Liquid Baits Control Argentine Ants Sustainably in Coastal Vineyards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Liquid Baits Control Argentine Ants Sustainably in Coastal Vineyards UC Agriculture & Natural Resources California Agriculture Title Liquid baits control Argentine ants sustainably in coastal vineyards Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/64z229kw Journal California Agriculture, 62(4) ISSN 0008-0845 Authors Cooper, Monica L Daane, Kent M Nelson, Erik H et al. Publication Date 2008-10-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California REVIEW ARTICLE ▼ Liquid baits control Argentine ants sustainably in coastal vineyards by Monica L. Cooper, Kent M. Daane, Erik H. Nelson, Lucia G. Varela, Mark C. Battany, Wild Alex Neil D. Tsutsui and Michael K. Rust Liquid ant baits are an alterna- tive to broad-spectrum insecticide sprays conventionally used to con- trol Argentine ants. We review the development of liquid ant baits, which capitalize on the ants’ sugar- feeding requirements and social structure to deliver small doses of toxicant throughout the colony. The ant bait program described here, developed for commercial vine- yards, also has the potential to fa- cilitate the use of biological controls for mealybug and scale pests. The implementation of an Argentine ant bait program will enable grape growers to target other pests more selectively with insecticides, further contributing to their sustainable An Argentine ant tends an adult mealybug. A drop of honeydew, the sugar-rich viticulture practices. mealybug excretion, can be seen in the ant’s mouthparts. he Argentine ant is an invasive pest grape mealybug (Pseudococcus maritimus out the colony. We also discuss future that has spread throughout Cali- [Ehrhorn]), obscure mealybug (P. viburni avenues of study to further control forniaT since it was fi rst reported from [Signoret]) (Daane et al. 2007; Phillips Argentine ant populations. Ontario, Calif., in 1905. Though popu- and Sherk 1991) and vine mealybug Argentine ant biology larly recognized as a household pest (Planococcus fi cus [Signoret]), a particu- (Vega and Rust 2001), the Argentine ant larly severe pest that recently invaded In agricultural systems, Argentine (Linepithema humile [Mayr]) also causes California (Daane, Bentley, et al. 2006). ants are most commonly found in areas severe problems in natural systems by Mealybug feeding may partially defoli- with disturbed habitats and some soil displacing native ants and other insect ate vines, and crop damage results when moisture. Their nests are composed of species, and even some vertebrate and mealybugs infest bunches and excrete reproductive females (queens), sterile plant populations (Holway et al. 2002). honeydew, which promotes the growth females (workers), winged reproductive In addition, in agricultural systems the of sooty molds and bunch rots (Godfrey males and immature ants (eggs, larvae Argentine ant is associated with out- et al. 2002). Mealybugs also indirectly and pupae). Outside the species’ native breaks of phloem-feeding insects such damage vines by vectoring leafroll vi- range, the social structure and biology as mealybugs, scale and aphids, which ruses (Golino et al. 1999) (see page 156). of the Argentine ant have increased the ants protect from natural enemies; To reduce vineyard damage from its pest status. In its introduced range, in exchange, the ants collect the sugar- mealybugs and promote their biologi- Argentine ant nests are unicolonial, form- rich food source (honeydew) excreted cal control (see page 167), the Argentine ing massive “supercolonies” character- by the phloem-feeders (Buckley and ant must be suppressed. We review the ized by the absence of aggression among Gullan 1991). development of liquid ant baits, which workers across large geographic areas In California vineyards, the capitalize on the ants’ sugar-feeding (Tsutsui et al. 2000). The main European Argentine ant has been implicated in requirements and social structure to supercolony has been reported to extend outbreaks of three mealybugs species: deliver small doses of toxicant through- up to 3,700 miles (6,000 kilometers), en- http://CaliforniaAgriculture.ucop.edu • OctOBER–DEcEMBER 2008 177 sprays targeted at ants may disrupt represents no mealybugs; “1” represents Alex Wild Alex integrated pest management (IPM) 1 to 10 mealybugs and/or honeydew; programs by suppressing populations “2” represents more than 10 mealybugs, of beneficial insects. While these sprays sooty mold and/or honeydew; and “3” may also kill foraging ants, unlike baits represents heavily infested, unmarket- they have little effect on ants in nests able clusters. and so allow for an eventual resurgence Because most insecticides are not of the population (Klotz et al. 2002; Rust highly soluble in water, one of the major et al. 1996). challenges facing the study group was to find suitable toxicants that can be for- Developing liquid baits mulated into sugar water solutions. The Ant control in vineyards has been in- first vineyard trials were in 2000 and vestigated using granular protein baits 2001, and compared a no-bait control to for Formica species (Klotz et al. 2003; four liquid bait treatments: boric acid Argentine ants are aggressive and social. Above, Tollerup et al. 2004) and liquid sugar (0.5%), imidacloprid (0.0001%), fipronil three Argentine ants attack the native harvester baits for Argentine ants (Daane, Sime, (0.0001%) and thiamethoxam (0.0001%). ant (Pogonomyrmex subdentatus) en masse. et al. 2006; Daane et al. 2008; Nelson These initial trials showed little differ- and Daane 2007). The liquid bait trials ence between the no-bait control and compassing millions of nests and com- discussed here were conducted either the liquid bait treatments. prising billions of workers (Giraud et al. in Central Coast vineyards (San Luis However, valuable lessons were 2002). In the absence of aggression and Obispo, Santa Barbara and Monterey learned and applied to subsequent tri- territoriality, more resources can be di- counties) populated with obscure als, in which measurable differences rected to colony growth, the domination mealybug, or in North Coast vineyards were recorded among treatments of food and nesting resources, and the (Napa and Sonoma counties) populated (Daane, Sime, et al. 2006). First, bait sta- displacement of native ants in direct, ag- with grape mealybug. The initial liquid tions left in the field for longer than 3 gressive encounters (Holway et al. 1998). bait trials were conducted from 2000 to weeks, without the addition of preser- However, the ants’ biology can also 2002, based on methodologies devel- vative, fouled as the sugar fermented. be used against them. The Argentine oped for urban systems by Klotz et al. Second, unlike the urban systems ant diet is composed mainly of carbohy- (2002) and described in detail by Daane, tested, the vineyards had incredibly drates (sugars) in a liquid form, such as Sime, et al. (2006). large Argentine ant populations: up to honeydew (Rust et al. 2000). Therefore, In brief, the liquid baits were com- 1.2 ounces (35 grams) of sugar water while granular protein baits are not heav- posed of 25% sugar water laced with a per day were removed from monitor- ily foraged by Argentine ant workers, small dose of one of four different toxi- ing tubes, the equivalent of more than sugar water laced with insecticide is an cants, and were deployed in approxi- 100,000 ant visits! excellent method for delivering small but mately 250- to 500-milliliter containers In a later trial in 2002, researchers lethal amounts of toxicant to the colony placed on the ground or attached to refilled and cleaned the bait stations (Silverman and Roulston 2001). Liquid the vine trunk. Treatments were rep- every 2 weeks to reduce bait fermenta- baits exploit the social behavior of ants licated four to six times in large ex- tion, increased the distance between to distribute toxicant to colony members, perimental plots ranging from 0.25 to including larvae and queens (Silverman 0.5 acre (0.1 to 0.2 hectare) to account The ants’ biology can be and Roulston 2003). Argentine ants also for the movement of Argentine ants, used against them. use persistent trail pheromones to recruit which forage up to 150 feet from their colony members to food resources, result- nests (Ripa et al. 1999). ing in fidelity to bait-station locations Ant feeding activity was used to plots to keep the large ant population (Aron et al. 1989; Vega and Rust 2001). quantify ant densities and was based on from spilling over between treatment Because bait is exchanged among colony the amount of nontoxic sugar water ants plots, and increased the number of bait members via trophallaxis (i.e., ants feed- removed from 50-milliliter plastic tubes stations deployed from 35 per acre (85 ing other ants), baits have the potential (monitoring tubes). Sugar-water removal per hectare) to 65 to 250 per acre (160 to affect the nest population and provide rates are related to ant density because to 620 per hectare). The researchers season-long control (Forschler and Evans each milliliter removed represents ap- also used only one bait formulation 1994; Klotz et al. 2006). proximately 3,300 ant visits to the moni- (0.0001% thiamethoxam) and deployed Liquid baits reduce undesirable toring tube (Greenberg et al. 2006). bait stations earlier in the season to environmental impacts because they Mealybug densities were assessed take advantage of spring foraging require a relatively small amount of using 2.5-to-3-minute visual searches of activity. With these changes, research- insecticide, and the dispenser design randomly selected vines (timed counts),
Recommended publications
  • Diversity and Organization of the Ground Foraging Ant Faunas of Forest, Grassland and Tree Crops in Papua New Guinea
    - - -- Aust. J. Zool., 1975, 23, 71-89 Diversity and Organization of the Ground Foraging Ant Faunas of Forest, Grassland and Tree Crops in Papua New Guinea P. M. Room Department of Agriculture, Stock and Fisheries, Papua New Guinea; present address: Cotton Research Unit, CSIRO, P.M.B. Myallvale Mail Run, Narrabri, N.S.W. 2390. Abstract Thirty samples of ants were taken in each of seven habitats: primary forest, rubber plantation, coffee plantation, oilpalm plantation, kunai grassland, eucalypt savannah and urban grassland. Sixty samples were taken in cocoa plantations. A total of 156 species was taken, and the frequency of occurrence of each in each habitat is given. Eight stenoecious species are suggested as habitat indicators. Habitats fell into a series according to the similarity of their ant faunas: forest, rubber and coffee, cocoa and oilpalm, kunai and savannah, urban. This series represents an artificial, discontinuous succession from a complex stable ecosystem to a simple unstable one. Availability of species suitably preadapted to occupy habitats did not appear to limit species richness. Habitat heterogeneity and stability as affected by human interference did seem to account for inter-habitat variability in species richness. Species diversity was compared between habitats using four indices: Fisher et al.; Margalef; Shannon; Brillouin. Correlation of diversity index with habitat hetero- geneity plus stability was good for the first two, moderate for Shannon, and poor for Brillouin. Greatest diversity was found in rubber, the penultimate in the series of habitats according to hetero- geneity plus stability ('maturity'). Equitability exceeded the presumed maximum in rubber, and was close to the maximum in all habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae
    16 The Weta 30: 16-18 (2005) Changes to the classification of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Darren F. Ward School of Biological Sciences, Tamaki Campus, Auckland University, Private Bag 92019, Auckland ([email protected]) Introduction This short note aims to update the reader on changes to the subfamily classification of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Although the New Zealand ant fauna is very small, these changes affect the classification and phylogeny of both endemic and exotic ant species in New Zealand. Bolton (2003) has recently proposed a new subfamily classification for ants. Two new subfamilies have been created, a revised status for one, and new status for four. Worldwide, there are now 21 extant subfamilies of ants. The endemic fauna of New Zealand is now classified into six subfamilies (Table 1), as a result of three subfamilies, Amblyoponinae, Heteroponerinae and Proceratiinae, being split from the traditional subfamily Ponerinae. Bolton’s (2003) classification also affects several exotic species in New Zealand. Three species have been transferred from Ponerinae: Amblyopone australis to Amblyoponinae, and Rhytidoponera chalybaea and R. metallica to Ectatomminae. Currently there are 28 exotic species in New Zealand (Table 1). Eighteen species have most likely come from Australia, where they are native. Eight are global tramp species, commonly transported by human activities, and two species are of African origin. Nineteen of the currently established exotic species are recorded for the first time in New Zealand as occurring outside their native range. This may result in difficulty in obtaining species-specific biological knowledge and assessing their likelihood of becoming successful invaders. In addition to the work by Bolton (2003), Phil Ward and colleagues at UC Davis have started to resolve the phylogenetic relationships among subfamilies and genera of all ants using molecular data (Ward et al, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Linepithema Humile Global Invasive
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Linepithema humile Linepithema humile System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Formicidae Common name Argentinische Ameise (German), Argentine ant (English), formiga- Argentina (Portuguese, Brazil) Synonym Iridomyrmex humilis , (Mayr, 1868) Similar species Summary Linepithema humile (the Argentine ant) invades sub-tropical and temperate regions and is established on six continents. Introduced populations exhibit a different genetic and social makeup that confers a higher level of invasiveness (due to an increase in co- operation between workers in the colony). This allows the formation of fast growing, high density colonies, which place huge pressures on native ecosystems. For example, Linepithema humile is the greatest threat to the survival of various endemic Hawaiian arthropods and displaces native ant species around the world (some of which may be important seed-dispersers or plant-pollinators) resulting in a decrease in ant biodiversity and the disruption of native ecosystems. view this species on IUCN Red List Species Description Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) workers are monomorphic, displaying no physical differentiation (Holway et al. 2002a). The workers of this species are small, medium to dark brown ants, reaching 2 to 3mm in length. Body surface is smooth and shiny and lacks hairs on the dorsum of the head and thorax. The petiole is composed of a single, scale-like segment, and sting is absent. Workers are extremely fast moving and industrious, often recruiting in high numbers. Please click on AntWeb: Linepithema humile for more images and assistance with identification. The AntWeb image comparison tool lets you compare images of ants at the subfamily, genus, species or specimen level.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Species Recorded in the United Arab Emirates: an Initial List of Terrestrial and Freshwater Species
    Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 October 2015 | 7(12): 7910–7921 Data Paper Data Alien species recorded in the United Arab Emirates: an initial list of terrestrial and freshwater species ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) Pritpal Soorae 1, Salim Javed 2, Shaikha Al Dhaheri 3, Majid Al Qassimi 4, Maher Kabshawi 5, ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Anitha Saji 6, Shahid Khan 7, Sabitha Sakkir 8, Rashed Al Zaabi 9, Shakeel Ahmed 10, Junid N. Shah 11 & Ahmed Ali 12 OPEN ACCESS 1–12 Terrestrial Biodiversity Sector, Environment Agency-ABU DHABI, P.O. Box 45553, Abu Dhabi, UAE 1 [email protected] (corresponding author), 2 [email protected], 3 [email protected], 4 [email protected], 5 [email protected], 6 [email protected], 7 [email protected], 8 [email protected], 9 [email protected], 10 [email protected], 11 [email protected], 12 [email protected] Abstract: Little is documented on the alien terrestrial and freshwater species in the United Arab Emirates. To address this, an assessment of terrestrial and freshwater alien species was conducted using various techniques such as a questionnaire, fieldwork data, networking with relevant people, and a detailed literature review. The results of the initial assessment show that there are 146 alien species recorded in the following seven major taxonomic groups: invertebrates 49 species, freshwater fish five species, amphibian one species, reptiles six species, birds 71 species, mammals six species and plants eight species. To inform decision makers a full list of the 146 species identified in this assessment is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Predators: Ant- and Termite-Eating Mammals Acknowledgements
    The forgotten predators: ant- and termite-eating mammals Acknowledgements Patchy Ubiquitous Prof. William Bond (ideas); Prof. Mark Robertson; Prof. Kate Parr and Dr. Paul Eggleton top-down bottom-up “Population density (of ants) is constrained by kinds of food and nest sites, as well as by predation.” “Predators, especially visually searching vertebrate predators, play a key role ... rivalling the maximization of net energetic yield as a natural selection factor.” Holldobler and Wilson. 1990. The Ants. 113 3 1 leaf-cutter ant nest size control exclosure Hirsch et al., 2014 1 VERY LARGE LARGE MEDIUM SMALL Hirsch et al., 2014 Terborgh et al., 2001 2 Terborgh et al., 2001 Trophic Cascade 2 Chinese Pangolin Nine-banded Armadillo Common Echidna Giant Anteater Aardvark Orycteropus afer Redford (1987) 216 extant species cross-continental comparison Our database (2019) 291 extant + 40 extinct species = 331 extinct mammals extant extinct # of species mass (kg) ANT DEFENCE AGAINST MAMMALS 1. Bites & Stings 2. Nest Design 3. Flight Response 2. NEST DESIGN Predator Digging Depth 0.18m Echidna Numbat Opiang, 2009 2.25m Aardvark Pangolin Aardwolf Taylor & Skinner, 2003 Milewski et al., 1994 Echidna Numbat Tschinkel, 2004; 2011 Nest design where predators only scratch the surface? Aardvark Pangolin Aardwolf Tschinkel, 2004; 2011 Nest design where predators are large and dig deep? FORMICINE DOLICHODERINE Anoplolepis custodiens Iridomyrmex purpureus 40cm 400cm Longitudinal section through A.custodiens nest on the island of Zanzibar Ettershank, 1968 TERMITE DEFENCE AGAINST MAMMALS 1. Mound Hardness 2. Soldier 3. Digging Morphology distance to the queen 1. MOUND HARDNESS Echidna Giant Anteater 50 x harder than soil at the base Cornitermes cumulans Negret and Redford CONCLUSIONS different 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Iridomyrmex Purpureus, and Its Taxonomic Significance
    4 ¿l 'lcl GENETIC STUDIES OF MEAT A}ITS (tazaouvaunx PunPuaws) . by R, B. Hallida/, B.Sc.(Hons.) Department of Genetics University of Adelaide. A thesis subnitted to the University of Adelaide for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in May, 1978' TABLE QF 'CONTENTS Page SUMMARY i DECLARATION ].V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION I CHAPTER 2 ECOLOGY AND SYSTET{ATICS OF MEAT A¡ITS 4 2,L Taxonomic background 4 2.2 Appearance of colour forms 7 2.3 Geographic distribution 10 2.4 Interactions between colour fonts T2 2.5 Mating and colony founding 15 2.6 Nest structure T7 2.7 Colony and popu3..ation structure 20 2.8 General biology and pest status 24 ?o 0verview 28 CHAPTER J MATERIALS AND METHODS 29 3 I Populations sanpled 29 3 2 Collection nethods 38 3.3 Sanple preparation 59 3.4 Electrophoresis nethods 40 3.5 Gel staining nethods 42 3.6 Chronosome nethods 47 CHAPTER 4 POLYMORPHISM AT TÍ{Ë AMYT,ASE LOCUS 48 4.L The phenotypes and their inheritance 48 4.2 Estination of gene frequencies 51 4.3 Geographic variation within forms 56 4.4 Differences anong forrns 58 POLYMORPHISM AT THE ESTERÄSE=] LOCUS 61 The phenotypes and their inheritance 6L Estination of gene frequencies 63 Within and between fo::rn variation 65 Discussion 67 CHAPTER 6 OTHER ISOZYME LQCI IN MEAT ANTS 69 6.1 Aldehgde. oxÍdase 69 6.2 Esüerase-2 70 6.3 Esterase:3 72 6.4 General protein 74 6.s G Tuco se*6 -.p/:o sphate dehgdrog enase 75 6.6 G Tutamate dehgclrogenase 76 6.7 Lactate dehgdrogenase 77 6.8 Leucíne amÍnopeptÌdase 78 6.9 I{alate dehgdrogenase 79 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Animal Behavior
    Proceedings: 9th Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference 1969 Komarek, E.v. 1969. Fire and animal behavior. Pages 160-207 in E.V. Komarek (conference chariman). Proceedings Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference: No.9. Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference. 9. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL. Fire and Animal Behavior E. V. KOMAREK, SR. Tall Ti'mbers Researcb Station Tallabassee, Florida , THE REACTIONS and relationships of animals to fire, the charcoal black burn, the straw-colored and later the green vegetation certainly attracted the attention of primitive man and his ancestors. In "Fire-and the Ecology of iV'lan" I proposed that man himself is the product of a fire environment-"pre-'man prirrtates as well as early Ulan inhabited fire environrnents and had to be 'fire­ selected' ... to live in such environments." (Komarek, 1967). Therefore, man's ultimate survival, as had been true with other ani­ mals that live in fire environments, depends upon a proper under­ standing of fire and the relationships of animals and plants to this element. 1V10dern literature, particularly in the United States, has been so saturated with the reputed dangers of forest fires to animals that he has developed a deep seated fear of all fires in nature. In this nation, the average individual is only beginning to realize the proper place of fire and fire control in forest, grassland and field. Unfortunately, much knowledge on fire and animal behavior that was common in­ formation to the American Indian, pioneers, and early farm and ranch people has been lost though in some parts of the ·world a large body of this knowledge still exists.
    [Show full text]
  • ANONYCHOMYRMA Anguliceps. Iridomyrmex Anguliceps Forel, 1901B: 18 (Q.M.) NEW GUINEA (Papua New Guinea: Bismarck Archipelago)
    ANONYCHOMYRMA anguliceps. Iridomyrmex anguliceps Forel, 1901b: 18 (q.m.) NEW GUINEA (Papua New Guinea: Bismarck Archipelago). Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 13. Status as species: Dahl, 1901: 13; Forel, 1911e: 283; Emery, 1913a: 24; Wheeler, W.M. 1935g: 35; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 188; Shattuck, 1994: 3; Bolton, 1995b: 66. angusta. Iridomyrmex angustus Stitz, 1911a: 369, fig. 15 (w.) NEW GUINEA (Papua New Guinea). Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 13. Status as species: Chapman & Capco, 1951: 188; Shattuck, 1994: 4; Bolton, 1995b: 66. arcadia. Iridomyrmex arcadius Forel, 1915b: 82 (q.) AUSTRALIA (Queensland). Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 13. Status as species: Taylor & Brown, 1985: 96; Taylor, 1987a: 31; Shattuck, 1994: 4; Bolton, 1995b: 66. ballaratensis. Iridomyrmex itinerans var. ballaratensis Forel, 1902h: 472 (w.m.) AUSTRALIA (Victoria). Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 13. Subspecies of itinerans: Emery, 1913a: 25; Taylor & Brown, 1985: 100; Taylor, 1987a: 32; Shattuck, 1994: 6; Bolton, 1995b: 66. batesi. Iridomyrmex scrutator subsp. batesi Forel, 1911e: 283 (w.) NEW GUINEA (no state data). Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 14. Subspecies of scrutator: Stitz, 1912: 509; Emery, 1913a: 26; Donisthorpe, 1941h: 60; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 191; Shattuck, 1994: 8; Bolton, 1995b: 66. biconvexa. Iridomyrmex biconvexus Santschi, 1928e: 471 (w.) AUSTRALIA (Victoria). [Misspelled as triconvexus by Baroni Urbani, 1977e: 76.] Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 13. Status as species: Brown, 1954i: 67; Taylor & Brown, 1985: 97; Taylor, 1987a: 31; Shattuck, 1994: 4; Bolton, 1995b: 66. Senior synonym of foetans: Brown, 1954i: 67; Taylor & Brown, 1985: 97; Taylor, 1987a: 31; Shattuck, 1994: 4; Bolton, 1995b: 66. contenta. Iridomyrmex dimorphus subsp. contenta Viehmeyer, 1913: 146 (w., in copal) INDONESIA (Sulawesi).
    [Show full text]
  • Ants and Termites Increase Crop Yield in a Dry Climate
    ARTICLE Received 8 Oct 2010 | Accepted 24 Feb 2011 | Published 29 Mar 2011 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1257 Ants and termites increase crop yield in a dry climate Theodore A. Evans1, Tracy Z. Dawes2, Philip R. Ward3 & Nathan Lo4 Agricultural intensification has increased crop yields, but at high economic and environmental cost. Harnessing ecosystem services of naturally occurring organisms is a cheaper but under-appreciated approach, because the functional roles of organisms are not linked to crop yields, especially outside the northern temperate zone. Ecosystem services in soil come from earthworms in these cooler and wetter latitudes; what may fulfill their functional role in agriculture in warmer and drier habitats, where they are absent, is unproven. Here we show in a field experiment that ants and termites increase wheat yield by 36% from increased soil water infiltration due to their tunnels and improved soil nitrogen. Our results suggest that ants and termites have similar functional roles to earthworms, and that they may provide valuable ecosystem services in dryland agriculture, which may become increasingly important for agricultural sustainability in arid climates. 1 CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Clunies Ross Street, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2600, Australia. 2 CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Vandelin Drive, Darwin, Northern Territory 0821, Australia. 3 CSIRO Plant Industry, Underwood Avenue, Perth, Western Australia 6014, Australia. 4 Behaviour and Genetics of Social Insects Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.A.E. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2:262 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1257 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Mackay Whitsunday, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Santa Cruz Island, California
    Bull. Southern California Acad. Sei. 99(1), 2000, pp. 25-31 © Southern California Academy of Sciences, 2000 Ants (Hymenoptera: Formiddae) of Santa Cruz Island, California James K. Wetterer', Philip S. Ward^, Andrea L. Weiterer', John T. Longino^, James C. Träger^ and Scott E. Miller' ^Center for Environmental Research and Conservation, 1200 Amsterdam Ave., Columbia University, New York, New York 10027 ^Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 ^The Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington 98505 '^Shaw Arboretum, P.O. Box 38, Gray Summit, Missouri 63039 ^International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya and National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 Abstract.•^We conducted ant surveys on Santa Cruz Island, the largest of the CaUfomia Channel Islands, in 1975/6, 1984, 1993, and 1998. Our surveys yielded a combined total of 34 different ant species: Brachymyrmex cf. depilis, Campon- otus anthrax, C. clarithorax, C. hyatti, C. semitestaceus, C. vicinus, C. sp. near vicinus, C yogi, Cardiocondyla ectopia, Crematogaster califomica, C héspera, C. marioni, C. mormonum, Dorymyrmex bicolor, D. insanus (s.l.), Formica la- sioides, F. moki, Hypoponera opacior, Leptothorax andrei, L. nevadensis, Line- pithema humile, Messor chamberlini, Monomorium ergatogyna, Pheidole califor- nica, P. hyatti, Pogonomyrmex subdentatus, Polyergus sp., Prenolepis imparis, Pseudomyrmex apache, Solenopsis molesta (s.l.), Stenamma diecki, S. snellingi, S. cf. diecki, and Tapinoma sessile. The ant species form a substantial subset of the mainland California ant fauna. "We found only two ant species that are not native to North America, C ectopia and L. humile. Linepithema humile, the Ar- gentine ant, is a destructive tramp ant that poses a serious threat to native ants.
    [Show full text]
  • Jennings and Hayes 1994.Pdf
    AMPHIBIAN AND REPTILE SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN IN CALIFORNIA Mark R. Jennings Research Associate Department of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94118-9961 and Marc P. Hayes Research Associate Department of Biology, Portland State University P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751 and Research Section, Animal Management Division, Metro Washington Park Zoo 4001 Canyon Road, Portland, OR 97221-2799 The California Department of Fish and Game commissioned this study as part of the Inland Fisheries Division Endangered Species Project. Specific recommendations from this study and in this report are made as options by the authors for the Department to consider. These recommendations do not necessarily represent the findings, opinions, or policies of the Department. FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME INLAND FISHERIES DIVISION 1701 NIMBUS ROAD RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95701 UNDER CONTRACT NUMBER 8023 1994 Jennings and Hayes: Species of Special Concern i Date of Submission: December 8, 1993 Date of Publication: November 1, 1994 Jennings and Hayes: Species of Special Concern ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT . 1 PREFACE . 3 INTRODUCTION . 4 METHODS . 5 RESULTS . 11 CALIFORNIA TIGER SALAMANDER . 12 INYO MOUNTAINS SALAMANDER . 16 RELICTUAL SLENDER SALAMANDER . 18 BRECKENRIDGE MOUNTAIN SLENDER SALAMANDER . 20 YELLOW-BLOTCHED SALAMANDER . 22 LARGE-BLOTCHED SALAMANDER . 26 MOUNT LYELL SALAMANDER . 28 OWENS VALLEY WEB-TOED SALAMANDER . 30 DEL NORTE SALAMANDER . 32 SOUTHERN SEEP SALAMANDER . 36 COAST RANGE NEWT . 40 TAILED FROG . 44 COLORADO RIVER TOAD . 48 YOSEMITE TOAD . 50 ARROYO TOAD . 54 NORTHERN RED-LEGGED FROG . 58 CALIFORNIA RED-LEGGED FROG . 62 FOOTHILL YELLOW-LEGGED FROG .
    [Show full text]