1. C) Amendments to Articles 10, 16, 17, 18, 20, 28, 31 and 32 of the Convention on the International Maritime Organization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1. C) Amendments to Articles 10, 16, 17, 18, 20, 28, 31 and 32 of the Convention on the International Maritime Organization 1. c) Amendments to articles 10, 16, 17, 18, 20, 28, 31 and 32 of the Convention on the International Maritime Organization London, 17 October 1974 ENTRY. INTO FORCE: 1 April 1978, in accordance with article 52 of the Convention, for all Members of the Organization*. REGISTRATION: 1 April 1978, No. 4214. STATUS: Parties*. TEXT: United Nations, Treaty Series , vol. 1080, p. 375. Note: See " Note: " at beginning of chapter XII.1. The amendments were adopted by the Assembly of the Organization by resolution A.315 (ES.V) of 17 October 1974. Pursuant to article 54 of the Convention, the acceptance of an amendment shall be made by the communication of an instrument to the Secretary-General of the Organization for deposit with the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Following is the list of States which had accepted the Amendments to the Convention prior to their entry into force. In accordance with article 52 of the Convention, the Assembly of the International Maritime Consultative Organization determined that these amendments were of such a nature that any Member which hereafter declares that it did not accept such amendments and within a period of twelve months after they had come into force would, upon the expiration of this period, cease to be a Party to the Convention. *See chapter XII.1 for the complete list of Participants, Members of the International Maritime Organization, for which the above amendments are in force, pursuant to article 71 of the Convention as amended. Participant1 Acceptance(A) Participant1 Acceptance(A) Algeria ......................................................... 8 Mar 1976 A Finland.........................................................19 Oct 1976 A Angola ......................................................... 6 Jun 1977 A France ..........................................................24 Mar 1975 A Austria ......................................................... 1 Mar 1977 A Gabon...........................................................15 Nov 1977 A Bahamas.......................................................31 Jan 1977 A Germany3,4 ................................................... 1 Dec 1975 A Bahrain2 .......................................................22 Sep 1976 A Ghana...........................................................18 Oct 1976 A Barbados ......................................................30 Jun 1975 A Greece..........................................................16 May 1977 A Belgium ....................................................... 6 Jul 1976 A Guinea.......................................................... 1 Apr 1977 A Brazil ...........................................................30 Jul 1976 A Guinea-Bissau.............................................. 6 Dec 1977 A Bulgaria .......................................................16 Apr 1975 A Hungary .......................................................30 Dec 1976 A Cabo Verde..................................................24 Aug 1976 A Iceland .........................................................13 May 1976 A Cameroon..................................................... 1 Nov 1976 A India.............................................................16 Jan 1976 A Canada .........................................................16 Jul 1975 A Indonesia......................................................23 Nov 1976 A Chile.............................................................11 Feb 1976 A Iran (Islamic Republic of)............................ 8 Jul 1975 A China............................................................28 Apr 1975 A Iraq5 .............................................................11 Mar 1976 A Cuba.............................................................24 Nov 1975 A Israel5 ........................................................... 8 Sep 1976 A Cyprus..........................................................24 Feb 1976 A Italy..............................................................13 May 1976 A Denmark ......................................................20 Jul 1976 A Jordan........................................................... 5 Apr 1977 A Dominican Republic....................................30 Dec 1976 A Liberia.......................................................... 8 Sep 1975 A Ecuador........................................................ 3 Jan 1977 A Libya............................................................30 Jul 1976 A Egypt............................................................16 Nov 1976 A Madagascar..................................................29 Dec 1975 A Ethiopia........................................................ 2 Aug 1977 A Maldives ......................................................21 Jul 1975 A XII 1 C. NAVIGATION 1 Participant1 Acceptance(A) Participant1 Acceptance(A) Malta............................................................ 2 Nov 1976 A Russian Federation ......................................28 Apr 1975 A Mexico.........................................................23 Mar 1976 A Saudi Arabia ................................................23 Mar 1977 A Morocco6 .....................................................17 Sep 1976 A Singapore.....................................................18 Jan 1977 A Netherlands7.................................................10 Nov 1975 A Spain ............................................................24 Mar 1975 A New Zealand................................................24 Mar 1976 A Sri Lanka......................................................17 May 1976 A Nigeria .........................................................30 Jun 1976 A Suriname......................................................26 Nov 1976 A Norway ........................................................28 Apr 1975 A Sweden......................................................... 5 May 1975 A Oman ...........................................................17 Nov 1976 A Switzerland ..................................................16 Jan 1976 A Pakistan........................................................13 May 1976 A Syrian Arab Republic ..................................25 Mar 1977 A Panama.........................................................23 May 1975 A Thailand....................................................... 1 Dec 1975 A Peru..............................................................17 Nov 1976 A Trinidad and Tobago ...................................16 May 1975 A Poland ..........................................................15 Mar 1976 A Tunisia .........................................................13 May 1976 A Portugal........................................................24 Oct 1977 A United Kingdom of Great Britain and Qatar ............................................................19 May 1977 A Northern Ireland.....................................26 Jun 1975 A Republic of Korea........................................ 8 Nov 1976 A United Republic of Tanzania.......................28 Sep 1976 A Romania.......................................................25 Jul 1977 A United States of America.............................11 Feb 1976 A Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)............27 Oct 1975 A Notes: 1 The former Yugoslavia had accepted the amendments on purposes of the Organization. That pronouncement by the 30 March 1976. See also note 1 under “Bosnia and Government of Bahrain cannot in any way affect whatever Herzegovina", "Croatia", "former Yugoslavia", "Slovenia", "The obligations are binding upon Bahrain, under general Former Yugsoslav Republic of Macedonia" and "Yugoslavia" in international law or under particular treaties." the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume. The Government of Israel will, insofar as concerns the substance of the matter, adopt towards the Government of 2 On 8 July 2021, the Government of Bahrain notified the Bahrain an attitude of complete reciprocity." Secretary-General of its withdrawal of the following reservation made upon acceptance: 3 The German Democratic Republic had deposited its instrument of acceptance of the amendments with the Secretary- “The acceptance of the Convention on the Inter-Governmental General of the International Maritime Organization on 18 Maritime Consultative Organization by the State of Bahrain September 1975 and with the Secretary-General of the United shall, however, in no way signify recognition of, or entry into Nations on 30 September 1975. See also note 2 under any relations with Israel.” “Germany” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume. Upon depositing its instrument of acceptance of the amendments, the Government of Bahrain reiterated the same 4 See note 1 under “Germany” regarding Berlin (West) in declaration as the one made upon accceptance of the Convention the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this (see chapter XII.1). volume. In a communication received by the Secretary-General on 5 With the following declaration: 8 November 1976, the Government of Bahrain confirmed that the general reservation is intended to constitute a general Acceptance of the above amendments by the Republic of Iraq declaration of policy of the Government of the State of Bahrain shall, however, in no way signify recognition of Israel or be and should not be interpreted as expanding or diminishing the conducive to entry into any relations with it. scope of the Convention or its application to States parties
Recommended publications
  • A/58/307 General Assembly
    United Nations A/58/307 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 August 2003 Original: English Fifty-eighth session Item 119 (a) of the provisional agenda* Human rights questions: implementation of human rights instruments Status of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Optional Protocols to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Report of the Secretary-General** Summary The General Assembly, by its resolution 2200 A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, adopted and opened for signature, ratification or accession the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and expressed the hope that the Covenants and the Optional Protocol would be signed, ratified or acceded to without delay. The Assembly also requested the Secretary-General to submit to it at its future sessions reports concerning the status of ratification of the Covenants and of the Optional Protocol. In response to that request, reports on the status of the International Covenants and the Optional Protocol have been submitted annually to the Assembly since its twenty-second session in 1967. Both Covenants and the Optional Protocol were opened for signature at New York on 19 December 1966. In accordance with their respective provisions,1 the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights entered into force on 3 January 1976, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights entered * A/58/150. ** The footnote requested by the General Assembly in resolution 58/248 was not included in the submission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labor Force Experience of Women from 'Generation X'
    Women from ‘‘Generation X' The labor force experience of women from ‘Generation X’ Women aged 25 to 34 years in 2000 participated in the labor force in greater proportions, were more educated, earned more, and generally enjoyed more labor market benefits than their counterparts 25 years earlier; moreover, the “earnings gap” between young women and men narrowed substantially over the period Marisa DiNatale uring the 1960s and 1970s, legislation years had completed 4 or more years of col- and and changing social mores dramatically lege, compared with 18 percent 25 years Stephanie Boraas Daltered the choices young women had earlier. about their futures. Girls growing up during this • Young women have substantially closed period were influenced both by the conventions the “earnings gap” with their male coun- of their parents’ generation and by the new op- terparts since 1979 (the first year for which portunities that were becoming available to them. comparable earnings data are available In contrast, girls born in later years grew up in an from the CPS). They earned 82 percent as era in which women often were expected to com- much as young men in 2000 for full-time bine market work1 with family responsibilities. work, compared with 68 percent in 1979. Consequently, women who were aged 25 to 34 years in 2000 had a markedly different relation- • Married women aged 25 to 34 years—par- ship to the labor market than did their counter- ticularly those who had children—were far parts in 1975. more likely to be in the labor force in 2000 The first part of this article focuses on the than 25 years earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. D) Amendments to Articles 34 and 55 of the Constitution of the World Health Organization Geneva, 22 May 1973 .ENTRY INTO
    1. d) Amendments to articles 34 and 55 of the Constitution of the World Health Organization Geneva, 22 May 1973 ENTRY. INTO FORCE: 3 February 1977, in accordance with article 73 of the Constitution, for all members of the World Health Organization*. REGISTRATION: 3 February 1977, No. 221. STATUS: Parties* TEXT: United Nations, Treaty Series , vol. 1035, p. 315. Note: The amendments to articles 34 and 55 of the Constitution of the World Health Organization were adopted by the Twenty-sixth World Health Assembly by resolution WHA 26.37 of 22 May 1973. In accordance with article 73 of the Constitution, amendments come into force for all Members when adopted by a two- thirds vote of the Health Assembly and accepted by two-thirds of the Members in accordance with their respective constitutional processes. Following is the list of States which had accepted the amendments prior to the entry into force of the Amendments. *See chapter IX.1 for the complete list of Participants, Members of the World Health Organization, for which the above amendments are in force, pursuant to article 73 of the Constitution. Participant1 Acceptance(A) Participant1 Acceptance(A) Afghanistan..................................................28 Feb 1975 A El Salvador ..................................................17 Oct 1975 A Argentina ..................................................... 4 Oct 1976 A Eswatini .......................................................18 Nov 1975 A Australia.......................................................11 Mar 1975 A Ethiopia.......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Reports of the United States Court of Military Appeals and The
    ANNUAL REPORT of the U. S. COURT OF MILITARY APPEALS ond the JUDGE ADVOCATES GENERAL of the ARMED FORCES ond the GENERAL COUNSEL of the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PURSUANT TO THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE For the Period Jonuory I, 1976-December 31, 1976 PROPERTY OF U.S. ARMY T~E JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S SCHOOL LIBRARY ANNUAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE COMMITTEES ON ARMED SERVICES of the SENATE AND OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and to the SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION and the SECRETARIES OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AND AIR FORCE PURSUANT TO THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE For the Period January I, 1976-December 31, 1976 Contents JOINT REPORT OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF MILITARY APPEALS AND THE JUDGE ADVOCATES GENERAL OF THE ARMED FORCES AND THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANS­ PORTATION REPORT OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OFMILITARY APPEALS REPORT OF THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE ARMY REPORT OF THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY REPORT OF THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE AIR FORCE REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANS­ PORTATION (UNITED STATES COAST GUARD) JOINT REPORT of the u.s. COURT OF MILITARY APPEALS and the JUDGE ADVOCATES GENERAL OF THE ARMED FORCES and the GENERAL COUNSEL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION January 1, 1976 to December 31,1976 As required by Article 67(g), Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Judges of the United States Court of Military Appeals, The Judge Advocates General of the military departments, and the General Counsel of the Department of Transportation, submit their annual report on the operation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice to the Committees on Armed Services of the United States Senate and House of Representatives and to the Secretaries of Defense, Trans­ portation, Army, Navy, and Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Median and Average Sales Prices of New Homes Sold in United States
    Median and Average Sales Prices of New Homes Sold in United States Period Median Average Jan 1963 $17,200 (NA) Feb 1963 $17,700 (NA) Mar 1963 $18,200 (NA) Apr 1963 $18,200 (NA) May 1963 $17,500 (NA) Jun 1963 $18,000 (NA) Jul 1963 $18,400 (NA) Aug 1963 $17,800 (NA) Sep 1963 $17,900 (NA) Oct 1963 $17,600 (NA) Nov 1963 $18,400 (NA) Dec 1963 $18,700 (NA) Jan 1964 $17,800 (NA) Feb 1964 $18,000 (NA) Mar 1964 $19,000 (NA) Apr 1964 $18,800 (NA) May 1964 $19,300 (NA) Jun 1964 $18,800 (NA) Jul 1964 $19,100 (NA) Aug 1964 $18,900 (NA) Sep 1964 $18,900 (NA) Oct 1964 $18,900 (NA) Nov 1964 $19,300 (NA) Dec 1964 $21,000 (NA) Jan 1965 $20,700 (NA) Feb 1965 $20,400 (NA) Mar 1965 $19,800 (NA) Apr 1965 $19,900 (NA) May 1965 $19,600 (NA) Jun 1965 $19,800 (NA) Jul 1965 $21,000 (NA) Aug 1965 $20,200 (NA) Sep 1965 $19,600 (NA) Oct 1965 $19,900 (NA) Nov 1965 $20,600 (NA) Dec 1965 $20,300 (NA) Jan 1966 $21,200 (NA) Feb 1966 $20,900 (NA) Mar 1966 $20,800 (NA) Apr 1966 $23,000 (NA) May 1966 $22,300 (NA) Jun 1966 $21,200 (NA) Jul 1966 $21,800 (NA) Aug 1966 $20,700 (NA) Sep 1966 $22,200 (NA) Oct 1966 $20,800 (NA) Nov 1966 $21,700 (NA) Dec 1966 $21,700 (NA) Jan 1967 $22,200 (NA) Page 1 of 13 Median and Average Sales Prices of New Homes Sold in United States Period Median Average Feb 1967 $22,400 (NA) Mar 1967 $22,400 (NA) Apr 1967 $22,300 (NA) May 1967 $23,700 (NA) Jun 1967 $23,900 (NA) Jul 1967 $23,300 (NA) Aug 1967 $21,700 (NA) Sep 1967 $22,800 (NA) Oct 1967 $22,300 (NA) Nov 1967 $23,100 (NA) Dec 1967 $22,200 (NA) Jan 1968 $23,400 (NA) Feb 1968 $23,500 (NA) Mar 1968
    [Show full text]
  • Sahara Occidental Western Sahara
    COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES SAHARA OCCIDENTAL (REQUÊTE POUR AVIS CONSULTATIF) ORDONNANCE DU 22 MAI 1975 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS WESTERN SAHARA (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION) ORDER OF 22 MAY 1975 Mode officiel de citation: Sahara occidental, ordonnance du 22 mai 1975, C.I.J. Reclieil 1975, p. 6. Official citation : Western Sahara, Order of 22 May 1975, I.C.J. Reports 1975, p. 6. sales numbe-41 1 No de vente: INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE YEAR 1975 1975 22 May 22 May 1975 General List No. 61 WESTERN SAHARA (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION) ORDER Present: President LACHS; Vice-President AMMOUN;Judges FORSTER, GROS,BENGZON, PETRÉN, ONYEAMA, DILLARD, IGNACIO-PINTO, DE CASTRO,MOROZOV, JIMÉNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA,Sir Humphrey WALDOCK,NAGENDRA SINGH, RUDA; Registrar AQUARONE. Composed as above, After deliberation, Having regard to Articles 31 and 68 of the Statute of the Court, and to Articles 3, 87 and 89 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to resolution 3292 (XXIX) of the General Assenibly of the United Nations dated 13 December 1974 requesting the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on the following questions: "1. Was Western Sahara (Rio de Oro and Sakiet El Hamra) at the time of colonization by Spain a territory belonging to no one (terra nullius)? If the answer to the first question is in the negative, II. What were the legal ties between this territory and the Kingdom of Morocco and the Mauritanian entity?" 4 Makes
    [Show full text]
  • List of Technical Papers
    Program Reports Report Title Copies Number Number 1: Program Prospectus. December 1963. 2 Program Design Report. February 1965. 2 Number 2: Supplement: 1968-1969 Work Program. February 1968. 1 Supplement: 1969-1970 Work Program. May 1969. 0 Number 3: Cost Accounting Manual. February 1965. 1 Number 4: Organizational Manual. February 1965. 2 Guide Plan: Central Offices for the Executive Branch of State Number 5: 2 Government. April1966. XIOX Users Manual for the IBM 7090/7094 Computer. November Number 6: 2 1966. Population Projections for the State of Rhode Island and its Number 7: 2 Municipalities--1970-2000. December 1966. Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space (Interim Report). Number 8: 2 February 1968. Rhode Island Transit Plan: Future Mass Transit Services and Number 9: 2 Facilities. June 1969. Plan for the Development and Use of Public Water Supplies. Number 10: 1 September 1969. Number 11: Plan for Public Sewerage Facility Development. September 1969. 2 Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space (Second Interim Number 12: 2 Report). May 1970. Number 13: Historic Preservation Plan. September 1970. 2 Number 14: Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space. January 1971. 2 Number 15: A Department of Transportation for Rhode Island. March 1971. 2 State Airport System Plan (1970-1990). Revised Summary Report. Number 16: 2 December 1974. Number 17: Westerly Economic Growth Center, Planning Study. February 1973. 1 Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space--Supplement. June Number 18: 2 1973. Number 19: Rhode Island Transportation Plan--1990. January 1975. 2 Number 20: Solid Waste Management Plan. December 1973. 2 1 Number 21: Report of the Trail Advisory Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stock Market and the Economy
    BARRY BOSWORTH Brookings Institution The Stock Market and the Economy THE STOCKMARKET decline of 1973-74 marked the longest and steepest fall in corporate-stockprices since the depressionof the 1930s.The loss of stockholderwealth in marketprices amounted to $525 billion, or 43 per- cent.'The magnitudeof this declinein stockvalues, in conjunctionwith the subsequentcollapse of aggregatedemand in 1974-75, has sparkeda re- newed discussionof the role of the stock marketin businesscycles. The debate-as is so frequentlythe case-is not new to economics.Several sig- nificantcontributions recently made at both the conceptualand empirical levels seem, however,to justify a reexaminationof the issues. The disputeabout the import of changesin the stock marketrevolves around their causal role in economicfluctuation: Are they a source of variationin aggregatedemand? Does the causationrun solely in the op- posite direction?Or do the levels of economicactivity and of stock prices simplyrespond similarly to other,more basic, economic forces, with no di- rect causal link betweenthe two? This third interpretationis consistent with a view that the stock marketreflects investors' attempts to forecast economictrends. The fact that movementsin stock prices foretellmajor Note: I am gratefulto LeonardHerk for researchaid in writingthis article.Members of the Brookingspanel offeredvaluable comments and suggestionsin the preparationof the draft. David A. Wyss of the Federal Reserve Board staff provided the computer simulationsof the MPS model and answerednumerous questions. 1. Derived as the change between December 1972 and December 1974, as shown in Board of Governorsof the FederalReserve System, unpublisheddetail accounts, from the flow of funds (July 1975). 257 258 BrookingsPapers on EconomicActivity, 2:1975 cyclesin businessactivity is, thus, only evidencethat investors'forecasts are betterthan randomguesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Coun(
    UNITED NATIONS Distr. ECONOMIC GENEML AND E/CN.4/1279 5 January'1978 SOCIAL COUN( Originals ENGLISH COMMISSION ON HUMN RIGHTS Thirty-fourth session Item 19 of the provisional agenda STATUS OP THE INTERlíATIONAL COVENANTS ON HUMâN RIGHTS Note Ъу the Secretary-General 1. At its thirty-third session, the Commission on Human Rights had before it a note by the Secretary-General (E/CN.4/1227) on the status of the International Covenant on Economic,"Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 2. In its resolution 2 (XXXIIl) of .18 February 1977 the Commission on Human Rights welcomed with deep satisfaction the entry into force of the International Covenant on Economic, - Social an.d Cultural Rights, the International Covenant.on Civil and Political Rights and the Optional Protocol to the latter Covenant. The Commission called upon all States to take legislative or other measures for the realization of the human rights and fundamental freedoms provided for in the Covenants, invited the States parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to consider making the declaration provided for in article 4I of that Covenant and requested the Secretary-General to continue to inform the Commission on Human Rights at each session of any new developments with regard to ratification and implemiontation of the International Covenants on Human Rights and the Optional Protocol. The present note was prepared in response to ..that request. 3. Before the adoption by the Commission of resolution 2(XXXIIl), Guyana had ratified both Covenants, on 15 February 1977, Since then, the two Covenants were ratified by Panama on 8 March 1977, Poland on 18 March 1977 and Spain on 27 April 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • 1979 Death Index Rocky Mountain News and the Denver Post Name Date Page(S), Sec
    Denver Public Library 1975 - 1979 Death Index Rocky Mountain News and The Denver Post Name Date Page(s), Sec. Publication A's Abbot, George 02 Apr 1979 124 RMN Abbot, George 04 Apr 1979 26 DP Abbott, Allen G. 11 Jul 1975 19 DP Abbott, Bruce A. 20 Apr 1979 165 RMN Abbott, Bruce Arnold 19 Apr 1979 43 DP Abbott, Elwood Wilbur 14 Jun 1978 139 RMN Abbott, Elwood Wilbur 18 Jun 1978 47 DP Abbott, Gertrude J. 27 Apr 1976 31 DP Abbott, Jean Dyer 25 Feb 1976 20 DP Abbott, Orin J. 06 May 1978 136 RMN Abbott, Orin J. 06 May 1978 33 DP Abbott, Ruth L. 28 Nov 1977 12 DP Abdoo, Paul John Sr. 14 Dec 1977 49 DP Abel, Paul J. 12 May 1975 16 DP Abell, J. Catherine 09 Mar 1978 149 RMN Abell, J. Catherine 10 Mar 1978 52 DP Abelt, Clara S. 08 Jun 1977 123 RMN Abelt, Clara S. 09 Jun 1977 27 DP Abernatha, Martie Park Mrs. 03 Dec 1976 37 DP Ables, Anna Coulson 08 Nov 1978 74 DP Abrahamson, Selma R. 05 Nov 1979 130 RMN Abrahamson, Selma R. 05 Nov 1979 18 DP Acevedo, Homero E. Dr. 01 Apr 1978 15 DP Ackerman, Maurice Kent 11 May 1978 44 DP Acosta, Pete P. 02 Aug 1977 103 RMN Acree, Jessee Leonard 07 Mar 1978 97 RMN Acsell, F. Robert Rev. 20 Dec 1976 123 RMN Acsell, F. Robert Rev. 20 Dec 1976 20 DP Adair, Jense Jane 25 Nov 1977 40 DP Adair, Ollie S.
    [Show full text]
  • As at 14 March 2008 Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971
    As at 14 March 2008 Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971 Entry into force: 16 August 1976, in accordance with article 26 (1) which reads as follows: “1. The Convention shall come into force on the ninetieth day after forty of the States referred to in paragraph 1 of article 25 have signed it without reservation of ratification or have deposited their instruments of ratification or accession. 2. For any other State signing without reservation of ratification, or depositing an instrument of ratification or accession after the last signature or deposit referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Convention shall enter into force on the ninetieth day following the date of its signature or deposit of its instrument of ratification or accession.” Status: Signatories: 34, Parties: 183. Note: The Convention was adopted and opened for signature by the United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a Protocol on Psychotropic Substances, held at Vienna from 11 January to 21 1 February 1971. The Conference was convened pursuant to resolution 1474 (XLVIII) of 24 March 1970 of the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. Definitive signature (s), Ratification, Participant Signature Accession (a), Succession (d) Afghanistan 21 May 1985 a Albania 24 Jan 2003 a Algeria 14 Jul 1978 a Andorra 13 Feb 2007 a Angola 26 Oct 2005 a Antigua and Barbuda 5 Apr 1993 a 21 Feb Argentina 16 Feb 1978 1971 Armenia 13 Sep 1993 a 23 Dec Australia 19 May 1982 1971 Austria 23 Jun 1997 a Azerbaijan 11 Jan 1999 a Bahamas 31 Aug 1987 a Bahrain 7 Feb 1990 a Bangladesh
    [Show full text]
  • W., WESTFIELD • 232-87172 Tenance for a 13-Mile Section Financed with 70 Percent CHRISTMAS HOUIU NFWAW
    a» r- 16 > i- - < ~i ct a z n < •-< o o _i<^ -i THE WESTFIELD LEADER pq ill O •"• "UlL The Leading and Most Widely Circulated Weekly Newspaper In Union County _l l- ?q in to 3 rj UJ Q. <r 3 Second Cliu Poitoga Pall Published EIGH \.R — NO. 18 at WeitfltM, NT J. WESTFIELD, NEW JERSEY, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 11. 1975 Bvury Thursday 32 Pages—15 Cents Action Stalled on Attendant Parking Lot Bowing to an appeal to local businessman and reconsider the use of former member of the Town Parking Lot No. 4, behind Council, and Frank King, East Broad St. stores from executive director of the Elm St. to Mountain Ave., Westfield Area Chamber of the Town Council Tuesday Commerce, who recom- night tabled nctjon on a mended further study of the $14,500 appropriation to use of Lot No. 4 which they implement a trinl period for fell preferable to the Elmer attendant parking on Lot St. tract for the trial. No. 5 off Rimer St. Both claimed that a Councilman Thomas greater revenue return Pluta was the lone would be gained from use of dissenting member in voting an umnetercd lot in the Elm for the delay. SI. lot which has 40 more Council action followed an spaces than the Elmer St. appeal by Morris Knmler, a location and is adjacent to more stores. Their views were supported by Coun- Four Appeals cilman Allen Chin, chair- man of the parking and Before Zone Bd. transportation committee of the council, who said that The appeal of Cornwall Lot No.
    [Show full text]