DOCSLIB.ORG

Design and Analysis of a Four Wheeled Planetary Rover

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design and Analysis of a Four Wheeled Planetary Rover UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE Design and Analysis of a Four Wheeled Planetary Rover A Thesis SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By Matthew J. Roman Norman, Oklahoma 2005 Design and Analysis of a Four Wheeled Planetary Rover A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE SCHOOL OF AEROSPACE & MECHANICAL ENGINEERING By Prof. David P. Miller Prof. Kuang-Hua Chang Prof. Dean Hougen c by Matthew J. Roman 2005 All Rights Reserved. Acknowledgements I would like to thank David Miller and the remaining faculty in the college of engi- neering for their helpful advice. They have directed the path I’m on toward a future that I dream of. Thanks to Malin Space Science Systems for providing the funds for this project. Thank you to all of my friends who have made sure that I learn from life outside the lab as well. Most importantly thanks to my family and their never-ending support. I could not have gone so far without such loving parents, Thank you Mom and Dad. iv Contents Acknowledgements iv List Of Tables viii List Of Figures ix Abstract xi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Rovers for Exploration . 2 1.2 Rover Suspension Systems . 4 1.2.1 Independant Spring Suspension . 5 1.2.2 Articulated Body Suspension . 7 1.2.3 Rocker-Bogie Suspension . 10 1.2.4 Four Wheel Suspensions . 17 1.2.5 Legged Suspension . 18 1.3 Design Goals for Mars Rovers . 25 1.4 Terrain and Environment . 26 1.5 Four vs. Six wheels . 29 1.5.1 Are six wheels overkill? . 29 1.5.2 Why 4 wheels? . 32 1.6 Organization of Thesis . 34 2 Solar Rover-II Mechanical System 36 2.1 SR-II design goals . 37 2.2 Main Body . 38 v 2.3 Drive Train . 44 2.3.1 Wheel torque . 45 2.3.2 Mobility Power Requirements . 47 2.3.3 Motors . 49 2.3.4 Drive Train Concepts . 53 2.3.5 Motor Selection . 57 2.3.6 Power Transfer . 60 2.4 Suspension . 64 2.4.1 Central Differential . 64 2.4.2 Structure . 67 2.5 Wheels . 72 2.6 Electronics . 73 2.6.1 Sensors . 74 2.6.1.1 Obstacle Avoidance . 74 2.6.1.2 Tilt,Roll, and Heading . 75 2.6.1.3 Odometry . 75 2.6.2 Power . 76 2.6.2.1 Solar Panel . 76 2.6.2.2 Batteries . 76 2.7 Control System . 77 2.8 Construction . 78 3 Experimental Setup and Procedure 79 3.1 Rover Field Test . 80 3.1.1 Location and Terrain features . 81 3.1.2 Rover Setup . 81 3.1.3 Experiment Results . 83 3.2 Rover Laboratory Experiment . 87 3.2.1 Obstacle Traversing . 88 3.2.2 Slope . 90 3.2.3 Driving Power . 91 4 Results and Lessons Learned 93 vi Reference List 96 Appendix A Data Calculations . 103 Appendix B Mechanical Drawings . 117 vii List Of Tables 3.1 SR-II power used while maneuvering over various surfaces . 91 viii List Of Figures 1.1 Lunokhod, Russian for ”Moon Walker” (image reproduced from NASA) 4 1.2 Blue Rover and Robby are articulated body rovers designed by NASA(image reproduced from NASA) ......................... 7 1.3 Russian built Marsokhod (image reproduced from NASA) . 8 1.4 NASA’s Pathfinder rover on the 1997 mission and one of the twin Mars Exploration Rovers in 2004 (images reproduced from NASA) . 10 1.5 Link style mobility systems (images reproduced from NASA) . 12 1.6 Rocky Rover series (images reproduced from NASA) .......... 14 1.7 Changing direction ............................ 16 1.8 Sandia National Labs’ Ratler rover and Nomad rover (images repro- duced from [45] and NASA) ....................... 18 1.9 Ambler, a walking rover with a circulating gait and Dante, a frame walking rover (image reproduced from [8, 6]) .............. 19 1.10 Genghis and Attila biologically inspired hexapod robots (image repro- duced from MIT AI lab) ......................... 22 1.11 Rhex simplified leg design for a walking robot (image reproduced from [36]) .................................... 23 1.12 Qrio, a humanoid robot and Yambo-III a simplified biped robot (image reproduced from Sony corp. and [41]) .................. 24 1.13 Viking 2 landing site (image reproduced from NASA) ......... 27 1.14 Pathfinder landing site (image reproduced from NASA) . 28 1.15 MER Opportunity landing site (image reproduced from NASA) . 28 1.16 Sojourner climbing rocks (image reproduced from NASA) . 30 1.17 Four wheeled Solar Rover-II ....................... 33 ix 2.1 Solar Rover-II body and solar panel ................... 40 2.2 Honeycomb constructed body with the reinforced plate to which the geared differential housing is mounted .................. 42 2.3 wheel torque free body diagram ...................... 46 2.4 SR-II with motors in place ........................ 52 2.5 Belt drive with tensioning pulleys .................... 53 2.6 Chain and Sprocket drive with idler sprockets .............. 54 2.7 Drive train concepts using bevel gears and drive shafts ......... 57 2.8 Dual output bevel gear set and planetary drive ............. 60 2.9 Lower bevel gear set and wheel axle ................... 62 2.10 Cross section of SR-II’s hollow wheel axle ................ 63 2.11 Central gear differential mounted to the center of the body . 66 2.12 Tubular suspension structure ....................... 67 2.13 Central differential and motor mounting inside the body . 68 2.14 Upper gear box housing .......................... 69 2.15 Lower gear box housing (front) ...................... 71 2.16 Lower gear box housing (back) ...................... 71 2.17 Sharp infrared range finding sensor ................... 74 3.1 SR-II near the Salton Sea during the field test ............. 80 3.2 SR-II thermal delamination of the wheel ................ 85 3.3 SR-II position data taken during the field test ............. 86 3.4 Laboratory rover setup .......................... 87 3.5 SR-II climbing over a bump obstacle .................. 88 3.6 SR-II climbing over a step obstacle ................... 89 3.7 SR-II climbing a wooden plank slope ................... 90 3.8 SR-II outdoor slope test ......................... 91 x Abstract Rovers are important for conducting in-situ scientific analysis of objectives that are separated by many meters to tens of kilometers. Current mobility designs are complex, using many wheels or legs. They are open to mechanical failure caused by the harsh environment on Mars. This thesis describes Solar Rover-II, a four wheeled rover capable of traversing rough terrain using an efficient high degree of mobility suspension system. The primary mechanical feature of the SR-II design is its drive train simplicity, which is accomplished by using only two motors for mobility. Both motors are located inside the body where thermal variation is kept to a minimum, increasing reliability and efficiency. Four wheels are used because there are few obstacles on natural terrain that require both front wheels of the rover to climb simultaneously. A series of mobility experiments in the Southern California desert concluded that SR-II can achieve greater than 1km traverses in Mars like terrain during the six hours of peak solar energy per day. xi Chapter 1 Introduction Mobile robotic vehicles can be sent to an unknown surface and withstand the deadly environment of space with a much lower price tag and expenditure than a manned mission. The Russians landed two robotic vehicles on the moon and two more on Mars during the 1970’s, another three from NASA have landed on Mars since then. The rovers, Lunokhod 1 and 2 were able to explore regions further from the landing site and spend more time on the moon than a manned mission could have during that time. The two Russian Mars missions failed before achieving any science goals. In 1997 the Mars Pathfinder mission landed a small rover named Sojourner to explore the surface of the red planet. Two more rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, landed on opposite sides of Mars in January 2004 during the Mars Exploration Rover mission (MER). The Pathfinder and MER missions cost approximately $265 and $820 million 1 respectively, which is much cheaper than the $80 billion to $1 trillion estimates for landing a man on Mars. The rovers have the capability to conduct many science experiments in the area that they landed. Sojourner surveyed the area within about 10m radius around its lander, larger than the 3m reach of the arm on one side of the Mars Viking Landers. The MER rovers explored more than 5km away from their landers, which is equivalent to the average distance the lunar rover was driven away from the landing module during the Apollo program. These robotic missions have verified that remote science can be accomplished on the surface of another planet with a high degree of success. They allow access to areas of interest on the surface instead of being confined to the local area around the lander. 1.1 Rovers for Exploration The idea of sending a rover to the surface of another planet is to allow earth bound scientist’s access to specific areas of interest without enduring the harsh environ- ments of space [50]. The rover carries instruments to various terrestrial formations 2 for in-situ experimentation. The goal of the rover is to move between areas of inter- est quickly and safely. In order to better represent the planet of interest the rover must be able to travel tens of kilometers. Rovers designed for the exploration of other planets have had very complex mo- bility systems using large numbers of wheels or legs and sometimes multiple bodies. Two specific types of rovers have been to the surface of another planet: the Lunokhod rovers using an eight wheel design and three Mars rovers using the six wheel rocker bogie suspension.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Journey to Mars: How Donna Shirley Broke Barriers for Women in Space Engineering
    The Journey to Mars: How Donna Shirley Broke Barriers for Women in Space Engineering Laurel Mossman, Kate Schein, and Amelia Peoples Senior Division Group Documentary Word Count: 499 Our group chose the topic, Donna Shirley and her Mars rover, because of our connections and our interest level in not only science but strong, determined women. One of our group member’s mothers worked for a man under Ms. Shirley when she was developing the Mars rover. This provided us with a connection to Ms. Shirley, which then gave us the amazing opportunity to interview her. In addition, our group is interested in the philosophy of equality and we have continuously created documentaries that revolve around this idea. Every member of our group is a female, so we understand the struggles and discrimination that women face in an everyday setting and wanted to share the story of a female that faced these struggles but overcame them. Thus after conducting a great amount of research, we fell in love with Donna Shirley’s story. Lastly, it was an added benefit that Ms. Shirley is from Oklahoma, making her story important to our state. All of these components made this topic extremely appealing to us. We conducted our research using online articles, Donna Shirley’s autobiography, “Managing Martians”, news coverage from the launch day, and our interview with Donna ​ ​ Shirley. We started our research process by reading Shirley’s autobiography. This gave us insight into her college life, her time working at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and what it was like being in charge of such a barrier-breaking mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp
    Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp AIAA Space Mission System 2019-2020 Virginia Tech Aerospace Engineering Faculty Advisor : Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Team Members : Olivia Arthur, Bobby Aselford, Michel Becker, Patrick Crandall, Heidi Engebreth, Maedini Jayaprakash, Logan Lark, Nico Ortiz, Matthew Pieczynski, Brendan Ventura Member AIAA Number Member AIAA Number And Signature And Signature Faculty Advisor 25807 Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Brendan Ventura 1109196 Matthew Pieczynski 936900 Team Lead/Operations Logan Lark 902106 Heidi Engebreth 1109232 Structures & Environment Patrick Crandall 1109193 Olivia Arthur 999589 Power & Thermal Maedini Jayaprakash 1085663 Robert Aselford 1109195 CCDH/Operations Michel Becker 1109194 Nico Ortiz 1109533 Attitude, Trajectory, Orbits and Launch Vehicles Contents 1 Symbols and Acronyms 8 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Preface and Introduction 13 3.1 Project Management . 13 3.2 Problem Definition . 14 3.2.1 Background and Motivation . 14 3.2.2 RFP and Description . 14 3.2.3 Project Scope . 15 3.2.4 Disciplines . 15 3.2.5 Societal Sectors . 15 3.2.6 Assumptions . 16 3.2.7 Relevant Capital and Resources . 16 4 Value System Design 17 4.1 Introduction . 17 4.2 Analytical Hierarchical Process . 17 4.2.1 Longevity . 18 4.2.2 Expandability . 19 4.2.3 Scientific Return . 19 4.2.4 Risk . 20 4.2.5 Cost . 21 5 Initial Concept of Operations 21 5.1 Orbital Analysis . 22 5.2 Launch Vehicles . 22 6 Habitat Location 25 6.1 Introduction . 25 6.2 Region Selection . 25 6.3 Locations of Interest . 26 6.4 Eliminated Locations . 26 6.5 Remaining Locations . 27 6.6 Chosen Location .
    [Show full text]
  • AI, Robots, and Swarms: Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies
    AI, Robots, and Swarms Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies Andrew Ilachinski January 2017 Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Distribution Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N00014-11-D-0323. Copies of this document can be obtained through the Defense Technical Information Center at www.dtic.mil or contact CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Photography Credits: http://www.darpa.mil/DDM_Gallery/Small_Gremlins_Web.jpg; http://4810-presscdn-0-38.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/ Robotics.jpg; http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-edia/image/upload/18kxb5jw3e01ujpg.jpg Approved by: January 2017 Dr. David A. Broyles Special Activities and Innovation Operations Evaluation Group Copyright © 2017 CNA Abstract The military is on the cusp of a major technological revolution, in which warfare is conducted by unmanned and increasingly autonomous weapon systems. However, unlike the last “sea change,” during the Cold War, when advanced technologies were developed primarily by the Department of Defense (DoD), the key technology enablers today are being developed mostly in the commercial world. This study looks at the state-of-the-art of AI, machine-learning, and robot technologies, and their potential future military implications for autonomous (and semi-autonomous) weapon systems. While no one can predict how AI will evolve or predict its impact on the development of military autonomous systems, it is possible to anticipate many of the conceptual, technical, and operational challenges that DoD will face as it increasingly turns to AI-based technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Mars 2020 Perseverance Rover Gets Balanced 21 April 2020
    NASA's Mars 2020 Perseverance rover gets balanced 21 April 2020 minimize friction that could affect the accuracy of the results, the table's surface sits on a spherical air bearing that essentially levitates on a thin layer of nitrogen gas. To determine center of gravity relative to the rover's z-axis (which extends from the bottom of the rover through the top) and y-axis (from the rover's left to right side), the team slowly rotated the vehicle back and forth, calculating the imbalance in its mass distribution. NASA's Perseverance rover is moved during a test of its mass properties at Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The image was taken on April 7, 2020. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech With 13 weeks to go before the launch period of NASA's Mars 2020 Perseverance rover opens, final preparations of the spacecraft continue at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida. On April 8, the This image of the Perseverance Mars rover was taken at assembly, test and launch operations team NASA's Kennedy Space Center on April 7, 2020, during a completed a crucial mass properties test of the test of the vehicle's mass properties. Credit: NASA/JPL- rover. Caltech Precision mass properties measurements are essential to a safe landing on Mars because they help ensure that the spacecraft travels accurately Just as an auto mechanic places small weights on throughout its trip to the Red Planet—from launch a car tire's rim to bring it into balance, the through its entry, descent and landing. Perseverance team analyzed the data and then added 13.8 pounds (6.27 kilograms) to the rover's On April 6, the meticulous three-day process chassis.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Range Rovers for Mars Exploration and Sample Return
    2001-01-2138 Long-Range Rovers for Mars Exploration and Sample Return Joe C. Parrish NASA Headquarters ABSTRACT This paper discusses long-range rovers to be flown as part of NASA’s newly reformulated Mars Exploration Program (MEP). These rovers are currently scheduled for launch first in 2007 as part of a joint science and technology mission, and then again in 2011 as part of a planned Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission. These rovers are characterized by substantially longer range capability than their predecessors in the 1997 Mars Pathfinder and 2003 Mars Exploration Rover (MER) missions. Topics addressed in this paper include the rover mission objectives, key design features, and Figure 1: Rover Size Comparison (Mars Pathfinder, Mars Exploration technologies. Rover, ’07 Smart Lander/Mobile Laboratory) INTRODUCTION NASA is leading a multinational program to explore above, below, and on the surface of Mars. A new The first of these rovers, the Smart Lander/Mobile architecture for the Mars Exploration Program has Laboratory (SLML) is scheduled for launch in 2007. The recently been announced [1], and it incorporates a current program baseline is to use this mission as a joint number of missions through the rest of this decade and science and technology mission that will contribute into the next. Among those missions are ambitious plans directly toward sample return missions planned for the to land rovers on the surface of Mars, with several turn of the decade. These sample return missions may purposes: (1) perform scientific explorations of the involve a rover of almost identical architecture to the surface; (2) demonstrate critical technologies for 2007 rover, except for the need to cache samples and collection, caching, and return of samples to Earth; (3) support their delivery into orbit for subsequent return to evaluate the suitability of the planet for potential manned Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Aircraft Design
    Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Science Fen Bilimleri Dergisi (CFD), Cilt:36, No: 3 Özel Sayı (2015) Science Journal (CSJ), Vol. 36, No: 3 Special Issue (2015) ISSN: 1300-1949 ISSN: 1300-1949 SOLAR AIRCRAFT DESIGN Sadegh RAHMATI1,*, Amir GHASED2 1,2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Majlesi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran Received: 01.02.2015; Accepted: 05.05.2015 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract. Generally domain Aircraft uses conventional fuel. These fuel having limited life, high cost and pollutant. Also nowadays price of petrol and other fuels are going to be higher, because of scarcity of those fuels. So there is great demand of use of non-exhaustible unlimited source of energy like solar energy. Solar aircraft is one of the ways to utilize solar energy. Solar aircraft uses solar panel to collect the solar radiation for immediate use but it also store the remaining part for the night flight. This paper intended to stimulate research on renewable energy sources for aviation. In future solar powered air planes could be used for different types of aerial momitoring and unmanned flights. This review paper brietly shows history, application and use of solar aircraft. We are focusing on design and fabrication of solar aircraft which is unmanned prototype. Keywords: Solar energy, Reynolds number, Bernoulli’s principle 1. INTRODUCTION Energy comes in different forms. Light is a form of energy. Sun is source of energy called “sunlight”. Sunshine is free and never gets used up Also. There is a lot of it. The sunlight that heats the Earth in an hour has more energy than the people of the world use in a year.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Art of Piloted Electric Airplanes, NASA's Centennial Challenge Data and Fundamental Design Implications
    Dissertations and Theses Fall 2011 State of the Art of Piloted Electric Airplanes, NASA's Centennial Challenge Data and Fundamental Design Implications Lori Anne Costello Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/edt Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Costello, Lori Anne, "State of the Art of Piloted Electric Airplanes, NASA's Centennial Challenge Data and Fundamental Design Implications" (2011). Dissertations and Theses. 37. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/37 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STATE OF THE ART OF PILOTED ELECTRIC AIRPLANES, NASA’S CENTENNIAL CHALLENGE DATA AND FUNDAMENTAL DESIGN IMPLICATIONS by Lori Anne Costello A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Studies Office in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida Fall 2011 1 Copyright by Lori Anne Costello 2011 All Rights Reserved 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis is the culmination of two years of work on the Green Flight Challenge Eco-Eagle. The Eco- Eagle and this thesis would not have been possible without countless help and inspiration from friends and family. I would like to thank Dr. Anderson for giving me the opportunity to participate in Embry-Riddle’s Green Flight Challenge Team and for supporting me and the Eco-Eagle project. Without his guidance I would not have this paper and understood as much as I now do about electric airplanes.
    [Show full text]
  • 350 International Atlas of Lunar Exploration 8 January 1973
    :UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 350 [7428] 19.8.20073:28PM 350 International Atlas of Lunar Exploration 8 January 1973: Luna 21 and Lunokhod 2 (Soviet Union) The 4850 kg Luna 21 spacecraft was launched from Baikonur at 06:56 UT on a Proton booster, placed in a low Earth parking orbit and then put on a lunar trajec­ tory. Power problems required that the Lunokhod solar panel be opened in flight to augment power, and stowed again for the trajectory correction and orbit insertion burns and for landing. On 12 January Luna 21 entered a 90 km by 100 km lunar orbit inclined 60° to the equator. After a day in orbit the low point was reduced to 16 km, and on 15 January after 40 orbits the vehicle braked and dropped to just 750 m above the surface. Then the main thrusters slowed the descent, and at :UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 351 [7428] 19.8.20073:28PM Chronological sequence of missions and events 351 22 m a set of secondary thrusters took over until the After landing, Lunokhod 2 surveyed its surround­ spacecraft was only 1.5 meters high, when the thrusters ings. A rock partly blocked the west-facing ramp so the were shut off. Landing time was 23:35 UT. rover was driven east across a shallow crater, leaving the The site was in Le Monnier crater on the eastern edge lander at 01:14 UT on 16 January. It rested 30 m from of Mare Serenitatis, 180 km north of the Apollo 17 land­ the descent stage to recharge its batteries until 18 ing site, at 25.85° N, 30.45° E (Figure 327A).
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Science Laboratory: Curiosity Rover Curiosity’S Mission: Was Mars Ever Habitable? Acquires Rock, Soil, and Air Samples for Onboard Analysis
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mars Science Laboratory: Curiosity Rover www.nasa.gov Curiosity’s Mission: Was Mars Ever Habitable? acquires rock, soil, and air samples for onboard analysis. Quick Facts Curiosity is about the size of a small car and about as Part of NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory mission, Launch — Nov. 26, 2011 from Cape Canaveral, tall as a basketball player. Its large size allows the rover Curiosity is the largest and most capable rover ever Florida, on an Atlas V-541 to carry an advanced kit of 10 science instruments. sent to Mars. Curiosity’s mission is to answer the Arrival — Aug. 6, 2012 (UTC) Among Curiosity’s tools are 17 cameras, a laser to question: did Mars ever have the right environmental Prime Mission — One Mars year, or about 687 Earth zap rocks, and a drill to collect rock samples. These all conditions to support small life forms called microbes? days (~98 weeks) help in the hunt for special rocks that formed in water Taking the next steps to understand Mars as a possible and/or have signs of organics. The rover also has Main Objectives place for life, Curiosity builds on an earlier “follow the three communications antennas. • Search for organics and determine if this area of Mars was water” strategy that guided Mars missions in NASA’s ever habitable for microbial life Mars Exploration Program. Besides looking for signs of • Characterize the chemical and mineral composition of Ultra-High-Frequency wet climate conditions and for rocks and minerals that ChemCam Antenna rocks and soil formed in water, Curiosity also seeks signs of carbon- Mastcam MMRTG • Study the role of water and changes in the Martian climate over time based molecules called organics.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Lunar and Planetary Base Architectures
    Space 2003 AIAA 2003-6280 23 - 25 September 2003, Long Beach, California Mobile Lunar and Planetary Bases Marc M. Cohen, Arch.D. Advanced Projects Branch, Mail Stop 244-14, NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 TEL 650 604-0068 FAX 650 604-0673 [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper presents a review of design concepts over three decades for developing mobile lunar and planetary bases. The idea of the mobile base addresses several key challenges for extraterrestrial surface bases. These challenges include moving the landed assets a safe distance away from the landing zone; deploying and assembling the base remotely by automation and robotics; moving the base from one location of scientific or technical interest to another; and providing sufficient redundancy, reliability and safety for crew roving expeditions. The objective of the mobile base is to make the best use of the landed resources by moving them to where they will be most useful to support the crew, carry out exploration and conduct research. This review covers a range of surface mobility concepts that address the mobility issue in a variety of ways. These concepts include the Rockwell Lunar Sortie Vehicle (1971), Cintala’s Lunar Traverse caravan, 1984, First Lunar Outpost (1992), Frassanito’s Lunar Rover Base (1993), Thangavelu’s Nomad Explorer (1993), Kozlov and Shevchenko’s Mobile Lunar Base (1995), and the most recent evolution, John Mankins’ “Habot” (2000-present). The review compares the several mobile base approaches, then focuses on the Habot approach as the most germane to current and future exploration plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Lunar Horizon Glow with the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA)
    Searching for lunar horizon glow with the lunar orbiter laser altimeter (LOLA) M. K. Barker, D. Smith, T. McClanahan, E. Mazarico, X. Sun, M. T. Zuber, G. A. Neumann, M. H. Torrence, J. W. Head DAP-2017 Boulder, CO Jan. 11-13, 2017 Lunar Horizon Glow • Surveyor landers, Lunokhod-2 lander, Apollo 17 astronaut sketches (Rennilson & Criswell 1974, Severnyi et al. 1975, McCoy & Criswell 1974, Zook & McCoy 1991) ==> Electrostatic levitation, dynamic lofting (Stubbs et al. 2006, Farrell et al. 2007) • Apollo 15 photographs at dawn: LHG extending ~30 km above horizon, N~103-105 cm-2 for grain r = 0.1 µm (McCoy 1976, Glenar et al. 2011) ==> Meteor stream impact ejecta could initiate a saltation-like cascade process • Recent searches with Clementine Star Trackers, LRO/LAMP, and LADEE/LDEX gave limits on dust density ~100x lower than A15 (Glenar et al. 2014, Feldman et al. 2014, Szalay & Horányi 2015, Horányi et al. 2015) Glenar et al. (2011) Lunar Orbiter ~65 m Diffractive Optical Element Laser Altimeter (LOLA) •5-beam time-of-flight laser altimeter onboard the Lunar Reconnaissance 50 m Orbiter (LRO) 5-m diameter •28 Hz laser, 140 measurements/sec observation area (red) •Each shot provides: • up to 5 ranges to surface (10 cm prec.) 20-m FOV (green) • footprint-scale surface roughness • footprint-scale slope 10 to 12 m apart • 1064-nm reflectance of surface along track •Detectors: 5 fiber optically-coupled avalanche photodiodes LOLA has two radiometric modes: (1) Active radiometry: LOLA laser is the light source. 1064-nm normal albedo Lemelin et al. (2016) (2) Passive radiometry: Sun is the light source.
    [Show full text]