DOCSLIB.ORG

Explanatory Framework for Adequacy Discussions Section J2: Supplementary Material – Legislation and Other Documents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Explanatory Framework for Adequacy Discussions Section J2: Supplementary Material – Legislation and Other Documents Explanatory Framework for Adequacy Discussions Section J2: Supplementary Material – Legislation and other documents Overview This section lists the legislation that has been made reference to elsewhere, with links to the legislation. It also contains links to the supplementary material referenced in Section H. Section J2: Supplementary Material – Legislation and other documents Links to legislation referenced elsewhere Act Link http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/9 Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 4/contents Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/24/co 2001 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/1/cont Banking Act 2009 ents Business Protection from Misleading http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/1276/co Marketing Regulations 2008 ntents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/41/co Charities Act 1992 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/50/co Charities Act 2006 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/25/co Charities Act 2011 ntents https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2011/1/conte Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 nts The Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 (Rules of Procedure in Children’s http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2013/194/conte Hearings) Rules 2013 nts/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/36/co Civil Contingencies Act 2004 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/co Communications Act 2003 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/6/cont Companies Act 1985 ents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/co Companies Act 2006 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/18/co Computer Misuse Act 1990 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/co Consumer Credit Acts 1974 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1987/43/co Consumer Protection Act 1987 ntents 1 Section J2: Supplementary Material – Legislation and other documents https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/consume Consumer Protection Cooperation rs/consumer-protection-cooperation-regulation_e Regulation n Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/1277/c Regulations 2008 ontents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/co Consumer Rights Act 2015 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/co Copyright Design and Patents Act 1988 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/6/cont Counter Terrorism and Security Act 2015 ents/ http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/28/co Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/36/co Court of Session Act 1988 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/22/co Crime and Courts Act 2013 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/24/co Crime and Security Act 2001 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2016/1/conten Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2016 ts http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/33/co Criminal Justice Act 1988 ntents Criminal Justice and Data Protection http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/3191/co (Protocol No.36) Regulations 2014 ntents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/16/co Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/45/co Criminal Law Act 1977 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/46/co Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 ntents Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/25/co 1996 ntents Customs and Excise Management Act https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/2/con 1979 tents Data Protection (Charges and http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/480/cont 2 Section J2: Supplementary Material – Legislation and other documents Information) Regulations 2018 ents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/co Data Protection Act 1998 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/co ntents [Explanatory Note: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/pdf Data Protection Act 2018 s/ukpgaen_20180012_en.pdf] ​ http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/419/cont The Data Protection, Privacy and ents/made Electronic Communications Keeling Schedules: (Amendments etc) (EU Exit) Regulations https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dat 2019 a-protection-law-eu-exit The Data Protection, Privacy and Electronic Communications (Amendments http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/485/cont etc) (EU Exit) (No. 2) Regulations 2019 ents/made Data Retention and Investigatory Powers http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/27/co Act 2014 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2017/30/co Digital Economy Act 2017 ntents https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/? Directive (EU) 2015/849 uri=celex%3A32015L0849 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/? Directive 1999/93/EC uri=CELEX%3A31999L0093 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/44/co Education (Scotland) Act 1980 ntents The Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/696/cont Regulations 2016 ents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/40/co Enterprise Act 2002 ntents Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/24/co 2013 ntents Environmental Information (Scotland) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2004/520/conte Regulations 2004 nts/made Environmental Information Regulations http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/3391/co 2004 ntents 3 Section J2: Supplementary Material – Legislation and other documents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/co Equality Act 2010 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1972/68/co European Communities Act 1972 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/21/co Financial Services Act 2012 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/8/cont Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 ents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/27/co Firearms Act 1968 ntents Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2002/13/conte 2002 nts http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/co Freedom of Information Act 2000 ntents Health and Social Care (National Data http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/31/co Guardian) Act 2018 ntents Health Service (Control of Patient http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/1438/co Information) Regulations 2002 ntents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1993/46/co Health Service Commissioners Act 1993 ntents Human Fertilisation and Embryology http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/985/cont (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010 ents/made Human Fertilisation and Embryology http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/1412/co (Parental Orders) Regulations 2018 ntents/made Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/37/co 1990 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/co Human Rights Act 1998 ntents Implementing Recommendations of the https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ53/PLA 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 W-110publ53.pdf INSPIRE (Scotland) Regulations 2009 (S.S.I. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2009/440/conte 2009/440) nts/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/13/co Intelligence Services Act 1994 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/56/co Interception of Communications Act 1985 ntents 4 Section J2: Supplementary Material – Legislation and other documents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1978/30/co Interpretation Act 1978 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2016/25/co Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/18/co Justice and Security Act 2013 ntents https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/? Law Enforcement Directive uri=CELEX%3A32016L0680 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/22/co Local Government Act 2000 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/42/co Local Government and Housing Act 1989 ntents Magistrates' Court (Children and Young http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1992/2071/co Persons) Rules 1992 ntents/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/20/co Mental Health Act 1983 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/38/co Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/1 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 00/contents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/6/cont Official Secrets Act 1989 ents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1993/48/co Pension Schemes Act 1993 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/8/cont Pension Schemes Act 2015 ents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2017/17/co Pension Schemes Act 2017 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/35/co Pensions Act 2004 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/16/co Police Act 1996 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/50/co Police Act 1997 ntents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/co Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 ntents 5 Section J2: Supplementary Material – Legislation and other documents Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2012/8/conten 2012 ts The Police (Complaints and Misconduct) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/643/reg Regulations 2004 ulation/2/made http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/30/co Police Reform Act 2002 ntents Police Reform and Social Responsibility http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/13/co Act 2011 ntents Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2006/10/conte (Scotland) Act 2006 nts http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2017/3/cont Policing and Crime Act 2017 ents http://www.legislation.gov.uk/all?title=Political%2 Political Parties, Elections and 0Parties%2C%20Elections%20and%20Referendum Referendums Act 2000 s%20Act%202000 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/26/co
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
    Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta Citation: AVI v MHVB, 2020 ABQB 790 Date:20201216 Docket: FL03 55142 Registry: Edmonton Between: AVI Applicant and MHVB Respondent and Jacqueline Robinson, a.k.a. Jacquie Phoenix Third Party and Unauthorized Alleged Representative _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Decision of the Honourable Mr. Justice Robert A. Graesser _______________________________________________________ I. Introduction [1] This is a follow-up to my decision of August 26, 2020 in AVI v MHVB, 2020 ABQB 489 [AVI #1]. That decision centred on an intermeddler to a child custody dispute. The third party, whose actual name is Jacqueline Robinson, instead self-identified as “Jacquie Phoenix, Sovereign Woman Living on the Land, Legal Beneficiary / Soul Administrator To the Trust of Page: 2 the Legal Fiction Known as Jacqueline Robinson”. I will in this decision refer to Ms. Robinson by her actual name, “Jacqueline Robinson”, rather than the legally meaningless “Strawman” legal persona she has adopted. [2] As discussed in AVI #1, Ms. Robinson is a pseudolaw promoter, or “guru”. Pseudolaw is a collection of spurious legally incorrect ideas that superficially sound like law, and purport to be real law. In Meads v Meads, 2012 ABQB 571 [“Meads”], ACJ Rooke grouped these concepts together under the term “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments”, or “OPCA”. In layman’s terms, pseudolaw is pure nonsense. [3] Gurus are a particularly obnoxious component of the pseudolaw phenomenon. They operate as “Typhoid Marys” who spread the pseudolaw “disease of ideas” into new populations: Donald J Netolitzky, “The History of the Organized Pseudolaw Commercial Argument Phenomenon in Canada” (2016) 53:3 Alta LR 609 at 611.
    [Show full text]
  • FAQ: Brexit and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
    FAQ: Brexit and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Part One: What is the Charter? June 2018 Contents Q: What is the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights? A: At the Cologne European Council in June 1999, the European Council adopted a decision on the drawing up of a Charter of The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. That decision stated: Fundamental Rights brings together in a single “There appears to be a need, at the present stage of the Union’s document the fundamental development, to establish a Charter of fundamental rights in rights protected in the order to make their overriding importance and relevance more EU. It was proclaimed in visible to the Union’s citizens”. 2000 and became legally binding in 2009. Although The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (the Charter) brings together in a there is overlap between single document the fundamental rights protected in the EU. The Charter the EU Charter and the sets out rights and freedoms under six titles: Dignity, Freedoms, Equality, European Convention on Solidarity, Citizens’ Rights, and Justice. The accompanying Explanatory Human Rights / the UK Notes are “a valuable tool of interpretation intended to clarify the Human Rights Act, there are important procedural provisions of the Charter” and they set out the sources of the provisions and substantive differences. in the Charter. However, legal experts have commented that, “The Charter is often described as a strand-tying document … However, the This FAQ discusses: characterisation of the Charter thus, as a tidying or strand-tying exercise only, tends to underplay its importance” (C Gallagher, A Patrick and K • The background to O’Byrne 2018 at para 2.12).
    [Show full text]
  • Explanatory Notes
    These notes refer to the Serious Crime Bill [HL] as introduced in the House of Lords on 5th June 2014 [HL Bill 1] SERIOUS CRIME BILL [HL] —————————— EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These Explanatory Notes relate to the Serious Crime Bill [HL] as introduced into the House of Lords on 5th June 2014. They have been prepared by the Home Office in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. 2. The Notes need to be read in conjunction with the Bill. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. So where a clause or part of a clause does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given. 3. A glossary of abbreviations and terms used in these Explanatory Notes is contained in Annex A to these Notes. OVERVIEW 4. Serious and organised crime includes drug trafficking, human trafficking, organised illegal immigration, child sexual exploitation, high value fraud and other financial crime, counterfeiting, organised acquisitive crime and cyber crime. Organised crime costs the United Kingdom at least £24 billion each year. As at December 2013, there are some 36,600 organised criminals in 5,300 groups currently operating in ways that directly affect the UK1. In October 2013, the Government published its Serious and Organised Crime Strategy (Cm 8715)2. The aim of the strategy is to reduce substantially the level of serious and organised crime affecting the UK and its interests.
    [Show full text]
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Torrible, Clare Title: How do civil actions against the police and police complaints interact and what does this interaction reveal about police legitimacy? General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. How do civil actions against the police and police complaints interact and what does this interaction reveal about police legitimacy? Clare Torrible A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Social Sciences and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Guidance for Police Collaboration 12Th March 2010
    STATUTORY GUIDANCE FOR POLICE COLLABORATION 12TH MARCH 2010 Statutory Guidance for Police Collaboration 1 2 Statutory Guidance for Police Collaboration Contents INTRODUCTION 5 NOTE ON DIRECTION AND CONTROL 6 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE POLICE ACT 1996 7 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 7 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 12 RIPA AND COLLABORATIONS 25 THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MUTUAL AID AND COLLABORATIONS 27 MODELS OF COLLABORATION 29 AVOIDING BUREAUCRACY 29 CHOOSING COLLABORATION PARTNERS AND COLLABORATION MODELS 29 GOVERNANCE 31 FUNDING 35 WORKFORCE ARRANGEMENTS 37 LEGAL DUTIES AND LIABILITY FOR BREACH 41 PROCUREMENT 51 PROCUREMENT CONSIDERATIONS 51 MANAGING THE COLLABORATION OVER TIME 53 REVIEWING AND AMENDING THE AGREEMENT 53 NEW PROJECTS 53 ENDING THE AGREEMENT 53 EXIT STRATEGY 53 ANNEX A – DECISION PROCESS FOR COLLABORATION 55 ANNEX B – GLOSSARY 57 Statutory Guidance for Police Collaboration 3 This Statutory Guidance was developed by the Home Office with the assistance of consultants from Tribal involving wide consultation and review with partners throughout the police service. It has been endorsed by the tripartite National Police Protective Services Board (a sub-committee of the National Policing Board) whose member organisations include the Home Office, the Association of Chief Police Officers, the Association of Police Authorities, the Association of Police Authority Chief Executives, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and the National Policing Improvement Agency. It has also been approved by the Police Advisory Board of England and Wales. All of the above organisations, as well as the many individual reviewers and reference group members, are thanked for their substantial contributions. Through this Statutory Guidance document the Secretary of State is exercising his power (in section 23F of the Police Act 1996 (as amended by the Policing and Crime Act 2009)) to provide guidance about collaboration agreements or related matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Forum Strategic Panel Phorm Position Paper
    Security Forum Strategic Panel Phorm Position Paper PHORM – PRIVACY IMPACT OF NEW INTERNET ADVERTISING MECHANISMS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Online advertising company Phorm has caused a stir in the Internet community because of its profile-driven service. Phorm has trialled this service with BT, and signed further contracts with Virgin Media and TalkTalk. However, critics claim that the service breaches the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (2000), and that Phorm’s approach is contrary to users’ privacy wishes. 1.2. The BCS believes that the solution to this debate rests in self-regulation of online advertising: companies must establish and enforce a code of conduct; be completely transparent about their practices; resist sharing data with third parties; and submit to ongoing oversight from an independent third party organisation. 2. THE BATTLE FOR THE INTERNET 2.1. The massive market for online advertising is one that affects every Internet user: many search engines and websites depend upon advertising revenues for funding, and some ISPs use advertising to subsidise subscription costs. In the absence of those funding sources they would either have to pass on additional operating costs to users, or cease trading altogether. 2.2. The battle for control of Internet advertising had, until recently, been confined to a small number of (rapidly consolidating) players including the likes of Microsoft, Google, Yahoo! and DoubleClick. These well-established companies have built their offerings over many years and believed themselves to control the market, with little threat from new companies. 2.3. However, a new breed of online advertising company has recently appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Circular 2018/01: Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act
    Circular 2018/01 TITLE: ASSAULTS ON EMERGENCY WORKERS (OFFENCES) ACT 2018 From: Bail, Sentencing and Release Policy Distribution Date: 13/11/2018 Implementation Date: 13/11/2018 For further information Ashir Mir, Sentencing Policy Advisor contact: Bail, Sentencing and Release Policy [email protected] 07547 970008 BroaD subject: Criminal Law Sub category: Assaults on Emergency Workers This circular is for: Lord Chief Justice, President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Senior Presiding Judge, Justices of the Supreme Court, Lords Justices of Appeal, High Court Judges, Crown Court Judges, District Judges (Magistrates Courts), Bench Chairmen, Clerks to the Justices, Chief Crown Prosecutors, Council of Circuit Judges, Magistrates’ Association, Justices’ Clerks’ Society, Registrar of Criminal Appeals, The Law Society, The Bar Council, the Criminal Bar Association, National Police Chief’s Council, Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, Police Federation, Superintendents’ Association, Chief Police Officer’s Staff Association, College of Policing, Association of Special Constabulary Officers, Unison, Royal College of Nursing, Fire and Rescue Services Association, Fire Brigades Union, Fire Officers Association, National Fire Chiefs Council, Local Government Association, National Joint Council, Prison Officers’ Association, Prison Governors Association ASSAULTS ON EMERGENCY WORKERS (OFFENCES) ACT 2018 INTRODUCTION 1. The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 received Royal Assent on 13 September 2018 and will come into force on 13 November 2018. The Act is set out in full at Annex A. 2. The Act is a response to the increase, in recent years, in the number of assaults on emergency workers. There were 26,000 assaults on police officers in the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perilous Dialogue
    The Perilous Dialogue Laura K. Donohuet Five months before his retirement, Justice William Brennan wrote in a dissent: "the Framers of the Bill of Rights did not purport to 'create' rights. Rather, they designed the Bill of Rights to prohibit our Government from infringing rights and liberties presumed to be pre-existing."1 Professor Stephen Holmes reminds us in his lecture that such rights and liberties do not impede progress: they embody it. 2 The rules preserving rights and liberties can help to focus action by bringing clarity to the present, while still preserving a long- term political perspective. Yet, time and again, both these rights and the rules designed to protect them are sacrificed in the name of national security. The master metaphor in each sacrifice is, indeed, "security or freedom," and it is on this metaphor that I would like to focus. It dominates the counterterrorist discourse both in the United States and abroad.3 Transcripts from debates in Ireland's Ddil 1tireann, Turkey's Bilyilk Millet Meclisi, and Australia's Parliament are filled with reference to the need to weigh the value of liberty against the threat posed by terrorism. Perhaps nowhere is this more pronounced than in the United Kingdom, where, for decades, counterterrorist debates have turned on this framing. 4 However, owing in part to different Copyright © 2009 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications. t Fellow, Constitutional Law Center, Stanford Law School. Special thanks to the Brennan Institute for their invitation to participate in the series, to Stephen Holmes and Paul Schwartz for their comments at the lecture, and to Aaron Gershbock at the California Law Review for his excellent editorial assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years of the Human Rights Act: Extracts from the Evidence Contents
    Rt Hon Harriet Harman MP Twenty years of the Human Rights Act: Extracts from the evidence Contents 1 ECtHR Judgments against the UK: the effects of the HRA 2 2 Relationship of UK Courts and ECtHR 4 3 Using the ECHR in the UK courts 5 4 Judgments on rights 7 5 Wider policy changes brought about through individual legal cases 8 6 The Human Rights Act and Parliament 9 7 The Human Rights Act and Legislation 11 Parliamentary scrutiny of legislation 12 The process when UK courts consider legislation is not compliant with the Convention 12 8 Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 14 Change secured without using court proceedings 15 Training in Human Rights 16 9 Further issues raised in evidence 18 Incorporation of other human rights treaties? 18 The definition of public authority 18 Access to justice 19 Freedom of Religion and Belief 20 Wider Understanding of Rights 21 2 Twenty years of the Human Rights Act: Extracts from the evidence 1 ECtHR Judgments against the UK: the effects of the HRA Box 1: Lord Irvine of Lairg, House of Lords Second Reading Debate, 3 Nov 1997 “Our legal system has been unable to protect people in the 50 cases in which the European Court has found a violation of the convention by the United Kingdom. That is more than any other country except Italy. The trend has been upwards. Over half the violations have been found since 1990.”1 Source: HL Deb, 3 Nov 1997, col 1228 Box 2: Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law […] In 2017 only 0.2%, 2 out of all 1,068 judgments given by the Strasbourg Court found a violation by the UK, and in 2016 this figure was 0.7%, 7 out of all 993 judgments.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Gaps” and the Possible Abolition of Consensual Stop and Search
    “Legislative gaps” and the possible abolition of consensual stop and search James Chalmers, University of Glasgow 24 June 2015 1. I have been asked to provide a note for the Independent Advisory Group on Stop and Search on the legislative gaps which might be left if consensual stop and search were abolished in Scotland. That note follows. I should note that it has been prepared in a very short timescale and is not intended to represent an authoritative or exhaustive review of the relevant law or principles, but I hope that it is of some assistance to the Group. Background 2. At common law, the police may search the person of anyone they have lawfully arrested. Beyond this, however, there is (except in cases of urgency) no common law power of search. The principle remains that set out by the Lord Justice-General (Inglis) in Jackson v Stevenson (1897) 2 Adam 255 at 260: ...a constable is entitled to arrest, without a warrant, any person seen by him committing a [crime], and he may arrest on the direct information of eye witnesses. Having arrested him, I have no doubt that the constable could search him. But it is a totally different matter to search a man in order to find evidence to determine whether you will apprehend him or not. If the search succeeds... you will apprehend him; but if the search does not succeed, you will not apprehend him. Now, I have only to say that I know of no authority for ascribing to constables the right to make such tentative searches, and they seem contrary to constitutional principle.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies Act 2006
    c i e AT 13 of 2006 COMPANIES ACT 2006 Companies Act 2006 Index c i e COMPANIES ACT 2006 Index Section Page PART I – INCORPORATION AND STATUS OF COMPANIES 11 CHAPTER 1 - INCORPORATION 11 1 Types of company ......................................................................................................... 11 2 Application to incorporate a company ...................................................................... 11 3 Incorporation of a company ........................................................................................ 12 4 Subscribers become members of the company on incorporation .......................... 12 CHAPTER 2 - MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES 12 5 Memorandum................................................................................................................ 12 6 Power to prescribe model articles .............................................................................. 13 7 Effect of memorandum and articles ........................................................................... 14 8 Amendment of memorandum and articles ............................................................... 14 9 Filing of notice of amendment of memorandum or articles ................................... 15 10 Provision of copies of memorandum and articles to members .............................. 15 CHAPTER 3 - COMPANY NAMES 15 11 Required part of company name ................................................................................ 15 12 Requirement for name approval ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE for CHANGE a Review of Pakistan’S Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997
    THE CASE FOR CHANGE A Review of Pakistan’s Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997 October 2013 A Report by the Research Society of International Law, Pakistan i PROJECT RESEARCHERS ISLAMABAD DIVISION Jamal Aziz Muhammad Oves Anwar LL.B (London), LL.M (UCL) LL.B (London), LL.M (SOAS), LL.M (Vienna), D.U. (Montpellier) Saad-ur-Rehman Khan Abid Rizvi LL.B (London), LL.M (Manchester) BA-LL.B (LUMS), LL.M (U.Penn) Aleena Zainab Alavi Zainab Mustafa LL.B (London), LL.M (Warwick) LL.B (London) LAHORE DIVISION Ali Sultan Amna Warsi J.D. (Virginia) LL.M (Punjab) Ayasha Warsi Moghees Khan LL.M (Punjab) LL.B (London), LL.M (Warwick) Mishael Qureshi LL.B (Lond.), LL.M (Sussex) INTERNS Muhammad Bin Majid Muhammad Abdul Ghani Awais Ahmad Khan Ghauri This material may not be copied, reproduced or transmitted in whole or in part without attribution to the Research Society of International Law (RSIL). Unless noted otherwise, all material is property of RSIL. Copyright © Research Society of International Law 2013. ii CONTENTS SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................... IX CHAPTER ONE ....................................................................................................................................... 7 TERRORISM IN THE PAKISTANI CONTEXT .................................................................................. 7 1.1 TRENDS IN TERRORISM ........................................................................................................... 7 1.2 THE ANATOMY OF TERRORISM
    [Show full text]