DOCSLIB.ORG

Bicycle Parking Needs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bicycle Parking Needs Final Recommendations FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS OVERVIEW This section of the study recommends the imple- BICYCLE LOCKERS mentation of expanded bicycle parking in New York City to best serve the needs of potential • Bicycle Lockers offer protection against commuter cyclists. The recommendations build theft, vandalism and weather. They serve on research compiled and presented in the Lit- typically as user-assigned, long-term park- erature Review and Existing Conditions sections ing facilities, installed at work and school in this study. Following is a summary list of the destinations and at transit stations for inter- recommendations: modal connections. To encourage bicycle use as part of intermodal commuting in New ON-STREET BICYCLE PARKING York City, installation of bicycle lockers at the three major transit hubs - Grand Central • In areas with a dense concentration of com- Station, Pennsylvania Station and The Port mercial and retail space such as midtown Authority Bus Terminal - is recommended. Manhattan, where space for on-street bicycle parking is limited, new space should be created for such facilities. Space could be BIKE STATIONS developed by widening sidewalks at both mid-block and end-block locations. • Bike stations are attended, centralized loca- tions for short and long term parking that • Where parking for more than two bicycles is usually feature a combination of the follow- required, the NYCDOT CityRacks program ing services: bike rental, bike repair, acces- should substitute use of the “Wave” rack for sory sales, food vending, shower and change an alternate design that supports the bicycle facilities and tourist and travel information. in two places. Also, use of the “U” shaped Bike Stations should be implemented in lo- rack should be augmented by use of the cations where they will facilitate intermodal “Hitching Post” style rack. connections and/or access to areas with a high concentration of workplaces. In ad- • Where space is available, the installation of dition to the three major transit hubs, four CityRacks should be accompanied by the recommended locations for a bike station installation of a protective canopy that of- in New York are Wall Street near the corner fers shelter from the weather. Such a shelter of South Street, the World Trade Center could be modeled after the New York City complex, the intersection of Broadway and bus shelter. In addition to weather protection, Houston Street and the southeast corner of such a shelter would offer the advantage of Union Square Park. raised public awareness. 27 Bicycle Parking Needs LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCES mine the quantity of bicycle parking spaces required; identify the most suitable means • The NYC Zoning Resolution should be of accommodating projected parking needs; amended to require bicycle parking in con- select a convenient location for a centralized junction with the construction and opera- parking facility if required; plan, design and tion of all new, and continued operation of construct the bicycle parking facility. The all existing, off-street parking facilities in encouragement campaign should also point Manhattan south of 96th Street. Any resolu- out resources from which assistance for the tion should, at a minimum, identify the class planning, design and funding of such facili- and/or type of bicycle parking facility, the ties may be obtained. minimum number of bicycles to be accom- modated and guidelines regarding placement of and access to said facilities. • New York City Council Member Adolfo Car- rion Jr.’s proposed amendment to the New York City Administrative Code to require building owners, citywide, to permit bicycle access to buildings with freight elevators, should be carefully reviewed by the City Council. It is recommended that the leg- islation include language that limit bicycle access to persons who live or work in the particular building. • The City of New York should amend the Mu- nicipal Code to allow municipal employees who work in City owned or leased buildings to bring their bicycles into the building. Such an amendment should identify the class and/or type of bicycle parking facility, the minimum number of bicycles to be accom- modated and guidelines regarding placement of and access to said facilities. ENCOURAGEMENT • The City of New York Department of Transportation should undertake a compre- hensive public outreach campaign designed to encourage private property owners to provide safe, secure off-street bicycle park- ing facilities at/within their buildings. The campaign should recommend that building owners: survey building tenants to deter- 28 Final Recommendations ON-STREET BICYCLE PARKING It is not uncommon to see bikes locked to newspaper vending boxes, trash receptacles and Introduction sometimes even the traffi c signal control boxes On-street bicycle racks, typically placed on city that are typically clustered together at many New sidewalks near the curb, are used by a variety York City street corners. of commuting cyclists including messengers, delivery people and shoppers. Friends visiting friends, students attending a class, and people running small errands also make use of the racks. At subway stations, particularly the Bedford Avenue L train stop in Brooklyn, a growing number of bicycles can be found locked to the CityRacks provided, the subway entrance railing and adjacent sign poles illustrating growth in the number of commuters using their bicycles to travel between home and the subway en-route to Manhattan. Bedford Avenue Subway Entrance Bicycle Chained to Tree Bicycle racks are only as useful, however, as they are available. Where they are not available, a suitable substitute, and a favorite among New Yorkers, is the ubiquitous green drive rail (the steel channel shaped pole) to which curbside parking regulation signs are attached. When no rack or drive rail is at hand, bikes typically get locked to any fi xed object which permits the frame and/or at least one wheel of the bike to be locked to it. This leads to bicycles being locked up to inappropriate objects such as trees and in inappropriate locations where they may present a nuisance to pedestrians. Bicycle Chained to Hydrant 29 Bicycle Parking Needs Though newspaper vending boxes and trash point allowing bikes to rotate about that point receptacles may already be considered an in- and eventually fall down. convenience where pedestrian volumes are high and sidewalk space limited, the addition Where bicycle parking for more than two bicy- of a chained bicycle can render a corner haz- cles is required, an alternate rack design should ardous. Clearly, there are areas in Manhattan be chosen or two or more ‘U’ shaped bicycle where suffi cient on-street bicycle parking is not racks can be placed side by side. Further, the provided. ‘U’ rack should be augmented with ‘Hitching Post’ style racks (see Figures 1-8). The hitching post is more versatile by design, has a wide fl at bar on which something may be written such as ‘Bicycle Parking’ and may prove a more attrac- tive alternative to the ‘U’ rack. Bicycle at Street Corner NYCDOT CityRacks Program As was described on page 63 of the Literature Crowded CityRack at Union Squre Review section, the City of New York Depart- ment of Transportation (CDOT) maintains the CityRacks program. The CityRacks program An additional alternative for bicycle park- installs “U” shaped (2 bicycles) and “Wave” ing are tree guards serving also as bike racks. shaped (3, 5 or 7 bicycles) steel bicycle racks While such designs protect the tree, they can within the public right-of-way in response to also provide better support for the bicycle and public request and based on the Departments allow the use of the popular U-shaped locks. own fi eld research. The racks are free standing Although trees in parks are usually not fenced and are typically attached directly to the side- by tree guards, it should be considered as op- walk with expansion bolts and/or epoxy. The tion for trees on sidewalks and boulevards. racks offer no protection from the weather. Location - Locations where CityRacks may Design - A successful bicycle rack design must be placed are limited to areas where suffi cient be able to support a bicycle that can not oth- clearances allow unimpeded pedestrian circu- erwise stand by itself. The ‘U’ shaped rack, lation when the rack is in use (see the Appendix used by the CDOT CityRacks program, sup- C for the CityRacks siting guidelines). ports a bicycle at two points. The ‘Wave’ rack, however, used to accommodate more than two bicycles, supports bicycles at only one contact 30 Final Recommendations Racks are never installed on sidewalks less In an effort to keep the cost of constructing such than 10’-0” wide. This requirement, while nec- sidewalk extensions to a minimum, priority essary, severely limits the number of eligible should be given to locations that do not require locations, particularly in midtown and lower the reconstruction of drainage structures or the Manhattan, where daytime pedestrian volumes relocation of fi re hydrants. Additional siting on local sidewalks often exceed capacity. guidelines should be developed to ensure that racks are not placed directly opposite either the While a comprehensive study should be under- main or the service entrances to buildings. taken to identify locations in midtown and low- er Manhattan where CityRacks may be placed, Shelter - Presumably, although CityRacks do it is anticipated that an insuffi cient number of get used to a certain extent by individuals who locations will be identifi ed to fully satisfy de- commute to work by bike and store their bike at mand. The creation of new space for bicycle the rack all day, the City’s high rate of bicycle parking should, therefore, be investigated. theft combined with the racks lack of protec- tion from the weather, renders them best suited Widened sidewalks, at both mid-block and to trips of relatively short duration made on end-block locations, could provide the room relatively inexpensive bicycles.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to Operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas
    MEETING DATE: April 17, 2019 PREPARED BY: Crystal Najera, CAP DEPT. DIRECTOR: Karen P. Brust Program Administrator DEPARTMENT: City Manager CITY MANAGER: Karen P. Brust SUBJECT: License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, to execute a license agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC (in substantial form as attached) to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas (Attachment 5). STRATEGIC PLAN: This item is related to the following Strategic Plan focus areas: • Environment—promotes the use of emissions-free bicycles as an alternative mode of transportation. • Transportation—supports a transportation mode that accommodates more people with minimal impact on the community. • Recreation—promotes active lifestyles and community health. • Economic Development—addresses the “last mile” gap between public transit and local businesses and promotes tourism. FISCAL CONSIDERATIONS: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendation. Gotcha will bear the sole cost of deploying and operating the bike share program. Minimal City staff time will be needed to coordinate with Gotcha to ensure that the program operates in a manner beneficial to the City. BACKGROUND: Bike share is a service through which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a very short-term basis, allowing them to rent a bicycle at one location and return it either at the same location or at a different location within a defined geographic boundary. Transportation, especially travel via single occupancy vehicle, is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions in Encinitas and the North County coastal region.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Del Mar Staff Report
    City of Del Mar Staff Report TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Clem Brown, Environmental Sustainability/Special Projects Manager Via Scott Huth, City Manager DATE: May 6, 2019 SUBJECT: License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to Operate the North County Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Del Mar REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the City Council approve a license agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC (Attachment A) to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Del Mar and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: The City of Del Mar is committed to reducing local greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to limit the effects of climate change, while also offering viable transportation alternatives to driving. Del Mar has adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that establishes a number of strategies to meet GHG emissions reduction targets, including facilitating safe, convenient, and affordable alternative transportation options. Specifically, Goal 14 in the CAP includes a strategy to “explore implementation of a bike share program…to provide another transportation alternative for traveling in town.” Transportation, especially travel via single occupancy vehicles, is a major source of GHG emissions in Del Mar and the other north San Diego County (North County) coastal cities. Offering and promoting programs like bike share, that replace vehicle trips with bike trips, is one way Del Mar can help to reduce emissions while offering more efficient and more affordable transportation modes for residents, employees, and visitors. Bike share is a service by which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a very short-term basis, allowing them to borrow a bicycle at one location and return it either to the same or an alternate location within a defined geographic boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 31Netherlands1.Pdf
    Programma Media Tour Bicycle (October, 26-31, 2014) Participants: Mr. Avraham Ganor, Ofanaim Magazine Mr. Barry Davis, Jerusalem Post Mr. Jonathan Lemze. MAKO Online Mr. Meiri Doron Menashe, Yedioth Achronot Mr. Tuvi Pollack, Megafon Weather forecast: Day Max Min %Sun rain Wind Mo 27 oct 15°C 10°C 50% 0 mm SW 3 Bft Tue 28 oct 16°C 10°C 50% 2 mm SSW 4 Bft Wed 29 oct 14°C 11°C 10% 2 mm SW 3 Bft Thurs 30 oct 14°C 10°C 30% 2 mm SSW 4 Bft Fri 31 oct 14°C 10°C 50% 2 mm SSW3 Bft Suggestion: Bring a sweater and a Coat! The tour will be accompanied by: Mrs. Jeannette Barbier Mrs. Channa Nieuwenweg Holland Branding Innovation and Public Diplomacy Netherlands Enterprise Agency Dutch Embassy in Israel T: +31629553206 1 Holland is world's cycling leader The Netherlands is the world's number one cycling country. Cycling is a major means of transportation there, serving as a sustainable, healthy and economical mobility solution. The Netherlands has vast bike-friendly infrastructure that makes cycling a practical and safe way to get around. It also has some of the most innovative bicycle technology and bike manufacturers. It's no wonder that countries around the world are calling on the Netherlands for cycling expertise and technology. Cycling is a way of life in Holland. In fact, there are more bikes than people. The 16 million Dutch inhabitants own 18 million bicycles, most of which are made in Holland. Cycling is big business in Holland; more than 1 billion euros was spent on bicycles and cycling infrastructure in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Poised for Pedaling: Comparing Bicycle
    POISED FOR PEDALING: COMPARING BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE IN COPENHAGEN, DENMARK AND PORTLAND, OREGON by SEAN VERMILYA A THESIS Presented to the Department of Planning, Public Policy, and Management and the Robert D. Clark Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science June 2020 An Abstract of the Thesis of Sean Vermilya for the degree of Bachelor of Science in the Department of Planning, Public Policy, and Management to be taken June 2020 Title: Poised for Pedaling: Comparing Bicycle Infrastructure in Copenhagen, Denmark and Portland, Oregon Approved: Marc Schlossberg Primary Thesis Advisor This thesis investigates the following question: how can Portland learn from Copenhagen’s policy successes and failures to better develop, implement, and utilize bicycle infrastructure going forward? The thesis begins by addressing each city’s mobility history and how that history contributes to current transportation networks. Historical cycling support helps explain Copenhagen’s strong network today, while the US’s embrace of the automobile prevented Portland from fully embracing the bicycle. The thesis then deconstructs the differences between bicycle infrastructure in Copenhagen and Portland along five focus areas: design, municipal control, societal values, current politics, and equity. Copenhagen’s cyclist-friendly design, egalitarian societal values, and strong social safety net contribute to its superior cycling network and bring more cyclists to the streets. These advantages serve as models for Portland for emulate. However, the cities’ common struggles with municipal infrastructure control and mobility politics demonstrate cycling’s divisive nature regardless of locale. They also show that improvement remains well within Portland’s reach.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlicensed Dockless Bike Sharing
    UNLICENSED DOCKLESS BIKE SHARING – COMMON POSITION PAPER – INTRODUCTION This common position of the International Association of Public Transport (UITP), the European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF) and its Platform for European Bike Sharing and Systems (PEBSS), recognises that there are currently significant changes happening in the operation, technology and business models of bike sharing systems. Over the past decade, station-based bike sharing has been successfully introduced to many cities worldwide, encouraging more cycling and promoting more healthy and liveable cities. While the environmental benefits of docked bike sharing is clear, the high implementation and operation costs have deterred some cities from embracing these schemes that promote the benefits of active travel. The introduction of smart bikes allows for dockless operation, which involves lighter infrastructure at a lower cost. We have recently seen the emergence of privately funded dockless bike sharing systems, operating without public licensing. This has a variety of implications for a city’s transport policy. This paper provides a framework and recommendations for cities and relevant authorities to ensure dockless bike sharing schemes contribute to the objectives of a wider sustainable urban mobility policy and efficiently complement public transport. Active mobility such as cycling and walking is crucial to any sustainable urban mobility strategy based on a high quality public transport system for more liveable and healthier cities. New wave of unlicensed dockless bike parking areas so that another rider can find share operators or locate it for the next ride. Since spring 2016, there has been a dramatic increase, primarily in China, of un- anchored, free-floating and app-controlled private bike share operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Bicycle Commuting in the Washington, DC Region: the Role of Bicycle Parking, Cyclist Showers, and Free Car Parking at Work
    Transportation Research Part D 17 (2012) 525–531 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Transportation Research Part D journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/trd Determinants of bicycle commuting in the Washington, DC region: The role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, and free car parking at work Ralph Buehler Urban Affairs and Planning, Virginia Tech, Alexandria Center, 1021 Prince Street, Room 228, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA article info abstract Keywords: This article examines the role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, free car parking and tran- Bicycling to work sit benefits as determinants of cycling to work. The analysis is based on commute data of Bicycle parking workers in the Washington, DC area. Results of rare events logistic regressions indicate that Car parking bicycle parking and cyclist showers are related to higher levels of bicycle commuting—even Cyclist showers when controlling for other explanatory variables. The odds for cycling to work are greater Trip-end facilities for employees with access to both cyclist showers and bike parking at work compared to those with just bike parking, but no showers at work. Free car parking at work is associated with 70% smaller odds for bike commuting. Employer provided transit commuter benefits appear to be unrelated to bike commuting. Regression coefficients for control variables have expected signs, but not all are statistically significant. Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Over the last decades US cities have increasingly promoted bicycle commuting to reduce local and global air pollution, combat peak hour traffic congestion, and achieve health benefits from physical activity (Alliance for Biking and Walking, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Why Shared Bikes of Free-Floating Systems Were Parked out of Order? a Preliminary Study Based on Factor Analysis
    sustainability Article Why Shared Bikes of Free-Floating Systems Were Parked Out of Order? A Preliminary Study based on Factor Analysis Qianling Jiang 1 , Sheng-Jung Ou 2 and Wei Wei 2,* 1 School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214000, China; [email protected] 2 School of Design, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 41349, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 May 2019; Accepted: 12 June 2019; Published: 14 June 2019 Abstract: Free-floating bicycle-sharing systems are an important component of sustainable transport. China’s bicycle-sharing schemes have experienced ups and downs in the past three years, and there are a lot of related studies, but there are relatively few studies on the causes of disorderly parking of shared bikes. In this study, an open questionnaire is used to widely collect the causes of the disorderly parking of shared bicycles from users. Through factor analysis, six factors and 32 criteria for the causes of disorderly parking are constructed. Factor 1 ‘supervision and management of enterprises’; factor 2 ‘supervision and management of users’; factor 3 ‘parking space’; factor 4 ‘guidance of parking shared bikes’; factor 5 ‘user self-discipline’; factor 6 ‘operation and maintenance’. It requires the cooperation of multiple parties to solve the problem of disorderly parking of shared bicycles. Keywords: Free-Floating Bike-sharing Systems; causes of disorderly parking; factor analysis 1. Introduction As global warming intensifies, countries around the world have begun to save energy and reduce emissions to slow down global warming. At the Copenhagen Summit (2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference), the Chinese government made commitment to reduce carbon emissions and then opened the curtain for sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Short-Term Bicycle Parking Requirements Short Term Bicycle Parking Requirements Use Type Required Bicycle Parking Spaces
    Chapter 7 | PROGRAM & POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Bicycle Parking Recommendations by Land Use The City of Billings should require bicycle parking by land use, and type of parking. The following suggestions may be incorporated into existing City Municipal Code either within Section 24-601 or as an attachment to the table in Section 6-1203. Off-street parking requirements. Short Term Bicycle Parking - Bicycle parking meant to accommodate visitors, customers, and others expected to depart within two hours. Standard bicycle racks are typically employed as short-term parking. Table 7.5 – Recommended Short-Term Bicycle Parking Requirements Short Term Bicycle Parking Requirements Use Type Required Bicycle Parking Spaces Warehouses, and freight terminals 1 per 5,000 sq ft of floor space Wholesale business 10 percent of required auto parking Food or beverage places with sale and consumption on 10 percent of required auto parking premises Motor vehicle, machinery, plumbing, heating, ventilating, building The greater of 2 or 20 percent of required auto parking material supplies, sales and services Retirement homes and housing projects for the elderly which 1 per 4 employees have received a declaratory ruling from the Montana Human Rights Commission allowing sale or lease of the units exclusively to persons sixty (60) years of age or older Motel and motor courts 1 per 10 rooms Hotels 1 per 10 rooms Hospitals (with less than 100 beds based upon state licensed bed 15 percent of required auto parking count) and institutions Hospitals (with over 100 beds
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Bike Rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft
    Transdanube.Pearls - Network for Sustainable Mobility along the Danube http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Guideline for bike rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft WP/Action 3.1 Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Version/Date 3.0, 23.11.2017 Document Revision/Approval Version Date Status Date Status 3.0 23/11/2017 Final draft xx.xx.xxxx final Contacts Coordinator: Bratislava Self-governing Region Sabinovská 16, P.O. Box 106 820 05 Bratislava web: www.region-bsk.sk Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Ľubľanská 1 831 02 Bratislava web: http://ipp.szm.com More information about Transdanube.Pearls project are available at www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Page 2 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Abbreviations BSS Bike Sharing Scheme ECF European Cyclists´ Federation POI Point of Interest PT Public Transport Page 3 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Table of content Contacts ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bike Rental ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Execuive summary ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Best practice examples from across
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Analysis of Bicycle Facilities: Cases from Cities in the Portland, OR Region
    Cost Analysis of Bicycle Facilities: Cases from cities in the Portland, OR region FINAL DRAFT Lynn Weigand, Ph.D. Nathan McNeil, M.U.R.P. Jennifer Dill, Ph.D. June 2013 This report was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, through its Active Living Research program. Cost Analysis of Bicycle Facilities: Cases from cities in the Portland, OR region Lynn Weigand, PhD, Portland State University Nathan McNeil, MURP, Portland State University* Jennifer Dill, PhD, Portland State University *corresponding author: [email protected] Portland State University Center for Urban Studies Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies & Planning PO Box 751 Portland, OR 97207-0751 June 2013 All photos, unless otherwise noted, were taken by the report authors. The authors are grateful to the following peer reviewers for their useful comments, which improved the document: Angie Cradock, ScD, MPE, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; and Kevin J. Krizek, PhD, University of Colorado Boulder. Any errors or omissions, however, are the responsibility of the authors. CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. i Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 3 Bike Lanes................................................................................................................................ 7 Wayfinding Signs and Pavement Markings .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Bicycle Options for Federal Lands: Bike Sharing, Rentals and Employee Fleets
    FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 JANUARY 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS Technical Report published by Technology Deployment Program Western Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Highway Administration 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 For more information or additional copies contact: Susan Law, Planning Team Leader [email protected], 360.619.7840 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Rebecca Gleason, Laurie Miskimins 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Western Transportation Institute P.O. Box 174250 11. Contract or Grant No. Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Final Report Western Federal Lands Highway Division August 2009 – July 2011 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 14. Sponsoring Agency Code HFL-17 15. Supplementary Notes COTR: Susan Law – FHWA CFLHD/WFLHD. Advisory Panel Members: Adam Schildge – FTA, Alan Turnbull – NPS RTCA, Andrew Duvall, National Science Foundation IGERT PhD student, Brandon Jutz – FWS, Candace Rutt – CDC, Diana Allen – NPS RTCA, Franz Gimmler – non-motorized consultant, Ivan Levin – Outdoor Foundation, Jane D. Wargo – HHS, Jason Martz – NPS, Jim Evans – NPS, Nathan Caldwell – FWS, Paul DeMaio – Bike Share consultant, Tokey Boswell – NPS. This project was funded by the Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge Road Program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Public and Private Bicycle Use: the Case of Seville
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Castillo-Manzano, José I.; Castro-Nuño, Mercedes; Lopez-Valpuesta, Lourdes Conference Paper The relationship between public and private bicycle use: the case of Seville 55th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "World Renaissance: Changing roles for people and places", 25-28 August 2015, Lisbon, Portugal Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Castillo-Manzano, José I.; Castro-Nuño, Mercedes; Lopez-Valpuesta, Lourdes (2015) : The relationship between public and private bicycle use: the case of Seville, 55th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "World Renaissance: Changing roles for people and places", 25-28 August 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/124610 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]