sections around these topics and others that emerge from submissions. We are open to works that focus on other topics as well and authors interested in pursuing other related lines of inquiry. Feel free to contact the editor with any questions you may have about the project and please share this announcement with colleagues whose work aligns with the focus of this volume. Submit a 300-500 words abstract of your proposed chapter contribution, a short bio and complete contact information to David Da Silva ([email protected]) by January 29, 2021. Essays included in the refereed anthology will be of approximately 6,000 to 8,000 words, referenced in Chicago endnote and American spellings. The Films of Oliver Stone will be one of the scholarly editions to be published by Edinburgh University Press in a new series of anthologies examining overlooked American film directors. Series editors are Robert Singer, Ph.D, Frances Smith, Ph.D.,. and Gary D. Rhodes, Ph.D. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/series-refocus-the-american-directo... Note: Acceptance of a proposed abstract does not guarantee the acceptance of the full chapter into the completed volume. Citation: Elif Sendur. ReFocus: The Films of Oliver Stone. H-Film. 12-01-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/14467/discussions/6895104/refocus-films-oliver-stone Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cinema of Oliver Stone
    Interviews Stone on Stone Between 2010 and 2014 we interviewed Oliver Stone on a number of occasions, either personally or in correspondence by email. He was always ready to engage with us, quite literally. Stone thrives on the cut- and- thrust of debate about his films, about himself and per- ceptions of him that have adorned media outlets around the world throughout his career – and, of course, about the state of America. What follows are transcripts from some of those interviews, with- out redaction. Stone is always at his most fascinating when a ques- tion leads him down a line of theory or thinking that can expound on almost any topic to do with his films, or with the issues in the world at large. Here, that line of thinking appears on the page as he spoke, and gives credence to the notion of a filmmaker who, whether loved or loathed, admired or admonished, is always ready to fight his corner and battle for what he believes is a worthwhile, even noble, cause. Oliver Stone’s career has been defined by battle and the will to overcome criticism and or adversity. The following reflections demonstrate why he remains the most talked about, and combative, filmmaker of his generation. Interview with Oliver Stone, 19 January 2010 In relation to the Classification and Ratings Administration Interviewer: How do you see the issue of cinematic censorship? Oliver Stone: The ratings thing is very much a limited game. If you talk to Joan Graves, you’ll get the facts. The rules are the rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Invasion Der Barbaren Gedanken Zur Re-Mythisierung Hollywoods in Den 1980Er-Jahren
    Die Invasion der Barbaren Gedanken zur Re-Mythisierung Hollywoods in den 1980er-Jahren Marcus Stiglegger, Berlin 1. Wenn ich zurückdenke an das Jahr 1982 – ich war gerade 11 Jahre alt –, muss ich sagen, dass Conan für kurze Zeit zu meinem Mentor wurde. Ich durfte den Film mit Arnold Schwar- zenegger damals noch nicht sehen und sammelte daher verzweifelt alle Artikel über John Milius’ CONAN THE BARBARIAN (1982), die ich finden konnte. So kaufte ich mein erstes Cinema-Heft und meine erste Bravo-Ausgabe, denn beide berichteten ausführlich über den archaischen Barbaren. Und welche Freude war es, als der Heyne Verlag mit seiner Veröf- fentlichung der Conan-Stories und -Romane begann, die jeweils mit einem Filmfoto auf dem Cover erschienen. Diese blassgelben Buchrücken schmücken noch heute mein Lesezimmer. Conan kam damals zur richtigen Zeit: mit der wachsenden Popularität von J. R. R. Tolkiens Herr der Ringe-Romantrilogie und dem gleichnamigen Animationsfilm von Ralph Bakshi aus dem Jahr 1979, mit John Boormans 1981 gestarteter Neuinterpretation des Arthus-Mythos’ in EXCALIBUR und Terry Gilliams TIME BANDITS (1981). Es folgten THE DRAGON SLAYER (1982) von Matthew Robbins, FIRE AND ICE (1983) von Ralph Bakshi, THE DARK CRYSTAL (1982) von Jim Hanson und Frank Oz, LEGEND (1983) von Ridley Scott und aus Deutsch- land DIE UNENDLICHE GESCHICHTE (1984) von Wolfgang Petersen. Und nicht nur das Kino feierte die Phantasie, auch das Table-Top-Rollenspiel Dungeons & Dragons hatte damals eine Hochphase. Tolkiens Mittelerde hatte sich bereits in der Hippie-Ära der frühen 1970er-Jahre großer Beliebtheit erfreut, Studierendenkreise ebenso inspiriert wie esoterische Beschäfti- gung angestoßen. Pen-and-Paper-Rollenspiele etablierten sich als Gruppenerlebnis, und schon in den 1970er-Jahren musste man von einem Revival jener Fantasy-Literatur sprechen, die eigentlich einer anderen Ära entstammte: den krisengeplagten 1930er-Jahren mit ihren ‚Weird Tales‘ und weiteren frühen Fantasy-Magazinen.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Hollywood Films
    The New Hollywood Films The following is a chronological list of those films that are generally considered to be "New Hollywood" productions. Shadows (1959) d John Cassavetes First independent American Film. Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966) d. Mike Nichols Bonnie and Clyde (1967) d. Arthur Penn The Graduate (1967) d. Mike Nichols In Cold Blood (1967) d. Richard Brooks The Dirty Dozen (1967) d. Robert Aldrich Dont Look Back (1967) d. D.A. Pennebaker Point Blank (1967) d. John Boorman Coogan's Bluff (1968) – d. Don Siegel Greetings (1968) d. Brian De Palma 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) d. Stanley Kubrick Planet of the Apes (1968) d. Franklin J. Schaffner Petulia (1968) d. Richard Lester Rosemary's Baby (1968) – d. Roman Polanski The Producers (1968) d. Mel Brooks Bullitt (1968) d. Peter Yates Night of the Living Dead (1968) – d. George Romero Head (1968) d. Bob Rafelson Alice's Restaurant (1969) d. Arthur Penn Easy Rider (1969) d. Dennis Hopper Medium Cool (1969) d. Haskell Wexler Midnight Cowboy (1969) d. John Schlesinger The Rain People (1969) – d. Francis Ford Coppola Take the Money and Run (1969) d. Woody Allen The Wild Bunch (1969) d. Sam Peckinpah Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice (1969) d. Paul Mazursky Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid (1969) d. George Roy Hill They Shoot Horses, Don't They? (1969) – d. Sydney Pollack Alex in Wonderland (1970) d. Paul Mazursky Catch-22 (1970) d. Mike Nichols MASH (1970) d. Robert Altman Love Story (1970) d. Arthur Hiller Airport (1970) d. George Seaton The Strawberry Statement (1970) d.
    [Show full text]
  • It's a Conspiracy
    IT’S A CONSPIRACY! As a Cautionary Remembrance of the JFK Assassination—A Survey of Films With A Paranoid Edge Dan Akira Nishimura with Don Malcolm The only culture to enlist the imagination and change the charac- der. As it snows, he walks the streets of the town that will be forever ter of Americans was the one we had been given by the movies… changed. The banker Mr. Potter (Lionel Barrymore), a scrooge-like No movie star had the mind, courage or force to be national character, practically owns Bedford Falls. As he prepares to reshape leader… So the President nominated himself. He would fill the it in his own image, Potter doesn’t act alone. There’s also a board void. He would be the movie star come to life as President. of directors with identities shielded from the public (think MPAA). Who are these people? And what’s so wonderful about them? —Norman Mailer 3. Ace in the Hole (1951) resident John F. Kennedy was a movie fan. Ironically, one A former big city reporter of his favorites was The Manchurian Candidate (1962), lands a job for an Albu- directed by John Frankenheimer. With the president’s per- querque daily. Chuck Tatum mission, Frankenheimer was able to shoot scenes from (Kirk Douglas) is looking for Seven Days in May (1964) at the White House. Due to a ticket back to “the Apple.” Pthe events of November 1963, both films seem prescient. He thinks he’s found it when Was Lee Harvey Oswald a sleeper agent, a “Manchurian candidate?” Leo Mimosa (Richard Bene- Or was it a military coup as in the latter film? Or both? dict) is trapped in a cave Over the years, many films have dealt with political conspira- collapse.
    [Show full text]
  • Oliver Stone Et Woody Allen Sèment Le Bonheur Sur La Croisette
    Culture / Culture FESTIVAL DE CANNES Oliver Stone et Woody Allen sèment le bonheur sur la Croisette Les deux cinéastes américains, Oliver Stone et Woody Allen, qui ont présenté leur dernier film, respectivement, Wall Street : l'argent ne dort jamais, suite du filmWall Street, sorti en 1988, et You will meet a tall dark stranger, les deux présentés en Hors Compétition, ont ravi la vedette aux cinéastes en lice pour la plus haute distinction du festival : la Palme d'or. Commençons par Oliver Stone. Fidèle à lui-même, et toujours à l'avant-garde, il a exploré et dénoncé la dictature impitoyable de l'argent, imposée par les spéculateurs et grands banquiers de Wall Street. “Aléa moral, subprimes, intérêt, taux, bulle…” sont autant de mots barbares qui reviennent sans cesse dans le film. Pour rendre accessible ce monde complexe, il a imaginé une trame narrative simple et captivante. Il a mis en scène un jeune trader qui tente d'alerter le monde au sujet des dangers irréversibles de la spéculation financière. Dans le même temps, il cherche à venger la mort de son mentor, ruiné et poussé au suicide. L'une des remarques importantes que l'on puisse souligner est l'omniprésence des écrans, télévision et ordinateurs compris, quasiment propulsés au rang de personnages. Une présence qui permet la dénonciation de la sainte alliance entre le monde de la communication et celui de la finance qui rend le monde réduit à des bulles éphémères, davantage fragile et instable. Certains ont reproché au film sa fin quelque peu heureuse à la manière d'un conte.
    [Show full text]
  • Apocalypse Now
    Sabrina Baiguera Università degli Studi di Bergamo Letteratura Anglo-americana LMI A.A. 2011/2012 Paolo Jachia’s Francis Ford Coppola: Apocalypse Now. Un’analisi semiotica , an intertextual reconstruction of the texts, of the cultural references that lie behind the film. Apocalypse Now (1979) Two versions: the orginal version (1979) and the extended version ( Apocalypse Now Redux: 2001 ), released in 2001. The film is set during the Vietnam war (the action takes place approximately in 1970) It tells the story of U.S. Army Captain Benjamin L. Willard who has the mission to proceed up the Nung river into Cambodia, find Colonel Kurtz and “terminate” his command, by whatever means available. Willard starts a journey up the Nung river on a PBR (Petrol Boat) with a four- man crew (Chef – a saucier; Chief – the chief of the boat; Clean – a 17 year- old young from Bronx; Lance – a professional surfer). Kurtz had deserted the U.S. Army to start his own private war in the middle of the jungle. There he is worshipped as a god by his own Montagnard army, but he has gone insane and his methods are “unsound”. The artistic dimension Source texts of Apocalypse Now : 1. Joseph Conrad’s novella Heart of Darkness (1899) 2. James G. Frazer’s The Golden Bough (1890) 3. Jessie Weston’s From ritual to romance (1920) 4. Goethe’s Faust (1808) 5. The Holy Bible 6. T.S.Eliot’s The Waste Land (1922) and The Hollow Men (1925) 7. Baudelaire’s The Albatross (1861) 8. The Doors’ The End Heart of Darkness (1899) “In the case of “Apocalypse,” there was a script written by the great John Milius, but, I must say, what I really made the film from was the little green copy of Heart of Darkness that I had done all those lines in.” (Coppola) Heart of Darkness was not credited as a source text when the film first came out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cinema of Oliver Stone
    Conclusion Although we are clearly overreaching, it’s too easy to talk about the USA losing its grip because we happen to be rooting for another approach. It’s not going to go away that easily. This empire is Star Wars in the ‘evil empire’ sense of the words … We are virtually becoming a tyranny against the rest of the world. It’s not evident to people at home, because they don’t see the consensus in the media and they don’t see the harm the USA does abroad. We are not in decline. We are decayed and corrupt and immoral, but not in decline. The USA exerts its will in Europe, Asia, much of the Middle East, and still much of Latin America. The recent revela- tions that the NSA’s and the UK’s surveillance programmes are linked is big news.1 Oliver Stone has been a fixture in the Hollywood landscape since his Oscar- winning script for Midnight Express (Alan Parker, 1978). That high-profile foothold gave him the opportunity to build slowly towards his ambition of capturing on film what he had lived through in Vietnam during 1967 and 1968. The young Yale man who had entered the army was a cerebral romantic in search of adventure; but his experience, not just of combat but also of his return to a country that was already openly divided about the war, altered his perspective and the direction of his life. Enrolment at film school under the GI Bill seemed to offer a way of expressing his anger and disillusionment, and the same determination that had kept him alive in South-East Asia now drove him on to try and tell something of that experience on film.
    [Show full text]
  • APOCALYPSE NOW REDUX Written by John Milius & Francis Ford
    APOCALYPSE NOW REDUX Written by John Milius & Francis Ford Coppola FADE IN: EXT. A SIMPLE IMAGE OF TREES - DAY Coconut trees being VIEWED through the veil of time or a dream. Occasionally colored smoke wafts through the FRAME, yellow and then violet. MUSIC begins quietly, suggestive of 1968-69. Perhaps "The End" by the Doors. Now MOVING through the FRAME are skids of helicopters, not that we could make them out as that though; rather, hard shapes that glide by at random. Then a phantom helicopter in FULL VIEW floats by the trees-suddenly without warning, the jungle BURSTS into a bright red-orange glob of napalm flame. The VIEW MOVES ACROSS the burning trees as the smoke ghostly helicopters come and go. DISSOLVE TO: INT. SAIGON HOTEL - DAY A CLOSE SHOT, upside down of the stubble-covered face of a young man. His EYES OPEN...this is B.L. WILLARD. Intense and dissipated. The CAMERA MOVES around to a side view as he continues to look up at a ROTATING FAN on the ceiling. EXT. IMAGES OF HELICOPTERS - DAY They continue to fly slowly, peacefully across the burning jungle. The colored smoke comes and goes. Morrison continues with "The End". INT. SAIGON HOTEL - DAY The CAMERA MOVES slowly across the room...and we SEE WILLARD, a young army captain. He looks out the window to the busy Saigon street. WILLARD (V.O.) * Saigon...shit. I'm only in Saigon. Every time, I think I'm gonna wake up back in the jungle. He moves back to the bed, lies down.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Penn's Bonnie and Clyde
    Arthur Penn’s Bonnie and Clyde Edited by LESTER D. FRIEDMAN Syracuse University PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA http://www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarco´n 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain ᭧ Cambridge University Press 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Stone Serif 10/14 pt. System DeskTopPro/UX [BV] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data Arthur Penn’s Bonnie and Clyde / edited by Lester D. Friedman. p. cm. – (Cambridge film handbooks series) Filmography: p. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-521-59295-X – ISBN 0-521-59697-1 (pbk.) 1. Bonnie and Clyde (Motion picture) I. Friedman, Lester D. II. Series. PN1997.B6797 1999 791.43'72 – dc21 98-32173 CIP ISBN 0 521 59295 X hardback ISBN 0 521 59697 1 paperback LESTER D. FRIEDMAN Introduction ARTHUR PENN’S ENDURING GANGSTERS HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES: COUNTERCULTURAL CINEMA Boy meets girl in small-town Texas. Their crime spree begins as girl goads boy into robbing a grocery store; they speed out of town in a stolen car, spirits high.
    [Show full text]
  • The Picture of Abjection: Film, Fetish, and the Nature of Difference
    The Picture of Abjection: Film, Fetish, and the Nature of Difference By Tina Chanter Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008. ISBN: 9780253219183. 15 illustrations, 377 pp. £19.99 (pbk) A review by Adrienne Angelo, Angelo, University of West Georgia, USA How do scholars and others with an interest in film studies and psychoanalysis engage with existing theoretical discourses on race, gender, culture and sexual difference in order to bypass the often polemicized and contested paradigm of fetishism and voyeurism, two critical modes that have dominated and continue to dominate film theory? It is this problematic that Tina Chanter explores in The Picture of Abjection: Film, Fetish and the Nature of Difference. For Chanter, drawing largely upon Kristeva's theoretical considerations of abjection, a point of entry to this endeavor lies precisely in further developing the implications of abjection as a "staging of a defensive dynamic that has the potential to significantly rework the imaginary commitments of Oedipal theory, specifically its privileging of masculinity and femininity" (17). Chanter's primary goal appears to be to develop a new critical model at the very center of which lies that which is otherwise neglected, excluded and expelled from dominant cultural discourse for being "too much", too "other". However, for as much as Chanter promotes a consideration of film and film theory, there is less an in-depth reading of films per se than a highly informed reconsideration of theoretical notions of subjectivity and the subject, one read through the lens of abjection and its destabilizing and thus subversive potential for considering marginalized identities and their representation in film theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF!
    Arts & Entertainment Tom Petty grows with Wild flowers Oliver Stone's "Nixon" By Shereen Kinney this song; a quality all it'sowh. A definite repeater. "You Wreck Me," also a released single from You don't know how itfeels to endure the success Wildflowers, is certain to keep the listener tufted in LA (AP)-Director Oliver Stone, who caused a stir in the an artist like Tom Petty has, but you can'experiehce fofmore of it's same faskpaeed drums anddrescen- past for his controversial handling of the assassination of a fine product of his which exemplifies his great dos and decrescendos, If you can listen to this song President Kennedy, is responding in kind to the multiple crit­ talent and mastery of creativity. without tapping your feet or playing a little an gui^ ics taking aim at his upcoming movie "Nixon;" Wildflowers, the latest from Petty, could be con­ tar or drums you'd better have you pulse checked. "The sensationalized stories on 'Nixon,' based on very sidered a 15-traek signature of the singer's self and On a softer note, Petty sprinklers few nice early drafts of the script, totally misrepresent the film we musical expertise. From ballads to hard hitting cuts, sounding ballads throughout the CD. "Only A Bro­ are trying to make," Said Stone, whose Academy Award- Tom Petty hides nothing on his latest Warner Broth­ ken Heart," "Crawling'Back to You," and: "Wake nominated "JFK" explored a conspiracy theory in the as­ ers release. Up Timei" are all Slower cuts that should not be sassination of President Kennedy.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN BLAKE Make-Up Artist IATSE 706
    JOHN BLAKE Make-Up Artist IATSE 706 FILM UNTITLED AVENGERS MOVIE Department Head Marvel Studios Director: Joe and Anthony Russo Cast: Robert Downey Jr., Elizabeth Olsen, Cobie Smulders, Paul Bettany, Haley Atwell AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR Department Head Marvel Studios Director: Joe and Anthony Russo Cast: Robert Downey Jr., Elizabeth Olsen, Cobie Smulders, Paul Bettany SPIDER-MAN HOMECOMING Personal Make-Up Artist to Robert Downey Jr. Columbia Pictures Director: John Watts GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 2 Department Head Marvel Studios Director: James Gunn Cast: Sylvester Stallone, Kurt Russell, Elizabeth Debicki, Sean Gunn, Tommy Flanagan, Laura Haddock, Glenn Close, Sharon Stone Nominated: Saturn Award for Best Make-Up Nominated: Hollywood Make-Up Artist and Hair Stylist Guild Awards for Best Special Make-Up effects – Feature length Motion Picture Nominated: OFTA Film Award for Best Make-Up and Hairstyling Nominated: ACCA for Best Make-Up and Hairstyling CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR Department Head & Marvel Studios Personal Make-Up Artist to Robert Downey Jr. Directors: Anthony Russo, Joe Russo Cast: Robert Downey Jr., Chadwick Boseman, Paul Bettany, Emily VanCamp, Frank Grillo JANE GOT A GUN Personal Make-Up Artist to Natalie Portman and Relativity Media Joel Edgerton Director: Gavin O’Connor AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON Personal Make-Up Artist to Robert Downey Jr. Marvel Studios Director: Joss Whedon THE JUDGE Personal Make-Up Artist to Robert Downey Jr. Warner Bros. Director: David Dobkin IRON MAN 3 Personal Make-Up Artist to Robert Downey
    [Show full text]