DOCSLIB.ORG

Violations of Media Freedoms in Palestine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Violations of Media Freedoms in Palestine Violations of Media Freedoms in Palestine ANNUAL2020 REPORT Violations of Media Freedoms in Palestine ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Conducted by: General Supervision and Audit Mousa Rimawi Prepared and Edited: Ghazi Bani Odeh Coordination: Shireen Al-Khatib Project coordinator: Sharif Haj Ali Documentation: Field researchers in the West Bank and Gaza MADA’s coordinator in Gaza Strip: Ahmad Hammad Dissemination: Rasha Sarhan Violations of Media Freedoms in Palestine ANNUAL REPORT 2020 © All rights reserved 2020 The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms MADA This report has been prepared with the support of European Union The content of this report does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. المحتوياتCONTENTS فهرسTABLE OF Introduction: ........................................................................................ 5 Israeli Violations .................................................................................. 8 The Most Serious Israeli Violations ............................................................9 Physical Assaults ........................................................................................10 Arrests ..............................................................................................................13 Targeting Media Agencies ......................................................................15 Prevention from Coverage .................................................................... 16 Facebook Company Violations ........................................................18 Palestinian Violations .......................................................................20 Palestinian Violations in the West Bank .................................................21 Palestinian Violations in Gaza Strip ........................................................ 22 Physical Assaults ....................................................................................... 24 Arrests and Torture .................................................................................. 25 Summoning and Questioning ..............................................................27 Recommendations ............................................................................ 28 Details of Violations .......................................................................... 29 INTRODUCTION Despite the decline in the number of violations that were monitored and documented during the year 2020, the state of media freedoms in Palestine has not witnessed any real positive and tangible developments that would serve to move away from the path of practices and trends that prevailed during the preceding years. The decline in the number of violations that were recorded this year was not a result of conditions that reduced the contact between the media, journalists and perpetrators of attacks, but rather, it was a result of the spread of the pandemic, and the measures to combat it through lockdowns and limiting movement. Another reason is also the halting of Gaza’s “Great Marches of Return” which are peaceful protests that took place near the separating fence in the Gaza Strip.1 The year 2020 began with a nearly full closure, during which citizens were locked home for nearly two months. Therefore, all aspects of activity and potential contact were almost completely paralyzed, which led among other results to reducing the chances of violations against journalists that occur mostly in the field and decreasing them to almost zero. The same applies in varying degrees over most of the months of the past year, as almost every month of the year 2020 has witnessed various lockdown measures depending on the overall situation, this included complete closure of certain governorates. The pandemic has also led to a general decrease in the number and size of various popular protest activities which usually entail interaction and direct contact with journalists that often lead to attacks against journalists who cover them. In addition to the repercussions of the Corona pandemic and the measures it imposed, the stopping of the Great Marches of Return in Gaza Strip has led to a reduction in the Israeli violations in the Gaza to reach zero, unlike previous years, due to the absence of almost any opportunity for contact, as well as the continuous blockade on the Gaza that reinforces the “absence of direct contact”. With regard to social media companies, they have continued the same approach in fighting Palestinian content; which is portrayed in closing and blocking dozens of pages of journalists or media institutions, with various arguments related to what they call “violating their publishing standards” or claiming that this is a result of what they consider “incitement.” î Violations: The year 2020 witnessed a decline in the total number of violations against media freedoms in Palestine. This was a result of three main factors as the following: 1 The Peaceful marches of return were launched on 3/30/2018 and continued to be organized on a weekly and semi-regular basis with the participation of thousands of citizens until they stopped at the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020. The marches witnessed widespread attacks affecting dozens of journalists and that were covering the event, which amounted to the death of two journalists who were covering the marches by the Israeli soldiers. 2020 Violations of Media Freedoms in Palestine 5 First: The decrease in popular activities against the occupation and settlements in the West Bank, and the cessation of popular marches at the borders of the Gaza Strip, which led to the disappearance of the Israeli occupation’s attacks there, knowing that the Israeli Occupation is considered the primary perpetrator and one with the most dangerous attacks committed against journalists and the media in Palestine. Second: The lockdown measures that have been taken as part of the public endeavors to combat the Corona pandemic and the consequent reduction in the opportunities for direct contact between journalists and security services. Third: The operations of fighting Palestinian content carried out by social media networks, foremost of which is Facebook, and what it has done during the past years in terms of blocking and closing the pages of hundreds of journalists, pushing Palestinian journalists to practice self-censorship over what they publish; out of fear and anticipation of closing their pages or banning them from publishing through them, which led, in one of its results, to a decrease in the number of violations committed by Facebook against Palestinian journalists, compared to what it was in the previous year.2 (Violations against media freedoms in Palestine in the year 2020 based on the party that committed the violation) Israel Israel Palestinian Palestinian Social Media Party Others Total (WB) (GS) parties (WB) parties (GS) Platforms Number 210 5 37 59 95 2 408 2 Note: Facebook’s violations against media outlets and journalists decreased relatively from last year, despite the fact that the general total number against various Palestinian groups increased, indicating that the decline did not come from Facebook as much as it was the result of extra caution by journalists and their practice of self-censorship for what they post. 6 2020 Violations of Media Freedoms in Palestine (Violations against journalists and media freedoms in Palestine during the past ten years) Social Palestinian Occupation’s media Year Parties’ Others Total violations platforms violations violations 2011 100 106 0 0 206 2012 164 74 0 0 238 2013 151 78 0 0 229 2014 351 114 0 0 465 2015 407 192 0 0 599 2016 249 134 0 0 383 2017 376 154 0 0 530 2018 455 129 0 0 584 2019 297 200 181 0 678 2020 215 96 95 2 408 Total 2765 1277 276 2 4320 During the year 2020, the Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms “MADA” has monitored and documented a total of 408 violations in the West Bank (including occupied Jerusalem) and Gaza Strip, of which the Israeli occupation committed 215 attacks (equivalent to about 53%)3 while various Palestinian parties committed a total of 96 violations in the West Bank and Gaza (about 24%), and social media companies committed 95 violations (about 23%), while other parties committed other violations.4 These attacks affected a total of 250 people, including 230 (male) journalists, 20 (female) journalists, and 6 media institutions employing dozens of journalists, making such attacks that are targeting media institutions among the most serious violations of press freedom; due to its direct, indirect or far-reaching results and repercussions. For example, the Israeli occupation authorities closed off the offices of Palestine TV in the city of Jerusalem and continues to prevent it from operating there, as well as prohibiting the work and appearance of all its staff members there for the second year in a row.5 3 When calculating the percentage of violations by each side, the fractions were rounded to the nearest whole number. 4 These two violations are: the burning of the car of the writer, Nadia Harhash, while it was in front of her home in Jerusalem by an unknown party, and the second is the dismissal of journalist Iyad Hamad by the administration of the Associated Press. 5 On November 20, 2010, a force of the Israeli occupation police and intelligence raided the Palestine TV office in Jerusalem, which is hosted by the Al-Arz Company, searched it, confiscated its contents, interrogated and summoned television workers, and closed it by a decision issued by the Israeli Minister of 2020
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Bank Barrier Route Projections July 2009
    United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs LEBANON SYRIA West Bank Barrier Route Projections July 2009 West Bank Gaza Strip JORDAN Barta'a ISRAEL ¥ EGYPT Area Affected r The Barrier’s total length is 709 km, more than e v i twice the length of the 1949 Armistice Line R n (Green Line) between the West Bank and Israel. W e s t B a n k a d r o The total area located between the Barrier J and the Green Line is 9.5 % of the West Bank, Qalqilya including East Jerusalem and No Man's Land. Qedumim Finger When completed, approximately 15% of the Barrier will be constructed on the Green Line or in Israel with 85 % inside the West Bank. Biddya Area Populations Affected Ari’el Finger If the Barrier is completed based on the current route: Az Zawiya Approximately 35,000 Palestinians holding Enclave West Bank ID cards in 34 communities will be located between the Barrier and the Green Line. The majority of Palestinians with East Kafr Aqab Jerusalem ID cards will reside between the Barrier and the Green Line. However, Bir Nabala Enclave Biddu Palestinian communities inside the current Area Shu'fat Camp municipal boundary, Kafr Aqab and Shu'fat No Man's Land Camp, are separated from East Jerusalem by the Barrier. Ma’ale Green Line Adumim Settlement Jerusalem Bloc Approximately 125,000 Palestinians will be surrounded by the Barrier on three sides. These comprise 28 communities; the Biddya and Biddu areas, and the city of Qalqilya. ISRAEL Approximately 26,000 Palestinians in 8 Gush a communities in the Az Zawiya and Bir Nabala Etzion e Enclaves will be surrounded on four sides Settlement S Bloc by the Barrier, with a tunnel or road d connection to the rest of the West Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Nablus Salfit Tubas Tulkarem
    Iktaba Al 'Attara Siris Jaba' (Jenin) Tulkarem Kafr Rumman Silat adh DhahrAl Fandaqumiya Tubas Kashda 'Izbat Abu Khameis 'Anabta Bizzariya Khirbet Yarza 'Izbat al Khilal Burqa (Nablus) Kafr al Labad Yasid Kafa El Far'a Camp Al Hafasa Beit Imrin Ramin Ras al Far'a 'Izbat Shufa Al Mas'udiya Nisf Jubeil Wadi al Far'a Tammun Sabastiya Shufa Ijnisinya Talluza Khirbet 'Atuf An Naqura Saffarin Beit Lid Al Badhan Deir Sharaf Al 'Aqrabaniya Ar Ras 'Asira ash Shamaliya Kafr Sur Qusin Zawata Khirbet Tall al Ghar An Nassariya Beit Iba Shida wa Hamlan Kur 'Ein Beit el Ma Camp Beit Hasan Beit Wazan Ein Shibli Kafr ZibadKafr 'Abbush Al Juneid 'Azmut Kafr Qaddum Nablus 'Askar Camp Deir al Hatab Jit Sarra Salim Furush Beit Dajan Baqat al HatabHajja Tell 'Iraq Burin Balata Camp 'Izbat Abu Hamada Kafr Qallil Beit Dajan Al Funduq ImmatinFar'ata Rujeib Madama Burin Kafr Laqif Jinsafut Beit Furik 'Azzun 'Asira al Qibliya 'Awarta Yanun Wadi Qana 'Urif Khirbet Tana Kafr Thulth Huwwara Odala 'Einabus Ar Rajman Beita Zeita Jamma'in Ad Dawa Jafa an Nan Deir Istiya Jamma'in Sanniriya Qarawat Bani Hassan Aqraba Za'tara (Nablus) Osarin Kifl Haris Qira Biddya Haris Marda Tall al Khashaba Mas-ha Yasuf Yatma Sarta Dar Abu Basal Iskaka Qabalan Jurish 'Izbat Abu Adam Talfit Qusra Salfit As Sawiya Majdal Bani Fadil Rafat (Salfit) Khirbet Susa Al Lubban ash Sharqiya Bruqin Farkha Qaryut Jalud Kafr ad Dik Khirbet Qeis 'Ammuriya Khirbet Sarra Qarawat Bani Zeid (Bani Zeid al Gharb Duma Kafr 'Ein (Bani Zeid al Gharbi)Mazari' an Nubani (Bani Zeid qsh Shar Khirbet al Marajim 'Arura (Bani Zeid qsh Sharqiya) Bani Zeid 'Abwein (Bani Zeid ash Sharqiya) Sinjil Turmus'ayya.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Analysis of the Israeli Supreme Court's Decision in the Settlements Regularization Law Case
    Initial Analysis of the Israeli Supreme Court's Decision in the Settlements Regularization Law Case HCJ 1308/17, Silwad Municipality, et al. v. The Knesset, et. al Issued 15 June 2020 On 9 June 2020, the Israeli Supreme Court decided in an 8 to 1 judgment to cancel the "Settlements Regularization Law for Judea and Samaria [the West Bank]".1 In a ruling spanning 107 pages, the court found that the law violates the rights of Palestinians to property, equality and dignity disproportionately.2 The Knesset passed the controversial law in February 2017. The law provides that the State of Israel could expropriate privately-owned Palestinian land in the occupied West Bank, and to retroactively “regularize” or “legalize” the Israeli settlements built on it. An Addendum to the Law identified 16 settlements to which the law would apply (see Annex at the end of this paper, which also includes a list of the Palestinian villages on which these settlements encroach). According to the court's decision, as of 2016, the scope of Israeli construction on privately-owned Palestinian land in the West Bank amounted to 3,455 structures, of which 1,285 are residential buildings or public institutions.3 The Court’s decision is based on several main legal principles: 1. International law and the non-sovereignty principle applies to the West Bank: The decision stresses that since June 1967, the laws that apply in the West Bank are the laws of "belligerent occupation," supplemented by international human rights law. Further, “the practical implication is that the law of the State of Israel does not apply in the region.”4 1 HCJ 1308/17, Silwad Municipality, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and the Occupied Territories 2014 Human
    ISRAEL 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Israel is a multi-party parliamentary democracy. Although it has no constitution, the parliament, the unicameral 120-member Knesset, has enacted a series of “Basic Laws” that enumerate fundamental rights. Certain fundamental laws, orders, and regulations legally depend on the existence of a “State of Emergency,” which has been in effect since 1948. Under the Basic Laws, the Knesset has the power to dissolve the government and mandate elections. The nationwide Knesset elections in January 2013, considered free and fair, resulted in a coalition government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Security forces reported to civilian authorities. (An annex to this report covers human rights in the occupied territories. This report deals with human rights in Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.) During the year a number of developments affected both the Israeli and Palestinian populations. From July 8 to August 26, Israel conducted a military operation designated as Operation Protective Edge, which according to Israeli officials responded to increases in the number of rockets deliberately fired from Gaza at Israeli civilian areas beginning in late June, as well as militants’ attempts to infiltrate the country through tunnels from Gaza. According to publicly available data, Hamas and other militant groups fired 4,465 rockets and mortar shells into Israel, while the government conducted 5,242 airstrikes within Gaza and a 20-day military ground operation in Gaza. According to the United Nations, the operation killed 2,205 Palestinians. The Israeli government estimated that half of those killed were civilians and half were combatants, according to an analysis of data, while the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs recorded 1,483 civilian deaths--more than two-thirds of those killed--including 521 children and 283 women; 74 persons in Israel were killed, among them 67 combatants, six Israeli civilians, and one Thai civilian.
    [Show full text]
  • Poll No. 73 April 2011 a Public Opinion Poll Conducted By
    Jerusalem Office POBox: 25047 Jerusalem Tel.: +972‐2‐532 83 98 Tel: 02‐2976555 Fax: +972‐2‐581 96 65 Fax: 02‐2976557 Email: info@fespal.org Email: poll@jmcc.org Web: www.fespal.org Website: www.jmcc.org Poll no. 73_April 2011 A public opinion poll conducted by Jerusalem Media & Communications Center * Increase in ratio of Palestinians who oppose military and bombing operations and firing of rockets * A majority of Palestinians support holding local council elections and believe that early elections are a solution to end the internal split * Popularity of political parties and figures remains stable * Around 41% of the Palestinians believe that the local council elections will not be held on the set date (July 9, 2011) The public opinion poll conducted by Jerusalem Media & Communication Center (JMCC) showed an increase in the ratio of Palestinians who oppose military operations as an appropriate response under the current political conditions from 38.1% in January 2009 to 51.8% this April. Accordingly, the ratio of Palestinians who support military operations decreased from 53.3% in January 2009 to 37.1% in April 2011. With regards to the rockets fired from Gaza Strip towards Israel, the ratio of Palestinians who believe they are useful in achieving the national goals went down from 50.8% in January 2009 to 25.4% this month while the ratio of Palestinians who believe that these rockets harm the national interests went up from 20.8% in January 2009 to 38.6% this month. In a similar trend, the ratio of Palestinians who support bombing operations against Israeli civilian targets decreased from 55.4% in January 2009 to 37.3% this April.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Aspects of Climate Change Impacts on Rainfed Agriculture in the Jenin District, Palestine قمصعدي لمأث
    Birzeit University Faculty of Graduate Studies Institute of Environmental and Water Studies Socio-Economic Aspects of Climate Change Impacts on Rainfed Agriculture in the Jenin District, Palestine الجوانب اﻻتجماعية ااﻻقمصعدي لمأثةرات تغةر الانعخ يلى الزراي البعلة في محعفظ تجنةن، فلسطةن M.Sc. Thesis By Yala Ibrahim Aboushi Supervisors Dr. Maher Abu-Madi Dr. Gül Özerol Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Master's Degree in Water and Environmental Science at Birzeit University, Palestine. Birzeit University 2017 I Socio-Economic Aspects of Climate Change Impacts on Rainfed Agriculture in the Jenin District, Palestine الجوانب اﻻتجماعية ااﻻقمصعدي لمأثةرات تغةر الانعخ يلى الزراي البعلة في محعفظ تجنةن، فلسطةن Master’s Thesis Submitted By Yala Ibrahim Aboushi (1135285) Supervisors Dr. Maher Abu-Madi & Dr. Gül Özerol This thesis was successfully defended on 15 / 3 /2017 Examining Committee Signature Dr. Maher Abu-Madi …..………….. Supervisor Dr. Gül Özerol …..………….. Co-supervisor Dr. Rashed Al-Sa‘ed …..………….. Member Dr. Ziad Mimi …..………….. Member The findings, interpretations and the conclusions expressed in this study do not necessarily express the views of Birzeit University, the views of the individual members of the M.Sc. Committee or the views of their respective employers. II Dedication Every hard work needs self-effort as well as guidance of people who are very close to our heart. I dedicate my humble effort to gentle souls, to my sweet and loving Father, Mother, husband, mother in law, sisters, and brothers For their affection, love, encouragement, prayers and support in achieving this success and honor. And to my respected teachers III Abstract Agriculture is a crucial sector in Palestine, yet it is vulnerable to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • P. 0. Box 20243, Jerusai Em Proposal to The
    Proposal to the Agency for l nternat iona 1 Devel opmen t for Suppl emenral Funding of the Gaza Stri p and West Bank, Program of the Community Development Foundation Submitted in January 1982 ' -MS. Judl th Oberrneyer, Dirhctor, Local Representative: tr Middle East/North Africa Region Mr. Thomas Neu, Director, + Save the Chi 1 dred &za Strip and West Bank Offices Commun)ky Deve 1opmen t Founda t ion Community Development Foundation '. 54 Wilton Road, Westport, Conn. P. 0. Box 20243, Jerusai em Proposal to the Agency for l nternat ional Oevelopmen t for Supplemental Funding of the Gaza Strip and West Bank Program of the Comnun i ty Oevel opmen t Founda t ion Submitted in January 1982 ' : I- Ms. Judith Obermeyer, Director,. / Local Representatlve: I. I - L Middle East/North Africa Region Mr. Thomas Neu, Olrector, , . Save the Chi 1 dren/ Gaza Strip and West Bank Offices .', j !. Community Oevel opmen t Foundat ion Community Development Foundation . 54 Wilton Road, Westport, Conn, P. 0. Box 20243, Jerusa l em -TABLE OF CONTENTS I. General Introduction A. Project Listing B. Program Objectives C. Budget and Administration D. Revised Logical Framework 11. Proiect Descriptions WB075 El-Bireh Muuicipalfty Sewage Treatment System 15 WB679 Bethlehem Municipality Wholesale/Retail Market 33 WB083 Kawbar Village Council Internal Water Network 44 WB084 Abu Shukheidem Village Council Water Network 44 WBO85 El-Mazra'ah el-Qiblbiya Council Water Network 44 WB086 Ya'bad Municipality Reservoir and Water Lines 5 2 WB087 El-Jeeb Village Council Internal Water Network 58 WB088 Mukhmas Village Council Internal Water Network 63 GS089 Ikhza'ah Village Council Water Tower and Network 68 WB091 Eastern Slopes Region Erosion Control Barriers 72 WB092 Jalameh Water Couunittee Main Line and Network 75 WB093 Arrabeh Municipality Reservoir and Water Lines 79 WB094 Shufah Village Council Well and Internal Network 84 111.
    [Show full text]
  • The Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem
    Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. pmaster@arij.org | http://www.arij.org Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Report on the Israeli Colonization Activities in the West Bank & the Gaza Strip Volume 189 , April 2014 Issue http://www.arij.org Bethlehem Clashes erupted between Palestinians and the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) in Ayda refugee camp, north of Bethlehem city. The IOA fired teargas and stun grenades at Palestinians, causing dozens of suffocation cases. (RB2000 1 April 2014) Clashes erupted between Palestinians and the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) in Ayda refugee camp, north of Bethlehem city. The IOA fired teargas and stun grenades at Palestinians, causing dozens of suffocation cases. During the clashes, the IOA arrested Abdalla Hamad (15 years). (Wattan 2 April 2014) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) raided and searched a number of Palestinian houses in Ad-Dhuheisheh refugee camp, south of Bethlehem city. Two of the targeted houses are owned by: Mohammad Al-‘Ajouri and Ashraf Taisir Al-‘Ajouri. (Al-Quds 3 April 2014) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) stormed Al-Ubidiya town, east of Bethlehem city and stationed near Ben Abed monastery. (RB2000 3 April 2014) Dozens of Palestinians were suffered gas inhalation after the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) fired teargas and stun grenades at Palestinians while they were praying at the northern entrance of Bethlehem city. (Wafa 4 April 2014) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) attacked the weekly non-violent protest against the segregation wall and settlements in Al-Masara village, south of Bethlehem city. (Maannews 4 April 2014) Israeli settlers living in Sde Boaz outpost uprooted 300 grapes trees and demolished a part of an agricultural room in Al-Khader village, west of Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966.
    [Show full text]
  • 23 November 2020
    3 - 23 November 2020 Latest development (outside the reporting period) On 25 November, citing the lack of building permits, the Israeli authorities demolished 11 Palestinian-owned structures in the Massafer Yatta area of southern Hebron. These included homes, livelihood-related structures and water and sanitation facilities, some of which had been previously provided as humanitarian assistance. Twenty-five people were displaced and over 700 were otherwise affected. All but one of the seven communities targeted are located in an area designated closed for military training, and are at risk of a forcible transfer. This report exceptionally covers three weeks; the next issue will be released on 10 December, covering the normal two-week period. During the reporting period (3-23 November), a total of 129 structures were demolished, or seized, due to a lack of Israeli-issued building permits, displacing 100 people and otherwise affecting at least 200. The largest incident took place on 3 November in , where 83 structures were destroyed, displacing 73 people, including 41 children. Thirty more structures were demolished in 12 other Area C communities. The remaining 16 took place in East Jerusalem, where demolitions have resumed after a three-week suspension, following an announcement by the Israeli authorities on 1 October that, due to the pandemic, they would stop the demolition of inhabited residential buildings in the city. More structures have been demolished or seized so far in 2020, than in any complete year since OCHA began systematically documenting this practice in 2009, with the exception of 2016. On 4 November, Israeli forces shot and killed an off-duty member of the Palestinian security forces at a checkpoint south of Nablus city, reportedly after he opened fire at soldiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Report on Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (29 Oct
    Weekly Report On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (29 Oct. – 04 Nov. 2015) Thursday, 05 November 2015 00:00 Israeli forces continue systematic crimes in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) (29 October – 04 November 2015) Israeli forces have escalated the use of excessive force against peaceful protests in the oPt. 8 Palestinian civilians, including 2 children, were killed in the West Bank; one of whom was killed in occupied Jerusalem. 129 Palestinian civilians, including 25 children, were wounded in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Among the wounded were 3 journalists and 9 paramedics. A paramedic sustained shrapnel wounds and the others suffered tear gas inhalation. Israeli forces conducted 91 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank, including 14 ones in Jerusalem. 119 Palestinian civilians, including 35 children and a woman, were arrested. 48 of them, including 14 children, were arrested in occupied Jerusalem. The offices of Menber al-Hurriya Radio and Adwar "Roles" for Social Change Association in Hebron were raided and their contents were confiscated. Israeli forces have continued their efforts to create Jewish majority in occupied East Jerusalem. A house in al-Mukaber Mountain and 3 apartments in a residential building in Beit Hanina neighbourhood were demolished. 10 families were notified to vacate their houses, southeast of Nablus, to be demolished as they are close to "Ahya" settlement. Israeli forces raided houses belonging to families of Palestinians who carried out run-over and stabbing attacks, and threatened to demolish them on grounds of collective punishment. Israeli settlers have escalated their attacks against Palestinian civilians and property and settlement activities have continued in the West Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Al-Bireh Ramallah Salfit
    Biddya Haris Kifl Haris Marda Tall al Khashaba Mas-ha Yasuf Yatma Sarta Dar Abu Basal Iskaka Qabalan Jurish 'Izbat Abu Adam Az Zawiya (Salfit) Talfit Salfit As Sawiya Qusra Majdal Bani Fadil Rafat (Salfit) Khirbet Susa Al Lubban ash Sharqiya Bruqin Farkha Qaryut Jalud Deir Ballut Kafr ad Dik Khirbet Qeis 'Ammuriya Khirbet Sarra Qarawat Bani Zeid (Bani Zeid al Gharb Duma Kafr 'Ein (Bani Zeid al Gharbi)Mazari' an Nubani (Bani Zeid qsh Shar Khirbet al Marajim 'Arura (Bani Zeid qsh Sharqiya) Turmus'ayya Al Lubban al Gharbi 'Abwein (Bani Zeid ash Sharqiya) Bani Zeid Deir as Sudan Sinjil Rantis Jilijliya 'Ajjul An Nabi Salih (Bani Zeid al Gharbi) Al Mughayyir (Ramallah) 'Abud Khirbet Abu Falah Umm Safa Deir Nidham Al Mazra'a ash Sharqiya 'Atara Deir Abu Mash'al Jibiya Kafr Malik 'Ein Samiya Shuqba Kobar Burham Silwad Qibya Beitillu Shabtin Yabrud Jammala Ein Siniya Bir Zeit Budrus Deir 'Ammar Silwad Camp Deir Jarir Abu Shukheidim Jifna Dura al Qar' Abu Qash At Tayba (Ramallah) Deir Qaddis Al Mazra'a al Qibliya Al Jalazun Camp 'Ein Yabrud Ni'lin Kharbatha Bani HarithRas Karkar Surda Al Janiya Al Midya Rammun Bil'in Kafr Ni'ma 'Ein Qiniya Beitin Badiw al Mus'arrajat Deir Ibzi' Deir Dibwan 'Ein 'Arik Saffa Ramallah Beit 'Ur at Tahta Khirbet Kafr Sheiyan Al-Bireh Burqa (Ramallah) Beituniya Al Am'ari Camp Beit Sira Kharbatha al Misbah Beit 'Ur al Fauqa Kafr 'Aqab Mikhmas Beit Liqya At Tira Rafat (Jerusalem) Qalandiya Camp Qalandiya Beit Duqqu Al Judeira Jaba' (Jerusalem) Al Jib Jaba' (Tajammu' Badawi) Beit 'Anan Bir Nabala Beit Ijza Ar Ram & Dahiyat al Bareed Deir al Qilt Kharayib Umm al Lahim QatannaAl Qubeiba Biddu An Nabi Samwil Beit Hanina Hizma Beit Hanina al Balad Beit Surik Beit Iksa Shu'fat 'Anata Shu'fat Camp Al Khan al Ahmar (Tajammu' Badawi) Al 'Isawiya.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Projects in the West Bank and Gaza Strip 2008
    Agricultural Projects in the West Bank and Gaza Strip 2008 APIS Report January ‐ December 2008 1 Agricultural Projects in the West Bank and Gaza Strip 2008 The data for this report was retrieved from Table (i) Activity logged by members during the the Agriculture Project Information System campaign (27 August – 1 December 2008) (APIS), an information sharing and response monitoring tool for the agricultural sector, Type of activity Unit to which relevant non‐governmental Organization Login 302 organizations (NGOs), international Add New Project 56 organizations, community‐based Edit Project Profile 120 organizations, United Nations (UN) Agencies Add/Edit Activity 1262 and donors upload details of their projects and developments, creating a comprehensive picture of agricultural interventions in the West Bank and Gaza Strip (WBGS). This report is designed to assist the sector in developing policy, programmes, and projects. APIS is managed by the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and funded by the Spanish Cooperation (AECID). The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) acts as a technical adviser to the MoA and compiles analytical reports for the agricultural sector based on data uploaded in APIS. It is important to note that the MoA aims to have all agricultural‐related interventions stored in APIS, and uses this information in creating analytical reports for specific subsectors or areas in WBGS. The success of the database relies on its 169 members to enter project data; FAO and MoA launched a three‐month campaign in September 2008 among APIS members to encourage their active uploading of projects implemented in 2008 throughout the WBGS.
    [Show full text]