DOCSLIB.ORG

Robert Penn Warren Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Robert Penn Warren Studies Robert Penn Warren Studies Volume 1 Article 5 2001 Robert Penn Warren: The Anxiety of Critical Influence Charlotte H. Beck Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/rpwstudies Part of the American Literature Commons, and the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Beck, Charlotte H. (2001) "Robert Penn Warren: The Anxiety of Critical Influence," Robert Penn Warren Studies: Vol. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/rpwstudies/vol1/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Robert Penn Warren Studies by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Robert Penn Warren: The Anxiety of Critical Influence CHARLOTTE H. BECK Although he was the author of more than ninety-one essays, two volumes of collected essays, sixty-two reviews, and critical introduc­ tions in numerous textbook anthologies of literature, Robert Penn Warren consistently denied that he was a literary critic.As Leonard Casper and others have accurately stated, Warren "belittled" his crit­ ical persona, considering himself a poet first, fiction writer second, and a sort of critical hack last of all. Likewise, in a 1978 TV inter­ view with Dick Cavett, Wmrnn equivocated: "I write a lot of criti­ cism, and I've done some teaching, which is a form of criticism, but I don't feel that is a profession. I feel that is pmt of my social life, talking about books I have read to somebody, or writing about them, and usually the books that I've written ... sort of come out of talk­ ing, out of classes." From his Vanderbilt days, when he wrote poetry, but not criticism, for The Fugitive and later at Oxford, WaITen thought of himself as a developing poet and reluctant scholar and dis­ tinguished himself from Cleanth Brooks, who was even then working out his own critical position. Warren later wrote that at Oxford, Brooks made available to him "the opening world of poetry and poet­ ic criticism and theory," while he was "so hot at the immediate task of trying to writ� poems that I had missed a certain enrichment for that practical task" of critical analysis, although he had listened, at Vanderbilt, to "a lot of subtle and learned talk" from Allen Tate and John Crowe Ransom.' When he was forced to produce a scholarly thesis in order to satisfy requirements for the Oxford B.Lit., Warren had a great deal of difficulty finding a subject, and when he finally decided to write on Marston's satires, he pursued the task with less than scholarly enthusiasm, although the final result was more than satisfactory from a scholar's viewpoint.' 25 Robert Penn Warren neve1iheless wrote criticism, beginning as "Interchapter, A Manifesto for Antithetical Criticism," in which he early as 1927 and continuing until the end of his life, for a variety of finds it possible, with but a slight adjustment, to make room for crit­ pragmatic reasons, chiefly for much-needed money. As he remarked ics: "Poets' misinterpretations of poems are more drastic than critics' in a 1970 interview with Ruth Fisher, writing criticism was for him, misinterpretations of criticism, but this is only a difference in degree at best, a teaching strategy or, at worst, "busy-work and nothing and not at all in kind. There are no interpretations but only misinter­ more-and a job, sometimes with a pay check."' From Vanderbilt on, pretations, and so all criticism is prose poetry ... For just as a poet however, WmTen functioned as part of an expanding circle of writers must be found by the opening in a precursor poet, so must the critic. whose nucleus was the former Fugitive group and which later became The difference is that a critic has more parents .. poets and critics." known as the New Critics. Why, then, was Robert Penn Warren so For Warren, as a junior member of the Fugitive circle, the most for­ reluctant to own up to being a literary critic? midable father-figure was John Crowe Ransom, from whose over­ Beyond his stronger desire to make a name for himself as a poet bearing presence there was no easy escape. Although Warren attend­ and writer of fiction, there was also a certain humility toward the crit­ ed the Fugitive meetings during his student days, his reason for doing ic's task that seemed to limit his pride in making formal pronounce­ so was to learn how to write poetry. He served for a year as editor of !i'' ments about literature. He consistently separated himself from the The Fugitive but published no criticism following the examples of "real" critics, those who "are systematic, want to force the thing Ransom and Tate. After publishing his essay "The Briar Patch" in I'll through to its ultimates. I. A. Richards, Cleanth Brooks, or Ransom, Take My Stand, Warren, along with Brooks, began to distance himself they are people who must try to drive the thing through, you know, from the Agrarian cause. A much more pervasive "father" was the and whose way of study is in that direction." Warren added that for same poet-critic who influenced much of Warren's early poetry, T. S. him, "it's a very different thing, whether it's reading criticism or an Eliot. Harold Bloom has stated quite forcefully that Eliot was essay I'd written. Because it's usually ad hoc, came out of the class­ Warren's strong precursor both "as poet and as critic."' So strong room, or it's come out of my interests."4 were Ransom's and Eliot's influences that they may have caused Warren never maintained that he had the last word on any liter­ Wairnn's failure to accept the title of critic even as he caITied out its ary text, always insisting that he was a progressivist in regard to inter­ function. pretation. Contrary to the commonly held definition of the New In all applications of his theory, Bloom has outlined what he calls Critic, Wmrnn believed that however objective the critic might try to six "revisionary ratios"-Clinamen, Tessera, Kenosis, Daemonization, be, how personally removed from the task of interpretation, he or she Askesis, and Apophrades�to describe how the anxious writer deals will be identified intellectually, and therefore personally, with his or with the specter of his stronger precursor. Three ofthese -ke11osis, cli- her reading of a text and must take personal responsibi I ity for it. 11ame11, and tessera,'' are applicable to Wmrnn's anxiety of critical There is a strong possibility, also, that Warren was afflicted with influence. Warren's criticism exhibits kenosis first, as he empties his a multiple case of what Harold Bloom has called the "anxiety of criticism of his own original concepts and structures in order to give influence." Although Bloom's terminology refers specifically to expression to those of his critical fathers, unless or until he can adopt poets, he has inserted into his book 71,e Anxiety of Influence an the more fruitful strategy of clinamen, swerving away from his pre- 26 27 cursor in criticism in order to find an approach more particular to his irony is constant, based on an "objectification of this little interior temperament and genius. Finally, after the death of Eliot and the drama," i.e., the conflict between thought and feeling. Both Davidson aging of Ransom left him free from their pressure, WatTen could, and Ransom have dealt with "the relation of the artist to the ordered, through tessera, enlarge and extend the scope of his precursors' crit­ or disordered, society in which he happens to live," but Ransom's ical vision in synthesis with his own. poetry "has been less local in materials." Ransom's main focus "is the Over a period of more than thirty years, Warren published three disruption of sensibility," an issue that "has two aspects: man is a essays on Ransom, his former teacher and mentor. Ransom is among creature little lower than the angels and, at the same time, of the brute the poets discussed in "A Note on Three Southern Poets," published creation; again, there is a conflict between the scientific vision of in May 1932, while two other articles, published in 1935 and 1968, quantity and the poetic vision concerned with quality." This disasso­ treat Ransom alone. All three of the essays have more to say about ciation brings about the tensions which produce Ransomian irony: Ransom's poetry than his criticism and imply regret that in Ransom's "the poet cannot solve his problem by an act of will, but he can career criticism replaced poetry. Early in his own poetic career, attempt to work out some smt of equilibrium that may permit him, Warren must have feared that he would mimic Ransom, as well as even though at odds with himself, to continue the practice of his art." Coleridge and Matthew Arnold, by mutating early from poetry, his The similarity between Ransom's "disruption" and Eliot's "dissocia­ work fueled by imagination, to criticism, fed on the dried crusts of tion" of sensibility allows Warren to privilege Ransom and Eliot over other writers' work. Fletcher and Davidson, although he distinguishes Ransom's situa­ fn "A Note on Three Southern Poets," Ransom comes off better tional irony from Eliot's "irony of historical basis, the juxtaposition than his two Agrarian brethren, John Gould Fletcher and Donald of a degenerate present with the noble past."" At this juncture, Davidson. Warren attributes to each of the three poets legitimate WmTen, the fledgling critic, could safely live under the sheltering claim to "the debatable distinction of being a Southern poet" as aegises of Eliot and Ransom and still develop as a poet and critic.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tennessee State Library and Archives RANSOM FAMILY PAPERS 1833
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 RANSOM FAMILY PAPERS 1833-1957 Processed by: Mary Washington Frazer Archival Technical Services Accession Number: 67-107, 71-149, 71-153 Date Completed: October 4, 1971 Location: II-K-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Microfilm Accession Number: 1255 MICROFILMED INTRODUCTION This collection of Ransom Family Papers was made by Miss Ellene Ransom (1894 - 1963) and was given to the Manuscript Unit of the Tennessee State Library and Archives after her death by her friends, Miss Frances McLester and Mrs. Edgar H. Duncan of Nashville, Tennessee. The materials in this collection measure 10.92 linear feet. There are no restrictions on the materials. Single photocopies of unpublished writings in the Ransom Family Papers may be made for purposes of scholarly research. SCOPE AND CONTENT The Ransom Family Papers, consisting of about 5,400 items and 21 volumes and covering the years 1833-1957, are composed of correspondence, clippings, accounts, legal documents, biographical and genealogical data, data regarding the Brazilian Mission of the Methodist Episcopal Church (South), family records, letter books, music programs and music club scrapbooks, family photographs, sermons, and writings. This is a collection of Ransom family papers beginning with the Reverend Robert Paine Ransom, a Methodist minister who settled in Rutherford County, Tennessee in the first half of the nineteenth century. Included are about seventy-five letters written by this minister from 1869 to 1885, primarily to his son, John James Ransom. They are good letters covering a critical period both of Southern and church history.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Harold Bloom José Antonio Gurpegui Universidad De
    Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 9 (1996): 165-181 An Interview with Harold Bloom José Antonio Gurpegui Universidad de Alcalá José Antonio Gurpegui: What's the reason for writing a book about the Western Canon, particularly now? Harold Bloom: Well, this brings one to the question of a national context: in fact people in American universities and colleges and in the secondary schools and in academies throughout the English-speaking world, are very much worried about canonical matters because a tremendous debate has been going on now for about the last twenty years or so, which in one very bad sense is settled: that the people who would argüe for humanistic education, in English at least (the study of the traditional Western Canon, from Homer through Shakespeare, Cervantes and Tolstoy, down to Marcel Proust, say, or Samuel Beckett), we have been defeated. A traditional Western Canon is largely not studied anymore in American colleges, universities, preparatory schools, secondary schools, and this is trae also in Australia, New Zealand, Canadá, Great Britain, and so forth. But the personal reason is really quite different, and had nothing to do with polemic. I am a literary critic in my middle sixties; Tve been writing about literature, publishing on literature since 1957.1've been a student of literature really from the time I was a very small boy; in any language I could teach myself to read. And I've written a number of books, and I just thought it was time that I write a kind of general study of literature, trying to see if I could isolate those qualities that in the end unify Shakespeare, Cervantes, Dante, Chaucer, Tolstoy, and so on, and trying to extend Walter Pater's notion of the aesthetic or Osear Wilde's notion of the aesthetic to a kind of general defense of the aesthetic study of literature.
    [Show full text]
  • William Faulkner, Richard M. Weaver, and the Crisis of Modernity
    Divine Philosophies of Two Southern Gentlemen: William Faulkner, Richard M. Weaver, and the Crisis of Modernity Submitted by Vickie Lynn Caudle A thesis submitted i n partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Northeastern State University December 2015 ii Divine Philoso ph ies of Two Southern Gen tlemen: Will iam Faulkner, Richard M. Weave r, and the Crisis of Moderni ty Vickie Lynn Caudle Th is th esis is approv .for recom mend ation to the Graduate College / / 2 Dean, Graduate College, Date 3 Abstract This thesis is an examination of the response in writing of two Southern writers, William Faulkner and Richard M. Weaver, to the crisis of modernity. In looking at some of the changes brought about in the society as well as problems created, these two Southern sons respond to the same and offer some solutions through Platonic ideas or concepts of the metaphysical as is shown in their narrative and philosophical work. Two of the early works of Faulkner, The Unvanquished and Sanctuary, as well as three of the essays of Weaver, "The Phaedrus and the Nature of Rhetoric," "To Write the Truth," and "The Power of the Word," are considered. Weaver offers a powerful critique of modernity and the problems associated with it. Faulkner's offering is less direct, as his is through the creative response of narrative. Both demonstrate how the evils of modernity can be countered by a combination of dialectic and right rhetoric rooted in a commitment to the ideas of the metaphysical. 4 Acknowledgements I would like to thank everyone who has listened to, encouraged, and supported me throughout this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • John Crowe Ransom Tribute Collection
    JOHN CROWE RANSOM TRIBUTE COLLECTION MSS # 360 Arranged and described by Molly Dohrmann December 2007 SPECIAL COLLECTIONS Jean and Alexander Heard Library Vanderbilt University 419 21st. Avenue South Nashville, Tennessee 37240 Telephone: (615) 322-2807 © Vanderbilt University Special Collections Historical and Biographical Note On June 10, 1937 John Crowe Ransom was honored at a tribute dinner in Nashville, Tennessee as he prepared to leave his position at Vanderbilt and go to Kenyon College in Ohio to continue his career as a poet, teacher, and critic. This small collection consists of 39 tributes to Ransom composed and sent by colleagues and friends who were not able to be present at the dinner. The invitation came from Donald Davidson and Allen Tate on behalf of the Committee for the Ransom Dinner. Ransom was born in 1888. He graduated from Vanderbilt University and went to Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar. He taught English at Vanderbilt until he accepted a Chair in Poetry position at Kenyon College in 1937, and there founded and edited The Kenyon Review. John Crowe Ransom was one of the Fugitive poets who published poetry in Nashville in the early 1920’s. He also contributed an essay to I’ll Take My Stand, the Agrarian manifesto published in 1930. Ransom was instrumental in developing what came to be called the New Criticism. He wrote and was internationally recognized for his poetry, his lifelong vocation, as well as for his teaching and works of criticism. He died in 1974 at the age of eighty six. Scope and Content Note This small collection consists of 39 letters and telegrams paying tribute and homage to John Crowe Ransom from friends and colleagues who were not able to be present at the dinner honoring Ransom in Nashville on June 10, 1937.
    [Show full text]
  • El Escritor Y Las Normas Del Canon Literario (The Writer and the Norms of the Literary Canon)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 477 340 CS 512 067 AUTHOR Policarpo, Alcibiades TITLE El Escritor y las Normas del Canon Literario (The Writer and the Norms of the Literary Canon). PUB DATE 2001-02-12 NOTE 14p.; In: The National Association of African American Studies, National Association of Hispanic & Latino Studies, National Association of Native American Studies, and International Association of Asian Studies 2001 Monograph Series. Proceedings (Houston, TX, February 12-17, 2001). PUB TYPE Opinion Papers (120) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) LANGUAGE Spanish EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MFO1 /PCO1 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Authors; *Latin American Literature; Literary Criticism; *Novels IDENTIFIERS Fuentes (Carlos); Garcia Marquez (Gabriel); *Literary Canon; Vargas Llosa (Mario) ABSTRACT This paper speculates about whether a literary canon exists in contemporary Latin Atherican literature, particularly in the prose genre. The paper points to Carlos Fuentes, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, and Mario Vargas Llosa as the three authors who might form this traditional and liberal canon with their works "La Muerte de Artemio Cruz" (Fuentes), "Cien Anos de Soledad" (Garcia Marquez), and "La Cuiudad y los Perros" (Vargas Llosa). It discusses how the idea of a literary canon came about originally and how the canon of Latin American literature seems to be based mostly on the votes of publishing houses, reviews, anthologies, and preferences of academics. The paper states that, in a 1995 study Joan Brown and Crista Johnson found: "The present study indicates that there is currently no canon of 20th century prose fiction for Spanish or Spanish American literature, if "canonical" is defined as a work's presence on every reading list.
    [Show full text]
  • John Crowe Ransom
    JOHN CROWE RANSOM and JOSEPH EDGAR SIMMONS CORRESPONDENCE COLLECTION MSS # 359 Arranged and described by Molly Dohrmann December 2007 SPECIAL COLLECTIONS Jean and Alexander Heard Library Vanderbilt University 419 21st. Avenue South Nashville, Tennessee 37240 Telephone: (615) 322-2807 © Vanderbilt University Special Collections Biographical Note John Crowe Ransom was born in 1888. He graduated from Vanderbilt University and went to Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar. He taught English at Vanderbilt until he accepted a Chair in Poetry position at Kenyon College in 1937, and there founded and edited The Kenyon Review. John Crowe Ransom was one of the Fugitive poets who published poetry in Nashville in the early 1920’s. He also contributed an essay to I’ll Take My Stand, the Agrarian manifesto published in 1930. Ransom was instrumental in developing what came to be called the New Criticism. He wrote and was internationally recognized for his poetry, his lifelong vocation, as well as for his teaching and works of criticism. He died in 1974 at the age of eighty six. Joseph Edgar Simmons taught English at DePauw College, William and Mary College in Virginia, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, and at Mississippi College in Clinton, Mississippi. Over the period of the almost seven years of this correspondence, Simmons wrote to Mr. Ransom regularly, often requesting comments on his poetry and philosophic writings and asking for recommendations as he tried to find new teaching positions. This collection is a record of John Crowe Ransom’s response to the letters sent by Simmons. Scope and Content Note The letters in this small collection were written between September 17, 1959 and June 30, 1966 from John Crowe Ransom to Joseph Edgar Simmons, an aspiring poet and teacher.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Notes on Harold Bloom's the Anxiety of Znhuence
    Treaties and Studies Sch. Allied Med. Sci. 57 Shinshu Unlv. vol. 14, 1, 1988 Some Notes on Harold Bloom's The Anxiety of ZnHuence Kazuko Narusawa Harold Bloom (born in 1930), Professor of the Humanities at Yale Univer- sity, is known as one of the four Yale "Derridians'', and ilaS necessarily advanced down the path of American Deconstruction, His nature asa liter･ ary critic, and his criticalactivities, however, are apparently different from those of his Yale colleagues, Paul de Man, Geoffrey Hartman and Hillis Miller (now de Man has been dead since 1983, and Miller has gone to the University of California). Though he worked with them, and even with I)errida in the symposium Deconstruction and Criticism (1979), "he has fre- quently and explicitly dissociated himself from deconstructionist principles and methods.''1) His critical approach resembles no one else's and may be unique: "Bloom is very much his own man, one of the most ideosyncratic critics writing today. "2) For 王～loom, the understanding of a literary work means not "seeking to understand any single poem as an entity",3) but seeking to understand it in the relation of other literary works. Major poets, he insists, should de丘ne the orlglnality of the works against the works of their poetic prede- cessors. His remarkable knowledge of English and American poetry, espe- cially Romantic and post Romantic poetry enables him to compare a 'belated ∫ poet' with a precursor' and to glVe the former a suitable location in the history of literature. In this sense, it is true that Bloom is inauenced by Northrop Frye's archetype theory.
    [Show full text]
  • John Updike and the Grandeur of the American Suburbs Oliver Hadingham, Rikkyo University, Japan the Asian Conference on Literatu
    John Updike and the Grandeur of the American Suburbs Oliver Hadingham, Rikkyo University, Japan The Asian Conference on Literature, Librarianship & Archival Science 2016 Official Conference Proceedings Abstract The standing of John Updike (1932-2009), a multiple prize-winning author of more than 60 books, has suffered over the last two decades. Critics have recognized Updike’s skill as a writer of beautiful prose, but fail to include him among the highest rank of 20th century American novelists. What is most frustrating about the posthumous reputation of Updike is the failure by critics to fully acknowledge what is it about his books that makes them so enduringly popular. Updike combines beautifully crafted prose with something more serious: an attempt to clarify for the reader the truths and texture of America itself. Keywords: John Updike, middle-class, suburbia, postwar America iafor The International Academic Forum www.iafor.org Over the last few decades the reputation of John Updike (1932-2009) has suffered greatly. Updike's doggedness and craft as a writer turned him into a multi-prize winning author of 23 novels, fourteen poetry collections, ten hefty collections of essays, two books of art criticism, a play, some children's books, and numerous short story collections. Yet such a prolific output and the numerous awards won have not placed him among the greats of 20th century American literature. He is remembered as someone who could write elegant prose, but to no lasting effect in articulating something worthwhile. Since the acclaim and prizes showered on Rabbit is Rich (1981) and Rabbit at Rest (1990), Updike has fallen out of favour with the literary world.
    [Show full text]
  • Vmagwtr03 P30-59.Final (Page 30
    By PAUL KINGSBURY, BA’80 The thorny legacy of Vanderbilt’s Fugitives and Agrarians Pride and Prejudice t’s one of the most famous and cherished photographs in Vanderbilt’s history. Allen Tate, Merrill Moore, Robert Penn Warren, John Crowe Ransom, Donald Davidson. Five balding white men, dressed impeccably in suits and ties, are seated outdoors, Iobviously posed by photographer Joe Rudis to appear as if lost in con- versation. Despite the artifice, the subjects seem relaxed and even playful, what with Moore practically sitting on Tate’s lap, Warren lean- ing in as if to insert a word edgewise, and the entire group looking to Allen Tate as if expecting a clever remark. It was a happy moment for the old friends. It was 1956, and after three decades of being ignored by the University, the Fugitives had returned to campus in glory for a colloquium devoted to their literary work. V anderbilt Magazine 31 Heroes Fugitives and Agrarians he five writers photographed in 1956 “Nothing in Vanderbilt’s history has come devoted to the Fugitives and Agrarians. The undergraduate courses on southern litera- were Vanderbilt graduates. They were anywhere close to the Fugitives and Agrari- 1956 reunion was followed by an Agrarian ture to these writers. On the graduate level, Donald Davidson (1893–1968) known as “Fugitives” after The Fugi- ans in giving it a national reputation,”con- reunion and symposium in 1980. That event, Kreyling says master’s and doctoral students BA’17, MA’22; Vanderbilt Ttive, the widely praised but little purchased firms Paul Conkin, distinguished professor though, seemed to mark a high tide for the in his department read them only occasion- English department, poetry magazine they self-published, along of history, emeritus, and the author of defin- Agrarians and Fugitives on campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog 208: New Arrivals Folded and Gathered Signatures
    BETWEENBETWEEN THETHE COVERSCOVERS RARERARE BOOKSBOOKS Catalog 208: New Arrivals Folded and Gathered Signatures 1 Ernest HEMINGWAY A Moveable Feast New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons (1964) $3500 Unbound folded and gathered signatures. Eight signatures (including one of photographs), the first and last signature with endpapers attached. Page edges untrimmed, and consequently the signatures have minor height variations. Fine. A collection of vignettes inspired by the author’s profound nostalgia for the halcyon days of his early career. This is the final pre-binding state before the signatures are sewn together and the pages trimmed. Rare in this format. [BTC#334030] 2 Robert LOWELL Notebook 1967-68 Farrar, Straus, Giroux: New York (1969) $2750 First edition. Fine in about fine dustwrapper with a small crease on the rear flap. From the library of Pulitzer Prize-winning author Peter Taylor and his wife, the National Book Award-nominated poet Eleanor Ross Taylor. Inscribed by Lowell using his nickname: “For Peter and Eleanor with all the love I can scribble. Cal.” Lowell and Peter Taylor were very close friends and colleagues and were instrumental on each other’s careers. They both attended Kenyon College where they were roommates and studied under Allen Tate and John Crowe Ransom. [BTC#355686] BETWEEN THE COVERS RARE BOOKS CATALOG 208: NEW ARRIVALS 112 Nicholson Rd. Terms of Sale: Images are not to scale. Dimensions of items, including artwork, are given width Gloucester City, NJ 08030 first. All items are returnable within 10 days if returned in the same condition as sent. Orders may be reserved by telephone, fax, or email.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Then, Shall Gnosticism Be Found? an Intellectual And
    WHERE THEN, SHALL GNOSTICISM BE FOUND? AN INTELLECTUAL AND RECEPTION HISTORY OF GNOSTICISM IN THE WORK OF HAROLD BLOOM AND THE SHIFT TOWARDS A NEW METHODOLOGY by Lara-Sophie Boleslawsky B.A. (Hons), The University of British Columbia, 2014 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Ancient Culture, Religion, and Ethnicity) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) August 2021 © Lara-Sophie Boleslawsky, 2021 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, a thesis entitled: Where, then, shall Gnosticism be found? An intellectual and reception history of Gnosticism in the Work of Harold Bloom and the shift towards a new methodology submitted by Lara-Sophie Boleslawsky in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Ancient Culture, Religion, and Ethnicity Examining Committee: G. Anthony Keddie, Associate Professor, Classical, Near Eastern, and Religious Studies, UBC Supervisor Robert Cousland, Associate Professor, Classical, Near Eastern, and Religious Studies, UBC Supervisory Committee Member ii Abstract Harold Bloom’s self-professed “strong Gnostic tendencies” manifest themselves in the works that comprise this controversial literary critic’s legacy. This project argues that to neglect Bloom’s preoccupation with Gnosticism is to miss a profound opportunity to shift from the conception of Gnosticism as a static entity capable of study to a Gnosticism that takes the form of a methodology, or dynamic process. Bloom’s early fascination with Gnosticism in the late 1970s offers a unique chance to understand Gnosticism through his most well-known theory of the anxiety of influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Four LDS Views on Harold Bloom
    Four LDS Views on Harold Bloom A Roundtable Four LDS Views on Harold Bloom HAROLD BLOOM. The American Religion: The Emergence of the Post- Christian Nation. New York: Touchstone with Simon and Schuster, 1993. 271 pp. Index. Paperback, $12.00. Introduction M. Gerald Bradford Every now and then a book is written about Mormonism which by all accounts is fascinating, meaning that it both attracts and repels its readers. On the whole, the insights in such books override their points of inaccuracy. The authors of such works usu- ally stand outside the LDS tradition, are recognized as intellectuals, and come from the world of academia. Nearly forty years ago, for example, Thomas F. O’Dea wrote The Mormons (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957). His treatment of Latter-day Saints, ostensibly from a sociological per- spective but going far beyond any single discipline, was just such a book. Coming to his subject from a somewhat modified Marxist view, O’Dea revealed, between the lines, that he had a soft spot in his heart for the Mormons and that, in some important respect, he had genuinely understood what was distinctive and worthwhile about the religion. Another equally fascinating book about the Mormons and other religious groups in the United States is Harold Bloom’s The American Religion. Bloom is an internationally recognized liter- ary critic. What he says about the LDS tradition, Joseph Smith, and the future of the Church, has engendered a wide range of responses. Accordingly, BYU Studies has gathered four discus- sions of this book, one by an essayist, another by a Mormon BYU Studies 35, no.
    [Show full text]