DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 163 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, APRIL 6, 2017 No. 58—Part III Senate (Legislative day of Tuesday, April 4, 2017) The Senate met at 10 a.m., on the ex- U.S. SENATE, a much larger story, another extreme piration of the recess, and was called to PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, escalation in the left’s never-ending order by the Honorable LUTHER Washington, DC, April 6, 2017. drive to politicize the courts and the To the Senate: STRANGE, a Senator from the State of Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, confirmation process. Alabama. of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby It is a fight they have waged for dec- appoint the Honorable LUTHER STRANGE, a ades with a singular aim: securing raw f Senator from the State of Alabama, to per- power, no matter the cost to country form the duties of the Chair. or institution. It underlies why this PRAYER ORRIN G. HATCH, threatening filibuster cannot be al- The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- President pro tempore. lowed to succeed or continue—for the fered the following prayer: Mr. STRANGE thereupon assumed sake of the Senate, for the sake of the Let us pray. the Chair as Acting President pro tem- Court, and for the sake of our country. O God, our help in ages past, our hope pore. I think a look back through history for years to come, throughout life’s f will help every colleague understand seasons moments of decision arrive. As why. I always had a particular interest EXECUTIVE CALENDAR—Continued our lawmakers prepare to make crit- in the history of judicial nominations. ical decisions, give them the wisdom to RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER It is an interest that predates my serv- choose the more challenging right that The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- ice here as a Senator. I remember serv- brings the greatest glory to Your pore. The majority leader is recog- ing on the staff of a Senator on the Ju- Name. Supply their needs according to nized. diciary Committee during a time when Your riches in glory. Purify their Mr. MCCONNELL. Mr. President, the two different judicial nominees were thoughts as they strive to do Your will. Senate has considered the nomination being considered. One, Harrold Remind them that those who are faith- of Judge Neil Gorsuch for many weeks Carswell, was voted down on the Sen- ful with little will be faithful with now. We have seen his impressive cre- ate floor—correctly, in my view. An- much. May they seek simply to be dentials. We have reviewed his incred- other, Clement Haynesworth, also faithful in whatever You assign their ible record. We have heard glowing failed to receive the necessary support hands to do, striving to please You praise on a nearly daily basis from col- for confirmation—but in error, I with their work. leagues and students, from judges and thought. We pray in Your great Name. Amen. newspaper editorials, from Democrats It piqued my interest on what advice and from Republicans. and consent should mean in the Sen- f Judge Gorsuch is independent, and he ate, and what it actually meant in is fair. He is beyond qualified, and he practice. I would learn later that I was PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE will make a stellar addition to the Su- witnessing the nascent stirrings of The Presiding Officer led the Pledge preme Court. what would soon become the so-called of Allegiance, as follows: Hardly anyone in the legal commu- judicial wars—the left’s efforts to I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the nity seems to argue otherwise, and yet, transform confirmations from con- United States of America, and to the Repub- our Democratic colleagues appear structive debates over qualifications lic for which it stands, one nation under God, poised to block this incredible nominee into raw ideological struggles with no indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. with the first successful partisan fili- rules or limits. buster in American history. It would be It is a struggle that escalated in ear- f a radical move, something completely nest when Democrats and leftwing spe- unprecedented in the history of our cial interests decided to wage war on APPOINTMENT OF ACTING Senate and out of all proportion to the President Reagan’s nominee in 1987, PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE eminently qualified judge who is actu- Robert Bork. Polite comity went out The PRESIDING OFFICER. The ally before us. But then again, this the window as Democrats launched one clerk will please read a communication isn’t really about the nominee anyway. vicious personal attack after another— to the Senate from the President pro The opposition to this particular nomi- not because Bork lacked qualifications tempore (Mr. HATCH). nee is more about the man who nomi- or suffered some ethical failing, but be- The senior assistant legislative clerk nated him and the party he represents cause his views were not theirs. The read the following letter: than the nominee himself. It is part of Washington Post described it at the ∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S2383 . VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:37 Apr 06, 2017 Jkt 069060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G04AP6.288 S04APPT3 SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with SENATE-3 S2384 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE April 6, 2017 time: ‘‘It’s not just that there has been some on my side wanted to defeat their nees. Then, in 2003, according to the an intellectual vulgarization and per- nominations with a filibuster. The Re- New York Times, he ‘‘recommended sonal savagery to elements of the at- publican leadership said: Let’s not do using an extreme tactic, the fili- tack, profoundly distorting the record that. To their great credit, Majority buster,’’ to block them. and the nature of the man.’’ Leader Lott and Judiciary Chairman ‘‘Mr. Schumer,’’ it said, ‘‘urged As NPR would later observe, the HATCH implored our confidence not to Democratic colleagues in the Senate to left’s ‘‘all-out campaign to defeat the do that. Senator Lott filed cloture on use a tactic that some were initially nomination . legitimized scorched- these nominees to advance the nomina- reluctant to pursue, and that has roiled earth ideological wars over nomina- tion. He, Senator HATCH, and I and a the Senate: a filibuster on the floor of tions at the Supreme Court.’’ vast majority of the Republican Con- the chamber to block votes on nomi- I was there. I saw it all. I remember ference voted for cloture to give them nees that he and other Democrats had the viciousness of it. I also remember an up-or-down vote. We didn’t do this decided to oppose.’’ feeling that the Senate was reaching a because we supported the nominees. In It is hard to express how radical a turning point where a judicial nominee fact, most of us voted against their ac- move that was at that time because it would no longer be evaluated on their tual confirmation, but we thought they completely changed the way the Sen- credentials but on their ideology. That deserved an up-or-down vote. That, ate had handled these nominations for observation, unfortunately, has proven after all, was the tradition of the Sen- our entire history. Even filing cloture correct, with Democrats raising the ate. on a judicial nominee had been rare be- stakes and moving the goalposts each Given that we were in the majority fore then, and actually defeating any step of the way. and these nominations were highly judicial nominee by filibuster, other They certainly did so under the next controversial, our determination not to than the bipartisan opposition to the Republican President, George H.W. filibuster but instead advance them to nomination of Abe Fortas back in 1968, Bush. We all know what happened to an up-or-down vote was not, as you in a Presidential election year was Clarence Thomas. If the gloves were off might imagine, popular with our base. simply unheard of. for Bork, the brass knuckles came out But we resisted the political pressure. No longer. Democrats blocked cloture 21 times for Thomas. Here is how left-leaning Again, we respected the Senate’s tradi- on 10 different circuit court nominees, columnist Juan Williams described the tion against filibustering judicial including on outstanding lawyers like situation: ‘‘To listen or read some news nominees. Miguel Estrada, whose nomination was reports on Thomas over the past month But it would matter little to our filibustered an incredible 7 times. is to discover a monster of a man, to- Democratic friends. These are not inflated statistics like Less than a year later, President tally unlike the human being full of the supposed 78 filibusters our Demo- Bush 43 comes to office. Before he had sincerity, confusion, and struggles cratic colleagues are now alleging oc- whom I saw as a reporter who watched submitted a single judicial nominee, curred during the Obama administra- him for some 10 years.’’ our Democratic colleagues held a re- tion, which include numerous instances That is Juan Williams speaking on treat in Farmington, PA. There, ac- in which the prior Democratic leader Clarence Thomas. Williams said: cording to participants, they deter- unnecessarily filed cloture petitions. He has been conveniently transformed into mined to change the ground rules for No, what I am talking about are real a monster about whom it is fair to say any- how they would handle judicial nomi- and repeated filibusters used by Demo- thing, to whom it is fair to do anything.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US Policy Scan 2021
    US Policy Scan 2021 1 • US Policy Scan 2021 Introduction Welcome to Dentons 2021 Policy Scan, an in-depth look at policy a number of Members of Congress and Senators on both sides of at the Federal level and in each of the 50 states. This document the aisle and with a public exhausted by the anger and overheated is meant to be both a resource and a guide. A preview of the rhetoric that has characterized the last four years. key policy questions for the next year in the states, the House of Representatives, the Senate and the new Administration. A Nonetheless, with a Congress closely divided between the parties resource for tracking the people who will be driving change. and many millions of people who even now question the basic legitimacy of the process that led to Biden’s election, it remains to In addition to a dive into more than 15 policy areas, you will find be determined whether the President-elect’s goals are achievable brief profiles of Biden cabinet nominees and senior White House or whether, going forward, the Trump years have fundamentally staff appointees, the Congressional calendar, as well as the and permanently altered the manner in which political discourse Session dates and policy previews in State Houses across the will be conducted. What we can say with total confidence is that, in country. We discuss redistricting, preview the 2022 US Senate such a politically charged environment, it will take tremendous skill races and provide an overview of key decided and pending cases and determination on the part of the President-elect, along with a before the Supreme Court of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide for the Georgia History Exemption Exam Below Are 99 Entries in the New Georgia Encyclopedia (Available At
    Study guide for the Georgia History exemption exam Below are 99 entries in the New Georgia Encyclopedia (available at www.georgiaencyclopedia.org. Students who become familiar with these entries should be able to pass the Georgia history exam: 1. Georgia History: Overview 2. Mississippian Period: Overview 3. Hernando de Soto in Georgia 4. Spanish Missions 5. James Oglethorpe (1696-1785) 6. Yamacraw Indians 7. Malcontents 8. Tomochichi (ca. 1644-1739) 9. Royal Georgia, 1752-1776 10. Battle of Bloody Marsh 11. James Wright (1716-1785) 12. Salzburgers 13. Rice 14. Revolutionary War in Georgia 15. Button Gwinnett (1735-1777) 16. Lachlan McIntosh (1727-1806) 17. Mary Musgrove (ca. 1700-ca. 1763) 18. Yazoo Land Fraud 19. Major Ridge (ca. 1771-1839) 20. Eli Whitney in Georgia 21. Nancy Hart (ca. 1735-1830) 22. Slavery in Revolutionary Georgia 23. War of 1812 and Georgia 24. Cherokee Removal 25. Gold Rush 26. Cotton 27. William Harris Crawford (1772-1834) 28. John Ross (1790-1866) 29. Wilson Lumpkin (1783-1870) 30. Sequoyah (ca. 1770-ca. 1840) 31. Howell Cobb (1815-1868) 32. Robert Toombs (1810-1885) 33. Alexander Stephens (1812-1883) 34. Crawford Long (1815-1878) 35. William and Ellen Craft (1824-1900; 1826-1891) 36. Mark Anthony Cooper (1800-1885) 37. Roswell King (1765-1844) 38. Land Lottery System 39. Cherokee Removal 40. Worcester v. Georgia (1832) 41. Georgia in 1860 42. Georgia and the Sectional Crisis 43. Battle of Kennesaw Mountain 44. Sherman's March to the Sea 45. Deportation of Roswell Mill Women 46. Atlanta Campaign 47. Unionists 48. Joseph E.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress: Finding Directory Information on Members and Committees
    Order Code RL30017 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Congress: Finding Directory Information on Members and Committees Updated March 20, 2003 Jesús Campos Information Research Specialist Information Research Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Congress: Finding Directory Information on Members and Committees Summary This guide describes selected printed and electronic reference sources that provide directory information about current Members of Congress and congressional committees. The electronic reference sources include CD-ROMs and Web sites. Among the resources listed are the Congressional Directory, the Almanac of American Politics, Tell It to Washington, C-SPAN Congress Guide, and Project Vote Smart. These resources may contain any or all of the following types of directory information for Members of the House and Senate: addresses, telephone and fax numbers, e-mail addresses, Web addresses, committee and subcommittee assignments, photographs, biographical information, and names of key staff. An appendix indexes each category and lists which sources include that type of directory information. This report will be updated for each Congress. Contents Introduction ......................................................1 Printed Publications................................................2 Almanac of American Politics ....................................2 The Capital Source ............................................2 Carroll’s Federal Directory .....................................2 Congress
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions of Citizen Advocacy on Capitol Hill 1 1
    Communicating with Congress Perceptions of Citizen Advocacy on Capitol Hill Made possible by grants from Adfero Group, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and CQ Roll Call Special Thanks We are grateful to our sponsors, Adfero Group, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and CQ Roll Call, who have supported this research and report. Their contributions have enabled us to continue the important work of the Communicating with Congress project and promote a more meaningful democratic dialogue. © 2011, Congressional Management Foundation. All Rights Reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced in any manner without the written permission of the Congressional Management Foundation, except brief quotations or charts used in critical articles or reviews. The Partnership For A More Perfect Union at the Congressional Management Foundation 513 Capitol Court NE, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20002 202-546-0100 cmfweb.org pmpu.org Introduction “We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.” That statement by Thomas Jefferson is a commentary on citizens’ right to “petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Effective communications and interactions between citizens and elected officials are essential to the democratic process, both to sustain the credibility of government and to maintain a free flow of ideas which can be integrated into policy decisions. However, since the introduction of the Internet, maintaining that free flow has been a challenge both for Congress and citizens. Congressional offices are overwhelmed with the significant increase in volume and the diversity of delivery methods used by advocate organizations. On the other hand, citizens and the advocacy community have been frustrated by the myriad of technological tools utilized by offices to authenticate that actual constituents are sending messages, yet result in technological and “user interface” obstacles to communications.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide
    Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide Guide to the educational resources available on the GHS website Theme driven guide to: Online exhibits Biographical Materials Primary sources Classroom activities Today in Georgia History Episodes New Georgia Encyclopedia Articles Archival Collections Historical Markers Updated: July 2014 Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide Table of Contents Pre-Colonial Native American Cultures 1 Early European Exploration 2-3 Colonial Establishing the Colony 3-4 Trustee Georgia 5-6 Royal Georgia 7-8 Revolutionary Georgia and the American Revolution 8-10 Early Republic 10-12 Expansion and Conflict in Georgia Creek and Cherokee Removal 12-13 Technology, Agriculture, & Expansion of Slavery 14-15 Civil War, Reconstruction, and the New South Secession 15-16 Civil War 17-19 Reconstruction 19-21 New South 21-23 Rise of Modern Georgia Great Depression and the New Deal 23-24 Culture, Society, and Politics 25-26 Global Conflict World War One 26-27 World War Two 27-28 Modern Georgia Modern Civil Rights Movement 28-30 Post-World War Two Georgia 31-32 Georgia Since 1970 33-34 Pre-Colonial Chapter by Chapter Primary Sources Chapter 2 The First Peoples of Georgia Pages from the rare book Etowah Papers: Exploration of the Etowah site in Georgia. Includes images of the site and artifacts found at the site. Native American Cultures Opening America’s Archives Primary Sources Set 1 (Early Georgia) SS8H1— The development of Native American cultures and the impact of European exploration and settlement on the Native American cultures in Georgia. Illustration based on French descriptions of Florida Na- tive Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Betrayal at the USDA
    SERIES TITLE Betrayal at the USDA How the Trump Administration Is Sidelining Science and Favoring Industry over Farmers and the Public From farm to fork, our nation’s food system should be one we are proud of, one that ensures the success of farmers while Policies and programs protecting our soil and water and helping to make safe and that are based on scientific healthy food available to everyone. Science-based public poli- cies are critical to such a system. Smart policies can invest evidence and that taxpayer dollars in agricultural research and technical assis- tance to help farmers increase profits, reduce soil erosion and prioritize the well-being water pollution, avert crop failures, and boost the resilience of consumers, farmers, of their land to floods and droughts. Science-based public policies also can keep our food supply safe, improve nutrition, and workers make our and improve working conditions for those who produce and communities and our process our food. Ultimately, policies and programs that are based on country stronger. scientific evidence and that prioritize the well-being of consumers, farmers, and workers make our communities and what they grow and how they grow it; the infrastructure and our country stronger. Yet science is too often sidelined from services available in rural communities; the quality of the na- important public decisionmaking by people with something tion’s soil and water resources; and the healthfulness, price, to gain. This has been particularly true during the first year or and selection of food offered to consumers everywhere. The so of the Trump administration, which has sidelined science USDA makes significant investments in science—some $3 bil- to reward industry—with policy decisions that favor their lion annually for agricultural and food research carried out interests—on many issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Issue (PDF)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 162 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MARCH 17, 2016 No. 43 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was point of order that a quorum is not Gunny Stanton first began his train- called to order by the Speaker. present. ing, he attended the basic EOD course f The SPEAKER. Pursuant to clause 8, at Eglin Air Force Base. While in train- rule XX, further proceedings on this ing, his block tests and final examina- PRAYER question will be postponed. tion scores were so high that his The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick The point of no quorum is considered records remain intact to this day. J. Conroy, offered the following prayer: withdrawn. In the course of his 18 years in the Marine Corps, Stanton earned many Merciful God, thank You for giving f us another day. awards too numerous to list in this Your care and wisdom are shown to PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE space. He is preceded in death by his fa- us by the way You extend Your king- The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman ther, Michael Dale Stanton Sr.; and a dom into our world down to the present from Texas (Mr. VEASEY) come forward brother, Brian Stanton. Gunny Stanton day. Your word reveals every aspect of and lead the House in the Pledge of Al- is survived by his loving family: his Your saving plan. You accomplish Your legiance. wife, Terri Stanton; his mother, Gloria designed purpose in and through the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the 200Th Anniversary of the Federal Courts of the District of Columbia
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2002 Celebrating the 200th Anniversary of the Federal Courts of the District of Columbia Susan Low Bloch Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1516 90 Geo. L.J. 549-605 (2002) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Courts Commons, and the Legal History Commons Celebrating the 200th Anniversary of the Federal Courts of the District of Columbia SUSAN Low BLOCH* AND RUTH BADER GINSBURG** INTRODUCTION February 27, 2001 marked the 200th anniversary of the federal courts of the District of Columbia, the courts we know today as the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The history of these courts is complex, and sometimes enigmatic. Their names changed no fewer than six times since their creation; for some thirty years, from 1863 until 1893, the two courts existed as one umbrella tribunal, named the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.' The courts' location in the nation's capital and their dual jurisdiction as both federal and local forums rendered the District of Columbia courts unique tribunals destined to make substantial contributions to American jurisprudence. This Essay describes the evolution of these courts from a three-judge circuit court with both trial and appellate jurisdiction to the two courts whose 200th anniversary we celebrated this past year.2 It then examines two main themes characteristic of these unique tribunals.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island
    Case 1:20-cv-00302-WES-LDA Document 8 Filed 07/22/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ______________________________ ) FELIPE DUBON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 20-302 WES ) MERRICK GARLAND1, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 5. Plaintiff filed this instant action after Defendants denied his Form I-212 Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into the United States After Deportation or Removal. Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1. He asks that this Court compel Defendants to “re- adjudicate his Form I-212” as it was “improperly decided.” Id. Defendants move to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(3), and 12(b)6). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will GRANT the Defendants’ 12(b)(1) motion and dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and require a jurisdictional prerequisite, which “implicates a court’s 1 Merrick Garland is now the United States Attorney General. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland has been substituted for U.S. Attorney General William Barr as Defendant. Case 1:20-cv-00302-WES-LDA Document 8 Filed 07/22/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: <pageID> constitutional and statutory power to hear and resolve a case.” Alphas Co., Inc. v. William H. Kopke, Jr., Inc., 708 F.3d 33, 36 (1st Cir. 2013). It is the plaintiff’s burden to prove this jurisdictional prerequisite and establish that the court has subject matter jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Kdittmar Invisible Forces November Draft
    Invisible Forces: Gender, Race, and Congressional Staff Kelly Dittmar, Ph.D. Rutgers University – Camden Center for American Women and Politics, Rutgers University – New Brunswick **WORKING PAPER** 1 INTRODUCTION Forty years ago, Harrison Fox and Susan Hammond published a seminal book on congressional staff, calling staffers “the invisible force in American lawmaking.” They were not the first observers of congressional dynamics to note the often unseen and under-investigated role of professional staff on Capitol Hill, nor have they been the last. Just two years later, Michael Malbin (1980) published Unelected Representatives: Congressional Staff and the Future of Representative Government, seeking to make visible what he perceived as an underappreciated level of staff influence on the policy process. By the mid-1990s, however, Herbert and Karen Foerstel (1996) still characterized congressional staff as representing “the large and influential Capitol Hill infrastructure” that is “invisible to most of the public” (145). Staff remained largely invisible to scholars as well, central to only a handful of book-length publications over the past four decades (Fox and Hammond 1977; Malbin 1980; Pierce 2014; Jones 2017a). The dearth of research on congressional professionals stands in stark contrast to the increased professionalization of the nation’s top legislative institution. The “ever-increasing complexity of governing,” as the national policy agenda has become larger and more complicated, has required members of Congress to hire specialists able to assist them in navigating the new political realities of effective representation (Romzek and Utter 1997, 1251; see also Polsby 1969). The Legislative Reorganization Acts of 1946 and 1970 both increased manpower and encouraged specialization among staff and members, helping them to meet mounting legislative demands.
    [Show full text]
  • August 25, 2021 the Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General
    MARK BRNOVICH DAVE YOST ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL August 25, 2021 The Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Constitutionality of Illegal Reentry Criminal Statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Dear Attorney General Garland, We, the undersigned attorneys general, write as chief legal officers of our States to inquire about your intent to appeal the decision in United States v. Carrillo-Lopez, No. 3:20-cr- 00026-MMD-WGC, ECF. 60 (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2021). As you know, in that decision, Chief Judge Du found unconstitutional 8 U.S.C. § 1326, the statute that criminalizes the illegal reentry of previously removed aliens. We appreciate that you recently filed a notice of appeal, preserving your ability to defend the law on appeal. We now urge you to follow through by defending the law before the Ninth Circuit and (if necessary) the Supreme Court. We ask that you confirm expeditiously DOJ’s intent to do so. Alternatively, if you do not intend to seek reversal of that decision and instead decide to cease prosecutions for illegal reentry in some or all of the country, we ask that you let us know, in writing, so that the undersigned can take appropriate action. Section 1326, as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, is unremarkable in that it requires all aliens—no matter their race or country of origin—to enter the country lawfully. In finding the law racially discriminatory against “Latinx persons,” Chief Judge Du made some truly astounding claims, especially considering that, under the Immigration and Nationality Act, Mexico has more legal permanent residents in the United States, by far, than any other country.1 Chief Judge Du determined that, because most illegal reentrants at the border are from Mexico, the law has an impermissible “disparate impact” on Mexicans.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Right and Feed Everyone”
    “Do Right and Feed Everyone” U. S. AGRICULTURE SECRETARY SONNY PERDUE: YEAR ONE Sonny Perdue came by his knowledge of agriculture the old fashioned way: he was born into a farming family in Bonaire, Georgia. From childhood, and through his life in business and elected office, Perdue has experienced the industry from every possible perspective. Uniquely qualified as a former farmer, agribusinessman, veterinarian, state legislator, and governor of Georgia, he became the 31st United States Secretary of Agriculture on April 25, 2017. In his first year, Secretary Perdue and the USDA team made breakthroughs in agricultural trade, moved to reduce burdensome regulations, responded to natural disasters, and battled through the worst fire season on record, among other notable achievements. “As secretary, I will champion the concerns of farmers, ranchers, foresters, and producers, and will work tirelessly to solve the issues facing our farm families,” Secretary Perdue said. “I am proud to have been given this opportunity and look forward to rolling up my sleeves and getting to work as we continue to move the USDA and our nation forward.” Stakeholder Outreach Since being sworn in on April 25, 2017, Secretary Perdue has visited 35 states and six foreign countries, conducting outreach to rural and agricultural stakeholders promoting President Donald J. Trump’s agenda. Secretary Perdue's three "Back to Our Roots" RV Tours spanned across 11 states, covered over 3,000 miles, and touched countless people of American agriculture. "As always, our ‘Back to our Roots’ RV tours are opportunities to get out of Washington, D.C. to hear directly from the American people in the agriculture community,” Secretary Perdue said.
    [Show full text]