DOCSLIB.ORG

Robert Aymar Honoured at CERN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CERN Courier July/August 2011 Faces & Places C e l e b r a t i o n Robert Aymar honoured at CERN On 24 May, Robert Aymar, CERN’s director-general from 2004 to 2008, was awarded the National Order of the Legion of Honour of the French Republic in recognition of his outstanding scientific career. A renowned French physicist, he was director of the superconducting tokamak Tore Supra from 1977 to 1988, director of material sciences at the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) in 1990–1994 and director of the ITER project in 1994–2003. During his term of office at CERN he oversaw the commissioning and start-up of the LHC, which he inaugurated on 21 October 2008 (CERN Courier December 2008 p23). Aymar was presented with the award during a colloquium held at CERN in honour of his 75th birthday. After an introduction by the current director-general, Rolf Heuer, a series of presentations from leaders in the Above: Robert Aymar, right, was presented various fields recalled many of Aymar’s with the medal of the Legion of Honour by important contributions from the early days Bernard Bigot, chairman of the CEA, left. at Tore Supra to the completion of the LHC. Catherine Cesarsky, high commissioner Right: Aymar enjoys a presentation during for atomic energy, provided a contribution the colloquium in honour of his birthday. by video. Bernard Bigot, chairman of the CEA, presented Aymar with the medal of the For the full programme and presentations, Legion of Honour, during his contribution see http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay. towards the end of the colloquium. py?confId=134627. a w a r d s Suzuki and Petcov receive the 2010 Pontecorvo Prize The Pontecorvo Prize for 2010 has been awarded to Yoichiro Suzuki, of the University of Tokyo and director of the Kamioka Observatory, and Serguey Petcov of SISSA, Trieste. Suzuki receives the prize for his “outstanding contribution to the discovery of atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillations in the Super-Kamiokande experiments”, while Petcov is honoured for his “fundamental contribution to the investigation of neutrino propagation in matter, μ→eγ, μ→3e processes and Majorana properties of the neutrino”. Yoichiro Suzuki, left, with Mikhail Itkis, Serguey Petcov, left, with Itkis. (Image The awards ceremony was held on centre, and Alexander Olchevsky. credits: JINR.) 18 February at the 109th session of the JINR Scientific Council. Mikhail Itkis, Laboratory of Nuclear Problems and chair Victor Matveev, and the Scientific Council acting director of JINR, and Alexander of the international prize jury, presented warmly greeted the new laureates, who both Olchevsky, director of the Dzhelepov the awards. The new director-elect of JINR, gave presentations on their work. 43 CCJulAug11-FacesPlaces.indd 43 05/07/2011 18:26 CERN Courier July/August 2011 Faces & Places EPS Accelerator Group announces 2011 prizewinners The European Physical Society Accelerator Group (EPS-AG) has announced the winners of the EPS-AG/ IPAC’11 Accelerator prizes, to be presented at the International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC’11, which will take place on 5–9 September in San Sebastián. Shin-ichi Kurokawa of KEK receives the Rolf Wideröe Prize for outstanding work in the accelerator field (without age uranium. [This was] based on an ambitious limit). He is rewarded for “demonstrating plan involving a new ECR ion source and excellent leadership over many years RFQ injector, followed by a chain of three [making] significant contributions to rings that required the... construction of the the automated control and performance world’s first superconducting sector-magnet of high-energy colliders, as well as to cyclotrons.” international collaboration in the field of The Frank Sacherer Prize, for an particle accelerators”. He was responsible individual in the early part of his or her for the design, construction and operation career, having made a recent significant, of the control system for KEK’s TRISTAN original contribution to the accelerator field, collider – the first full computer control for a goes to CERN’s Rogelio Tomás García. large accelerator in Japan – and set up and led “Among many significant contributions in a the team that brought the KEKB B-factory relatively short career, he is particularly well into being. known for his innovative work in measuring The Gersch Budker Prize, for a recent resonance driving terms and the localization significant, original contribution to the of lattice errors, for optics design including accelerator field, with no age limit, also non-linear properties of beamlines with recognizes Japanese work with the award to applications to the final focus of linear Yasushige Yano, senior adviser and former colliders, and for his contributions to the director of the RIKEN Nishina Center. He LHC operations and its upgrades.” was “responsible for turning the RIKEN Cyclotron Laboratory into the world’s most Clockwise: Shin-ichi Kurokawa. (Image powerful source of cw radioactive isotope credit: KEK). Yasushige Yano. (Image beams for all elements from helium to credit: RIKEN.) Rogelio Tomás García. INR awards the 2011 Markov prizes The Institute for Nuclear Research (INR) The 2011 Markov prize laureates, of the Russian Academy of Sciences left to right: Igor Zeleznykh, Aston in Moscow has awarded the 2011 M A Komar and Alexey Kurepin. Markov Prize to Alexey Kurepin and Igor (Image credit: INR.) Zeleznykh, of the Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and Aston Komar of the Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. They received the awards at the 9th Markov Readings in Moscow on 13 May. other elementary particles”; and Komar for elementary particle physics, nuclear physics Kurepin is recognized for his “great his “great contribution to theoretical and and neutrino astrophysics, was established contribution to researches in the field of experimental studies in elementary particle by INR in memory of Moisey Alexandrovich relativistic nuclear physics and discovery of physics”. Markov (1908–1994), who was one of new properties of nuclei and nuclear matterˮ; The M A Markov Prize, which is awarded the founders of the institute. The Markov Zeleznykh for “proposals and developments for essential contributions to theoretical Readings are held each year on 13 May to of new methods for detecting neutrinos and and experimental studies in the field of commemorate his birthday. 44 CCJulAug11-FacesPlaces.indd 44 05/07/2011 18:27 CERN Courier July/August 2011 Faces & Places L e a r n e d s o c i e t i e s Cifarelli and Stachel rise to the top The European Physical Society (EPS) has its first woman president, since Luisa Cifarelli of the University of Bologna and INFN took over from Maciej Kolwas, at the close of the EPS Council meeting held on 1–2 April. She was elected president by the EPS Council at the meeting held on 19–20 March 2010 and will serve a two-year term, before becoming a vice-president for a further year. Cifarelli studied at the universities of Rome and Bologna, where her thesis supervisor was Antonino Zichichi. Her research work has taken her to CERN, DESY and the Gran Sasso National Laboratory. For Luisa Cifarelli, the first woman president of the past 10 years she has been involved in the EPS. (Image credit: Mike Struik.) the design, construction and running of the huge time-of-flight detector of the ALICE Johanna Stachel with the first supermodule experiment at the LHC, which is based on of the ALICE TRD ready for installation in multigap resistive plate chamber technology. 2006. (Image credit: A Saba/CERN.) She has served on a number of councils, committees and commissions, including German Physical Society (DPG). She will University of Mainz before conducting CERN Council and the INFN Board of be the first female president of the society research with Stony Brook University Directors. when she takes over from Wolfgang Sander and the Brookhaven National Laboratory. Johanna Stachel, professor of physics at in 2012. Founded in 1845, the DPG is the She has received many research awards, the University of Heidelberg and a member world’s oldest physical society and also the including the Federal Cross of Merit in 1999. of the ALICE collaboration at the LHC, largest, with 59 000 members. Within ALICE, she is project leader of the has been elected as the next president of the Stachel received her PhD from the transition radiation detector (TRD). Herwig Schopper becomes honorary member of EPS The European Physical Society (EPS) the development of optics, thin metal layers, has elected Herwig Schopper to honorary nuclear physics, elementary particle physics, membership. Schopper was director-general detector development and accelerator of CERN from 1981–1998, a period that saw technology (CERN Courier November 2009 the approval and construction of the Large p36). The EPS also recognizes Schopper Electron-Positron collider in the 27 km for his successful work as the society’s tunnel now occupied by the LHC. He is president, in transferring the headquarters to honoured for his scientific contributions to Mulhouse. Schopper at CERN in 2009. Venetian academy honours CERN theorist In a ceremony at the Doge’s Palace in Venice the advancement of mathematical, physical on 29 May, Gian Giudice of the theory unit and natural sciences, as well as the at CERN, was nominated academician of the humanities and arts. Past members of the Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ad Arti academy include the mathematicians Tullio (IVSLA) “for his outstanding contributions Levi Civita and Gregorio Ricci Curbastro, to the field of particle physics, and the the scientists Guglielmo Marconi and Luis development of supersymmetry and theories Pasteur, the writers Alessandro Manzoni Gian Giudice, left, at the ceremony with with extra dimensions”. and Ezra Pound, and the sculptor Antonio president of the Academy, Gian Antonio The institute is an academy that promotes Canova.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report to Industry Canada Covering The

    Annual Report to Industry Canada Covering The

    Annual Report to Industry Canada Covering the Objectives, Activities and Finances for the period August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009 and Statement of Objectives for Next Year and the Future Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics 31 Caroline Street North Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5 Table of Contents Pages Period A. August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009 Objectives, Activities and Finances 2-52 Statement of Objectives, Introduction Objectives 1-12 with Related Activities and Achievements Financial Statements, Expenditures, Criteria and Investment Strategy Period B. August 1, 2009 and Beyond Statement of Objectives for Next Year and Future 53-54 1 Statement of Objectives Introduction In 2008-9, the Institute achieved many important objectives of its mandate, which is to advance pure research in specific areas of theoretical physics, and to provide high quality outreach programs that educate and inspire the Canadian public, particularly young people, about the importance of basic research, discovery and innovation. Full details are provided in the body of the report below, but it is worth highlighting several major milestones. These include: In October 2008, Prof. Neil Turok officially became Director of Perimeter Institute. Dr. Turok brings outstanding credentials both as a scientist and as a visionary leader, with the ability and ambition to position PI among the best theoretical physics research institutes in the world. Throughout the last year, Perimeter Institute‘s growing reputation and targeted recruitment activities led to an increased number of scientific visitors, and rapid growth of its research community. Chart 1. Growth of PI scientific staff and associated researchers since inception, 2001-2009.
  • A Search for Lorentz-Boosted Higgs Bosons Decaying to Charm Quarks in the CMS Experiment Using Deep Neural Networks

    A Search for Lorentz-Boosted Higgs Bosons Decaying to Charm Quarks in the CMS Experiment Using Deep Neural Networks

    University of California Santa Barbara A search for Lorentz-boosted Higgs bosons decaying to charm quarks in the CMS experiment using deep neural networks A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Physics by Huilin Qu CERN-THESIS-2019-165 Committee in charge: Professor Joseph Incandela, Chair Associate Professor Nathaniel Craig Professor Jeffrey Richman September 2019 The Dissertation of Huilin Qu is approved. Associate Professor Nathaniel Craig Professor Jeffrey Richman Professor Joseph Incandela, Committee Chair September 2019 A search for Lorentz-boosted Higgs bosons decaying to charm quarks in the CMS experiment using deep neural networks Copyright © 2019 by Huilin Qu iii Acknowledgements The pursuit of my Ph.D. in particle physics is a long journey with many ups and downs. I am grateful to so many people who showed up along this way, influenced me greatly with their knowledge and character, and provided me with invaluable help and support. I apologize I cannot name every one of them here – the list is too long. But I have my sincere gratitude to all of them deep in my heart. First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my research advisor, Prof. Joseph Incandela, for being always so supportive and inspiring, for allowing a lot of freedom in my research, and for providing me with countless valuable suggestions not only about my research but also on how to grow as a scientist. Talking with him is like magic – his words are so inspiring, and can always clear up my doubts and leave me motivated.
  • Dancing to the Tempo of LEP

    Dancing to the Tempo of LEP

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS CERN COURIER VOLUME 40 NUMBER 10 DECEMBER 2000 Dancing to the tempo of LEP SPIN SUPERSYMMETRY INTERNET Polarized protons accelerated Striking suggestions for How the Web was Born, a new in new RHIC ring p8 additional physics symmetry pl7 book p43 E RI Hew Gêner CES Creative Electronic Systems 70 route du Hunt-dun*! CH-1213 Petit-Uncy, Switzerland Internet: nttp://www.ces.cft I The Ultimate VME Machine CES Switzeriand The RI03 features a twin bus architecture, a Tel: ^41.22.879.51.00 ifque fnter-processor communication mechanism Fax: +4U2.792.57.4d Email; [email protected] for ultra-high-speed data acquisitions g and user-level load balance control CES.O Germany with dedicated hardware. Tel: +49.60.51.96.97.41 Fax; +49.60,51.96.97.33 Sheer Speed: Êttuiil: [email protected] # • VME - block transfers in 2eSST at CES MSâ 300 MBytes/s, single cycles at 20 MBytes/s Tel:+ 1.518.843.1445 Fax;+1.518.643.1447 * Memory - 400 MBytes/s average, Email: [email protected] 800 MBytes/s peak • Multi-Access - VME + PCM + PCI 2 + CPU without global degradation CPU Power: PowerPC 750 or 7400 at maximum available speed I Flexible: Two Independent 64-bit PCI with simultaneous access to the memory I Scalable: Up to four additional PMC's on a PMC carrier system MFCC 844x PMC PROCESSORS • 130 KGates user-FPGA • Continuous acquisition at 50 MBytes/s In 32 or 64~bit mode • Full 750 / 7400 computing core • Full network services on PCI * Complete multi-processing software with connection oriented high-speed data transfers SOFTWARE SUPPORT VxWorics®, Lynxob®, muecat® and LINUX® development software including support for hard real-time target machines.
  • Language and Materiality Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations

    Language and Materiality Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations

    Language and Materiality Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations Edited by Jillian R. Cavanaugh CUNY, New York Shalini Shankar Northwestern University University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia 4843/24, 2nd Floor, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi - 110002, India 79 Anson Road, #06-04/06, Singapore 079906 Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107180949 DOI: 10.1017/9781316848418 C Cambridge University Press 2017 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2017 Printed in <country> by <printer> A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISBN 978-1-107-18094-9 Hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. 4 Fontroversy! Or, How to Care about the Shape of Language Keith M. Murphy Introduction On July 4, 2012, standing in the well of a packed lecture hall on the cam- pus of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), just outside Geneva, particle physicist Joseph Incandela looked up at the hall’s projection screen and, with only a hint of nerves in his voice, uttered the following pro- nouncement: “If we combine the ZZ and gamma-gamma, this is what we get.
  • Advanced Information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004

    Advanced Information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004

    Advanced information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004 Information Department, P.O. Box 50005, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 673 95 00, Fax: +46 8 15 56 70, E-mail: [email protected], Website: www.kva.se Asymptotic Freedom and Quantum ChromoDynamics: the Key to the Understanding of the Strong Nuclear Forces The Basic Forces in Nature We know of two fundamental forces on the macroscopic scale that we experience in daily life: the gravitational force that binds our solar system together and keeps us on earth, and the electromagnetic force between electrically charged objects. Both are mediated over a distance and the force is proportional to the inverse square of the distance between the objects. Isaac Newton described the gravitational force in his Principia in 1687, and in 1915 Albert Einstein (Nobel Prize, 1921 for the photoelectric effect) presented his General Theory of Relativity for the gravitational force, which generalized Newton’s theory. Einstein’s theory is perhaps the greatest achievement in the history of science and the most celebrated one. The laws for the electromagnetic force were formulated by James Clark Maxwell in 1873, also a great leap forward in human endeavour. With the advent of quantum mechanics in the first decades of the 20th century it was realized that the electromagnetic field, including light, is quantized and can be seen as a stream of particles, photons. In this picture, the electromagnetic force can be thought of as a bombardment of photons, as when one object is thrown to another to transmit a force.
  • Belgian Nobel Laureate Englert Lauds Late Colleague Brout 8 October 2013

    Belgian Nobel Laureate Englert Lauds Late Colleague Brout 8 October 2013

    Belgian Nobel laureate Englert lauds late colleague Brout 8 October 2013 Belgian scientist Francois Englert said his Last year, the Large Hadron Collider at CERN happiness Tuesday at winning the Nobel Prize for finally provided the experimental proof to back up Physics was tempered with regret that life-long the theory and Englert paid tribute to all the colleague Robert Brout could not enjoy the plaudits scientists, including Higgs, who had helped solve too. the great puzzle of modern physics. "Of course I am happy to have won the prize, that Englert said he and his colleagues all understood goes without saying, but there is regret too that my the importance of their work but the idea that they colleague and friend, Robert Brout, is not there to one day would win the Nobel prize had never been share it," Englert told a press conference at the an issue. Free University of Brussels (ULB). Asked what comes next, he replied: "There are Robert Brout died in 2011, having begun the huge numbers of problems still be solved. This just search for the elusive Higgs Boson—the "God marks a step in our understanding of the world." particle"—with Englert in the 1960s at the ULB. © 2013 AFP "It was a very long collaboration, it was a friendship. I was with Robert until his death," Englert said. Now 80 but still working, the bespectacled and bearded professor responded in good humour to questions, joking about the delay in the announcement. With no news for an hour, Englert said he had thought it was not to be but "we decided just the same to have a party..
  • 2016 Faculty Research Lecture Flyer

    2016 Faculty Research Lecture Flyer

    THE 61ST ANNUAL FACULTY RESEARCH LECTURE Joseph Incandela Searching for the Genetic Code of our Universe Monday, October 17, 2016 / FREE 4:00 PM Reception/ 5:00 PM Lecture Corwin Pavilion University Center The 2012 discovery of the Higgs boson at the CERN LHC accelerator complex completes a powerful and comprehensive description of nature known as the standard model of particle physics. The next step is to find the new physics that underpins this model, which many physicists believe could solve mysteries first seen in astrophysical and cosmological data, such as dark matter and neutrino mixing. Professor Incandela will give a general overview of where things stand and what's being planned, including his own research plans to address these very fundamental questions about the universe. Joseph Incandela received his PhD from the University of Chicago under Professor Henry Frisch in 1986 for a search for magnetic monopoles using superconducting coils whose currents were measured by Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices. Awarded a CERN Fellowship in 1987, he joined the UA2 experiment at CERN and was a leading contributor to the first precision measurement of the mass of the Z boson. He then proposed and led the first search at a hadron collider for a Higgs boson using hadronic tau decay final states. He joined the CDF experiment as a Wilson Fellow at Fermilab in 1991 where he led silicon detector projects and also led the search for top quarks that provided the most significant contribution to the discovery of the top quark in 1995. With regard to the LHC, he created the US CMS Silicon tracker project in 1997 that eventually constructed and tested ~60% (by area) of the silicon strip tracking system.
  • HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS ADVISORY PANEL to the U.S. DEPARTMENT of ENERGY and NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

    HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS ADVISORY PANEL to the U.S. DEPARTMENT of ENERGY and NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

    HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS ADVISORY PANEL to the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES Hilton Washington DC North/Gaithersburg 620 Perry Parkway Gaithersburg, MD 20877 May 14-15, 2018 HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS ADVISORY PANEL 2 SUMMARY OF MEETING The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and National Science Foundation (NSF) High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) was convened at 8:48 a.m. ET on May14-15, 2018, at the Hilton Washington DC North/Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, MD, by Panel Chair Andrew Lankford. The meeting was open to the public and conducted in accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) requirements. Attendees can visit http://science.energy.gov/hep/hepap for more information about HEPAP. Panel members present: JoAnne Hewett, Chair Kent Irwin Christopher Stubbs Janet Conrad Kay Kinoshita Michael Syphers Kyle Cranmer David Larbalestier Mark Trodden Rohini Godbole Donatella Lucchesi James Wells Jordan Goodman Fulvia Pilat Geralyn Zeller Salman Habib Thomas Roser Joseph Incandela Maria Spiropulu HEPAP Designated Federal Officer: John Boger, DOE, Office of Science (SC), Office of High Energy Physics (HEP), Research Technology, Detector Research & Development (R&D), Director Others present for all or part of the meeting: David Asner, Brookhaven National Michael Cooke, DOE Laboratory (BNL) Jean Cottam, NSF Tali Bar-Shalom, Office of Management and Glen Crawford, DOE Budget Patricia Crumley, DOE Rich Barvainis, NSF Paul Dabbar, DOE Lothar Bauerdick, Fermi National Kyle Dawson, University of Utah Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) Marcel Demarteau, Argonne National Doug Benjamin, Duke University Laboratory (ANL) Steve Binkley, DOE Richard Dubois, National Aeronautics and Kevin Black, Boston University Space Administration (NASA) Ken Bloom, University of Nebraska Allison Eckhardt, DOE Greg Bock, Fermilab James Fast, PNNL Joel Butler, Fermilab Laura Fields, Fermilab C.
  • Building for Discovery: Strategic Plan for U.S. Particle Physics in the Global Context Vi

    Building for Discovery: Strategic Plan for U.S. Particle Physics in the Global Context Vi

    Building for Discovery Strategic Plan for U.S. Particle Physics in the Global Context Report of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel (P5) May 2014 Report of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel i Preface Panel reports usually convey their results logically and dispas- to our community, to those who charged us, and to scientists sionately, with no mention of the emotional, soul-searching in other fields. Our community’s passion, dedication, and entre- processes behind them. We would like to break with tradition preneurial spirit have been inspirational. Therefore, to our to share some behind-the-scenes aspects and perspectives. colleagues across our country and around the world, we say a heartfelt thank you. Every request we made received a thought- This is a challenging time for particle physics. The science is ful response, even when the requests were substantial and the deeply exciting and its endeavors have been extremely suc- schedules tight. A large number of you submitted inputs to cessful, yet funding in the U.S. is declining in real terms. This the public portal, which we very much appreciated. report offers important opportunities for U.S. investment in science, prioritized under the tightly constrained budget sce- In our deliberations, no topic or option was off the table. Every narios in the Charge. We had the responsibility to make the alternative we could imagine was considered. We worked by tough choices for a world-class program under each of these consensus—even when just one or two individuals voiced con- scenarios, which we have done. At the same time, we felt the cerns, we worked through the issues.
  • A Physicist Goes in Search of Our Origins

    A Physicist Goes in Search of Our Origins

    Books & arts researchers and practitioners, the book charts rooted. Why? Because using data to inform we need to address the source of the bias. a slow, steady, complex progress, with many automated decisions often ignores the con- This will be done not through technological lows and some incredible highs. texts, emotions and relationships that are core fixes, but by education and social change. At We meet people such as Rich Caruana, now to human choices. the same time, research is needed to address senior principal researcher at Microsoft in Data are not raw materials. They are always the field’s perverse dependence on correla- Redmond, Washington, who was asked as a about the past, and they reflect the beliefs, tions in data. Current AI identifies patterns, graduate student to glance at something that practices and biases of those who create and not meaning. led to his life’s work — optimizing data cluster- collect them. Yet current application of auto- Meticulously researched and superbly writ- ing and compression to make models that are mated decision-making is informed more by ten, these books ultimately hold up a mirror. both intelligible and accurate. And we walk efficiency and economic benefits than by its They show that the responsible — ethical, legal along the beach with Marc Bellemare, who pio- effects on people. and beneficial — development and use of AI is neered reinforcement learning while working Worse, most approaches to AI empower not about technology. It is about us: how we with games for the Atari console and is now at those who have the data and the computa- want our world to be; how we prioritize human Google Research in Montreal, Canada.
  • Nature Physics Advance Online Publication, 8 October 2013 Doi:10.1038/Nphys2800 Research Highlight Nobel Prize 2013: Englert

    Nature Physics Advance Online Publication, 8 October 2013 Doi:10.1038/Nphys2800 Research Highlight Nobel Prize 2013: Englert

    Nature Physics advance online publication, 8 October 2013 doi:10.1038/nphys2800 Research Highlight Nobel Prize 2013: Englert and Higgs Alison Wright The Nobel Prize in Physics 2013 has been awarded to François Englert and Peter Higgs "for the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the origin of mass of subatomic particles, and which recently was confirmed through the discovery of the predicted fundamental particle, by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN's Large Hadron Collider". It is probably the most widely anticipated Nobel award ever made — even as the announcement on 8 October was delayed by an hour, it still seemed certain that the prize would be given for what is generally known as the Higgs mechanism, cemented by the discovery of a Higgs boson at CERN last year. The only uncertainty lay in quite who would claim a slice of the prize. In 1964, François Englert and his colleague Robert Brout published a paper1 in Physical Review Letters in which they outlined a possible mechanism for the generation of particle masses. A few weeks later — in a world without e-mail or preprint servers — Peter Higgs published a similar, independent work2, and also mentioned the existence of a particle associated with the postulated field that would provoke the mass-generating mechanism. (These have since been known as the Higgs boson, the Higgs field and the Higgs mechanism.) And just a few weeks later still, Gerald Guralnik, Carl Hagen and Tom Kibble followed up with their own, independent, version3 of the same mechanism.
  • 03 Hooft FINAL.Indd

    03 Hooft FINAL.Indd

    NATURE|Vol 448|19 July 2007|doi:10.1038/nature06074 INSIGHT PERSPECTIVE The making of the standard model Gerard ’t Hooft A seemingly temporary solution to almost a century of questions has become one of physics’ greatest successes. The standard model of particle physics is more than a model. It is a abs = 1 K0 K+ s = 0 n p detailed theory that encompasses nearly all that is known about the subatomic particles and forces in a concise set of principles and equa- s = 0 π– π0 η π+ s = –1 Σ – Σ0 Λ Σ + tions. The extensive research that culminated in this model includes q = 1 q = 1 numerous small and large triumphs. Extremely delicate experiments, – as well as tedious theoretical calculations — demanding the utmost of s = –1 K– K0 s = –2 Ξ – Ξ 0 human ingenuity — have been essential to achieve this success. q = –1 q = 0 q = –1 q = 0 Prehistory Figure 1 | The eightfold way. Spin-zero mesons (a) and spin-half baryons (b) The beginning of the twentieth century was marked by the advent of can be grouped according to their electric charge, q, and strangeness, s, to 1 two new theories in physics . First, Albert Einstein had the remarkable form octets (which are now understood to represent the flavour symmetries insight that the laws of mechanics can be adjusted to reflect the princi- between the quark constituents of both mesons and baryons). ple of relativity of motion, despite the fact that light is transmitted at a finite speed. His theoretical construction was called the special theory momentum was bounded by the square of the mass measured in units of relativity, and for the first time, it was evident that purely theoretical, of ~1 gigaelectronvolt (Fig.