Int Gtr338 058 065.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Int Gtr338 058 065.Pdf This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Invasion of Alien Annuals and Ecological Consequences in Salt Desert Shrublands of Western Utah Kimball T. Harper Renee Van Buren Stanley G. Kitchen Abstract-Vegetation plots in experimentally grazed pastures at species on better managed ranges. In years of above-average the Desert Experimental Range in west-central Utah have been precipitation, native annual species such as sixweeks grama mapped periodically since 1935. The pastures have been grazed at (Bouteloua barbata), Hooker's eriogonum (Eriogonum the same intensity and in the same season by sheep from 1935 to the hookeri), Palmer's buckwheat (E. palmerianum), thymeleaf present. Records show that Bromus tectorum and Salsola pestifer spurge (Euphorbia serpyllifolia), broadlobe gilia (Gilia were observed on mapped plots in 1958, although the latter species hutchinsifolia), western stickseed (Lappula occidentalis), was reported from the range in 1937. Halogeton glomeratus ap­ desert pepperplant (Lepidium montanum var. montanum), peared first in 1969. All of these species had become common on both false buffalograss (Munroa squarrosa), and crenulate grazed and ungrazed plots by 1989, although plant density and phacelia' (Phacelia crenulata) were a conspicuous part of the vigor of these aliens were reduced on ungrazed sites. Frequency of vegetation prior to the advent of aggressive alien annuals. occurrence of these species has increased steadily since their first Long-term (1951-1980) precipitation records at the DER appearance. Experimental studies suggest that soils from areas show an average annual total of 6.12 inches. Average annual 0 dominated by Halogeton and Salsola are associated with lower temperature for that period was 49.0 OF with means of 26.4 survival of Ceratoides lanata seedlings than soils from healthy and 73.8° for January and July, respectively. About 53% of Ceratoides stands. the annual precipitation was received during the growing season (May 1 and Sept. 30) in the period 1951 to 1980 (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1982). The Desert Experimental Range (DER) is a 55,000 acre experimental area in Millard County, west-central Utah. Methods Sheep grazing trials were initiated there in experimental ----------------------------------- pastures in 1935 and have continued uninterrupted and The grazing trials considered here have been applied to 20 with only minor changes to the present (Clary and Holmgren fenced pastures (240-360 acres in size). Three grazinginten­ 1982). The grazing treatment design and early results were sities (arbitrarily referred to as light, moderate, or heavy) described by Hutchings and Stewart (1953). More recently, that have averaged about 10, 14, and 17 sheep days per acre grazing effects on shrubby species have been reported by have been applied to various pastures. Stocking rates have Harper and others (1990). This paper represents an attempt been varied annually within the foregoing limits depending to evaluate the role of annual plant species in the salt desert upon annual forage production in order to achieve a some­ shrublands that dominate the DER. Prior to this study what uniform degree of utilization from year-to-year for key annual species had been pooled together without reference forage species (Hutchings and Stewart 1953). Each grazing to individual species. Hutchings and Stewart (1953) show intensity class was applied in each ofthree seasons (Nov. 15- that all minor herbaceous species including annuals rarely Jan. 3, Jan. 4-Feb. 23, and Feb. 24-Apr. 10). Every grazing contributed more than 18% of the above ground production. intensity-season of use combination was replicated at least The vegetation under consideration was initially domi­ twice, except for moderate use in midwinter which is repre­ nated by shrubs, primarily shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia) sented but once in the research design. The preceding and winterfat (Cera to ides lanata). Perennial grasses includ­ statement assumes that split season use in which pastures ing Indian ricegrass (Stipa hymenoides), galleta grass are grazed in the early and midwinter season is not signifi­ (Hilariajamesii), three-awn (Aristida purpurea), and sand cantly different from early winter or midwinter grazing dropseed (Sporobolus cryptandrus) occur as subordinate alone. It is further assumed that any split season combina­ tion of early or midwinter use with late winter use does not differ significantly from late season grazing alone. Both of In: Barrow, Jerry R.; McArthur, E. Durant; Sosebee, Ronald E.; Tausch, the preceding assumptions are compatible with conclusions Robin J., comps. 1996. Proceedings: shrubland ecosystem dynamics in a drawn by Blaisdell and Holmgren (1984) and Harper and changing environment; 1995 May 23-25; Las Cruces, NM. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-338. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, others (1990). Anyone pasture has been grazed at the same Intermountain Research Station. intensity and in the same season throughout the 54 year Kimball T. Harper is Professor of Botany and Range Science, Department period covered by this study (1935-1989) (Hutchings and of Botany and Range Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84606. Renee Van Buren is Assistant Professor of Biology, Department of Biology, Stewart 1953). Utah Valley State College, Orem, UT 84058. Stanley G. Kitchen is Botanist, Two 1 acre exclosures were constructed in'16 of the 20 Shrub Sciences Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, pastures in 1935. Two permanently marked monitoring Intermountain Research Station, Provo, UT 84606. 58 plots were placed in each exclosure at time of construction. 1970 on winterfat seedling establishment. Surface soil These plots are 100 ft2 (5 ft by 20 ft) in area. At least two samples were collected from an area where flood waters additional plots were established at the same time on sites resulted in the death of winterfat in 1969. The dieoffarea is of comparable terrain, soils, and vegetation in grazed areas located in the southeast Y4 of section 11, T.25 S., R.17W. (the near each exclosure. Most plots in and adjacent to exclosures 4 unnumbered pastures, fig. 4 of Hutchings and Stewart were mapped in 1935 using a 1.0 ft2 grid marked offin .01 ft2 1953). A large stand of nearly pure winterfat occupied the subunits (Clary and Holmgren 1987). The mapping grid area prior to the flooding event. Minor local differences in frame was secured to heavy steel pegs permanently driven elevation resulted in the flood waters overflowing winterfat into the soil at the corners ofthe 100 ft2 monitoring plots. The plants on an irregularly shaped area across the extreme plots considered in this paper were chosen because they southeasterly corner of the quarter section of concern. The appeared to belong to a range site type with the potential of winterfat plants thus irrigated by the July 1969 flood greened supporting similar vegetation under uniform grazing use. up and grew vigorously until cold weather arrived in late The 48 plots used in this study were remapped periodically autumn. For unknown reasons, the flood irrigated plants did using the same procedures as in 1935 and a standardized not survive the 1969-70 winter. The dieoffarea was immedi­ form for recording results. The plots were reinventoried in ately invaded by halogeton and Russian thistle. Those spe­ 1935, 1936, 1937, 1959, 1968, 1975, and 1989. For our cies have continued to dominate the site from 1970 to the summary analyses, each map was subdivided into ten 2 ft x present. Although winterfat still exists in healthy stands 5 ft subunits. The number of individuals (density) of each along the margins of the dieoff area, that species has not annual plant species was determined for each 10.0 ft2 sub­ reoccupied the flooded area. plot for each year of record. Our summary analyses also In 1987, workers familiar with the dieoff event initiated a report the percentage of all 2 ft x 5 ft subplots that contain study to determine why winterfat was not reoccupying the any individuals of each species (frequency of occurrence). area from which it had been displaced. Soil samples (top 2.0 The location of plots and grazing treatments applied to the inches of the profile) were taken at 10 locations within the plots and subplots used in this paper are reported in table 1. dieoffzone and the adjacent, intact winterfat stands in May In an attempt to learn something ofthe separate effects of 1987. Subsamples were analyzed for texture, pH, electrical grazing intensity and season of grazing, all grazed plots are conductivity and exchangeable sodium by the Soil Analysis analyzed in two different ways. In a first analysis, plots were Laboratory, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, sorted into two groups: (1) light or moderate grazing inten­ Brigham Young University. The remainder of each soil sity with season of use being ignored and (2) heavy grazing sample was placed directly into 5.0 inch diameter, drained intensity again with season of use ignored. In a second pots for winterfat seeding trials under greenhouse condi­ analysis, all plots were sorted into two groups: (1) plots tions. Seed used for these initial trials was obtained from grazed in early or midwinter or (2) plots grazed in late field collections at the DER. winter. These groupings were suggested by results of earlier We also attempted to determine whether
Recommended publications
  • Plant List Lomatium Mohavense Mojave Parsley 3 3 Lomatium Nevadense Nevada Parsley 3 Var
    Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Cicuta douglasii poison parsnip 3 3 3 Cymopterus cinerarius alpine cymopterus 3 Cymopterus terebinthinus var. terebinth pteryxia 3 3 petraeus Ligusticum grayi Gray’s lovage 3 Lomatium dissectum fern-leaf 3 3 3 3 var. multifidum lomatium Lomatium foeniculaceum ssp. desert biscuitroot 3 fimbriatum Plant List Lomatium mohavense Mojave parsley 3 3 Lomatium nevadense Nevada parsley 3 var. nevadense Lomatium rigidum prickly parsley 3 Taxonomy and nomenclature in this species list are based on Lomatium torreyi Sierra biscuitroot 3 western sweet- the Jepson Manual Online as of February 2011. Changes in Osmorhiza occidentalis 3 3 ADOXACEAE–ASTERACEAE cicely taxonomy and nomenclature are ongoing. Some site lists are Perideridia bolanderi Bolander’s 3 3 more complete than others; all of them should be considered a ssp. bolanderi yampah Lemmon’s work in progress. Species not native to California are designated Perideridia lemmonii 3 yampah with an asterisk (*). Please visit the Inyo National Forest and Perideridia parishii ssp. Parish’s yampah 3 3 Bureau of Land Management Bishop Resource Area websites latifolia for periodic updates. Podistera nevadensis Sierra podistera 3 Sphenosciadium ranger’s buttons 3 3 3 3 3 capitellatum APOCYNACEAE Dogbane Apocynum spreading 3 3 androsaemifolium dogbane Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Apocynum cannabinum hemp 3 3 ADOXACEAE Muskroot Humboldt Asclepias cryptoceras 3 Sambucus nigra ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedingscalif09cali
    ' BINDING LIST DEC 1 5 )9l1 Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2009 with funding from Ontario Council of University Libraries http://www.archive.org/details/proceedingscalif09cali PROCEEDINGS California Academy of Sciences FOURTH SERIES Vol. IX 1919 o^n y ,% " PRINTED FROM THE ^• r JOHN W. HENDRIE PUBLICATION ENDOWMENT SAN FRANCISCO Published by the Academy 1919 r m COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION George C. Edwards, Chairman C. E. Grunsky Barton Warren Evermann, Editor if CONTENTS OF VOLUME IX Plates 1-20 page Title-page ] Contents '" Notes on West American Chitons— II 1 By S. Stillman Berry (Published June 16, 1919) Life-Zone Indicators in California 37 By Harvey Monroe Hall and Joseph Grinnell (Published June 16, 1919) Notes on Mammals collected principally in Washington and California between the Years 1853 and 1874 by Dr. James Graham Cooper. ... 69 By Walter P. Taylor (Published July 12, 1919) Climatic Relations of the Tertiary and Quaternary Faunas of the California Region 123 By James Perrin Smith (Published July 12, 1919) Contribution to the Optics of the Microscope 175 By C. W. Woodworth (Published July 12, 1919) The Gopher-Snakes of Western North America 197 By John Van Denburgh and Joseph R. Slevin (Published August 26, 1919) New Oregon Diptera 221 By F. R. Cole and A. L. Lovett (Published August 26, 1919) Key to the North American Species of the Dipterous Genus Medeterus, with Descriptions of New Species 257 By Millard C. Van Duzee (Published August 26, 1919.1 Description of a New Fossil Fish from Japan 271 By David Starr Jordan (Published October 22, 1919) Notes on the Avifauna of the Inner Coast Range of California 273 By Joseph Mailliard (Published November 25, 1919) New Species of Flies (Diptera) from California 297 By J.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report By Dr. Terri Hildebrand Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT and Dr. Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting, Kanab, UT Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement # H1200-09-0005 1 May 2012 Prepared for Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Southern Utah University National Park Service Mojave Network TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Introduction . 4 Study Area . 6 History and Setting . 6 Geology and Associated Ecoregions . 6 Soils and Climate . 7 Vegetation . 10 Previous Botanical Studies . 11 Methods . 17 Results . 21 Discussion . 28 Conclusions . 32 Acknowledgments . 33 Literature Cited . 34 Figures Figure 1. Location of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 5 Figure 2. Ecoregions and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 8 Figure 3. Soil types and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 9 Figure 4. Increase in the number of plant taxa confirmed as present in Grand Canyon- Parashant National Monument by decade, 1900-2011 . 13 Figure 5. Southern Utah University students enrolled in the 2010 Plant Anatomy and Diversity course that collected during the 30 August 2010 experiential learning event . 18 Figure 6. 2010-2011 collection sites and transportation routes in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 22 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Tables Table 1. Chronology of plant-collecting efforts at Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument . 14 Table 2. Data fields in the annotated checklist of the flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Appendices A, B, C, and D) .
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of PLANTS NAVAJO-KAIPAROWITS REGION By
    CHECKLIST OF PLANTS NAVAJO-KAIPAROWITS REGION Eastern Kane County Utah and Northern Coconino County Ariz! la by N. D. Atwood and S. L. Welsl The Center for Health and Environmental Stud: ~s of Brigham Young University is conducting an environmental impact s1 Idy in the Kaiparowits Basin of Kane County, Utah. This project is fundec by the participants constructing the Navajo and proposed Kaiparowits Pc ~r Generating Stations. The purpose of the study is to test the hypothesis :hat a coal burning generating plant will not have a significant impac1 on the plant communi- ties and associated fauna. Structure and dynamics of the biotic communi 1 . ~s, climate regimes, productivity of key species, pathology of deer and i& ~k-rabbits, and the trace element content of plants, soils, and air art : eing investigated within pinyon-juniper, desert grassland, sagebrush illackbrush, vanclevea, and desert shrub cOTImunities. The studies were designed to obtain three ye o ~s of data before and three years after each power plant goes into opera' .on. The studies, therefore, began during the summer of 1971 and hav, continued year-round to the present. Navajo Plant will be fully operat )nal during this coming summer. Baseline studies have been initiated with ~espect to the Kaiparowits Plant, with particular emphasis given to obtain ba, tground data on the trace elements and the pathological condition of deer an' jack-rabbits. During this next year, emphasis will also be given to rev, ~etation and rehabilitation of disturbed sites within the desert shrub communi ~ es of the Kaiparowits Basin. BYU's effort represents only approximately h .
    [Show full text]
  • 1985 Published by the Oregon Natural Heritage Data Base in Cooperation and Consultation With
    RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED PLANTS AND ANIMALS OF OREGON OREGON NATURAL HERITAGE DATA BASE MARCH, 1985 Published by the Oregon Natural Heritage Data Base in cooperation and consultation with: The Nature Conservancy The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife The Oregon Natural Heritage Advisory Council The United States Fish and Wildlife Service Zoologists and Botanists throughout Oregon Cover Illustration: Lampropeltis zonata (California mountain kingsnake). Drawn by Alan D. St. John CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES 2 OUTLINE AND DEFINITIONS 3 SPECIAL ANIMALS 4 List 1 5 List 2 6 Lists 8 Review List 10 SPECIAL PLANTS 11 Listl 12 List 2 15 Lists 20 Review-List 22 Watch List 2S Drop List 24 ANIMAL INDEX 25 PLANT INDEX 27 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION / / Extinction is a natural process. Today, however, plant and animal species are disappearing world-wide at an accelerated pace. Conservative estimates place the current rate of extinction at a thousand times the natural rate. The major cause of this phenomenon is large-scale alteration to native habitats. Ever since the impacts of European settlement began in the mid 1800's, this loss of ecosystem diversity has been a problem in Oregon as well. Once lost, a species can never be recovered, and there is no way of knowing how useful it may have been. We do know that human beings and many of their industries are still dependent on plants and animals that have developed in conjuction with natural ecosystems, and that each species contains its own specially evolved genes. About fifty percent of all pharmaceuticals have a natural component as an active ingredient, yet only two percent of the world's plants and animals have been chemically analyzed and tested.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Vascular Plants at Mojave National Preserve & Manzanar Historic Site
    Inventory of Vascular Plants at Mojave National Preserve & Manzanar Historic Site For U.S. National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program Camissonia boothii ssp. boothii Prepared by James M. André University of California Riverside, Granite Mountains Desert Research Center November 15, 2006 Contract Number: P2128020178 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 National Inventory and Monitoring Program and Mojave Network 1 1.2 Program Overview 1 1.3 Regional Context and Significance 2 1.3.1 Mojave National Preserve 2 1.3.2 Manzanar Historic Site 4 1.4 Objectives 5 2.0 METHODS 2.1 Herbarium Surveys 7 2.1.1 Database and Bibliographic Query 7 2.2 Field Surveys 7 2.2.1 Mojave National Preserve 7 2.2.2 Manzanar Historic Site 8 2.3 Voucher Specimens 8 2.4 Survey Timing 9 2.5 Field Investigators 9 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Level of Effort 10 3.2 Summary of Findings - Manzanar Historic Site 10 3.3 Summary of Findings - Mojave National Preserve 14 3.3.1 Field Surveys 14 3.3.2 New Vascular Plant Taxa for MOJA 14 3.3.3 Special-Status Plants 33 3.3.4 Non-Native Alien Plants 40 4.0 DISCUSSION 4.1 Summary 41 4.2 Recommendations 41 Acknowledgements 43 5.0 REFERENCES 44 i List of Maps, Tables and Appendices Map 1. Distribution of all Area Searches in Priority Locations, Targeted Surveys, and Opportunistic Surveys conducted in the Mojave National Preserve, 2002 – 2005. 15 Table 1. Checklist of vascular plant taxa known to occur in the Manzanar Historic Site.
    [Show full text]
  • 1987 Division of State Lands
    RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED PLANTS AND ANIMALS OF OREGON OREGON NATURAL HERITAGE DATA BASE APRIL, 1987 Division of State Lands NEIL GOLDSCHMIDT GOVERNOR 1600 STATE STREET, SALEM, OREGON 97310 PHONE (503) 378-3805 OREGON STATE March 31, 1987 LAND BOARD NEIL GOLDSCHMIDT Governor BARBARA ROBERTS The Nature Conservancy Secretary of State 1234 N.W. 25th Avenue BILL RUTHERFORD Portland, Oregon 97210 State Treasurer The State Land Board appreciates the effort put forth by The Nature Conservancy for the Oregon Natural Heritage Advisory Council and all those involved in assembling and producing the Oregon Natural Heritage Data Base. This publication will provide an invaluable service to the public in identifying the status of rare, threatened and endangered plants and animals, and for use in facilitating research and monitoring efforts. Thank you for your hard work and professional analysis. Neil Golds^midt Governor CONTENTS INTRODUCnON 1 MAPS 3 SPECIAL ANIMALS 4 Legal Status List 5 Listl 7 List2 8 Lists 10 ReviewAVatdi List 12 Drop List 13 SPECIAL PLANTS 14 Legal Status List 15 Listl 17 List 2 20 List 3 25 Review List 27 Watch List 28 Drop List 29 ANIMAL INDEX 30 PLANT INDEX 34 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Published by the Oregon Natural Heritage Data Base in cooperation and consultation with: The Nature Conservancy The Oregon Department of Fish and VNMdlife The Oregon Natural Heritage Advisory Council The United States Fish and W^dlife Service Zoologists and Botanists throughout Oregon Cover Illustration: Mirabilis macfarlanei (Macfarlane's four-o'clock) by Julie Kierstead. INTRODUCTION Extinction is a natural process. Today, however, plant and animal requests should be directed to: species are disappearing world-wide at an accelerated pace.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Institute for Natural Resources Publications Institute for Natural Resources - Portland 10-2010 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon James S. Kagan Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Sue Vrilakas Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, [email protected] Eleanor P. Gaines Portland State University Cliff Alton Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Lindsey Koepke Oregon Biodiversity Information Center See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2010. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 105 pp. This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for Natural Resources Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors James S. Kagan, Sue Vrilakas, Eleanor P. Gaines, Cliff Alton, Lindsey Koepke, John A. Christy, and Erin Doyle This book is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub/24 RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF OREGON OREGON BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION CENTER October 2010 Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources Portland State University PO Box 751, Mail Stop: INR Portland, OR 97207-0751 (503) 725-9950 http://orbic.pdx.edu With assistance from: Native Plant Society of Oregon The Nature Conservancy Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of State Lands Oregon Natural Heritage Advisory Council U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare, Threatened and Endangered Vascular Plant Species of Oregon
    Rare, Threatened and Endangered Vascular Plant Species of Oregon An excerpt of the Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species of Oregon publication April 2019 Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Portland State University Portland, Oregon Scientific Name Ecoregion; Adjacent States Heritage Federal ODA ORBIC Common Name Oregon Counties Rank Status Status List Vascular Plants Abronia latifolia Eschsch. CR; CA, WA G5 -- -- 4 Yellow sandverbena Clat, Coos, Curr, Doug, Lane, Linc, Till S3 Abronia mellifera Dougl. ex Hook. BR, CB, EC; ID, WA + G4 -- -- 3 White sandverbena Gill, Harn, Hood, Malh, Morr, Sher, Umat, Wasc SNR Abronia turbinata Torr. ex S. Wats. BR; CA, ID, NV, AZ G5 -- -- 2 Trans montane abronia Harn, Malh S1 Abronia umbellata Lam. var. breviflora (Standl.) CR; CA, WA, BC G4G5T2 SOC LE 1 L.A. Galloway Clat, Coos, Curr, Doug, Lane, Linc, Till S1 Pink sandverbena Achnatherum hendersonii (Vasey) Barkworth BM, CB; WA G3 -- C 1 Henderson ricegrass Croo, Gran, Sher, Wasc S2 Achnatherum nevadense (B.L. Johnson) BM, BR; CA, ID, NV + G4 -- -- 2 Barkworth Bake, Harn, Malh S2 Nevada needlegrass Achnatherum pinetorum (M.E. Jones) Barkworth BR; CA, ID, NV + G4 -- -- 4 Pine needlegrass Harn S3 Achnatherum richardsonii (Link) Barkworth BM; WA + G5 -- -- 2 Richardson's needlegrass Umat, Unio S2? Achnatherum wallowaense J.R. Maze & K.A. BM G2G3 -- -- 1 Robson Croo, Wall S2S3 Wallowa ricegrass Achnatherum webberi (Thurb.) Barkworth BR; CA, ID, NV + G4 -- -- 4 Webber needlegrass Harn, Lake, Malh S3 Adiantum jordanii C. Muell. CR, KM; CA G4G5 -- -- 2 California maiden-hair Coos, Curr, Doug, Jack, Jose S2 Adiantum shastense Huiet & A.R. Sm.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanizing Along the East Side of Steens Mountain: Some Lessons Learned on a Field Trip to Southeastern Oregon
    Botanizing Along the East Side of Steens Mountain: Some Lessons Learned on a Field Trip to Southeastern Oregon Kareen B. Sturgeon Professor Emerita, Biology Department Linfield College, McMinnville, Oregon Steens Mountain and the western edge of the Alvord Desert from East Steens Road. The desert is a remnant of Alvord Lake that extended for 100 miles to the north and south during the Pleistocene. Photo by author. t’s why those of us who write about landscape are so interested in experience provides an unparalleled opportunity for scientific study science, too. It’s not in order to categorize the wildflowers, to make and for reflection on the value of native species and landscapes. lists of things, but to make our vision...go deeper and deeper. The The students are required to make a plant collection and, in early Imore I learn, the more I see. And the more I see, the more I learn.” May, the floral diversity along the east side of the escarpment is –Gretel Ehrlich, quoted in Trimble (1988) much greater than what we could see in the northern Willamette The vans are not yet one block from Murdock Hall when bags Valley at that time of year. of chips and cookies are ripped open, a sure sign that the field trip has officially begun. On the Road For most of the 27 years I taught at Linfield College, I made a five-day road trip to southeastern Oregon with students in Our itinerary takes us across five ecoregions, each one characterized my biology majors class, Systematics of Flowering Plants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation and Flora of Edwards Air Force Base, Western Mojave Desert, California
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 35 | Issue 2 Article 2 2017 The egetV ation and Flora of Edwards Air Force Base, Western Mojave Desert, California David Charlton Jacobs Engineering, Pasadena Philip W. Rundel University of California, Los Angeles Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Charlton, David and Rundel, Philip W. (2017) "The eV getation and Flora of Edwards Air Force Base, Western Mojave Desert, California," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 35: Iss. 2, Article 2. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol35/iss2/2 Aliso, 35(2), pp. 51–68 ISSN: 0065-6265 (print), 2327-2929 (online) THE VEGETATION AND FLORA OF EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, WESTERN MOJAVE DESERT, CALIFORNIA DAV I D CHARLTON1 AND PHILIP W. RUNDEL2,3 1Jacobs Engineering, Pasadena, California 91101 ([email protected]); 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095 3Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Edwards Air Force Base extends over 121,000 ha in the Antelope Valley of the western Mojave Desert, with much of the area part of a closed endorheic basin that held the Pleistocene Lake Thompson. Notable topographic features are Rogers, Rosamond and Buckhorn dry lakes, while rounded domes and scattered hills are present to the north and east. Elevation gradients are limited, ranging from a low of 690 m to 1044 m near the eastern margin. Diverse communities of saltbush scrub dominate the lower plains, while creosote bush scrub and Joshua tree woodlands are present away from the old lake basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Havasu Field Office • Proposed RMP and Final EIS • September
    Lake Havasu Field Office • Proposed RMP and Final EIS • September 2006 Volume III – Glossary, Appendices Abstract The Lake Havasu Field Office Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement (PRMP/FEIS) describes and analyzes five alternatives for managing approximately 1.3 million acres of public land in Northwestern Arizona and Eastern California along the Colorado River and east to Alamo Lake and the Harcuvar Mountains. Information provided by the public, other agencies and organizations, and BLM personnel has been used to develop and analyze the alternatives is this PRMP/FEIS. Alternative 1 is the No Action Alternative and represents continuation of current management. Alternative 2 emphasizes preservation of undeveloped primitive landscapes and opportunities for non-motorized recreation. Alternative 3 emphasizes recreation and resource development. Alternative 4 makes land available for recreation and resource development with greater opportunities to experience natural settings than in Alternative 2. Alternative 5, the agency Proposed Plan, provides for a balance between authorized resource use and the protection and long- term sustainability of sensitive resources. Major issues addressed in the PRMP/FEIS are identification of lands that would be made available for disposal, management of recreation and public access, designation and management of Special Designations, management of wilderness characteristics, management of wild burros around Alamo Lake, and BLM’s role in the management of Lake Havasu. Front Cover Photo: Lake Havasu 2006 BLM Photo by Diane Williams BLM/AZ/PL-06/008 Contents Volume III Glossary References Index Acronyms and Abbreviations Appendices Appendix A. Summary of Scoping Appendix B. Applicable Laws, Regulations, Policy, and Planning Criteria Appendix C.
    [Show full text]