DOCSLIB.ORG

It Is Extremely Difficult to Induce Penguins to Drink Warm Water

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
It Is Extremely Difficult to Induce Penguins to Drink Warm Water It is extremely difficult to induce penguins to drink warm water. John Coleman Subject: Joan Sola, The cosmological constant and entropy problems, arXiv:1505.05863v1 [gr-qc], p. 2: "Truly bewildering, if formulated on these grounds!" Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 18:03:36 +0300 Message-ID: <CAM7Ekxn6i7YfV_Kq1TUKJVGOop5Vxo5b778DVeTHPFRgcShCEA@mail.gmail.com> From: Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]> To: Joan <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected], Norbert Straumann <[email protected]>, Ruth Durrer <[email protected]>, Mike <[email protected]>, George F Smoot III <[email protected]>, Anthony Leggett <[email protected]>, Anthony Zee <[email protected]>, George Efstathiou <[email protected]>, Jeremiah P Ostriker <[email protected]>, Don Page <[email protected]>, Frank Tipler <[email protected]>, George <[email protected]>, Robert van den Hoogen <[email protected]>, Craig Copi <[email protected]>, Klaas Landsman <[email protected]>, Hans Ohanian <[email protected]>, Naresh Dadhich <[email protected]>, Paddy <[email protected]>, Tejinder Singh <[email protected]>, Peter Jenni <[email protected]>, Pankaj S Joshi <[email protected]>, David J Miller <[email protected]>, Henk van Elst <[email protected]>, Chris Van Den Broeck <[email protected]> As Ivo van Vulpen remarked, "Why is the universe larger than a football?" Check out pp. 24-25 in http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/horizon.pdf The solution is from Plato, some twenty-five centuries ago. No need to invent the wheel. D. Chakalov ======================================================================================== Subject: Quentin G. Bailey, What do we know about Lorentz Symmetry? arXiv:1505.05975v1 [gr-qc], Sec. 2. Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 13:45:07 +0000 Message-ID: <CAM7EkxnCb9XdwZnBJPBkPjwqRx9H3ErnLtv23+b=GHvSqrNjkw@mail.gmail.com> From: Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]> To: Quentin G Bailey <[email protected]> Cc: John Moffat <[email protected]>, Florian Beyer <[email protected]>, Leon Escobar <[email protected]>, Yuri Bonder <[email protected]>, Jörg Frauendiener <[email protected]>, Laszlo Szabados <[email protected]>, Paul Tod <[email protected]>, Adam Helfer <[email protected]> Dear Dr. Bailey: Thank you for your very valuable paper. Perhaps you will be interested to see pp. 24-25 in http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/horizon.pdf There is no violation of Lorentz Symmetry. There is no need for "asymptotically de Sitter space-times" (L. Szabados and P. Tod, in preparation) and other parapsychology either. Kind regards, D. Chakalov chakalov.net ======================================================================================== Subject: Re: Red herrings by Jorge Pullin, arXiv:1505.02089v1 [gr-qc] Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 11:24:35 +0300 Message-ID: <CAM7Ekxk2A-nbopZ+WSKDCeShy9G0hRXAkECCUg2ag0YW6prZvw@mail.gmail.com> From: Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]> To: Feldwebel Hans Georg Schultz <[email protected]>, Karel V Kuchar <[email protected]>, Chris Isham <[email protected]>, Charles Torre <[email protected]>, Stanley Deser <[email protected]>, Robert M Wald <[email protected]>, Robert Geroch <[email protected]>, Charles W Misner <[email protected]>, Jim Isenberg <[email protected]>, Malcolm MacCallum <[email protected]>, Abhay Ashtekar <[email protected]>, Rodolfo Gambini <[email protected]>, Ulrich Sperhake <[email protected]>, Javier Olmedo <[email protected]>, Jose M M Senovilla <[email protected]>, Alan Rendall <[email protected]>, Helmut Friedrich <[email protected]>, Lars Andersson <[email protected]>, Richard Woodard <[email protected]>, Andrew Waldron <[email protected]>, Steven Carlip <[email protected]>, John Baez <[email protected]>, Bahram Mashhoon <[email protected]>, Matt Visser <[email protected]>, Paul Davies <[email protected]>, Kip <[email protected]>, Dorje Brody <[email protected]>, Andreas <[email protected]>, Cecilia Flori <[email protected]>, Laszlo Szabados <[email protected]>, Adam Helfer <[email protected]>, Jörg Frauendiener <[email protected]>, Greg Galloway <[email protected]>, Xiao Zhang <[email protected]>, David Albert <[email protected]>, IGUS Jim <[email protected]>, Daniel Kennefick <[email protected]>, Jirí Bicák <[email protected]>, Warren Johnson <[email protected]>, Gabriela González <[email protected]>, Alessandra Buonanno <[email protected]>, Hermann Nicolai <[email protected]>, Sean Carroll <[email protected]>, Carlo Rovelli <[email protected]>, Alejandro Perez <[email protected]>, Daniele Oriti <[email protected]>, Claus Kiefer <[email protected]>, Domenico Giulini <[email protected]>, Baron Rees of Ludlow <[email protected]>, Luciano Rezzolla <[email protected]>, Templeton Foundation <[email protected]> Cc: Sean Hayward <[email protected]>, Hans Ringström <[email protected]>, Gary Horowitz <[email protected]>, Gabor Etesi <[email protected]>, Robert E Gompf <[email protected]>, András <[email protected]>, Ed Witten <[email protected]>, Steven Weinberg <[email protected]>, Sergiu Klainerman <[email protected]>, Demetrios Christodoulou <[email protected]>, Merced Montesinos Velásquez <[email protected]>, Jean-Pierre Derendinger <[email protected]>, Michael Eichmair <[email protected]>, Wei-Tou Ni <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], JoAnne Hewett <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Kerstin Borras <[email protected]>, Halina Abramowicz <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Fabiola Gianotti <[email protected]>, [email protected], Ignatios Antoniadis <[email protected]>, Peter Jenni <[email protected]>, John Ellis <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Susanne Reffert <[email protected]>, [email protected], Georgi Dvali <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], James Gillies <[email protected]>, Carla Cederbaum <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Yongge Ma <[email protected]>, Sijie Gao <[email protected]>, Eduardo Guendelman <[email protected]> P.S. Check out the note on p. 24 (attached) in http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/horizon.pdf (May 12, 2015, 10:36 GMT) D.C. On Mon, 11 May 2015 15:12:41 +0300, Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]> wrote: [snip] ======================================================================================== Subject: Statistics of red herring radiance and the red herring area spectrum Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 11:56:12 +0300 Message-ID: <CAM7EkxmuJTNV4NOQW2pguakqoiASKi6M5tSHKt0tzma_hDxLzQ@mail.gmail.com> From: Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]> To: Jacob Bekenstein <[email protected]> Cc: Grisha Volovik <[email protected]>, Matt Visser <[email protected]>, William G Unruh <[email protected]>, Jeff Steinhauer <[email protected]>, Gil Jannes <[email protected]>, Sean Weinberg <[email protected]>, Peng Wang <[email protected]>, Gerardus <[email protected]>, John Ellis <[email protected]>, John M Lee <[email protected]>, Steven Weinberg <[email protected]> Jacob D. Bekenstein, arXiv:1505.03253v1 [gr-qc] , p. 2: "The question we focus on is whether any insight into quantum gravity can be had from such investigation." -- Of course not, http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/horizon.pdf D. Chakalov ======================================================================================== Subject: The "goddamn particle" Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 03:38:58 +0300 Message-ID: <CAM7EkxmR9ntwhp7z7Kmjf56HB1ODEih-zihXwkdYzU+dDBaa0A@mail.gmail.com> From: Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]> To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear colleagues, Check out pp. 24-25 in http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/horizon.pdf The fun is just around the corner! Sincerely, D. Chakalov ======================================================================================== Subject: Re: The proof of the (Higgs) pudding Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:40:23 +0300 Message-ID: <CAM7Ekx=rOa86uwqDYd90K5mwu1PtrMzs5KkbfN015Ab8yFhRbg@mail.gmail.com> From: Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]> To: David J Miller <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected],
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Search for Lorentz-Boosted Higgs Bosons Decaying to Charm Quarks in the CMS Experiment Using Deep Neural Networks
    University of California Santa Barbara A search for Lorentz-boosted Higgs bosons decaying to charm quarks in the CMS experiment using deep neural networks A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Physics by Huilin Qu CERN-THESIS-2019-165 Committee in charge: Professor Joseph Incandela, Chair Associate Professor Nathaniel Craig Professor Jeffrey Richman September 2019 The Dissertation of Huilin Qu is approved. Associate Professor Nathaniel Craig Professor Jeffrey Richman Professor Joseph Incandela, Committee Chair September 2019 A search for Lorentz-boosted Higgs bosons decaying to charm quarks in the CMS experiment using deep neural networks Copyright © 2019 by Huilin Qu iii Acknowledgements The pursuit of my Ph.D. in particle physics is a long journey with many ups and downs. I am grateful to so many people who showed up along this way, influenced me greatly with their knowledge and character, and provided me with invaluable help and support. I apologize I cannot name every one of them here – the list is too long. But I have my sincere gratitude to all of them deep in my heart. First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my research advisor, Prof. Joseph Incandela, for being always so supportive and inspiring, for allowing a lot of freedom in my research, and for providing me with countless valuable suggestions not only about my research but also on how to grow as a scientist. Talking with him is like magic – his words are so inspiring, and can always clear up my doubts and leave me motivated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reduction Problem for Einstein's Equations I
    168 THE REDUCTION PROBLEM FOR EINSTEIN'S EQUATIONS Vincent Moncrief I. MOTIVATION h has long been known that the vacuum (or electro-vacuum) Einstein equations for spacetimes admitting a single (spacelike) Killing field can be locally reexpressed as a 2 + 1 dimensional system of Einstein-harmonic­ map equations [1, 2] . In this formulation the unknown fields are (in the vacuum case) a Lorentzian metric on the (locally defined) space of orbits of the Killing field and the norm and twist potential of this Killing field which define a harmonic map from the space of orbits to hyperbolic two-space. A natural problem is to study this formulation globally on suitably chosen manifolds and to apply standard methods of elliptic to reduce the system to its "minimal form". In physics terminology one would like to solve an elliptic set of equations for all the dependent or "non-propagating" variables and be left with an unconstrained hyperbolic system for only the independent "physical degrees of freedom" of the gravitational field. One mathematical motivation for this reduction program is that it aims to take maximal advantage of the elliptic aspects of Einstein's equations, for which the needed global analysis techniques are already at hand, and to reduce the complementary (and presumably more difficult) hyperbolic aspects of the system as much as possible. The ultimate aim of this project is to study the long time existence properties of Einstein's equations and the hope is that the reduction program should help to make such an analysis more tractable. 169 Another more "practical" motivation for this program is that it suggests a numerical method for approximately solving the Einstein equations which avoids the notorious problem of the "drifting of the constraints".
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Gravitational Wave Science: 100 Years of Development of Mathematical Theory, Detectors, Numerical Algorithms, and Data Analysis Tools
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 53, Number 4, October 2016, Pages 513–554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/bull/1544 Article electronically published on August 2, 2016 THE EMERGENCE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE SCIENCE: 100 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICAL THEORY, DETECTORS, NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, AND DATA ANALYSIS TOOLS MICHAEL HOLST, OLIVIER SARBACH, MANUEL TIGLIO, AND MICHELE VALLISNERI In memory of Sergio Dain Abstract. On September 14, 2015, the newly upgraded Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) recorded a loud gravitational-wave (GW) signal, emitted a billion light-years away by a coalescing binary of two stellar-mass black holes. The detection was announced in February 2016, in time for the hundredth anniversary of Einstein’s prediction of GWs within the theory of general relativity (GR). The signal represents the first direct detec- tion of GWs, the first observation of a black-hole binary, and the first test of GR in its strong-field, high-velocity, nonlinear regime. In the remainder of its first observing run, LIGO observed two more signals from black-hole bina- ries, one moderately loud, another at the boundary of statistical significance. The detections mark the end of a decades-long quest and the beginning of GW astronomy: finally, we are able to probe the unseen, electromagnetically dark Universe by listening to it. In this article, we present a short historical overview of GW science: this young discipline combines GR, arguably the crowning achievement of classical physics, with record-setting, ultra-low-noise laser interferometry, and with some of the most powerful developments in the theory of differential geometry, partial differential equations, high-performance computation, numerical analysis, signal processing, statistical inference, and data science.
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing to the Tempo of LEP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS CERN COURIER VOLUME 40 NUMBER 10 DECEMBER 2000 Dancing to the tempo of LEP SPIN SUPERSYMMETRY INTERNET Polarized protons accelerated Striking suggestions for How the Web was Born, a new in new RHIC ring p8 additional physics symmetry pl7 book p43 E RI Hew Gêner CES Creative Electronic Systems 70 route du Hunt-dun*! CH-1213 Petit-Uncy, Switzerland Internet: nttp://www.ces.cft I The Ultimate VME Machine CES Switzeriand The RI03 features a twin bus architecture, a Tel: ^41.22.879.51.00 ifque fnter-processor communication mechanism Fax: +4U2.792.57.4d Email; [email protected] for ultra-high-speed data acquisitions g and user-level load balance control CES.O Germany with dedicated hardware. Tel: +49.60.51.96.97.41 Fax; +49.60,51.96.97.33 Sheer Speed: Êttuiil: [email protected] # • VME - block transfers in 2eSST at CES MSâ 300 MBytes/s, single cycles at 20 MBytes/s Tel:+ 1.518.843.1445 Fax;+1.518.643.1447 * Memory - 400 MBytes/s average, Email: [email protected] 800 MBytes/s peak • Multi-Access - VME + PCM + PCI 2 + CPU without global degradation CPU Power: PowerPC 750 or 7400 at maximum available speed I Flexible: Two Independent 64-bit PCI with simultaneous access to the memory I Scalable: Up to four additional PMC's on a PMC carrier system MFCC 844x PMC PROCESSORS • 130 KGates user-FPGA • Continuous acquisition at 50 MBytes/s In 32 or 64~bit mode • Full 750 / 7400 computing core • Full network services on PCI * Complete multi-processing software with connection oriented high-speed data transfers SOFTWARE SUPPORT VxWorics®, Lynxob®, muecat® and LINUX® development software including support for hard real-time target machines.
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Materiality Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations
    Language and Materiality Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations Edited by Jillian R. Cavanaugh CUNY, New York Shalini Shankar Northwestern University University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia 4843/24, 2nd Floor, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi - 110002, India 79 Anson Road, #06-04/06, Singapore 079906 Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107180949 DOI: 10.1017/9781316848418 C Cambridge University Press 2017 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2017 Printed in <country> by <printer> A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISBN 978-1-107-18094-9 Hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. 4 Fontroversy! Or, How to Care about the Shape of Language Keith M. Murphy Introduction On July 4, 2012, standing in the well of a packed lecture hall on the cam- pus of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), just outside Geneva, particle physicist Joseph Incandela looked up at the hall’s projection screen and, with only a hint of nerves in his voice, uttered the following pro- nouncement: “If we combine the ZZ and gamma-gamma, this is what we get.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GLOBAL EXISTENCE PROBLEM in GENERAL RELATIVITY 3 Played a Vital Role As Motivation and Guide in the Development of the Results Discussed Here
    THE GLOBAL EXISTENCE PROBLEM IN GENERAL RELATIVITY LARS ANDERSSON1 Abstract. We survey some known facts and open questions concerning the global properties of 3+1 dimensional spacetimes containing a com- pact Cauchy surface. We consider spacetimes with an ℓ–dimensional Lie algebra of space–like Killing fields. For each ℓ ≤ 3, we give some basic results and conjectures on global existence and cosmic censorship. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. The Einstein equations 3 3. Bianchi 15 4. G2 23 5. U(1) 30 6. 3+1 34 7. Concluding remarks 39 Appendix A. Basic Causality concepts 40 References 41 1. Introduction arXiv:gr-qc/9911032v4 28 Apr 2006 In this review, we will describe some results and conjectures about the global structure of solutions to the Einstein equations in 3+1 dimensions. We consider spacetimes (M,¯ g¯) with an ℓ–dimensional Lie algebra of space– like Killing fields. We may say that such spacetimes have a (local) isometry group G of dimension ℓ with the action of G generated by space–like Killing fields. For each value ℓ 3 of the dimension of the isometry group, we state the reduced field equations≤ as well as attempt to give an overview of the most important results and conjectures. We will concentrate on the vacuum case. In section 2, we present the Einstein equations and give the 3+1 decom- position into constraint and evolution equations, cf. subsection 2.2. Due to Date: June 27, 2004. 1Supported in part by the Swedish Natural Sciences Research Council, contract no. F-FU 4873-307, and the NSF under contract no.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Faculty Research Lecture Flyer
    THE 61ST ANNUAL FACULTY RESEARCH LECTURE Joseph Incandela Searching for the Genetic Code of our Universe Monday, October 17, 2016 / FREE 4:00 PM Reception/ 5:00 PM Lecture Corwin Pavilion University Center The 2012 discovery of the Higgs boson at the CERN LHC accelerator complex completes a powerful and comprehensive description of nature known as the standard model of particle physics. The next step is to find the new physics that underpins this model, which many physicists believe could solve mysteries first seen in astrophysical and cosmological data, such as dark matter and neutrino mixing. Professor Incandela will give a general overview of where things stand and what's being planned, including his own research plans to address these very fundamental questions about the universe. Joseph Incandela received his PhD from the University of Chicago under Professor Henry Frisch in 1986 for a search for magnetic monopoles using superconducting coils whose currents were measured by Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices. Awarded a CERN Fellowship in 1987, he joined the UA2 experiment at CERN and was a leading contributor to the first precision measurement of the mass of the Z boson. He then proposed and led the first search at a hadron collider for a Higgs boson using hadronic tau decay final states. He joined the CDF experiment as a Wilson Fellow at Fermilab in 1991 where he led silicon detector projects and also led the search for top quarks that provided the most significant contribution to the discovery of the top quark in 1995. With regard to the LHC, he created the US CMS Silicon tracker project in 1997 that eventually constructed and tested ~60% (by area) of the silicon strip tracking system.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantization, Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations,And Operator
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/pspum/059 Other Titles in This Series 59 William Arveson, Thomas Branson, and Irving Segal, editors, Quantization, nonlinear partial differential equations, and operator algebra (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, June 1994) 58 Bill Jacob and Alex Rosenberg, editors, K-theory and algebraic geometry: Connections with quadratic forms and division algebras (University of California, Santa Barbara, July 1992) 57 Michael C. Cranston and Mark A. Pinsky, editors, Stochastic analysis (Cornell University, Ithaca, July 1993) 56 William J. Haboush and Brian J. Parshall, editors, Algebraic groups and their generalizations (Pennsylvania State University, University Park, July 1991) 55 Uwe Jannsen, Steven L. Kleiman, and Jean-Pierre Serre, editors, Motives (University of Washington, Seattle, July/August 1991) 54 Robert Greene and S. T. Yau, editors, Differential geometry (University of California, Los Angeles, July 1990) 53 James A. Carlson, C. Herbert Clemens, and David R. Morrison, editors, Complex geometry and Lie theory (Sundance, Utah, May 1989) 52 Eric Bedford, John P. D'Angelo, Robert E. Greene, and Steven G. Krantz, editors, Several complex variables and complex geometry (University of California, Santa Cruz, July 1989) 51 William B. Arveson and Ronald G. Douglas, editors, Operator theory/operator algebras and applications (University of New Hampshire, July 1988) 50 James Glimm, John Impagliazzo, and Isadore Singer, editors, The legacy of John von Neumann (Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, May/June 1988) 49 Robert C. Gunning and Leon Ehrenpreis, editors, Theta functions - Bowdoin 1987 (Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine, July 1987) 48 R. O. Wells, Jr., editor, The mathematical heritage of Hermann Weyl (Duke University, Durham, May 1987) 47 Paul Fong, editor, The Arcata conference on representations of finite groups (Humboldt State University, Arcata, California, July 1986) 46 Spencer J.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1901.02380V1 [Math-Ph]
    A Euclidean Signature Semi-Classical Program Antonella Marini Department of Mathematics, Yeshiva University, 500 West 185th Street, New York, NY 10033, USA. and Department of Mathematics, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67010 L’Aquila, AQ ITALY. E-mail address: [email protected] Rachel Maitra Department of Applied Mathematics, Wentworth Institute of Technology, 550 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5998, USA. E-mail address: [email protected] Vincent Moncrief Department of Physics and Department of Mathematics, Yale University, P.O. Box 208120, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. E-mail address: [email protected] arXiv:1901.02380v1 [math-ph] 8 Jan 2019 In this article we discuss our ongoing program to extend the scope of certain, well- developed microlocal methods for the asymptotic solution of Schr¨odinger’s equation (for suitable ‘nonlinear oscillatory’ quantum mechanical systems) to the treatment of several physically significant, interacting quantum field theories. Our main focus is on applying these ‘Euclidean-signature semi-classical’ methods to self-interacting (real) scalar fields of renormalizable type in 2, 3 and 4 spacetime dimensions and to Yang-Mills fields in 3 and 4 spacetime dimensions. A central argument in favor of our program is that the asymptotic methods for Schr¨odinger operators developed in the microlocal literature are far superior, for the quantum mechanical systems to 2 which they naturally apply, to the conventional WKB methods of the physics litera- ture and that these methods can be modified, by techniques drawn from the calculus of variations and the analysis of elliptic boundary value problems, to apply to cer- tain (bosonic) quantum field theories.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS ADVISORY PANEL to the U.S. DEPARTMENT of ENERGY and NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
    HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS ADVISORY PANEL to the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES Hilton Washington DC North/Gaithersburg 620 Perry Parkway Gaithersburg, MD 20877 May 14-15, 2018 HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS ADVISORY PANEL 2 SUMMARY OF MEETING The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and National Science Foundation (NSF) High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) was convened at 8:48 a.m. ET on May14-15, 2018, at the Hilton Washington DC North/Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, MD, by Panel Chair Andrew Lankford. The meeting was open to the public and conducted in accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) requirements. Attendees can visit http://science.energy.gov/hep/hepap for more information about HEPAP. Panel members present: JoAnne Hewett, Chair Kent Irwin Christopher Stubbs Janet Conrad Kay Kinoshita Michael Syphers Kyle Cranmer David Larbalestier Mark Trodden Rohini Godbole Donatella Lucchesi James Wells Jordan Goodman Fulvia Pilat Geralyn Zeller Salman Habib Thomas Roser Joseph Incandela Maria Spiropulu HEPAP Designated Federal Officer: John Boger, DOE, Office of Science (SC), Office of High Energy Physics (HEP), Research Technology, Detector Research & Development (R&D), Director Others present for all or part of the meeting: David Asner, Brookhaven National Michael Cooke, DOE Laboratory (BNL) Jean Cottam, NSF Tali Bar-Shalom, Office of Management and Glen Crawford, DOE Budget Patricia Crumley, DOE Rich Barvainis, NSF Paul Dabbar, DOE Lothar Bauerdick, Fermi National Kyle Dawson, University of Utah Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) Marcel Demarteau, Argonne National Doug Benjamin, Duke University Laboratory (ANL) Steve Binkley, DOE Richard Dubois, National Aeronautics and Kevin Black, Boston University Space Administration (NASA) Ken Bloom, University of Nebraska Allison Eckhardt, DOE Greg Bock, Fermilab James Fast, PNNL Joel Butler, Fermilab Laura Fields, Fermilab C.
    [Show full text]
  • Building for Discovery: Strategic Plan for U.S. Particle Physics in the Global Context Vi
    Building for Discovery Strategic Plan for U.S. Particle Physics in the Global Context Report of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel (P5) May 2014 Report of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel i Preface Panel reports usually convey their results logically and dispas- to our community, to those who charged us, and to scientists sionately, with no mention of the emotional, soul-searching in other fields. Our community’s passion, dedication, and entre- processes behind them. We would like to break with tradition preneurial spirit have been inspirational. Therefore, to our to share some behind-the-scenes aspects and perspectives. colleagues across our country and around the world, we say a heartfelt thank you. Every request we made received a thought- This is a challenging time for particle physics. The science is ful response, even when the requests were substantial and the deeply exciting and its endeavors have been extremely suc- schedules tight. A large number of you submitted inputs to cessful, yet funding in the U.S. is declining in real terms. This the public portal, which we very much appreciated. report offers important opportunities for U.S. investment in science, prioritized under the tightly constrained budget sce- In our deliberations, no topic or option was off the table. Every narios in the Charge. We had the responsibility to make the alternative we could imagine was considered. We worked by tough choices for a world-class program under each of these consensus—even when just one or two individuals voiced con- scenarios, which we have done. At the same time, we felt the cerns, we worked through the issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinism and General Relativity
    Determinism and General Relativity Chris Smeenk and Christian W¨uthrich∗ 16 September 2020 Abstract We investigate the fate of determinism in general relativity (GR), comparing the philosopher's account with the physicist's well-posed initial value formulations. The fate of determinism is interwoven with the question of what it is for a spacetime to be `physically reasonable'. A central concern is the status of global hyperbolicity, a putatively necessary condition for determinism in GR. While global hyperbolicity may fail to be true of all physically reasonable models, we analyze whether global hyperbolicity should be (i) imposed by fiat; (ii) established from weaker assumptions, as in cosmic censorship theorems; or (iii) justified by beyond-GR physics. 1 Introduction Two foundational questions one might ask about any physical theory bring out particularly subtle and interesting features of general relativity (GR). First, is GR a deterministic theory? Second, do all mathematical models of the theory represent physically possible spacetimes? There is a tight connection in GR between these two questions, i.e., between an assessment of what spacetimes are physically possible or reasonable and of whether determinism holds. It is this connection that we explore in this essay. Determinism holds if specifying the state of a system uniquely fixes its dynamical evolution. Spacetimes with exotic causal structure raise a distinctive set of questions regarding the status of determinism in GR, differing from those raised by the (in)famous hole argument. Below we will bypass the hole argument by assuming that the existence of a unique solution `up to diffeomor- phism invariance' is sufficient for determinism in GR.
    [Show full text]