AUTHOR- Baber, Eric TITLE Fine Arts Educational Improvement Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
WM. DOCUMENT RESUME ED 080 435 SO 006 122 AUTHOR- Baber, Eric TITLE Fine Arts Educational Improvement Project.. Evaluation Record 1969-1910.. INSTITUTION Illinois Midstate Educational Center, Normal.. SPONS AGENCY Bureau of'Elementary and Secondary Education (DREW /OE), Washington; D.C.. PUB DATE 70 NOTE 296p.. EDRS PRICE MF -$0.65 HC-$9.87 DESCRIPTORS Art Appreciation; Cultural Activities; Curriculum Development; Curriculum Enrichment; Drama; Educational Improvement; *Educational Innovatidh; *Educational Programs; Elementary Grades; *Fine Arts; Inservice Teacher Education; Intermediate Grades; Music; Music Education; Pilot Projects; *Program Evaluation; Records (Forms); Resource Centers; Secondary Grades; Summative Evaluation; *Theater ArtsY IDENTIFIERS Elenantary Secondary Education Act Title III; ESEA Title III; *Fine Arts Educational Improvement Project; PACE ABSTRACT This document is an evaluation and record of the Fine Arts Educational Improvement Project, aTitle III, E.S.E.A..NPACEi project administeredrin the state of Iilinois..The project functigned primarily in the subject fields of art, drama, and music..Within the general purpose of improving educational opportunities in the arts, -the project recognized these major objectives: 1) To provide live performances so that every child may have first-hand experiences with quality concerts, plays, and art exhibits or demonstrations; 2) To provide a variety of inservice training experiences for teachers to increase teaching effectiveness in the fine arts; 3) To provide models in the form of pilot programs to demonstrate unique approaches to fine arts education; and 4) To provide information materials, and services to project area schools through establishment and operation of a central Fine Arts Center. Measurement of evaluation results indicates that a significant number of the objectives of the project °were attained. Samples -of project' materials are included in the report: evaluation forms, publicity forms, pre-performance notes, conference reports, curriculum guides, in art and music..A related document. is ED 037 473..(Authelr/SBM) EVALUATION AND RECORD OP TRE INE ARTS EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENril!PERTynni 1969 - 1970 mee p1,0",,e,a (Project to AdvanceCreativityinEducation) A Title III, (Elementaryand Secondary Educat- ion Act) operational projectconducted by the Illinois Midstate Educational Center for thebenefit of child- ren, teachers, andother interested citizens in the counties of DeWitt, Livingston, Logan, McLean,and Woodford. ( -J-_1_11 t II 111411811111y6IN I II fl 1 If U.S. DEPARTMENT OP HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO DUCE 0 EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN ATING IT, POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED 00 NOT NECESSARILY REPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION POSITION QR POLICY ifk EVALUATION RECORD 1969-1970 Al} FIrE ARTS EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DR. ERIC BASER EVALUATION CHAIRMAN RICHARD HACKL, Research DR. CALVIN PRITNER, Drama Assistant Consultant RALPH WOOLARD, Project MARY PACKWOOD, Art Consultantr Director EDWARD SPRY, Music Director .. ILLINOIS MIDSTATE EDUCATIONAL CENTER 905 N. MAIN NORMAL, ILL. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS (1969-1970) Page No. ,W5,= Project Description and Overall Evaluation . .' 2 - 2 A. Nature and Purposes of the Project . B. Evaluation Procc:lures and-Genoraiizaviort of Data .. 7 C. Strengths, Limitations, and New Areas of Emphasis . 9 I. Evaluation of Art Activities ......... 0 . 13 A. Chronology and Attendance Figures 13 B. Art Workshops 1. Tri-County . - . 15 . p . , 18 C. Saturday*Art Centers 4 0 20 1. Odell . 20 2. Minonk-Dana-Rutland 20 IC 3. Farmer City 22 z 4. Mt. Pulaski . :. 4 . ....... 24 Materials Resource Center -'25 vr-7-4 D, - 1. Traveling Art Shows and Exhibits 25 2, Picture Loan Service . o ... .... 26 26 3. Instructional Materiels Kits . 27 E. Pilot-Program in Art Education , F. Artist Demonstrations and-- Presentations 28 1. Ceramics -- 28 2. Weaving 29 3. silk Screen 4 30 4.- Painting 31 5. Special Lectures 32 0. Summary Statements*by: 1, Project Art Consultant, Mary Packwood 33 2. ro3ect Art Consultant, Barry Moore 35 3. Art Instructor, Pontiac, Joan Lyons 37 4. Art Instrudtor, Cooperating Districts, Mary stoney38 III. EvalUation of DramaActiiiiiies 39 A. Chronology and Attendance Figures 39 B, Drama Workiho0 41 1. Lincoln' . 4 41 - 2. Pontiac a 44 Materials ResoUrceCentir 45 D. Summer Theatre 46 E. Live Performances . *******e _ * 47 47 1. Oedipus Rex JD. ** 2. Reynard the'Fox 53 3. I Am Waiting 56 4. Midsummer Night's Dream 58 F. Summary Statement by Project Drama Consultant 59 IV. Evaluation -of _MUsic Activities 65 A. Chronology and Attendance Figures 65 B. Workshops, Clinics, Conferences 67 1. Conference for Music Educators 67 2. Music Workshop ORFF 72 3. Music Workshop Guitar 76 4.'Music Workshop Trumpet- Cornet 78 5. Jazz Worksh6p and Clinic 82 6. Statement from Music Consultant, Paul Rosene 85 C. Pilot Efforts and MiscellaneousActivities 87 1. Chestnut Grade School Pilot Program 87 2. Special Band Clinics 88 3, Suzuki Festival 89 89 D. Materials Resource Center . 90 E. Live Performances 90 1. Perry Hackett, Pianist 2. Sigma Alpha Iota Alumni Chorus 4 93 3/ Dave Holcomb Jazz Trio 95 4. ISU Faculty Woodwind Quthtet 97 5. Peoria Symphony Quartet -99 6. IWU Percussion Ensemble 101 7. ISU Percussion Ensemble 103 8. IWU Woodwind Quintet 105 107 9. ISU Festival Brass Quintet 110 10. ISU Fine Amts Brass Quintet V. Evaluation Statement by the ProjectDirector 112 112 A. Summary of Evaluation Results . B. Contributions of Project.Staff, Consultants and Others Involved 114 Vl. Samples of Project Materials A. Evaluation Forma B. Publicity Material C. Pre-Performance Study Notes D. Other Materials 4 EVALUATION REPORT 1969-70 1. Project Description and Overall Evaluation A. Nature and Purposes of the Project This Fine-Arts Educational Improvement Projectis a Title III, ESEA "PACE" project administered throughthe Illinois Midstate Educational Center with offices at905 North Main Street, Normal, Illinois. The project area consists of the live counties of DeWitt,_Livingston, Logan, McLean and Woodford in yhich are located 200.schools in 70 school systems employing approximately3,000 teachers and enrolling some 54,000 pupils. The generalpopiiiation 1 of the project area is about 225,000. A combination of farms and small towns characterizes the area. There is one medium size urban area(Bloomington-Normal) and four smaller county seat cities (Lincoln,Pontiac, Eureka and Clinton). The project is completing its third and final year of operation. It fundtions primarily in the subject fields oeart, drama and music. It has shown consistent growth each year with respect to the numbersof pupils and teachers served, as well as in thequality of its services and its total impact on the area. Last year we felt the project really cameinto its own, and this year we feel justified inrepeating and underlining the following quotation from the1968-69 Project Evaluation Document: 2. 4 "This project embodies a sensitivity toloOal needs and an urgence toward relevance which enables it to penetrate the walls of isolation traditionally existing in this geographic area between fine arts programs and the schools and communities. Children and teachers are priviledged to talk with artists and watch them work.They participate in creative expression through the visual and performing arts. They examine and experience the arts of various cultures and are guided to relate these to' their daily_lives_ and the world around them. Their other studies are enriched and made more meaningfulthrough expanding perceptions of the arts in modernsociety." Within the broad, general pur7oses of (a) helping elementary acid secondary pupils in the project area to better understand, appreciate and take part in the fine arts, (b) helping teachers and administrators to improve the quality and-extend the scope of their fine arts offering, and (c) increasing the publicawareness of educational needs and-opportunities for better living through challenging and rewarding experiencesin the arts, the project has recognized these majorobjectives: (1) To provide enough live performances in enough places so that every child will have opportunities for first-hand experiences with quality concerts, plays, and art exhibits or demonstrations. 3 (2) To provide a wide variety of inservice training experiences for teachers to increase their teaching effectiveness in the fine arts. (3) To proyide several model or exemplary offerings in the form of pilot programs, to demonstrate some unique and promising approaches to fine arts education. (4) To provide needed information, materials and services to the project area schools through the establishment and operation of a ntra Fine Arts Service Center, with an able sta and adequate resources. These overall objectives have served to give the project a sense of direction and balance, and they have been supplemented in terms of specific operational objec- tives in order to inbure project responsiveness to changing needs and to provide a substantial, comprehensive base for evaluation. For purposes of illustration, we cite here the more specific objectives in one of the project's three main subject fields- - ART: g_ 1. "Live Performances" (a) To provide as many schools as possible with demonstrations (ceramics, weaving, drawing, etc.) by traveling artists, so that children, teachers, and parents might become more aware of the values and usefulness of such