DOCSLIB.ORG

Delivering Optimal Cancer Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delivering Optimal Cancer Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic By Delivering Optimal Cancer Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic By Linda Summerton and Dominic Bowers 9 April 2020 Introduction The UK, along with the rest of the world, is living in unprecedented times in all areas of personal and business life due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which is putting new and very significant pressures on individuals, families and organisations. These pressures are already being felt most acutely within the NHS itself, as it not only grapples to deal with the rising tide of new COVID-19 cases within a system that is already at capacity, but also to maintain established health care provision in other areas. Professor Martin Marshall, Chairman of the Royal College of General Practitioners and Britain’s most senior family doctor warns ‘patients are still living with long-term conditions and still have non COVID-related health needs and illnesses, that, if left unmanaged or untreated, could have serious consequences.’ (The Times, 29th March 2020). In this article we will outline the NHS strategy to deliver optimal cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic, review the statistics on delivery of cancer care services in the NHS and how they may be negatively affected, and highlight the learning from other countries in maintaining cancer care during these challenging times. NHS strategy to deliver optimal cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic The NHS has strict guidelines to deliver cancer care, according to diagnosis and urgency, but these are now under considerable strain with redeployment of clinicians to prepare to treat patients with COVID-19, and consequent cancellations of surgery, therapeutic treatment and outpatient clinics. Additionally, the impact of social distancing to prevent the spread of the virus has seen the cancellation of regular cancer screening and closure of GP surgeries, which are so important in identifying the first signs and symptoms of cancer. It is encouraging to see a positive and pragmatic response to the crisis from NHS England and NICE, outlining how to deliver cancer care in these unprecedented times [1]. In March 2020, NHS England published specialty guides for patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic for all specialties [2]. Specifically, for cancer care, the guidance recognises that the elective component of delivery may be curtailed, but that it is important to continue proper management of cancer patients while protecting resources to respond to COVID-19. The guidance considers all types of therapy, including surgery, systemic anti-cancer therapies, radiotherapy, and proton beam therapy. The guidance assigns patients to ‘priority levels’ according to the likely impact of the therapy on patient outcomes, and particularly survival. The guidance also identifies cancer patients most vulnerable to contracting COVID-19, including those who are severely immunocompromised through the nature of their disease or treatment. Professor Karol Sikora (Oncology) has commented that ‘they [the guidelines] are really quite sensible. I'm surprised to say that actually, I couldn't do better myself, and I think most of my colleagues feel the same.’ However, he also comments, ‘In terms of other issues with cancer, there's a lot of borderline here and that's going to be the problem ─ explaining to people why we're delaying or cancelling treatment is not easy. Dropping them an email is really not good enough.’ (Medscape, March 2020). Another challenge is that while the guidance is national, decisions are taken locally with regional variations a natural consequence. For example, on 23 March 2020 and under the pressure of mounting cases of COVID-19, a London hospital announced that it had postponed outpatient chemotherapy appointments and cancer surgery for 2 weeks to protect people with 2 cancer who may be at high risk of developing severe illness from coronavirus; urgent operations will go ahead [3]. Additionally, BBC London News has made similar reports in recent broadcasts, with Professor Karol Sikora stating, ‘Delay is dangerous’ [4]. While this might be the only decision at the time given the local NHS pressures, it is not the best decision for these cancer patients if there were other ways of mobilising resources and protecting them from infection. Can the guidance from NHS England be followed in practice? The guidance recognises that cancer care may well be compromised due to several factors, including the risk of COVID-19 infection and staff sickness, redeployment, and shortages in medicine, and that difficult decisions are already being made. The challenge to deliver optimal cancer care is also being experienced by a system already under strain as identified by Carl Baker in the latest report from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on cancer care delivery (February 2020): • Cancer waiting times are the worst on record. On all 8 measures that were recorded, annual performance in 2019 was lower than during previous years. • The waiting time target is that 93% of patients should have their first consultant appointment within 2 weeks of referral. This target was almost always met until 2018. Since then performance has fallen, and as of December 2019, the target has not been met for 10 months. August 2019 saw record low performance on this measure at 89.4% [5]. Additionally, new diagnoses of cancer through screening and GP visits will not be made during the pandemic. While this will decrease referrals to cancer specialists and alleviate resource shortages, the negative impact on the outcomes for these patients, and particularly survival prospects, is likely to be profound. Carl Baker notes that: • The number of urgent GP referrals for suspected cancer has risen substantially in recent years. In 2019, there were 2.38 million referrals ─ an average of 6135 per day. • In 2019, 163,614 patients were treated for cancer after urgent referral by their GP. Hence, both a negative impact on delivery of routine cancer care and delays to identifying new cases of cancer, will lead to a sharp rise in mortality and morbidity over the coming 12−18 months. What can we learn from other countries' experience of cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic? The picture may seem bleak for cancer patients either waiting for diagnoses or receiving treatment as services are rationed, delayed and the risks of infectious complications weighs heavily on uptake of much needed innovative cancer treatments that will save lives. However, while there have been challenges in maintaining optimal treatment of cancer in countries which were first to suffer the COVID-19 outbreak [6], some positive stories have since emerged from both China and Italy that show, despite a rapidly spreading serious pandemic in both countries, their cancer services continued to deliver as expected. In Wuhan, the epicentre of the Chinese COVID-19 infection, delivery of radiotherapy was continued without interruption as infectious control measures were undertaken to halt transmission among cancer patients and staff [7]. The early result of a 0.48% infection rate in the hospital setting in Wuhan demonstrates the effectiveness of a robust and strictly performed infection control protocol within the radiotherapy unit. The Wuhan infection control protocol was comprehensive, covering a stepwise clinical pathway to manage suspected cases that included questionnaires, computed tomography (CT) scans, reverse transcriptase polymerase 3 chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays, on-site screening, a restructuring of the radiotherapy unit, and protection of healthcare workers in the facility. An article that reviewed a secondary care cancer centre near Turin in Italy showed that, operationally, it is possible to continue delivering cancer care to vulnerable cancer patients whilst still ensuring appropriate tight infection control measures [8]. Guidance from the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) states, ‘Essential cancer services should be delivered but all steps should be taken to protect patients from infection with COVID-19. Individual risk from exposure to COVID-19 varies from patient to patient, and all risks should be balanced against the need for tumor control and discussed on a case-by-case basis with the patient' [9]. While ESMO also notes that, ‘In some oncology departments, cancer services have been prioritised according to urgency, giving high priority to patients receiving treatment for active disease while postponing follow- up visits,’ there is a clear statement that, ‘In the majority of patients, the benefit of following a well-planned and well-controlled anti-cancer treatment plan will outweigh the risk of a coronavirus infection.’ The negative impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials for cancer patients The COVID-19 impact is also being seen within cancer clinical trials as biopharma consider cancellation of further recruitment into ongoing trials and starting new clinical trials. EMA and FDA guidance advise that patients can continue treatment depending on the trial and indication, but continuation will be subject to what is practically possible depending on healthcare resources. NHS guidance has been published regarding amendment to existing studies impacted by the wider COVID-19 response, and the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR UK) announced in March 2020 that it will be suspending all non- COVID-19 funded studies [10]. A Bioindustry Association (BIA) UK webinar on running a life science business during the COVID-19 pandemic recognised that many laboratory research studies will be delayed and that further recruitment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shiatsu and Cancer
    SHIATSU AND CANCER As with many other complementary therapies a major benefit for people affected by cancer is having time to talk, be listened to and heard in a safe environment. The shiatsu practitioner is trained to relate to people as individuals and assess their physical, mental, emotional and spiritual needs – essential in recovery from cancer. The power of touch used in shiatsu should never be underestimated. Shiatsu can offer valuable support from the point of diagnosis, immediately after surgery and throughout radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Once treatment is finished, shiatsu sessions can aid recovery, help to renew energy and motivate people to take responsibility for their wellbeing. Shiatsu offers a drug free solution to reduce side effects such as pain, nausea and lethargy associated with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy and may help to reduce hot flushes in hormone therapy. Shiatsu restores and balances energy levels and triggers the relaxation response easing stress and tension in the body and mind and encouraging restful sleep. Shiatsu facilitates emotional release without the need to ask searching questions, helping to reduce levels of fear and anxiety, dissipate anger and frustration and assist the grieving process. Shiatsu moves the lymph helping to minimise the risk of lymphoedema. Shiatsu assists with the detoxification process. Shiatsu helps to restore hormonal balance in hormone related cancers Shiatsu encourages correct posture, breathing, stretching and exercise Shiatsu may help to boost the immune response Shiatsu improves circulation and enhances wellbeing Shiatsu awakens the spirit and inspires hope for the future. Shiatsu helps people to get back in control, encourages self management and empowers people to take responsibility for their healing and well-being, thereby improving their quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurohealth Vol 13 No 3 MENTAL HEALTH ECONOMICS
    Eurohealth RESEARCH • DEBATE • POLICY • NEWS Volume 13 Number 3, 2007 Making the economic case for mental health in Europe France: Health promotion for migrants Intergovernmental relations in Italian health care Health inequalities in the decentralised Spanish health care system Migration of Flemish doctors to the Netherlands • Romania: Pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement Austria: Electronic health record development • Institutional and community care for older people in Turkey Eurohealth A timely opportunity for Europe LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political The European Commission has just published its new Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom C Health Strategy ‘Together for Health: A Strategic fax: +44 (0)20 7955 6090 Approach for the EU 2008–2013’. Building on current www.lse.ac.uk/LSEHealth work, this Strategy aims to provide, for the first time, Editorial Team an overarching strategic framework spanning core EDITOR: issues in health, as well as in ‘health in all policies’ David McDaid: +44 (0)20 7955 6381 and global health issues. email: [email protected] O FOUNDING EDITOR: Elias Mossialos: +44 (0)20 7955 7564 The explicit inclusion of the promotion of mental, as email: [email protected] well as physical, health is a timely reminder of the DEPUTY EDITORS: importance of looking at health holistically. Poor Sherry Merkur: +44 (0)20 7955 6194 mental health affects more than 130 million Europeans email: [email protected] Philipa Mladovsky: +44 (0)20 7955 7298 M at a cost to every European household of more than email: [email protected] € 2,000 per annum.
    [Show full text]
  • A Day to Remember
    THE Independent Autumn 2010 Adayto remember Installing our new Chancellor – Page 6 Interview: Karol Sikora Page 8 Dickens Dinner An invitation to celebrate 150 years of Great Expectations Page 5 www.buckingham.ac.uk Annual Fund Help us remain No 1 in the National Student Survey by donating to the following projects: • Multimedia Centre • Video Equipment • Bursaries & Prizes • Hardship Fund Thank you to everyone whose donations have enabled the Annual Fund to successfully contribute to the following projects: • Campus Radio Station • Memorial Garden • The Cellars, Verney Park • BSc in Business Enterprise Prize • University Minibus • Wellness Centre • SU Music Equipment To Donate Go To https://extranet.buckingham.ac.uk/alumnet/ubf-aaf.aspx ALUMNI Annual Fund 2 Autumn 2010 Contents 3 Welcome Welcome to the Comment 4 From the Vice-Chancellor autumn issue This year, 2010, has been a good University News 5 one for the university because Great Dinner Expected; for the fifth year running Most Satisfied Students; Buckingham hit the top spot for student satisfaction in the Afternoon Tea at the House National Student Survey. It is a of Lords; At Home with your spectacular achievement and VC; New Faces; Leavers our thanks go to students and staff for the support and effort involved in keeping us at Looking to the Future Number One. 7 Installation of the new The university is changing all the time and experienced a surge in student numbers in September, Chancellor doubling its intake compared with last year. Part of the reason, we think, is our position in the league tables - we entered the league table Feature – Escape from the in The Independent newspaper for the first time this year coming in at 8 Day Job 20th position, and we also appear this year in the teaching training league table, in fifth position.
    [Show full text]
  • Side Effects
    WARNING: SIDE EFFECTS A check-up on the federal health law United States Senate 112th Congress Senator Tom Coburn, M.D. Senator John Barrasso, M.D. March 2012 0 Contents Introduction………………….……………………………………………………………………………………..2 1. Millions of Americans Could Lose Their Health Insurance Plan……………………………...5 2. Hundreds of Billions of Dollars of Tax Hikes………………………………………………………….9 3. New Insurance Rule Increases Costs, Reduces Choices…………………………………………11 4. Data Confirms Law Is a Government-Takeover of Health Care……………………………...16 5. Findings from New Taxpayer-Funded Research Institute Could Be Used to Deny Payment for Patients’ Care………………………………………………20 6. New Medicare Bureaucracy Empowered………………….………………………………………...27 7. New Insurance Cooperatives to Waste Taxpayers’ Dollars……………………….………….30 8. Device Tax Stifles Innovation…………………………………………………………………………..…34 1 Introduction Two years ago, supporters of the President’s health care law said Congress needed to pass the health bill so the American people could find out what was in it.1 After the President signed the bill into law, supporters guaranteed that “as people learn about the bill….it’s going to become more and more popular.”2 Over the past twenty four months, American families have learned more about the President’s health care law and do not like what they see. Higher insurance premiums. A coming state budget-busting Medicaid expansion. Fewer choices. Less freedom and more government interference. Cuts to Medicare by unelected government bureaucrats. Thousands of pages of regulations. An unconstitutional mandate to buy health insurance. Penalties on employers threatening job creation. Billions of dollars in tax hikes and, once fully implemented, $2.6 trillion in new health care spending. It’s no wonder that a majority of Americans oppose the law today.3 In fact, poll after poll shows that a majority of Americans want the Supreme Court to overturn the law.4 As practicing physicians, we believed – long before Congress passed the health spending law – that the health care law did not represent real health care reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Karol Sikora
    THE MAGAZINE FOR DULWICH COLLEGE ALUMNI FEATURING PROFESSOR KAROL SIKORA With reflections on the pandemic and its impact on cancer PLUS KYLE KARIM AT LEGO AND THE ORIGINS OF SOCCER AT DC WELCOME TO THE MAGAZINE FOR DULWICH COLLEGE ALUMNI PAGE 03 Meet the Team Trevor Llewelyn Matt Jarrett (72-79) Hon Secretary of Director of Development the Alleyn Club As I write this editorial the College is currently In the last edition of OA I hoped that our new format closed to all but the children of key workers. It is would allow us to look in greater depth at the only the third time in the school’s long history that lives and careers of OAs. That we have been able this has happened and two of those have been in to do with interviews with sailor Mark Richmond, response to Covid 19. The only other time our gates opera singer Rodney Clarke and Kyle Karim who Joanne Whaley have been shut was during the Second World War as Director of Marketing for Lego may, by his own Kathi Palitz when we temporarily moved out of the capital in admission, just have the best job in the world. Alumni & Parent Database and Operations order to share the facilities of Tonbridge School. It Relations Manager was not a success and the boys soon returned to Like much of the country very little competitive sport Manager London and in so doing Dulwich became one of the took place during the summer and our reporting very few public schools not to be evacuated for the reflects this.
    [Show full text]
  • Warning: Side Effects
    WARNING: SIDE EFFECTS A check-up on the federal health law United States Senate 112th Congress Senator Tom Coburn, M.D. Senator John Barrasso, M.D. March 2012 0 Contents Introduction………………….……………………………………………………………………………………..2 1. Millions of Americans Could Lose Their Health Insurance Plan……………………………...5 2. Hundreds of Billions of Dollars in Tax Hikes………………………………………………………….9 3. New Insurance Rule Increases Costs, Reduces Choices…………………………………………11 4. Data Confirms Law Is a Government-Takeover of Health Care……………………………...16 5. Findings from New Taxpayer-Funded Research Institute Could Be Used to Deny Payment for Patients’ Care………………………………………………20 6. New Medicare Bureaucracy Empowered………………….………………………………………...27 7. New CO-Ops Expected to Waste Taxpayers’ Dollars…………………………………………….30 8. Device Tax Stifles Innovation…………………………………………………………………………..…34 1 Introduction Two years ago, supporters of the President’s health care law said Congress needed to pass the health bill so the American people could find out what was in it.1 After the President signed the bill into law, supporters guaranteed that “as people learn about the bill….it’s going to become more and more popular.”2 Over the past twenty four months, American families have learned more about the President’s health care law and do not like what they see. Higher insurance premiums. A coming state budget-busting Medicaid expansion. Fewer choices. Less freedom and more government interference. Cuts to Medicare by unelected government bureaucrats. Thousands of pages of regulations. An unconstitutional mandate to buy health insurance. Penalties on employers threatening job creation. Billions of dollars in tax hikes and, once fully implemented, $2.6 trillion in new health care spending.
    [Show full text]
  • RAGE Reportv15.Qxp
    Yesterday’s women The story of R.A.G.E. Researched and written by Bec Hanley and Kristina Staley, TwoCan Associates Yesterday’s Women: the story of R.A.G.E. Yesterday’s Women: the story of R.A.G.E. This story is dedicated to all those who have supported Yesterday’s Women is a report commissioned by Macmillan Cancer the R.A.G.E. campaign over the past 15 years. We’d like Support and researched and written by TwoCan Associates. It aims to tell the story of R.A.G.E. (Radiotherapy Action Group Exposure), drawing on to particularly mention Liz Gebhardt, Carole Hunter, interviews with R.A.G.E. members and other people who played a part in Valerie Eldridge and Lorna Patch, R.A.G.E. Committee their history, as well as a review of the documents kept by the people members who sadly have passed away and for whom who were interviewed. Yesterday’s Women has been written too late. Other parties are permitted to make use of this report independently of Macmillan Cancer Support. However Macmillan Cancer Support and TwoCan Associates do not endorse, support or take responsibility for any use of the report by any individual or organisation or any reliance on the material contained in it. If Macmillan Cancer Support uses the report for its own purposes, any such use will be clearly stated to be Macmillan Cancer Support endorsed activity. © Macmillan Cancer Support/ R.A.G.E. October 2006 2 3 Yesterday’s Women: the story of R.A.G.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Well Right to the End
    1 Special Interest Group for Philosophy and Ethics Living Well Right to the End Rydal Hall, June 26th to 29th, 2017 2 Contents Living Well Right to the End Introduction 4 Peter Wemyss-Gorman Living with the uncertainty of Cancer 6 Karol Sikora Taking Care of the person in chronic illness 20 Sara Booth Creative approaches to palliative care 35 Kate Binnie Living to die 43 Andy Graydon Coming alive at last 52 Jeremy Swayne To let the patient live and die with dignity 57 Sophie-Freda Borge Contemplative care 65 Narapa Steve Johnson Healing while dying 77 Emmylou Rahtz My recent training in hypnosis 87 Tim Johnson Valuing end of life care 90 Peter Bennett Homeward bound 96 Gillian Bartram 3 Editor Peter Wemyss-Gorman Retired Consultant in Pain Medicine Contributors Karol Sikora, Consultant Oncologist and Dean, University of Buckingham Medical School Sara Booth Honorary Consultant in Palliative Care, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust and Associate Lecturer, Cambridge University Kate Binnie Music therapist and teacher of yoga and mindfulness in palliative care Father Andy Graydon Catholic Priest and hospital chaplain, working in palliative care, mental health and chronic pain Jeremy Swayne Retired GP, homoeopathist and Anglican priest Sophie-Freda Borge Nurse Specialist in Anaesthetics and Palliative Care, Norway Narapa Steve Johnson Buddhist Chaplain and Mindfulness Teacher Emmylou Rahtz Associate Research Fellow, Exeter University Tim Johnson Consultant in Pain Medicine, Salford Peter Bennett Retired senior civil servant, Department of Health. Associate Faculty Member. Science Policy Research Unit, Sussex University Gillian Bartlam Hypnotherapist and Psychotherapist. Professional singer 4 Introduction Peter Wemyss-Gorman I first suggested the theme of this meeting to our steering committee last year after I read the wonderful book Being Mortal by Atul Gawande.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Cancer Care Nick Bosanquet and Karol Sikora Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-18380-2 - The Economics of Cancer Care Nick Bosanquet and Karol Sikora Frontmatter More information The Economics of Cancer Care This book examines the interaction of economics and the delivery of cancer care in the global context. It analyses the causes of tension between those paying for care, those providing the care and those marketing drugs and devices for cancer. The concept and requirement for rationing is examined in different economic environments. As cancer increases in incidence and prevalence, the economics becomes a far more important subject than ever before. Written by a leading health economist and oncologist, this is the first comprehensive book on the eco- nomics of cancer and is a must have for health professionals and policy makers alike. Nick Bosanquet is Professor of Health Policy at Imperial College London, UK, and is Special Advisor to the House of Commons Health Committee. Karol Sikora is Visiting Professor of Cancer Medicine, Imperial College and Dean of the Brunel-Buckingham Medical School. He was formerly Chief of the WHO Cancer Programme. We would like to thank Kate Bosanquet and Gill Miller for editorial assistance – much appreciated. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-18380-2 - The Economics of Cancer Care Nick Bosanquet and Karol Sikora Frontmatter More information The Economics of Cancer Care Nick Bosanquet Professor of Health Policy Imperial College Karol Sikora Dean, Brunel-Buckingham Medical School
    [Show full text]
  • Alumni E-Magazine
    Alumni E-Magazine The University of Buckingham Alumni Office | June 2019 Festival of Higher Education Medical School Awarded GMC Accreditation WELCOME ANNOUNCEMENTS Dear all, This month we have the first Medical School graduation. It seems impossible that four and a half years have gone by since the first intake of medical students. Now, after all their hard work (and the risk they took in joining the first private medical school in more than 200 years) they are able to celebrate their own individual achievements, but also the achievement of accreditation of the Medical School by the General Medical Council (GMC). What a year! Professor Mike Cawthorne, who sadly died just before the first intake of students, would be so proud. Dr Terence Kealey, who was instrumental in setting up the School, will be receiving an Honorary Degree. Professor Karol Sikora, Dean, must be so thrilled that all the hard work in the years prior to the opening of the School now see the fruition of such intense planning. In the next issue there will be photos and a little more background. Also this month we have our “Festival Week”. The Festival of Higher Education (now in its third year) will take place on campus on 26 and 27 June (with a marquee set up on Beloff Lawn for the whole week). Please see the next page for information on who is speaking and how you can obtain tickets. This is followed on 28 June by the Enterprise Festival (EntFest), sponsored by the Peter Jones Foundation, which will see around 1,000 students from all over the country come to Buckingham for their own graduation from the Peter Jones Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Diagnostics, Treatment and Prevention the Latest Innovations from the UK and Europe
    Supported by Cancer diagnostics, treatment and prevention The latest innovations from the UK and Europe Networking event: 24 October 2007, 1 Great George Street, London Who should attend? Speakers include: Chief Executives, CTOs, CSOs, Directors, Heads and Senior Researchers involved in the areas of oncology Claire Horton diagnostics, drug discovery and therapeutics; as well as senior DTI - FP7UK academics from research institutions within London, South East and the East. Richard Sullivan Cancer Research UK Benefits of attending: • GAIN an overview of the latest cancer research and funding Chris Buckley opportunities through FP7 GE Healthcare • LEARN ABOUT cutting-edge technological developments in Karol Sikora cancer diagnostics and surgery Imperial College School • DETERMINE new technologies for cancer drug discovery of Medicine • DISCOVER emerging cancer treatment and prevention Michelle Penny technologies Pfizer • EVALUATE the available opportunities for collaborative research and partnerships between industry and academia Stephen Ward Onyvax About us Clive Morris London Technology Network is a not-for-profit organisation. We Astrazeneca help companies succeed through technology-intensive innovation. Chas Bountra GlaxoSmithKline Supported by Neil Thompson Astex For further information, contact [email protected] © LTN 2007 programme may be subject to change Cancer diagnostics, treatment and prevention The latest innovations from the UK and Europe 24 October 2007, 1 Great George Street, London 8.45 Event registration 10.35 Investigating
    [Show full text]
  • Tribune 25 Template V2009
    C M C M Y K Y K WEATHER TRY OUR DOUBLE FILET-O-FISH ANY TIME...ANY PLACE, WE’RE #1 HIGH 88F The Tribune LOW 75F T-STORM IN SPOTS BAHAMAS EDITION www.tribune242.com Volume: 105 No.256 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2009 PRICE – 75¢ (Abaco and Grand Bahama $1.25) Choosing CARS FOR SALE, Honour for S E S the right E R T D HELP WANTED I U R S T O ‘SEA WOLF’ N A P I AND REAL ESTATE E Relationships S F SEE WOMAN SECTION BAHAMAS BIGGEST SEE PAGE NINE TRAVOLTA TRIAL: Women charged WEEK TWO ‘Bridgewater’s meeting with Travolta lawyer in pilot murder secretly recorded’ f f FORMER PLP a t Defendants aged 20 and 19 in court s Senator Pleasant e n Bridgewater and u b former premedic i r T Tarino / e Lightbourne Pair also accused of attempted murder k r a lawyer Carlson l C By NATARIO McKENZIE Shurland m Tribune Staff Reporter i yesterday. [email protected] T By NATARIO TWO young women McKENZIE charged with the murder of Tribune Staff Reporter Bahamasair pilot Lionel [email protected] McQueen were arraigned in Magistrate’s Court yesterday. AN attorney for Hollywood celebrity John Travolta Genear McKenzie, 20, of allowed police to set up recording devices in his hotel Warren Street alias “Nettie”, room for a meeting with former PLP Senator Pleasant and Rhonda Knowles, 19, of Bridgewater, it was revealed in court Monday. Winton Estates, alias “Ganja Bridgewater and former ambulance driver Tarino Baby”, have been charged with the murder of McQueen, SEE page 12 29.
    [Show full text]