DOCSLIB.ORG

Baseline Biodiversity Survey for the Tenaja Corridor and Southern Santa Ana Mountains

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baseline Biodiversity Survey for the Tenaja Corridor and Southern Santa Ana Mountains Baseline Biodiversity Survey for the Tenaja Corridor and Southern Santa Ana Mountains Final Report Prepared for: The Nature Conservancy U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WESTERN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH CENTER Baseline Biodiversity Survey for the Tenaja Corridor and Southern Santa Ana Mountains By Robert Fisher1,2 and Kevin Crooks1,3 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WESTERN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH CENTER Final Report Prepared for: The Nature Conservancy 1USGS-Biological Resources Division Department of Biology San Diego State University San Diego, CA 92182-4614 Current Addresses: 2San Diego Field Station USGS Western Ecological Research Center 5745 Kearny Villa Road, Suite M San Diego, CA 92123 3Department of Fishery and Wildlife Biology Colorado State University 115 Wagar Fort Collins, CO 80523 This report should be cited as: Fisher, R. and K. Crooks. 2001. Baseline Biodiversity Survey for the Tenaja Corridor and Southern Santa Ana Mountains. Final Report. USGS. Technical Report. Prepared for The Nature Conservancy. 72 pp. Sacramento, California 2001 i U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, SECRETARY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, or brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information, contact: Center Director Western Ecological Research Center U.S. Geological Survey 3020 State University Modoc Hall 3rd Floor, Room 3006 Sacramento, CA 95819 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................... 6 RESEARCH GOALS ......................................................................................................... 7 BIODIVERSITY SURVEYS ............................................................................................. 7 Herpetofauna Species...................................................................................................... 7 Small Mammals .............................................................................................................. 9 Large Mammals .............................................................................................................. 9 Track Surveys ............................................................................................................... 10 Camera Surveys ............................................................................................................ 11 Birds.............................................................................................................................. 11 Point counts............................................................................................................... 11 Rapid Ornithological Inventories (ROI) ................................................................... 12 Bat Surveys ................................................................................................................... 13 Water Quality/Hydrology/Riparian Sampling .............................................................. 14 Road Transects.............................................................................................................. 16 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................... 17 Description of Tenaja Nodes ........................................................................................ 17 Tenaja Corridor Biodiversity Summary........................................................................ 20 Recommendations......................................................................................................... 22 Summary of Recommendations................................................................................ 24 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................. 24 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 25 APPENDIX....................................................................................................................... 66 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Number of herpetofauna captured in the Tenaja Corridor through pitfall sampling, January 15, 1999 through September 20, 2000 (70 total sample days). .. 22 Table 2. Number of herpetofauna captured in the Santa Margarita Reserve by pitfall sampling, April 1, 1996 through September 1, 2000 (pitfall arrays 1-5: 230 sampling days; pitfall arrays 6-15: 50 sampling days)............................................................. 23 Table 3. Number of herpetofauna captured in Camp Pendleton through pitfall trapping, December 13, 1996 through September 2, 2000 (130 total sampling days)............. 24 Table 4. Number of small mammals captured in the Tenaja Corridor through pitfall sampling, January 15, 1999 through September 20, 2000 (70 total sample days). .. 25 Table 5. Number of small mammals captured in Santa Margarita Reserve through pitfall sampling, April 1, 1996 through September 1, 2000 (pitfall arrays 1-5: 230 sampling days; pitfall arrays 6-15: 50 sampling days)............................................................. 26 Table 6. Number of small mammals captured at Camp Pendleton by pitfall sampling, December 13, 1996 through September 2, 2000 (130 total sampling days)............. 27 Table 7. Mammalian carnivore species detected through baited track station surveys.... 28 Table 8. Mammalian carnivore species detected at camera stations in the Tenaja and Pechanga corridors.................................................................................................... 31 Table 9. Number of birds detected in the Tenaja corridor in Spring 1999 through point count surveys. ........................................................................................................... 33 Table 10. Number of birds detected in the Santa Ana Mountains project area through Spring 2000 point count surveys............................................................................... 34 Table 11. Birds banded through Rapid Ornithological Inventories (ROI) in the Santa Ana Mountains project area.............................................................................................. 35 Table 12. Bat species detected within the Santa Ana Mountains project area during spring and summer 1999, 2000............................................................................................ 36 Table 13. Water quality parameters for sampling stations within Santa Ana Mountains project area................................................................................................................ 37 Table 14. Species detected in Santa Ana project area during amphibian night driving surveys. ..................................................................................................................... 39 Table 15. Species detected in Santa Ana project area during road kill surveys. .............. 40 Table 16. Species detections within the four Tenaja habitat nodes. ................................. 41 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the southern Santa Ana Mountains study area............................... 44 Figure 2. Vegetative map of the southern Santa Ana Mountains study area.................... 45 Figure 3. Vegetative map of the Tenaja Corridor............................................................. 46 Figure 4. Location of herpetofauna pitfall sampling arrays in Santa Ana Mountains study area (see Figure 5 for Tenaja array numbers). .......................................................... 47 Figure 5. Location of herpetofauna pitfall sampling arrays in Tenaja Corridor............... 48 Figure 6. Location of mammalian carnivore baited track transects in Santa Ana Mountains study area. ............................................................................................... 49 Figure 7. Location of mammalian carnivore baited track transects in Tenaja Corridor... 50 Figure 8. Location of remotely-triggered camera stations in Santa Ana Mountains study area............................................................................................................................ 51 Figure 9. Location of remotely-triggered camera stations in Tenaja Corridor................. 52 Figure 10. Location of bird point count stations conducted April-June 2000 in Santa Ana Mountains study area. ............................................................................................... 53 Figure 11. Location of bird point counts stations conducted April-June 2000 in Tenaja Corridor..................................................................................................................... 54 Figure 12. Location of Rapid Ornithological Inventory (ROI) sampling stations in Santa Ana Mountains study area. ....................................................................................... 55 Figure 13. Location of Rapid Ornithological Inventory (ROI) sampling stations in Tenaja Corridor..................................................................................................................... 56 Figure 14. Location of bat sampling stations in Santa Ana Mountains study area........... 57 Figure 15. Location of bat sampling stations in Tenaja Corridor....................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Friday, April 3, 2009
    Welcome back to the 28th Annual Wildflower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wildflowers and native California plants. Things are warming up in southern and central California, but if you head to higher ground or protected canyons an abundance of wildflowers can still be seen. The wildflowers at Anza-Borrego Desert State Park are now decorating Culp Valley and Blair Valley, while the valley floor is still beautiful with ocotillo (Fouquieria splendens), palo verde (Cercidium floridum (Parkinsonia florida)), and a number of different cacti species. As the flowers thaw out at the Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, off HWY 79, many beauties are coming out to enjoy the warmer weather. In the meadows look for Parish’s meadowfoam (Limnanthes gracilis ssp. parishii), false baby stars (Linanthus (Leptosiphon) androsaceus), goldfields (Lasthenia californica), golden rayed pentachaeta (Pentachaeta aurea), mountain violet (Viola purpurea), purple owl’s clover (Castilleja exserta ssp. exserta), tidy tips (Layia platyglossa), California primrose (Camissonia californica), scarlet bugler (Penstemon centranthifolius), slender phlox (Microsteris gracilis), and checker mallow (Sidalcea malviflora). In the light woods discover a profusion of California peony (Paeonia californica) along with summer snow (Linanthus (Leptosiphon) floribundus ssp. glaber), baby blue eyes (Nemophila menziesii), and wallflower (Erysimum capitatum). Along the San Diego coastline, the Torrey Pines State Natural Reserve is still a treat as splendid mariposa lilies (Calochortus splendens) line Beach Trail and sand verbena (Abronia umbellata), ground pink (Linanthus dianthiflorus), California groundsel (Senecio californicus), climbing milkweed (Sarcostemma (Funastrum) cynanchoides), and California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) adorn the Guy Fleming Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Margarita River Trail Preserve Acquisition
    COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation September 6, 2018 SANTA MARGARITA RIVER TRAIL PRESERVE ACQUISITION Project No. 18-015-01 Project Manager: Greg Gauthier RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $9,750,000 to The Wildlands Conservancy for acquisition of approximately 1,390 acres along the Santa Margarita River for conservation and recreation purposes. LOCATION: Santa Margarita River, County of San Diego PROGRAM CATEGORY: Integrated Coastal and Marine Resource Protection EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location, Site Map, and APN Numbers Exhibit 2: Santa Margarita River Trail Preserve Photographs Exhibit 3: Project Letters RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Chapter 5.5 of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes disbursement of an amount not to exceed nine million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($9,750,000) to The Wildlands Conservancy for acquisition of approximately 1,390 acres along the Santa Margarita River, as shown in Exhibit 1, for conservation and recreation purposes. This authorization is subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to disbursement of any funds for acquisition of the property, The Wildlands Conservancy shall submit for the review and approval of the Executive Officer of the Conservancy: a) all relevant acquisition documents, including the appraisal, agreement of purchase and sale, escrow instructions, deeds, and documents of title; b) a baseline conditions report; c) a monitoring and reporting plan; and d) evidence that sufficient funds are available to complete the acquisition. 2. The Wildlands Conservancy shall not pay more than fair market value for the property acquired pursuant to this authorization, as established in an appraisal approved by the Executive Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses
    Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses Regulatory_Issues_Trends.doc CHAPTER 2 BENEFICIAL USES INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USES ..........................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ..1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT .................................................2 BENEFICIAL USE DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL USES ..................................................................................7 BENEFICIAL USES FOR SPECIFIC WATER BODIES ........................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF RARE BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF COLD FRESHWATER HABITAT BENEFICIAL USE ...............................................9 DESIGNATION OF SPAWNING, REPRODUCTION, AND/ OR EARLY DEVELOPMENT (SPWN) BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................................11 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER POLICY ..................................................................................11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE "SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER" POLICY................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Margarita River Watershed Annual Watermaster Report for the 2013-14 Water Year
    SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED ANNUAL WATERMASTER REPORT WATER YEAR 2013-14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FALLBROOK PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT, ET AL. CIVIL NO. 51-CV-1247-GPC-RBB CHARLES W. BINDER WATERMASTER P. 0. BOX 631 FALLBROOK, CA 92088 (760) 728-1028 FAX (760) 728-1990 August 2015 WATERMASTER SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SECTION 1 - SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2 - INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 5 2.1 Background ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Authority .............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Scope .................................................................................................................. 5 SECTION 3 - SURFACE WATER AVAILABILITY AND USE ......................................... 7 3.1 Surface Flow ........................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Surface Water Diversions .................................................................................. 13 3.3 Water Storage ................................................................................................... 13 SECTION 4- SUBSURFACE WATER AVAILABILITY ................................................. 19 4.1 General .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nchrp Program Synthesis 305
    NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH NCHRP PROGRAM SYNTHESIS 305 Interaction Between Roadways and Wildlife Ecology A Synthesis of Highway Practice NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM NCHRP SYNTHESIS 305 Interaction Between Roadways and Wildlife Ecology A Synthesis of Highway Practice CONSULTANT GARY L. EVINK Ecologist Tallahassee, Florida TOPIC PANEL GREGG ERICKSON, California Department of Transportation PAUL GARRETT, Federal Highway Administration MARY E. GRAY, Federal Highway Administration ALEX LEVY, Federal Highway Administration JOEL MARSHIK, Montana Department of Transportation PATRICK MCGOWEN, Western Transportation Institute PAUL J. WAGNER, Washington State Department of Transportation JON WILLIAMS, Transportation Research Board SUBJECT AREAS Energy and Environment, and Safety and Human Performance Research Sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in Cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD — THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES WASHINGTON, D.C. 2002 www.TRB.org NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM NCHRP SYNTHESIS 305 Systematic, well-designed research provides the most effective Project 20-5 FY 2000 (Topic 32-11) approach to the solution of many problems facing highway ad- ISSN 0547-5570 ministrators and engineers. Often, highway problems are of local ISBN 0-309-06923-8 interest and can best be studied by highway departments indi- Library of Congress Control No. 2002111522 vidually or in cooperation with their state universities and others. © 2002 Transportation Research Board However, the accelerating growth of highway transportation de- velops increasingly complex problems of wide interest to high- way authorities. These problems are best studied through a coor- Price $16.00 dinated program of cooperative research. In recognition of these needs, the highway administrators of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation NOTICE Officials initiated in 1962 an objective national highway research program employing modern scientific techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • A Teacher's Guide and Study Kit on the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve for Middle School Students
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 1998 A teacher's guide and study kit on the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve for middle school students Katharine Marie Havert Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Environmental Education Commons Recommended Citation Havert, Katharine Marie, "A teacher's guide and study kit on the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve for middle school students" (1998). Theses Digitization Project. 1399. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1399 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A TEACHER'S GUIDE AND STUDY KIT ON THE SANTA ROSA PLATEAU ECOLOGICAL RESERVE FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts in Education: Environmental Education Option by Katharine Marie Havert June 1998 A TEACHER'S GUIDE AND STUDY KIT ON THE SANTA ROSA PLATEAU ECOLOGICAL RESERVE FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino Katharine Marie Havert June 1998 Approved by: Darleen Stoner, Ph.D., Date First Reader Ujf Bonnie Trusler, M.A., San Bernardino Date City Unified School District, Second Reader ABSTRACT The need for a study kit with activity-based lessons for before, during, and after a visit to the Santa Rosa Piateau Ecological Reserve is the basis for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivore Survey Report 2009
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Carnivore Survey Report 2009 23 April 2010 Carnivore Survey Report 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................2 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................3 TRANSECT SURVEYS..........................................................................................................................3 SURVEY DESIGN ..................................................................................................................6 FIELD PROCEDURE...............................................................................................................6 DATA ANALYSIS..................................................................................................................7 CAMERA STATIONS............................................................................................................................8 HABITAT LINKAGE SURVEYS...........................................................................................................11 INCIDENTAL OBSERVATIONS ...........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Recovering California Steelhead South of Santa Cruz
    THE OSPREY • ISSUE NO. 75 MAY 2013 15 Recovering California Steelhead South of Santa Cruz By Kurt Zimmerman, Tim Frahm and Sam Davidson — California Trout, Trout Unlimited — Kurt Zimmerman is Southern Steelhead genetics evince unique documents, intended to help achieve California Regional Manager for characteristics region-by-region (and recovery goals by describing strate - California Trout. Tim Frahm and Sam even watershed-by-watershed), as the gies and recommended actions likely Davidson are California Central Coast fish adapted to the particular condi - required to restore viable wild popula - Steelhead Coordinator and California tions and climate factors of coastal tions. Communications Manager for Trout streams from the Baja Peninsula to In early 2012, after years of public Unlimited. Visit their web sites at: Alaska. Today, steelhead south of San and agency input, NMFS released the www.caltrout.org Mateo County in California are catego - Final Southern California Recovery www.tucalifornia.org rized by the National Marine Fisheries Plan for the SCC steelhead. Later that Service (NMFS) into two “Distinct year, the agency released for public any anglers consider Population Segments” (DPS): the comment a Review Draft of the the steelhead trout (O. “South Central California Coastal” Recovery Plan for the South Central mykiss) the “perfect Coastal steelhead. These two Recovery fish.” Steelhead are Plans identify area-wide threats as widely revered for well as threats specific to particular Mtheir power and grace in the water, and watersheds. Common threats are the Steelhead have for the high challenge of actually three “Ds”: Dams, Diversions and catching one. Sport fishing for steel - declined across much Diminished Aquatic and Riparian head is a major contributor to many Habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Collections
    A. andersonii A. Gray SANTA CRUZ MANZANITA San Mateo Along Skyline Blvd. between Gulch Road and la Honda Rd. (A. regismontana?) Santa Cruz Along Empire Grade, about 2 miles north of its intersection with Alba Grade. Lat. N. 37° 07', Long. 122° 10' W. Altitude about 2550 feet. Santa Cruz Aong grade (summit) 0.8 mi nw Alba Road junction (2600 ft elev. above and nw of Ben Lomond (town)) - Empire Grade Santa Cruz Near Summit of Opal Creek Rd., Big Basin Redwood State Park. Santa Cruz Near intersection of Empire Grade and Alba Grade. ben Lomond Mountain. Santa Cruz Along China Grade, 0.2 miles NW of its intersection with the Big Basin-Saratoga Summit Rd. Santa Cruz Nisene Marks State Park, Aptos Creek watershed; under PG&E high-voltage transmission line on eastern rim of the creek canyon Santa Cruz Along Redwood Drive 1.5 miles up (north of) from Monte Toyon Santa Cruz Miller's Ranch, summit between Gilroy and Watsonville. Santa Cruz At junction of Alba Road and Empire Road Ben Lomond Ridge summit Santa Cruz Sandy ridges near Bonny Doon - Santa Cruz Mountains Santa Cruz 3 miles NW of Santa Cruz, on upper UC Santa Cruz campus, Marshall Fields Santa Cruz Mt. Madonna Road along summit of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Between Lands End and Manzanitas School. Lat. N. 37° 02', Long. 121° 45' W; elev. 2000 feet Monterey Moro Road, Prunedale (A. pajaroensis?) A. auriculata Eastw. MT. DIABLO MANZANITA Contra Costa Between two major cuts of Cowell Cement Company (w face of ridge) - Mount Diablo, Lime Ridge Contra Costa Immediately south of Nortonville; 37°57'N, 121°53'W Contra Costa Top Pine Canyon Ridge (s-facing slope between the two forks) - Mount Diablo, Emmons Canyon (off Stone Valley) Contra Costa Near fire trail which runs s from large spur (on meridian) heading into Sycamore Canyon - Mount Diablo, Inner Black Hills Contra Costa Off Summit Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Resources and Groundwater Quality
    Chapter 7: Groundwater Resources and Groundwater Quality Chapter 7 1 Groundwater Resources and 2 Groundwater Quality 3 7.1 Introduction 4 This chapter describes groundwater resources and groundwater quality in the 5 Study Area, and potential changes that could occur as a result of implementing the 6 alternatives evaluated in this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 7 Implementation of the alternatives could affect groundwater resources through 8 potential changes in operation of the Central Valley Project (CVP) and State 9 Water Project (SWP) and ecosystem restoration. 10 7.2 Regulatory Environment and Compliance 11 Requirements 12 Potential actions that could be implemented under the alternatives evaluated in 13 this EIS could affect groundwater resources in the areas along the rivers impacted 14 by changes in the operations of CVP or SWP reservoirs and in the vicinity of and 15 lands served by CVP and SWP water supplies. Groundwater basins that may be 16 affected by implementation of the alternatives are in the Trinity River Region, 17 Central Valley Region, San Francisco Bay Area Region, Central Coast Region, 18 and Southern California Region. 19 Actions located on public agency lands or implemented, funded, or approved by 20 Federal and state agencies would need to be compliant with appropriate Federal 21 and state agency policies and regulations, as summarized in Chapter 4, Approach 22 to Environmental Analyses. 23 Several of the state policies and regulations described in Chapter 4 have resulted 24 in specific institutional and operational conditions in California groundwater 25 basins, including the basin adjudication process, California Statewide 26 Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Program (CASGEM), California Sustainable 27 Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), and local groundwater management 28 ordinances, as summarized below.
    [Show full text]
  • California Floras, Manuals, and Checklists: a Bibliography
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 2019 California Floras, Manuals, and Checklists: A Bibliography James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "California Floras, Manuals, and Checklists: A Bibliography" (2019). Botanical Studies. 70. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/70 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA FLORAS, MANUALS, AND CHECKLISTS Literature on the Identification and Uses of California Vascular Plants Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 21st Edition – 14 November 2019 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Introduction . 1 1: North American & U. S. Regional Floras. 2 2: California Statewide Floras . 4 3: California Regional Floras . 6 Northern California Sierra Nevada & Eastern California San Francisco Bay, & Central Coast Central Valley & Central California Southern California 4: National Parks, Forests, Monuments, Etc.. 15 5: State Parks and Other Sites . 23 6: County and Local Floras . 27 7: Selected Subjects. 56 Endemic Plants Rare and Endangered Plants Extinct Aquatic Plants & Vernal Pools Cacti Carnivorous Plants Conifers Ferns & Fern Allies Flowering Trees & Shrubs Grasses Orchids Ornamentals Weeds Medicinal Plants Poisonous Plants Useful Plants & Ethnobotanical Studies Wild Edible Plants 8: Sources .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SETTLEMENT and RELEASE AGREEMENT This Settlement And
    SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT This Settlement and Release Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into on October ___,26 2020 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the City of Temecula and City of Temecula City Council (the “City”); Ambient Communities, LLC and Temecula West Village, LLC (together referred to as “TWV”); Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Mountain Lion Foundation, and The Cougar Connection (collectively referred to as “CBD”); and Endangered Habitats League (“EHL”) (all referred to collectively as the “Parties” and, individually, a “Party”). RECITALS This Agreement is made with reference to, and in consideration of, the following facts and representations, which the Parties agree are true and correct: A. On December 12, 2017, the City Council of the City certified a final Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) and approved other project entitlements (the “Approvals”) for the Altair Specific Plan (the “Project”). A map depicting the Project as approved is attached for reference purposes as Exhibit A. B. On January 11, 2018, CBD filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive Relief alleging that Respondent City violated the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and California planning and zoning laws in approving the EIR and the Approvals for the Project (the “CBD Petition”) in the action styled Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. City of Temecula, et al. (Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC1800858) (the “CBD Action”). On January 10, 2019, CBD filed a First Amended and Supplemental Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive Relief (the “Amended CBD Petition”), which added a claim alleging that the City had violated its duty to retain certain records.
    [Show full text]