DOCSLIB.ORG

Diabetes Mellitus (1 of 42)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diabetes Mellitus (1 of 42) Diabetes Mellitus (1 of 42) 1 Patient presents w/ symptoms of diabetes mellitus (DM) or asymptomatic patient is screened for DM 2 PREDIABETES A DIAGNOSIS/ Patient education SCREENING No* B Lifestyle modifi cation Is DM C Pharmacological therapy confi rmed? • Metformin Yes 3 E INITIAL EVALUATION Screening & management • Detect presence of of DM complications/ diabetic complications & comorbidities comorbid conditions 4 DM CLASSIFICATION TYPE 1 DM TYPE 2 DM OTHER SPECIFIC GESTATIONAL • β-cell destruction • Progressive loss TYPES DM GDM leading to complete of β-cell insulin • Uncommon causes; insulin defi ciency secretion underlying cause or concomitant w/ disease is identifi ed insulin resistance & relative insulin defi ciency Please see Gestational Diabetes Mellitus TREATMENT TREATMENT disease management See page 2 See pages 3-6 chart for further © MIMSinformation *For individuals w/ normal test results, lifestyle management, including counselling regarding diet, physical activity, weight loss & smoking cessation, is advised. Screening should be done annually for patients w/ pre-diabetes & every 3 years for patients negative for diabetes after screening. Not all products are available or approved for above use in all countries. Specifi c prescribing information may be found in the latest MIMS. 2 © MIMS 2021 Diabetes Mellitus (2 of 42) TYPE 1 DM REFER TO DIABETES SPECIALIST/ ENDOCRINOLOGIST A Patient education B Lifestyle modifi cation • Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) - Match prandial insulin to carbohydrate intake, premeal blood glucose, & anticipated activity • Physical activity & exercise C Pharmacological therapy • Insulin (multiple daily injections or pumps) D CONTINUE ASSESSMENT OF MANAGEMENT GLYCEMIC CONTROL Yes PLAN Is patient able to achieve • Provide regular glycemic control? follow-up No FURTHER EVALUATION BY DIABETES SPECIALIST/ MIMSENDOCRINOLOGIST © Not all products are available or approved for above use in all countries. Specifi c prescribing information may be found in the latest MIMS. 3 © MIMS 2021 Diabetes Mellitus (3 of 42) TYPE 2 DM A Patient education B Lifestyle modifi cation C Pharmacological therapy Metformin - 1st-line agent 3 See EVALUATION No MANAGEMENT Does the patient have ASCVD, on pages HF or CKD? 4, 5 & 6 Yes W/ PREDOMINANT ASCVD W/ PREDOMINANT HF W/ PREDOMINANT CKD C Pharmacological therapy C Pharmacological therapy C Pharmacological therapy • Glucagon-like peptide-1 • SGLT2 inhibitor • SGLT2 inhibitor (GLP-1) agonist either/or (preferred) or • Sodium-glucose linked • GLP-1 agonist transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor D CONTINUE ASSESSMENT OF MANAGEMENT GLYCEMIC CONTROL Yes PLAN Did patient achieve glycemic • Provide regular goal after 3 months? follow-up No Patients w/ ASCVD Patients w/ HF or CKD C C Pharmacological therapy MIMS Pharmacological therapy Add either Add either • Other class not previously used (GLP-1 • Other class not previously used (GLP-1 agonist or SGLT2 inhibitor) agonist or SGLT2 inhibitor) • Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor • DPP-4 inhibitor (not Saxagliptin) in HF if not on GLP-1 agonist (if not on GLP-1 agonist) • Basal insulin • Basal insulin • iazolidinedione • Sulfonylurea • Sulfonylurea Avoid iazolidinedione in the setting of HF If glycemic goal is not met, consider intensifying If glycemic goal is not met, consider intensifying to injectable ©therapy to injectable therapy ASCVD = Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CKD = Chronic kidney disease; HF= Heart failure References: American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2021. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S116. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, et al. 2019 update to: management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):487-493. Not all products are available or approved for above use in all countries. Specifi c prescribing information may be found in the latest MIMS. 4 © MIMS 2021 Diabetes Mellitus (4 of 42) TYPE 2 DM W/ NO COMORBIDITIES NEED TO MINIMIZE WEIGHT GAIN OR PROMOTE WEIGHT LOSS A Patient education B Lifestyle modifi cation C Pharmacological therapy Metformin - 1st-line agent D ASSESSMENT OF GLYCEMIC CONTROL Yes Did patient achieve glycemic goal after 3 months? No C Pharmacological therapy • Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist either/or • Sodium-glucose linked transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor D CONTINUE MANAGEMENT Did patient achieve Yes PLAN glycemic goal after • 3 months? Provide regular follow-up No C Pharmacological therapy • Other class not previously used (GLP-1 agonist or SGLT2 inhibitor) D No Did patient achieve Yes glycemic goal after MIMS3 months? C Pharmacological therapy Add either • DPP-4 inhibitor if not on GLP-1 agonist (preferred) • Basal insulin • iazolidinedione • Sulfonylurea If glycemic goal is not met, consider intensifying to© injectable therapy References: American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2021. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S116. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, et al. 2019 update to: management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):487-493. Not all products are available or approved for above use in all countries. Specifi c prescribing information may be found in the latest MIMS. 5 © MIMS 2021 Diabetes Mellitus (5 of 42) TYPE 2 DM W/ NO COMORBIDITIES NEED TO MINIMIZE HYPOGLYCEMIA A Patient education B Lifestyle modifi cation C Pharmacological therapy Metformin - 1st-line agent D CONTINUE ASSESSMENT OF MANAGEMENT GLYCEMIC CONTROL Yes PLAN Did patient achieve glycemic • Provide regular goal after 3 months? follow-up No C Pharmacological therapy C Pharmacological therapy C Pharmacological therapy • DPP-4 inhibitor or • SGLT2 inhibitor • iazolidinedione • GLP-1 agonist D CONTINUE MANAGEMENT Did patient achieve Yes PLAN glycemic goal after • 3 months? Provide regular follow-up No C Pharmacological therapy C Pharmacological therapy C Pharmacological therapy • GLP-1 agonist or • SGLT2 inhibitor or • SGLT2 inhibitor or • DPP-4 inhibitor or • DPP-4 inhibitor or • iazolidinedione • iazolidinedione • GLP-1 agonist D CONTINUE MIMSMANAGEMENT Did patient achieve Yes PLAN glycemic goal after • No 3 months? Provide regular follow-up C Pharmacological therapy Continue adding other agents above or consider adding • Sulfonylurea or • Basal insulin If glycemic goal© is not met, consider intensifying to injectable therapy References: American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2021. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S116. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, et al. 2019 update to: management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):487-493. Not all products are available or approved for above use in all countries. Specifi c prescribing information may be found in the latest MIMS. 6 © MIMS 2021 Diabetes Mellitus (6 of 42) TYPE 2 DM W/ NO COMORBIDITIES NEED TO CONSIDER TREATMENT COST* A Patient education B Lifestyle modifi cation C Pharmacological therapy Metformin - 1st-line agent D ASSESSMENT OF GLYCEMIC CONTROL Yes Did patient achieve glycemic goal after 3 months? No C Pharmacological therapy • Sulfonylurea or • iazolidinedione D CONTINUE MANAGEMENT Did patient achieve Yes PLAN glycemic goal after • 3 months? Provide regular follow-up No C Pharmacological therapy • Other class not previously used (Sulfonylurea or iazolidinedione) D Did patient achieve Yes glycemic goal after MIMS3 months? No C Pharmacological therapy • Basal insulin or • DPP-4 inhibitor or SGLT2 inhibitor If glycemic goal is not met, consider intensifying to injectable therapy *Cost of drugs may© vary between countries. Consider local recommendations to guide choice of drug. References: American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2021. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44 (Suppl 1):S116. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, et al. 2019 update to: management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):487-493. Not all products are available or approved for above use in all countries. Specifi c prescribing information may be found in the latest MIMS. 7 © MIMS 2021 Diabetes Mellitus (7 of 42) INTENSIFYING TO INJECTABLE THERAPY GLP1 AGONIST1 &/OR BASAL INSULIN2 • May add basal analog or bedtime NPH insulin • Consider dose titration D ASSESSMENT OF GLYCEMIC Yes CONTINUE MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTROL • Provide regular follow-up Did patient achieve glycemic goal? • Consider GLP-1 agonist if not previously given • If on bedtime NPH, consider switching to No twice-daily NPH regimen • If HbA1c remains above target, add prandial insulin ADD PRANDIAL INSULIN (One dose w/ the largest meal or meal w/ greatest postprandial glucose excursion) • Consider titrating dose twice weekly D Did patient CONTINUE MANAGEMENT PLAN achieve glycemic goal Yes • Provide regular follow-up after 3 months? No CONSIDER OTHER INSULIN REGIMENS • Self-mixed/split insulin regimen or • Twice-daily premix insulin regimen STEPWISE PRANDIAL INSULIN Individualize dose titration • Add prandial insulin (ie 2 then 3 additional injections) • Consider dose titration D
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fixed Dose Combination of Voglibose & Repaglinide in the Management
    Clinical Group Global Journal of Obesity, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome ISSN: 2455-8583 DOI CC By Arif Faruqui* Research Article Medical Services Department, Medley Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, India Fixed Dose Combination of Voglibose Dates: Received: 09 August, 2017; Accepted: 26 August, 2017; Published: 28 August, 2017 & Repaglinide in the Management of *Corresponding author: Arif Faruqui, Medical Services Department, Medley Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, Postprandial Hyperglycemia in Indian India, E-mail: Subjects Keywords: T2DM; Postprandial hyperglycemia; Voglibose; Repaglinide https://www.peertechz.com Abstract To evaluate the effi cacy and tolerability of fi xed dose combination of voglibose and repaglinide in postprandial hyperglycemia (PPHG) in Indian subjects. A non-randomized, open labeled, non-comparative, single-centric, study was conducted in total of 20 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients (9 men and 11 women, mean age 69.07 ± 3.495 years). Each patient was administered a fi xed dose combination of voglibose 0.3mg and repaglinide 0.5/1mg three times a day, just before each meal for 30 days. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) was performed at baseline and at the end of study as assessment tools. At the end of study data was extractable only in 15 patients because 5 patient dropped out as they did not turn up for follow up at day 30.Postprandial blood glucose reduced signifi cantly {-61.67mg/dl (95% confi dence interval -76.79 to -46.54 p<0.0001)} from baseline at day 30. Also a signifi cant reduction (p<0.0001) was found with FBG {-42.13mg/dl (Confi dence interval -61.25 to -23.02 P value <0.0001)} at end of day 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Patterns, Persistence and Adherence Rates in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Japan: a Claims- Based Cohort Study
    Open access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025806 on 1 March 2019. Downloaded from Treatment patterns, persistence and adherence rates in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: a claims- based cohort study Rimei Nishimura,1 Haruka Kato,2 Koichi Kisanuki,2 Akinori Oh,2 Shinzo Hiroi,2 Yoshie Onishi,3 Florent Guelfucci,4 Yukio Shimasaki2 To cite: Nishimura R, Kato H, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Kisanuki K, et al. Treatment Objective To determine real-world trends in antidiabetic patterns, persistence and drug use, and persistence and adherence, in Japanese ► This retrospective evaluation of administrative adherence rates in patients patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). with type 2 diabetes mellitus claims data (2011–2015) using the Japan Medical Design Retrospective evaluation of administrative claims in Japan: a claims-based Data Center (JMDC) and Medical Data Vision (MDV) data (2011–2015) using the Japan Medical Data Center cohort study. BMJ Open databases was conducted to determine real-world (JMDC) and Medical Data Vision (MDV) databases. 2019;9:e025806. doi:10.1136/ trends in antidiabetic drug use, and persistence and Setting Analysis of two administrative claims databases bmjopen-2018-025806 adherence, in Japanese patients with type 2 dia- for Japanese patients with T2DM. betes mellitus (T2DM); 40 908 and 90 421 patients ► Prepublication history and Participants Adults (aged ≥18 years) with an International additional material for this were included from the JMDC and MDV databases, Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision code of T2DM and paper are available online. To respectively. at least one antidiabetic drug prescription.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Investigation Results Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors
    Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency This English version is intended to be a reference material for the convenience of users. In the event of inconsistency between the Japanese original and this English translation, the former shall prevail. Summary of investigation results Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors September 15, 2015 Non-proprietary name a. Canagliflozin hydrate b. Dapagliflozin propylene glycolate hydrate c. Empagliflozin d. Ipragliflozin L-proline e. Luseogliflozin hydrate f. Tofogliflozin hydrate Brand name (Marketing authorization holder) a. Canaglu Tablets 100 mg (Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation) b. Forxiga Tablets 5 mg and 10 mg (AstraZeneca K.K.) c. Jardiance Tablets 10 mg and 25 mg (Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.) d. Suglat Tablets 25 mg and 50 mg (Astellas Pharma Inc.) e. Lusefi Tablets 2.5 mg and 5 mg (Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) f. Apleway Tablets 20 mg (Sanofi K.K.) and Deberza Tablets 20 mg (Kowa Company, Ltd.) Indications Type 2 diabetes mellitus Summary of revision 1. Precautions regarding ketoacidosis should be added in the Important Precautions section for the above products from a to f. 2. “Ketoacidosis” should be newly added in the Clinically significant adverse reaction section for the above products from a to f. 3. “Sepsis” should be added to the “Pyelonephritis” subsection in the Important Precautions section for the above products from a to f. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Office of Safety I 3-3-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0013 Japan E-mail: [email protected] Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency This English version is intended to be a reference material for the convenience of users.
    [Show full text]
  • Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to Implement Changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix
    United States International Trade Commission Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to Implement Changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix USITC Publication 4208 December 2010 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Deanna Tanner Okun, Chairman Irving A. Williamson, Vice Chairman Charlotte R. Lane Daniel R. Pearson Shara L. Aranoff Dean A. Pinkert Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to Implement Changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix Publication 4208 December 2010 (This page is intentionally blank) Pursuant to the letter of request from the United States Trade Representative of December 15, 2010, set forth at the end of this publication, and pursuant to section 1207(a) of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act, the United States International Trade Commission is publishing the following modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) to implement changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix, effective on January 1, 2011. Table 1 International Nonproprietary Name (INN) products proposed for addition to the Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule INN CAS Number Abagovomab 792921-10-9 Aclidinium Bromide 320345-99-1 Aderbasib 791828-58-5 Adipiplon 840486-93-3 Adoprazine 222551-17-9 Afimoxifene 68392-35-8 Aflibercept 862111-32-8 Agatolimod
    [Show full text]
  • CDR Clinical Review Report for Soliqua
    CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report Insulin glargine and lixisenatide injection (Soliqua) (Sanofi-Aventis) Indication: adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on basal insulin (less than 60 units daily) alone or in combination with metformin. Service Line: CADTH Common Drug Review Version: Final (with redactions) Publication Date: January 2019 Report Length: 118 Pages Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care professionals, health systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. While patients and others may access this document, the document is made available for informational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its fitness for any particular purpose. The information in this document should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any information, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or services. While care has been taken to ensure that the information prepared by CADTH in this document is accurate, complete, and up-to-date as at the applicable date the material was first published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that effect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible for the quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Renato Wilberto Zilli Eficácia Em Longo Prazo Das
    RENATO WILBERTO ZILLI EFICÁCIA EM LONGO PRAZO DAS GLIFLOZINAS VERSUS GLIPTINAS NO TRATAMENTO DO DIABETES MELLITUS TIPO 2 APÓS FALÊNCIA DA METFORMINA COMO MONOTERAPIA: REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA E METANÁLISE EM REDE Tese apresentada ao Programa de Ciências Médicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências. Área de Concentração: Processos Imunes e Infecciosos Orientador: Prof. Dr. Fabiano Pinheiro da Silva (Versão corrigida. Resolução CoPGr 6018/11, de 13 de outubro de 2011. A versão original está disponível na Biblioteca da FMUSP) São Paulo 2017 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) Preparada pela Biblioteca da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo ©reprodução autorizada pelo autor Zilli, Renato Wilberto Eficácia em longo prazo das gliflozinas versus gliptinas no tratamento do diabetes mellitus tipo 2 após falência da metformina como monoterapia : revisão sistemática e metanálise em rede / Renato Wilberto Zilli ‐‐ São Paulo, 2017. Tese(doutorado)--Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Programa de Ciências Médicas. Área de concentração: Processos Imunes e Infecciosos. Orientador: Fabiano Pinheiro da Silva. Descritores: 1.Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 2.Metanálise 3.Terapia combinada 4.Falha de tratamento 5.Metformina 6.Inibidores da dipeptidil peptidase IV 7.Transportador 2 de glucose‐sódio/inibidores 8.Empagliflozina 9.Dapagliflozina 10.Saxagliptina USP/FM/DBD ‐302/17 Esta tese de doutorado está de acordo com as seguintes normas, em vigor no momento desta publicação: Referências: adaptado de International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (Vancouver). Guia de apresentação e dissertações, teses e monografias. Elaborado por Anneliese Cordeiro da Cunha, Maria Julia de A.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Luseogliflozin on Bone Microarchitecture in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Effect of luseogliozin on bone microarchitecture in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial using second- generation high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) Ai Haraguchi Nagasaki Daigaku https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0671-2530 Riyoko Shigeno Nagasaki Daigaku Ichiro Horie ( [email protected] ) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3430-5796 Shimpei Morimoto Nagasaki Daigaku Ayako Ito Nagasaki Daigaku Ko Chiba Nagasaki Daigaku Yurika Kawazoe Nagasaki Daigaku Shigeki Tashiro Nagasaki Daigaku Junya Miyamoto Nagasaki Daigaku Shuntaro Sato Nagasaki Daigaku Hiroshi Yamamoto Nagasaki Daigaku Makoto Osaki Nagasaki Daigaku Atsushi Kawakami Nagasaki Daigaku Norio Abiru Nagasaki Daigaku Page 1/18 Study protocol Keywords: type 2 diabetes, luseogliozin, SGLT2 inhibitor, HR-pQCT, fracture, bone Posted Date: September 6th, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.14017/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published at Trials on May 5th, 2020. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04276-4. Page 2/18 Abstract Background Elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of bone fracture independent of their bone mineral density (BMD), which is explained mainly by the deteriorated bone quality in T2DM compared to non-diabetic adults. Sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors have been studied in several trials in T2DM, and the Canagliozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study showed an increased fracture risk related to treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor canagliozin, although no evidence of increased fracture risk with treatment with other SGLT2 inhibitors has been reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Antidiabetic Drugs in NAFLD: the Accomplishment of Two Goals at Once?
    pharmaceuticals Review Antidiabetic Drugs in NAFLD: The Accomplishment of Two Goals at Once? Matteo Tacelli , Ciro Celsa , Bianca Magro, Aurora Giannetti, Grazia Pennisi, Federica Spatola and Salvatore Petta * Sezione di Gastroenterologia e Epatologia, DiBiMIS, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] (M.T.); [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (B.M.); [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (G.P.); [email protected] (F.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected], Tel.: +39-091-655-2170; Fax: +39-091-655-2156 Received: 17 October 2018; Accepted: 3 November 2018; Published: 8 November 2018 Abstract: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in Western countries, accounting for 20–30% of general population and reaching a prevalence of 55% in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Insulin resistance plays a key role in pathogenic mechanisms of NAFLD. Many drugs have been tested but no medications have yet been approved. Antidiabetic drugs could have a role in the progression reduction of the disease. The aim of this review is to summarize evidence on efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs in patients with NAFLD. Metformin, a biguanide, is the most frequently used drug in the treatment of T2DM. To date 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four meta-analysis on the use of metformin in NAFLD are available. No significant improvement in histological liver fibrosis was shown, but it can be useful in the treatment of co-factors of NAFLD, like body weight, transaminase or cholesterol levels, and HbA1c levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events Associated with Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: a Meta-Analysis
    Online Supplementary Content Palmer SC, Mavridis D, Nicolucci A, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with glucose-lowering drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.9400. eMethods. Summary of Statistical Analysis eTable 1. Search Strategies eTable 2. Description of Included Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy eTable 3. Description of Included Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Dual Therapy Added to Metformin eTable 4. Description of Included Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Triple Therapy When Added to Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea eTable 5. Risks of Bias in Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy eTable 6. Risks of Bias in Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Dual Therapy Added to Metformin eTable 7. Risks of Bias in Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Triple Therapy When Added to Metformin plus Sulfonylurea eTable 8. Estimated Global Inconsistency in Networks of Outcomes eTable 9. Estimated Heterogeneity in Networks eTable 10. Definitions of Treatment Failure Outcome eTable 11. Contributions of Direct Evidence to the Networks of Treatments eTable 12. Network Meta-analysis Estimates of Comparative Treatment Associations for Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy eTable 13. Network Meta-analysis Estimates of Comparative Treatment Associations for Drug Classes When Used in Dual Therapy (in Addition to Metformin) eTable 14. Network Meta-analysis Estimates of Comparative Treatment Effects for Drug Classes Given as Triple Therapy eTable 15. Meta-regression Analyses for Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy (Compared With Metformin) eTable 16. Subgroup Analyses of Individual Sulfonylurea Drugs (as Monotherapy) on Hypoglycemia eTable 17.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sodium Glucose Cotransporter Type 2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Preserves B-Cell Mass and Restores Glucose Homeostasis in the Male Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rat
    1521-0103/350/3/657–664$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.114.213454 THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS J Pharmacol Exp Ther 350:657–664, September 2014 Copyright ª 2014 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics The Sodium Glucose Cotransporter Type 2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Preserves b-Cell Mass and Restores Glucose Homeostasis in the Male Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rat Henrik H. Hansen, Jacob Jelsing, Carl Frederik Hansen, Gitte Hansen, Niels Vrang, Michael Mark, Thomas Klein, and Eric Mayoux Gubra, Hørsholm, Denmark (H.H.H., J.J., C.F.H., G.H., N.V.); and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Biberach, Germany (M.M., T.K., E.M.) Received January 22, 2014; accepted July 2, 2014 Downloaded from ABSTRACT Type 2 diabetes is characterized by impaired b-cell function at week 8 of treatment compared with week 4, those of empagliflozin associated with progressive reduction of insulin secretion and remained stable throughout the study period. Similarly, empagliflozin b -cell mass. Evidently, there is an unmet need for treatments improved glucose tolerance and preserved insulin secretion jpet.aspetjournals.org with greater sustainability in b-cell protection and antidiabetic after both 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. These effects were efficacy. Through an insulin and b cell–independent mechanism, reflected by less reduction in b-cell mass with empagliflozin or empagliflozin, a specific sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 liraglutide at week 4, whereas only empagliflozin showed b-cell (SGLT-2) inhibitor, may potentially provide longer efficacy. This sparing effects also at week 8. Although this study cannot be study compared the antidiabetic durability of empagliflozin treat- used to dissociate the absolute antidiabetic efficacy among ment (10 mg/kg p.o.) against glibenclamide (3 mg/kg p.o.) and the different mechanisms of drug action, the study demon- liraglutide (0.2 mg/kg s.c.) on deficient glucose homeostasis and strates that empagliflozin exerts a more sustained improve- b-cell function in Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Use of a Registered Medical Practitioner Or a Hospital Or a Laboratory Only TENELIGLIPTIN, PIOGLITAZONE HYDROCHLORIDE AN
    For the use of a Registered Medical Practitioner or a Hospital or a Laboratory only TENELIGLIPTIN, PIOGLITAZONE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROLONGED RELEASE METFORMIN HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS 1. THE DRUG SHOULD BE USED AT FIRST LINE OF THERAPY FOR DIABETES. 2. ADVICE FOR HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS • Patients with active bladder cancer or with a history of bladder cancer and those with uninvestigated haematuria should not receive pioglitazone. • Prescribers should review the safety and efficacy of pioglitazone in individuals after 3-6 month of treatment to ensure that only patients who are deriving benefit continue to be treated. Pioglitazone should be stopped in patients who do not respond adequately to treatment (e.g. reduction in Glycosylated haemoglobin HbA1C). • Before starting pioglitazone, the following known risk factors for development of bladder cancer should be assessed in individuals: age, current or past history of smoking, exposure to some occupational or chemotherapy agents such as cyclophosphamide, or previous irradiation of the pelvic region. • Use in elderly patients should be considered carefully before and during treatment because the risk of bladder cancer increases with age. Elderly patients should start on the lowest possible dose and be regularly monitored because of the risks of bladder cancer and heart failure associated with pioglitazone. COMPOSITION Each uncoated bilayered tablet contains: . 20 mg (InTeneligliptin Prolonged IP release .………………………..……………….. form) PioglitazoneMetformin Hydrochloride Hydrochloride IP IP …………………..…... equivalent to mg Pio . 15 mg .s Colour:glitazone Quinoline ………………………….…………………… Yellow Excipients ………………………….……………………..... q CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Biotenly®-MP contains three oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs teneligliptin, pioglitazone and metformin hydrochloride used in the management of type-2 diabetes (NIDDM). MECHANISM OF ACTION/PHARMACODYNEMICS Teneligliptin is a DPP-4 inhibitor, which is believed to exert its actions in patients with type 2 diabetes by slowing the inactivation of incretin hormones.
    [Show full text]
  • IJBCP International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology the Observational, Cross-Sectional Study of Drug Utilization
    Print ISSN: 2319-2003 | Online ISSN: 2279-0780 IJBCP International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20194771 Original Research Article The observational, cross-sectional study of drug utilization 90% and use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Prashant P. Shivgunde1*, Shantanu R. Joshi2, Archana D. Kodilkar1 1Department of University Research, Maharashtra ABSTRACT University of Health Sciences (MUHS), Mhasrul, Vani- Background: Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disease which affects the quality Dindori Road, Nashik, of life. It leads to multiple complications due to metabolic involvement. Out of Maharashtra, India multiple drugs used to treat diabetes, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors 2 Global Herbs Pharmaceuticals, are comparatively new drugs used for type-2-diabetes mellitus (DM) treatment. Pune-Satara Road, Pune, This study aimed to find out the drug utilization (DU) 90% and use of DPP-4 Maharashtra, India inhibitors in patients with type-2-DM. Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at Received: 28 September 2019 a private healthcare clinic of an endocrinologist in Nashik. Type-2-DM patients Revised: 11 October 2019 of both sexes were selected and a total of 199 patients were enrolled in the Accepted: 14 October 2019 study. The consented patients were interviewed and prescription copies were collected. After studying them; statistical analysis was done and results and *Correspondence to: conclusions were drawn. Dr. Prashant P. Shivgunde, Results: Out of total prescribed drugs, 58.77% of drugs were anti-diabetics. It Email: prashantshivgunde@ was observed that the biguanides were most frequently (25.32%) prescribed gmail.com while the least prescribed drugs were meglitinide analogues (0.08%).
    [Show full text]