DOCSLIB.ORG

Impacts of Low-Speed Vehicles on Transportation Infrastructure and Safety

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impacts of Low-Speed Vehicles on Transportation Infrastructure and Safety http://jtlu.org . 5 . 2 [2012] pp. 68–76 doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v5i2.250 Impacts of low-speed vehicles on transportation infrastructure and safety K. M. Hunter-Zaworski School of Civil and Construction Engineering a Oregon State University Abstract: Increasing numbers of low-speed electric vehicles (LSVs) now operate on public roadways. These vehicles are designed to be used within protected environments and on roadways with a maximum posted speed of 25 mph. Currently, these vehicles are not subject to the same federal requirements for occupant protection as passenger cars. The research reported in this paper investigated safety standards, operat- ing regulations, and LSV manufacturer materials from sources around the world. The purpose of the research was to determine the positive and negative impacts that LSVs, including neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs) and medium-speed electric vehicles (MSEVs), are likely to have for states such as Oregon and whether adjustments in state regulations are needed to ensure that LSVs do not negatively affect road safety and traffic operations or expose LSVs operators to undue risk. The US and Canadian federal motor vehicle safety agencies have harmonized their regulations and stipulated the maximum operating speed of these vehicles; however, state and local roadway authorities have regulated the maximum speed of roadways and intersection characteristics on which these vehicles can operate. The significant recommendations of this research are: (1) Appropriate state statues for LSVs should be amended such that LSVs are limited to public roadways with a maximum operating speed of 25 mph and are restricted to crossing higher speed roadways at four-way stop or signal-controlled intersections; and (2) Local transportation authorities should develop parallel or secondary low-speed roadway networks that connect residential neighborhoods with major activity centers. Figure 1 The GEM e2, an example of an LSV. [www.gemcar.com] 1 Introduction expected to increase significantly in the coming years due to increases in fossil fuel prices and new priorities for reducing Low-speed electric vehicles (LSVs) are becoming more com- dependence on fossil fuels, such as developing more sustainable mon on public roadways. Although small electric vehicles have transportation technologies and taking positive steps to reduce been prevalent for many years on golf courses and as mobility greenhouse gases. aids, their manufacture for use on public roadways as a short- LSVs, also referred to as neighborhood electric vehicles range alternative to fossil-fueled autos has been increasing in (NEVs), are limited to a maximum speed of 25 mph. In re- recent years. The US Energy Information Administration es- cent years manufacturers have introduced medium-speed elec- timates that the number of electric vehicles in use nationwide tric vehicles (MSEVs), which are essentially LSVs capable of has increased from 6,964 in 1999 to 53,526 in 2006—a seven- faster speeds— usually 35 mph. Both NEVs and MSEVs are fold increase in seven years (EIA 2007). While this number is expected to become more popular in the coming years for lo- still very small relative to the overall fleet of automobiles, it is cal commuting and personal errands. In this paper, NEVs that a [email protected] Copyright 2012 K. M. Hunter-Zaworski. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial License 3.0. Impacts of Low-Speed Vehicles on Transportation Infrastructure and Safety 69 are limited to a maximum speed of 25 mph will be referred to ect results can be applied nationally. In addition, the research as low-speed vehicles (LSVs), and MSEVs will refer to NEVs explored whether adjustments in current state regulations are capable of faster speeds. It is important to note that LSVs are needed to ensure that LSVs do not negatively affect road safety not in the same vehicle classification as all-electric passenger and traffic operations or expose LSVs operators to undue risk. cars. The new all-electric passenger cars and trucks have met International and North American operating and safety prac- or exceeded the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards for oc- tices that support the use of these vehicles were also investi- cupant protection, and these vehicles are not speed restricted or gated. The research was considered timely, since LSVs have the limited to low-speed roadways. Both LSVs and all-electric pas- potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and thus, poten- senger cars and trucks have the potential to significantly reduce tially improve the quality of community life. greenhouse gases. LSVs are already in use on many college and industrial campuses and in gated communities, such as retire- ment communities, in North America. These are the protected 3 Definitions environments that LSVs were designed for. In Europe and Asia, these vehicles are increasing in number as an extended For background purposes, federal, Oregon, and international mobility and independence option for seniors and people with definitions are presented. On June 17, 1998, the National disabilities. Worldwide these vehicles are being driven on pub- Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) officially- in lic roadways with posted speeds in excess of 25 mph. cluded LSVs as a motor vehicle category of the Federal Motor LSVs, as a class of motor vehicles, differ from conventional Vehicle Safety Standards and defined LSVs in 49 CFR 571.3. passenger cars in significant ways. Federal Motor Vehicle Safe- According to the definition in this rulemaking, a “Low-Speed ty Standards require that LSVs be equipped with headlights, Vehicle (LSV) is a four-wheeled motor vehicle whose attainable taillights, brake lights, turn signals, seat belts, and other safety speed in 1 mile is more than 20 miles per hour and not more features, but they are nonetheless smaller and lighter than con- than 25 miles per hour on a paved level surface and has a gross ventional cars. A University of California study notes that such vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of less than 3000 lbs.” This vehicles are typically shorter in length, width, and wheelbase group includes NEVs and speed-modified golf carts with top than the American Association of State Highway and Trans- speeds of more than 20 mph but less than 25 mph (NHTSA portation Officials (AASHTO) design for passenger cars; they 1998). also have slower acceleration (Stein, et al. 1994). LSVs are not new, but the increase in their numbers and use on public road- ways has increased concerns about licensing and permitting by 4 Regulations regulatory agencies such as state and city transportation depart- ments. Consequently, LSVs have inherent safety risks associ- 4.1 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: FMVSS ated with their use on public roadways and at intersections of 500 these roadways with high-speed facilities. Thus, as LSVs con- tinue to become more numerous on public roads, the need NHTSA has a legislative mandate—under Title 49 of the arises to investigate the impacts of their use to ensure the safety United States Code, Chapter 301, Motor Vehicle Safety—to of the traveling public. A brief examination of US state regula- issue Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) and tions shows a range of restrictions pertaining to LSV opera- regulations, to which manufacturers of motor vehicles and tions. The basis of these state regulations, however, is not clear. equipment items must conform and certify compliance. These There is a need to investigate a rational basis for regulations that federal safety standards are regulations written in terms of min- would protect the public while also providing for the use of imum safety performance requirements for motor vehicles or this energy-efficient, sustainable alternative to the conventional motor vehicle equipment. These requirements are specified in fossil-fueled passenger car for local, short-range travel. such a manner “that the public is protected against unreason- able risk of crashes occurring as a result of the design, con- struction, or performance of motor vehicles and is also pro- 2 Objectives tected against unreasonable risk of death or injury in the event crashes do occur” (NHTSA 1998). FMVSS No.500 specifies The specific goal of this research was to determine positive and the minimum equipment an LSVs must have to be compli- negative impacts that LSVs, which include NEVs and MSEVs, ant; this includes headlamps; stop lamps; turn signal lamps; are likely to have for the state of Oregon; however, the proj- tail lamps; reflex reflectors, one red on each side as far to the 70 JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND LAND USE 5.2 rear as practicable and one red on the rear; an exterior mirror cars (NHTSA 2008). NHTSA, however, denied the petition, mounted on the driver’s side of the vehicle; either an exterior primarily because of safety concerns. According to NHTSA, mirror mounted on the passenger’s side of the vehicle or an with its 35 mph speed limit, an MSEV would likely travel with interior mirror; a parking brake; a windshield that conforms to regular urban traffic. In such a traffic environment, NHTSA the FMVSS on glazing materials (49 CFR 571.205); a Vehicle requires the full set of FMVSS to prevent fatalities and seri- Identification Number that conforms to the requirements of ous injuries in motor vehicle collisions, which an MSEV likely part 565 VIN; and a Type 1 or Type 2 seat belt assembly con- would not have met (given the petitioners’ proposed MSEV forming to Sec. 571.209. Transport Canada has harmonized criteria). The presence of a roll cage or crushproof body the Federal Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standards with the would not guarantee that the vehicle was crashworthy and US Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (Transport Canada 2008). would meet the FMVSS for passenger cars (NHTSA 2008). In 2005, NHTSA amended the definition of LSVs by drop- The NHTSA action does not preclude states from registering ping the restriction on trucks, and instead established a MSEVs and regulating their operation on public roadways 2,500-pound maximum gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Survey on Electric/Hybrid Vehicles", Transmission and Driveline 2010 (SP-2291), SAE International, 2010-01-0856, Pp
    To reference this article: Bernardo RIBEIRO, Francisco P BRITO, Jorge MARTINS, "A survey on electric/hybrid vehicles", Transmission and Driveline 2010 (SP-2291), SAE International, 2010-01-0856, pp. 133-146, 2010 ISBN 2010-01-0856 978-0-7680-3425-7 ; DOI 10.4271/2010-01-0856 A survey on electric/hybrid vehicles Bernardo RIBEIRO, Francisco P BRITO, Jorge MARTINS Dep. Mechanical Engineering, Universidade do Minho, Portugal Copyright © 2010 SAE International ABSTRACT Since the late 19th century until recently several electric vehicles have been designed, manufactured and used throughout the world. Some were just prototypes, others were concept cars, others were just special purpose vehicles and lately, a considerable number of general purpose cars has been produced and commercialized. Since the mid nineties the transportation sector emissions are being increasingly regulated and the dependency on oil and its price fluctuations originated an increasing interest on electric vehicles (EV). A wide research was made on existing electric/hybrid vehicle models. Some of these vehicles were just in the design phase, but most reached the prototype or full market production. They were divided into several types, such as NEVs, prototypes, concept cars, and full homologated production cars. For each type of vehicle model a technical historic analysis was made. Data related to the vehicle configuration as well as the embedded systems were collected and compared. Based on these data future prospect of evolution was subsequently made. The main focus was put on city vehicles and long range vehicles. For city vehicles the market approach normally consists in the use of full electric configuration while for the latter, the hybrid configuration is commonly used.
    [Show full text]
  • Volkswagen AG Annual Report 2009
    Driving ideas. !..5!,2%0/24 Key Figures MFCBJN8><E>IFLG )''0 )''/ Mfcld\;XkX( M\_`Zc\jXc\jle`kj -#*'0#.+* -#).(#.)+ "'%- Gif[lZk`fele`kj -#',+#/)0 -#*+-#,(, Æ+%- <dgcfp\\jXk;\Z%*( *-/#,'' *-0#0)/ Æ'%+ )''0 )''/ =`eXeZ`Xc;XkX@=IJj #d`cc`fe JXc\ji\m\el\ (',#(/. ((*#/'/ Æ.%- Fg\iXk`e^gif]`k (#/,, -#*** Æ.'%. Gif]`kY\]fi\kXo (#)-( -#-'/ Æ/'%0 Gif]`kX]k\ikXo 0(( +#-// Æ/'%- Gif]`kXkki`YlkXYc\kfj_Xi\_fc[\ijf]MfcbjnX^\e8> 0-' +#.,* Æ.0%/ :Xj_]cfnj]ifdfg\iXk`e^XZk`m`k`\j)()#.+( )#.') o :Xj_]cfnj]ifd`em\jk`e^XZk`m`k`\j)('#+)/ ((#-(* Æ('%) 8lkfdfk`m\;`m`j`fe* <9@K;8+ /#'', ()#('/ Æ**%0 :Xj_]cfnj]ifdfg\iXk`e^XZk`m`k`\j) ()#/(, /#/'' "+,%- :Xj_]cfnj]ifd`em\jk`e^XZk`m`k`\j)#,('#),) ((#+.0 Æ('%. f]n_`Z_1`em\jkd\ekj`egifg\ikp#gcXekXe[\hl`gd\ek),#./* -#..* Æ(+%- XjXg\iZ\ekX^\f]jXc\ji\m\el\ -%) -%- ZXg`kXc`q\[[\m\cfgd\ekZfjkj (#0+/ )#)(- Æ()%( XjXg\iZ\ekX^\f]jXc\ji\m\el\ )%( )%) E\kZXj_]cfn )#,-* Æ)#-.0 o E\kc`hl`[`kpXk;\Z%*( ('#-*- /#'*0 "*)%* )''0 )''/ I\klieiXk`fj`e I\kliefejXc\jY\]fi\kXo (%) ,%/ I\kliefe`em\jkd\ekX]k\ikXo8lkfdfk`m\;`m`j`fe *%/ ('%0 I\kliefe\hl`kpY\]fi\kXo=`eXeZ`XcJ\im`Z\j;`m`j`fe -.%0 ()%( ( @eZcl[`e^mfcld\[XkX]fik_\m\_`Zc\$gif[lZk`fe`em\jkd\ekjJ_Xe^_X`$MfcbjnX^\e8lkfdfk`m\:fdgXepCk[% Xe[=8N$MfcbjnX^\e8lkfdfk`m\:fdgXepCk[%#n_`Z_Xi\XZZflek\[]filj`e^k_\\hl`kpd\k_f[% ) )''/X[aljk\[% * @eZcl[`e^XccfZXk`fef]Zfejfc`[Xk`feX[aljkd\ekjY\kn\\ek_\8lkfdfk`m\Xe[=`eXeZ`XcJ\im`Z\j[`m`j`fej% + Fg\iXk`e^gif]`kgclje\k[\gi\Z`Xk`fe&Xdfik`qXk`feXe[`dgX`id\ekcfjj\j&i\m\ijXcjf]`dgX`id\ekcfjj\jfegifg\ikp#gcXekXe[\hl`gd\ek# ZXg`kXc`q\[[\m\cfgd\ekZfjkj#c\Xj`e^Xe[i\ekXcXjj\kj#^ff[n`ccXe[]`eXeZ`XcXjj\kjXji\gfik\[`ek_\ZXj_]cfnjkXk\d\ek% , <oZcl[`e^XZhl`j`k`feXe[[`jgfjXcf]\hl`kp`em\jkd\ekj1Ñ.#,/,d`cc`feÑ/#/.0d`cc`fe % - Gif]`kY\]fi\kXoXjXg\iZ\ekX^\f]Xm\iX^\\hl`kp% .
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Board Book, September 7-8, 2000
    . 7 SUMMARY OF BOARD ITEM ITEM # 00-8-3: 2000 ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE PROGRAM BIENNIAL REVIEW DISCUSSION: The Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) program was adopted in 1990 as part of the Low-Emission Vehicle regulations. When the ZEV requirement was first adopted, low- and zero-emission vehicle technology was in a very early stage of development. The Board acknowledged that many issues would need to be addressed prior to the implementation date. The Board directed staff to provide an update on the ZEV program on a biennial basis, in order to provide a context for the necessary policy discussion and deliberation. SUMMARY AND IMPACTS: At this 2000 Biennial Review, the staff will present to the Board its assessment of the current status of ZEV technology and the prospects for improvement in the near- and long-term. Major issues addressed include market demand for ZEVs, cost, and environmental and energy benefits. To help assess the current status of technology and the environmental impact of the program, ARB has funded research projects to examine the performance, cost and availability of advanced batteries, fuel cycle emissions from various automotive fuels, and the fuel cycle energy conversion efficiency for various fuel types. In preparation for this 2000 Biennial Review, ARB staff has solicited input from interested, parties throughout the process. As part of this effort, workshops were held in March and May/June 2000. Draft versions of the Staff Report have been available to the public since March 2000. The Board will consider information presented by staff and all interested parties. 8 9 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD - NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE BIENNIAL REVIEW OF THE ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE REGULATION The California Air Resources Board (Board or ARB) will conduct a public meeting at the time and place noted below to review the Zero Emission Vehicle regulation and progress towards its implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • MAZDA CENTENARY 100 Years of a Japanese Success Story
    MAZDA CENTENARY 100 years of a Japanese Success Story ROTARY Experience the story behind this legendary engine – and why Mazda would not be the same without it. DESIGN Learn more about Mazda’s evolving design approach, and why it is inextricably 100 YEARS OF A JAPANESE SUCCESS STORY linked to its Japanese origins. TECHNOLOGY Independent and creative: Mazda’s engineering follows a unique path of innovation. MAZDA MAZDA CENTENARY EDITORIAL 3 marks a very special occasion for Mazda: It is the year the com- 2020 pany is becoming a shinise. In Japan, this term is reserved for companies with an exceptionally long history and proud tradition. On Jan- uary 30th, Mazda’s 100th anniversary, we are joining this exclusive club – and what a hundred years it has been! In this time, we as a company have accomplished a lot. Mazda has turned itself from a manufacturer of cork products into an internationally recognised and successful independent automotive manufacturer. We have revitalised the rotary engine and have developed a host of our own ground-breaking technologies, including the latest Skyactiv-X, which is pushing the limits of the internal combustion engine and is already a great success. We have established a unique design language that marries Japanese tradition with contemporary style; human craftsmanship with modern production procedures. We have launched iconic mod- els which have been delighting fans for decades now. And we have won over the hearts of millions of loyal customers all over the world – not least here in Europe – and sold about 1,5 million cars in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tupelo Automobile Museum Auction Tupelo, Mississippi | April 26 & 27, 2019
    The Tupelo Automobile Museum Auction Tupelo, Mississippi | April 26 & 27, 2019 The Tupelo Automobile Museum Auction Tupelo, Mississippi | Friday April 26 and Saturday April 27, 2019 10am BONHAMS INQUIRIES BIDS 580 Madison Avenue Rupert Banner +1 (212) 644 9001 New York, New York 10022 +1 (917) 340 9652 +1 (212) 644 9009 (fax) [email protected] [email protected] 7601 W. Sunset Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90046 Evan Ide From April 23 to 29, to reach us at +1 (917) 340 4657 the Tupelo Automobile Museum: 220 San Bruno Avenue [email protected] +1 (212) 461 6514 San Francisco, California 94103 +1 (212) 644 9009 John Neville +1 (917) 206 1625 bonhams.com/tupelo To bid via the internet please visit [email protected] bonhams.com/tupelo PREVIEW & AUCTION LOCATION Eric Minoff The Tupelo Automobile Museum +1 (917) 206-1630 Please see pages 4 to 5 and 223 to 225 for 1 Otis Boulevard [email protected] bidder information including Conditions Tupelo, Mississippi 38804 of Sale, after-sale collection and shipment. Automobilia PREVIEW Toby Wilson AUTOMATED RESULTS SERVICE Thursday April 25 9am - 5pm +44 (0) 8700 273 619 +1 (800) 223 2854 Friday April 26 [email protected] Automobilia 9am - 10am FRONT COVER Motorcars 9am - 6pm General Information Lot 450 Saturday April 27 Gregory Coe Motorcars 9am - 10am +1 (212) 461 6514 BACK COVER [email protected] Lot 465 AUCTION TIMES Friday April 26 Automobilia 10am Gordan Mandich +1 (323) 436 5412 Saturday April 27 Motorcars 10am [email protected] 25593 AUCTION NUMBER: Vehicle Documents Automobilia Lots 1 – 331 Stanley Tam Motorcars Lots 401 – 573 +1 (415) 503 3322 +1 (415) 391 4040 Fax ADMISSION TO PREVIEW AND AUCTION [email protected] Bonhams’ admission fees are listed in the Buyer information section of this catalog on pages 4 and 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Spazia-HPP: Hybrid Plug-In for Small Vehicle
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 81 ( 2015 ) 108 – 116 69th Conference of the Italian Thermal Machines Engineering Association, ATI2014 Spazia-HPP: Hybrid plug-in for small vehicle Fabio Cigninia*, Fernando Ortenzib, Ennio Rossic, Stefano Virginiod aUniv. Sapienza dept. CTL,Via Eudossiana 18, Rome - 00184, Italy b, cENEA Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, S. M. Galeria (Rome), Italy dUniv. Sapienza, Via Eudossiana 18mailto:[email protected], Rome – 00184, Italy Abstract The Spazia-HPP project proposes a conversion kit called Hybrid Power Pack (HPP) [5] for common microcar; it was installed on a prototype called "Spazia", a typical quadricycle of the category L6e. It has an internal combustion engine, which allows you to turn common microcar into parallel hybrid thermal – electric vehicle. The aim is to promote a system of easy installation, which increase acceleration by 20% and reduces fuel consumption by almost 25% compared to a traditional Diesel quadricycle. The results are obtained by testing on a chassis dynamometer at the research centre ENEA Casaccia (Rome). © 20152014 The F. Cignini,Authors. F.Published Ortenzi, by S. Elsevier Virginio. Ltd. Published This is an byopen Elsevier access articleLtd. under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Selection and peer-review under responsibility of ATI NAZIONALE. Peer-review under responsibility of the Scientific Committee of ATI 2014 Keywords: Internal combustion engine, hybrid traction, electric traction, renewable energy. 1876-6102 © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Report Collision Losses 2014–16 Passenger Cars, Pickups, Suvs, and Vans
    Highway Loss Data Institute Insurance Report Collision Losses 2014–16 Passenger Cars, Pickups, SUVs, and Vans R-16 December 2016 Highlights Collision Auto / Collision Moto The collision claim frequency for 2014–16 model year passenger vehicles was 7.4 claims per 100 insured vehicle years. The average loss payment per claim (claim severity) was $5,256, and the average loss payment per insured vehicle year (overall losses) was $390. Collision overall losses were highest for very large luxury cars ($764 per in- sured vehicle year) at nearly twice the all-passenger-vehicle average ($390). Two-door microcars had the lowest overall losses ($245). Collision claim frequency was highest for large two-door cars, a category con- sisting of variants of the Dodge Challenger,Comp Auto and four-door / Comp microcars, Moto a vehicle class containing two Mitsubishi vehicles (10.1 claims per 100 insured vehicle years) and lowest for small luxury cars (5.1 claims). Theft — Auto /Moto combined PD — Auto PD, BI, Med Pay — Moto BI — Auto Med Pay — Auto PIP — Auto only Non-crash re — Auto only Special — Auto /Moto Specs 2016 Board of Directors Chair Thomas O. Rau, Nationwide Insurance Vice Chair Harry Todd Pearce, GEICO Corporation Prior Chair John Xu, CSAA Insurance Group Justin B. Cruz, American Family Mutual Insurance Michael D. Doerfler, Progressive Corporation Peter R. Foley, American Insurance Association John Grunin, The Hartford John Hardiman, New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Group Ty Harris, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Richard Lonardo, MetLife Auto and Home Justin Milam, American National Property and Casualty Companies Thomas G. Myers, Plymouth Rock Assurance Hiep Nguyen, USAA James Nutting, Farmers Insurance Group of Companies Robert C.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Classification of Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes Eighth Edition
    AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD ANSI D.16-2017 8th Edition 2017 - Manual on Classification of 16 . Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes ANSI D American National Standard ANSI D.16 – 2017 ANSI D.16 – 2017 American National Standard Manual on Classification of Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes Eighth Edition Secretariat Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals Prepared by the D.16-2017 Committee on Classification of Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes under the direction of the Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals Approved December 18, 2017 American National Standards Institute, Inc. American National Standard ANSI D.16 – 2017 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD Approval of an American National Standard requires verification by ANSI that the requirements for due process, consensus, and other criteria for approval have been met by the standards developer. Consensus is established when, in the judgment of the ANSI Board of Standards Review, substantial agreement has been reached by directly and materially affected interests. Substantial agreement means much more than a simple majority, but not necessarily unanimity. Consensus requires that all views and objections be considered, and that a concerted effort be made toward their resolution. The use of American National Standards is completely voluntary; their existence does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether he has approved the standards or not, from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standards. The American National Standards Institute does not develop standards and will in no circumstance give an interpretation of any American National Standard. Moreover, no person shall have the right or authority to issue an interpretation of an American National Standard in the name of the American National Standards Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Renault's Profit Machine Is Called Dacia
    A publication from December 2012 Volume 01 | Issue 09 global www.ane-globalmonthly.com monthly Your source for everything automotive. Renault’s profit machine No-frills Dacia makes big money around the world; forces rivals to try to match its success © 2012 Crain Communications Inc. All rights reserved. Inc. Communications Crain © 2012 CEO Mulally March 2012 A publication from global monthly dAtA sees better days Volume 01 | Issue 01 for Ford in Europe New Quattroporte WESTERN EUROPE SALES BY MODEL, 9 MONTHSmarks startbrought of to you courtesy of Maserati’s rebirthwww.jato.com JATO data shows 9 months 9 months Unit Percent 9 months 9 months Unit Percent 2011 2010 change change 2011 2010 change change Europe winners Scenic/Grand Scenic ......... 116,475 137,093 –20,618 –15% A1 ................................. 73,394 6,307 +67,087 – Espace/Grand Espace ...... 12,656 12,340 +316 3% A3/S3/RS3 ..................... 107,684 135,284 –27,600 –20% in first 10 months Koleos ........................... 11,474 9,386 +2,088 22% A4/S4/RS4 ..................... 120,301 133,366 –13,065 –10% Kangoo ......................... 24,693 27,159 –2,466 –9% A6/S6/RS6/Allroad ......... 56,012 51,950 +4,062 8% Trafic ............................. 8,142 7,057 +1,085 15% A7 ................................. 14,475 220 +14,255 – Other ............................ 592 1,075 –483 –45% A8/S8 ............................ 6,985 5,549 +1,436 26% Total Renault brand ........ 747,129 832,216 –85,087 –10% TT .................................. 14,401 13,435 +966 7% RENAULT ........................ 898,644 994,894 –96,250 –10% A5/S5/RS5 ..................... 54,387 59,925 –5,538 –9% RENAULT-NISSAN ...........
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Market for Compact Cars
    a look at The global market for compact cars The search for fuel-saving solutions has led to a trend for acquiring smaller and lighter cars. Small compact cars, whether powered by internal combustion or electric engines, have gained and are continuing to gain market share, in both mature automobile markets such as Europe or Japan and emerging markets such as India. In Europe and in France, automotive A and B segments These cars have the highest market share in Europe, and categorize: this share has been increasing since the 1990s. Today, 4 cars out of 10 sold in Europe are in the A and B segments, I mini cars for the A segment, such as the Fiat 500, compared with 3 out of 10 in the early 1990s (Fig. 1). No Peugeot 108, Renault Twingo and Citroën C-Zero. other range has seen such growth over this period. Very compact, their length varies between 3.1 m and 3.6 m in Europe; The C segment is small family cars, the D segment large family cars, and the H segment luxury saloon cars I supermini cars or “subcompacts” for the B segment, and tourers. such as the Toyota Yaris, Citroën DS3, Renault Clio and Peugeot 208. Slightly bigger than A segment cars, they are still very easy to handle due to their Fig. 2 – Sub-A segment cars length, often under 4 meters, but their 5 seats make Tata Nano Renault Twizy them more versatile. Fig. 1 – Breakdown of the European automobile market by range of vehicles % 9 . 45% 0 4 40% Kia Pop Lumeneo Neoma % % 2 9 .
    [Show full text]
  • April 2007.Pmd
    Volume 4, Issue 2 / April - June, 2007 A WORD FROM THE A WORD FROM THE In This Issue: PRESIDENT In This Issue: CURATOR Amelia Island Concours d'Elegance Spring has arrived and Lane Motor Great American Race 2007 What a start to 2007! The Antique Museum celebrated 2007's first special Automobile Club of America presented 4th Annual Microcar Drive day on Saturday, March 3rd. “Start Your Lane Motor Museum a national award at Engines” was a great success at the the Annual Meeting held in February in Museum as we started up about ten cars Philadelphia. The AACA Plaque was on the floor so everyone could hear what awarded in recognition of outstanding the cars sound like when they are achievement in the preservation of running. We also opened the hoods on automotive history. We are humbled and all cars so guests could get a better honored. look at the Museum’s powerplants. We started our show season at the 12th The Museum has started its volunteer Annual Amelia Island Concours program to help enhance our visitors’ d’Elegance to benefit Community Hospice experience while they are here. Training of Northeast Florida. A special feature this was held in February. Starting in March, year was the Cars of Coachcraft. On the the Museum will have volunteers on the show field were 7 cars built by this floor for special events and weekends. Above: Jeff and Susan Lane with Mr. Hollywood, California coachbuilder. Our I want to thank all of our volunteers for Hinner, Ecorra employees who are aluminum bodied, 1946 Hewson Rocket building the Aerosled, and former Tatra their support of the Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • IIHS Status Report Newsletter, Vol. 53, No. 5, August 16, 2018
    StatusInsurance Institute for Highway Safety | Highway Loss DataReport Institute Family matters 2 of 3 minivans earn acceptable or good rating in passenger-side test 4Risk of noncrash fires ALSO IN drops after recalls THIS ISSUE Vol. 53, No. 5 4Red light camera program August 16, 2018 guidelines spotlight safety Chrysler Pacifica, Honda Odyssey outperform Toyota Sienna in passenger-side small overlap test; LATCH ratings are mixed he Toyota Sienna stumbled, the Chrysler Pacifica turned in we saw some structural deficiencies on the right side that still need an acceptable performance and the Honda Odyssey finished addressing.” T strong in the Institute’s passenger-side small overlap front The Pacifica earns an acceptable rating in the passenger-side small crash test. overlap front test, and the Odyssey earns a good rating. Results for The 2018–19 model minivans are the latest group to be put through the Odyssey first were released in September 2017. The Sienna earns the passenger-side small overlap test. A small overlap crash occurs a marginal rating in the passenger-side small overlap test. when just the front corner of the vehicle strikes another vehicle or an object such as a tree or utility pole. IIHS began rating vehicles for oc- Safety cage shortcomings cupant protection in a driver-side small overlap front crash in 2012 Starting with 2015 models, Toyota modified the structure of the and added the passenger-side test last year to make sure occupants Sienna to improve driver-side protection but didn’t make the same on both sides of the vehicle get equal protection.
    [Show full text]